Key Points
-
Meiotic recombination is a major source of genetic diversity in a population.
-
Recent advances in mapping recombination hot spots have shed light on the evolutionary dynamics of recombination hotspot localization and on the factors involved in their specification.
-
The localization of meiotic recombination sites in humans and mice is determined by the DNA-binding specificity of PR domain-containing 9 (PRDM9), which is instrumental in the specification of recombination hot spots. The PRDM9 DNA-binding domain has quickly evolved under positive selection. This evolution may be linked to the erosion of PRDM9-binding sites owing to meiotic DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair..
-
Meiotic DSBs are catalysed by the meiotic recombination protein SPO11 in humans and mice and are regulated by other proteins, which leads to the regulation of recombination.
-
Several factors required for DSB formation are localized on chromosome axes, and this association with chromosome axes regulates meiotic recombination, from the formation of DSBs to their resolution into final recombination products that are formed from either crossover or non-crossover intermediates.
-
In mammals, the proteins RING finger protein 212 (RNF212) and human enhancer of invasion 10 (HEI10) have a key role in promoting DSB repair towards crossovers from a subset of recombination intermediates. These findings provide new insights into the control of crossover frequency.
Abstract
During meiosis, a programmed induction of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) leads to the exchange of genetic material between homologous chromosomes. These exchanges increase genome diversity and are essential for proper chromosome segregation at the first meiotic division. Recent findings have highlighted an unexpected molecular control of the distribution of meiotic DSBs in mammals by a rapidly evolving gene, PR domain-containing 9 (PRDM9), and genome-wide analyses have facilitated the characterization of meiotic DSB sites at unprecedented resolution. In addition, the identification of new players in DSB repair processes has allowed the delineation of recombination pathways that have two major outcomes, crossovers and non-crossovers, which have distinct mechanistic roles and consequences for genome evolution.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$189.00 per year
only $15.75 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Coop, G. & Przeworski, M. An evolutionary view of human recombination. Nature Rev. Genet. 8, 23–34 (2007).
Gerton, J. L. & Hawley, R. S. Homologous chromosome interactions in meiosis: diversity amidst conservation. Nature Rev. Genet. 6, 477–487 (2005).
Baudat, F. & de Massy, B. Regulating double-stranded DNA break repair towards crossover or non-crossover during mammalian meiosis. Chromosome Res. 15, 565–577 (2007).
de Massy, B. Initiation of meiotic recombination: how and where? Annu. Rev. Genet. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genet-110711-155423 (2013).
Bolcun-Filas, E. & Schimenti, J. C. Genetics of meiosis and recombination in mice. Int. Rev. Cell. Mol. Biol. 298, 179–227 (2012).
Borde, V. & de Massy, B. Programmed induction of DNA double strand breaks during meiosis: setting up communication between DNA and the chromosome structure. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 23, 147–155 (2013).
Paigen, K. & Petkov, P. Mammalian recombination hot spots: properties, control and evolution. Nature Rev. Genet. 11, 221–233 (2010).
Arnheim, N., Calabrese, P. & Tiemann-Boege, I. Mammalian meiotic recombination hot spots. Annu. Rev. Genet. 41, 369–399 (2007).
Jeffreys, A. J., Murray, J. & Neumann, R. High-resolution mapping of crossovers in human sperm defines a minisatellite-associated recombination hotspot. Mol. Cell 2, 267–273 (1998).
Auton, A. & McVean, G. Estimating recombination rates from genetic variation in humans. Methods Mol. Biol. 856, 217–237 (2012).
McVean, G. A. et al. The fine-scale structure of recombination rate variation in the human genome. Science 304, 581–584 (2004).
Myers, S., Bottolo, L., Freeman, C., McVean, G. & Donnelly, P. A fine-scale map of recombination rates and hotspots across the human genome. Science 310, 321–324 (2005).
Brunschwig, H. et al. Fine-scale map of recombination rates and hotspots in the mouse genome. Genetics 191, 757–764 (2012).
Brick, K., Smagulova, F., Khil, P., Camerini-Otero, R. D. & Petukhova, G. V. Genetic recombination is directed away from functional genomic elements in mice. Nature 485, 642–645 (2012). Using the powerful detection of hot spots by chromatin immunoprecipitation, this paper shows that the localization of most hot spots depends on PRDM9 and that in the absence of PRDM9, meiotic DSBs occur at H3K4me3-enriched sites.
Smagulova, F. et al. Genome-wide analysis reveals novel molecular features of mouse recombination hotspots. Nature 472, 375–378 (2011).
