Abstract
Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli (DEC) causes human diarrhea symptom in both healthy and immunocompromised individuals. An auto-microfluidic thin-film chip (AMTC) instrument integrating one-step multiplex PCR (mPCR) with reverse dot blot hybridization (RDBH) was developed for high-throughput detection of DEC. The novel mPCR method was developed by designing 14 specific primers and corresponding probes. 14 indexes including an endogenous gene (uidA) and 13 pathogenic genes (stx1, stx2, escV, ipaH, invE, estB, lt, pic, aggR, astA, bfpB, sth and stp) of DEC were detected. This one-step mPCR + RDBH approach is useful for simultaneous detection of numerous target genes in a single sample, whose specificity and availability have been confirmed on the positive control of 11 DEC strains. In addition, with 300 diarrheal stool samples being detected by this method, 21 were found to contain five major DEC strains. Compared with monoplex PCR and previous one-step mPCR approach, this method could detect ipaH and estB, and compared with current commercial kit, the relevance ratio of DEC detected by the AMTC method was increased by 1% in stool samples. Furthermore, the novel integration AMTC device could be a valuable detection tool for categorization of E. coli.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Most E. coli strains are normal inhabitants of the human intestinal tract. Some strains have acquired virulence genes that confer pathogenicity and are clarified as DEC1. The major virulence factors are essential for the study of the epidemiology and pathogenicity of DEC infection, such as severe diarrhea, food poisoning and similar outbreaks worldwide. Infections with these kinds of pathogens have therefore aroused increasing concern in the clinical diagnosis of diarrheal disease in recent years. These virulent organisms can be classified into five major categories on the basis of the nature of their infections and pathogenic mechanisms2,3,4, namely, enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC), enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC), enteroinvasive E. coli (EIEC), enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC), and enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC). However, current rates of infections by these important enteric pathogens are probably underestimated to a great extent, because the existing clinical diagnostic methods are unable to distinguish them from normal nonpathogenic flora. To achieve the goal of epidemic prevention and control of DEC, a more reliable procedure is required to identify and categorize DEC isolates.
Many clinical laboratories routinely perform only serotyping assays aiming at detection of DEC. By using primers of virulence genes, the current monoplex PCR or multiplex PCR assay offers the possibility of rapid diagnosis of DEC strains5,6. Nevertheless, screening of bacterial isolates for DEC strains requires a large number of individual PCR assays when single primer sets are used7. Qualitative detection of DEC is performed by the agarose gelelectrophoresis based on various distributions of different sizes of amplified fragments. So, the number of fragments that can be detected is limited, and the bands of small fragments cannot be recognized very well. Besides, some genes recently reported in the study of the epidemiology and pathogenicity of DEC infection, such as ipaH and estB8,9, were not included in the detection by these methods. Accordingly, it is particularly important and urgent to improve the DEC detection methods.
Recently, one-step mPCR finds wide application in categorization and detection of some bacterial strains10,11, and it has been used in some commercial kits as well. This newly-developed method avoids the abundant repeats of individual PCR assays, so it is unnecessary to consider the size of the fragments of PCR products. Moreover, one-step mPCR and RDBH can be combined together with AMTC device12. The AMTC method shows some advantages on detection of DEC strains, such as increased test capacity, added indexes like ipaH and estB, quickened detection, and improved accuracy of detection.
In this study, 14 specific primers were designed to form one-step multiplex PCR of a newly developed kit, and 14 specific probes were designed accordingly. As shown in Fig. 1A, a square nylon thin-film was divided into 16 small areas using lines. The probes were immobilized on different areas of the square nylon thin-film in line with the surface design in Fig. 1B. Together with the AMTC device, qualitative detection of DEC was successfully established. Further, DEC strains in 300 diarrheal stool samples were detected using the AMTC method.
