The OsSGS3-tasiRNA-OsARF3 module orchestrates abiotic-biotic stress response trade-off in rice

Gu, Xueting; Si, Fuyan; Feng, Zhengxiang; Li, Shunjie; Liang, Di; Yang, Pei; Yang, Chao; Yan, Bin; Tang, Jun; Yang, Yu; Li, Tai; Li, Lin; Zhou, Jinling; Li, Ji; Feng, Lili; Liu, Ji-Yun; Yang, Yuanzhu; Deng, Yiwen; Wu, Xu Na; Zhao, Zhigang; Wan, Jianmin; Cao, Xiaofeng; Song, Xianwei; He, Zuhua; Liu, Junzhong

doi:10.1038/s41467-023-40176-2

Download PDF

Article
Open access
Published: 24 July 2023

The OsSGS3-tasiRNA-OsARF3 module orchestrates abiotic-biotic stress response trade-off in rice

Xueting Gu ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0004-0380-4298¹^na1,
Fuyan Si²^na1,
Zhengxiang Feng³^na1,
Shunjie Li³^na1,
Di Liang¹^na1,
Pei Yang³,
Chao Yang²,
Bin Yan²,
Jun Tang¹,
Yu Yang³,
Tai Li³,
Lin Li³,
Jinling Zhou³,
Ji Li²,
Lili Feng¹,
Ji-Yun Liu¹,
Yuanzhu Yang⁴,
Yiwen Deng¹,
Xu Na Wu³,
Zhigang Zhao⁵,
Jianmin Wan⁵,
Xiaofeng Cao ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-9871-0753^2,6,7,
Xianwei Song ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0003-6331-4189²,
Zuhua He ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-6098-7893¹ &
…
Junzhong Liu ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-7751-6775³

Nature Communications volume 14, Article number: 4441 (2023) Cite this article

7073 Accesses
11 Citations
11 Altmetric
Metrics details

Subjects

Abstract

Recurrent heat stress and pathogen invasion seriously threaten crop production, and abiotic stress often antagonizes biotic stress response against pathogens. However, the molecular mechanisms of trade-offs between thermotolerance and defense remain obscure. Here, we identify a rice thermo-sensitive mutant that displays a defect in floret development under high temperature with a mutation in SUPPRESSOR OF GENE SILENCING 3a (OsSGS3a). OsSGS3a interacts with its homolog OsSGS3b and modulates the biogenesis of trans-acting small interfering RNA (tasiRNA) targeting AUXIN RESPONSE FACTORS (ARFs). We find that OsSGS3a/b positively, while OsARF3a/b and OsARF3la/lb negatively modulate thermotolerance. Moreover, OsSGS3a negatively, while OsARF3a/b and OsARF3la/lb positively regulate disease resistance to the bacterial pathogen Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae (Xoo) and the fungal pathogen Magnaporthe oryzae (M. oryzae). Taken together, our study uncovers a previously unknown trade-off mechanism that regulates distinct immunity and thermotolerance through the OsSGS3-tasiRNA-OsARF3 module, highlighting the regulation of abiotic-biotic stress response trade-off in plants.

Introduction

Frequent heat waves are one of major abiotic stresses associated with climate change, which not only directly affects plant growth and development but also often compromises its immunity against pathogen^1,2,3,4,5. For the modern agriculture, breeding crops with multiple biotic and abiotic resistance/tolerance is the most efficient approach to safeguard food production in the ever-changing climate. Basically, plants must adjust their prioritization towards defense or stress tolerance to survive in adverse environments. In most cases, exposure of plants to abiotic stresses, such as heat, cold, drought, and salinity, often has a negative effect on defense responses⁶. Heat stress not only suppresses immune responses including cytosolic Ca²⁺ influx and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production^7,8,9, but also suppresses effector-triggered immunity (ETI) through modulating the activity of nucleotide-binding, leucine-rich repeat (NLR) immune receptors¹⁰.

Plant growth-defense trade-offs are often regulated by plant hormones and transcription factors¹¹. However, our knowledge regarding how plants coordinate biotic and abiotic stress responses remains rather limited^6,12. It was reported that heat inhibits the production and key signaling modules of salicylic acid (SA), a central plant defense hormone^3,4,13. In pepper (Capsicum annuum), the NAC-type transcription factor NAC DOMAIN CONTAINING PROTEIN 2c (CaNAC2c) coordinately regulates immunity and thermotolerance through its differential subcellular localization and interacting proteins¹⁴. A chromatin remodeling modulator CaSWC4 modulates the immunity-thermotolerance trade-off by recruiting transcription factors CabZIP63 and CaWRKY40¹⁵. AVRPPHB SUSCEPTIBLE 3 (PBS3), an acyl-adenylate/thioester-forming enzyme, balances plant immunity, salt stress responses and phyllosphere bacterial communities to maintain plant fitness through abscisic acid (ABA)-SA crosstalk under combined biotic and abiotic stresses¹⁶. The transcription factor XYLEM NAC DOMAIN 1 (XND1) in Arabidopsis, and SlERF84 and SR/CAMTA transcription factors SlSR1/3L/1L in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum, Sl) modulate the trade-off between abiotic and biotic stress responses^17,18,19. Interestingly, the immune receptor, NLR locus NLR4/ACQUIRED OSMOTOLERANCE (ACQOS), negatively modulates plant abiotic stress responses²⁰, while some immune signaling components, such as MITOGEN-ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASE 5 (OsMAPK5) and ACTIVATED DISEASE RESISTANCE 1 (ADR1) enhance abiotic stress tolerance^21,22. These studies reveal the complicated intersections between biotic and abiotic stress responses. However, how heat affects plant–biotic interaction in crops remains largely unclear.

Small RNAs are a class of noncoding RNAs that function as key guide molecules to regulate gene expression and maintain genome stability in almost all biological processes in plants^23,24,25. Phased small-interfering RNAs (phasiRNAs) are a specific type of secondary siRNAs that are generated from phasiRNA-generating (PHAS) precursor transcripts in a phased manner with an interval of 21- or 24-nucleotides (nt)²⁶. Some phasiRNAs such as trans-acting small-interfering RNAs (tasiRNAs) function in modulating the expression of target mRNAs or noncoding transcripts^26,27,28. In Arabidopsis, TAS transcripts are targeted and cleaved by miR173-Argonaute 1 (AGO1)-containing RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) or miR390-AGO7-containing RISC^28,29. RNA-DEPENDENT RNA POLYMERASE 6 (RDR6) is recruited to the cleaved fragments with the aid of a putative RNA export protein SILENCING DEFECTIVE 5 (SDE5) and a dsRNA-binding protein SUPPRESSOR OF GENE SILENCING 3 (SGS3)^30,31. The cleaved fragments are converted into double-stranded RNAs (dsRNAs) by RDR6 and then processed by Dicer-like (DCL) proteins into tasiRNAs, which modulate the expression of corresponding targets such as MYBs, HEAT-INDUCED TAS1 TARGETS (HTTs), and AUXIN RESPONSE FACTORS (ARFs)^28,29,32. Some phasiRNAs have been predicted to target large or conserved gene families, such as NLR disease resistance genes, which may fine-tune plant immune system^33,34. The crucial regulatory roles of phasiRNAs in plant growth and development have been well reviewed²⁶, while our current understanding of the roles of phasiRNAs in plant abiotic and biotic stress responses as well as their trade-off remains scarce.