Baudat, F. et al. PRDM9 is a major determinant of meiotic recombination hotspots in humans and mice. Science 327, 836–840 (2010). This paper establishes the role of PRDM9 by using a mouse genetic approach, by showing the major contribution of PRDM9 in crossover localization in humans and by using analysis of the DNA-binding specificity of PRDM9 in vitro.
Myers, S. et al. Drive against hotspot motifs in primates implicates the PRDM9 gene in meiotic recombination. Science 327, 876–879 (2010). The motif previously identified by these authors in 2008 has a pattern of evolution that is consistent with the motif being actively involved in the initiation of meiotic recombination, and PRDM9 is predicted to recognize this motif.
Parvanov, E. D., Petkov, P. M. & Paigen, K. Prdm9 controls activation of mammalian recombination hotspots. Science 327, 835 (2010).
Hayashi, K., Yoshida, K. & Matsui, Y. A histone H3 methyltransferase controls epigenetic events required for meiotic prophase. Nature 438, 374–378 (2005).
Wu, H. et al. Molecular basis for the regulation of the H3K4 methyltransferase activity of PRDM9. Cell Rep. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2013.08.035 (2013).
Auton, A. et al. A fine-scale chimpanzee genetic map from population sequencing. Science 336, 193–198 (2012).
Buard, J., Barthes, P., Grey, C. & de Massy, B. Distinct histone modifications define initiation and repair of meiotic recombination in the mouse. EMBO J. 28, 2616–2624 (2009).
Grey, C. et al. Mouse PRDM9 DNA-binding specificity determines sites of histone H3 lysine 4 trimethylation for initiation of meiotic recombination. PLoS Biol. 9, e1001176 (2011).
Billings, T. et al. DNA binding specificities of the long zinc finger recombination protein PRDM9. Genome Biol. 14, R35 (2013).
Berg, I. L. et al. PRDM9 variation strongly influences recombination hot-spot activity and meiotic instability in humans. Nature Genet. 42, 859–863 (2010). This study experimentally shows in humans that PRDM9 not only determines hot spots of meiotic recombination but also controls the instability of repeated sequences at the origin of pathological genome rearrangements.
Berg, I. L. et al. Variants of the protein PRDM9 differentially regulate a set of human meiotic recombination hotspots highly active in African populations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 12378–12383 (2011).
Hinch, A. G. et al. The landscape of recombination in African Americans. Nature 476, 170–175 (2011).
Myers, S., Freeman, C., Auton, A., Donnelly, P. & McVean, G. A common sequence motif associated with recombination hot spots and genome instability in humans. Nature Genet. 40, 1124–1129 (2008).
Barski, A. et al. High-resolution profiling of histone methylations in the human genome. Cell 129, 823–837 (2007).
Mikkelsen, T. S. et al. Genome-wide maps of chromatin state in pluripotent and lineage-committed cells. Nature 448, 553–560 (2007).
Lichten, M. & de Massy, B. The impressionistic landscape of meiotic recombination. Cell 147, 267–270 (2011).
Acquaviva, L. et al. The COMPASS subunit Spp1 links histone methylation to initiation of meiotic recombination. Science 339, 215–218 (2013).
Sommermeyer, V., Beneut, C., Chaplais, E., Serrentino, M. E. & Borde, V. Spp1, a member of the Set1 complex, promotes meiotic DSB formation in promoters by tethering histone H3K4 methylation sites to chromosome axes. Mol. Cell 49, 43–54 (2013).
Hayashi, K. & Matsui, Y. Meisetz, a novel histone tri-methyltransferase, regulates meiosis-specific epigenesis. Cell Cycle 5, 615–620 (2006).
Bhattacharyya, T. et al. Mechanistic basis of infertility of mouse intersubspecific hybrids. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, E468–E477 (2013).
Mihola, O., Trachtulec, Z., Vlcek, C., Schimenti, J. C. & Forejt, J. A mouse speciation gene encodes a meiotic histone H3 methyltransferase. Science 323, 373–375 (2009).
Axelsson, E., Webster, M. T., Ratnakumar, A., Ponting, C. P. & Lindblad-Toh, K. Death of PRDM9 coincides with stabilization of the recombination landscape in the dog genome. Genome Res. 22, 51–63 (2012).
Munoz-Fuentes, V., Di Rienzo, A. & Vila, C. Prdm9, a major determinant of meiotic recombination hotspots, is not functional in dogs and their wild relatives, wolves and coyotes. PLoS ONE 6, e25498 (2011).
Oliver, P. L. et al. Accelerated evolution of the Prdm9 speciation gene across diverse metazoan taxa. PLoS Genet. 5, e1000753 (2009).
