Abstract
Breeding yeast strains for industrial alcoholic fermentation requires laborious screening due to the lack of in vivo modification strategies. Here we show that quiescence-specific cell wall thickening via synthesis of a major component, 1,3-β-glucan, critically antagonizes cellular fermentation ability by sequestering the available cytoplasmic carbon sources. This study provides insights into glycolytic control and reports an effective and reliable rational fermentation design.
Similar content being viewed by others
The current understanding of glycolysis comes from the study of yeast alcoholic fermentation1. Glycolytic control is a central issue in cellular metabolism2. The robustly optimized glycolytic behavior of yeast, known as the Crabtree effect3, hinders the development of breeding technology for altering the alcoholic fermentation capacity. Protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) complexed with the B55δ-type regulatory subunit (Cdc55p) is solely responsible for the outstanding glycolytic activity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae sake yeast strains4. High glucose levels activate PP2AB55δ in both yeasts and mammals. In humans, hepatic glucose metabolism triggers PP2AB55δ-dependent dephosphorylation of phosphofructokinase-2/fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase, promoting the production of the key glycolytic activator, fructose-2,6-bisphosphate5,6. In S. cerevisiae, however, its role in the glycolytic control remains questionable7. Therefore, the mechanism underlying PP2AB55δ-mediated yeast alcoholic fermentation remains unknown.
RNA-seq of S. cerevisiae cdc55Δ cells, specifically defective in the PP2AB55δ function, on entry into cellular quiescence at the initial fermentation stage revealed upregulation of stress-responsive genes under the control of redundant transcription factors, such as Msn2p, Msn4p (Msn2/4p), and Gis1p, functionally associated with mammalian FoxO8 (Supplementary Fig. 1, Supplementary Tables 1 and 2). Loss of Cdc55p led to a significant increase in the expression of these genes in an Msn2/4p-dependent manner (Fig. 1a, b, Supplementary Fig. 2). This was unexpected because loss of Cdc55p reduces the acute stress-responsive expression of identical genes in exponentially proliferating cells (Supplementary Fig. 3)9. Therefore, PP2AB55δ exhibits opposing effects in Msn2/4p activation in the quiescence and proliferation phases (Supplementary Fig. 4). Deletion of MSN2/4 genes in the cdc55Δ background almost fully recovered the poor fermentation phenotype (Fig. 1c and Supplementary Fig. 5), suggesting that Msn2/4p is a major glycolytic inhibitor.
Msn2/4p upregulates genes of the UDP-glucose synthesis pathway, which directly branches from glycolysis via glucose-6-phosphate10. UDP-glucose is mostly used as a substrate for the biosynthesis of trehalose, glycogen, and 1,3-β-glucan in S. cerevisiae. Cytoplasmic trehalose and glycogen shunts are transiently activated upon acute stress or quiescence entry; therefore, deletion of neither trehalose nor glycogen synthesis genes contributes positively to alcoholic fermentation11. In contrast, 1,3-β-glucan accumulates during the fermentation period and its extracellular degradation does not immediately refuel glycolysis. Thus, 1,3-β-glucan synthesis in quiescent cells may be involved in metabolic control through the discharge of fermentable carbon sources into the extracellular space. Cell wall quantification (Fig. 1d) and transmission electron microscopy (Fig. 1e) revealed marked 1,3-β-glucan thickening in fermenting cdc55Δ cells and its complete absence in cdc55Δ msn2/4Δ cells, inversely correlated with the fermentation rates. Therefore, hyperactivated 1,3-β-glucan synthesis is responsible for the poor fermentation phenotype of cdc55Δ cells.