We previously reported that heat-induced transgenerational degradation of SGS3 protein compromised the biogenesis of tasiRNAs, leading to the release of transgene-mediated gene silencing, early flowering, and attenuated immunity in Arabidopsis^35,36. OsSGS3a also interacts with the p2 protein of Rice stripe virus (RSV)³⁷. These findings suggest that SGS3 may coordinate the trade-off between heat stress and immunity. In this study, we identify a temperature-sensitive ossgs3a-1 mutant. Deep sequencing of small RNAs reveals that OsSGS3a is required for the biogenesis of tasiRNAs. We further identify OsSGS3a-dependent tasiRNA-OsARF3s as a crucial module responsible for the trade-off between thermotolerance and immunity, which negatively regulates disease resistance to both bacterial Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae (Xoo) and fungal Magnaporthe oryzae (M. oryzae), but positively modulates thermotolerance in rice. Thus, our results reveal that the OsSGS3-tasiRNA-OsARF3 module coordinates the trade-off between abiotic and biotic stress responses.

Results

Isolation and characterization of a thermosensitive OsSGS3a mutant

To investigate the molecular mechanisms of rice stress responses, we identified a thermosensitive abnormal palea (tsp) mutant from mutant population generated by ⁶⁰Co γ-radiation mutagenesis in an elite cultivar 2537. tsp developed open-glume florets and curved grains with significantly reduced yield traits in the summer of Shanghai with high field temperature (HT) frequently occurring at rice booting stage, but produced normal florets and grains in the winter season in Hainan with normal temperature (NT) suitable for rice growth (Fig. 1a, b, Supplementary Fig. 1a, b, and Supplementary Data 1). The pollen viability was not affected in tsp under high temperature (Supplementary Fig. 1c), thus the yield reduction was mainly caused by palea defects with disordered sclerenchyma (fs) and spongy parenchymatous cells (spc) in tsp (Supplementary Fig. 1d). These results suggest that the abnormal palea polarity identity likely leads to the floret defects in the mutant.

Genetic analysis revealed that the abnormal character of tsp was controlled by a single recessive locus. Further mapping combined with whole-genome sequencing identified only one annotated candidate gene, Suppressor of Gene Silencing 3a (OsSGS3a), which encodes a rice homolog of Arabidopsis SGS3, with a single nucleotide deletion in the last exon of OsSGS3a in tsp. The single nucleotide deletion in tsp resulted in a substitution of valine (V568) to stop codon, leading to a truncated OsSGS3a protein (Fig. 1c, d and Supplementary Fig. 1e, f). The identity of OsSGS3a gene was further confirmed using genetic complementation (Fig. 1e and Supplementary Fig. 1 g, h). We therefore renamed this mutant as ossgs3a-1. Taken together, we conclude from these results that the OsSGS3a locus is responsible for the thermosensitive mutant phenotype.

OsSGS3a interacts with OsSGS3b and functions as a major player in rice growth and development

We generated OsSGS3a-Flag transgenic plants in model rice variety Nipponbare (NIP) (Supplementary Fig. 2a), and performed immunoprecipitation-mass spectrometry (IP-MS) analysis to identify potential interacting partners of OsSGS3a. Interestingly, the homolog protein OsSGS3b (LOC_Os12g09590) was identified in the IP-MS sample from OsSGS3a-Flag transgenic plants, but not in the control NIP sample (Fig. 2a and Supplementary Data 2). Like AtSGS3, OsSGS3a and OsSGS3b both contain plant-specific domains (Supplementary Fig. 2b). We confirmed the interaction of OsSGS3a with OsSGS3b in yeast two-hybrid assay and found that the CC (coiled coil) domain of OsSGS3a was essential for their interaction (Fig. 2b). Split luciferase complementation (SLC) and co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) assays further confirmed the OsSGS3a/OsSGS3b interaction in Nicotiana benthamiana and rice (Fig. 2c, d). Like AtSGS3³⁸, OsSGS3a but not OsSGS3b can form a homodimer (Fig. 2c and Supplementary Fig. 2c), suggesting that the formation of such homodimer or heterodimer may play a role in plant siRNA biosynthesis.

**Fig. 2: OsSGS3a interacts with OsSGS3b.**

OsSGS3a was highly expressed in young panicles and developing seeds, while OsSGS3b mainly in nodes and stems (Supplementary Fig. 2d). This implies that OsSGS3a and OsSGS3b may function with subtle differences. To further investigate the function of OsSGS3a and OsSGS3b in rice, we tried to create ossgs3a and ossgs3b knockout transgenic plants in NIP background. Although at least three different types of mutations in OsSGS3a could be detected in the transformed calli (Supplementary Fig. 3a), no ossgs3a knockout transgenic plants were generated, suggesting that loss-of-function of OsSGS3a was most likely lethal. By contrast, we obtained ossgs3b knockout plants carrying different mutations (Supplementary Fig. 3b), which developed normal palea but decreased yield values (Supplementary Fig. 3c–f). We further knockout OsSGS3b in ossgs3a-1 background (Supplementary Fig. 4a, b) and found that all ossgs3a-1ossgs3b plants displayed irregular phyllotaxis and thread-like leaves and seedling lethality (Supplementary Fig. 4a). Moreover, we used RNA interference (RNAi) to simultaneously reduce the expression of OsSGS3a and OsSGS3b in transgenic plants (Supplementary Fig. 4c). The ossgs3a/b knockdown plants (OsSGS3 RNAi) exhibited floret defects and sterility at high temperature (Supplementary Fig. 4d). Next, we also generated transgenic plants overexpressing OsSGS3a/b-Flag, which did not consistently change agronomic traits (Supplementary Figs. 2a and 5a–f), suggesting a feedback regulation. These results imply that OsSGS3a and OsSGS3b are partially functionally redundant with OsSGS3a acting as a major player in rice growth and development.

We next analyzed the subcellular localization of OsSGS3a and OsSGS3b and found that OsSGS3a and OsSGS3b colocalized in the cytoplasmic granules in rice protoplasts similar with siRNA bodies observed in Arabidopsis³⁹ (Supplementary Fig. 6a). Loss-of-function of OsSGS3a did not affect the localization of OsSGS3b and vice versa (Supplementary Fig. 6b).

OsSGS3a plays an important role in tasiRNA production

A role for SGS3 proteins in the biogenesis of 21-nt secondary siRNAs has been proposed^28,40, and our previous studies have shown that AtSGS3 was involved in siRNA biogenesis in Arabidopsis^35,36. We used high-throughput sequencing to examine small RNA populations in ossgs3a-1 mutant and the wild-type 2537 grown at high temperature (Supplementary Data 3). The sRNA-seq analysis revealed a similar size distribution profile in 2537 and ossgs3a-1 (Supplementary Fig. 7a, b). However, tasiRNAs derived from OsTAS3a-e^41,42 were hardly detected in the leaves and florets of ossgs3a-1 (Fig. 3a), supporting its role in tasiRNA production in rice. As tasiR-ARFs have been shown to regulate rice development^43,44, we next used small RNA gel blots to confirm the accumulation of tasiR-ARFs. Consistently, tasiR-ARFs signals were significantly reduced in ossgs3a-1 mutants but restored in complementation lines (Fig. 3b, c and Supplementary Fig. 7c, d).

**Fig. 3: OsSGS3a modulates the biogenesis of tasiR-ARF.**

Since tasiR-ARFs target OsARF3la/OsARF14 (LOC_Os05g43920), OsARF3lb (LOC_Os01g54990), OsARF3a/OsARF2 (LOC_Os01g48060), and OsARF3b/OsARF15 (LOC_Os05g48870)^42,45, we observed that the decreased tasiR-ARFs indeed de-repressed the expression of OsARF3s in ossgs3a-1 mutants (Fig. 3d). Similarly, in OsSGS3 RNAi plants, the biogenesis of tasiR-ARFs was significantly compromised along with up-regulation of OsARF3s (Fig. 3e, f and Supplementary Fig. 7e, f). The decreased accumulation of tasiR-ARFs resulted in the significant up-regulation of OsARF3s in the palea (Fig. 3g). Loss-of-function of OsSGS3b or overexpression of OsSGS3a/b-Flag did not consistently affect the abundance of tasiR-ARFs or the expression of OsARF3a/b/la/lb in leaves (Supplementary Fig. 8a–f). Taken together, these results further support OsSGS3a as a critical regulator of tasiR-ARF biogenesis in rice. Therefore, we concluded that OsSGS3, tasiRNAs, and OsARF3s form a functional module in rice. Interestingly, a similar molecular module fine-tunes the lateral root growth in Arabidopsis through the feedback regulation of miR390 accumulation by AtARF2/3/4⁴⁶. We also propose that the feedback regulatory mechanism may contribute to the unincreased accumulation of tasiR-ARFs in plants overexpressing OsSGS3a/b.