Results
Detection of DEC Strains by Monoplex PCR and Electrophoresis
By using the specific primers listed in China National Standard (GB 4789.6-2016), the collected DEC strains were identified by monoplex PCR. As shown in Fig. 2, 9 strains were identified positively in 11 DEC strains. BP01 was identified as EHEC; BP02 and BP03 were identified as EIEC; BP04 was identified as atypical EPEC; BP05 was identified as typical EPEC; BP08 and BP09 were identified as ETEC; BP10 and BP11 were identified as EAEC; and BP06 and BP07 were identified as E. coli (Supplementary Fig. S1).
Detection of DEC Strains by Previous One-step mPCR and Electrophoresis
The above mentioned eleven DEC strains were also detected by a commercial kit, in which one-step mPCR and electrophoresis were mainly used. As shown in Fig. 3, BP01 was identified as EHEC; BP03 was identified as EIEC; BP04 was identified as atypical EPEC; BP05 was identified as typical EPEC; BP08 and BP09 were identified as ETEC; BP10 and BP11 were identified as EAEC; and BP02, BP06 and BP07 were identified as E. coli. Some E. coli strains, positive and negative controls were identified (Supplementary Fig. S2).
Detection of DEC Strains by the Novel One-step mPCR + RDBH
The detection results of DEC strains by a novel one-step mPCR + RDBH method on AMTC instrument are shown in Fig. 4. BP01 was identified as EHEC; BP02 and BP03 were identified as EIEC; BP04 was identified as atypical EPEC; BP05 was identified as typical EPEC; BP06, BP08 and BP09 were identified as ETEC; and BP10 and BP11 were identified as EAEC; only BP07 was identified as E. coli.
Detection of Other Diarrhea Related Strains by the Novel One-step mPCR + RDBH
To test the specificity of the novel one-step mPCR + RDBH method on the AMTC instrument, it was also used to test diarrhea-related strains different from E. coli. Salmonella enteric (CICC 21493), Vibrio parahaemolyticus (CICC 21617), Campylobacter jejuni (CICC 22936) and Vibrio cholera (CICC 23794) could not be detected by any of the AMTC indexes. Only Shigella flexneri (CICC 21534) and Shigella sonnei (CICC 21535) could be detected at the site of uidA and ipaH (Supplementary Fig. S3).
Detection of Diarrheal Stool Samples by Previous One-step mPCR and Electrophoresis
By using the previous one-step mPCR and electrophoresis listed in the current commercial kit, 18 diarrheal stool samples were found to contain DEC strains among a total of 300 samples. The positive rate was 6%. Part of results are shown in Fig. 5, indicating that EHEC was identified positively in one sample; EIEC was identified positively in two samples; typical EPEC was identified positively in one sample; atypical EPEC was identified positively in five samples; ETEC was identified positively in four samples; and EAEC was identified positively in five samples.
Detection of Diarrheal Stool Samples by the Novel One-step mPCR + RDBH
These 300 diarrheal stool samples were also identified by the novel one-step mPCR + RDBH method on the AMTC instrument, where, 21 samples were detected to contain DEC strains. The positive rate was 7%. As shown in Fig. 6, EHEC was identified positively in one sample; EIEC was identified positively in two samples; typical EPEC was identified positively in one sample; atypical EPEC was identified positively in four samples; ETEC was identified positively in six samples; EAEC was identified positively in six samples; and ETEC+ atypical EPEC were identified simultaneously in one sample. Compared with current commercial kit, the relevance ratio of DEC detected by the AMTC method was increased by 1% in stool samples.
Discussion
With more detection indexes and improved detection rate of DEC, the AMTC method is able to detect 14 indexes in a single reaction. This would avoid the probability of undetected ipaH and estB. Compared with monoplex PCR, the AMTC method identified BP06 as ETEC, just owing to estB. Compared with commercial kit, the AMTC method identified BP02 as EIEC, and BP06 as ETEC, just owing to ipaH and estB. For the detection of diarrheal stool samples, compared with commercial kit, the AMTC method identified YP223, and YP248 as ETEC, just owing to estB; identified YP295 as EAEC, just owing to astA; and identified YP299 as ETEC+ atypical EPEC, just owing to estB.
