CD271 determines migratory properties of melanoma cells

Radke, Josefine; Roßner, Florian; Redmer, Torben

doi:10.1038/s41598-017-10129-z

Download PDF

Article
Open access
Published: 29 August 2017

CD271 determines migratory properties of melanoma cells

Josefine Radke^1,2,5,6,
Florian Roßner^4,5 &
Torben Redmer^1,3,4,5

Scientific Reports volume 7, Article number: 9834 (2017) Cite this article

3920 Accesses
31 Citations
4 Altmetric
Metrics details

Subjects

Abstract

Melanoma cell expression of the nerve growth factor receptor CD271 is associated with stem-like properties. However, the contributing role of the receptor in melanoma cell migration is elusive. Here, we explored extracranial (skin, soft tissue, lymph node and liver, n = 13) and matched brain metastases (BM, n = 12) and observed a heterogeneous distribution of phenotypically distinct subsets of CD271⁺ cells. In addition, we observed that CD271 expression gradually rises along with melanoma progression and metastasis by exploration of publicly available expression data of nevi, primary melanoma (n = 31) and melanoma metastases (n = 54). Furthermore, we observed highest levels of CD271 in BM. Sub-clustering identified 99 genes differentially expressed among CD271^high and CD271^low (p < 0.05) BM-subgroups. Comparative analysis of subsets revealed increased ( ≥ 1.5fold, log2) expression of migration-associated genes and enrichment of CD271-responsible genes involved in DNA-repair and stemness. Live cell-imaging based scratch-wound assays of melanoma cells with stable knock-down of CD271 revealed a significantly reduced cell migration (3.9fold, p = 1.2E-04) and a reduced expression of FGF13, CSPG4, HMGA2 and AKT3 major candidate regulatory genes of melanoma cell migration. In summary, we provide new insights in melanoma cell migration and suggest that CD271 serves as a candidate regulator, sufficient to determine cellular properties of melanoma brain metastatic cells.

ZEB1 controls a lineage-specific transcriptional program essential for melanoma cell state transitions

Article Open access 22 March 2024

Loss of NECTIN1 triggers melanoma dissemination upon local IGF1 depletion

Article Open access 13 October 2022

SOX10 deficiency-mediated LAMB3 upregulation determines the invasiveness of MAPKi-resistant melanoma

Article 15 December 2023

Introduction

Distant metastasis is still the major obstacle to overcome in melanoma therapy, associated with poor prognosis and a ten-year survival rate of patients with distant metastases (stage IV) <10%¹. Metastatic dissemination of primary tumors is an early event² and the majority of patients exhibit regional or distant metastases by the time of diagnosis. Melanoma cells feature a high migratory phenotype³ facilitating the colonization of distant organs e.g. lung, liver, heart, peritoneum, small intestine, spleen and brain⁴. Despite this broad spectrum of possibly involved organs, brain metastases are very common, observed in 20–40% of melanoma patients. In addition, brain metastases are actually found post mortem in more than 75% of melanoma patients⁵. Moreover, multiple brain metastases (>5 intracerebral metastatic lesions) are observed in 5% of melanoma patients⁶ and may derive either from one founder clone or represent independent clones of different metastatic melanoma cells. Overall, the emergence of brain metastases is associated with poor prognosis due to limited therapeutic options. Stereotactic or whole-brain radiotherapy in combination with chemotherapy or immune-checkpoint inhibitors⁷ has recently gained increasing attention as meaningful therapeutic option for melanoma patients with brain metastases.

Migration and invasion of tumor cells are essential steps in the metastasis sequence⁸. Recently, the expression of nerve growth factor receptor CD271 was associated with increased incidence of melanoma brain metastases⁹ as well as metastases in lung, liver and kidney¹⁰. Furthermore, the BRAF^V600E mutation intrinsically confers a high migratory phenotype to melanoma cells¹¹, blocked by the potent RAF-kinase inhibitor vemurafenib. Contrary, patients under vemurafenib therapy show a higher incidence for brain metastases as compared with patients who did not receive vemurafenib¹². In addition, acquisition of melanoma cell resistance to vemurafenib as well as a higher tendency of brain metastasis was associated with expression of CD271^{13, 14}. Hence, CD271 expression may prime melanoma cells intrinsically for extensive migration, metastasis and brain tropism. Apart from melanoma, other tumor entities bearing CD271⁺ cells¹⁵ also show comparable prevalence for brain metastasis, e.g. breast cancer (15–30%, reviewed in ref. 16). In glioblastoma, CD271⁺ cells represent a cellular sub-set highly capable of migrating and infiltrating the brain parenchyma¹⁷. However, it remains elusive whether CD271⁺ cells present a cell subpopulation prone to metastasize to the brain.

Here we explored the presence and distribution of CD271 expressing cells in primary melanoma as well as in extracranial, solitary and multiple brain metastases and elucidated the potential role of CD271 in melanoma brain tropism.

Results

Expression of CD271 discriminates melanoma progression stages and defines subsets of melanoma metastases

Melanoma cells facilitate a high migratory phenotype¹⁸ capable of radial or vertical migration, reviewed in ref. 19. To explore whether CD271⁺ melanoma cells are prone to metastasize to the brain, we analyzed matched pairs of primary tumors (n = 2), extracranial (n = 13) and brain metastasis (n = 12) as well as unmatched brain (n = 7) and extracranial (n = 1) metastases of melanoma for expression of CD271, irrespective of the BRAF mutation status and therapeutic interventions (Supplementary information, SI; Table S1). We observed a median CD271 expression of 32% (range 0.5–100%) in extracranial and 11.9% (range 0.5–100%) in brain metastases. Hence, expression of CD271 was not significantly increased in either of these groups (Fig. 1A,B) and reflected strong inter-sample variations among melanoma metastases and primary tumors (Fig. 1B, left panel, p = 0.081; SI, Figures S1 and S2A,B). Highest CD271 expression (90%) was observed in a desmoplastic neurotrophic melanoma (DNM) and corresponding skin (n = 2) and brain metastases (n = 1), (Fig. 1A and SI, Figure S3A; Patient 1). In superficial spreading melanoma (SSM), we observed randomly distributed CD271⁺ cells within the tumor bulk or expression of CD271 at tumor edges and a wide-spread distribution in a soft tissue (ST) metastasis (Fig. 1A, Patients 2, 3). In healthy skin, CD271 expression was found in proliferating and non-proliferating (Ki67⁺/Ki67⁻) cells of the basal layer, and MART1⁺ or MITF⁺ melanocytes (SI, Figure S4A). Exploration of lymph node metastases not only revealed the presence of CD271⁺ tumor cells but also a prominent expression of CD271 in adjacent lymph follicles (LN) (SI, Figure S4B).

In a primary tumor of uveal melanoma (n = 1) we observed CD271 expression in the choroid cells as well as in spindle-shaped (Spin) but not epithelioid-appearing (Epi) tumor cells (SI, Figure S5A). In the associated liver and brain metastasis, we observed expression of CD271 in tumor cells (T) as well as in interstitial or stromal and vessel-adjacent cells (SI, Figures S5B,C).