OsSGS3a/b positively regulates thermotolerance in rice

In the field, ossgs3a-1 is sensitive to high temperatures at the reproductive stage. To determine that OsSGS3a modulates thermotolerance, we heat-stressed plants in a growth chamber and observed that fewer ossgs3a-1 plants survived compared with wild-type plants when subjected to 42 °C treatment (Fig. 4a). Similarly, ossgs3b seedlings also displayed thermosensitive phenotypes (Fig. 4b), although they did not show developmental defects. We previously reported that AtSGS3 protein is subjected to heat-induced degradation in Arabidopsis³⁵. To further examine the mechanism in rice, we found that the abundance of OsSGS3a-Flag and OsSGS3b-Flag proteins gradually decreased during heat stress (Fig. 4c, d). This heat-mediated OsSGS3a degradation was also supported using an OsSGS3a antibody to detect the endogenous OsSGS3a protein level (Fig. 4e). Interestingly, overexpression of OsSGS3a or OsSGS3b improved thermotolerance and the transgenic plants displayed significantly increased survival rate (Fig. 4f, g). Therefore, we concluded that OsSGS3a and OsSGS3b play a role in plant thermotolerance.

We propose that OsSGS3-mediated thermotolerance most likely involves tasiRNAs, given that OsSGS3 RNAi plants, both OsRDR6 RNAi and OsDCL4 RNAi transgenic plants displayed decreased thermotolerance (Supplementary Fig. 9a, b). To determine the mechanism underlying OsSGS3a-mediated thermotolerance, we performed RNA sequencing and identified downregulated genes in ossgs3a-1 under heat stress (Supplementary Fig. 9c and Supplementary Data 3 and 4). Clustering and gene ontology (GO) analysis showed that these genes are enriched for ROS-related pathways, such as antioxidant and peroxidase activity (Supplementary Fig. 9d), suggesting that OsSGS3a may modulate rice thermotolerance through ROS scavenging. Consistent with the compromised expression of ROS-related genes, DAB staining revealed increased accumulation of H₂O₂ in heat-stressed ossgs3a-1 and ossgs3b mutant plants, OsSGS3 RNAi, OsRDR6 RNAi, and OsDCL4 RNAi transgenic plants, which was associated with cell damage (Supplementary Fig. 9e–g). Similar thermo-sensitivity-associated ROS accumulation and cell death were also observed in our previous report⁴⁷. Taken together, these results suggest the role of OsSGS3a/b in protecting rice cells from heat damage.

OsSGS3a negatively regulates disease resistance to bacterial and fungal pathogens

Plants often prioritize defense over growth to defend against invading pathogens, which is known as the growth-defense trade-off^11,48. We previously reported that decreased accumulation of AtSGS3 greatly compromised immunity in Arabidopsis³⁵. As the bacterial leaf blight caused by Xoo and fungal blast caused by M. oryzae are two of the most devastating diseases in rice, we tested plant resistance to the two pathogens. To our surprise, in contrast with Arabidopsis, we found that OsSGS3 RNAi plants displayed enhanced resistance to M. oryzae (Fig. 5a and Supplementary Fig. 10a), whereas ossgs3b plants showed no obvious change in blast resistance (Supplementary Fig. 10b, c). We did not observe consistently increased susceptibility in OsSGS3a-Flag or OsSGS3b-Flag plants (Supplementary Fig. 10b–e), probably due to the similar proposed feedback regulation. OsSGS3a protein level was slightly induced upon M. oryzae inoculation and slightly decreased later (Supplementary Fig. 10f). We further detected enhanced resistance to Xoo in OsSGS3 RNAi plants, and overexpression of OsSGS3a or OsSGS3b significantly increased disease severity as in comparison with wild-type plants (Fig. 5b–d). By contrast, ossgs3b plants displayed no disease changes after inoculation with Xoo (Fig. 5d), suggesting that OsSGS3a may also play a major role in rice immunity. We propose that OsSGS3-mediated immunity most likely through tasiRNAs, given that OsRDR6 RNAi and OsDCL4 RNAi transgenic plants both displayed enhanced resistance to Xoo (Supplementary Fig. 10g, h). Taken together, the results indicated that OsSGS3a plays a negative role in disease resistance in rice.

**Fig. 5: OsSGS3a negatively regulates rice resistance to *Xoo* and *M. oryzae*.**

OsARF3a/3b/la/lb coordinates disease resistance and thermotolerance in rice, probably through ROS homeostasis

To determine tasiRNAs and their downstream targets that modulate antagonistic thermotolerance and defense in rice, we used small RNA gel blotting to further confirm the heat-induced suppression of the biogenesis of tasiR-ARFs in NIP (Supplementary Fig. 11a). RNA profiling revealed that expression levels of OsARF3a and OsARF3la were up-regulated in both heat-stressed wild-type and ossgs3a-1 mutants (Supplementary Fig. 11b). These data suggested that OsARF3s may modulate plant thermotolerance.

OsARF3la, OsARF3lb, OsARF3a, and OsARF3b all displayed high expression in rice leaves, and OsARF3b and OsARF3lb were also highly expressed in young panicles and developing seeds (Supplementary Fig. 12a). OsARF3la, OsARF3lb, OsARF3a, and OsARF3b were mainly localized in the nucleus in rice protoplasts (Supplementary Fig. 12b), consistent with their predicted functions as transcription factors. To elucidate the role of OsARF3s in plant thermotolerance and immunity, we used CRISPR/Cas9 technology to generate osarf3ab and osarf3lalb knockout mutants (Supplementary Fig. 13a–d). Both osarf3ab and osarf3lalb mutants displayed enhanced thermotolerance than wild-type NIP (Fig. 6a, b). When compared with NIP, less accumulation of H₂O₂ was observed in these mutants after heat treatment (Supplementary Fig. 13e). Taken together, these results indicated that OsARF3a/b/la/lb negatively regulates thermotolerance in rice at the seedling stage.

**Fig. 6: OsARF3a/b/la/lb coordinates disease resistance and thermotolerance in rice.**

We next checked the possible roles of OsARF3s in plant immunity. We used osarf3ab and osarf3lalb homozygous mutants for disease resistance evaluation. Both osarf3ab and osarf3lalb homozygous mutants exhibited increased susceptibility to M. oryzae and Xoo (Fig. 6c, d). It has been reported that tasiR-ARFs were rapidly induced by Xoo at 2 h post infection (hpi), along with down-regulation of OsARF3a and OsARF3b, but no induction was observed at 24 hpi⁴⁹. Intriguingly, we found that the accumulation levels of tasiR-ARFs were also slightly increased in OsSGS3 RNAi plants upon M. oryzae infection (Supplementary Fig. 13f, g and Supplementary Data 5), suggesting that unknown additional regulator(s) of tasiR-ARF production may respond to pathogen infection. Taken together, these results demonstrate that OsARF3a/b/la/lb coordinates disease resistance and thermotolerance in rice.

