Article | Open

3D Printed Silicones with Shape Memory

  • Scientific Reports 7, Article number: 4664 (2017)
  • doi:10.1038/s41598-017-04663-z
  • Download Citation
Published online:


Direct ink writing enables the layer-by-layer manufacture of ordered, porous structures whose mechanical behavior is driven by architecture and material properties. Here, we incorporate two different gas filled microsphere pore formers to evaluate the effect of shell stiffness and Tg on compressive behavior and compression set in siloxane matrix printed structures. The lower Tg microsphere structures exhibit substantial compression set when heated near and above Tg, with full structural recovery upon reheating without constraint. By contrast, the higher Tg microsphere structures exhibit reduced compression set with no recovery upon reheating. Aside from their role in tuning the mechanical behavior of direct ink write structures, polymer microspheres are good candidates for shape memory elastomers requiring structural complexity, with potential applications toward tandem shape memory polymers.


The 3D printing process employed in this work, also known as direct ink writing (DIW), enables the layer-by-layer manufacture of ordered, porous structures whose mechanical behavior is driven by architecture and material properties. We pursue hierarchical porosity as a means of lightweighting, tailoring mechanical response and introducing functionality into 3D printed silicones. Hierarchical porosity is achieved by a combining printed structural porosity with intrastrand porosity, obtained by adding hollow, gas-filled microspheres to the ink. Aside from their role in tuning the mechanical behavior of 3D printed architectures, polymer microspheres are good candidates for shape memory applications requiring structural complexity with the ability to achieve both open or closed cell porosity. Here, for the first time, we demonstrate that shape memory can be achieved in 3D printed porous elastomers simply by the addition of polymer microspheres with controlled shell glass transition temperatures.

Process development and fabrication of stochastic elastomeric foams is driven by diverse applications requiring advanced structural performance facilitated by both closed cells (e.g., shock absorption, acoustic damping and thermal insulation) and open cells (e.g., biocompatible membranes, tissue engineering scaffolds, semipermeable membranes for materials separation and food processing)1,2,3,4,5,6. This application space has benefitted from structural control, enabled by a family of emerging technologies, broadly known as 3D printing. Recently, 3D printing of silicones has been used to create mechanical energy absorbing materials with negative stiffness7, vascularized tissue constructs8, stretchable sensors9, soft robotics10, and shape morphing materials11. These advances are made possible by the flexible and stretchable nature of silicone elastomers, combined with the unique structural and compositional control enabled via 3D printing.

Applications benefitting from structurally engineered porosity accommodated by 3D printing include engineered tissue scaffolds12, photolithographic patterned nanowire growth for tailored electronics13, 14, and nanolithography metamaterials with a negative refractive index for cloaking and superlensing applications15, engineered with unit cells smaller than the wavelength of light16. In addition to their predictability, repeatability and potential for architectural complexity, ordered porous structures are desirable over stochastic foams from a long-term mechanical performance standpoint, due to their minimization of local stress concentrations which can result in localized material failure17.

Further spatial and temporal control can be achieved by 3D printing with shape memory polymers18. Since their development, in the 1960’s19, polymers with shape memory behavior20 have found applications in self-repairing components21, high performance textiles22, and surgical medicine23. More recent advancements in this field include shape memory polymers with elastomeric behavior at elevated temperatures24 and very large strain and energy storage capacities have been reported25,26,27.

In the field of net-shape processing, shape memory behavior can provide enhanced tunability and functionality to 3D printed objects, enabling controlled structural deformation to occur post-processing. Imbuing 3D printed objects with the ability to change their configuration in response to external stimuli is colloquially known as “4D printing”, where the fourth dimension is time28.

Our 3D printing approach enables property-specific tailoring, resulting in mechanical metamaterials that are tuned with constituent material behavior, porosity and structure7. Examples of 3D printed metamaterials can be found in ceramic29,30,31 and metallic32, 33 hierarchical lattice structures34 with mechanical behavior outside that of conventionally processed materials achieved through tuning levels of hierarchy, porosity and material constituents.