Further, we explored publicly available expression data (GSE7553²⁰) of melanoma metastases (MET, n = 34), primary melanoma (PM, n = 14), melanoma in situ (MIS, n = 2), melanocytes (Mel, n = 1), basal cell carcinoma (BCC, n = 15), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC, n = 11) and normal skin (NS, n = 4). We observed highest CD271 expression in MET, as compared to PM (p = 0.032) which in turn show higher CD271 levels as compared to BCC (p = 0.034) and SCC (not significant, NS) (Fig. 1B, right panel). In addition, we observed a high variance of CD271 expression levels among primary melanoma subtypes: Acral, SSM, Nodular, Desmoplastic, LMM and spindle cell melanoma (GSE15605²¹), (SI, Figure S6A). We next asked for levels of CD271 expression along stages of melanoma evolution and progression (GSE46517²²). We observed that expression of CD271 increased with melanoma progression and attained significantly (p = 0.018) highest levels in MET (n = 54) as compared to PM, n = 31 (Fig. 2A, left panel), which is in line with a previous observation²³. Together, our findings are underpinned by public data and demonstrate the existence of subsets of melanoma metastases with high expression of CD271. This was further evaluated with expression data of metastases of different metastatic sites (GSE50493). We observed a subset of BM (n = 5 of 29, 17.2%) with strong CD271 expression (Fig. 2A, right panel). Next, we asked whether a high level of CD271 indeed determines the character of these CD271^high tumors. A comparative analysis of expression data of CD271^high BM (BM-CD271^high) or low (CD271^low) CD271 expression led to identification of 2834 differentially regulated genes (p ≤ 0.05). Among them we identified 62 genes with increased ( ≥ 1.5fold, log2; p ≤ 0.05) and 37 genes with decreased ( ≤ 1.5fold, log2; p ≤ 0.05) expression in the CD271^high subset as compared to CD271^low tumors (Fig. 2B). Tumors of the CD271^high subset showed a ~5fold higher CD271 expression (p = 0.002) as compared to CD271^low brain tumors (n = 13), (SI, Figure S6B-C). Among the top regulated genes we found those associated with cell migration e.g. NRCAM²⁴ (neural cell adhesion molecule), TWIST1²⁵ or LOX²⁶ (lysyl oxidase) (Fig. 2B). In addition, gene-set enrichment analysis (GSEA) of both subsets of brain tumors demonstrated that CD271 expression is associated with enrichment of CD271-responsible genes²⁷ (NES = 2.20), (Fig. 2C). Next, we asked for CD271-responsible genes potentially up-regulated in the CD271^high subgroups of brain metastases (BM) in independent data sets (GSE50493, GSE44660). We found CD271-responsible genes up-regulated in either of the two groups of CD271^high BM (Fig. 2C, right panel). In addition, we found commonly regulated genes associated with metastasis; TUBB2B²⁸ and PMEPA1²⁹, besides NGFR. Further exploration of genes differentially regulated among the CD271^high and CD271^low BM subsets revealed commonly up-regulated (n = 10) and down-regulated (n = 5) genes. Among genes with significantly increased expression in the CD271^high subsets were mediators of tumor cell migration e.g. AXL³⁰ and members of the lysyl-oxidase family LOX²⁶ and LOXL2³¹ as well as the less characterized SERTAD4 (SERTA Domain-Containing Protein 4), (SI, Figure S6D-E). In addition, we found increased expression of the receptor-tyrosine kinase c-MET in the CD271^low groups only (SI, Figure S6E). Additional GSEA of CD271^high and CD271^low subsets identified a global enrichment of genes associated with DNA-repair (NES = 2.05), a neural-crest cell stem-like (NCSC) state (NES = 1.89) or formation of cell projections, a prerequisite for cell migration and a brain metastatic phenotype in the subset of CD271^high BM (GSE50493), (SI, Figure S7A and S7B, left panel). Furthermore, we observed enrichment of genes associated with a EMT (epithelial to mesenchymal transition) cellular phenotype and CD271-dependent response in CD271^high BM of GSE44660 (SI, Figure S7B). Together these data suggest that CD271 serves as a subclassifier of melanoma brain metastases.

Tumor cell metastasis relies on the formation of focal adhesive contacts and the migratory capacity⁸. We previously observed a high migratory phenotype of A375 melanoma cells which was strongly enhanced (~15fold, p = 9.9E-8) by over expression of CD271 (A375^CD271/NGFR cells)²⁷, (Fig. 2D, left panel). We observed that genes associated with focal adhesion as well as lamellopodia structures are strongly enriched in A375^CD271/NGFR cells (Fig. 2D, right panel and SI, Figure S7C) as compared to A375^GFP cells. In addition, we followed migration of A375^GFP cells in mouse brain slice cultures by sequential confocal imaging to exemplify cell migration in a three-dimensional system (Movie files S1-S2). A375^GFP cells showed proliferation within the slice as monitored by immunofluorescence microscopy (SI, Figure S8A, upper panels) and the tracking of A375^GFP cells revealed their extensive migratory capacity (Fig. 2E, left panels and SI, Figure S9A-B) and showed the presence and distribution of migrating CD271⁺ cells. We tracked migration of A375^GFP cells with endogenous CD271 expression as soon as 48 hours post injection, regarding our previous in vitro data²⁷. Although the quantification of cells migrating within slices is difficult, we attempted to determine the number of cells capable of long distance migration. We measured the distance of the lower edge of the initial tumor to the most distantly migrated cells and observed that ~0.2–0.4% of cells reached a distance of 267–534 µm, among them were CD271⁺ cells (Fig. 2E; SI, Figure S9A). However, to ascertain whether a increased expression of CD271 is favorable for melanoma cell migration, A375^CD271/NGFR cells which show a high constitutive and stable cell surface expression of CD271 (SI, Figure S7C, left panels) not affected by phenotype switching processes, were injected in parallel to control cells (A375^GFP). Tracking of A375^CD271/NGFR cells demonstrated that CD271⁺ cells are indeed capable of intracerebral migration (Fig. 2E, right panels; SI, S10A-B and Movie file S3) and proliferation (SI, Figure S8A, lower panels) following adaption to environmental cues of the brain tissue. In line is the finding of migrating/infiltrating CD271⁺ melanoma cells in melanoma brain metastases (SI, Figure S8B, Patient 4).

CD271 knock-down impairs melanoma cell migration

To further unravel the role of CD271 in melanoma cell migration we explored the migratory capacity of a patient tumor-derived cell strain³² following stable shRNA mediated knock-down of CD271. The efficient knock-down of CD271 with a validated shRNA (sh#3) (Fig. 3A, left panels) induced a strong change in morphology, without effecting the overall number of Ki67⁺ cells but decreased the number of BrdU⁺ cells (59.7 ± 8.5%, shCtl. vs. 34.3 ± 15.9%, shCD271/sh#3; p = 0.077, ttest), (Fig. 3A, right panels and SI, Figures S11A-B), therefore impaired proliferation. Next, we ascertained whether cell migration was affected by loss of CD271 expression in a live cell-imaging scratch-wound assay. Tracking migration of CD271 knock-down cells by imaging of the scratch wound every 3 hours (72 hours in total) revealed a strong decrease (1.3fold, p = 6.6E-03/3.9fold, p = 1.2E-04 or 9.8fold, p = 3.1E-05 at 24/48 or 72 hours) in the efficacy of wound closure as early as 24h, as compared to control (shCtl.) or GFP expressing cells (Fig. 3B, left panel and Movie files S4-S6). Confocal microscopy of mouse brain slices 5 days post injection of 5 000 cells of each (shCD271, sh#4 and control, shCtl.) revealed widespread migration of CD271⁺ control cells, exhibiting both radially and vertically migration (SI, Figure S12A and Movie file S6). In contrast, the knock-down cells, which we monitored via GFP expression showed no or only limited proliferation and migration (SI, Figures S12B-C and Movie file S8), underpinning the in vitro findings.