To determine the mechanism underlying OsARF3a/b/la/lb-mediated thermotolerance, we performed RNA sequencing and identified differentially expressed genes in wild-type NIP, osarf3ab and osarf3lalb knockout mutants under heat stress (Supplementary Data 3 and 4). Among the ROS-related genes that are modulated by OsSGS3a (Supplementary Fig. 9c), we identified a ROS scavenging-related gene OsCATA encoded by LOC_Os02g02400, which accumulated to higher levels in heat-stressed osarf3ab and osarf3lalb knockout mutants in comparison with wild-type (Supplementary Fig. 14a, b). These results suggest a potential role of OsARF3a/b/la/lb in repressing the expression of OsCATA.

Similar to osarf3ab and osarf3lalb knockout mutants, heat-stressed osarf3a seedlings⁵⁰ displayed thermo-tolerant phenotypes and less accumulation of H₂O₂ (Supplementary Fig. 14c, d), suggesting that OsARF3a negatively regulates rice thermotolerance at seedling stage. ARF proteins have been reported to modulate the expression of target genes through binding the auxin-responsive elements (AuxREs: TGTCNN)^51,52 or sugar-responsive elements (SuREs: GTCTC)⁵⁰. To confirm the direct binding of OsARF3s to the promoter region of OsCATA, we obtained OsARF3a-Flag transgenic plants in osarf3a⁵⁰ and performed chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)-qPCR. The result showed that OsARF3a-Flag could directly bind to the P4 fragment in the promoter of OsCATA that contained 1 AuxRE and 2 SuREs, but not to other fragments under heat stress (Supplementary Fig. 14e). The regulatory role of OsARF3a on OsCATA expression and how OsCATA coordinates disease resistance and thermotolerance in rice will be further investigated independently.

Discussion

For stable and sustainable food production in modern agriculture that is facing changing or even deteriorative environments, breeding crops with disease resistance and abiotic stress tolerance, two major targets of the multi-resistance strategy, provides a practical solution. However, because of the antagonism between abiotic stress responses and biotic (pathogen) defense, this multi-resistance breeding strategy has been a large challenge to plant breeders. Few studies have been conducted on defense-abiotic tolerance, resulting in a lack of knowledge on the trade-offs between disease resistance and abiotic tolerance in plants. Here we show that OsSGS3-tasiRNA-OsARF3 module plays an important role in coordinating the trade-off between heat tolerance and disease resistance, which positively regulates thermotolerance, but negatively modulates immunity in rice (Fig. 7). Interestingly, the same module likely modulates contrary outputs of the abiotic-biotic stress response trade-off in Arabidopsis³⁵, suggesting that different plants (rice as a summer plant vs. Arabidopsis as a winter plant) may adopt different trade-offs of abiotic-biotic stress responses.

**Fig. 7: A proposed model for OsSGS3-tasiRNA-OsARF module-mediated abiotic-biotic stress response trade-off.**

ARFs can activate or repress the expression of their downstream targets, such as GH3 family members, which catalyze the formation of conjugated forms of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) to maintain hormonal homeostasis⁵². In Arabidopsis, GH3 member WES1-mediated auxin homeostasis fine-tunes growth, abiotic and biotic stresses adaption responses⁵³. OsARF12 positively modulates the expression of OsGH3-2, which contributes to rice basal resistance by suppressing pathogen-induced IAA accumulation^54,55,56. Whether the OsSGS3-tasiRNA-OsARF3 module also recruits these GH3 targets to modulate thermotolerance and immunity will be further investigated. Our study suggested that OsARF3a may modulate the expression of OsCATA, which functions in scavenging ROS and rice immunity⁵⁷. How OsCATA controls ROS homeostasis and coordinates disease resistance and thermotolerance remains to be studied.

The miR390-TAS3-ARF pathway is an evolutionarily conserved regulatory circuit in land plants^28,58. In rice, the expression of OsmiR390 is downregulated by various abiotic and biotic stresses, such as heavy metal stress, drought and salt stress, UV light stress, and fungal infection⁵⁹. Here, our results revealed that loss-of-function of OsARF3a/b and OsARF3la/lb lead to enhanced thermotolerance with slightly but statistically significantly reduced disease resistance, suggesting that tasiR-ARF and the OsARF3 targets may constitute an autoregulatory network to fine-tune rice immunity and thermotolerance. Notable, this fine-tuning of stress responses is mostly subtle without complete loss of disease resistance or thermotolerance, allowing plants to survive the diverse abiotic and biotic stresses.

Loss-of-function of AtSGS3 accelerates the juvenile-to-adult phase transition with elongated and epinastic leaves in Arabidopsis^40,60. The mutation of LEAFBLADELESS1 (LBL1), an ortholog of AtSGS3, leads to abaxialized radial leaves and abnormal reproductive development in maize⁶¹. Our study reveals that OsSGS3a is required for both vegetative and reproductive development in rice. SGS3 proteins most likely play important roles in abiotic and biotic stress responses through its function in the biogenesis of tasiRNAs. Interestingly, heat stress promotes AtSGS3³⁵ and OsSGS3a/b degradation, indicating that SGS3 is a key thermosensitive component. This heat-sensitive degradation of SGS3s may have a fundamentally biologically importance: redirecting resources for seed development thus ensuring environmental fitness under stress³⁵. However, the abundance of OsSGS3a protein was slightly increased upon M. oryzae infection in wild-type plants, suggesting a differential modulation of OsSGS3 protein levels under biotic and heat stress. Importantly, we have showed that OsSGS3a and OsSGS3b enhanced rice thermotolerance while the suppression of OsSGS3a/b enhanced rice disease resistance. Therefore, the OsSGS3-tasiRNA-OsARF3 module is likely differentially regulated in face of abiotic and biotic stress. Possible natural alleles or gene editing of SGS3 genes may provide valuable resources for breeding thermo-tolerant as well as disease-resistant crops.

In paddy field, rice plants are often exposed to the combination of different abiotic stresses and pathogens. OsSGS3-tasiRNA-OsARF3 module positively regulates abiotic stress response, but negatively modulates plant disease resistance. This regulatory module of multiple components may have an evolutional advantage: allowing the network to preciously respond to diverse stresses under the agricultural conditions. More studies with abiotic and biotic stress mutants will provide a comprehensive insight into the genetic interactions between the two important stress response machineries in plants. Nevertheless, our current study provides an experimental example that the trade-off between thermotolerance and plant immunity can be fine-tuned by the OsSGS3-tasiRNA-OsARF3 module in crop breeding.

Methods

Plant materials and growth conditions

The japonica/Geng variety Nipponbare (NIP) was used to generate various transgenic plants, including OsSGS3a-FLAG OE, OsSGS3b-FLAG OE, ossgs3b, OsSGS3 RNAi, OsRDR6 RNAi, OsDCL4 RNAi, osarf3ab, and osarf3lalb. The tsp/ossgs3a-1 mutant was isolated from the cultivar 2537 and used to generate OsSGS3a-Flag OE in ossgs3a-1 and ossgs3a-1ossgs3b. All rice plants were grown in the isolated experimental fields in Shanghai (East China, summer rice season), or Hainan (South China, winter rice season) under natural conditions for seed production, pathogen inoculation, and phenotypic analysis. Plants were grown in Shanghai in the summer with high field temperature (HT, ≥35 °C) frequently occurring at the rice booting stage, or in Hainan in the winter with normal temperature (NT) suitable for rice growth (Supplementary Data 1). For thermotolerance analysis of plants at the seedling stage, 12-day-old seedlings were treated at 42 °C in growth chambers for the indicated periods shown in Figs. 4a, b, f, g, 6a, b, Supplementary Figs. 9b and 14c. Seed-setting rate, 1000-grain weight, and full-filled grain yield per plant were quantified during field trials. Nicotiana benthamiana for transient expression was grown at 22 °C with a 16 h/8 h photoperiod.

