Persistent CO2 emissions and hydrothermal unrest following the 2015 earthquake in Nepal

Girault, Frédéric; Adhikari, Lok Bijaya; France-Lanord, Christian; Agrinier, Pierre; Koirala, Bharat P.; Bhattarai, Mukunda; Mahat, Sudhan S.; Groppo, Chiara; Rolfo, Franco; Bollinger, Laurent; Perrier, Frédéric

doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05138-z

Download PDF

Article
Open access
Published: 27 July 2018

Persistent CO₂ emissions and hydrothermal unrest following the 2015 earthquake in Nepal

Nature Communications volume 9, Article number: 2956 (2018) Cite this article

4376 Accesses
37 Citations
20 Altmetric
Metrics details

Subjects

Abstract

Fluid–earthquake interplay, as evidenced by aftershock distributions or earthquake-induced effects on near-surface aquifers, has suggested that earthquakes dynamically affect permeability of the Earth’s crust. The connection between the mid-crust and the surface was further supported by instances of carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions associated with seismic activity, so far only observed in magmatic context. Here we report spectacular non-volcanic CO₂ emissions and hydrothermal disturbances at the front of the Nepal Himalayas following the deadly 25 April 2015 Gorkha earthquake (moment magnitude M_w = 7.8). The data show unambiguously the appearance, after the earthquake, sometimes with a delay of several months, of CO₂ emissions at several sites separated by > 10 kilometres, associated with persistent changes in hydrothermal discharges, including a complete cessation. These observations reveal that Himalayan hydrothermal systems are sensitive to co- and post- seismic deformation, leading to non-stationary release of metamorphic CO₂ from active orogens. Possible pre-seismic effects need further confirmation.

Near-collapse of the geomagnetic field may have contributed to atmospheric oxygenation and animal radiation in the Ediacaran Period

Article Open access 02 May 2024

Venus water loss is dominated by HCO+ dissociative recombination

Article 06 May 2024

Widespread two-layered melt structure in the asthenosphere

Article 03 May 2024

Introduction

Understanding fluid–earthquake interplay has long received a lot of attention¹. For the last 20 years, there has been a growing number of evidence for fluid-driven earthquakes². Deep fluids have been shown controlling aftershock distribution in the tectonic contexts of rifting^3,4,5, subduction^6,7, and reverse⁸ and strike-slip faulting⁹. Contemporaneously, numerous observations of earthquake-induced effects on near-surface aquifers have been reported¹⁰, including mainly changes in stream and spring discharge^11,12,13, groundwater level^14,15 and temperature^16,17,18,19 in various tectonic contexts. These observations have suggested that earthquakes dynamically affect permeability of the Earth’s crust^20,21. Carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions were observed in association with seismicity in the case of the Matsushiro swarm⁹ in Japan or, recently, at the Lassen volcano²² (Cascades Range, USA) and in the Eger Rift²³ (Czech Republic), which suggests connection between the mid-crust and the ground surface through gas transport. However, such examples so far were only observed in the presence of magmatic activity.

The Himalayan orogen results from the India–Eurasia collision²⁴, the Main Himalayan Thrust (MHT) accommodating at 2 cm year⁻¹ half of the shortening between the two continents²⁵. The largest earthquake in Nepal before 2015, the 1934 Bihar-Nepal earthquake (moment magnitude M_w~ 8.2) in Eastern Nepal, which claimed >15,000 lives, ruptured the MHT up to the surface over 150 kilometres along the Main Frontal Thrust²⁶. Inter-seismic deformation is associated with intense background seismicity²⁷, with 4–5 events of local magnitude M_L > 5 per year, concentrated between 10 and 25 kilometres depth at the foot of the Himalayan topographic rise²⁸. This region – the Main Central Thrust (MCT) zone²⁹ – also exhibits numerous hydrothermal systems³⁰ (Fig. 1). Following evidence of degassing from chemical and isotopic analysis of hot springs and rivers^31,32, large CO₂ emissions were discovered near hot springs^30,33, with CO₂ fluxes at places similar to diffusive fluxes from active volcanoes^30,34. The seasonal and yearly stability of the soil–gas radon concentration time-series^34,35, the invariant radon–CO₂ fluxes relationship^30,36, and the results of watering experiments³⁶ at selected sites attest to the remarkable temporal stability of these hydrothermal systems, even during monsoon. These non-volcanic CO₂ emissions are characterised by radiogenic helium, high radon content, and carbon isotopic compositions suggesting metamorphic CO₂ production at >5 kilometres depth^30,31,32,34. In the accepted conceptual model^31,32, from the decarbonation source at >5 kilometres depth, CO₂ percolates through fracture networks in the MCT zone, where it mixes with meteoric water. Near the water table, a fraction of CO₂ may degas, and water discharges eventually at the surface as a hot spring. Degassed CO₂ may also be transported faster to the surface through a network of interrelated faults without interaction with hydrothermal circulations³⁷.

The M_w = 7.8 25 April 2015 Gorkha earthquake³⁸ (Fig. 1) caused >9000 deaths, with fatality rates >1% in mountainous areas north of Kathmandu³⁹, reaching 100% at some places⁴⁰. It partly ruptured the MHT along a 120-kilometre-long segment east from the epicentre⁴¹, whose northern limit coincides with the MCT zone (Fig. 1), releasing only partially the stored elastic energy sufficient to produce a possible M_w~ 9 mega-earthquake⁴². The mainshock was followed by an intense aftershock sequence⁴³, with >90 (M_L > 5) events over a year. From 25 April 2015 to 31 December 2017, >10,200 (M_L > 3), >1100 (M_L > 4) and >135 (M_L > 5) earthquakes occurred in Central Nepal (Fig. 1), leading to the most important seismic crisis in Nepal since 1934. The Gorkha earthquake is the first large Himalayan earthquake with seismic⁴³ and Global Positioning System^44,45 (GPS) data, as well as prior data on hydrothermal systems and CO₂ emissions³⁰.

In this paper, we report spectacular outbursts of CO₂ and hydrothermal disturbances at several sites in Central Nepal separated by >10 kilometres that have been triggered by the 2015 Gorkha earthquake. These observations, in particular the first earthquake-induced gaseous changes in the absence of magmatic activity, reveal high sensitivity of Himalayan hydrothermal systems to co-, post- and possibly pre- seismic deformation, and non-stationary release of metamorphic CO₂ from active orogens.