Shiroishi, T., Koide, T., Yoshino, M., Sagai, T. & Moriwaki, K. Hotspots of homologous recombination in mouse meiosis. Adv. Biophys. 31, 119–132 (1995).
Ptak, S. E. et al. Fine-scale recombination patterns differ between chimpanzees and humans. Nature Genet. 37, 429–434 (2005).
Ptak, S. E. et al. Absence of the TAP2 human recombination hotspot in chimpanzees. PLoS Biol. 2, E155 (2004).
Winckler, W. et al. Comparison of fine-scale recombination rates in humans and chimpanzees. Science 308, 107–111 (2005).
Jeffreys, A. J. & Neumann, R. The rise and fall of a human recombination hot spot. Nature Genet. 41, 625–629 (2009).
Jeffreys, A. J., Neumann, R., Panayi, M., Myers, S. & Donnelly, P. Human recombination hot spots hidden in regions of strong marker association. Nature Genet. 37, 601–606 (2005).
Birtle, Z. & Ponting, C. P. Meisetz and the birth of the KRAB motif. Bioinformatics 22, 2841–2845 (2006).
Ponting, C. P. What are the genomic drivers of the rapid evolution of PRDM9? Trends Genet. 27, 165–171 (2011).
Thomas, J. H., Emerson, R. O. & Shendure, J. Extraordinary molecular evolution in the PRDM9 fertility gene. PLoS ONE 4, e8505 (2009).
Kong, A. et al. Fine-scale recombination rate differences between sexes, populations and individuals. Nature 467, 1099–1103 (2010).
Groeneveld, L. F., Atencia, R., Garriga, R. M. & Vigilant, L. High diversity at PRDM9 in chimpanzees and bonobos. PLoS ONE 7, e39064 (2012).
Steiner, C. C. & Ryder, O. A. Characterization of prdm9 in equids and sterility in mules. PLoS ONE 8, e61746 (2013).
Jeffreys, A. J., Cotton, V. E., Neumann, R. & Lam, K. W. Recombination regulator PRDM9 influences the instability of its own coding sequence in humans. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 600–605 (2013).
Boulton, A., Myers, R. S. & Redfield, R. J. The hotspot conversion paradox and the evolution of meiotic recombination. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 8058–8063 (1997).
Bergerat, A. et al. An atypical topoisomerase II from Archaea with implications for meiotic recombination. Nature 386, 414–417 (1997).
Keeney, S., Giroux, C. N. & Kleckner, N. Meiosis-specific DNA double-strand breaks are catalyzed by Spo11, a member of a widely conserved protein family. Cell 88, 375–384 (1997).
Malik, S. B., Ramesh, M. A., Hulstrand, A. M. & Logsdon, J. M. Jr. Protist homologs of the meiotic Spo11 gene and topoisomerase VI reveal an evolutionary history of gene duplication and lineage-specific loss. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24, 2827–2841 (2007).
Metzler-Guillemain, C. & de Massy, B. Identification and characterization of an SPO11 homolog in the mouse. Chromosoma 109, 133–138 (2000).
Romanienko, P. J. & CameriniOtero, R. D. Cloning, characterization, and localization of mouse and human SPO11. Genomics 61, 156–169 (1999).
Bellani, M. A., Boateng, K. A., McLeod, D. & Camerini-Otero, R. D. The expression profile of the major mouse SPO11 isoforms indicates that SPO11β introduces double strand breaks and suggests that SPO11α has an additional role in prophase in both spermatocytes and oocytes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 30, 4391–4403 (2010).
Kauppi, L. et al. Distinct properties of the XY pseudoautosomal region crucial for male meiosis. Science 331, 916–920 (2011). This study uncovers specific genetic control and structural properties of the PAR region.
Boateng, K. A., Bellani, M. A., Gregoretti, I. V., Pratto, F. & Camerini-Otero, R. D. Homologous pairing preceding SPO11-mediated double-strand breaks in mice. Dev. Cell 24, 196–205 (2013). This is the first study to address how and when homologues interact in mouse meiosis. It uses a detailed immunofluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of homologue distances in meiotic prophase.
Kumar, R., Bourbon, H. M. & de Massy, B. Functional conservation of Mei4 for meiotic DNA double-strand break formation from yeasts to mice. Genes Dev. 24, 1266–1280 (2010).
Libby, B. J., Reinholdt, L. G. & Schimenti, J. C. Positional cloning and characterization of Mei1, a vertebrate-specific gene required for normal meiotic chromosome synapsis in mice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 15706–15711 (2003).