The AMTC method could be used to distinguish sub-type of DEC. Some researchers reported that astA encoded the EAST1, but astA is widely distributed in DEC, and its role in the pathogenicity of this organism remains unclear13. Some researchers reported that a strain harboring astA was associated with a waterborne outbreak of diarrhea in Japan14. So, further studies are needed to evaluate the significance of EAST1 as a virulence factor of DEC. This study showed 15 clinical strains contained astA, while 7 of them contained 3 sth, 1 stp and 3 escV. Obviously, astA is common among EHEC, EPEC, ETEC and EAEC, and each sample should be tested separately with specific primers such as stx1, stx2, escV, estB, lt, pic, aggR, astA, bfpB, sth and stp by monoplex PCR method. However, these processes could be completed using the newly-developed AMTC method in a single reaction. Some researchers believed that EAEC possesses both pic and aggR present in the virulence plasmid pAA15,16. Some researchers identified a few pic-positive and aggR-negative strains, and vice versa17. Reportedly, some researchers used only aggR for detecting pAA10. However, we found a positive single virulence gene and coexistence of two positive genes in the detection of diarrhea samples about EAEC.
The AMTC method possesses high efficiency and high throughput. For example, EscV is common between EHEC and EPEC, and in order to distinguish these two pathogens, bfpB and stx1 + stx2 must also be run by monoplex PCR method. Meanwhile, when bfpB and stx1 + stx2 are negative, the results can be identified as atypical EPEC, with positive bfpB being identified as typical EPEC, and positive stx1 + stx2 identified as EHEC. The results obtained by us show this method is able to perform both simultaneous amplification of virulence genes from E. coli isolates and simultaneous differentiation of the 5 categories of DEC.
The AMTC method has the advantages of good repeatability and stability. Two new indexes, ipaH and estB basing on monoplex PCR, and a multiplex PCR diagnostic kit, have been added to this method. Compared with the previous one-step mPCR, segment length of the PCR products for the novel one-step mPCR was basically the same, thus it could reduce competition between primers. Compared with electrophoretic detection, the fragments of poor amplification could also be detected with such RDBH method, resulting in a stable detection. Furthermore, one-step mPCR integrating with RDBH allows it to improve repeatability and stability of the detection results. Accordingly, the AMTC method would be a valuable contribution to the routine diagnostic laboratory tests while providing important information for the epidemiological and other studies.
Materials and Methods
Bacterial Strains
A total of eleven DEC strains used in this study were purchased from China Center of Industrial Culture Collection (CICC). They were Escherichia coli EHEC O 157:H7 (CICC 21530) containing Shiga-like toxin I (stx1), Shiga-like toxin II (stx2), eae and escV18, Escherichia coli EPEC (CICC 10664) containing eae and escV, where EPEC can be classified as typical or atypical one based on the production of bundle-forming pili (bfp) encoded by the Escherichia adherence factor (EAF) gene15, Escherichia coli EIEC (CICC 10662) containing ipaH and invE19,20,21,22, Escherichia coli ETEC O78:K80 (CICC 10421) and O126: K71 (CICC 10415) containing the heat-labile toxin (LT) and the heat-stable toxin (ST)22,23,24,25, Escherichia coli EAEC purchased from Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen (DSMZ), and it (DSMZ 10974) containing aggR, pic and enteroaggregative heat-stable enterotoxin EAST1 (astA)26,27,28. Some other diarrhea strains different from E. coli in this study were Salmonella enterica subsp. Enterica serovar Choleraesuis (CICC 21493), Shigella flexneri (CICC 21534), Shigella sonnei (CICC 21535), Vibrio parahaemolyticus CICC 21617), Campylobacter jejuni (CICC 22936) and Vibriocholera (CICC 23794).
Stool samples
A total of 300 diarrheal stool samples were collected from National Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. The samples were stored at −80 °C.
Preparation of DNA Templates
All DNA samples used in this study were extracted by QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Germany). The templates used for PCR comprise the DNA of EHEC O157:H7, EPEC, EIEC, ETEC O78:K80, ETEC O126: K71, EAEC, some other DEC strains, some diarrhea strains differing from E. coli, and diarrheal stool samples. The final concentration of DNA in extracts from bacterial strains and stool samples was 25 ng/µL.