Results

Outbursts of CO₂ triggered by the Gorkha earthquake

New CO₂ emissions were observed after the Gorkha earthquake, sometimes spatially associated with substantial changes from the pre-existing CO₂ emissions (Table 1 and Supplementary Table 1). Because a large number of CO₂ flux measurements (see Methods) were made before (n = 1718; December 2006 – January 2011) and after the earthquake (n = 1053; November 2015 – January 2018), a quantitative comparison of CO₂ emissions before and after the earthquake can be undertaken in the Upper Trisuli valley. Spectacular effects were observed first in Syabru-Bensi, 56 kilometres east from the epicentre (Fig. 1), a site that had been extensively studied from 2006 to 2011. The main gas emission zone, located above the hot springs (Fig. 2; Supplementary Fig. 1), on the west bank of the Trisuli river, changed substantially. Significant CO₂ fluxes and discharges appeared near the dwellings above the previously existing gas zone, in a cultivated area where flux level was close to local background levels before 2009. Hydrogen sulphide is now frequently smelled inside the houses. Total CO₂ discharge in the area now reaches 1010 ± 110 mmol s⁻¹ (3.8 ± 0.4 ton d⁻¹), corresponding to an increase factor of 2.1 ± 0.3 (Fig. 2). Fluxes at two reference locations (K+6 and K+12; Fig. 2), regularly monitored since November 2015 (Fig. 3), peaked in November 2016 and, in January 2018, continued to remain 2-order of magnitude higher than their pre-seismic values. By contrast, the cavity characterised by the largest pre-earthquake CO₂ fluxes ( >10⁵ g m⁻² d⁻¹) showed one-order-of-magnitude smaller CO₂ emission after the earthquake (Supplementary Fig. 4). The cavity fluxes returned to pre-earthquake values in January 2018, more than 2.7 years after the mainshock.

Table 1 Post-seismic effects on the carbon dioxide emissions at five hydrothermal sites in Central Nepal. Data of CO₂ flux, total CO₂ discharge, and carbon isotopic ratio of CO₂ emissions are compiled before and after the Gorkha earthquake

Full size table

New CO₂ emissions and changes in pre-existing CO₂ emissions were also observed at other locations in the same valley (Supplementary Fig. 5). In Timure, nine kilometres to the north, CO₂ emissions tripled after the earthquake (in November 2015 and January 2016) along a profile which had been measured precisely at different times before 2011 (Supplementary Fig. 6). Repeated measurements in September 2017 yielded a post-seismic CO₂ emission increase of a factor of 8 ± 3 compared with pre-earthquake values. By contrast, at the Chilime hot spring site, seven kilometres to the west of Timure (Fig. 1), while CO₂ fluxes remain significant, the total discharge is reduced by a factor of 5.2 ± 1.7 in January 2016, and by a factor of 25 ± 8 in January 2018. The CO₂ emissions in Timure and Chilime thus depict opposite and unstabilized post-seismic responses > 2.7 years after the mainshock.

Two kilometres to the west of Chilime, at the Sanjen hydropower construction site (Fig. 1), spectacular bubbling was suddenly noticed, beginning of November 2015, in two 40-metre-deep piezometers whose water level was being monitored. When construction resumed during 2016, CO₂ emissions appeared at several locations in a tunnel being excavated nearby (Supplementary Fig. 7 and Movie 1). The CO₂ emission in the tunnel was still present in January 2018. The CO₂ concentration in the air of the tunnel then ranged from 4 to 5 vol%, thus creating a major health hazard, and the total CO₂ discharge was estimated in the tunnel to 580 ± 150 mmol s⁻¹ (2.2 ± 0.6 ton d⁻¹), hence of the same order as the main Syabru-Bensi discharge.

In the Budhi Gandaki valley, 16.5 kilometres to the epicentre (Fig. 1), the highest CO₂ emissions ever reported in Central Nepal were observed in January 2017 on the partly flooded riverbank, where no phenomenon had been known to the locals before the earthquake (Supplementary Movie 2). The CO₂ emission was still present in January 2018, with a total discharge higher than 1240 ± 330 mmol s⁻¹ (4.7 ± 1.3 ton d⁻¹), similar to the whole CO₂ discharge observed in Syabru-Bensi. In addition to the flux from the bank, an innovative method was used to measure the CO₂ flux from and through the hot water pond (see Methods and Supplementary Fig. 8). This is the most spectacular new CO₂ emission observed so far in the Himalayas and elsewhere in the absence of volcanic activity. Together with the Upper Trisuli valley (Syabru-Bensi, Sanjen and Timure), such a persistent post-seismic CO₂ outburst is unusual. For instance, small outbursts following the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake in China lasted only a few months⁴⁶. In the Marsyandi valley, further west (Fig. 1), by contrast, no comparable phenomenon was observed and peak CO₂ fluxes (5300 to 28,700 g m⁻² d⁻¹), while significant, are smaller than in the Upper Trisuli valley.

All these CO₂ emissions were quantified in the field during the dry season or in absence of rain, as shown by the 2015–2017 rainfall data in Dhunche (seven kilometres southwest to Syabru-Bensi) and Timure (Fig. 3). At a given site, the CO₂ flux data were obtained before and after the earthquake at about the same periods under similar meteorological conditions. Besides, the observed changes in the CO₂ emission were done contemporary at several sites separated by more than 10 kilometres. All these care and observations preclude to these changes any environmental, meteorological or shallow origin.

Carbon isotopic ratio of the CO₂ emissions (δ¹³C; see Methods) was systematically measured at all occurrences (Table 1 and Supplementary Table 1), giving the most comprehensive data set (n = 77) so far in a seismically active area without magmatic activity. Along the rupture zone, average δ¹³C values range from –6.9 ‰ to –0.1 ‰, and appear similar at the various sites of a given valley. CO₂ emissions in Sanjen and Syabru-Bensi, although separated by eight kilometres, have comparable CO₂ concentration (96–98%) and δ¹³C signature (from –0.9 ‰ to –0.7 ‰), precluding shallow sources, but instead suggesting similar CO₂ source and transport from a crustal-scale reservoir. In addition, the δ¹³C values remain relatively stable after the earthquake (Supplementary Fig. 4), indicating that the earthquake revealed a pre-existing CO₂ reservoir.

