Main

Osteosarcoma (OS) is the most common primary malignant bone tumour in children and adolescents. Despite significant improvements made over the past several decades in the therapeutic approach of OS, patients with metastases still have a very poor prognosis (less than 20% long-term survival). Osteosarcoma metastasises most commonly to the lungs, and pulmonary metastases are generally thought to be associated with a poor patient outcome (Aljubran et al, 2009).

Of the many factors involved in tumorigenesis, the chemokine/chemokine-receptor system has a critical role in tumour initiation, promotion and progression. Many cancers have a complex chemokine network that influences the immune cells infiltration of a tumour, as well as growth, survival and migration of tumour cells, and angiogenesis (Johrer et al, 2008; O'Hayre et al, 2008).

Many studies have shown that the chemokine CXCL12 and its receptor CXCR4 are critical components in the regulation of tumour spread and metastasis in several types of cancer (O'Hayre et al, 2008). CXCR4 expression was previously shown in OS, but the correlation between CXCR4 level and OS prognosis is still debated (Oda et al, 2006; Lin et al, 2011; Baumhoer et al, 2012). Nevertheless, human and murine OS cell lines have been reported to express CXCR4 and, using animal models of OS, it was demonstrated that the inhibition of this chemokine receptor reduces the tumour progression in the lungs (Perissinotto et al, 2005; Kim et al, 2008).

Besides CXCR4, CXCL12 has been shown to exhibit a high affinity to the receptor CXCR7/RDC-1 (Balabanian et al, 2005; Burns et al, 2006). The expression of CXCR7 has been reported in a variety of tumour cell lines and human tumour samples (Burns et al, 2006; Miao et al, 2007; Meijer et al, 2008; Wang et al, 2008; Calatozzolo et al, 2010; Grymula et al, 2010; Hattermann et al, 2010; Kollmar et al, 2010; Luker et al, 2010; Miekus et al, 2010; Sun et al, 2010; Zheng et al, 2010; Guillemot et al, 2012). Moreover, tumour growth and aggressiveness are often correlated with the alteration of the receptor expression (Bennani-Baiti et al, 2010; D'Alterio et al, 2010; Grymula et al, 2010). A number of these studies have reported the critical role of CXCR7 in tumour vascular formation, angiogenesis and growth promotion of various cancers in vivo (Burns et al, 2006; Miao et al, 2007; Meijer et al, 2008; Wang et al, 2008; Kollmar et al, 2010; Guillemot et al, 2012). However, the role of CXCR7 in OS has not yet been clearly evaluated. The present study was carried out to assess the contribution of CXCR7 receptor in the pulmonary expansion of OS. First, we investigated whether CXCR7 was expressed in OS cells and tissues of human and murine origins. Then, we explored whether the interactions between CXCR7 and its ligands are critical components for OS progression in the lungs. To test this hypothesis, experimental lung tumours of OS as well as specific synthetic CXCR7 ligands were used.

Our results indicate that CXCR7 mainly expressed on tumour-associated vessels can regulate OS progression in the lungs, where are expressed CXCR7 ligands, and thus could have a critical role in the metastatic process of OS.

Materials and methods

Human tissues

Tumour tissues from surgical resection specimens were obtained from the Department of Anatomopathology of Rangueil Hospital (Toulouse, France). All patients gave written informed consent and the study was approved by the hospital’s ethics committee. Ten OSs derived from primary skeletal lesions and 8 cases from lung metastatic lesions (corresponding to lung recurrences in 8 out of 10 patients). Standart histological diagnosis was performed on 5-μm sections of formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissues. The histological diagnosis was reviewed by A.G-B (MD, PhD).

Tumour cell lines

The K7M2 cell line (mouse OS) was obtained from American Type Culture Collection (LGC Promochem, Molsheim, France). The SaOS-LM7 cell line (human OS) was kindly provided by E Kleinerman from Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX, USA). Cell lines were maintained in DMEM (K7M2) and in MEM (SaOS-LM7) as previously described (Pradelli et al, 2009).

Histology/immunohistochemistry

Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections of primary tumour and/or metastatic tissues from patients with OS and from mouse cancer models were stained with haematoxylin and eosin for morphological evaluation. For CXCR7 immunostaining, the tissue sections were subjected for 20 min to heat-mediated antigen retrieval in citrate buffer (pH 6) before blocking in sequential peroxydase and protein block for 20 min. Samples were incubated with anti-CXCR7 antibody clone 11G8 (R&D Systems, Lille, France) for 45 min at 10 μg ml−1 and 20 °C and then, with a secondary HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse antibody.

