Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Cytogenetics and Molecular Genetics

The Interlaboratory RObustness of Next-generation sequencing (IRON) study: a deep sequencing investigation of TET2, CBL and KRAS mutations by an international consortium involving 10 laboratories

Abstract

Massively parallel pyrosequencing allows sensitive deep sequencing to detect molecular aberrations. Thus far, data are limited on the technical performance in a clinical diagnostic setting. Here, we investigated as an international consortium the robustness, precision and reproducibility of amplicon next-generation deep sequencing across 10 laboratories in eight countries. In a cohort of 18 chronic myelomonocytic leukemia patients, mutational analyses were performed on TET2, a frequently mutated gene in myeloproliferative neoplasms. Additionally, hotspot regions of CBL and KRAS were investigated. The study was executed using GS FLX sequencing instruments and the small volume 454 Life Sciences Titanium emulsion PCR setup. We report a high concordance in mutation detection across all laboratories, including a robust detection of novel variants, which were undetected by standard Sanger sequencing. The sensitivity to detect low-level variants present with as low as 1–2% frequency, compared with the 20% threshold for Sanger-based sequencing is increased. Together with the output of high-quality long reads and fast run time, we demonstrate the utility of deep sequencing in clinical applications. In conclusion, this multicenter analysis demonstrated that amplicon-based deep sequencing is technically feasible, achieves high concordance across multiple laboratories and allows a broad and in-depth molecular characterization of cancer specimens with high diagnostic sensitivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Metzker ML . Sequencing technologies—the next generation. Nat Rev Genet 2010; 11: 31–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Voelkerding KV, Dames S, Durtschi JD . Next generation sequencing for clinical diagnostics-principles and application to targeted resequencing for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a paper from the 2009 William Beaumont Hospital Symposium on Molecular Pathology. J Mol Diagn 2010; 12: 539–551.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Thomas RK, Greulich H, Yuza Y, Lee JC, Tengs T, Feng W et al. Detection of oncogenic mutations in the EGFR gene in lung adenocarcinoma with differential sensitivity to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 2005; 70: 73–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Grossmann V, Kohlmann A, Zenger M, Schindela S, Eder C, Weissmann S et al. A deep-sequencing study of chronic myeloid leukemia patients in blast crisis (BC-CML) detects mutations in 76.9% of cases. Leukemia 2011; 25: 557–560.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Grossmann V, Kohlmann A, Eder C, Haferlach C, Kern W, Cross NC et al. Molecular profiling of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia reveals diverse mutations in >80% of patients with TET2 and EZH2 being of high prognostic relevance. Leukemia 2011; 25: 877–879.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kohlmann A, Grossmann V, Klein HU, Schindela S, Weiss T, Kazak B et al. Next-generation sequencing technology reveals a characteristic pattern of molecular mutations in 72.8% of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia by detecting frequent alterations in TET2, CBL, RAS, and RUNX1. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: 3858–3865.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Smith AE, Mohamedali AM, Kulasekararaj A, Lim Z, Gaken J, Lea NC et al. Next-generation sequencing of the TET2 gene in 355 MDS and CMML patients reveals low-abundance mutant clones with early origins, but indicates no definite prognostic value. Blood 2010; 116: 3923–3932.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bentley G, Higuchi R, Hoglund B, Goodridge D, Sayer D, Trachtenberg EA et al. High-resolution, high-throughput HLA genotyping by next-generation sequencing. Tissue Antigens 2009; 74: 393–403.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Holcomb CL, Hoglund B, Anderson MW, Blake LA, Bohme I, Egholm M et al. A multi-site study using high-resolution HLA genotyping by next generation sequencing. Tissue Antigens 2011; 77: 206–217.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Delhommeau F, Dupont S, Della Valle V, James C, Trannoy S, Masse A et al. Mutation in TET2 in myeloid cancers. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 2289–2301.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bowen DT, Frew ME, Hills R, Gale RE, Wheatley K, Groves MJ et al. RAS mutation in acute myeloid leukemia is associated with distinct cytogenetic subgroups but does not influence outcome in patients younger than 60 years. Blood 2005; 106: 2113–2119.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dunbar AJ, Gondek LP, O’Keefe CL, Makishima H, Rataul MS, Szpurka H et al. 250 K single nucleotide polymorphism array karyotyping identifies acquired uniparental disomy and homozygous mutations, including novel missense substitutions of c-Cbl, in myeloid malignancies. Cancer Res 2008; 68: 10349–10357.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Margulies M, Egholm M, Altman WE, Attiya S, Bader JS, Bemben LA et al. Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors. Nature 2005; 437: 376–380.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Thomas RK, Nickerson E, Simons JF, Janne PA, Tengs T, Yuza Y et al. Sensitive mutation detection in heterogeneous cancer specimens by massively parallel picoliter reactor sequencing. Nat Med 2006; 12: 852–855.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Klein HU, Bartenhagen C, Kohlmann A, Grossmann V, Ruckert C, Haferlach T et al. R453Plus1Toolbox: an R/Bioconductor package for analyzing Roche 454 Sequencing data. Bioinformatics 2011; 27: 1162–1163.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sayers EW, Barrett T, Benson DA, Bolton E, Bryant SH, Canese K et al. Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nucleic Acids Res 2011; 39: D38–D51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Noether GE . Introduction to Statistics: The Nonparametric Way. Springer: New York, 1991.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Wellek S . Testing Statistical Hypotheses of Equivalence. Chapman & Hall/CRC: Boca Raton, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bland JM, Altman DG . Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 1999; 8: 135–160.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Baccarani M, Pane F, Saglio G . Monitoring treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia. Haematologica 2008; 93: 161–169.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ernst T, Erben P, Muller MC, Paschka P, Schenk T, Hoffmann J et al. Dynamics of BCR-ABL mutated clones prior to hematologic or cytogenetic resistance to imatinib. Haematologica 2008; 93: 186–192.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zenz T, Eichhorst B, Busch R, Denzel T, Habe S, Winkler D et al. TP53 mutation and survival in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: 4473–4479.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kohlmann A, Grossmann V, Schindela S, Kern W, Haferlach C, Haferlach T et al. Ultra-deep next-generation sequencing detects RUNX1 mutations with unprecedented sensitivity and allows to monitor minimal residual disease in 116 samples from MDS and AML patients. Blood 2010; 116: 1691a.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Simen BB, Simons JF, Hullsiek KH, Novak RM, Macarthur RD, Baxter JD et al. Low-abundance drug-resistant viral variants in chronically HIV-infected, antiretroviral treatment-naive patients significantly impact treatment outcomes. J Infect Dis 2009; 199: 693–701.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Grossmann V, Schnittger S, Schindela S, Klein HU, Eder C, Dugas M et al. Strategy for robust detection of insertions, deletions, and point mutations in CEBPA, a GC-rich content gene, using 454 next-generation deep-sequencing technology. J Mol Diagn 2011; 13: 129–136.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Study supplies and training courses were provided by Roche Diagnostics GmbH Penzberg, Germany. We would like to thank Verena Lutz, Bruno Frey and Wulf Fischer-Knuppertz for their support throughout the conduct of the study. Research in this work was further supported by the European LeukemiaNet (Work Package 13).