Hydrothermal unrest triggered by the Gorkha earthquake

The CO₂ emissions were associated with changes of hydrothermal activity (Table 2 and Supplementary Table 2). In Syabru-Bensi, new hot springs appeared after the earthquake, with a few persisting in January 2018, > 2.7 years after the mainshock. The temperature of the main Syabru-Bensi hot spring (SBP0), which had been stable at 60.7 ± 0.1 °C for more than 12 years before the earthquake (Fig. 3), increased to 64.1 ± 0.3 °C after the earthquake (November 2015 – January 2016), along with a significant flow rate increase of 16 ± 1%. Water temperature peaked about 1 year after the mainshock. Water warming of SBP0 persisted more than 2 years after the mainshock, before starting to decrease to pre-earthquake values in January 2018, more than 2.7 years after. Other springs in Syabru-Bensi (SBB5) also showed warming, persisting in January 2018 (Supplementary Fig. 9). A slight pre-seismic water-cooling was possibly detected in Syabru-Bensi (Fig. 3). More significantly, three other hot springs of the same valley (Timure, Langtang and Chilime) also showed cooling a few weeks before the earthquake (Supplementary Fig. 9). In Tatopani (Budhi Gandaki valley), locals reported hot spring temperature decrease a few weeks before the earthquake. While co-, post- and sometimes pre- seismic changes in hot spring temperature have been reported in the literature^16,19, a two-year-long or longer warming is unusual.

Table 2 Post-seismic effects on the hot springs at nine hydrothermal sites in Central Nepal. Data of temperature, flow rate, and dissolved inorganic carbon concentration and isotopic ratio of hot springs are compiled before and after the Gorkha earthquake

Full size table

The most spectacular change in hydrothermal activity, however, is the complete cessation of the Chilime hot spring at the end of October 2015, after periods of unusual intermittence between April and June 2015 (Supplementary Fig. 10). Before the earthquake, this spring had a stable flow rate of > 5 L s⁻¹; it was the pillar of local economy, being the most important in Central Nepal after the Kodari hot spring (Fig. 1). The village elders had previously reported spring intermittence at the time of the 1934 earthquake, but no cessation. Particularly impressive is the fact that it happened at about the time of the CO₂ outburst in Sanjen.

Dissolved Inorganic Carbon (DIC) concentration and isotopic ratio (C_DIC and δ¹³C_DIC; see Methods) were systematically measured for all hot spring waters (Table 2 and Supplementary Table 2). In Syabru-Bensi, where the number of measurements is significant (n = 8), C_DIC of the SBP0 hot spring increased by 29 ± 2% after the mainshock and, in September 2017, returned to values measured before the mainshock (Fig. 3), while Ca and Na concentrations remained similar within 5%. The δ¹³C_DIC decreased also significantly (Supplementary Fig. 11). These observations suggest a larger amount of dissolved carbon in the SBP0 hot spring after the earthquake, which is compatible with the aforementioned increase in gaseous CO₂ emissions. Available pH values (Supplementary Fig. 9) also show a slow return to pre-earthquake values, with anomalously high values before the earthquake, a fact to be interpreted with caution given the lack of additional geochemical information. In Syabru-Bensi, dissolved radon and radium concentrations in SBP0 and SBB5 hot springs changed after the earthquake (Supplementary Fig. 9). In January 2018, >2.7 years after the mainshock, the warmest spring in Syabru-Bensi (SBP0) returned to pre-earthquake conditions, while those more dependent on superficial effects (e.g., SBB5) did not yet.

First non-volcanic earthquake-induced gaseous changes

Hydrologic responses to seismic stimulation have been observed in numerous instances¹⁰, and correlated with Seismic Energy Density (SED) or Peak Ground Velocity (PGV) values. In Lassen (Cascades Range, USA) for example, a 2014 volcano-seismic swarm peaking at M_w = 3.85 at 5.7 kilometres distance, corresponding to SED∼0.2 J m⁻³ and PGV∼0.2 cm s⁻¹, caused an outburst of geothermal fluids, explained by a two-fold permeability increase²². In the case of the Matsushiro earthquake swarm in Japan, modelling indicates the necessity of a 2-order-of-magnitude permeability increase with a small overpressure of only a few megapascals⁹. In Syabru-Bensi, the Gorkha earthquake produced SED∼63 J m⁻³ and PGV∼26 cm s⁻¹ (see Methods; Supplementary Table 3), hence strong enough to affect the hydrothermal system, with several aftershocks maintaining high ground motion during the following 31 months (Supplementary Fig. 12). These estimates are confirmed by GPS time-series of the Chilime station^44,45 (Fig. 1), giving PGV∼49 cm s⁻¹ (Supplementary Fig. 13). While the first clearly documented instances in the Himalayas, our observed near-field CO₂ outbursts and hydrothermal unrest remain compatible with previously compiled earthquake-induced changes (Supplementary Fig. 14). Our observed changes in the CO₂ emissions are however the first earthquake-induced gaseous changes in a non-volcanic region.

Discussion

The observations following the Gorkha earthquake give some indications that the standard model, where CO₂ is degassed from hydrothermal waters, needs some modifications at least in part. Indeed, previous work in Syabru-Bensi³⁴ identified large CO₂ emissions without the presence of an important hot spring in the vicinity. Now, the evidence for an extended reservoir of crustal CO₂ is overwhelming, which we accommodate with the following conceptual models (Fig. 4). In the case of the Trisuli valley (Syabru-Bensi and Timure) (Fig. 4a, b), hydrothermal circulations are important and increased after the earthquake. The main CO₂ source can therefore be the hydrothermal circulations, with near surface degassing and subsurface accumulation in the whole fault zone. Possible additional CO₂ can also be released in the footwall directly from the production source. The earthquake caused (Fig. 4b) an increasing water discharge, with increased CO₂ degassing, or better communication to the surface of previously accumulated CO₂. In the case of the Chilime valley (Chilime, Sanjen and Brapche) (Fig. 4c, d), however, the pervading presence of CO₂, revealed by the earthquake, kilometres away from hot springs, is better explained if CO₂ is directly accumulated from below, possibly through the water table, without advection by hydrothermal circulations.

Strikingly, CO₂ emissions with similar isotopic anomaly were observed over the whole region, whenever faults, boreholes or a tunnel gave the opportunity. These observations also attest the presence of a large, relatively shallow, reservoir of CO₂ in the Himalayan crust, suggesting that metamorphic CO₂ produced at depth is huge, as independently shown by petrological estimates^47,48, and unlikely sequestered. Nevertheless, as hot water could also be found when deep boreholes are available, the overwhelming presence of hot water could match the evidence of an extended CO₂ reservoir, and the debate cannot be considered as closed.

