Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Composite CYP3A (CYP3A4 and CYP3A5) phenotypes and influence on tacrolimus dose adjusted concentrations in adult heart transplant recipients

Abstract

CYP3A5 genetic variants are associated with tacrolimus metabolism. Controversy remains on whether CYP3A4 increased [*1B (rs2740574), *1ā€‰G (rs2242480)] and decreased function [*22 (rs35599367)] genetic variants provide additional information. This retrospective cohort study aims to address whether tacrolimus dose-adjusted trough concentrations differ between combined CYP3A (CYP3A5 and CYP3A4) phenotype groups. Heart transplanted patients (nā€‰=ā€‰177, between 2008 and 2020) were included and median age was 54 years old. Significant differences between CYP3A phenotype groups in tacrolimus dose-adjusted trough concentrations were found in the early postoperative period and continued to 6 months post-transplant. In CYP3A5 nonexpressers, carriers of CYP3A4*1B or *1ā€‰G variants (Group 3) compared to CYP3A4*1/*1 (Group 2) patients were found to have lower tacrolimus dose-adjusted trough concentrations at 2 months. In addition, significant differences were found among CYP3A phenotype groups in the dose at discharge and time to therapeutic range while time in therapeutic range was not significantly different. A combined CYP3A phenotype interpretation may provide more nuanced genotype-guided TAC dosing in heart transplant recipients.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2: Tacrolimus C0/D from POD 2 to discharge by CYP3A phenotype.
Fig. 3: Analysis of tacrolimus C0/D from POD 2 to discharge by CYP3A4 phenotype.
Fig. 4: Analysis of tacrolimus C0/D from POD 2 to discharge by CYP3A5 phenotype.
Fig. 5: Tacrolimus dose at discharge by CYP3A phenotype.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McCormack PL, Keating GM. Tacrolimus: in heart transplant recipients. Drugs. 2006;66:2269ā€“79. discussion 2280-2282

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  2. Sƶderlund C, RĆ„degran G. Immunosuppressive therapies after heart transplantation-The balance between under- and over-immunosuppression. Transplant Rev (Orlando). 2015;29:181ā€“9.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  3. Adie SK, Bitar A, Konerman MC, Dorsch MP, Andrews CA, Pogue K, et al. Tacrolimus time in therapeutic range and long-term outcomes in heart transplant recipients. Pharmacotherapy. 2022;42:106ā€“11.

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  4. Baker WL, Steiger S, Martin S, Patel N, Radojevic J, Darsaklis K, et al. Association between time-in-therapeutic tacrolimus range and early rejection after heart transplant. Pharmacotherapy. 2019;39:609ā€“13.

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  5. Sirota M, Heyrend C, Ou Z, Masotti S, Griffiths E, Molina K. Impact of tacrolimus variability on pediatric heart transplant outcomes. Pediatr Transplant. 2021;25:e14043.

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  6. Uno T, Wada K, Matsuda S, Terada Y, Oita A, Kawase A, et al. Impact of the CYP3A5*1 allele on the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in japanese heart transplant patients. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2018;43:665ā€“73.

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  7. Deininger KM, Vu A, Page RL, Ambardekar AV, Lindenfeld J, Aquilante CL. CYP3A pharmacogenetics and tacrolimus disposition in adult heart transplant recipients. Clin Transplant. 2016;30:1074ā€“81.

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  8. Gijsen VMGJ, van Schaik RH, Elens L, Soldin OP, Soldin SJ, Koren G, et al. CYP3A4*22 and CYP3A combined genotypes both correlate with tacrolimus disposition in pediatric heart transplant recipients. Pharmacogenomics. 2013;14:1027ā€“36.

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  9. Yu M, Liu M, Zhang W, Ming Y. Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and pharmacogenetics of tacrolimus in kidney transplantation. Curr Drug Metab. 2018;19:513ā€“22.

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  PubMedĀ  PubMed CentralĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  10. Haufroid V, Mourad M, Van Kerckhove V, Wawrzyniak J, De Meyer M, Eddour DC, et al. The effect of CYP3A5 and MDR1 (ABCB1) polymorphisms on cyclosporine and tacrolimus dose requirements and trough blood levels in stable renal transplant patients. Pharmacogenetics. 2004;14:147ā€“54.

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  11. Birdwell KA, Decker B, Barbarino JM, Peterson JF, Stein CM, Sadee W, et al. Clinical pharmacogenetics implementation consortium (CPIC) guidelines for CYP3A5 genotype and tacrolimus dosing. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2015;98:19ā€“24.

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  PubMedĀ  PubMed CentralĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  12. Li J, Liu S, Fu Q, Zhang Y, Wang X, Liu X, et al. Interactive effects of CYP3A4, CYP3A5, MDR1 and NR1I2 polymorphisms on tracrolimus trough concentrations in early postrenal transplant recipients. Pharmacogenomics. 2015;16:1355ā€“65.

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  13. Zuo X, Ng CM, Barrett JS, Luo A, Zhang B, Deng C, et al. Effects of CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 polymorphisms on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in Chinese adult renal transplant recipients: a population pharmacokinetic analysis. Pharmacogenet Genom. 2013;23:251ā€“61.

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  14. Shi W-L, Tang H-L, Zhai S-D. Effects of the CYP3A4*1B genetic polymorphism on the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in adult renal transplant recipients: a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0127995.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  PubMed CentralĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  15. Pallet N, Jannot A-S, El Bahri M, Etienne I, Buchler M, de Ligny BH, et al. Kidney transplant recipients carrying the CYP3A4*22 allelic variant have reduced tacrolimus clearance and often reach supratherapeutic tacrolimus concentrations. Am J Transplant. 2015;15:800ā€“5.