3D printed materials

In the 3D printing process, viscoelastic inks with highly controlled rheological behavior are extruded through a microscale nozzle or die, resulting in the layer-by-layer building of programmable architectures whose complexity is controlled by strand size and spanning distance over gaps in the underlying layers35. The former is influenced by the applied pressure, die geometry and rheological response of the resin, while the latter is a function of gel strength, deposition speed, shear rate and resin density36. Here, we pursue intrastrand porosity using a silicone based ink comprised of polymeric shell, gas filled microspheres or microballoons to further enhance the compressibility of porous elastomeric structures. Figure 1a–c illustrates the two different gas filled microballoon pore former particle size distributions used to evaluate the effect of shell stiffness and glass transition temperature, Tg (44° and 113°, see Figure S1), on compressive behavior and shape memory in our printed structures (Fig. 1d–g).

Figure 1
Figure 1

(a) Microballoon diameter size distribution, optical microscopy images of (b) Tg44 and (c) Tg113 microballoons, (d) schematic illustration of our 3D printing process, optical microscopy images of printed silicones with microballoons showing (e) x-y view, (f) x-z view and (g) high magnification image of (f) showing 25 vol% microballoons in a printed filament.

Rheological behavior

To achieve optimal elastomeric flow behavior for our composite inks, we performed stress-controlled rotational rheology experiments using a variety of conditions with a typical microballoon loading of 40 vol%. Under oscillatory flow at a frequency of 10 Hz (Fig. 2a), the effect of microballoon addition manifests as an increase in storage and loss moduli, accompanied by a slight increase in yield stress in the case of the Tg44 resin, while maintaining printability. No permanent die swell was observed through either measurement of printed strands or in situ measurement of flow near the die exit. This is attributable to power law behavior due to wall slip/plug flow (Fig. 2b), indicating that no configurational entropy is recovered upon nozzle exit.

Figure 2
Figure 2

Effect of microballoons on (a) rotational oscillatory response, (b) continuous flow behavior of the ink, and (c) response to compressive loading of the cast and printed structures.

Subtle influences of the pore former size distribution and volume loading on rheological behavior are observed; however, printability and structural repeatability is minimally affected. The DIW process, illustrated in Fig. 1d, highlights the potential of gas filled microballoons to substantially reduce the printed strand density, which can lead to enhanced strand spanning capability37.

Mechanical response

Gas filled microballoons provide a means of tuning the mechanical performance of 3D printed elastomers, beyond architecture; the lattice is limited by nozzle diameter, ink rheology and available extrusion pressure. To isolate the effect of structural porosity from intrastrand porosity, both bulk (cast) and printed structures were evaluated. In neat siloxane structures, printed in cross-ply (alternating 0° and 90° layered structures referred to as face-centered tetragonal or FCT38, Fig. 1d–g) and cast without microballoons, two regimes of compression response are observed. In the first regime (<40% ε in Fig. 2c), deformation is architecturally driven, accommodated by compaction and inlaying of upper layers in layers below. In the subsequent regime, deformation is driven by the strand material properties. The transition between the two will be referred to as structural “lock up”. This initial deformation mechanism of strand nestling in FCT printed structures has been investigated previously using in situ images acquired during compression loading and numerical simulations7.

Note that the inclusion of the Tg44 microballoons minimally affects the first regime of response, yet substantially lowers the material stiffness in the second regime (above 40% strain). This is attributed to the Tg44 microballoon compressibility, observed in cast resin filled with 40 vol% Tg44 microballoons. The cast resin filled with 40 vol% Tg113 microballoons is stiffer than the cast resin filled with 40 vol% Tg44 microballoons, indicating that the Tg113 microballoons are stiffer than the Tg44 microballoons. The bulk siloxane resin experiences comparatively little strain under applied loading, while cast siloxane filled with 40 vol% Tg113 and 40 vol% Tg44 microballoons undergoes 9% and 27% strain, respectively, under the same applied load. These strains are accommodated primarily through a nonlinear response at 1000 kPa and 300 kPa, respectively, attributed to yielding or breakage of the microballoons.

In the case of specimens cast with Tg113 microballoons, we attribute the lower stiffness observed above 0.5 MPa to fracture of the glassy microballoon shell. In printed structures filled with 40 vol% Tg113 microballoons, we observe a stiffer material response early on, leading us to conclude that, at 40 vol%, the glassy, rigid particles inhibit structural motion/strand nestling. This behavior is lessened in the 25 vol% Tg113 printed structure, which exhibits greater deformation below 600 kPa. The strain accommodated during the first regime is reduced, in this case, from ~40% to 35%. For 25 vol% and 40 vol% loading Tg113, the stiffness of the material above the lock-up stress (point at which structural porosity becomes very small) in the microballoon filled print is comparable to that of the neat resin print. Conversely, recall that the lower stiffness Tg44 microballoons do not increase structural resistance to compression; in fact, they result in a lower stiffness response throughout loading beyond structural lock up or interlayer compaction. These results are presented to illustrate the effect of microballoon mechanical properties on open cell printed structures.