Probes and Primers used for Detection of DEC
The oligonucleotide probes used in the AMTC corresponding to the reverse primers in one-step mPCR of a newly developed kit are listed in Table 1. An aminolinker C6 was added as a 5′-modified group to provide spaces between probes and immobilization substrates. The oligonucleotide primers used in monoplex PCR were collected from the China National Standard GB 4789.6–2016, being listed in Table 2. The final concentration of each primer used in the PCR amplification system depends on the GB 4789.6–2016. The primers used in a multiplex PCR diagnostic kit (a commercial kit currently used) were the components in the kit. The oligonucleotide primers used in a newly developed kit were designed by Primer premier v5.0, as shown in Table 3. The 5′ ends of the reverse primers were modified by a biotin group. Among them, the proportion of forward and reverse primers for each pair primers was 2:3. The final concentration of each primer in mixed PCR primers should be 10 µM. The predicted length of PCR products was ranged between 100 and 300 bp. All the primers and probes were synthesized by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
Monoplex PCR
PCR amplifications were performed as follows: 2 µL of bacterial extract was added to the reaction mixture with a final volume of 20 µL containing 10 µL Premix Taq™ (Takara, Code No. RR902A), 1 µL PCR primer mix and 7 µL ddH2O.These mixtures were pre-denatured at 94 °C for 5 min and then amplified for 30 cycles by using a thermal cycler (Model: BIORAD T100). Each cycle was composed of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 63 °C for 30 s, and extension at 72 °C for 1.5 min. A final extension step was performed at 72 °C for 5 min, and the tubes were rapidly cooled to 4 °C. Qualitative detection of DEC was accomplished by the 2% agarose gel electrophoresis.
One-step mPCR
One-step mPCR was performed by using a multiplex PCR diagnostic kit and a newly developed kit, respectively. PCR mix of the multiplex PCR diagnostic kit, with a final volume of 25 µL, included 2 × PCR Buffer 12.5 µL, 10 × Multiplex Assay 2.5 µL, 25 × PCR Enzyme 1 µL, 2 µL of bacterial extract, and 7 µL of ddH2O. These mixtures were pre-denatured at 95 °C for 4 min and then amplified for 30 cycles by using a thermal cycler (Model: BIORAD T100). Each cycle was composed of denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, annealing at 62 °C for 30 s, and extension at 72 °C for 90 s. A final extension step was conducted at 72 °C for 5 min, and the tubes were rapidly cooled to 4 °C. Qualitative detection of DEC was accomplished by the 2% agarose gel electrophoresis about a multiplex PCR diagnostic kit. PCR mix of the newly developed kit, with a final volume of 20 µL, included 10 µL of 2 × KAPA2G Fast Multiplex Mix (KAPA Biosystems, USA), 1 µL of mixed PCR primers, 2 µL of bacterial extract, and 7 µL of ddH2O. These mixtures were preheated at 37 °C for 5 min, pre-denatured at 95 °C for 3 min and then amplified for 35 cycles by using a thermal cycler (Model: BIORAD T100). Each cycle was composed of denaturation at 95 °C for 15 s, annealing at 55 °C for 30 s, and extension at 68 °C for 15 s. A final extension step was conducted at 68 °C for 3 min, and the tubes were rapidly cooled to 4 °C. Qualitative detection of DEC was accomplished by RDBH about a newly developed kit.
Microfluidic thin-film chip
DNA probes were spotted and immobilized on a nylon thin-film according to the surface design. This step can be performed manually or by a machine. Then, the nylon thin-film probes spot array was incubated in 80 °C for 1 h, and it was placed in a small cell with two small holes. The microfluidic thin-film chip consisted of three main parts: a square nylon thin-film, a small cell with two small holes, and two microfluidic tubes. The small cell was a small square plastic box with a sealing ring on the inner side of the lid. When a square nylon thin-film was placed into the small box, the lid was closed, forming a closed cell. PCR products were added to the reaction cell through the microfluidic tube. When the PCR products passed over the surface of the square nylon thin-film containing the probe array, the target DNA in the PCR products was captured by the sensing surface DNA base pairing between the probes and target DNA12.