We next asked for the CD271-responsible regulation of factors potentially involved in cell migration like those associated with formation of cell projections. To this end, we explored our expression data sets of melanoma cells with knock-down (GSE52456) or over expression (GSE78155) of CD271 by GSEA and observed a depletion or enrichment of genes associated with formation of cell projections (Fig. 3C). The integrative analysis of both gene sets revealed a subset of directly CD271-responding genes (n = 20), known to be involved in cell migration or metastasis e.g. fibroblast growth factor 13 (FGF13)³³, chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan 4 (CSPG4)³⁴ (Fig. 3D). In addition, our screen identified other potential mediators of melanoma cell migration e.g. the high mobility group AT-hook 2 (HMGA2)³⁵ transcription factor or AKT3³⁶. We verified that expression of CD271 is crucial to maintain the levels of all four genes in melanoma cells stably expressing CD271-targeting shRNAs (sh#3/sh#4). qPCR of CD271 knock-down cells showed decreased levels of CSPG4 (p = 8.3E-04/8.1E-05), FGF13 (p = 2.1E-03/2.2E-04), HMGA2 (p = 1.8E-02/1.4E-04) and AKT3 (p = 6.5E-04/4.9E-06), (Fig. 3E, left panel). We further confirmed the loss of CSPG4, FGF13 and HMGA2 by immunofluorescence microscopy (Fig. 3E, right panel). Next, we ascertained the potential significance of these factors in melanoma migration and metastasis. To this end, we explored publicly available expression data of primary melanoma and extracranial metastases (GSE46517, GSE7553, GSE8401) for levels of HMGA2. We observed that HMGA2 was predominantly expressed in melanoma metastases with a significant difference in two out of three studies (p = 3.6E-06, p = 0.301 and p = 2.4E-05), (SI, Figures S13A, S14B). Since we observed a clear down-regulation of HMGA2 in CD271 knock-down cells, we asked for genes involved in melanoma migration and metastasis supposedly driven by a CD271/HMGA2 axis. We initially identified 1337 (FC_log2 ≤ 0.5, p ≤ 0.05) potential HMGA2-targets by exploration of expression profiling data of the breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231 with HMGA2 knock-down (GSE43741³⁷). We then employed expression data of our previous study (GSE52456). The integrative analysis of both sets of targets identified 130 genes, commonly down-regulated upon knock-down of CD271 or HMGA2 (SI, Table S3). Among these potential CD271/HMGA2 targets were migration and metastasis-associated genes e.g. SEMA3A, ST3GAL1³⁸, LOX²⁶ and PDLIM1³⁹. Further analyses demonstrated a significantly increased level of SEMA3A and ST3GAL1 or decreased level of PDLIM1 in MET (SI, Figure S13B, S14A-B). Next, we ascertained the dependence of HMGA2, PDLIM1 and SEMA3A expression of CD271. We ranked MET regarding their CD271 levels and observed a CD271-dependency of SEMA3A but not HMGA2 or PDLIM1 expression in CD271^high metastases (SI, Figure S14A-B). Further, we evaluated CSPG4 and FGF13 expression in MET and observed a non-significant or only partially significant difference in expression of CSPG4 or FGF13 among primary and metastatic melanoma (SI, Figures S13D, left panels; S13E and S14A), respectively. Although CSPG4 and CD271 are co-expressed in a subset of melanoma cells of MeWo^Par (parental MeWo) and T20/02 (SI, Figure S13D, right panels), their role in cell migration and metastasis might be different.

Activation of the PI3K/AKT pathway has been recognized as a potent driver of melanoma progression and metastasis, including metastasis to the brain^{36, 40, 41}. We asked whether the decrease of AKT3 expression in CD271 knock-down cells affected the overall activation of this pathway. We observed a reduced level of activated AKT, phosphorylated at S473 (p-AKT^S473) in CD271 knock-down cells but no changes in the levels of activated extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1/2 (p-ERK1/2), (SI, Figure S13F, left panels). In addition, sorting of melanoma cells for CD271 demonstrated a predominance of activated PI3K/AKT signaling in CD271⁺ cells (SI, Figure S13F, right panels).

Together, these data suggest that CD271 may control migration and metastasis mechanisms supposedly via a network of mediators e.g. HMGA2 or FGF13 or AKT- signaling (SI, Figure S14C).

Inspection of multiple brain metastases reveal phenotypical concordance

The mechanisms underlying melanoma metastasis to the brain are still poorly understood. Therefore the identification of key players determining brain metastases is mandatory.

In principle, several hypothetical scenarios for the seeding of primary tumors (PT) or extracranial metastases (EM) are plausible. Multiple seeding of CD271^high or CD271^low tumor cells should lead to intratumor heterogeneity of brain metastases (Fig. 4A, left scheme). The single seeding of PT/EM and establishment of a founder clone, derived from brain metastatic cells would increase the likelihood for the formation of multiple brain metastases with comparable phenotypes. The latter is given by seeding of the founder clone (Fig. 4A, center scheme). In another scenario, seeding of a founder clone and PT/EM again would lead to increased phenotypic heterogeneity among brain metastases (Fig. 4A, right scheme). Related to these potential mechanisms, we asked for the occurrence and dissemination of CD271⁺ cells among autopsied tumor samples of patients with multiple (n ≥ 2) brain metastases. Again, we found strong inter-patient heterogeneity of CD271 expression. Nevertheless, multiple brain metastases derived from one patient (T1) revealed a homogeneous distribution of CD271⁺ cells accompanied by a high expression of S100 but absence of MART1 (Fig. 4B and SI, Figure S15A). The relationship of CD271, S100 and MART1 was found in additional brain metastases of patient T2 (SI, Figure S15B). CD271 expression of tumors was distinct from neurons residing in the brain parenchyma. In addition, we observed infiltration of the adjacent brain parenchyma by migrating CD271⁺ cells (Fig. 4C), clearly suggesting that CD271⁺ cells are capable of seeding within the brain and potentially associated with the formation of multiple brain metastases. Next, we ascertained the presence of CD271⁺ cells in brain micrometastases of autopsied brain tissue samples (cerebellum, hippocampus, cortex) of a patient with additional metastases in liver, lung and spleen (Patient T3; SI, Table S2). We found CD271⁺ cells albeit with low frequency, in four out of six micrometastases of different regions, (Fig. 4D and SI, Figure S16A).