The effects of the earthquake on our hydrothermal systems are not unexpected. Indeed, our observed CO₂ emissions appear consistent with hydrothermal outburst effects, as observed in Lassen²², suggesting that apparent two-fold permeability increases and/or changes in hydrothermal pathways for pre-existing CO₂ emissions could have been major effects of the Gorkha earthquake. First-order modelling indeed confirms that at least a doubling of permeability could explain CO₂ flux increases (Supplementary Fig. 15). In addition, first-order modelling supports that a lasting permeability increase¹⁸ of 10–20% could accommodate the Syabru-Bensi hot spring warming and increased flow (Supplementary Figs. 16 and 17). These vertical permeability increases appear compatible with post-seismic afterslip⁴⁵. The global pre-seismic water-cooling could be evidence for a pre-seismic dilatancy effect⁴⁹ of the impending rupture zone.

Compared with reported earthquake-induced hydrological effects^10,16,19,46, some of our observations are unusual: first, the six-month delay of the Sanjen CO₂ outburst and the shut down of the Chilime hot spring, and second, the persistence (and rising at some places) > 2.7 years after in January 2018 of all the increased CO₂ emissions and hydrothermal unrest. In Lassen²², the permeability increase was inferred to be maintained for 50–60 days. In the Napa valley¹³, a vertical permeability change, following diffusion of a pressure pulse, was proposed to explain post-seismic stream discharge, suggesting basin-scale fluid diffusivity of 0.1 m² s⁻¹. Taking this conservative value, for one-kilometre spatial scale, the timescale for fluid displacement is ~ 120 days, compatible with our six-month delay time. This suggests that the Sanjen CO₂ outburst and the Chilime cessation likely result from hydrogeological fluid diffusion.

Other explanations are, however, possible. In Central Nepal, post-seismic deformation (afterslip on the MHT) and associated aftershocks remained active several months after the mainshock. About 6 months after the mainshock, contemporaneous with the Sanjen outburst and the Chilime cessation (Fig. 3a), the number of seismic events producing PGV>1 cm s⁻¹ in Syabru-Bensi increased, and a linear trend in the GPS time-series, continuing to October 2017 about 2.5 years after the mainshock, was initiated. Thus, some post-seismic CO₂ emissions and hydrothermal unrest may be related to changes in the state of post-seismic relaxation. Incidentally, the time of the Sanjen outburst and the Chilime cessation coincides with renewal of aftershock activity near Syabru-Bensi in the fall of 2015 (Fig. 3a), including an M_L = 5.3 event a few weeks before. In addition, two M_L > 4 events occurred at about the same time (end of October – beginning of November), less than 15 kilometres from Syabru-Bensi, producing PGV > 1 cm s⁻¹ (Supplementary Table 3).

The Himalayan hydrothermal systems appear highly sensitive to small deformation rates and are therefore in near-critical condition. This suggests that post-seismic relaxation of co-seismic stress may result from pore pressure changes, and that metamorphic CO₂ may in turn play a role in the installation of the next inter-seismic regime. Alternatively, the still evolving CO₂ emissions in Syabru-Bensi, Timure and Chilime may also indicate a currently unstabilized system, able to diverge unpredictably. Given the issue of a pending mega-earthquake in the region⁴², long-term monitoring of CO₂ emissions should seriously be considered as a chance to capture possible pre-earthquake signals.

In this paper, we have presented the first assessment of CO₂ emissions triggered by a major earthquake, demonstrating the coupling between mechanical deformation and fluid transport properties at the crustal scale, highlighting that crustal deformation dynamically affects permeability during the seismic cycle. The large post-seismic CO₂ emissions observed in the Narayani basin suggest non-stationary metamorphic CO₂ production, and that its current estimate^30,32 (>1.3 × 10¹⁰ mol year⁻¹ with >(1.0 ± 0.2) × 10⁸ mol year⁻¹ from direct gaseous CO₂ emissions), independently confirmed by petrological studies⁴⁸, may be enhanced during a significant fraction of the seismic cycle. Metamorphic CO₂ and its transport therefore emerge as an essential component of mountain build-up and the associated dynamics of large earthquakes.

Methods

Carbon dioxide flux measurement and mapping

The accumulation chamber method⁵⁰ was used to measure surface CO₂ flux and to quantify the total CO₂ discharge of a given site and the associated uncertainties, whose assessment is based on numerous systematic tests and our 10-year experience³⁴. The method is robust, even in remote locations⁵¹ and during the monsoon³⁶, and allows the measurement of CO₂ fluxes over more than five orders of magnitude (Supplementary Fig. 2). The increase in CO₂ concentration in the chamber is measured using various portable infrared CO₂ sensors (Testo™ 535, Testo AG, Germany; Airwatch™ PM 1500, Geotechnical Instruments Ltd., UK; Vaisala™ CARBOCAP® Hand-Held GM70, Finland), that are regularly inter-calibrated in the laboratory. The CO₂ flux is expressed in grams per squared metre per day (g m⁻² d⁻¹). The total CO₂ discharge, expressed in mol s⁻¹ (or ton d⁻¹), is estimated using the CO₂ flux data-set by kriging and interpolation procedures³⁴. CO₂ fluxes (n = 1720) and total CO₂ discharges obtained before the Gorkha earthquake (from 2006 to 2011) are published elsewhere^30,33,34,51. Here we present for the first time CO₂ fluxes (n = 1668) and total discharges obtained after the earthquake in the Marsyandi, Budhi Gandaki and Upper Trisuli valleys relying on seven measurement campaigns carried out in November 2015, in January, May and November 2016, in January and September 2017, and in January 2018. Pre-earthquake and post-earthquake campaigns were performed outside the monsoon periods to reduce the meteorological effects on CO₂ flux data. Every uncertainty is given around one-sigma standard deviation (68% confidence level) and averages are arithmetic means except otherwise stated. Data are summarised in Table 1 and Supplementary Table 1.

Carbon dioxide flux measurement through a water layer

The bubbling CO₂ flux from or through water was measured at the new degassing site of Machhakhola (Budhi Gandaki valley) in the following manner. A collecting container was installed upside down on the water with a pipe leading to an accumulation chamber installed on the ground nearby (Supplementary Fig. 8). Then, the flux was measured in this accumulation chamber as described above. This method yielded a minimum value to the large CO₂ discharge observed in Machhakhola (Supplementary Movie 2).