De Muyt, A. et al. AtPRD1 is required for meiotic double strand break formation in Arabidopsis thaliana. EMBO J. 26, 4126–4137 (2007).
Neale, M. J., Pan, J. & Keeney, S. Endonucleolytic processing of covalent protein-linked DNA double-strand breaks. Nature 436, 1053–1057 (2005). This paper identifies a key molecular step in meiotic recombination that has many implications for the mechanism and the regulation of recombination. Moreover, this step is shown to be conserved in S. cerevisiae and Mus musculus.
Lange, J. et al. ATM controls meiotic double-strand-break formation. Nature 479, 237–240 (2011).
Kauppi, L. et al. Numerical constraints and feedback control of double-strand breaks in mouse meiosis. Genes Dev. 27, 873–886 (2013).
Smagulova, F. et al. Suppression of genetic recombination in the pseudoautosomal region and at subtelomeres in mice with a hypomorphic Spo11 allele. BMC Genomics 14, 493 (2013).
Adler, I. D. Comparison of the duration of spermatogenesis between male rodents and humans. Mutat. Res. 352, 169–172 (1996).
Hartshorne, G. M., Lyrakou, S., Hamoda, H., Oloto, E. & Ghafari, F. Oogenesis and cell death in human prenatal ovaries: what are the criteria for oocyte selection? Mol. Hum. Reprod. 15, 805–819 (2009).
Paigen, K. & Petkov, P. Meiotic DSBs and the control of mammalian recombination. Cell Res. 22, 1624–1626 (2012).
Cole, F. et al. Homeostatic control of recombination is implemented progressively in mouse meiosis. Nature Cell Biol. 14, 424–430 (2012).
Cohen, P. E., Pollack, S. E. & Pollard, J. W. Genetic analysis of chromosome pairing, recombination and cell cycle control during first meiotic prophase in mammals. Endocr. Rev. 27, 398–426 (2006).
Hunter, N. in Molecular Genetics of Recombination (eds Aguilera, A. & Rothstein, R.) 381–442 (Springer, 2007).
Mahadevaiah, S. K. et al. Recombinational DNA double-strand breaks in mice precede synapsis. Nature Genet. 27, 271–276 (2001).
Barchi, M. et al. Surveillance of different recombination defects in mouse spermatocytes yields distinct responses despite elimination at an identical developmental stage. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 7203–7215 (2005).
Bellani, M. A., Romanienko, P. J., Cairatti, D. A. & Camerini-Otero, R. D. SPO11 is required for sex-body formation, and Spo11 heterozygosity rescues the prophase arrest of Atm−/− spermatocytes. J. Cell Sci. 118, 3233–3245 (2005).
Jackson, S. P. & Bartek, J. The DNA-damage response in human biology and disease. Nature 461, 1071–1078 (2009).
Kidane, D. et al. DNA polymerase β is critical for mouse meiotic synapsis. EMBO J. 29, 410–423 (2010).
Wei, K. et al. Inactivation of exonuclease 1 in mice results in DNA mismatch repair defects, increased cancer susceptibility, and male and female sterility. Genes Dev. 17, 603–614 (2003).
Hunter, N. Double duty for Exo1 during meiotic recombination. Cell Cycle 10, 2607–2609 (2011).
Barlow, A. L., Benson, F. E., West, S. C. & Hulten, M. A. Distribution of the Rad51 recombinase in human and mouse spermatocytes. EMBO J. 16, 5207–5215 (1997).
Moens, P. B. et al. The time course and chromosomal localization of recombination-related proteins at meiosis in the mouse are compatible with models that can resolve the early DNA–DNA interactions without reciprocal recombination. J. Cell Sci. 115, 1611–1622 (2002). This is a major report of the dynamics and localization of proteins during meiotic prophase. The laboratories of T. Ashley, M. Hulten, C. Heyting and others have also done similar studies.
Sharan, S. K. et al. BRCA2 deficiency in mice leads to meiotic impairment and infertility. Development 131, 131–142 (2004).
Xu, X., Aprelikova, O., Moens, P., Deng, C. X. & Furth, P. A. Impaired meiotic DNA-damage repair and lack of crossing-over during spermatogenesis in BRCA1 full-length isoform deficient mice. Development 130, 2001–2012 (2003).
Chi, P., San Filippo, J., Sehorn, M. G., Petukhova, G. V. & Sung, P. Bipartite stimulatory action of the Hop2–Mnd1 complex on the Rad51 recombinase. Genes Dev. 21, 1747–1757 (2007).