The 1,3-β-glucan synthesis pathway in S. cerevisiae, defined in proliferative cells, comprises the cell wall sensor, Wsc1p, guanine nucleotide exchange factor Rom2p, and regulatory (Rho1p) and catalytic (Fks1/2p) subunits of 1,3-β-glucan synthase12. Quantification of 1,3-β-glucan in fermenting cells revealed a similar pathway; however, the responsible cell wall sensors were homologous Wsc3/4p (Fig. 2a). Expression of the WSC3/4 genes was significantly induced under the control of Msn2/4p (Supplementary Fig. 6), indicating that Wsc3/4p is a quiescence-specific cell wall sensor (Supplementary Fig. 7). Deletion of WSC3, WSC4, ROM2, FKS1, or FKS2, but not wsc1Δ, significantly increased the fermentation rate (Fig. 2b and Supplementary Fig. 8, 9). Therefore, cell wall 1,3-β-glucan has a pivotal role in carbon/energy storage in S. cerevisiae.
To address fermentation design without genetic modification (GM) techniques, ethylmethanesulfonate-mutagenized mutants of the laboratory strain, X2180 and the industrial sake yeast strain, K701, which had acquired a high tolerance against caspofungin, a lipopeptide antifungal 1,3-β-glucan synthase inhibitor13, were obtained (Fig. 2c). These caspofungin-tolerant mutants exhibited slower fermentation rates (Fig. 2d, Supplementary Fig. 10, 11) and lower ethanol yields than the parental strains (Fig. 2e). The mutation did not significantly affect other major sake parameters (e.g. total acid and amino acid affecting the taste and ester compounds affecting the aroma) in the sake brewing test. Post-fermentation physical processes, such as vacuum distillation and reverse osmosis, are widely used to industrially reduce ethanol in alcoholic beverages to meet quality, financial, or health demands14,15. The fermentation design developed for S. cerevisiae successfully altered ethanol content without affecting the overall sensory balance and quality of alcoholic beverages. We also note that a non-GM mutant less tolerant to caspofungin achieved a further higher fermentation rate than K701; this finding could be promising for efficient bioethanol production (Supplementary Fig. 12).
The economic importance of alcoholic fermentation is acceleratingly increasing in terms of not only brewing/winemaking but also industrial production of biofuels and non-fuel ethanol. However, sufficient attention has not been paid to fermentation performance of individual yeast cells so far. Our study identified yeast cell wall as an untouched carbon reservoir to be rationally modified for improving the cost and efficiency of ethanol production. This idea could have important implications for any kind of bioproduction using polysaccharide-enveloped microorganisms, such as fungi, algae, and bacteria16,17. Cell wall-targeted carbon metabolic engineering is a challenge for efficient and sustainable biomanufacturing. Our goal is deep understanding the whole map of the regulatory mechanism for alcoholic fermentation in S. cerevisiae. Since we expect that various molecular mechanisms are involved, truly “rational design” should be possible by integrating our understanding of these mechanisms. We believe that this study is the key first step toward that end.
Methods
Yeast strains
Saccharomyces cerevisiae laboratory strain BY4741 and its single-deletion mutants, wsc1Δ, wsc2Δ, wsc3Δ, wsc4Δ, mid2Δ, mtl1Δ, rom1Δ, rom2Δ, fks1Δ, fks2Δ, and fks3Δ, were obtained from the European Saccharomyces cerevisiae Archive for Functional Analysis (Euroscarf), Germany. Disruption of the MSN2/4 genes in BY4741 was performed using a PCR-based method18 with the gene-specific primer pairs, MSN2 + URA3-Fw (5'-GTA TCT TCC TCA TAT TTT TCG GGA AGA TCA CAA CAG TAG CAA GGT ATT TCA TAC GCC AAG AGG CTA CGA TTC GGT AAT CTC CGA G-3')/MSN2 + URA3-Rv (5'-AAC AAT AAG CCG TAA GCT TCA TAA GTC ATT GAA CAG AAT TAT CTT ATG AAG AAA GAT CTA CGA ATT AGT AAT AAC TGA TAT AAT TAA ATT G-3') and Fw Dmsn4-kanMX (5'-TTC GGC TTT TTC TTT TCT TAT TAA AAA CAA TAT AAT GGG TAA GGA AAA GAC TCA-3')/Rv Dmsn4-kanMX (5'-TAG CTT GTC TTG CTT TTA TTT GCT TTT GAC CTT ATT TTT AGA AAA ACT CAT CGA GCA-3') to generate BY4741 msn2Δ::URA3 msn4Δ::kanMX (BY4741 msn2/4Δ). The BY4741 MSN2-GFP::HIS3 strain was kindly provided by Prof. Ted Powers (Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California, Davis). Disruption of CDC55 or RIM15 was performed as previously described4. Yeast cells were grown in YPD medium (1% yeast extract, 2% peptone, and 2% glucose) at 30 °C.
