Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Question for a questionnaire: the International Index of Erectile Function

Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of patient age and education level on the comprehension of the Turkish version of Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), and to determine the patient characteristics that make this questionnaire less reliable. In this study, 238 male patients presenting to our clinic were enrolled. The patients were asked to complete the Turkish version of the IIEF questionnaire upon arrival by themselves and then once again during their second visit with the assistance of a physician. ‘Accurate’ comprehension of the IIEF was considered to be the consistency between the ‘self-administered’ and ‘physician-assisted’ IIEF scores. The impact of patient age and education level on the ‘accurate’ comprehension of the IIEF was analyzed. There was a significant difference between the ‘self-administered’ and ‘physician-assisted’ IIEF scores in patients 60 years of age (P=0.045) and primary school graduates (P=0.015). Age 60 years and being primary school graduate are factors lowering the comprehension of the Turkish version of the IIEF by the patients. Older patients and patients with lower education could benefit from the assistance of a physician while completing this questionnaire.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arrington R, Cofrancesco J, Wu AW . Questionnaires to measure sexual quality of life. Qual Life Res 2004; 13: 1643–1658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Daker-White G . Reliable and valid self-report outcome measures in sexual (dys)function: a systematic review. Arch Sex Behav 2002; 31: 197–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rosen RC, Cappelleri JC, Gendrano III N . The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF): a state-of-the-science review. Int J Impot Res 2002; 14: 226–244.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rosen RC, Riley A, Wagner G, Osterloh IH, Kirkpatrick J, Mishra A . The international index of erectile function (IIEF): a multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology 1997; 49: 822–830.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cappelleri JC, Rosen RC, Smith MD, Mishra A, Osterloh IH . Diagnostic evaluation of the erectile function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function. Urology 1999; 54: 346–351.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Akkus E, Kadioglu A, Esen A, Doran S, Ergen A, Anafarta K et al. Prevalence and correlates of erectile dysfunction in Turkey: a population-based study. Eur Urol 2002; 41: 298–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tokatli Z, Akand M, Yaman O, Gulpinar O, Anafarta K . Comparison of international index of erectile function with nocturnal penile tumescence and rigidity testing in evaluation of erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res 2006; 18: 186–189.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rosen RC, Althof SE, Giuliano F . Research instruments for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with erectile dysfunction. Urology 2006; 68 (Suppl): 6–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Johnson TV, Goodman M, Master VA . The efficacy of written screening tools in an inner city hospital: literacy based limitations on patient access to appropriate care. J Urol 2007; 178: 623–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Serefoglu EC, Atmaca AF, Dogan B, Altinova S, Akbulut Z, Balbay MD . Problems in understanding the Turkish translation of the international index of erectile function. J Androl 2008; 29: 369–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wiltink J, Hauck EW, Phädayanon M, Weidner W, Beutel ME . Validation of the German version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) in patients with erectile dysfunction, Peyronie's disease and controls. Int J Impot Res 2003; 15: 192–197.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Glina S, Mello L, Martins F . International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF): is it an universal tool? Program and Abstracts of the 96th Annual Meeting of the American Urological Assocation; 2–7 June; Anaheim, CA, 2001.

  13. IIEF Validation Group of Turkish Society of Andrology. International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Turkish version, 4th National Sexual Dysfunction Congress Abstract Book 2002, p 43.

  14. MacDiarmid SA, Goodson TC, Holmes TM, Martin PR, Doyle RB . An assessment of the comprehension of the American Urological Association Symptom Index. J Urol 1998; 159: 873–874.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M İ Öztürk.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Öztürk, M., Koca, O., Keleş, M. et al. Question for a questionnaire: the International Index of Erectile Function. Int J Impot Res 23, 24–26 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/ijir.2010.31

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ijir.2010.31

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links