Petukhova, G. V. et al. The Hop2 and Mnd1 proteins act in concert with Rad51 and Dmc1 in meiotic recombination. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 12, 449–453 (2005).
Petukhova, G. V., Romanienko, P. J. & Camerini-Otero, R. D. The Hop2 protein has a direct role in promoting interhomolog interactions during mouse meiosis. Dev. Cell 5, 927–936 (2003).
Cloud, V., Chan, Y. L., Grubb, J., Budke, B. & Bishop, D. K. Rad51 is an accessory factor for Dmc1-mediated joint molecule formation during meiosis. Science 337, 1222–1225 (2012).
Neale, M. J. & Keeney, S. Clarifying the mechanics of DNA strand exchange in meiotic recombination. Nature 442, 153–158 (2006).
Kneitz, B. et al. MutS homolog 4 localization to meiotic chromosomes is required for chromosome pairing during meiosis in male and female mice. Genes Dev. 14, 1085–1097 (2000).
Edelmann, W. et al. Mammalian MutS homologue 5 is required for chromosome pairing in meiosis. Nature Genet. 21, 123–127 (1999).
de Vries, S. S. et al. Mouse MutS-like protein Msh5 is required for proper chromosome synapsis in male and female meiosis. Genes Dev. 13, 523–531 (1999).
Lutzmann, M. et al. MCM8- and MCM9-deficient mice reveal gametogenesis defects and genome instability due to impaired homologous recombination. Mol. Cell 47, 523–534 (2012).
Raynard, S. et al. Functional role of BLAP75 in BLM-topoisomerase IIIα-dependent Holliday junction processing. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 15701–15708 (2008).
Wu, L. et al. BLAP75/RMI1 promotes the BLM-dependent dissolution of homologous recombination intermediates. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 4068–4073 (2006).
Holloway, J. K., Morelli, M. A., Borst, P. L. & Cohen, P. E. Mammalian BLM helicase is critical for integrating multiple pathways of meiotic recombination. J. Cell Biol. 188, 779–789 (2010).
Adelman, C. A. & Petrini, J. H. ZIP4H (TEX11) deficiency in the mouse impairs meiotic double strand break repair and the regulation of crossing over. PLoS Genet. 4, e1000042 (2008).
Yang, F. et al. Meiotic failure in male mice lacking an X-linked factor. Genes Dev. 22, 682–691 (2008).
Guiraldelli, M. F., Eyster, C., Wilkerson, J. L., Dresser, M. E. & Pezza, R. J. Mouse HFM1/Mer3 is required for crossover formation and complete synapsis of homologous chromosomes during meiosis. PLoS Genet. 9, e1003383 (2013).
Reynolds, A. et al. RNF212 is a dosage-sensitive regulator of crossing-over during mammalian meiosis. Nature Genet. 45, 269–278 (2013). The cellular and genetic analyses described in this paper show that RNF212 is essential for the formation of crossovers because it promotes the formation and the stabilization of crossover-specific recombination complexes.
Cheng, C. H. et al. SUMO modifications control assembly of synaptonemal complex and polycomplex in meiosis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 20, 2067–2081 (2006).
Ward, J. O. et al. Mutation in mouse Hei10, an E3 ubiquitin ligase, disrupts meiotic crossing over. PLoS Genet. 3, e139 (2007).
De Los Santos, T. et al. The Mus81/Mms4 endonuclease acts independently of double-Holliday junction resolution to promote a distinct subset of crossovers during meiosis in budding yeast. Genetics 164, 81–94 (2003).
Baker, S. M. et al. Involvement of mouse Mlh1 in DNA mismatch repair and meiotic crossing over. Nature Genet. 13, 336–342 (1996).
Edelmann, W. et al. Meiotic pachytene arrest in MLH1-deficient mice. Cell 85, 1125–1134 (1996).
Lipkin, S. M. et al. Meiotic arrest and aneuploidy in MLH3-deficient mice. Nature Genet. 31, 385–390 (2002).
Holloway, J. K., Booth, J., Edelmann, W., McGowan, C. H. & Cohen, P. E. MUS81 generates a subset of MLH1–MLH3-independent crossovers in mammalian meiosis. PLoS Genet. 4, e1000186 (2008). This study provides evidence for two crossover pathways in mice: a major MLH1–MLH3 dependent pathway, which accounts for 90% of crossovers, and the MUS81-dependent pathway.
Daniel, K. et al. Meiotic homologue alignment and its quality surveillance are controlled by mouse HORMAD1. Nature Cell Biol. 13, 599–610 (2011). This paper shows that HORMAD1, which is a component of the meiotic chromosome axes, has a key role at the interface of synaptonemal complex formation, recombination and progression through meiotic prophase.