The dissemination of melanoma cells via the blood stream is not the only mechanism of distant metastasis. Besides this passive process, melanoma cells actively migrate along vessels by vessel co-option⁴². In brain metastases, we observed CD271⁺ cells adjacent to blood vessels as well as a clear, distinct staining of endothelial (CD31) and melanoma cells (CD271), (SI, Figure S16B). In addition, we very rarely observed CD271⁺ supposedly melanoma cells in a blood vessel (SI, Figure S16C) as well as a potential blood-vessel directed migration of CD271⁺ cells (SI, Figure S16D).

Expression of the microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF) is down-regulated in CD271^high brain metastases

Low expression of MITF has been associated with a more aggressive, stem like and tumor-initiating phenotype of melanoma cells^{43, 44}. We explored solitary (Patient 1) and multiple (Patient T1) melanoma BM with a CD271^high phenotype for expression of MITF by co-immunohistochemical staining. Basically, we observed a mutually exclusive expression pattern of CD271 and MITF and in addition a transition-state where expression of both markers was not clearly separated (Fig. 5A; Patient 1, BM). In multiple BM, MITF expression was not detected in areas strongly positive for CD271 (cortical metastasis). However, MITF was expressed in CD271 negative tumor areas adjacent to normal tissue in the cerebellar metastasis (Fig. 5A; Patient T1). Next, we determined the proportion of proliferating, Ki67⁺ cells in BM (n = 5) and EM (n = 6) and observed no correlation between CD271 expression and the proliferative state. Moreover, the non-proliferating CD271 expressing cells most likely constitute the stem-like subset, responsible for tumor progression as suggested previously⁴⁴. In fact, a minority (~7% on average) of CD271⁺ cells in BM was in a non-proliferative state (Fig. 5B, lower panel). To further validate the inverse correlation of CD271 and MITF expression, we evaluated MITF expression levels and performed GSEA of CD271^high and CD271^low BM (GSE50493, GSE44660). Indeed, we observed a higher expression of MITF in CD271^low BM as well as an enrichment of MITF target genes⁴³ (Fig. 5C-D). Furthermore, we found MITF target genes depleted in cells with forced expression of CD271 (NGFR) as well as a more aggressive phenotype of CD271^high A375 cells (A375^CD271/NGFR) and BM (CD271^high) by GSEA (Fig. 5E). In summary, these data suggest that the subset of CD271⁺ cells and brain metastases correlate with a MITF^low and more aggressive phenotype.

Discussion

Melanoma cell spreading to distant organs is still a challenge in melanoma therapy and associated with poor survival. Especially metastasis to the brain is frequently observed in melanoma patients and most likely presents a homing process of melanoma cells governed by specific cytokines or growth factors supplied by the brain tissue⁴⁵. However, mechanisms determining the brain metastatic capacity of melanoma cells are still poorly understood. Recently, we demonstrated that expression of the nerve growth factor receptor CD271 determines melanoma cell properties and discriminates PM and MET by regulation of CD271-responsive genes²⁷. Encouraged by the previous finding of increased expression of CD271 in BM as compared to EM⁹ we sought to evaluate as to whether the expression of CD271 and responsible genes indeed promote metastasis to the brain. Our initial analysis of brain and extracranial metastases showed a heterogeneous expression pattern of CD271 with a subset of CD271^high BM. This was in line with publicly available expression data of melanoma brain metastases. Exploration of public data of BM of two independent studies demonstrated that expression of CD271 was sufficient to define a BM-subset exhibiting distinct features e.g. enrichment of CD271-responsible genes including those involved in DNA-repair, a stem-like phenotype or genesis of cell projections. Regarding the pronounced plasticity of melanoma cells^{32, 46}, a high occurrence of CD271⁺ cells in melanoma BM may suggest that certain cellular phenotypes are possibly maintained in dependence of the prevailing microenvironment of tumors, epigenetic cues⁴⁷ or stress e.g. induced by therapeutic interventions⁴⁸ and may confer increased cell survival⁴⁹. Comparison of both CD271^high subsets revealed commonly regulated genes, associated with migration and metastasis. Since the number of BM of study GSE44660 was comparably low, we assumed this to be responsible for the low overlap of both studies. However, verification of individual genes common to both sets of CD271^high BM showed a significant difference among CD271^high and CD271^low BM, suggesting CD271 to determine properties of a BM subset.

Remarkably, the BRAF^V600E mutation intrinsically confers a high migratory phenotype to melanoma cells, which is blocked by the RAF-kinase inhibitor vemurafenib¹¹. Nevertheless, patients under vemurafenib therapy show a higher incidence of brain metastases¹² which is properly reasoned by the high brain metastatic potential of melanoma cells resistant to vemurafenib¹⁴. The latter cells show increased levels of CD271 which in turn is up-regulated via activation of the NFkB signaling pathway in BRAF-mutated melanoma cells¹³, most likely conferring increased migration. We observed a clear migratory phenotype of A375^GFP cells in vitro and ex vivo (semi-in vivo) in organotypic brain slices. In fact, we observed CD271⁺ cells showing long-distance migration through the slice. We attempted to exemplary quantify the number of A375^GFP cells showing a long-distance migration in the organotypic brain slice by counting of migrated cells. Nevertheless, an absolute quantification of migrating A375^GFP cells is hampered by the lack of detailed insight into rates of proliferation and apoptosis within the slice.

CD271 expression - like other melanoma markers - underlies phenotype switching responsible for fluctuations of CD271 expression^{44, 50}. We demonstrated that A375 cells with stable over expression of CD271 are indeed capable of migration in brain slices. This may suggest that a CD271⁺ phenotype of brain metastases is not necessarily acquired following colonization but rather predetermined by migrating CD271⁺ cells. This is underpinned by our previous observation that over expression of CD271 enhanced migration of A375 cells in vitro ²⁷, suggesting an additional effect of CD271, potentially superior to the effects driven by oncogenic BRAF. However, mechanisms of CD271-dependent cell migration processes remain elusive and further studies are needed to further explore this issue.

Exploration of CD271 and CD31 expression in solitary and multiple BM revealed that CD271⁺ cells are localized around CD31⁺ vessels. Although we also observed CD271⁺ cells inside a blood vessel, this observation was extremely rare but may suggest a hematogenous dissemination of CD271⁺ cells into the brain as well as their migration along blood vessels⁵¹ (reviewed in ref. 42). Additionally, lymphatic spread of melanoma cells is of major prognostic relevance and the presence of CD271⁺ cells in lymph node metastases suggest a dual mechanism of dissemination.