Shape memory behavior

Shape memory evaluations, quantified by compression set, were performed by holding printed structures under compression during thermal soak, cooling under compression and releasing the compressive load (Fig. 3a), were performed to assess the long term effect of microballoon addition on structural performance. Percent recovery was determined as a ratio of the recovered thickness to the compressive deformation. Neat siloxane prints exhibited a small but measurable compression set at 40% and 60% strain when held at 70 °C for 70 h (Fig. 3c). This thickness change was somewhat recoverable after reheating to 70 °C for 30 min. The addition of Tg113 microballoons resulted in 20% reduction in thickness, following the same heating schedule at 40% and 60% strain. None of this deformation was recoverable after reheating to 70 °C for 30 min. The Tg44 microballoons resulted in 45% and 57% reduction in thickness, following the same heating schedule at 40% and 60% strain, respectively. This material experienced noticeable recovery upon reheating, recovering 10–15% thickness at 70 °C for 30 min. Complete thickness recovery was observed upon reheating to 110 °C for 2.5 h.

Figure 3
Figure 3

(a) Labeled schematic depicting the shape memory experiment, (b) optical microscopy images showing cross-sectional views of a printed structure with Tg44 microballoons at different stages of the shape memory experiment, (c) shape memory behavior following thermal soak under compressive strain at 70 °C for 70 hours, and (d) time dependent recovery behavior in the Tg44 microballoon prints near Tg and above Tg.

The ability to retain a compressed shape after thermally soaking and cooling and then recover the original shape upon unconfined reheating is a property associated with shape memory polymers (SMPs)39,40,41. Shape recovery of the 40 vol% Tg44 microballoon prints is dependent on soak and reheat temperatures (Fig. 3d). This effect is most pronounced at temperatures above the Tg of the microballoons. The shape recovery is evidenced by recovery of structural porosity and retention of microballoon spherical shape (Fig. 3b).


Elastomeric structures with shape memory behavior, accommodated by polymer shell microballoons were 3D printed and their influence on printability and structural performance was explored. Specifically, two different gas filled microballoons were selected to probe the effect of shell stiffness and Tg on compressive behavior and compression set in 3D printed structures. Introducing another level of porosity in the printed strands themselves enabled alteration of the mechanical response which was dependent on the microballoon shell stiffness. In the Tg44 system, we observe significant compression set at short holds at temperatures above Tg. While substantial recovery is observed at lower temperature reheats, complete structural recovery occurs upon reheating at elevated temperature (110 °C). This is attributed to re-expansion of the microballoons when heated above Tg, with shape retention accommodated by the cross-linked structure. We observe reduced compression set in the higher Tg system, and a lack of recovery upon reheating. In this way, we illustrate the ability to tune structural response using a hierarchical combination of open and closed cell porosity, in conjunction with variable Tg microballoon addition. The shape memory behavior exhibited by the Tg44 microballoon filled prints demonstrates their potential use in wearable protective padding and cushions with Tg optimized for human body temperature, in shape memory polymer matrices toward the development of tandem shape memory polymers capable of recovery in stages depending on the temperature42, 43. Future efforts to advance this work include multi-material printing and in-line mixing, to further tune structure, porosity and material properties.


Feedstock Materials

Polydimethylsiloxane resin (Dow Corning® SE 1700) with nanosilica filler for yield stress behavior and fracture toughness was used as the matrix phase in this study. The effect of microballoon shell material behavior on DIW structure compressibility was studied using two commercially available materials. Figure 1b depicts isobutane filled, thermally expanded poly(acrylonitrile-co-vinylidene chloride-co-methyl methacrylate) microballoons (AzkoNobel Expancel® 551 DE 40 d42) with a gas displacement density of 0.042 g/cc. These microballoons possess a glass transition temperature, Tg, of 44 °C, measured using thermomechanical analysis (see Supplementary Figure 1a), rather than dynamic scanning calorimetry due to their extremely light weight. Figure 1c shows phenol formaldehyde resin shell microballoons (Asia Pacific Microballoons BJO-0930) with a liquid displacement density of 0.21–0.25 g/cc. Phenolic microballoons possess a Tg of 113 °C, measured using dynamic scanning calorimetry (see Supplementary Figure 1b).