Shin, Y. H. et al. Hormad1 mutation disrupts synaptonemal complex formation, recombination, and chromosome segregation in mammalian meiosis. PLoS Genet. 6, e1001190 (2010).
Li, X. C., Bolcun-Filas, E. & Schimenti, J. C. Genetic evidence that synaptonemal complex axial elements govern recombination pathway choice in mice. Genetics 189, 71–82 (2011).
McNicoll, F., Stevense, M. & Jessberger, R. Cohesin in gametogenesis. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 102, 1–34 (2013).
Fraune, J., Schramm, S., Alsheimer, M. & Benavente, R. The mammalian synaptonemal complex: protein components, assembly and role in meiotic recombination. Exp. Cell Res. 318, 1340–1346 (2012).
Kouznetsova, A., Benavente, R., Pastink, A. & Hoog, C. Meiosis in mice without a synaptonemal complex. PLoS ONE 6, e28255 (2011).
Zickler, D. From early homologue recognition to synaptonemal complex formation. Chromosoma 115, 158–174 (2006).
Kogo, H. et al. HORMAD2 is essential for synapsis surveillance during meiotic prophase via the recruitment of ATR activity. Genes Cells 17, 897–912 (2012).
Kogo, H. et al. HORMAD1-dependent checkpoint/surveillance mechanism eliminates asynaptic oocytes. Genes Cells 17, 439–454 (2012).
Wojtasz, L. et al. Meiotic DNA double-strand breaks and chromosome asynapsis in mice are monitored by distinct HORMAD2-independent and -dependent mechanisms. Genes Dev. 26, 958–973 (2012).
Li, X. & Schimenti, J. C. Mouse pachytene checkpoint 2 (Trip13) is required for completing meiotic recombination but not synapsis. PLoS Genet. 3, e130 (2007).
Roig, I. et al. Mouse TRIP13/PCH2 is required for recombination and normal higher-order chromosome structure during meiosis. PLoS Genet. 6, e10010162 (2010).
Perera, D. et al. TopBP1 and ATR colocalization at meiotic chromosomes: role of TopBP1/Cut5 in the meiotic recombination checkpoint. Mol. Biol. Cell 15, 1568–1579 (2004).
Turner, J. M. et al. BRCA1, histone H2AX phosphorylation, and male meiotic sex chromosome inactivation. Curr. Biol. 14, 2135–2142 (2004).
Chowdhury, R., Bois, P. R., Feingold, E., Sherman, S. L. & Cheung, V. G. Genetic analysis of variation in human meiotic recombination. PLoS Genet. 5, e1000648 (2009).
Kong, A. et al. Sequence variants in the RNF212 gene associate with genome-wide recombination rate. Science 319, 1398–1401 (2008). This study analyses high-resolution, sex-specific human genetic maps, which allows the identification of polymorphisms in the RNF212 gene that are associated with variation in genome-wide crossover rate.
Fledel-Alon, A. et al. Variation in human recombination rates and its genetic determinants. PLoS ONE 6, e20321 (2011).
Sandor, C. et al. Genetic variants in REC8, RNF212, and PRDM9 influence male recombination in cattle. PLoS Genet. 8, e1002854 (2012).
Stefansson, H. et al. A common inversion under selection in Europeans. Nature Genet. 37, 129–137 (2005).
Liu, P., Carvalho, C. M., Hastings, P. J. & Lupski, J. R. Mechanisms for recurrent and complex human genomic rearrangements. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 22, 211–220 (2012).
Sasaki, M., Lange, J. & Keeney, S. Genome destabilization by homologous recombination in the germ line. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11, 182–195 (2010).
Nagaoka, S. I., Hassold, T. J. & Hunt, P. A. Human aneuploidy: mechanisms and new insights into an age-old problem. Nature Rev. Genet. 13, 493–504 (2012).
Lam, K. W. & Jeffreys, A. J. Processes of copy-number change in human DNA: the dynamics of α-globin gene deletion. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 8921–8927 (2006).
Lam, K. W. & Jeffreys, A. J. Processes of de novo duplication of human α-globin genes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 10950–10955 (2007).
Hellenthal, G. & Stephens, M. Insights into recombination from population genetic variation. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 16, 565–572 (2006).
Lu, S. et al. Probing meiotic recombination and aneuploidy of single sperm cells by whole-genome sequencing. Science 338, 1627–1630 (2012).