Mechanisms involved in melanoma cell metastasis have been described previously, e.g. involving the cytokine receptor CXCR4^{52, 53}. However, this issue seems to be more complex and is determined by multiple factors, e.g. melanoma cell plasticity. We previously identified a CD271-dependend regulation of FGF13, a special type of non-secreted fibroblast growth factors, suggested to regulate neuronal microtubule assembly and stabilization³³, migration, and chemo-resistance⁵⁴. Together, this might suggest a CD271/FGF13 axis as yet another regulatory mechanism of melanoma cell migration. In addition, we found other factors known to be involved in cell migration, regulated in a CD271-dependent manner, e.g. CSPG4^{34, 55} and HMGA2³⁵, strongly indicating that CD271 expression is a prerequisite for proper melanoma cell migration. To further unravel a potential connection of CD271 and cell migration, we sought to identify genes responsible to HMGA2 and CD271. Since expression data of HMGA2 knock-down melanoma cells were not available, we utilized expression data of a breast cancer cell line (MDA-MB-231) with HMGA2 knock-down³⁷ and identified HMGA2-responsible genes. Comparison of HMGA2- and CD271-responsible genes revealed a commonly regulated set of 130 genes, suggesting the indirect regulation of HMGA2 targets via CD271 and the potential existence of a HMGA2/CD271 network.

The proteoglycan CSPG4 is associated with cell migration or proliferation by regulation of small GTPases or fine-tuning of growth factor receptor signaling, respectively (reviewed in ref. 56). Due to the broad spectrum of signaling processes this receptor ties in, a reduced cell migration and cell-to ECM interaction seems to be a plausible consequence of the loss of CSPG4 expression. Since we observed co-expression of CSPG4 and CD271, a concerted action of both receptors may regulate melanoma cell properties. However, CSPG4 expression in metastases was not significantly higher as compared to primary melanoma. Although CD271 expression may facilitate melanoma cell migration, CD271 knock-down cells (BRAF wild type) retained a residual migratory capacity, suggesting that additional, CD271-independent factors determine melanoma cell migration. Since FGF13, CSPG4 and HMGA2 were not among the top up-regulated genes in the CD271^high subset of brain metastases, these factors may not be involved in melanoma brain metastasis.

The exploration of solitary and multiple brain metastases clearly demonstrated that CD271⁺ cells colonize and disseminate within the brain and are supposedly involved in distant and intracerebral metastasis. We observed that CD271^high BM showed a mutually exclusive expression of CD271 and MITF, hence a MITF^low phenotype. This was further supported by the finding that MITF-target genes were decreased in CD271^high tumors reasoning the low level of c-MET which is transcriptionally regulated by MITF⁵⁷. Hence, CD271^high melanoma BM comprise a potentially individual subset with increased aggressiveness, increased DNA-repair capacity, stem-like properties or tendency to undergo EMT, and may respond differentially to therapeutic interventions. Moreover, the correlation of CD271 expression and PI3K/AKT pathway activation adds another distinct feature of CD271^high brain metastases.

In summary, our data suggest that CD271 expressing cells represent a population with brain metastatic capacity, capable of brain colonization and dissemination within the brain. Brain metastatic CD271⁺ cells feature increased DNA-repair, stem-like properties and low expression of MITF and MITF-targets, e.g. c-MET. Nevertheless, we observed CD271⁺ cells not exclusively in brain metastases but also in extracranial metastases of different sites. Hence, the question of how CD271⁺ cells prioritize the route of dissemination, remains. However, the high abundance of CD271⁺ cells in melanoma metastases suggests CD271 as a principal mediator of melanoma cell spreading. In fact, it has recently been shown in a mouse model system¹⁰ that targeting of CD271 may restrict or even prevent dissemination of primary melanoma. Besides CD271, other yet not fully understood factors like the interaction of melanoma cells with astrocytes or neuroinflammation⁵⁸, seem to be prerequisites for the establishment of brain macrometastases.

Material and Methods

Patient cohorts

Archived (FFPE) matched pairs (n = 12) of extracranial (n = 13) and brain metastases (n = 12) including primary melanoma (n = 2) and unmatched extracranial (n = 1) and brain metastases (n = 7) were provided by the departments of pathology and neuropathology. Postmortem brains (n = 7) were taken 48 hours after death with informed consent from patients, and fixed in 4% neutral-buffered formalin for 2 weeks. Then brains were sectioned and tissue samples were taken for neuropathological examinations. Tumor samples were sectioned (2–4 µm) following paraffin embedding and stained for CD271. In addition hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) staining of sections was performed for histological expertise. All experimental methods were performed in accordance with the approved guidelines. The present study was approved by the ethics committee of the Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (EA2/175/16).

Cell culture

Patient-tumor derived cells (strain T20/02) as well as derivatives were cultured in Quantum 263 tumor growth medium (Q236, Capricorn Scientific, Germany) supplemented with 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Invitrogen, USA). A375 cells (ATCC CRL-1619, USA) as well as genetically engineered derivatives (GFP, CD271/NGFR) and MeWo cells (kind gift of Dr. Hermann Lage) were cultured in Leibovitz’s L-15 medium (Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% FBS, 1%, penicillin/streptomycin (Invitrogen), transferrin/fetuin, MEM-vitamines, insulin, glucose and sodium bicarbonate. Medium was changed every 3 days as described previously²⁷.

Organotypic slice cultures

Corticostriatal slice cultures were prepared from three-day-old mouse pups. Pups were sacrificed by instant decapitation. The brains were quickly removed and placed in a petri dish with ice cold Gibco Hanks’ Balanced Salt Solution. Both cerebral hemispheres were separated using a scalpel and sectioned coronally to 350 μm by a McIlwain tissue chopper (Mickle Laboratory, Cambridge, UK). The brain slices were separated under a dissection microscope (Leica S6 E) and placed on Millipore Millicell cell culture inserts (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA) in a 6-well-plate with 1 ml culture medium (Gibco® RPMI + 10% heat inactivated FBS + 1% pen/strep). All experimental protocols were approved by the department of neuropathology of the Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin and all experimental methods were performed in accordance with the approved guidelines.

Intracranial invasion assay

GFP/NGFR-GFP cells were washed with 5 ml of PBS. PBS was aspirated and 2 ml trypsin were added. The cells were incubated for 5 min, or until cells had detached, at 37 °C. 3 volumes of 10% FBS containing medium were added. The cells were centrifuged for 5 min at 1,100 rpm, medium was aspirated and cells were washed with PBS, a 50 μl aliquot of cells was saved for counting. After centrifugation, cells were re-suspended in fresh PBS to a concentration of 1 × 10⁴ cells/μl and transferred into a sterile Eppendorf tube. A WPI’s UltraMicroPump III (UMP3, World Precision Instruments, Sarasota, FL) and a 1 µl Hamilton microsyringe (Hamilton Company, Bonaduz, GR, Switzerland) were used to dispense 0.2 µl into the striatum. The injection was performed under a surgical microscope (Leica Wild M650) and GFP-positive tumor cells were visualized using fluorescent microscopy (Zeiss AxioObserver.Z1) every 24 hours. After 2 days the slices were fixed in 4% formaldehyde solution for 24 h at 4 °C.

