The report by Inoue et al.1 in the present issue of Hypertension Research is important in several respects.
Most importantly, it is the first report demonstrating the significant prognostic impact of the SDPTG-d/a index (the ratio of the height of the d wave to the a wave of the SDPTG), on the basis of long-term follow-up observation of a large general Japanese female population. Using a substantial follow-up totaling 39 732 person-years and including 327 deaths, 79 of which were cardiovascular, the authors successfully established a significant association between the SDPTG-d/a and cardiovascular mortality. This association was clearly independent of BP levels (either SBP or DBP), age and other prognostic factors.
The SDPTG is a pulse wave modality that was devised in the 1970s and has been clinically applied ever since, albeit mainly in Japan. In 1998, Takazawa et al.2 introduced the SDPTG to an international audience, emphasizing its usefulness as an index of vascular aging, as well as its ability to reflect the central augmentation index (cAI) compared with simultaneously recorded direct ascending aortic pressure waveform data. Thus, the present data reported by Inoue et al.1 reinforce the prognostic impact of aortic wave reflections (or augmentation), which are a determinant of central hemodynamics. The paper also strengthens the validity of the SDPTG-d/a as a central blood pressure (CBP)-related index or biosignal carrying central hemodynamic information. However, international clinical and research applications of the SDPTG have been limited, possibly because of a misconception that a peripheral fingertip volume pulse cannot properly convey central hemodynamic information.
For this reason, it would be worthwhile to review how a central aortic pressure wave transmits to the peripheral upper limb and determines the finger artery volume, which can be measured by digital plethysmography (PTG) for SDPTG derivation.
Model-based understanding of pulse wave transduction from the aorta to fingertip PTG
In this context, it is useful to envision the upper limb arteries as a physical system consisting of two components, one corresponding to a conduit (subclavian-radial arteries) and the other to a Windkessel (palm-finger arteries). The output from each component can be calculated from its input multiplied by the system function in the frequency domain,3 that is, the complex ratio of output/input (usually plotted as gain and phase and referred to as a Bode diagram) for each harmonic component as a function of frequency. In the case of the upper limb arteries, the system function of the conduit component is an aorto-radial pressure transfer function that is well known and used as a generalized transfer function (GTF) to estimate CBP with the commercially available SphygmoCor device (AtCor Medical System, Sydney, Australia). Figure 1 shows a ‘Japanized’ GTF (GTF_J) modified for use in Japanese patients on the basis of simultaneous direct aortic pressure and radial tonometric waveform data recorded in 20 cardiac patients.4 The aorto-radial GTF (the conduit system) gain is characterized as a feature of a band-pass filter. It is also similar to a typical frequency response of an underdamped fluid-filled catheter-manometer system, as discussed elsewhere.5 The band-pass feature has a peak (or central) frequency at ~5 Hz, above which input signals expressed as power spectra (defined as squared signal amplitude) become as small as <1/10 000 of the input level at zero frequency (corresponding to the squared MAP). This suggests that the higher-frequency input amplitude of central aortic pressure (PAo) is very small, that is, <1% of the MAP level (Figure 1, lower panel). This feature causes the GTF to function similarly to a high-pass filter, and the resultant output corresponding to the peripheral radial pressure (PRa) waveform is distorted to be early peaked according to the frequency-dependent amplification.
The conduit system output, PRa, is subsequently fed to the palm-finger Windkessel connected to the distal end of the conduit (that is, the radial artery). ‘Windkessel’ refers to a compliant chamber or reservoir whose analog electrical model is a CR (capacitor+resister) circuit that acts as an integrator or low-pass filter. The Windkessel is filled with blood flow depending on the instantaneous pressure gradient at the inlet of the system. The integral of the input blood flow minus the leak flow volume through the resistor determines blood volume in the system, similarly to how a capacitor is charged with an electrical quantity. Therefore, the volume change monitored as the PTG waveform is related to the integrated radial pressure waveform. The measured palm-finger Windkessel system function, that is, the PRa-PTG GTF, was reported by Millasseau et al.6 in 2000. Because those authors might consider the causal direction of the transfer function to be PTG→pressure (PRa) to estimate the PRa waveform from PTG, the resultant GTF shows a band-pass or high-pass feature resembling an aorto-radial GTF. For the normal causal direction described above (pressure→PTG), the transfer function (TF) should be inverted. The TF becomes nearly counter-balanced with the aorto-radial GTF (Figures 2a and b). Hence, it may act as a low-pass filter, permitting at least partial compensation for the pressure wave propagation-induced distortion or amplification. Metaphorically, this TF may act as an inline damper for an underdamped pressure line (the conduit arteries), and thus the total system function (from aorta to fingertip PTG), which is the product of both component system functions, may have nearly all-pass or flat frequency characteristics (Figure 2c). Therefore, PTG not only appears similar to the CBP waveform but also can convey all central hemodynamic information.
Unresolved issues in CBP estimation and CBP-related indexes
The primary purpose of CBP assessment is to obtain hemodynamic information specific to the central aorta, that is, the information that cannot be acquired from brachial cuff BP measurements. Because MAP, the DC (direct current) or static component of BP, is nearly common to central and peripheral BPs, CBP estimation is not necessary to assess MAP.5 All the features specific to CBP are related to the dynamic components of BP modifiable by pressure wave propagation, which are chiefly attributable to wave reflection dynamics.7 In addition, there is a major unresolved issue relating to the inaccuracy of cuff BP measurements, which are essential to calibrate the pressure waveforms to estimate CBP.5 Furthermore, there are also unresolved problems related to the limited generalizability of GTF or the inability to individualize.8, 9 These issues, which have proven difficult to elucidate or resolve for clinicians as well as researchers, may prevent the clinical application of CBP assessment.
