Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Lymphoma

Association of socioeconomic status with autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation outcomes for lymphoma

Abstract

Socioeconomic status (SES) is an important determinant of disparities in health care. The association of SES with outcomes in autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT) has not been described previously. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 687 AHCT recipients with lymphoma transplanted between 2003 and 2013. Patients were categorized into low (<$50 000/year) and high SES ($50 000/year). A greater proportion of low SES patients lived farther away from our center (median 54 vs 28 miles), belonged to a racial minority (12 vs 3%), had poorer performance status (4 vs 1%) and had high-risk disease at AHCT (9 vs 5%). Median follow-up was 53 months. In univariable analysis, low SES patients had significantly higher relapse mortality and lower OS and PFS. This was confirmed on multivariable analysis for relapse mortality (HR for high vs low SES: 0.74 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.54–0.99), P=0.05), OS (HR 0.74 (0.58–0.95), P=0.02) and PFS (HR 0.77 (0.63–0.95), P=0.02). In multivariable analysis of 1-year progression-free survivors, high SES patients had better OS (HR 0.73, P=0.05 vs low SES) that was primarily driven by a trend toward lower risk of non-relapse mortality (HR 0.62, P=0.06). SES is associated with outcomes of AHCT in patients with lymphoma.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Olszewski AJ, Shrestha R, Cook NM . Race-specific features and outcomes of nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma: analysis of the National Cancer Data Base. Cancer 2015; 121: 3472–3480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wolfson JA, Sun CL, Wyatt LP, Hurria A, Bhatia S . Impact of care at comprehensive cancer centers on outcome: Results from a population-based study. Cancer 2015; 121: 3885–3893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Biswas T, Walker P, Podder T, Efird JT . Effect of race and insurance on the outcome of stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Anticancer Res 2015; 35: 4243–4249.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kent EE, Breen N, Lewis DR, de Moor JS, Smith AW, Seibel NL . US trends in survival disparities among adolescents and young adults with non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Cancer Causes Control 2015; 26: 1153–1162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fiala MA, Finney JD, Liu J, Stockerl-Goldstein KE, Tomasson MH, Vij R et al. Socioeconomic status is independently associated with overall survival in patients with multiple myeloma. Leuk Lymphoma 2015; 56: 2643–2649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Shi R, Taylor H, McLarty J, Liu L, Mills G, Burton G . Effects of payer status on breast cancer survival: a retrospective study. BMC Cancer 2015; 15: 211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fedewa SA, Cullati S, Bouchardy C, Welle I, Burton-Jeangros C, Manor O et al. Colorectal cancer screening in Switzerland: cross-sectional trends (2007-2012) in socioeconomic disparities. PLoS ONE 2015; 10: e0131205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chow CJ, Al-Refaie WB, Abraham A, Markin A, Zhong W, Rothenberger DA et al. Does patient rurality predict quality colon cancer care? A population-based study. Dis Colon Rectum 2015; 58: 415–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Markossian TW, O'Neal CM, Senkowski C . Geographic disparities in pancreatic cancer survival in a southeastern safety-net academic medical center. Aust J Rural Health 2016; 24: 73–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hawley ST, Janz NK, Hamilton A, Griggs JJ, Alderman AK, Mujahid M et al. Latina patient perspectives about informed treatment decision making for breast cancer. Patient Educ Couns 2008; 73: 363–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Guo Y, Logan HL, Marks JG, Shenkman EA . The relationships among individual and regional smoking, socioeconomic status, and oral and pharyngeal cancer survival: a mediation analysis. Cancer Med 2015; 4: 1612–1619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Majhail NS, Omondi NA, Denzen E, Murphy EA, Rizzo JD . Access to hematopoietic cell transplantation in the United States. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2010; 16: 1070–1075.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Baker KS, Davies SM, Majhail NS, Hassebroek A, Klein JP, Ballen KK et al. Race and socioeconomic status influence outcomes of unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2009; 15: 1543–1554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Joshua TV, Rizzo JD, Zhang MJ, Hari PN, Kurian S, Pasquini M et al. Access to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: effect of race and sex. Cancer 2010; 116: 3469–3476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Majhail NS, Nayyar S, Santibanez ME, Murphy EA, Denzen EM . Racial disparities in hematopoietic cell transplantation in the United States. Bone Marrow Transplant 2012; 47: 1385–1390.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hari PN, Majhail NS, Zhang MJ, Hassebroek A, Siddiqui F, Ballen K et al. Race and outcomes of autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation for multiple myeloma. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2010; 16: 395–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. American Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation. ASBMT RFI 2015 - Disease Classifications Corresponding to CIBMTR Classification, 2015. Available at https://www.asbmt.org/resource/resmgr/RFI/RFI_2015_-_CIBMTR_Disease_Cl.pdf. Accessed 15 October 2015.

  18. US Census Bureau. American FactFinder, 2010. Accessed 15 October 2015. Available at http://factfinder.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/index.html.

  19. Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation. The poverty guidelines updated periodically in the Federal Register by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services under the authority of 42 USC 9902(2), 2016. Accessed 12 February 2016. Available at https://aspe.hhs.gov/2015-poverty-guidelines.

  20. Bureau of Economic Analysis. US Department of Commerce. ECONOMIC GROWTH WIDESPREAD ACROSS METROPOLITAN AREAS IN 2013. Advance 2014, and Revised 2001–2013 GDP-by-Metropolitan-Area Statistics, 2015. Accessed 23 September 2015. Available at http://bea.gov/newsreleases/regional/gdp_metro/2015/pdf/gdp_metro0915.pdf.

  21. United Sates Census Bureau. QuickFacts, 2015. Accessed 24 February 2016. Available at http://www.census.gov/quickfacts/table/PST045215/00.

  22. Fu S, Rybicki L, Abounader D, Andresen S, Bolwell BJ, Dean R et al. Association of socioeconomic status with long-term outcomes in 1-year survivors of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2015; 50: 1326–1330.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Flowers CR, Nastoupil LJ . Socioeconomic disparities in lymphoma. Blood 2014; 123: 3530–3531.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Han X, Jemal A, Flowers CR, Sineshaw H, Nastoupil LJ, Ward E . Insurance status is related to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma survival. Cancer 2014; 120: 1220–1227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tao L, Foran JM, Clarke CA, Gomez SL, Keegan TH . Socioeconomic disparities in mortality after diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the modern treatment era. Blood 2014; 123: 3553–3562.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Parikh RR, Grossbard ML, Harrison LB, Yahalom J . Impact of delays in definitive treatment on overall survival: a National Cancer Database study of patients with Hodgkin lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma 2015; 15: 1–9; epub ahead of print.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Nikonova A, Guirguis HR, Buckstein R, Cheung MC . Predictors of delay in diagnosis and treatment in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and impact on survival. Br J Haematol 2015; 168: 492–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Majhail NS, Rizzo JD, Lee SJ, Aljurf M, Atsuta Y, Bonfim C et al. Recommended screening and preventive practices for long-term survivors after hematopoietic cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2012; 47: 337–341.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Mitchell JM, Conklin EA . Factors affecting receipt of expensive cancer treatments and mortality: evidence from stem cell transplantation for leukemia and lymphoma. Health Serv Res 2015; 50: 197–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was partly supported by American Society of Hematology HONORS (Hematology Opportunities for the Next Generation of Research Scientists) Award to Sanghee Hong.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N S Majhail.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hong, S., Rybicki, L., Abounader, D. et al. Association of socioeconomic status with autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation outcomes for lymphoma. Bone Marrow Transplant 51, 1191–1196 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2016.107

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2016.107

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links