Qualitative Detection of DEC with RDBH
The AMTC instrument consisted of four main parts: a machine shell, micro-reaction cell, sample needle with pump, and sample and waste liquid plate. The eight microfluidic thin-film chip cells were placed on the micro-reaction cell of the AMTC device (Sichuan Hua Hansan Bio Technology Co., Ltd. #39, Fucheng West Rd., Chengdu, 610041, China). PCR products were added as samples to the sample plate of the AMTC device, and then the single-stranded DNA (Positive-Oligo, 10 μmol/L) complementary to the positive control (PC) probe was added to each PCR product sample for quality control. The hybridization buffer, cleaning buffers, enzyme buffer, and dyeing agent (NBT and BCIP) were placed in sample plate, with the signal being visualized with streptavidin-alkaline phosphatase color development kit (ZSGB-BIO, China). The sample needle with pump operated with an up and down movement and took different samples by rotating the sample plate. Under the control of an automatic hybridization program, the AMTC instrument could add samples and perform the reaction, washing, and coloring steps. The running procedures and time of the AMTC instrument were listed in Table 4.
Statistical analysis
The criterion for classification of diarrhoea E. coli was shown in Table 5. According to the criterion for classification, positive samples were identified. Compared with the total number of samples, the positive rate of different methods can be calculated.
References
Montero, D. A. et al. Locus of Adhesion and Autoaggregation (LAA), a pathogenicity island present in emerging Shiga Toxin-producing Escherichia coli strains. Scientific Reports. 7, 7011 (2017).
Toma, C. et al. Multiplex PCR Assay for Identification of Human Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 41, 2669–2671 (2003).
Eigner, U. et al. Evaluation of a New Real-time PCR Assay for the Direct Detection of Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli in Stool Samples. Diagnostic Microbiology & Infectious Disease. 88, 12 (2017).
Hazen, T. H. et al. Comparative Genomics and Transcriptomics of Escherichia coli Isolates Carrying Virulence Factors of both Enteropathogenic and Enterotoxigenic E. coli. Scientific Reports. 7, 3513 (2017).
Gannon, V. P. et al. Detection and Characterization of the Eae Gene of Shiga-like Toxin-producing Escherichia coli Using Polymerase Chain Reaction. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 31, 1268–1274 (1993).
Karch, H. et al. Clonal Structure and Pathogenicity of Shiga-like Toxin-producing, Sorbitol-fermenting Escherichia coli O157: H-. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 31, 1200–1205 (1993).
Itoh, F. et al. Differentiation and Detection of Pathogenic Determinants among Diarrheogenic Escherichia coli by Polymerase Chain Reaction Using Mixed Primers. Nippon Rinsho Japanese Journal of Clinical Medicine. 50, 343–347 (1992).
Aranda, K. R. S. et al. Single Multiplex Assay to Identify Simultaneously Enteropathogenic, Enteroaggregative, Enterotoxigenic, Enteroinvasive and Shiga Toxin-producing Escherichiacoli Strains in Brazilian Children. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 267, 145–150 (2007).
Erume, J. et al. Inverse Relationship between Heat-stable Enterotoxin-b Induced Fluid Accumulation and Adherence of F4ac-positive Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli in Ligated Jejunal Loops of F4ab/ac Fimbria Receptor-positive Swine. Veterinary Microbiology. 161, 315 (2013).
Fujioka, M., Saito, M. & Otomo, Y. Direct Detection of Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli in Patient Stool Samples by Developed Multiplex PCRs: For the Establishment of Surveillance System of Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli. Japanese. Journal of Medical Technology. 57, 1041–1046 (2008).
Fujioka, M., Otomo, Y. & Ahsan, C. R. A Novel Single-step Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay for the Detection of Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli. Journal of Microbiological Methods. 92, 289–292 (2013).
Yun, Z. et al. Auto-microfluidic Thin-film Chip for Genetically Modified Maize Detection. Food Control (2017).