Histochemical analyses

The accumulation of hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) was detected by 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB) staining as described previously⁶². Heat-stressed rice leaves were collected and vacuum-infiltrated in DAB solution [1 mg/mL DAB, 10 mM MES, pH 3.8, 0.2% (v/v) Tween-20] for 5 min and incubated at 25 °C for 8 h in the light. Samples were then cleared by boiling in 96% ethanol for 10 min before photography. Semi-thin sectioning experiments were performed as previously described⁴⁵. In brief, samples were fixed in FAA (50% ethanol, 5% glacial acetic acid, and 5% formaldehyde) at 4 °C overnight and then dehydrated in an ethanol series. Samples were then embedded in Technovit-7100 for sectioning. The 4 μm thick sections were cut with a microtome (HM340E), stained with toluidine blue, and observed under a microspore.

Map-based cloning

Mapping populations were generated by crossing tsp mutants with IRTA129. Using defective glume plants identified in the F₂ segregating population, the locus was first mapped to chromosome 12 within a 2.41 M interval. Further, the tsp was backcrossed to 2537 for whole-genome sequencing using the Illumina NovaSeq6000 platform, which was performed by Berry Genomics. The SNP index for mutant at segregating bi-allelic SNPs in 100-kb sliding windows (by 10 kb) was summed for the various sequencing pools, and allele frequencies were calculated. Finally, the difference in allele frequency (SNP index) between the mutant pool and wild-type pool was calculated for all pairwise comparisons and plotted across the 12 chromosomes.

Constructs and rice transformation

For the construction of OsSGS3a or OsSGS3b overexpression plasmid, full-length coding sequence of OsSGS3a or OsSGS3b was amplified from genomic DNA, fused with Flag tag or not, and cloned into binary vector PUN1301 under the control of the ubiquitin promoter (Ubi) of Zea mays. To construct the OsSGS3, OsRDR6, and OsDCL4 knockdown plasmid, 300-bp cDNA fragments of OsSGS3, OsRDR6, and OsDCL4 were amplified, respectively, and inserted into the binary vector pTCK303 in both the sense and antisense orientations. Driven by ubiquitin promoter, RNAs were transcribed from the pTCK303-OsSGS3, pTCK303-OsRDR6, and pTCK303-OsDCL4 vectors, were then cleaved by Dicer proteins to generate siRNAs to guide the gene silencing of endogenous OsSGS3, OsRDR6, and OsDCL4 transcripts, respectively. For CRISPR/Cas9 constructs, the designed sgRNAs of OsSGS3a, OsSGS3b, OsARF3a, OsARF3b, OsARF3la, and OsARF3lb were synthesized and fused into the pYLCRISPR vector following the protocol⁶³. All the constructs were introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain EHA105 to transform NIP calli via Agrobacterium-mediated transformation, leading to the generation of more than 30 independent lines for each transgene. PCR-based sequencing was performed to identify target gene mutations and homozygous mutants were used for experiments. All primer sequences used for cloning can be found in Supplementary Data 6.

Pathogen inoculation and disease resistance assay

Xoo and blast inoculation were performed as previously described^57,62. For the Xoo resistance assay, 2-month-old rice seedlings grown in the field were inoculated with Philippine strain P6 (PXO99A) suspended in sterilized water at a concentration of OD₆₀₀ = 1.0 by leaf-clipping method⁶⁴. Upon Xoo infection, lesions usually develop as water-soaked to yellow-orange stripes on mechanically injured parts of leaves, and progress toward the leaf base. Lesion lengths were measured from more than 30 leaves for each genotype and recorded at 14 dpi (days post inoculation). M. oryzae isolate TH12 was used for rice blast inoculation. For seedling spraying inoculation with M. oryzae spores (1 × 10⁵ spores/mL in sterile water containing 0.05% Tween-20), two-week-old seedlings were grown in a dew growth chamber at 26 °C with a 14 h/10 h (day/night) photoperiod. For punch inoculation, leaves of 4-week-old rice seedlings grown in the field were punch inoculated with spore suspensions (1 × 10⁵ spores/mL in sterile water containing 0.05% Tween-20). At 5–7 dpi, lesion lengths of fifteen infected leaves were measured. Blast lesions are spindle-shaped with necrotic borders. The relative fungal growth was calculated by DNA-based quantitative PCR (qPCR) using the threshold cycle value (C_T) of M. oryzae Pot2 DNA against the C_T of rice genomic UBIQUITIN DNA. All experiments were independently repeated at least two times.

RNA analysis

Total RNAs were extracted using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) from rice leaves or florets. To prevent loss of small RNAs with low GC content, MgCl₂ was added at a final concentration of 0.2 M⁶⁵. RNA was quantified using NanoDrop, and ~1 μg total RNA was converted into cDNA using HiScript Q RT SuperMix with gDNA remover (Vazyme, R123-01). cDNAs were amplified for quantitative analysis using SYBR Premix Ex Taq (Takara, RR420A) following the manufacturer’s instructions using a CFX96 Touch Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad). OsActin served as an internal control to normalize the expression of individual genes. The primers used for qRT-PCR are listed in Supplementary Data 6.

To analyze small RNAs, 20–30 μg total RNA were separated by electrophoresis on 15% polyacrylamide/7 M urea gels, transferred to nylon membrane (GE Health), and subjected to UV irradiation-mediated cross-linking. Biotin-labeled probes complementary to specific siRNA were synthesized and hybridized with the membrane. The signals of immobilized nucleic acids were detected by Nucleic Acid Detection Module Kit (Thermo Fisher, 89880). After stripping the probes, OsU6 probe was used to re-probe the same membrane as a loading control. Uncropped versions of all gels or blots are shown in the Source Data files. qRT-PCR analysis of tasiR-ARF was conducted as previously described⁴³. OsU6 served as an internal control to normalize the expression of tasiR-ARF. The primers are listed in Supplementary Data 6.

Protoplast transient expression assay

The fusion protein expression plasmids pA7-OsSGS3a-eGFP, pA7-GFP-OsSGS3a, pA7-OsSGS3b-eGFP, pA7-GFP-OsSGS3b, pA7-OsSGS3a-mCherry, pA7-OsSGS3b-mCherry, pA7-OsARF3a-eGFP, pA7-OsARF3b-eGFP, pA7-OsARF3la-eGFP, and pA7-OsARF3lb-eGFP were constructed and purified with HiSpeed Plasmid Midi Kit (QIAGEN, 12643). The NLS sequence was fused with RFP into PA7-35S-RFP as a nuclear marker. CFP driven by the 35 S promoter was used as a non-specific localized protein control. The isolation of rice protoplasts from seedling sheaths and PEG-mediated transformation were performed as described previously⁶⁶. Fluorescence signals were detected using a confocal microscope (Olympus Fluoview FV1000 and Leica TSC SP8 STED 3X).

Protein analysis

HIS-OsSGS3a-N (amino acids 1–184) was used as an antigen to produce anti-OsSGS3a polyclonal antibodies by ABclonal® Technology (Wuhan, China). To extract total proteins from plants, 0.2 g fresh leaves were ground into fine power in liquid nitrogen and homogenized in the protein extraction buffer (150 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 6 M urea, 2% SDS, and 5% β-mercaptoethanol). Extracts were boiled for 5 min and then centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C to remove debris. Supernatants were collected and mixed with SDS loading buffer for protein gel blot analysis.

The co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) was performed as described previously⁶⁶. Protein extracts from rice leaves were prepared in the IP lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol, 1% Triton X-100, 1 mM PMSF, and 1× protease inhibitor cocktail). Different combinations of supernatants were incubated with pre-washed Anti-FLAG® M2 Magnetic Beads (Sigma, M8823) at 4 °C for 2 h and washed four times with lysis buffer. The bound proteins were eluted from the affinity beads by boiling for 5 min in 40 μl 2× SDS loading buffer and analyzed by immunoblotting. Antibodies, including anti-GFP (Abcam, ab290, 1:2000), anti-FLAG (Sigma, F1804, 1:2000), anti-OsSGS3a (custom-developed by ABclonal® Technology, China, 1:1000), anti-ACTIN (CMCTAG, AT0004, 1:2000), Goat Anti-Rabbit IgG HRP (Thermo, 31460, 1:10,000), Goat Anti-Mouse IgG HRP (BIO-RAD, 170-6516, 1:10,000), were used. Co-IP and western blot experiments were independently repeated at least two times. Uncropped versions of all gels or blots are shown in the Source Data files.