Immunohistochemistry

Formaldehyde-fixed and paraffin-embedded tumors were sectioned to 2 µm, following de-waxing, peroxidase blocking and antigen-retrieval using EDTA buffer. Detection of CD271, CD31, Ki67, S100, vimentin, MITF, HMB45 and MART1/MLANA was performed with anti-CD271 (clone D4B3, XP, Cell signaling), anti-CD31 (clone JC/70A, Dako), anti-Ki67 (clone MIB1, Dako), anti-S100 (clone 15E2/E2, BioGenex), anti-vimentin (clone V9, Dako), anti-MITF (clones C5 + D5, Zytomed), anti-melanosom (clone HMB45, Dako) or anti-MART1 (clone A103, Dako) with an automated staining system (BenchMark Ultra, Ventana Medical Systems, USA). Histological staining was performed with hematoxylin/eosin (H&E, Merck). Immunohistochemical staining of two antigens was performed with the DakoCytomation kit (Dako).

Immunofluorescence and Confocal microscopy

Paraformaldehyde (PFA, 4%) fixed brain slices were mechanically removed, blocked (2% bovine serum albumin, BSA) and stained with either fluorescently (Phycoerythrin, PE) labeled or unlabeled anti-CD271 (Miltenyi, clone ME20.4–1.H4, mouse IgG1, or clone D4B3, XP, rabbit, 1:100, Cell signaling) and DAPI (4′,6-Diamidin-2-phenylindol, Sigma-Aldrich, 1:500), for 24 hours at 4 °C. Images were captured using Zeiss Axiovert40CFL with accompanied Illuminator HPX120C and software AxioVision Rel. 4.8 (all Carl Zeiss AG, Germany). Confocal images were captured with Leica TCS SP5 (Leica, Germany) using sequential scanning (z-stacking) at 200 Hz scan speed and 0.5 µm or 1 µm/stack. For immunofluorescence of tumors, sections were de-waxed followed by antigen-retrieval (citrate buffer pH = 6.0) for 20 min, washed in tris-buffered saline (TBS) and blocked in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) with 2% bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 1h. Sections were incubated with blocking buffer and primary antibodies vimentin (mAB, clone V9, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, USA) and CD271 (clone D4B3, XP, Cell signaling) for 1 h at RT or overnight at 4 °C. Sections were incubated for 1 h at RT with secondary antibodies AlexaFluor488 and 594 on second day, following washing of with PBS/Tween20 (0.1%). For cell-based immunofluorescence, cells were fixed directly on well plates, blocked with PBS/BSA and incubated with directly labeled antibodies CSPG4-FITC or CD271-PE (Miltenyi, Germany) or phalloidin-TRITC (Invitrogen) for 1h at RT.

BrdU labeling

Following incubation, cells were fixed with PFA (4%/PBS), permeabilized using triton-X100 (0.1%/PBS) for 10 minutes and incubated with hydrochloric acid (2.5 M) for 30 minutes at RT. Following, cells were blocked with BSA and stained with anti-BrdU or Ki67 antibody (0.5 µg/ml final, BD Bioscience, Cat. No. 347580 or abcam, Cat. No. 66155) for 1 h at room temperature (RT). Secondary antibodies (anti-mouse AlexaFluor594 (BrdU) or 488 (Ki67), final concentration 2ug/ml) were added and incubated for 1 hour at RT.

Immunoblot

Total cell lysates were prepared in SDS lysis buffer (1% SDS, 10 mM Tris-HCl, 2 mM EDTA). 10–25 µg of whole cell lysates were separated on 12% SDS-PAGE gels and transferred on a nitrocellulose membrane by using the iBlot Dry Blotting System (Invitrogen). Membranes were blocked with Odyssey Blocking Buffer/PBS-Tween (0.1%), (1:1, LI-COR Biosciences, USA) for 1 h. Incubation with primary antibodies (p75NTR clone D4B3XP® recognizing the total CD271, p-ERK1/2, ERK1/2, p-AKT(S473), AKT, and β-tubulin, clone 9F3; all 1:1000; from Cell Signaling Technology, Germany) was done overnight at 4 °C. Incubation with secondary antibodies donkey anti-rabbit IgG or donkey anti-mouse both (diluted 1:10000; LI-COR Biosciences, USA) was done for 1 h at RT. Signals were detected with the Odyssey Infrared Imaging System (LI-COR Biosciences, USA).

RNA isolation and qRT-PCR

RNA isolation of frozen cell pellets was performed with the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germany), following the manufacturers protocol. Reverse transcription of 2.0 µg total RNA was performed with the SuperScript VILO cDNA synthesis kit (Invitrogen, Germany) and diluted to a final volume of 50 µl. qRT-PCR was carried out on a Step one plus (Applied Biosystems, Germany) for 40 cycles. Primers were designed using the PrimerQuest Tool (http://eu.idtdna.com/ primerquest/home/index) for 55–60 °C annealing temperature and product size of 100–250 bp (SI, Table S4). qPCR expression levels were calculated as relative expression by ΔΔCT, normalized to HPRT (hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase 1).

Gene-set enrichment analysis (GSEA)

GSEA was performed with appropriate software (GSEA version 2.2.2) as well as signatures provided by the Broad institute (http://software.broadinstitute.org/gsea/index.jsp). Signatures specific for cell projections, focal adhesion, melanoma aggressiveness, DNA-repair, neural crest stem cells (NCSC) and EMT were received from the latest version of the Molecular Signatures Database v5.1 (MSigDB) of the Broad institute. Derivation of the CD271-responsive gene signature was performed as described previously²⁷. Genes for signatures specifying MITF-targets and brain metastatic cells were derived from publications^{14, 43}. Expression data of primary melanoma, extracranial metastases and brain metastases were obtained from GEO (Gene expression omnibus).

Data availability

The datasets analysed in the current study are available in the GEO database with accession numbers GSE7553 (skin cancer subtypes), GSE46517 (melanoma progression), GSE50493 (melanoma METs including brain METs, set 1), GSE44660 (brain METs set 2), GSE15605, GSE8401 (PM, MET), GSE52456 (shCD271, melanoma), GSE43741 (shHMGA2, breast cancer). CD271-responsive genes were extracted from data sets GSE78155: T20/02 (CD271/NGFR; Mock) A375 (CD271/NGFR; GFP) as well as GSE52456 (shCD271, T20/02) as reported previously³².

Meta-analysis

Pre-processed data (normalized, batch-corrected) were imported to excel, log2 transformed and filtered for significance p ≤ 0.05, determined by a two-sided, two-sample ttest for unequal variance. Tables containing significant expression data (log2) were imported in R-studio (R Ver. 3.3.2) and tested for Gaussian distribution (p ≥ 0.05) by Shapiro testing. Tumor samples mostly did not show a Gaussian distribution and p-values were determined by a Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Box plots were generated using the box plot function of the ggplot2 package in combination with the beeswarm function. Heat maps were generated with heat map function of the gplot package. Brain and extracranial metastases with highest or lowest expression were designated as CD271^high or CD271^low, respectively. For identification of commonly regulated genes, lists containing either most up- or down-regulated genes were compared with R’s merge function. Duplicate gene symbols were removed by data filtering in excel. Due to the low sample number of brain metastases (n = 7) of study GSE44660 p-values were determined by ttest.