Sake yeast strain Kyokai no. 701 (K701) was provided by the Brewing Society of Japan (SBJ). To isolate the caspofungin-tolerant sake yeast strain, K701 was grown in YPD medium at 30 °C upto the stationary phase; 2.5 mL of cell suspension was mixed with 125 μL of 5% ethyl methanesulfonate in phosphate buffer (pH 7.0). After 60 min, 2.6 mL of 10% sodium thiosulfate was added to stop mutagenesis. The cells were collected, washed twice with sterile water, and plated on YPD agar plates containing 5 μg/mL caspofungin. The plates were incubated at 30 °C; a robustly growing colony was isolated as a caspofungin-tolerant mutant strain.
RNA-seq analysis
BY4741 wild-type and cdc55Δ cells were precultured in YPD medium overnight at 30 °C, inoculated into 50 mL of YPD20 medium (1% yeast extract, 2% peptone, and 20% glucose) at a final optical density at a wavelength of 600 nm (OD600) of 0.1, and then further incubated at 30 °C without shaking for 6 h. Then, the cells were collected, immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen, and subjected to total RNA extraction and RNA-seq analysis in the Bioengineering Lab. Co., Ltd. (Sagamihara, Japan). Total RNA was extracted using RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The integrity of total RNA was assessed via a 5200 Fragment Analyzer System (Agilent) run using the Agilent HS RNA Kit (Agilent), and only RNAs with RNA integrity numbers (RIN) above 9.5 were used for subsequent treatments and sequencing. After rRNA depletion using riboPOOL (siTOOLs Biotech), circularized DNA libraries were prepared using MGIEasy RNA Directional Library Prep Set (MGI Tech) and MGIEasy Circularization Kit (MGI Tech), and then sequenced using a DNBSEQ-G400 sequencer (MGI Tech). Approximately 30 million pair-end reads (2 × 100 bp) were sequenced for each sample. Raw sequences were demultiplexed using Cutadapt. The sequencing reads were mapped to the S. cerevisiae S288C reference genome using hisat2 (ver. 2.2.1). After normalization using iDEGES19, differentially expressed genes (DEGs; cutoff q-value < 0.05) were identified using the R package edgeR20. The gene expression data are shown as reads per kilobase of transcript per million mapped reads (RPKM).
qRT-PCR analysis
To test gene expression under acute stress, yeast cells were pre-cultured in YPD medium overnight at 30 °C, inoculated into 60 mL of YPD medium at a final OD600 of 0.1, and further incubated at 30 °C with vigorous shaking until the OD600 reached ~1.0. Half of the cell suspension was treated with high osmotic stress (0.4 M NaCl) for 30 min. To test gene expression under fermentative conditions, yeast cells were precultured in YPD medium overnight at 30 °C, inoculated into YPD20 medium at a final OD600 of 0.1, and further incubated at 30 °C without shaking for 24 h. Then, the cells were collected, immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen, and subjected to total RNA extraction using an RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen). cDNA was synthesized using a high-capacity cDNA reverse transcription kit (Applied Biosystems). Each PCR mix (25 μL) contained cDNA (10 ng), 0.1 M primers, and 12.5 μL PCR master mix (2x SYBR Green qPCR master mix; Thermo Fisher Scientific). The primers pairs used are listed in Supplementary Table 3. Gene-specific quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed on a LightCycler 96 system (Roche Diagnostics). Delta cycle threshold (ΔCT) values were calculated by subtracting the ΔCT value of the ACT1 gene from the ΔCT value for each target gene. Fold-changes were calculated using the 2-ΔΔCT method21.