LC-MS/MS analysis

To identify OsSGS3a-interacting proteins, total proteins were extracted from the leaves of 2-week-old seedlings of OsSGS3a-FLAG OE with the IP lysis buffer mentioned above. Protein extracted from NIP seedlings was used as a negative control. The OsSGS3a-FLAG proteins were enriched by immunoprecipitation using Anti-FLAG® M2 Magnetic Beads, washed four times with IP lysis buffer, eluted with 0.1 M glycine (pH = 2.5). The supernatant was collected and separated by SDS-PAGE, and protein bands were digested into peptides by trypsin and recovered. Peptides mixtures were analyzed by Easy-nLC 1200 (Thermo Scientific) and mass spectrometer (Orbitrap Exploris 480, Thermo Scientific). The data were analyzed with MaxQuant software (1.6.17.0) for protein identification and quantification, using the Rice Annotation Project (RAP) database (http://rapdb.dna.affrc.go.jp/). The results of LC-MS/MS analysis are provided in Supplementary Data 2.

Yeast two-hybrid assay

The coding sequences of OsSGS3a and OsSGS3b as well as different versions of truncated OsSGS3a proteins were cloned into pDEST22 (AD) or pDEST32 (BD) vectors. The desired combinations of bait and prey constructs were co-transformed into yeast strain AH109. Clones were incubated on selective mediums lacking Trp, Leu, Ade and His. Images were taken 3 days after incubation.

SLC experiments

For SLC, OsSGS3a, OsSGS3aΔCC, and OsSGS3b were fused to the N- or C-terminus of firefly luciferase and transformed to Agrobacterium strain GV3101. Overnight cultures of Agrobacteria were collected by centrifugation and resuspended in MES buffer (10 mM MgCl₂,10 mM MES, 150 μM acetosyringone, pH 5.6). The desired combinations of clones were mixed with GV3101 expressing P19 at a final OD₆₀₀ of 0.5 and incubated at 28–30 °C for 2–3 h before infiltration. Leaves of 4-week-old N. benthamiana were syringe-infiltrated with the suspensions. After 2 days, the LUC activity was measured with Luciferase Assay Systems (Promega), and images were captured using the Tanon-5200 Chemiluminescent imaging system (Tanon). For luciferase activity measurement, infiltrated leaves were collected and ground into fine powder in liquid nitrogen, and homogenized in lysis buffer following the manufacturer’s instructions (Promega). The supernatant was then incubated with luciferin substrate in a 96-well plate for 10–15 min, and luminescence was measured with the Varioskan Flash (Thermo Fisher Scientific) plate reader. All primers used are listed in Supplementary Data 6.

mRNA sequencing and data analysis

Libraries for mRNA-seq were constructed and sequenced by Annoroad Gene Technology (Beijing). Briefly, RNAs were quantified by NanoDrop 2000c UV-Vis Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific), agarose gel electrophoresis, and Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent technologies). mRNAs were isolated from total RNAs by poly(A) selection, fragmented into short fragments, and converted to cDNAs. cDNAs were ligated to adapters and the suitable fragments were selected for PCR amplification as templates. All the RNA-seq libraries were pair-end sequenced on an MGI DNBSEQ T7 platform.

mRNA sequencing data analysis were performed as reported⁶⁵. Low-quality reads were removed, and adapters were trimmed to obtain clean reads, which were mapped to the reference genome (MSU v7). The expression level of each gene was calculated as the FPKM value (fragments per kilobase of transcript per million mapped reads). For differential gene expression analysis, we used a ≥1.5-fold change and a false discovery rate (FDR) ≤0.05 as cutoffs.

Small RNA sequencing and data analysis

Small RNA libraries construction and data analysis were performed as reported⁶⁵. Total RNAs enriched for small RNA were extracted from heat-stressed or normal leaves and young florets of ossgs3a-1 mutant plants and the wild-type controls. Total RNAs were ligated to pre-adenylated 3′ adaptors by T4 RNA ligase 2, truncated KQ (NEB, M0373L), and then ligated to 5′ RNA adaptors using T4 RNA ligase 1 (NEB, M0204L). These RNAs were reverse transcribed and amplified using GXL DNA polymerase (Takara, R050A). PCR products between 135 and 160 bp in length were collected by gel separation and pair-end sequenced on an Illumina HiSeqX-Ten platform by Annoroad Gene Technology (Beijing).

For small RNA-sequencing data analysis, low-quality reads were filtered and 3′ adapter sequences were trimmed. Clean small RNA reads between 18 to 30 nt in length were mapped to the rice reference genome (MSU v7) using the program Bowtie, allowing no mismatches. Small RNA reads that mapped to the rRNAs, tRNAs, snRNAs, and snoRNAs were filtered.

ChIP-qPCR analysis

ChIP experiments were performed as described⁶⁷. Briefly, 1 g two-week-old seedling leaves of OsARF3a-Flag/osarf3a⁵⁰ and ZH11 (Negative control) were harvested after heat treatment at 42 °C for 6 h and cross-linked with 1% formaldehyde. After quenching the cross-linking by adding glycine, the leaves were ground into fine powder in liquid nitrogen. Chromatin was isolated and sheared into 200 to 500-bp fragments by sonication. The sonicated chromatin was incubated with antibodies against Flag (Sigma, F1804) overnight at 4 °C. Immunocomplexes were precipitated, washed, eluted, and the cross-linking was reversed overnight at 65 °C. Precipitated DNA fragments were then recovered with the GlycoBlue™ Coprecipitant (Thermo, AM9516) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. ChIP-qPCR was performed with three replicates, and relative fold enrichments were indicated by the percentage of input DNA. ChIP experiments were performed independently twice with similar results. Sequences of the primers used for ChIP-qPCR are listed in Supplementary Data 6.

Statistical analysis

For qRT-PCR analyses, thermotolerance assays, agronomic traits assessment, and disease assays, significant differences between samples/lines and the corresponding controls were analyzed using two-tailed Student’s t test for pairwise comparisons, one-way or two-way ANOVA analysis with Tukey’s multiple comparison test as specified in the Figure legends. Samples sharing lowercase letters are not significantly different. Detailed information about statistical analysis values for all ANOVA analyses is provided in Supplementary Data 7.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

All data are available within this article and its Supplementary Information. The mRNA and small RNA-sequencing datasets generated in this study have been deposited in the Genome Sequence Archive in National Genomics Data Center (NGDC) under project CRA008524 (https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/gsa/browse/CRA008524). The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE⁶⁸ partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD043706. A reporting summary for this article is available as a Supplementary Information file. Original data points in graphs and uncropped versions of all gels or blots are shown in the Source Data files. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