Particle cross-sectional areas were measured using automated transmitted light microscopy (Malvern Morphologi G3) and the particle size distribution was calculated assuming the particles are spherical. Hence, we report a circular effective diameter value in Fig. 1a. Despite the difference in particle size distribution between the two microballoon lots, shell thickness for each was measured to be 1–2 μm using scanning electron microscopy and optical microscopy of fractured particles. Note that there are a significant fraction of doublets and triplets in the Tg113 system, as opposed to the Tg44 system.

DIW Ink Preparation

A volumetric loading of 40% microballoons in the silica filled siloxane resin was used as a standard to compare the two microballoon materials. This selection was made on the basis that 40 vol% filler content should not result in significant jamming and thickening behavior given the broad size distributions44, yet it should have a significant impact on the overall mechanical performance of printed structures.

Resin was prepared by blending 40 vol% microballoons into the siloxane base resin (SE 1700 Part A base) using a vacuum gravitational mixer (Thinky ARV 310) at 2000 rpm for 1 min. After this time, the microballoon resin mixture was hand mixed, followed by another round of non-contact mixing under vacuum at 2000 rpm for 1 min. While no noticeable heating occurred during blending, the material was allowed to cool in a standing water bath for 5 min, prior to non-contact mixing of SE1700 Part B curing agent at 2000 rpm for 20 s. The microballoon suspension was transferred to a 30 cc syringe for printing.

Ink Rheology

The effect of microballoon addition on the rheological behavior of siloxane resin was evaluated using rotational rheology (TA Instruments AR 2000ex equipped with cross-hatched parallel plates to prevent microballoon compression and mitigate wall slip effects). Oscillatory experiments (Fig. 2a) were performed at 10 Hz and power law behavior was observed under continuous flow (Fig. 2b).

DIW Printing

Printing was performed using a displacement controlled 3-axis 3D printing platform, resulting in cross-ply structures with each subsequent layer fashioned at a 90° angle from the one prior. This structure is referred to as face-centered tetragonal (FCT) and is discussed in detail by Maiti et al.45. A 250 µm nozzle was used to produce these prints, which were 50 × 50 mm squares at 8 layers thick. Printed structures were oven cured under a nitrogen purge for 6 h at 60 °C, followed by 1 h at 150 °C and a post cure at 125 °C for 12 h. These structures possessed overall densities of 0.50 g/cc and 0.42 g/cc using 40 vol% of the Tg113 and Tg44 microballoons, respectively.

Thermal and Mechanical Characterization

Mechanical response was evaluated under compressive loading supplied by a Instron 5944 universal testing frame equipped with a 2 kN load cell. Strain was measured using a 0.5″ strain gage extensometer on 2.2 cm (7/8 in) diameter, 1.6 mm thick printed FCT specimens. Compression set was assessed on printed FCT structures punched to 13 mm diameter and 1.6 mm thick (8 layers). Following ASTM D395, printed structures were compressed to 40% and 60% strain and soaked at 70 °C for 70 h, cooled under compression, released and allowed to relax for 10 min, prior to measurement. To evaluate recovery, specimens were reheated at temperatures equal to or greater than that of the compressed soak for a series of times until no further structural changes were observed.

Additional Information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


  1. 1.

    Shimazaki, Y., Nozo, S. & Inoue, T. Shock-absorption properties of functionally graded EVA laminates for footwear design. Polymer Testing 54, 98–103 (2016).

  2. 2.

    Zhang, Z. H., Provis, J. L., Reid, A. & Wang, H. Mechanical, thermal insulation, thermal resistance and acoustic absorption properties of geopolymer foam concrete. Cem. Concr. Compos 62, 97–105 (2015).

  3. 3.

    Rodriguez, J. N. et al. In vivo response to an implanted shape memory polyurethane foam in a porcine aneurysm model. J Biomed Mater Res A 102(5), 1231–42 (2014).

  4. 4.

    Mrozek, R. A., Gold, C. S., Leighliter, B., Sietins, J. M. & Lenhart, J. L. Open pore, elastomeric scaffolds through frustrated particle collapse. J. Mater. Sci. 51, 10761–10774 (2016).

  5. 5.

    Nam, Y. S., Yoon, J. J. & Park, T. G. A novel fabrication method of macroporous biodegradable polymer scaffolds using gas foaming salt as a porogen additive. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 53(1), 1–7 (1999).