Wang, J., Fan, H. C., Behr, B. & Quake, S. R. Genome-wide single-cell analysis of recombination activity and de novo mutation rates in human sperm. Cell 150, 402–412 (2012).
Kirkness, E. F. et al. Sequencing of isolated sperm cells for direct haplotyping of a human genome. Genome Res. 23, 826–832 (2013).
Billings, T. et al. Patterns of recombination activity on mouse chromosome 11 revealed by high resolution mapping. PLoS ONE 5, e15340 (2010).
Coop, G., Wen, X., Ober, C., Pritchard, J. K. & Przeworski, M. High-resolution mapping of crossovers reveals extensive variation in fine-scale recombination patterns among humans. Science 319, 1395–1398 (2008).
Paigen, K. et al. The recombinational anatomy of a mouse chromosome. PLoS Genet. 4, e1000119 (2008).
Cox, A. et al. A new standard genetic map for the mouse. Genetics 182, 1335–1344 (2009).
Khil, P. P., Smagulova, F., Brick, K. M., Camerini-Otero, R. D. & Petukhova, G. V. Sensitive mapping of recombination hotspots using sequencing-based detection of ssDNA. Genome Res. 22, 957–965 (2012).
Pan, J. et al. A hierarchical combination of factors shapes the genome-wide topography of yeast meiotic recombination initiation. Cell 144, 719–731 (2011).
Fumasoni, I. et al. Family expansion and gene rearrangements contributed to the functional specialization of PRDM genes in vertebrates. BMC Evol. Biol. 7, 187 (2007).
Fog, C. K., Galli, G. G. & Lund, A. H. PRDM proteins: important players in differentiation and disease. Bioessays 34, 50–60 (2012).
Eom, G. H. et al. Histone methyltransferase PRDM8 regulates mouse testis steroidogenesis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 388, 131–136 (2009).
Kim, K. C., Geng, L. & Huang, S. Inactivation of a histone methyltransferase by mutations in human cancers. Cancer Res. 63, 7619–7623 (2003).
Pinheiro, I. et al. Prdm3 and Prdm16 are H3K9me1 methyltransferases required for mammalian heterochromatin integrity. Cell 150, 948–960 (2012).
Briknarova, K., Atwater, D. Z., Glicken, J. M., Maynard, S. J. & Ness, T. E. The PR/SET domain in PRDM4 is preceded by a zinc knuckle. Proteins 79, 2341–2345 (2011).
Schapira, M. Structural chemistry of human, SET domain protein methyltransferases. Curr. Chem. Genom. 5, 85–94 (2011).
Iyengar, S. et al. Functional analysis of KAP1 genomic recruitment. Mol. Cell. Biol. 31, 1833–1847 (2011).
Lim, F. L., Soulez, M., Koczan, D., Thiesen, H. J. & Knight, J. C. A. KRAB-related domain and a novel transcription repression domain in proteins encoded by SSX genes that are disrupted in human sarcomas. Oncogene 17, 2013–2018 (1998).
Smith, H. A. & McNeel, D. G. The SSX family of cancer-testis antigens as target proteins for tumor therapy. Clin. Dev. Immunol. 2010, 150591 (2010).
Ashley, T. et al. Dynamic changes in Rad51 distribution on chromatin during meiosis in male and female vertebrates. Chromosoma 104, 19–28 (1995).
Turner, J. M. Meiotic sex chromosome inactivation. Development 134, 1823–1831 (2007).
Burgoyne, P. S., Mahadevaiah, S. K. & Turner, J. M. The consequences of asynapsis for mammalian meiosis. Nature Rev. Genet. 10, 207–216 (2009).
Royo, H. et al. Evidence that meiotic sex chromosome inactivation is essential for male fertility. Curr. Biol. 20, 2117–2123 (2010).
de la Fuente, R. et al. Meiotic pairing and segregation of achiasmate sex chromosomes in Eutherian mammals: the role of SYCP3 protein. PLoS Genet. 3, e198 (2007).
Maheshwari, S. & Barbash, D. A. The genetics of hybrid incompatibilities. Annu. Rev. Genet. 45, 331–355 (2011).
Dzur-Gejdosova, M., Simecek, P., Gregorova, S., Bhattacharyya, T. & Forejt, J. Dissecting the genetic architecture of F1 hybrid sterility in house mice. Evolution 66, 3321–3335 (2012).
Flachs, P. et al. Interallelic and intergenic incompatibilities of the Prdm9 (Hst1) gene in mouse hybrid sterility. PLoS Genet. 8, e1003044 (2012).
Ding, X. et al. SUN1 is required for telomere attachment to nuclear envelope and gametogenesis in mice. Dev. Cell 12, 863–872 (2007).
Shi, W. et al. Essential developmental, genomic stability, and tumour suppressor functions of the mouse orthologue of hSSB1/NABP2. PLoS Genet. 9, e1003298 (2013).
La Salle, S. et al. Spata22, a novel vertebrate-specific gene, is required for meiotic progress in mouse germ cells. Biol. Reprod. 86, 1–12 (2012).
Liang, Y. et al. BRIT1/MCPH1 is essential for mitotic and meiotic recombination DNA repair and maintaining genomic stability in mice. PLoS Genet. 6, e1000826 (2010).
Guillon, H. & de Massy, B. An initiation site for meiotic crossing-over and gene conversion in the mouse. Nature Genet. 32, 296–299 (2002).
Guillon, H., Baudat, F., Grey, C., Liskay, R.M. & de Massy, B. Crossover and noncrossover pathways in mouse meiosis. Mol. Cell 20, 563–573 (2005).
Acknowledgements
B.d.M. is supported by the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (09-BLAN-0269-01) and the Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale; and Y.I. is supported by a grant from the French Ministry of Research. The authors thank the reviewers for improving the format of this Review and apologize to those whose data could not be cited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Glossary
- Homologous chromosomes
-
The two parental chromosomes that are present in a diploid cell.
- Crossovers
-
Reciprocal recombination events that lead to the re-association of genetic markers located on both sides of the crossover point.
- Non-crossovers
-
Recombination events that are detected as gene conversion events without the exchange of flanking markers.
- Gene conversion
-
Unidirectional transfer of genetic information from a donor to a receiver DNA molecule. During meiotic recombination, this refers to the unidirectional transfer of genetic information from one chromosome to the homologous chromosome.
- DNA double-strand break
-
The event, catalysed by the topoisomerase-like meiotic recombination protein SPO11, that initiates the molecular mechanism of recombination during meiosis.
- Linkage disequilibrium
-
(LD). The preferential association of specific alleles between linked markers.
- Haplotyping
-
The characterization of haplotypes — the combination of linked alleles that are transmitted together to the progeny.
- Congenic
-
Pertainint to the situation in which two strains share the same genetic background in the whole genome except at one locus or chromosomal region.
- Pseudo-autosomal region
-
The region of homology between the sex chromosomes.
- Positive selection
-
The evolution force that favours the increase in frequency of advantageous alleles in a population.
- Minisatellite
-
A tandem nucleotide repeat of a 10–100 bp-long unit. The sequence encoding the PR domain-containing 9 (PRDM9) zinc finger array is a minisatellite of 10–15 repeats of an 84-bp unit.
- Topoisomerase
-
An enzyme involved in regulating DNA topology by catalysing DNA breakage and resealing. The DNA breaks generated are either single stranded for type I topoisomerases or double stranded for type II topoisomerases.
- Bivalent
-
A pair of homologues that are associated by synapsis or chiasmata, which are the cytological manifestation of crossover.
- Sister chromatids
-
Pairs of two chromatids that result from a round of DNA replication.
- Synaptonemal complex
-
The protein structure that stabilizes homologous chromosome axes in meiotic prophase during the process named synapsis.
- Positive crossover interference
-
The mechanism leading to a nonrandom distribution of crossovers, in which the presence of a crossover decreases the probability of additional crossover events occuring nearby.
- Lateral element
-
The proteinaceous structure that defines the chromosome axis at the beginning of meiotic prophase.
- Cohesin
-
A protein that holds sister chromatids together.
- Non-allelic homologous recombination
-
(NAHR). The homologous recombination between identical or quasi-identical sequences that are not allelic. It can lead to chromosomal rearrangements such as deletion, duplication or inversion of sequences and translocations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baudat, F., Imai, Y. & de Massy, B. Meiotic recombination in mammals: localization and regulation. Nat Rev Genet 14, 794–806 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3573
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3573
This article is cited by
-
PRAME induces genomic instability in uveal melanoma
Oncogene (2024)
-
A-MYB and BRDT-dependent RNA Polymerase II pause release orchestrates transcriptional regulation in mammalian meiosis
Nature Communications (2023)
-
The m6A reader PRRC2A is essential for meiosis I completion during spermatogenesis
Nature Communications (2023)
-
DEtail-seq is an ultra-efficient and convenient method for meiotic DNA break profiling in multiple organisms
Science China Life Sciences (2023)
-
The histone modification reader ZCWPW1 promotes double-strand break repair by regulating cross-talk of histone modifications and chromatin accessibility at meiotic hotspots
Genome Biology (2022)