Cohen, S. P. & Leach, J. E. High temperature-induced plant disease susceptibility: more than the sum of its parts. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 56, 235–241 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Desaint, H. et al. Fight hard or die trying: when plants face pathogens under heat stress. New Phytol. 229, 712–734 (2021).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Kim, J. H. et al. Increasing the resilience of plant immunity to a warming climate. Nature 607, 339–344 (2022).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kim, J. H., Hilleary, R., Seroka, A. & He, S. Y. Crops of the future: building a climate-resilient plant immune system. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 60, 101997 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Cheng, Y. T., Zhang, L. & He, S. Y. Plant-microbe interactions facing environmental challenge. Cell Host Microbe 26, 183–192 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Suzuki, N. et al. Abiotic and biotic stress combinations. New Phytol. 203, 32–43 (2014).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Cheng, C. et al. Plant immune response to pathogens differs with changing temperatures. Nat. Commun. 4, 2530 (2013).
Article ADS PubMed Google Scholar
Hilleary, R. et al. Tonoplast-localized Ca²⁺ pumps regulate Ca²⁺ signals during pattern-triggered immunity in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 117, 18849–18857 (2020).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Janda, M. et al. Temporary heat stress suppresses PAMP-triggered immunity and resistance to bacteria in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Plant Pathol. 20, 1005–1012 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhu, Y., Qian, W. & Hua, J. Temperature modulates plant defense responses through NB-LRR proteins. PLoS Pathog. 6, e1000844 (2010).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
He, Z., Webster, S. & He, S. Y. Growth-defense trade-offs in plants. Curr. Biol. 32, R634–R639 (2022).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Saijo, Y. & Loo, E. P. Plant immunity in signal integration between biotic and abiotic stress responses. New Phytol. 225, 87–104 (2020).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Huot, B. et al. Dual impact of elevated temperature on plant defence and bacterial virulence in Arabidopsis. Nat. Commun. 8, 1808 (2017).
Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Cai, W. et al. Pepper NAC-type transcription factor NAC2c balances the trade-off between growth and defense responses. Plant Physiol. 186, 2169–2189 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Cai, W. et al. CaSWC4 regulates the immunity-thermotolerance tradeoff by recruiting CabZIP63/CaWRKY40 to target genes and activating chromatin in pepper. PLoS Genet. 18, e1010023 (2022).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Berens, M. L. et al. Balancing trade-offs between biotic and abiotic stress responses through leaf age-dependent variation in stress hormone cross-talk. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 116, 2364–2373 (2019).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Tang, N. et al. Natural variation at XND1 impacts root hydraulics and trade-off for stress responses in Arabidopsis. Nat. Commun. 9, 3884 (2018).
Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Li, Z. et al. A tomato ERF transcription factor, SlERF84, confers enhanced tolerance to drought and salt stress but negatively regulates immunity against Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 132, 683–695 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Li, X. et al. Tomato SR/CAMTA transcription factors SlSR1 and SlSR3L negatively regulate disease resistance response and SlSR1L positively modulates drought stress tolerance. BMC Plant Biol. 14, 286 (2014).
Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ariga, H. et al. NLR locus-mediated trade-off between abiotic and biotic stress adaptation in Arabidopsis. Nat. Plants 3, 17072 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Chini, A. et al. Drought tolerance established by enhanced expression of the CC-NBS-LRR gene, ADR1, requires salicylic acid, EDS1 and ABI1. Plant J. 38, 810–822 (2004).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Xiong, L. & Yang, Y. Disease resistance and abiotic stress tolerance in rice are inversely modulated by an abscisic acid-inducible mitogen-activated protein kinase. Plant Cell 15, 745–759 (2003).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Song, X., Li, Y., Cao, X. & Qi, Y. MicroRNAs and their regulatory roles in plant–environment interactions. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 70, 489–525 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Borges, F. & Martienssen, R. A. The expanding world of small RNAs in plants. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 16, 727–741 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Yu, Y., Zhang, Y., Chen, X. & Chen, Y. Plant noncoding RNAs: hidden players in development and stress responses. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 35, 407–431 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Liu, Y., Teng, C., Xia, R. & Meyers, B. C. PhasiRNAs in plants: their biogenesis, genic sources, and roles in stress responses, development, and reproduction. Plant Cell 32, 3059–3080 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Montgomery, T. A. et al. Specificity of ARGONAUTE7-miR390 interaction and dual functionality in TAS3 trans-acting siRNA formation. Cell 133, 128–141 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Allen, E., Xie, Z., Gustafson, A. M. & Carrington, J. C. microRNA-directed phasing during trans-acting siRNA biogenesis in plants. Cell 121, 207–221 (2005).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Axtell, M. J., Jan, C., Rajagopalan, R. & Bartel, D. P. A two-hit trigger for siRNA biogenesis in plants. Cell 127, 565–577 (2006).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Yoshikawa, M. et al. Cooperative recruitment of RDR6 by SGS3 and SDE5 during small interfering RNA amplification in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2102885118 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sakurai, Y. et al. Cell-free reconstitution reveals the molecular mechanisms for the initiation of secondary siRNA biogenesis in plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 118, e2102889118 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Li, S. et al. HEAT-INDUCED TAS1 TARGET1 mediates thermotolerance via HEAT STRESS TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR A1a-directed pathways in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 26, 1764–1780 (2014).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Fei, Q., Zhang, Y., Xia, R. & Meyers, B. C. Small RNAs add zing to the zig-zag-zig model of plant defenses. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact 29, 165–169 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Fei, Q., Xia, R. & Meyers, B. C. Phased, secondary, small interfering RNAs in posttranscriptional regulatory networks. Plant Cell 25, 2400–2415 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Liu, J. et al. An H3K27me3 demethylase-HSFA2 regulatory loop orchestrates transgenerational thermomemory in Arabidopsis. Cell Res. 29, 379–390 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhong, S. H. et al. Warm temperatures induce transgenerational epigenetic release of RNA silencing by inhibiting siRNA biogenesis in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 9171–9176 (2013).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Du, Z. et al. p2 of rice stripe virus (RSV) interacts with OsSGS3 and is a silencing suppressor. Mol. Plant Pathol. 12, 808–814 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Elmayan, T. et al. A neomorphic sgs3 allele stabilizing miRNA cleavage products reveals that SGS3 acts as a homodimer. FEBS J. 276, 835–844 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kim, E. Y. et al. Ribosome stalling and SGS3 phase separation prime the epigenetic silencing of transposons. Nat. Plants 7, 303–309 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Peragine, A. et al. SGS3 and SGS2/SDE1/RDR6 are required for juvenile development and the production of trans-acting siRNAs in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev. 18, 2368–2379 (2004).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhu, Q. H. et al. A diverse set of microRNAs and microRNA-like small RNAs in developing rice grains. Genome Res. 18, 1456–1465 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Luo, L. et al. TRANS-ACTING SIRNA3-derived short interfering RNAs confer cleavage of mRNAs in rice. Plant Physiol. 188, 347–362 (2022).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Si, F. et al. Control of OsARF3a by OsKANADI1 contributes to lemma development in rice. Plant J. 110, 1717–1730 (2022).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Song, X. et al. Rice RNA-dependent RNA polymerase 6 acts in small RNA biogenesis and spikelet development. Plant J. 71, 378–389 (2012).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Liu, B. et al. Oryza sativa dicer-like4 reveals a key role for small interfering RNA silencing in plant development. Plant Cell 19, 2705–2718 (2007).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Marin, E. et al. miR390, Arabidopsis TAS3 tasiRNAs, and their AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR targets define an autoregulatory network quantitatively regulating lateral root growth. Plant Cell 22, 1104–1117 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Shen, H. et al. Overexpression of receptor-like kinase ERECTA improves thermotolerance in rice and tomato. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 996–1003 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Yang, D. L. et al. Plant hormone jasmonate prioritizes defense over growth by interfering with gibberellin signaling cascade. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 109, E1192–E1200 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhao, Y. T. et al. Dynamic and coordinated expression changes of rice small RNAs in response to Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae. J. Genet. Genomics 42, 625–637 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zhao, Z. et al. Auxin regulates source-sink carbohydrate partitioning and reproductive organ development in rice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 119, e2121671119 (2022).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Cancé, C., Martin-Arevalillo, R., Boubekeur, K. & Dumas, R. Auxin response factors are keys to the many auxin doors. New Phytol. 235, 402–419 (2022).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Guilfoyle, T. J. & Hagen, G. Auxin response factors. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 10, 453–460 (2007).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Park, J. E. et al. GH3-mediated auxin homeostasis links growth regulation with stress adaptation response in Arabidopsis. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 10036–10046 (2007).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Fu, J. et al. Manipulating broad-spectrum disease resistance by suppressing pathogen-induced auxin accumulation in rice. Plant Physiol. 155, 589–602 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zhao, Z. X. et al. Osa-miR167d facilitates infection of Magnaporthe oryzae in rice. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 62, 702–715 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Yang, J. H., Han, S. J., Yoon, E. K. & Lee, W. S. Evidence of an auxin signal pathway, microRNA167-ARF8-GH3, and its response to exogenous auxin in cultured rice cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, 1892–1899 (2006).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Gao, M. et al. Ca²⁺ sensor-mediated ROS scavenging suppresses rice immunity and is exploited by a fungal effector. Cell 184, 5391–5404.e17 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Xia, R., Xu, J. & Meyers, B. C. The emergence, evolution, and diversification of the miR390-TAS3-ARF pathway in land plants. Plant Cell 29, 1232–1247 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lu, Y. et al. MiR393 and miR390 synergistically regulate lateral root growth in rice under different conditions. BMC Plant Biol. 18, 261 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Yoshikawa, M., Peragine, A., Park, M. Y. & Poethig, R. S. A pathway for the biogenesis of trans-acting siRNAs in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev. 19, 2164–2175 (2005).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Nogueira, F. T. et al. Two small regulatory RNAs establish opposing fates of a developmental axis. Genes Dev. 21, 750–755 (2007).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Yin, X. et al. Rice copine genes OsBON1 and OsBON3 function as suppressors of broad-spectrum disease resistance. Plant Biotechnol. J. 16, 1476–1487 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ma, X. et al. A robust CRISPR/Cas9 system for convenient, high-efficiency multiplex genome editing in monocot and dicot plants. Mol. Plant 8, 1274–1284 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Chen, F. et al. Genome sequencing of the bacterial blight pathogen DY89031 reveals its diverse virulence and origins of Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae strains. Sci. China Life Sci. 64, 2175–2185 (2021).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Jiang, P. et al. 21-nt phasiRNAs direct target mRNA cleavage in rice male germ cells. Nat. Commun. 11, 5191 (2020).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhai, K. et al. NLRs guard metabolism to coordinate pattern- and effector-triggered immunity. Nature 601, 245–251 (2022).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zhai, K. et al. RRM transcription factors interact with NLRs and regulate broad-spectrum blast resistance in rice. Mol. Cell 74, 996–1009.e7 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Perez-Riverol, Y. et al. The PRIDE database resources in 2022: a hub for mass spectrometry-based proteomics evidences. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, D543–D552 (2022).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Professor Yijun Qi (Tsinghua University) and Pengfei Jiang (Anhui Agricultural University) for kindly providing protocols for constructing small RNA libraries. We also thank Professor Xiang Yu (Shanghai Jiao Tong University) for assistance in analyzing the data of small RNA sequencing. We thank Dr. Leonard Krall for critical reading and comments. We thank the proteomics facility of Life Sciences School in Yunnan University for LC-MS/MS analysis. This work was supported by funding from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (91940301 and 32088102 to Z.H., 32070564 and 31600207 to J.Z.L., 32170620 to X.S.), the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB27040201 to Z.H., XDA24010302 to X.S.), and Yunnan Fundamental Research Projects (202101AW070002 and 202201AT070090 to J.Z.L.).