References

Balch, C. M. et al. Final version of 2009 AJCC melanoma staging and classification. Journal of clinical oncology: official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 27, 6199–6206, doi:10.1200/JCO.2009.23.4799 (2009).
Article Google Scholar
Eyles, J. et al. Tumor cells disseminate early, but immunosurveillance limits metastatic outgrowth, in a mouse model of melanoma. The Journal of clinical investigation 120, 2030–2039, doi:10.1172/JCI42002 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Bonaventure, J., Domingues, M. J. & Larue, L. Cellular and molecular mechanisms controlling the migration of melanocytes and melanoma cells. Pigment cell & melanoma research 26, 316–325, doi:10.1111/pcmr.12080 (2013).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Damsky, W. E., Theodosakis, N. & Bosenberg, M. Melanoma metastasis: new concepts and evolving paradigms. Oncogene 33, 2413–2422, doi:10.1038/onc.2013.194 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Flanigan, J. C. et al. Melanoma brain metastases: is it time to reassess the bias? Curr Probl Cancer 35, 200–210, doi:10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2011.07.003 (2011).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Goulart, C. R., Mattei, T. A. & Ramina, R. Cerebral melanoma metastases: a critical review on diagnostic methods and therapeutic options. ISRN Surg 2011, 276908, doi:10.5402/2011/276908 (2011).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Silk, A. W., Bassetti, M. F., West, B. T., Tsien, C. I. & Lao, C. D. Ipilimumab and radiation therapy for melanoma brain metastases. Cancer medicine 2, 899–906, doi:10.1002/cam4.140 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Obenauf, A. C. & Massague, J. Surviving at a distance: organ specific metastasis. Trends Cancer 1, 76–91, doi:10.1016/j.trecan.2015.07.009 (2015).
Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
Guo, R. et al. Increased expression of melanoma stem cell marker CD271 in metastatic melanoma to the brain. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 7, 8947–8951 (2014).
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ngo, M. et al. Antibody Therapy Targeting CD47 and CD271 Effectively Suppresses Melanoma Metastasis in Patient-Derived Xenografts. Cell reports 16, 1701–1716, doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2016.07.004 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Lu, H. et al. Oncogenic BRAF-Mediated Melanoma Cell Invasion. Cell reports 15, 2012–2024, doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2016.04.073 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Haueis, S. A. et al. Does the distribution pattern of brain metastases during BRAF inhibitor therapy reflect phenotype switching? Melanoma research 27, 231–237, doi:10.1097/CMR.0000000000000338 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Lehraiki, A. et al. Increased CD271 expression by the NF-kB pathway promotes melanoma cell survival and drives acquired resistance to BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib. Cell discovery 1, 15030, doi:10.1038/celldisc.2015.30 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zubrilov, I. et al. Vemurafenib resistance selects for highly malignant brain and lung-metastasizing melanoma cells. Cancer Lett 361, 86–96, doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2015.02.041 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kim, J. et al. Tumor initiating but differentiated luminal-like breast cancer cells are highly invasive in the absence of basal-like activity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109, 6124–6129 (2012).
Witzel, I., Oliveira-Ferrer, L., Pantel, K., Muller, V. & Wikman, H. Breast cancer brain metastases: biology and new clinical perspectives. Breast cancer research: BCR 18, 8, doi:10.1186/s13058-015-0665-1 (2016).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Johnston, A. L. et al. The p75 neurotrophin receptor is a central regulator of glioma invasion. PLoS biology 5, e212, doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050212 (2007).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Bailey, C. M., Morrison, J. A. & Kulesa, P. M. Melanoma revives an embryonic migration program to promote plasticity and invasion. Pigment cell & melanoma research 25, 573–583, doi:10.1111/j.1755-148X.2012.01025.x (2012).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Miller, A. J. & Mihm, M. C. Jr. Melanoma. The New England journal of medicine 355, 51–65, doi:10.1056/NEJMra052166 (2006).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Riker, A. I. et al. The gene expression profiles of primary and metastatic melanoma yields a transition point of tumor progression and metastasis. BMC medical genomics 1, 13, doi:10.1186/1755-8794-1-13 (2008).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Raskin, L. et al. Transcriptome profiling identifies HMGA2 as a biomarker of melanoma progression and prognosis. The Journal of investigative dermatology 133, 2585–2592, doi:10.1038/jid.2013.197 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kabbarah, O. et al. Integrative genome comparison of primary and metastatic melanomas. PloS one 5, e10770, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010770 (2010).
Article PubMed PubMed Central ADS Google Scholar
Beretti, F. et al. CD271 is expressed in melanomas with more aggressive behaviour, with correlation of characteristic morphology by in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy. The British journal of dermatology 172, 662–668, doi:10.1111/bjd.13301 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Conacci-Sorrell, M. E. et al. Nr-CAM is a target gene of the beta-catenin/LEF-1 pathway in melanoma and colon cancer and its expression enhances motility and confers tumorigenesis. Genes & development 16, 2058–2072, doi:10.1101/gad.227502 (2002).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Yang, W. H. et al. RAC1 activation mediates Twist1-induced cancer cell migration. Nature cell biology 14, 366–374, doi:10.1038/ncb2455 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Payne, S. L. et al. Lysyl oxidase regulates breast cancer cell migration and adhesion through a hydrogen peroxide-mediated mechanism. Cancer research 65, 11429–11436, doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-1274 (2005).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Redmer, T. et al. The role of the cancer stem cell marker CD271 in DNA damage response and drug resistance of melanoma cells. Oncogenesis 6, e291, doi:10.1038/oncsis.2016.88 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Mi, R. et al. Identification of the metastasis potential and its associated genes in melanoma multinucleated giant cells using the PHA-ECM830 fusion method. Oncology reports 35, 211–218, doi:10.3892/or.2015.4376 (2016).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Fournier, P. G. et al. The TGF-beta Signaling Regulator PMEPA1 Suppresses Prostate Cancer Metastases to Bone. Cancer cell 27, 809–821, doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2015.04.009 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Tworkoski, K. et al. Phosphoproteomic screen identifies potential therapeutic targets in melanoma. Molecular cancer research: MCR 9, 801–812, doi:10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-10-0512 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Nishikawa, R. et al. Tumour-suppressive microRNA-29s directly regulate LOXL2 expression and inhibit cancer cell migration and invasion in renal cell carcinoma. FEBS letters 589, 2136–2145, doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2015.06.005 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Redmer, T. et al. The nerve growth factor receptor CD271 is crucial to maintain tumorigenicity and stem-like properties of melanoma cells. PloS one 9, e92596, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0092596 (2014).
Article PubMed PubMed Central ADS Google Scholar
Wu, Q. F. et al. Fibroblast growth factor 13 is a microtubule-stabilizing protein regulating neuronal polarization and migration. Cell 149, 1549–1564, doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.04.046 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sugimoto, Y. et al. Guidance of glial precursor cell migration by secreted cues in the developing optic nerve. Development 128, 3321–3330 (2001).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Shi, Z. et al. Silencing of HMGA2 suppresses cellular proliferation, migration, invasion, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in bladder cancer. Tumour biology: the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine 37, 7515–7523, doi:10.1007/s13277-015-4625-2 (2016).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Stahl, J. M. et al. Deregulated Akt3 activity promotes development of malignant melanoma. Cancer research 64, 7002–7010, doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-1399 (2004).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sun, M. et al. HMGA2/TET1/HOXA9 signaling pathway regulates breast cancer growth and metastasis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110, 9920–9925, doi:10.1073/pnas.1305172110 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central ADS Google Scholar
Wu, H. et al. Overexpression of ST3Gal-I promotes migration and invasion of HCCLM3 in vitro and poor prognosis in human hepatocellular carcinoma. OncoTargets and therapy 9, 2227–2236, doi:10.2147/OTT.S96510 (2016).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Chen, H. N. et al. PDLIM1 Stabilizes the E-Cadherin/beta-Catenin Complex to Prevent Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition and Metastatic Potential of Colorectal Cancer Cells. Cancer research 76, 1122–1134, doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-1962 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Cho, J. H. et al. AKT1 Activation Promotes Development of Melanoma Metastases. Cell reports 13, 898–905, doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2015.09.057 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Meier, F. et al. The RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK and PI3K/AKT signaling pathways present molecular targets for the effective treatment of advanced melanoma. Frontiers in bioscience: a journal and virtual library 10, 2986–3001 (2005).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Donnem, T. et al. Vessel co-option in primary human tumors and metastases: an obstacle to effective anti-angiogenic treatment? Cancer medicine 2, 427–436, doi:10.1002/cam4.105 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Network, T. C. G. A. T. Genomic Classification of Cutaneous Melanoma. Cell 161, 1681–1696, doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.044 (2015).
Article Google Scholar
Cheli, Y. et al. CD271 is an imperfect marker for melanoma initiating cells. Oncotarget 5, 5272–5283, doi:10.18632/oncotarget.1967 (2014).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Menter, D. G., Herrmann, J. L., Marchetti, D. & Nicolson, G. L. Involvement of neurotrophins and growth factors in brain metastasis formation. Invasion & metastasis 14, 372–384 (1994).
CAS Google Scholar
Quintana, E. et al. Phenotypic heterogeneity among tumorigenic melanoma cells from patients that is reversible and not hierarchically organized. Cancer cell 18, 510–523, doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2010.10.012 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Li, S. et al. Epigenetic regulation of CD271, a potential cancer stem cell marker associated with chemoresistance and metastatic capacity. Oncology reports 33, 425–432, doi:10.3892/or.2014.3569 (2015).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ravindran Menon, D. et al. A stress-induced early innate response causes multidrug tolerance in melanoma. Oncogene 34, 4448–4459, doi:10.1038/onc.2014.372 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Marchetti, D., Aucoin, R., Blust, J., Murry, B. & Greiter-Wilke, A. p75 neurotrophin receptor functions as a survival receptor in brain-metastatic melanoma cells. Journal of cellular biochemistry 91, 206–215, doi:10.1002/jcb.10649 (2004).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Boyle, S. E. et al. CD271 Expression on Patient Melanoma Cells Is Unstable and Unlinked to Tumorigenicity. Cancer research 76, 3965–3977, doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-2377 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Simonsen, T. G., Gaustad, J. V. & Rofstad, E. K. Intracranial Tumor Cell Migration and the Development of Multiple Brain Metastases in Malignant Melanoma. Translational oncology 9, 211–218, doi:10.1016/j.tranon.2016.04.003 (2016).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Scala, S. et al. Expression of CXCR4 predicts poor prognosis in patients with malignant melanoma. Clinical cancer research: an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research 11, 1835–1841, doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-1887 (2005).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Kim, M. et al. CXCR4 signaling regulates metastasis of chemoresistant melanoma cells by a lymphatic metastatic niche. Cancer research 70, 10411–10421, doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-2591 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Okada, T. et al. Upregulated expression of FGF13/FHF2 mediates resistance to platinum drugs in cervical cancer cells. Sci Rep 3, 2899, doi:10.1038/srep02899 (2013).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Benassi, M. S. et al. NG2 expression predicts the metastasis formation in soft-tissue sarcoma patients. Journal of orthopaedic research: official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society 27, 135–140, doi:10.1002/jor.20694 (2009).
Article Google Scholar
Price, M. A. et al. CSPG4, a potential therapeutic target, facilitates malignant progression of melanoma. Pigment cell & melanoma research 24, 1148–1157, doi:10.1111/j.1755-148X.2011.00929.x (2011).
Article CAS Google Scholar
McGill, G. G., Haq, R., Nishimura, E. K. & Fisher, D. E. c-Met expression is regulated by Mitf in the melanocyte lineage. The Journal of biological chemistry 281, 10365–10373, doi:10.1074/jbc.M513094200 (2006).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Schwartz, H. et al. Incipient Melanoma Brain Metastases Instigate Astrogliosis and Neuroinflammation. Cancer research 76, 4359–4371, doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0485 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Prof. Frank Heppner for the provision of tumor samples and infrastructure and Petra Matylewski for excellent technical assistance. In addition, we would like to thank Dr. Korinna Jöhrens for providing the MITF antibody, Dr. Stefanie Seifert for confocal microscopy based imaging and Dr. Susanne Kreuzer-Redmer for providing the microscope documentation system. JR is participant in the BIH-Charité Clinical Scientist Program funded by the Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin and the Berlin Institute of Health (BIH).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, D-69120, Heidelberg, Germany
Josefine Radke & Torben Redmer
Department of Neuropathology, Berlin, Germany
Josefine Radke
Laboratory of Molecular Tumor Pathology, Berlin, Germany
Torben Redmer
Institute of Pathology, Berlin, Germany
Florian Roßner & Torben Redmer
Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, D-10117, Berlin, Germany
Josefine Radke, Florian Roßner & Torben Redmer
Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
Josefine Radke