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  16. Bruckmueller H, Werk AN, Renders L, Feldkamp T, Tepel M, Borst C, et al. Which genetic determinants should be considered for tacrolimus dose optimization in kidney transplantation? A combined analysis of genes affecting the CYP3A locus. Ther Drug Monit. 2015;37:288ā€“95.

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  17. Aouam K, Kolsi A, Kerkeni E, Ben Fredj N, Chaabane A, Monastiri K, et al. Influence of combined CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 single-nucleotide polymorphisms on tacrolimus exposure in kidney transplant recipients: a study according to the post-transplant phase. Pharmacogenomics. 2015;16:2045ā€“54.

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  18. Liu M, Shaver CM, Birdwell KA, Heeney SA, Shaffer CM, Van Driest SL. Composite CYP3A phenotypes influence tacrolimus dose-adjusted concentration in lung transplant recipients. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2022;32:209ā€“17.

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  PubMedĀ  PubMed CentralĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  19. DĆ©ri M, SzakĆ”l-TĆ³th Z, Fekete F, MangĆ³ K, Incze E, Minus A, et al. CYP3A-status is associated with blood concentration and dose-requirement of tacrolimus in heart transplant recipients. Sci Rep. 2021;11:21389.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  PubMed CentralĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  20. Bowton E, Field JR, Wang S, Schildcrout JS, Van Driest SL, Delaney JT, et al. Biobanks and electronic medical records: enabling cost-effective research. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6:234cm3.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  PubMed CentralĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  21. Roden DM, Pulley JM, Basford MA, Bernard GR, Clayton EW, Balser JR, et al. Development of a large-scale de-identified DNA biobank to enable personalized medicine. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2008;84:362ā€“9.

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  22. Doligalski CT, Liu EC, Sammons CM, Silverman A, Logan AT. Sublingual administration of tacrolimus: current trends and available evidence. Pharmacotherapy. 2014;34:1209ā€“19.

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  23. Rosendaal FR, Cannegieter SC, van der Meer FJ, BriĆ«t E. A method to determine the optimal intensity of oral anticoagulant therapy. Thromb Haemost. 1993;69:236ā€“9.

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  24. Flockhart DA, Thacker D, McDonald C, Desta Z. The flockhart cytochrome P450 drug-drug interaction table. https://drug-interactions.medicine.iu.edu/MainTable.aspx (accessed May 2022).

  25. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. Drug Development and Drug Interactions | Table of Substrates, Inhibitors and Inducers. FDA. 2022. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-interactions-labeling/drug-development-and-drug-interactions-table-substrates-inhibitors-and-inducers (accessed Mar 2023).

  26. Khwaja A. KDIGO clinical practice guidelines for acute kidney injury. Nephron Clin Pract. 2012;120:c179ā€“184.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  27. Lunde I, Bremer S, Midtvedt K, Mohebi B, Dahl M, Bergan S, et al. The influence of CYP3A, PPARA, and POR genetic variants on the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus and cyclosporine in renal transplant recipients. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2014;70:685ā€“93.

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  PubMedĀ  PubMed CentralĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  28. Luo X, Zhu L, Cai N, Zheng L, Cheng Z. Prediction of tacrolimus metabolism and dosage requirements based on CYP3A4 phenotype and CYP3A5 * 3 genotype in Chinese renal transplant recipients. Acta Pharmacologica Sinica. 2016;37:555ā€“60.

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  PubMedĀ  PubMed CentralĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  29. van Gelder T. Drug interactions with tacrolimus. Drug Saf. 2002;25:707ā€“12.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  30. Undre N, Dickinson J. Relative bioavailability of single doses of prolonged-release tacrolimus administered as a suspension, orally or via a nasogastric tube, compared with intact capsules: a phase 1 study in healthy participants. BMJ Open. 2017;7:e012252.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  PubMed CentralĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

Download references

Funding

Support for this work is provided by funding from Vanderbilt University Medical Centerā€™s BioVU (with data stored in Research Electronic Data Capture), which are supported by institutional funding and by the Clinical and Translational Science Award UL1 TR000445 from the National Institutes of Healthā€™s National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences. ML is supported by Vanderbiltā€™s Maternal and Pediatric Precision in Therapeutics Center of Excellence of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development project grant P50HD106446. SLV was supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences research project grant 1 R01 GM132204.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ML, SH, CLA, KMD, JL, KLS and SLV wrote the manuscript and interpreted results. ML and SLV designed the research study. ML and SD extracted data. ML analyzed data.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michelle Liu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

ML, SH, CLA, JL, KHS and SLV declare no relevant conflicts of interest. KMD was an employee of University of Colorado at the time of this work and is currently an employee of Amgen Pharmaceuticals. SLV was an employee of Vanderbilt University Medical Center at the time of this work and is currently an employee of the National Institutes of Health, Office of the Director, All of Us Research Program.

Additional information

Publisherā€™s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, M., Hernandez, S., Aquilante, C.L. et al. Composite CYP3A (CYP3A4 and CYP3A5) phenotypes and influence on tacrolimus dose adjusted concentrations in adult heart transplant recipients. Pharmacogenomics J 24, 4 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41397-024-00325-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41397-024-00325-2

Search

Quick links