Author information

These authors contributed equally: Xueting Gu, Fuyan Si, Zhengxiang Feng, Shunjie Li, Di Liang.

Authors and Affiliations

National Key Laboratory of Plant Molecular Genetics, CAS Center for Excellence in Molecular Plant Sciences, Institute of Plant Physiology and Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 200032, Shanghai, China
Xueting Gu, Di Liang, Jun Tang, Lili Feng, Ji-Yun Liu, Yiwen Deng & Zuhua He
State Key Laboratory of Plant Genomics and National Center for Plant Gene Research, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100101, Beijing, China
Fuyan Si, Chao Yang, Bin Yan, Ji Li, Xiaofeng Cao & Xianwei Song
Center for Life Sciences, School of Life Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Conservation and Utilization of Bio-Resources in Yunnan, Yunnan University, 650500, Kunming, China
Zhengxiang Feng, Shunjie Li, Pei Yang, Yu Yang, Tai Li, Lin Li, Jinling Zhou, Xu Na Wu & Junzhong Liu
Department of Rice Breeding, Hunan Yahua Seed Scientific Research Institute, 410119, Changsha, Hunan, China
Yuanzhu Yang
National Key Laboratory for Crop Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement, Nanjing Agricultural University, 210095, Nanjing, China
Zhigang Zhao & Jianmin Wan
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100039, Beijing, China
Xiaofeng Cao
CAS Center for Excellence in Molecular Plant Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100101, Beijing, China
Xiaofeng Cao

Authors

Xueting Gu
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Fuyan Si
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Zhengxiang Feng
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Shunjie Li
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Di Liang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Pei Yang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Chao Yang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Bin Yan
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Jun Tang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Yu Yang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Tai Li
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Lin Li
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Jinling Zhou
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Ji Li
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Lili Feng
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Ji-Yun Liu
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Yuanzhu Yang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Yiwen Deng
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Xu Na Wu
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Zhigang Zhao
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Jianmin Wan
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Xiaofeng Cao
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Xianwei Song
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Zuhua He
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Junzhong Liu
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

X.G., F.S., X.S., Z.H., and J.Z.L. conceived and designed the experiments; X.G., F.S., and S.L. performed most of the experiments, including thermotolerance assay, histochemical analyses, construction of plasmids and rice transformation, pathogen inoculation and disease resistance assay, RNA analysis, protoplast transient expression assay, protein analysis, yeast two-hybrid assay and SLC assay; Z.F., C.Y., and Y.Y. performed small RNA libraries construction and analyzed the RNA-sequencing data; D.L. performed pathogen inoculation and disease resistance assay, RNA analysis, protoplast transient expression assay and protein analysis in the revision; D.L., P.Y., J.T., T.L., L.L., J.L.Z., J.Z.L., and L.F. performed agronomic traits analysis; B.Y. and Y.Z.Y. performed map-based cloning; P.Y. and X.N.W. performed LC-MS/MS analysis; J.L. performed yeast two-hybrid assay; X.G., F.S., L.F., J.Y.L., Y.Z.Y., Z.Z., J.W., Y.D., X.S., and J.Z.L. developed materials; X.N.W., Y.D., and X.C. provided theoretical contributions to the project; X.G., F.S., Z.F., S.L., X.S., Z.H., and J.Z.L. analyzed the data and wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xianwei Song, Zuhua He or Junzhong Liu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Jessie Fernandez, Brian Gregory, and Reina Komiya for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Peer Review File

Description of Additional Supplementary Files

Supplementary Data 1

Supplementary Data 2

Supplementary Data 3

Supplementary Data 4

Supplementary Data 5

Supplementary Data 6

Supplementary Data 7

Reporting Summary

Source data

Source Data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gu, X., Si, F., Feng, Z. et al. The OsSGS3-tasiRNA-OsARF3 module orchestrates abiotic-biotic stress response trade-off in rice. Nat Commun 14, 4441 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-40176-2

Download citation

Received: 19 November 2022
Accepted: 14 July 2023
Published: 24 July 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-40176-2

This article is cited by

Heat Stress Responsive Aux/IAA Protein, OsIAA29 Regulates Grain Filling Through OsARF17 Mediated Auxin Signaling Pathway
- Zhanghao Chen
- Wei Zhou
- Jialing Yao
Rice (2024)
The complex transcriptional regulation of heat stress response in maize
- Mingxiu Ruan
- Heng Zhao
- Leiming Wu
Stress Biology (2024)

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.