Carbon isotopic composition of the gas phase

We sampled gas in the field using evacuated glass tubes. CO₂ fraction of the gas sample was determined manometrically. The δ¹³C of CO₂ of the gas, expressed in per mil relative to the standard values of Vienna Pee Dee Belemnite (V-PDB), was measured after off-line purification by mass spectrometry on a Finnigan™ MAT-253 mass spectrometer (Thermo Electron Corp., Germany) in CRPG (Nancy, France)^32,34. External repeatability of a given sample was ±0.1 ‰. The twenty δ¹³C values measured before the Gorkha earthquake are published elsewhere^30,33,34,52. Fifty-seven measurements were carried out after the earthquake from January 2016 to January 2018. Data are summarised in Table 1 and Supplementary Table 1.

Water temperature, pH and flow rate measurements

To measure water temperature of springs, we used thermometers (Generic TP101 Digital Thermometer, China) regularly inter-calibrated in the laboratory with a reference thermometer not currently used in the field (Digital Thermometer model 4400 Ertco Eutechnics, USA), and compared with high-precision (10⁻³ °C) and high-sensitivity (10⁻⁴ °C) thermometers (Seabird™ 39plus, Sea-Bird Scientific, USA). Due to the time response of the instruments, several minutes are needed to measure temperature. Experimental uncertainty of a given measurement was ±0.1 °C. The pH of the water in thermal springs was measured with various pH metres (H170 Portable pH metre, Hach, Germany; HI98107 and HI98130 pH metres, Hanna Instruments, USA), systematically recalibrated in the field using buffer solutions. Experimental uncertainty of a given measurement was ±0.1. The flow rate of thermal springs was determined using stopwatch and measured cylinders or buckets and was repeated at least three times. Data are summarised in Table 2 and Supplementary Table 2.

Carbon isotopic composition and DIC concentration in water

We sampled every water in the field using two to three glass screw cap vials of 12 millilitres volume each. DIC concentration (C_DIC = [H₂CO₃] + [HCO₃^–] + [CO₃^2–]) and its isotopic composition (δ¹³C_DIC), expressed in mmol L⁻¹ and in per mil relative to V-PDB, respectively, were determined using a gas chromatograph coupled to an isotope ratio mass spectrometer (GCIRMS, GV 2003, GV Instruments, UK) in IPGP (Paris, France). The whole procedure is described elsewhere⁵³. The relative experimental uncertainty of C_DIC was 1–2% and the experimental uncertainty of a given δ¹³C_DIC measurement was ±0.1‰. For a given sample, final values correspond to weighted arithmetic averages of two to three measurements. The C_DIC and δ¹³C_DIC values measured before the Gorkha earthquake are published elsewhere^30,31,32,33. A total of 71 measurements were carried out after the earthquake from January 2016 to January 2018. Data are summarised in Table 2 and Supplementary Table 2.

Water radon-222 and radium-226 concentration measurements

Dissolved radon concentration in water was measured in the field by emanometry in air⁵⁴. After air–water equilibrium is reached by manual shaking, radon concentration is inferred from scintillation flask sampling and photomultiplier counting, as described elsewhere⁵¹. Radon concentration in water is expressed in Bq L⁻¹. Experimental uncertainty ranged from 5 to 30%. The radium concentration in water was similarly measured in the IPGP laboratory after keeping the bottle closed for at least 50–80 days⁵⁵. Expressed in mBq L⁻¹, the experimental uncertainty was the same as for radon concentration in water. Here we present only the dissolved radon and radium concentrations in the main Syabru-Bensi hot springs (Supplementary Fig. 9).

Detection of thermal springs and CO₂ degassing areas

The CO₂ degassing areas were detected based on pervasive hydrogen sulphide odour, measurement of high radon-222 flux (radioactive gas of half-life 3.8 days), surface temperature anomalies, occurrence of water bubbles, presence of cavities, occurrence of inactive or active travertine deposits, and discussion with local people, or a combination of the above^30,51. In remote places, the detection of previously unknown thermal springs relied on the use of hand-held thermal infrared cameras^34,35,51 (model 880-V3 before 2015 and model 875-1i after, Testo™ AG, Germany).

Determination of SED, PGV and PDS

At the sites which experienced the most significant post-seismic changes in CO₂ emissions and hot springs, we calculated SED⁵⁶ and vertical PGV⁵⁷ produced by the Gorkha earthquake and its main aftershocks. Empirical equations are used to estimate SED⁵⁶ and PGV⁵⁸. Peak Dynamic Stress (PDS) is estimated using: PGV × shear modulus (3 × 10¹⁰ Pa) / shear wave velocity (3500 km s⁻¹). For the mainshock and six main aftershocks, values of SED, PGV and PDS at eight hydrothermal sites are gathered in Supplementary Table 3. In addition, SED, PGV and PDS produced at sites of the Upper Trisuli valley by three aftershocks located near Syabru-Bensi are also given.

Determination of Seismic Moment Release Rate

We calculated the Seismic Moment Release Rate (SMRR) produced by the aftershocks of the Gorkha earthquake using the NSC earthquake catalogue from 25 April 2015 to 31 December 2017. We converted local magnitude (M_L) given by the catalogue into moment magnitude (M_w), using the following linear calibration: M_w= 1.109 M_L – 0.626. The seismic moment was obtained using the classical relationship: log(M₀) = 1.5M_w + 9.1. The SMRR, expressed in N.m per 20 days, was calculated for all seismic events around Syabru-Bensi and is shown in Fig. 3.

Modelling of earthquake-induced changes

To study the effect of permeability changes on CO₂ flux before and after the earthquake, we used a 2-D model, described elsewhere³⁷, in which a vertical fault (f) surrounded by two media (a and b) transports the gaseous CO₂ to the surface by advection. Each medium is characterised by connected porosity (ε) and permeability (k). A pressure source is fixed at depth. Darcy’s law is defined according to a pressure distribution (p) that follows Δp² = 0 (ref.⁵⁹). An example calculation is shown in Supplementary Fig. 15.

To study the effect of permeability changes on spring water flow rate at the surface, we adapted the 2-D fault model described above³⁷, to the calculation of water flow rate. We consider a vertical fault (f) driving the water flow to the surface, surrounded by two media (a and b). Each medium is characterised by permeability (k). Pressure source is fixed at depth. Solutions of the pressure distribution are expressed as a sum of exponential terms on horizontal axis, modulated by a sinusoidal signal along vertical axis³⁷. An example of calculation is shown in Supplementary Fig. 16.