Therefore, a reasonable way to avoid these issues is to take advantage of the CBP/augmentation-related indexes, such as the cAI and pulse pressure amplification acquired as peripheral AI (pAI), because these indexes can be assessed without absolute BP values.
Unacknowledged advantages of the SDPTG
Like the cAI and pAI, the SDPTG-d/a is useful as a CBP/augmentation-related index.1, 2 Further, the SDPTG-d/a has several advantages over AIs. As mentioned above, the pressure pulse wave signal transduction acts as a low-pass filter characterized as the aforementioned PRa-PTG GTF (Figure 2b). This phenomenon results in an effective reduction of higher frequency noise or an improved signal-to-noise ratio of PTG, which is advantageous to stably derive a noiseless waveform of the SDPTG. The mathematical differentiation to derive the SDPTG acts as a high-pass (low-cut) filter to effectively eliminate from PTG its offset (static or DC component), which includes no information specific to CBP or central hemodynamics.
Though there is still controversy in regard to the exact mechanism, AIs have been reported to lose their age-dependency after the sixth decade of life, especially in women.10, 11, 12, 13 In contrast, Inoue et al. have shown that the SDPTG-d/a data maintain their age-dependency (Figure 2 in their paper), in agreement with data reported by Takazawa et al.2 and Tabara et al.13 This finding suggests that the SDPTG-d/a may provide additional and more useful information about cardiovascular aging than AIs. In turn, the SDPTG-d/a may provide not only information that has been reported to be equivalent to cAI, an index related to augmentation amplitude, but also information specific to the second derivative, which represents the shape of an augmentation peak of the PTG waveform (reflecting CBP waveform); that is, the SDPTG-d/a can reflect more detailed features of central aortic augmentation.
Finally, the ease and low-cost features of SDPTG may facilitate the routine clinical assessment of central hemodynamics or vascular function.
Given all of the aforementioned reasons, the study by Inoue et al.1 indicates that the time is ripe for reevaluation of the SDPTG as an important biosignal processing modality that can provide information about cardiovascular risk and central hemodynamics.
References
Inoue N, Kawakami H, Yamamoto H, Ito C, Fujiwara S, Sasaki H, Kihara Y . Second derivative of the finger photoplethysmogram and cardiovascular mortality in middle-aged and elderly Japanese women. Hypertens Res 2017; 40: 207–211.
Takazawa K, Tanaka N, Fujita M, Matsuoka O, Saiki T, Aikawa M, Tamura S, Ibukiyama C . Assessment of vasoactive agents and vascular aging by the second derivative of photoplethysmogram waveform. Hypertension 1998; 32: 365–370.
Oppenheim AV, Willsky AS, Nawab SH . in Signals and Systems 2nd edn, Prentice Hall: Houston, TX, USA 2000.
Miyashita H, Kawano T, Hoshino F, Katsuda S, Shimada K . Impact of racial difference compensation in generalized pressure transfer function-based central blood pressure estimation from the radial artery pressure waveform. J Hypertens 2012; 30 (e-Supplement A): e64.
Miyashita H . Clinical assessment of central blood pressure. Curr Hypertens Rev 2012; 8: 80–90.
Millasseau SC, Guigui FG, Kelly RP, Prasad K, Cockcroft JR, Ritter JM, Chowienczyk PJ . Noninvasive assessment of the digital volume pulse. Comparison with the peripheral pressure pulse. Hypertension 2000; 36: 952–956.
Miyashita H, Katsuda S . Basis of monitoring central blood pressure and hemodynamic parameters by peripheral arterial pulse waveform analyses. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2013; 2013: 221–224.
Chen CH, Nevo E, Fetics B, Pak PH, Yin FC, Maughan WL, Kass DA . Estimation of central aortic pressure waveform by mathematical transformation of radial tonometry pressure. Validation of generalized transfer function. Circulation 1997; 95: 1827–1836.
Hope SA, Meredith IT, Tay D, Cameron JD . ‘Generalizability’ of a radial-aortic transfer function for the derivation of central aortic waveform parameters. J Hypertens 2007; 25: 1812–1820.
McEniery CM, Yasmin, Hall IR, Qasem A, Wilkinson IB, Cockcroft JR . Normal vascular aging: differential effects on wave reflection and aortic pulse wave velocity: the Anglo-Cardiff Collaborative Trial (ACCT). J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46: 1753–1760.
O'Rourke MF, Hashimoto J . Mechanical factors in arterial aging: a clinical perspective. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 50: 1–13.
Hickson SS, Nichols WW, Yasmin, McDonnell BJ, Cockcroft JR, Wilkinson IB, McEniery CM . Influence of the central-to-peripheral arterial stiffness gradient on the timing and amplitude of wave reflections. Hypertens Res 2016; 39: 723–729.
Tabara Y, Igase M, Okada Y, Nagai T, Miki T, Ohyagi Y, Matsuda F, Kohara K . Usefulness of the second derivative of the finger photoplethysmogram for assessment of end-organ damage: the J-SHIPP study. Hypertens Res 2016; 39: 552–556.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declare no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Miyashita, H. The time is ripe to reevaluate the second derivative of the digital photoplethysmogram (SDPTG), originating in Japan, as an important tool for cardiovascular risk and central hemodynamic assessment. Hypertens Res 40, 429–431 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/hr.2016.175
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/hr.2016.175