Author Contribution

AK and TH designed the study. SW, SB, TC, HC, EH-B, BG, VG, BH, CG, II, JHJ, GtK, LvdL, GM, KM, MRS, BT, PV and BDY performed research and generated data. H-UK, SW, KH, MD and AK analyzed and interpreted the data. AK, H-UK and SW wrote the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A Kohlmann.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

TH is a part-owner of the MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory GmbH. AK, SW and VG are employed by MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory GmbH. AK has received honoraria from Roche Diagnostics GmbH Mannheim, Germany. Other authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Supplementary Information accompanies the paper on the Leukemia website

Supplementary information

Supplementary Figure 1 (PPT 347 kb)

Supplementary Figure 2 (PPT 2315 kb)

Supplementary Figure 3a (JPG 157 kb)

Supplementary Figure 3b (JPG 160 kb)

Supplementary Figure 4a (JPG 213 kb)

Supplementary Figure 4b (JPG 204 kb)

Supplementary Figure 4c (JPG 207 kb)

Supplementary Figure 4d (JPG 199 kb)

Supplementary Figure 4e (JPG 208 kb)

Supplementary Figure 4f (JPG 210 kb)

Supplementary Figure 4g (JPG 193 kb)

Supplementary Figure 4h (JPG 205 kb)

Supplementary Figure 4i (JPG 208 kb)

Supplementary Figure 4j (JPG 214 kb)

Supplementary Figure 5a (PPT 133 kb)

Supplementary Figure 5b (PPT 216 kb)

Supplementary Figure 6a (JPG 267 kb)

Supplementary Figure 6b (JPG 278 kb)

Supplementary Figure 6c (JPG 272 kb)

Supplementary Figure 6d (JPG 256 kb)

Supplementary Figure 6e (JPG 260 kb)

Supplementary Figure 6f (JPG 260 kb)

Supplementary Figure 6g (JPG 261 kb)

Supplementary Figure 6h (JPG 270 kb)

Supplementary Figure 6i (JPG 258 kb)

Supplementary Figure 7a (JPG 250 kb)

Supplementary Figure 7b (JPG 248 kb)

Supplementary Figure 7c (JPG 247 kb)

Supplementary Figure 7d (JPG 243 kb)

Supplementary Figure 7e (JPG 246 kb)

Supplementary Figure 7f (JPG 243 kb)

Supplementary Figure 7g (JPG 243 kb)

Supplementary Figure 7h (JPG 246 kb)

Supplementary Figure 7i (JPG 249 kb)

Supplementary Figure 7j (JPG 212 kb)

Supplementary Figure 8 (JPG 88 kb)

Supplementary Figure Legends (DOC 29 kb)

Supplementary Tables (DOC 142 kb)

Supplementary Table 4 (XLS 29 kb)

Supplementary Online Data 1 (XLS 120 kb)

Supplementary Online Data 2 (XLS 52 kb)

Supplementary information (DOC 61 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kohlmann, A., Klein, HU., Weissmann, S. et al. The Interlaboratory RObustness of Next-generation sequencing (IRON) study: a deep sequencing investigation of TET2, CBL and KRAS mutations by an international consortium involving 10 laboratories. Leukemia 25, 1840–1848 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2011.155

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2011.155

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links