Fluorescent microscopy
BY4741 wild-type or cdc55Δ strain expressing Msn2p-GFP was pre-cultured in YPD medium overnight at 30 °C, inoculated into YPD20 medium at a final OD600 of 0.1, and further incubated at 30 °C without shaking for 24 h. Collected cells were immediately observed under a fluorescent microscope Axiovert 200 M (Carl Zeiss) for GFP signal. Images were captured with a HBO 100 Microscope Illuminating System (Carl Zeiss) digital camera.
Fermentation tests
To determine the fermentation rates in YPD20 medium, yeast cells were precultured in YPD medium at 30 °C overnight, inoculated into 50 mL of YPD20 medium at a final OD600 of 0.1, and then further incubated at 30 °C without shaking. Fermentation progression was monitored continuously by measuring the volume of evolved carbon dioxide gas using a Fermograph II apparatus (Atto). To determine fermentation rates during sake making, a single-step sake mash was prepared by mixing 36.4 g pregelatinized rice, 9.6 g dried koji (rice cultivated with Aspergillus oryzae), 50 μL of 90% lactic acid, and 87 mL water containing yeast cells at a final OD600 of 1.0; this was incubated at 15 °C for 24 d without shaking. Fermentation was monitored continuously by measuring the weight loss of sake mash. Ethanol concentrations and other sake parameters were determined using the standard methods established by the National Tax Agency of Japan (Official Analysis Method of National Tax Agency (in Japanese)).
Quantification of 1,3-β-glucan
Yeast cell wall 1,3-β-glucan was quantified using a β-glucan assay kit (yeast and mushroom; Megazyme), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. All data were normalized to the wet weight of the cell pellets.
TEM
Electron microscopy was performed by Tokai Electron Microscopy, Inc. (Nagoya, Japan) based on a rapid freezing and freeze-fixation method. Yeast cell pellets sandwiched between copper disks were quickly frozen in liquid propane at −175 °C and then treated with 2% glutaraldehyde, 1% tannic acid in ethanol, and 2% distilled water at -80 °C for 48 h. The samples were dehydrated using anhydrous ethanol, infiltrated with a 1:1 mixture of propylene oxide and resin (Quetol-651; Nisshin EM Co., Tokyo, Japan) at room temperature for 3 h, then infiltrated with 100% Quetol-651 at room temperature for 3 h, followed by polymerization at 60 °C for 48 h. The polymerized resins were ultra-thin-sectioned at a thickness of 70 nm using an ultramicrotome (Ultracut UCT; Leica). The sections were placed on copper grids, which were subjected to staining with 2% uranyl acetate for 15 min and with lead stain solution (Sigma-Aldrich) for 3 min. The samples were observed using a transmission electron microscope (JEM-1400 Plus; JEOL). Images were acquired using a charge-coupled device (CCD) camera (EM-14830RUBY2; JEOL).
Statistical analysis
The results are presented as the mean ± standard deviation of three or more independent experiments. Statistical significance was evaluated using Student’s t-test. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Data availability
All sequences determined in the RNA-seq analysis of BY4741 wild-type and cdc55Δ cells were deposited in the NCBI GEO repository under accession number GSE220072.
References
Alba-Lois, L. & Segal-Kischinevzky, C. Beer & wine makers. Nat. Educ. 3, 17 (2010).
Liberti, M. V. & Locasale, J. W. The Warburg effect: how does it benefit cancer cells? Trends Biochem. Sci. 41, 211–218 (2016).
Dashko, S., Zhou, N., Compagno, C. & Piškur, J. Why, when, and how did yeast evolve alcoholic fermentation? FEMS Yeast Res. 14, 826–832 (2014).
Watanabe, D. et al. Nutrient signaling via the TORC1-Greatwall-PP2AB55δ pathway is responsible for the high initial rates of alcoholic fermentation in sake yeast strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 85, e02083–18 (2019).
Okar, D. A. et al. PFK-2/FBPase-2: maker and breaker of the essential biofactor fructose-2,6-bisphosphate. Trends Biochem. Sci. 26, 30–35 (2001).