  6. 6.

    Jennings, J. L. inventor; Universal Oil Prod. Co., assignee. Combined foam flotation and membrane separation processing US 3917526 A. 1975 Nov 4

  7. 7.

    Duoss, E. B. et al. Three-dimensional printing of elastomeric, cellular architectures with negative stiffness. Adv. Funct. Mater. 24, 4905 (2014).

  8. 8.

    Kolesky, D. B. et al. 3D bioprinting of vascularized, heterogeneous cell-laden tissue constructs. Adv. Mater. 26, 3124 (2014).

  9. 9.

    Muth, J. T. et al. Embedded 3D printing of strain sensors with highly stretchable elastomers. Adv. Mater. 26, 6307 (2014).

  10. 10.

    Wehner, M. et al. An integrated design and fabrication strategy for entirely soft, autonomous robots. Nature 536, 451 (2016).

  11. 11.

    Gladman, A. S., Matsumoto, E. A., Nuzzo, R. G., Mahadevan, L. & Lewis, J. A. Biomimetic 4D printing. Nature Mater. 15, 413 (2016).

  12. 12.

    Hutmacher, D. W. Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage. Biomaterials 21, 2529 (2000).

  13. 13.

    Javey, A., Nam, S. W., Friedman, R. S., Yan, H. & Lieber, C. M. Layer-by-layer assembly of nanowires for three-dimensional, multifunctional electronics. Nano Lett. 7, 773 (2007).

  14. 14.

    Kim, D. H. et al. Stretchable and foldable silicon integrated circuits. Science 320, 507 (2008).

  15. 15.

    Zhang, X. & Liu, Z. Superlenses to overcome the diffraction limit. Nat. Mater. 7, 435 (2008).

  16. 16.

    Liu, N. et al. Three-dimensional photonic metamaterials at optical frequencies. Nat. Mater. 7, 31 (2008).

  17. 17.

    Maiti, A. et al. 3D printed cellular solid outperforms traditional stochastic foam in long-term mechanical response. Sci. Rep. 6, 24871 (2016).

  18. 18.

    Ge, Q. et al. Multimaterial 4D printing with tailorable shape memory polymers. Scientific Reports 6, 31110 (2016).

  19. 19.

    Crofts, D., inventor; Raychem Corp., assignee. Improvements in and relating to the production of articles having plastic memory. United Kingdom patent GB 99,0235-A. 1965 Apr 28.

  20. 20.

    Lendlein, A. & Kelch, S. Shape-memory polymers. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 41, 2034 (2002).

  21. 21.

    Li, G. & Nettles, D. Thermomechanical characterization of a shape memory polymer based self-repairing syntactic foam. Polymer 51, 755 (2010).

  22. 22.

    Ohki, T., Ni, Q.-Q., Ohsako, N. & Iwamoto, M. Mechanical and shape memory behavior of composites with shape memory polymer. Compos. Part A-Appl. S. 35, 1065 (2004).

  23. 23.

    Lendlein, A. & Langer, R. Biodegradable, elastic shape memory polymers for potential biomedical applications. Science 296, 1673 (2002).

  24. 24.

    Raidt, T., Hoeher, R., Meuris, M., Katzenberg, F. & Tiller, J. C. Ionically cross-linked shape memory polymers. Macromolecules 49(18), 6918–6927 (2016).

  25. 25.

    Heuwers, B., Beckel, A., Krieger, A., Katzenberg, F. & Tiller, J. C. Shape-memory natural rubber: An exceptional material for strain and energy storage. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 214(8), 912–932 (2013).

  26. 26.

    Hoeher, R., Raidt, T., Rose, M., Katzenberg, F. & Tiller, J. C. Recoverable strain storage capacity of shape memory polyethylene. J. Polym. Sci. Part B Polym. Phys 51(13), 1033–1040 (2013).

  27. 27.

    Lewis, C. L., Meng, Y. & Anthamatten, M. Well-defined shape-memory networks with high elastic energy capacity. Macromolecules 48(14), 4918–4926 (2015).

  28. 28.

    Khoo, Z. X. et al. 3D printing of smart materials: A review on recent progresses in 4D printing. Virtual Phys. Prototyp. 10, 103 (2015).

  29. 29.

    Jang, D., Meza, L. R., Greer, F. & Greer, J. R. Fabrication and deformation of three-dimensional hollow ceramic nanostructures. Nature Mater. 12, 893 (2013).