To study the effect of water flow rate changes on hot spring exit temperature, we relied on an analytical first-order model⁶⁰ (Supplementary Fig. 17a). We consider a vertical conduit, characterised by perimeter p and thermal conductivity K_T, that drives hot water from depth (z = h) to the surface (z = 0), with flow rate Q, density ρ and specific heat C_P. Temperature at depth h is defined by T(h) = βh + T(0), where β is the thermal gradient, which is poorly constrained in this hydrothermal region⁶¹ and taken equal to 55–75 °C km⁻¹. We consider a quasi-static state having characteristic length λ_T and we define θ = T–T(0) and α = ρC_PQλ_T/(pK_Th). Using the initial conditions, the differential equation αh(dθ/dz) + θ = –βz has the following solution: θ = αhβ(1–e^–1/α). Examples of calculation of the water temperature as a function of water flow rate, for two values of the thermal gradient, are shown in Supplementary Fig. 17b.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available in the article, in Supplementary Information, and from the corresponding author upon request (girault@ipgp.fr).

References

Irwin, W. P. & Barnes, I. Tectonic relations of carbon dioxide discharges and earthquakes. J. Geophys. Res. 85, 3115–3121 (1980).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Miller, S. A. Chapter 1 - The role of fluids in tectonic and earthquake processes. Adv. Geophys. 54, 1–46 (2013).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Noir, J. et al. Fluid flow triggered migration of events in the 1989 Dobi earthquake sequence of Central Afar. Geophys. Res. Lett. 24, 2335–2338 (1997).
Article ADS Google Scholar
Miller, S. A. et al. Aftershocks driven by a high-pressure CO₂ source at depth. Nature 427, 724–727 (2004).
Article ADS PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Terakawa, T., Zoporowski, A., Galvan, B. & Miller, S. A. High-pressure fluid at hypocentral depths in the L’Aquila region inferred from earthquake focal mechanisms. Geology 38, 995–998 (2010).
Article ADS Google Scholar
Waldhauser, F., Schaff, D. P., Diehl, T. & Engdahl, E. R. Splay faults imaged by fluid-driven aftershocks of the 2004 M_w 9.2 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake. Geology 40, 243–246 (2012).
Article ADS Google Scholar
Wang, Z., Huang, W., Zhao, D. & Pei, S. Mapping the Tohoku forearc: Implications for the mechanism of the 2011 East Japan earthquake (M_w 9.0). Tectonophysics 524-525, 147–154 (2012).
Article ADS Google Scholar
Sibson, R. H. An episode of fault-valve behaviour during compressional inversion? — The 2004 M_J6.8 Mid-Niigata Prefecture, Japan, earthquake sequence. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 257, 188–199 (2007).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Cappa, F., Rutqvist, J. & Yamamoto, K. Modeling crustal deformation and rupture processes related to upwelling of deep CO₂-rich fluids during the 1965–1967 Matsushiro earthquake swarm in Japan. J. Geophys. Res. 114, B10304 (2009).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Wang, C.-Y. & Manga, M. Earthquakes and water. Lect. Notes Earth Sci. 114, 235 (2010).
Google Scholar
Muir-Wood, R. & King, G. C. P. Hydrological signatures of earthquake strain. J. Geophys. Res. 98, 22035–22068 (1993).
Article ADS Google Scholar
Sato, T., Sakai, R., Furuya, K. & Kodama, T. Coseismic spring flow changes associated with the 1995 Kobe earthquake. Geophys. Res. Lett. 27, 1219–1222 (2000).
Article ADS Google Scholar
Wang, C.-Y. & Manga, M. New streams and springs after the 2014 M_w6.0 South Napa earthquake. Nat. Commun. 6, 7597 (2015).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Roeloffs, E. A. Persistent water level changes in a well near Parkfield, California, due to local and distant earthquakes. J. Geophys. Res. 103, 869–889 (1998).
Article ADS Google Scholar
Brodsky, E. E., Roeloffs, E., Woodcock, D., Gall, I. & Manga, M. A mechanism for sustained groundwater pressure changes induced by distant earthquakes. J. Geophys. Res. 108, 2390 (2003).
Article ADS Google Scholar
Mogi, K., Mochizuki, H. & Kurokawa, Y. Temperature changes in an artesian spring at Usami in the Izu Peninsula (Japan) and their relation to earthquakes. Tectonophysics 159, 95–108 (1989).
Article ADS Google Scholar
Ma, Z. et al. Earthquake Prediction: Nine Major Earthquakes in China (1966–1976) (Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 1990).
Wang, C.-Y., Manga, M., Wang, C.-H. & Chen, C.-H. Transient change in groundwater temperature after earthquakes. Geology 40, 119–122 (2012).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Cox, S. C. et al. Changes in hot spring temperature and hydrogeology of the Alpine Fault hanging wall, New Zealand, induced by distal South Island earthquakes. Geofluids 15, 216–239 (2015).
Article Google Scholar
Manning, C. E. & Ingebritsen, S. E. Permeability of the continental crust: Implications of geothermal data and metamorphic systems. Rev. Geophys. 37, 127–150 (1999).
Article ADS Google Scholar
Manga, M. et al. Changes in permeability caused by transient stresses: Field observations, experiments, and mechanisms. Rev. Geophys. 50, RG2004 (2012).
Article ADS Google Scholar
Ingebritsen, S. E. et al. Hydrothermal response to a volcano-tectonic earthquake swarm, Lassen, California. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 9223–9230 (2015).
Article ADS Google Scholar
Fischer, T., Matyska, C. & Heinicke, J. Earthquake-enhanced permeability – evidence from carbon dioxide release following the M_L 3.5 earthquake in West Bohemia. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 460, 60–67 (2017).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Avouac, J.-P. Mountain building, erosion, and the seismic cycle in the Nepal Himalaya. Adv. Geophys. 46, 1–80 (2003).
Article ADS Google Scholar
Ader, T. et al. Convergence rate across the Nepal Himalaya and interseismic coupling on the Main Himalayan Thrust: Implications for seismic hazard. J. Geophys. Res. 117, B04403 (2012).
Article ADS Google Scholar
Sapkota, S. N. et al. Primary surface ruptures of the great Himalayan earthquakes in 1934 and 1255. Nat. Geosci. 6, 71–76 (2013).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Pandey, M. R., Tandukar, R. P., Avouac, J.-P., Lavfi, J. & Massot, J. P. Interseismic strain accumulation on the Himalayan crustal ramp (Nepal). Geophys. Res. Lett. 22, 751–754 (1995).
Article ADS Google Scholar
Bollinger, L., Avouac, J.-P., Cattin, R. & Pandey, M. R. Stress buildup in the Himalaya. J. Geophys. Res. 109, B11405 (2004).
Article ADS Google Scholar
Upreti, B. N. An overview of the stratigraphy and tectonics of the Nepal Himalaya. J. Asian Earth Sci. 17, 577–606 (1999).
Article ADS Google Scholar
Girault, F. et al. Large-scale organization of carbon dioxide discharge in the Nepal Himalayas. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 6358–6366 (2014).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Becker, J. A., Bickle, M. J., Galy, A. & Holland, T. J. B. Himalayan metamorphic CO₂ fluxes: Quantitative constraints from hydrothermal springs. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 265, 616–629 (2008).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Evans, M. J., Derry, L. A. & France-Lanord, C. Degassing of metamorphic carbon dioxide from the Nepal Himalaya. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 9, Q04021 (2008).
ADS Google Scholar
Perrier, F. et al. A direct evidence for high carbon dioxide and radon-222 discharge in Central Nepal. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 278, 198–207 (2009).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Girault, F. et al. The Syabru-Bensi hydrothermal system in central Nepal: 1. Characterization of carbon dioxide and radon fluxes. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 119, 4017–4055 (2014).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Richon, P. et al. Temporal signatures of advective versus diffusive radon transport at a geothermal zone in Central Nepal. J. Environ. Radioact. 102, 88–102 (2011).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Girault, F., Koirala, B. P., Perrier, F., Richon, P. & Rajaure, S. Persistence of radon-222 flux during monsoon at a geothermal zone in Nepal. J. Environ. Radioact. 100, 955–964 (2009).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Girault, F. & Perrier, F. The Syabru-Bensi hydrothermal system in central Nepal: 2. Modeling and significance of the radon signature. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 119, 4056–4089 (2014).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Avouac, J.-P., Meng, L., Wei, S., Wang, T. & Ampuero, J.-P. Lower edge of locked Main Himalayan Thrust unzipped by the 2015 Gorkha earthquake. Nat. Geosci. 8, 708–711 (2015).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Sapkota, S. N., Bollinger, L. & Perrier, F. Fatality rates of the M_w~8.2, 1934, Bihar–Nepal earthquake and comparison with the April 2015 Gorkha earthquake. Earth Planets Space 68, 40 (2016).