Savarino, S. et al. Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli heat-stable enterotoxin 1 represents another subfamily of E. coli heat-stable toxin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 90, 3093–3097 (1993).
Yatsuyanagi, J. et al. Characterization of Atypical Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli Strains harboring the astA gene that were associated with a waterborne outbreak of diarrhea in Japan. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 41, 2033–2039 (2003).
Nataro, J. P. & Kaper, J. B. Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 11, 142–201 (1998).
Yatsuyanagi, J. et al. Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli Strains harboring enteroaggregative Escherichia coli (EAggEC) heat-stable enterotoxin-1 gene isolated from a food-borne like outbreak. Kansenshogaku Zasshi the Journal of the Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases. 70, 73–79 (1996).
Kimata, K. et al. Rapid Categorization of Pathogenic Escherichia coli by Multiplex PCR. Microbiology & Immunology. 49, 485–492 (2005).
Tarr, P. I., Gordon, C. A. & Chandler, W. L. Shiga-toxin–producing Escherichia coli and haemolytic uraemic syndrome. The Lancet. 365, 1073–1086 (2005).
Broach, W. H. et al. VirF-independent Regulation of Shigella virB Transcription is mediated by the Small RNA RyhB. Plos One. 7, e38592 (2012).
Sousa, M. Â. B. et al. Shigella in Brazilian Children with Acute Diarrhoea: Prevalence, Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Genes. Memórias Do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. 108, 30–35 (2013).
Nave, H. H. et al. Virulence Gene Profile and Multilocus Variable-Number Tandem-Repeat Analysis (MLVA) of Enteroinvasive Escherichia coli (EIEC) Isolates From Patients With Diarrhea in Kerman, Iran. Jundishapur. Journal of Microbiology. 9 (2016).
Gomes, T. A. T. et al. Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology. 47, 3–30 (2016).
Kaper, J. B. & Al, E. Pathogenic Escherichia coli. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2, 123–140 (2004).
Sjoling, A. et al. Comparative Analyses of Phenotypic and Genotypic Methods for Detection of Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli Toxins and Colonization Factors. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 45, 3295–3301 (2007).
Lasaro, M. A. et al. Genetic Diversity of Heat-Labile Toxin Expressed by Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli Strains Isolated from Humans. Journal of Bacteriology. 190, 2400–2410 (2008).
Kaur, P., Chakraborti, A. & Asea, A. Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli: An Emerging Enteric Food Borne Pathogen. Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Infectious Diseases. 2010, 1–10 (2010).
Ruiz-Perez, F. & Nataro, J. P. Bacterial Serine Proteases Secreted by the Autotransporter Pathway: Classification, Specificity, and Role inVirulence. Cellular & Molecular Life Sciences. Cmls. 71, 745–770 (2014).
Abreu, G. A. et al. The Serine Protease Pic From Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli Mediates Immune Evasion by the Direct Cleavage of Complement Proteins. Journal of Infectious Diseases. 212, 106–115 (2015).
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to express their gratitude to National Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention for their kind support in providing the stool samples. Grateful acknowledgement is also made to all staff members of the Company laboratory for their contribution in collection of the samples for study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Z.Y. mainly contributed to data analysis and writing of the manuscript. L.Z. mainly contributed to design of primers and probes, and writing of the manuscript. W.H. and Y.F. mainly contributed to design of chips. Q.W. mainly contributed to collection of strains and samples. S.Z. mainly contributed to revisions of the manuscript. L.P. mainly contributed to extraction of DNA. J.H. mainly contributed to performing of PCR. Y.H. mainly contributed to producing of chips. H.Z. mainly contributed to hybridization. H.C. contributed to the overall design of the study.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Yun, Z., Zeng, L., Huang, W. et al. Detection and Categorization of Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli with Auto-microfluidic Thin-film Chip Method. Sci Rep 8, 12926 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-30765-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-30765-3
This article is cited by
-
Innovative next-generation therapies in combating multi-drug-resistant and multi-virulent Escherichia coli isolates: insights from in vitro, in vivo, and molecular docking studies
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (2022)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.