  30. 30.

    Meza, L. R., Das, S. & Greer, J. R. Strong, lightweight, and recoverable three-dimensional ceramic nanolattices. Science 345, 1322 (2014).

  31. 31.

    Bauer, J., Hengsbach, S., Tesari, I., Schwaiger, R. & Kraft, O. High-strength cellular ceramic composites with 3D microarchitecture. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 2453 (2014).

  32. 32.

    Zheng, X. et al. Ultralight, ultrastiff mechanical metamaterials. Science 344, 1373 (2014).

  33. 33.

    Zheng, X. et al. Multiscale metallic metamaterials. Nature Mater. 15, 1100 (2016).

  34. 34.

    Meza, L. R. et al. Resilient 3D hierarchical architected metamaterials. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112, 11502 (2015).

  35. 35.

    Lewis, J. A. Direct ink writing of 3D functional materials. Adv. Funct. Mater. 16, 2193 (2015).

  36. 36.

    Smay, J. E., Cesarano, J. III & Lewis, J. A. Colloidal inks for directed assembly of 3-D periodic structures. Langmuir 18, 5429 (2002).

  37. 37.

    Zhu, C. & Smay, J. E. Catenary shape evolution of spanning structures in direct-write assembly of colloidal gels. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 212, 727 (2012).

  38. 38.

    Lewis, J. A. & Gratson, G. M. Direct writing in three dimensions. Materials Today 7(7–8), 32–39 (2004).

  39. 39.

    Wilson, T. S. et al. Shape memory polymers based on uniform aliphatic urethane networks. J. Appl. Polym. Sci 106, 540 (2007).

  40. 40.

    Small, W. S. IV, Singha, P., Wilson, T. S. & Maitland, D. J. Biomedical applications of thermally activated shape memory polymers. J. Mater. Chem. 20, 3356 (2010).

  41. 41.

    Hearon, K. et al. Porous shape-memory polymers. Polymer Reviews 53, 41 (2013).

  42. 42.

    Liu, C., Qin, H. & Mather, P. T. Review of progress in shape-memory polymers. J. Mater. Chem. 17, 1543 (2007).

  43. 43.

    Mather, P. T., Qin H. (The University of Connecticut) World Pat. 2005-US29351, 2006086011, (2005).

  44. 44.

    Wagner, N. J. & Brady, J. F. Shear thickening in colloidal dispersions. Physics Today 62, 27 (2009).

  45. 45.

    Maiti, A., Weisgraber, T. H. & Gee, R. H. Technical Report LLNL-TR-661699 (2014)

Download references


This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344. This document has been assigned the release ID #LLNL-JRNL-716517. The authors gratefully acknowledge David Urabe for mechanical characterization, Mark Pearson for thermal analysis, Lemuel Perez Perez for rheological characterization of the Tg113 resin and Sabrina Fletcher for the graphical depiction of the DIW process. The authors also acknowledge Nishana Moodley from Azko Nobel N. V. for helpful discussions and for providing the Expancel® particles used in this study.

Author information


  1. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Materials Engineering Division, Livermore, CA, 94550, USA

    • Amanda S. Wu
    • , Taylor M. Bryson
    • , Emily Cheng
    • , Thomas R. Metz
    •  & Eric B. Duoss
  2. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Materials Science Division, Livermore, CA, 94550, USA

    • Ward Small IV
    •  & Thomas S. Wilson
  3. Department of Energy’s National Security Campus, managed by Honeywell, Materials Engineering, Kansas City, MO, 64147, USA

    • Stephanie E. Schulze


  1. Search for Amanda S. Wu in:

  2. Search for Ward Small IV in:

  3. Search for Taylor M. Bryson in:

  4. Search for Emily Cheng in:

  5. Search for Thomas R. Metz in:

  6. Search for Stephanie E. Schulze in:

  7. Search for Eric B. Duoss in:

  8. Search for Thomas S. Wilson in:


Amanda S. Wu wrote the main manuscript text. Ward Small IV provided expertise in shape memory polymer characterization and revised the manuscript. Eric B. Duoss and Thomas S. Wilson guided the experiments reported herein. Taylor M. Bryson and Emily Cheng performed experiments and characterization effort. Stephanie Schulze collaborated and assisted with materials selection. Thomas R. Metz is responsible for all printing performed to support these experiments. All authors have reviewed the manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amanda S. Wu.

Supplementary information


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Creative Commons BY

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit