Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Protocol
  • Published:

Engineering complex biological systems in bacteria through recombinase-assisted genome engineering

Abstract

Here we describe an advanced paradigm for the design, construction and stable implementation of complex biological systems in microbial organisms. This engineering strategy was previously applied to the development of an Escherichia coli–based platform, which enabled the use of brown macroalgae as a feedstock for the production of biofuels and renewable chemicals. In this approach, functional genetic modules are first designed in silico and constructed on a bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) by using a recombineering-based inchworm extension technique. Stable integration into the recipient chromosome is then mediated through the use of recombinase-assisted genome engineering (RAGE). The flexibility, simplicity and speed of this method enable a comprehensive optimization of several different parameters, including module configuration, strain background, integration locus, gene copy number and intermodule compatibility. This paradigm therefore has the potential to markedly expedite most strain-engineering endeavors. Once a biological system has been designed and constructed on a BAC, its implementation and optimization in a recipient host can be carried out in as little as 1 week.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Strain-engineering design principle based on the use of RAGE for the optimal implementation of complex biological systems.
Figure 2: Module construction and recombineering into BACs.
Figure 3: Two methods for inchworm extension of BACs through recombineering.
Figure 4: RAGE is a genome engineering strategy that facilitates the stable integration of complex biological systems into the bacterial chromosome by recombinase-mediated cassette exchange.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tabor, J.J. et al. A synthetic genetic edge detection program. Cell 137, 1272–1281 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Nandagopal, N. & Elowitz, M.B. Synthetic biology: integrated gene circuits. Science 333, 1244–1248 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Uchiyama, T. & Miyazaki, K. Functional metagenomics for enzyme discovery: challenges to efficient screening. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 20, 616–622 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gagarinova, A. & Emili, A. Genome-scale genetic manipulation methods for exploring bacterial molecular biology. Mol. BioSystems 8, 1626–1638 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Felnagle, E.A., Chaubey, A., Noey, E.L., Houk, K.N. & Liao, J.C. Engineering synthetic recursive pathways to generate non-natural small molecules. Nat. Chem. Biol. 8, 518–526 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee, J.W. et al. Systems metabolic engineering of microorganisms for natural and non-natural chemicals. Nat. Chem. Biol. 8, 536–546 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Peralta-Yahya, P.P., Zhang, F., del Cardayre, S.B. & Keasling, J.D. Microbial engineering for the production of advanced biofuels. Nature 488, 320–328 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Santos, C.N.S. & Stephanopoulos, G. Combinatorial engineering of microbes for optimizing cellular phenotype. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 12, 168–176 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Henry, C.S., Broadbelt, L.J. & Hatzimanikatis, V. Discovery and analysis of novel metabolic pathways for the biosynthesis of industrial chemicals: 3-hydroxypropanoate. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 106, 462–473 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gibson, D.G. et al. Complete chemical synthesis, assembly, and cloning of a Mycoplasma genitalium genome. Science 319, 1215–1220 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kodumal, S.J. et al. Total synthesis of long DNA sequences: synthesis of a contiguous 32-kb polyketide synthase gene cluster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 15573–15578 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Fu, J. et al. Full-length RecE enhances linear-linear homologous recombination and facilitates direct cloning for bioprospecting. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 440–446 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Quan, J. & Tian, J. Circular polymerase extension cloning of complex gene libraries and pathways. PLoS ONE 4, e6441 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gibson, D.G. et al. Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases. Nat. Methods 6, 343–345 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Li, M.Z. & Elledge, S.J. Harnessing homologous recombination in vitro to generate recombinant DNA via SLIC. Nat. Methods 4, 251–256 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Alper, H., Fischer, C., Nevoigt, E. & Stephanopoulos, G. Tuning genetic control through promoter engineering. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 12678–12683 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Pfleger, B.F., Pitera, D.J., Smolke, C.D. & Keasling, J.D. Combinatorial engineering of intergenic regions in operons tunes expression of multiple genes. Nat. Biotechnol. 24, 1027–1032 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Salis, H.M., Mirsky, E.A. & Voigt, C.A. Automated design of synthetic ribosome binding sites to control protein expression. Nat. Biotechnol. 27, 946–950 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Mutalik, V.K. et al. Precise and reliable gene expression via standard transcription and translation initiation elements. Nat. Methods 10, 354–360 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Birnbaum, S. & Bailey, J.E. Plasmid presence changes the relative levels of many host cell proteins and ribosome components in recombinant Escherichia coli. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 37, 736–745 (1991).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Jones, K.L., Kim, S.W. & Keasling, J.D. Low-copy plasmids can perform as well as or better than high-copy plasmids for metabolic engineering of bacteria. Metab. Eng. 2, 328–338 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tyo, K.E., Ajikumar, P.K. & Stephanopoulos, G. Stabilized gene duplication enables long-term selection-free heterologous pathway expression. Nat. Biotechnol. 27, 760–765 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bentley, W.E. & Quiroga, O.E. Investigation of subpopulation heterogeneity and plasmid stability in recombinant Escherichia coli via a simple segregated model. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 42, 222–234 (1993).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Paulsson, J. & Ehrenberg, M. Noise in a minimal regulatory network: plasmid copy number control. Q. Rev. Biophys. 34, 1–59 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Santos, C.N.S., Regitsky, D.D. & Yoshikuni, Y. Implementation of stable and complex biological systems through recombinase-assisted genome engineering. Nat. Commun. 4, 2503 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Wargacki, A.J. et al. An engineered microbial platform for direct biofuel production from brown macroalgae. Science 335, 308–313 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sharan, S.K., Thomason, L.C., Kuznetsov, S.G. & Court, D.L. Recombineering: a homologous recombination-based method of genetic engineering. Nat. Protoc. 4, 206–223 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang, H.H. et al. Programming cells by multiplex genome engineering and accelerated evolution. Nature 460, 894–898 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Monaco, A.P. & Larin, Z. YACs, BACs, PACs and MACs: artificial chromosomes as research tools. Trends Biotechnol. 12, 280–286 (1994).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Yan, X., Yu, H.J., Hong, Q. & Li, S.P. Cre/lox system and PCR-based genome engineering in Bacillus subtilis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74, 5556–5562 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Yu, B.J. & Kim, C. Minimization of the Escherichia coli genome using the Tn5-targeted Cre/loxP excision system. Methods Mol. Biol. 416, 261–277 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Datsenko, K.A. & Wanner, B.L. One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 6640–6645 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Song, C.W. & Lee, S.Y. Rapid one-step inactivation of single or multiple genes in Escherichia coli. Biotechnol. J. 8, 776–784 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Yu, D., Sawitzke, J.A., Ellis, H. & Court, D.L. Recombineering with overlapping single-stranded DNA oligonucleotides: testing a recombination intermediate. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 7207–7212 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Yu, D. et al. An efficient recombination system for chromosome engineering in Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 5978–5983 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Haldimann, A. & Wanner, B.L. Conditional-replication, integration, excision, and retrieval plasmid-host systems for gene structure-function studies of bacteria. J. Bacteriol. 183, 6384–6393 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Boyd, D., Weiss, D.S., Chen, J.C. & Beckwith, J. Towards single-copy gene expression systems making gene cloning physiologically relevant: λ InCh, a simple Escherichia coli plasmid-chromosome shuttle system. J. Bacteriol. 182, 842–847 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Rodionov, D.A., Gelfand, M.S. & Hugouvieux-Cotte-Pattat, N. Comparative genomics of the KdgR regulon in Erwinia chrysanthemi 3937 and other γ-proteobacteria. Microbiology 150, 3571–3590 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Lee, G. & Saito, I. Role of nucleotide sequences of loxP spacer region in Cre-mediated recombination. Gene 216, 55–65 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Langer, S.J., Ghafoori, A.P., Byrd, M. & Leinwand, L. A genetic screen identifies novel non-compatible loxP sites. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 3067–3077 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Siegel, R.W., Jain, R. & Bradbury, A. Using an in vivo phagemid system to identify non-compatible loxP sequences. FEBS Lett. 499, 147–153 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Glaser, S., Anastassiadis, K. & Stewart, A.F. Current issues in mouse genome engineering. Nat. Genet. 37, 1187–1193 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Louwerse, J.D. et al. Stable recombinase-mediated cassette exchange in Arabidopsis using Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Physiol. 145, 1282–1293 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed equally to the preparation of this manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yasuo Yoshikuni.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Integrated supplementary information

Supplementary Figure 1 Construction of pALG3 plasmid for alginate degradation and metabolism.

1: pALG1 was first constructed by screening a fosmid library of the Vibrio splendidus 12B01 genome. We found several other genetic components that might be responsible for the degradation and metabolism of alginate downstream of the segment found in pALG1 in its genome. 2-4: Two genes downstream of the genomic segment found in pALG1 (V12B01_24254 and V12B01_24259) were cloned in the pKD13-based plasmid. The integration cassette was prepared by PCR (2) and integrated into pALG1 using recombineering techniques (3). The kanamycin selection marker was excised with a FLP recombinase (4) to yield pALG1.1. 5-7: Three other genes downstream of the genomic segment found in pALG1.1 (V12B01_24264, V12B01_24269, and V12B01_24274) were cloned in the pKD13-based plasmid. The integration cassette was prepared by PCR (5) and integrated into pALG1.1 using recombineering techniques (6). The kanamycin selection marker was excised with a FLP recombinase (7) to yield pALG1.2. 8 and 9: Two other genetic components were found downstream of the genomic segment in pALG1.2 (V12B01_24309 and V12B01_24324) and cloned in the pKm-based plasmid. The integration cassette was prepared by PCR (8), and the cassette was integrated into pALG1.2 using recombineering techniques (9) to yield pALG3.

Supplementary Figure 2 Construction of pALG7 plasmid for alginate and cellobiose degradation and metabolism.

1: We found several other genetic components that might be responsible for the degradation and metabolism of alginate downstream of the genomic segment in pALG1 and in the genomes of other microbes such as Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58 and Pseudoalteromonas sp. SM0524. We also found genes that may be responsible for cellobiose degradation and metabolism in Saccharophagus degradans 2-40. These genetic components were integrated into the module. 2-3: Three genetic components were found downstream of the genomic segment in pALG1 (V12B01_24309, V12B01_24324, and V12B01_24269) and cloned in the pKm-based plasmid (pKm_V12B01_24309_24324_24269). The integration cassette was prepared by PCR (2) and integrated into pALG1 using recombineering techniques (3) to yield pALG2. 4-5: An operon comprising genetic components Atu_3019-3026 (suspected to be responsible for alginate metabolism in Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58) was cloned in the pCm-based plasmid (pCm_Atu2019-3026). The integration cassette was prepared using PCR (4) and integrated into pALG2 using recombineering techniques (5) to yield pALG3.0. 6-8: Two genes downstream of the genomic segment found in pALG1 (V12B01_24254 and V12B01_24259) were cloned in the pKD13-based plasmid (pKD_V12B01_24254-24259). The integration cassette was prepared by PCR (6) and integrated into pALG3.0 using recombineering techniques (7). The kanamycin selection marker was excised via FLP recombinase (8) to yield pALG3.5. 9-10: Genetic components that were suspected to be responsible for cellobiose metabolism in Saccharophagus degradans 2-40 were cloned in the pKm-based plasmid (pKm_Sdes). The integration cassette was prepared with PCR (9) and integrated into pALG3.5 using recombineering techniques (10) to yield pALG4.0. 11-12: A gene encoding a bifunctional alginate lyase derived from Pseudoalteromonas sp. SM0524 was engineered to be secretable in E. coli and was cloned in pBeloBAC11-based plasmid (pCm and pBeloBAC11 share the chloramphenicol resistance gene). This integration cassette was prepared by PCR (11) and integrated into pALG4.0 using recombineering techniques (12) to yield pALG7.2. 13-15; three other genes downstream of the genomic segment found in pALG1 (V12B01_24264, V12B01_24269, and V12B01_24274) were cloned in the pKD13-based plasmid (pKD_V12B01_24264-24274). The integration cassette was prepared by PCR (13). This cassette was integrated into pAL7.2 using recombineering techniques (14). The kanamycin selection marker was excised via FLP recombinase (15) to yield pALG7.8.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Figure 1

Construction of pALG3 plasmid for alginate degradation and metabolism. (PDF 341 kb)

Supplementary Figure 2

Construction of pALG7 plasmid for alginate and cellobiose degradation and metabolism. (PDF 363 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Santos, C., Yoshikuni, Y. Engineering complex biological systems in bacteria through recombinase-assisted genome engineering. Nat Protoc 9, 1320–1336 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2014.084

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2014.084

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research