Article ADS Google Scholar
Martin, S. S., Hough, S. E. & Hung, C. Ground motions from the 2015 M_w 7.8 Gorkha, Nepal, earthquake constrained by a detailed assessment of macroseismic data. Seismol. Res. Lett. 86, 1524–1532 (2015).
Article Google Scholar
Grandin, R. et al. Rupture process of the M_w = 7.9 2015 Gorkha earthquake (Nepal): Insights into Himalayan megathrust segmentation. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 8373–8382 (2016).
Article ADS Google Scholar
Stevens, V. L. & Avouac, J.-P. Millenary M_w > 9.0 earthquakes required by geodetic strain in the Himalaya. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 1118–1123 (2016).
Article ADS Google Scholar
Adhikari, L. B. et al. The aftershock sequence of the April 25^th 2015 Gorkha-Nepal earthquake. Geophys. J. Int. 203, 2119–2124 (2015).
Article ADS Google Scholar
Galetzka, J. et al. Slip pulse and resonance of Kathmandu basin during the 2015 M_w 7.8 Gorkha earthquake, Nepal imaged with geodesy. Science 349, 1091–1095 (2015).
Article ADS PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Gualandi, A. et al. Pre- and post-seismic deformation related to the 2015, M_w7.8 Gorkha earthquake, Nepal. Tectonophysics 714-715, 90–106 (2017).
Article ADS Google Scholar
Zheng, G., Xu, S., Liang, S., Shi, P. & Zhao, J. Gas emission from the Qingzhu River after the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake, Southwest China. Chem. Geol. 339, 187–193 (2013).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Groppo, C., Rolfo, F., Castelli, D. & Mosca, P. Metamorphic CO₂ production in collisional orogens: Petrological constraints from phase diagram modeling of Himalayan, scapolite-bearing, calc-silicate rocks in the NKC(F)MAS(T)-HC system. J. Petrol. 58, 53–83 (2017).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Rapa, G. et al. Titanite-bearing calc-silicate rocks constrain timing, duration and magnitude of metamorphic CO₂ degassing in the Himalayan belt. Lithos 292–293, 364–378 (2017).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Scholz, C. H., Sykes, L. R. & Aggarwal, Y. P. Earthquake prediction – Physical basis. Science 181, 803–810 (1973).
Article ADS PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Chiodini, G., Cioni, R., Guidi, M., Raco, B. & Marini, L. Soil CO₂ flux measurements in volcanic and geothermal areas. Appl. Geochem. 13, 543–552 (1998).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Girault, F., Koirala, B. P., Bhattarai, M. & Perrier, F. Radon and carbon dioxide around remote Himalayan thermal springs. Geol. Soc. Lond. S. P. 451, 155–181 (2016).
Article Google Scholar
Becker, J. A. Quantification of Himalayan Metamorphic CO ₂ F luxes: Impact on Global Carbon Budgets. PhD Thesis, University of Cambridge (2005).
Assayag, N., Rivé, K., Ader, M., Jézéquel, D. & Agrinier, P. Improved method for isotopic and quantitative analysis of dissolved inorganic carbon in natural water samples. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 20, 2243–2251 (2006).
Article PubMed ADS CAS Google Scholar
Girault, F., Perrier, F. & Przylibski, T. A. Radon-222 and radium-226 occurrence in water: A review. Geol. Soc. Lond. Spec. Publ. 451, 131–154 (2016).
Article Google Scholar
Perrier, F., Aupiais, J., Girault, F., Przylibski, T. A. & Bouquerel, H. Optimized measurement of radium-226 concentration in liquid samples with radon-222 emanation. J. Environ. Radioact. 157, 52–59 (2016).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Wang, C.-Y. & Manga, M. Hydrologic responses to earthquakes and a general metric. Geofluids 10, 206–216 (2010).
Article Google Scholar
Elkhoury, J. E., Brodsky, E. E. & Agnew, D. C. Seismic waves increase permeability. Nature 441, 1135–1138 (2006).
Article ADS PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Akkar, S. & Bommer, J. J. Empirical equations for the prediction of PGA, PGV, and spectral accelerations in Europe, the Mediterranean Region, and the Middle East. Seismol. Res. Lett. 81, 195–206 (2010).
Article Google Scholar
Mosley, R. B., Menetrez, M. Y., Snoddy, R. & Brubaker Jr., S. A. The influences of diffusion and advective flow on the distribution of radon activity within USEPA’s soil chamber. Environ. Int. 22, S521–S533 (1996).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Vasseur, G., Michard, G. & Fouillac, C. Contraintes sur la structure profonde et le fonctionnement du système hydrothermal de Chaudes-Aigues (France). Bull. Hydrogéol. 4, 3–17 (1997).
Google Scholar
Derry, L. A., Evans, M. J., Darling, R. & France-Lanord, C. Hydrothermal heat flow near the Main Central Thrust, central Nepal Himalaya. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 286, 101–109 (2009).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Byrdina, S. et al. Dipolar self-potential anomaly associated with carbon dioxide and radon flux at Syabru-Bensi hot springs in central Nepal. J. Geophys. Res. 114, B10101 (2009).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Le Fort, P. Himalayas: Collided range, present knowledge of continental arc. Am. J. Sci. A275, 1–44 (1975).
Google Scholar
Kotarba, M. Hydrogeological investigations in Seti Khola and Trisuli thermal springs areas (Nepal Himalayas). Geologia 12, 37–51 (1986).
Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We warmly thank Soma Nath Sapkota and the Department of Mines and Geology for enthusiastic support over the years. We are indebted to Buddha Lama, Niraj Jairu and Ohm Tharum for assistance in the field, and to Nabin Tamang and Dawa Tamang for giving access to their property in Syabru-Bensi. Svetlana Byrdina is thanked for preparing the CO₂ flux data obtained in 2006–2007. We are thankful to Jean-Philippe Avouac, Steve Ingebritsen, Yves Gaudemer, Damien Jougnot, Christian Fouillac, Pascal Bernard, Hélène Lyon-Caen and Marc Chaussidon for fruitful discussions. Thomas Rigaudier is thanked for the measurement of carbon isotopic ratios in CRPG. Carine Chaduteau is thanked for the measurement of carbon isotopic ratios in IPGP. Narayan P. Malla is thanked for giving access to the Rasuwagadhi Hydroelectric Project. Hélène Bouquerel, François Prevot, Marie Bouih and Roxane Ferry are thanked for their participation in the fieldwork. Financial support for this work was essentially provided by public and private funding of the IPGP team “Physics of Natural Sites”, partially complemented in 2015 by a TelluS-SYSTER INSU CNRS funding to F.G. and in 2016 by a CNRS attribution to C.F.-L. This is IPGP contribution number 3942.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Physics of Natural Sites, Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Université Paris Diderot, CNRS UMR 7154, 1 rue Jussieu, F-75005, Paris, France
Frédéric Girault & Frédéric Perrier
Department of Mines and Geology, National Seismological Centre, Lainchaur, Kathmandu, Nepal
Lok Bijaya Adhikari, Bharat P. Koirala & Mukunda Bhattarai
Centre de Recherches Pétrographiques et Géochimiques, Université de Nancy, CNRS UMR 7358, F-54500, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France
Christian France-Lanord
Stable Isotopes Geochemistry, Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Université Paris Diderot, CNRS UMR 7154, 1 rue Jussieu, F-75005, Paris, France
Pierre Agrinier
Sanjen Jalavidhyut Company Limited, Lazimpat, Kathmandu, Nepal
Sudhan S. Mahat
Department of Earth Sciences, IGG-CNR, University of Turin, Via Verdi, 8, I-10124, Turin, Italy
Chiara Groppo & Franco Rolfo
CEA, DAM, DIF, F-91297, Arpajon, France
Laurent Bollinger