Authors

Josefine Radke
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Florian Roßner
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Torben Redmer
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

J.R. designed and performed experiments, F.R. collected tumor specimens and performed analyses, T.R. designed and performed experiments and wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Torben Redmer.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary information (SI)

Movie S1

Movie S2

Movie S3

Movie S4

Movie S5

Movie S6

Movie S7

Movie S8

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Radke, J., Roßner, F. & Redmer, T. CD271 determines migratory properties of melanoma cells. Sci Rep 7, 9834 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-10129-z

Download citation

Received: 10 April 2017
Accepted: 03 August 2017
Published: 29 August 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-10129-z

This article is cited by

Disrupting cellular memory to overcome drug resistance
- Guillaume Harmange
- Raúl A. Reyes Hueros
- Sydney M. Shaffer
Nature Communications (2023)
Decoding molecular programs in melanoma brain metastases
- Josefine Radke
- Elisa Schumann
- Torben Redmer
Nature Communications (2022)
Modelling Cell Invasion: A Review of What JD Murray and the Embryo Can Teach Us
- Paul M. Kulesa
- Jennifer C. Kasemeier-Kulesa
- Caleb Bailey
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology (2021)
Inactivating p53 is essential for nerve growth factor receptor to promote melanoma-initiating cell-stemmed tumorigenesis
- Leiwei Jiang
- Shibo Huang
- Hua Lu
Cell Death & Disease (2020)
CD271 is a molecular switch with divergent roles in melanoma and melanocyte development
- Fabian V. Filipp
- Chen Li
- Alexander D. Boiko
Scientific Reports (2019)

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.