Amin, P. et al. PP2A-B55: substrates and regulators in the control of cellular functions. Oncogene 41, 1–14 (2022).
Boles, E., Göhlmann, H. W. & Zimmermann, F. K. Cloning of a second gene encoding 5-phosphofructo-2-kinase in yeast, and characterization of mutant strains without fructose-2,6-bisphosphate. Mol. Microbiol. 20, 65–76 (1996).
Fontana, L., Partridge, L. & Longo, V. D. Extending healthy life span–from yeast to humans. Science 328, 321–326 (2010).
Reiter, W. et al. Yeast protein phosphatase 2A-Cdc55 regulates the transcriptional response to hyperosmolarity stress by regulating Msn2 and Msn4 chromatin recruitment. Mol. Cell. Biol. 33, 1057–1072 (2013).
François, J. & Parrou, J. L. Reserve carbohydrates metabolism in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 25, 125–145 (2001).
Watanabe, D. et al. Inhibitory role of Greatwall-like protein kinase Rim15p in alcoholic fermentation via upregulating the UDP-glucose synthesis pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 82, 340–351 (2016).
Sekiya-Kawasaki, M. et al. Dissection of upstream regulatory components of the Rho1p effector, 1,3-β-glucan synthase, in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 162, 663–676 (2002).
Song, J. C. & Stevens, D. A. Caspofungin: pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, clinical uses and treatment outcomes. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 42, 813–846 (2016).
Blanco, C. A., Andrés-Iglesias, C. & Montero, O. Low-alcohol beers: flavor compounds, defects, and improvement strategies. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 56, 1379–1388 (2016).
Goold, H. D. et al. Yeast’s balancing act between ethanol and glycerol production in low‐alcohol wines. Microb. Biotechnol. 10, 264–278 (2017).
Malode, S. J. et al. Recent advances and viability in biofuel production. Energy Convers. Manag. X 10, 100070 (2021).
Keasling, J. et al. Microbial production of advanced biofuels. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 19, 701–715 (2021).
Goldstein, A. L. & McCusker, J. H. Three new dominant drug resistance cassettes for gene disruption in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 15, 1541–1553 (1999).
Sun, J., Nishiyama, T., Shimizu, K. & Kadota, K. TCC: an R package for comparing tag count data with robust normalization strategies. BMC Bioinforma. 14, 219 (2013).
Robinson, M. D., McCarthy, D. J. & Smyth, G. K. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26, 139–140 (2010).
Livak, K. J. & Schmittgen, T. D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-ΔΔCT method. Methods 25, 402–408 (2001).
Acknowledgements
We thank Prof. Ted Powers of UC Davis for providing the yeast strain expressing the Msn2p-GFP fusion protein. We thank Dr. Masataka Ohashi of the Nara Prefecture Institute of Industrial Development for kind help with the sake fermentation tests. We thank the Bioengineering Lab. Co., Ltd., for RNA-seq analysis. We thank Tokai Electron Microscopy, Inc. for the TEM analysis. This work was supported by grants from JSPS KAKENHI (Grant Nos. 16K18676 to D.W. and 19H05639 to H.T.) and from Masuyakinen Basic Research Foundation (to D.W.).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
D.W. conceived the project; D.W. designed the experiments; M.K. constructed GM yeast strains; N.Y. and Y.S. screened the caspofungin-tolerant sake yeast strain; M.K. performed qRT-PCR analysis; D.W. performed fluorescent microscopy; M.K. and Y.S. performed fermentation tests; M.K. and N.Y. quantified cell wall 1,3-β-glucan; D.W. and Y.S. prepared samples for RNA-seq and TEM analyses; D.W., M.K., and N.Y. contributed to data analysis and figure generation; H.T. provided technical advice; D.W. and H.T. coordinated the study; all authors contributed to the writing, editing, and completion of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Watanabe, D., Kawashima, M., Yoshioka, N. et al. Rational design of alcoholic fermentation targeting extracellular carbon. npj Sci Food 7, 37 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41538-023-00215-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41538-023-00215-0