Authors

Frédéric Girault
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Lok Bijaya Adhikari
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Christian France-Lanord
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Pierre Agrinier
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Bharat P. Koirala
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Mukunda Bhattarai
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Sudhan S. Mahat
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Chiara Groppo
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Franco Rolfo
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Laurent Bollinger
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Frédéric Perrier
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

L.B.A. provided aftershock catalogue and processed Fig. 1. C.F.-L. performed carbon isotopic measurements of the gas phase in the laboratory. P.A. performed carbon isotopic and dissolved inorganic concentration measurements of the water phase in the laboratory. B.P.K. and M.B. participated to field CO₂ flux measurements. S.S.M. participated in the discussions and managed the access to the Sanjen Hydroelectric Project sites. C.G. and F.R. performed water measurements a few weeks before the Gorkha earthquake at four hot springs. L.B. managed the assistance to NSC, seismic data processing, and provided detailed DEM and shared experience. F.G. performed water measurements, CO₂ and radon flux measurements, and collected all samples. F.P. performed radon flux measurements and processed Supplementary Fig. 5. F.G. and F.P. wrote the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frédéric Girault.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary Information

Peer Review File

Description of Additional Supplementary Files

Supplementary Movie 1

Supplementary Movie 2

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Girault, F., Adhikari, L.B., France-Lanord, C. et al. Persistent CO₂ emissions and hydrothermal unrest following the 2015 earthquake in Nepal. Nat Commun 9, 2956 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05138-z

Download citation

Received: 15 October 2017
Accepted: 11 June 2018
Published: 27 July 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05138-z

This article is cited by

Earthquakes control the impulsive nature of crustal helium degassing to the atmosphere
- Antonio Caracausi
- Dario Buttitta
- Tony Alfredo Stabile
Communications Earth & Environment (2022)
CO2 outgassing during collisional orogeny is facilitated by the generation of immiscible fluids
- Chiara Groppo
- Franco Rolfo
- Maria Luce Frezzotti
Communications Earth & Environment (2022)
SAR and optical images correlation illuminates post-seismic landslide motion after the Mw 7.8 Gorkha earthquake (Nepal)
- Pascal Lacroix
- Théo Gavillon
- Flavien Vernier
Scientific Reports (2022)
Radon signature of CO2 flux constrains the depth of degassing: Furnas volcano (Azores, Portugal) versus Syabru-Bensi (Nepal Himalayas)
- Frédéric Girault
- Fátima Viveiros
- Frédéric Perrier
Scientific Reports (2022)
A review framework of how earthquakes trigger volcanic eruptions
- Gilles Seropian
- Ben M. Kennedy
- Arthur D. Jolly
Nature Communications (2021)

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.