TaqMan real-time PCR experiments

Total RNA was extracted from mouse healthy lungs using RNeasy kit (Qiagen, Courtaboeuf, France). One microgram of total RNA was reverse-transcribed into cDNA using the Superscript III enzyme (Invitrogen, Cergy Pontoise, France), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Real-Time PCR was performed in an ABI PRISM 7900 using TaqMan gene expression assays (Applied Biosystems, Courtaboeuf, France) with a total of 12.5 ng cDNA as a template for amplification. Cycle parameters were 50 °C for 2 min, 95 °C for 10 min followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for 1 min. Relative mRNA expression levels are presented as ΔCT, which show an inverse correlation with absolute mRNA levels. ΔCT values were obtained by subtracting CT control (mouse 18S, Mm 03928990-g1) from CT target gene (mouse CXCL11 and CXCL12, Mm 00444662m1 and Mm 00445552m1, respectively) measured in the same RNA preparation.

Flow cytometry

K7M2 cells were preincubated with a purified rat anti-mouse CD16/CD32 monoclonal antibody (mouse BD Fc Block; BD Biosciences, Le Pont de Claix, France) and SAOS-LM7 cells, with a purified human IgG (R&D Systems) in order to block non-specific antibody binding. Cells were then stained with a PhycoErythrin-conjugated mouse monoclonal anti-human CXCR7 antibody or with an isotype-matched control antibody (clone 11G8 or IgG1 control, R&D Systems, 0,1 μg of IgG1 per 106 cells) for 30 min at 4 °C. Cells were analysed using a BD FACScanto II flow cytometer.

Animal studies

All of the procedures involving animals and their care were conducted in accordance with institutional guidelines (Permit number A06-088-14) and after approval by the local ethics committee (Permit number NCA 2008-02).

Experimental lung tumours of OS, referring to the late steps of the metastatic process (i.e., extravasation from the blood stream and tumour growth in the lungs) were induced by intravenous injection of K7M2 and SaOS-LM7 cells into 6- to 8-week-old BALB/c and Nude mice (Harlan, Gannat, France), respectively, as previously described (Pradelli et al, 2009). The treatments with synthetic-specific CXCR7 ligands were delivered to mice by intraperitoneal injections of 100 mg kg−1 of the CCX771 compound or its early prototype, the CCX754 compound (Burns et al, 2006; Zabel et al, 2009), according to preventive or curative treatments as described below.

The preventive treatment was performed by treating mice one day before injection of K7M2 cells and for 3 consecutive days (from days −1 to day +3). The curative treatment was achieved by treating animals daily with synthetic CXCR7 ligands from days +5 to day +15 after the injection of K7M2 cells and from days +5 to +15 and again, days +20 to +30 following SaOS-LM7 injection. Fifteen days after the injection of the K7M2 cells or 10 weeks after the injection of the SaOS-LM7 cells, the mice were killed and the lungs were insufflated with 10% neutral-buffered formalin or with India ink dye (Williams and Lisanti, 2004) that reveals white tumour nodules against a black lung background. The extent of tumour development was assessed by recording the number of visible tumour nodules on the pleural surface and by recording the volume of all tumour nodules (cumulative volume).

Statistical analysis

Statistical comparisons were performed using the non-parametric Man–Whitney U-test and statistical significance was set at P<0.05.

Results

CXCR7 expression in human tissues

CXCR7 expression was first analysed in human OS tissues derived from primary skeletal lesions (n=10) and from lung metastatic lesions (n=8) (Figure 1A and B, respectively) by using the CXCR7-specific monoclonal antibody 11G8 (Berahovich et al, 2010b). CXCR7 immunoreactivity was detected in at least 30% of the samples (3 out of 10 primary lesions, 3 out of 8 lung metastases; primary lesion and lung metastases were found together CXCR7-positive for one patient). In both types of lesions, CXCR7-specific reactivity was mostly located on tumour-associated vessels. The number of immunoreactive tumoral vessels within a lesion varied among the sample and ranged from 30 to 50%. Occasionally, CXCR7-specific reactivity was also apparent on tumour cells. In contrast, tumour osteoid, healthy tissues and normal vasculature were not stained by CXCR7 antibodies.

Figure 1
figure 1

Expression of CXCR7 and its ligands in murine and human tissues. (A, B) Immunohistochemical analysis of CXCR7 expression on human biopsies of primary skeletal OS (A) and lung metastatic lesions (B). The filled arrows show CXCR7-stained tumour-associated vessels, whereas the open arrow signals CXCR7-stained OS cells. Magnifications × 400. (C) Flow cytometry investigation of surface CXCR7 expression on K7M2 and SaOS-LM7 cells. Grey histograms represent cells stained with the isotype-matched control antibody. Black histograms show cells stained with an anti-CXCR7 antibody. Panels are representative of two independent experiments. (D) CXCR7 immunostaining of lung sections from SaOS-LM7-bearing mice (upper panel). Spleen sections from nude mouse are used as CXCR7-positive tissue control (lower panel). Positive staining is depicted as brown. Magnification × 200. (E) Quantitative real-time PCR for the analysis of CXCR7 ligands expression in mouse healthy lungs. The relative expression levels of genes were calculated using 18S as a normalising gene and expressed as 1/ΔCT. The mean±s.e.m. of duplicate per condition is shown. Representative of three independent experiments.

It is important to underline that we tested several other CXCR7 antibodies, one rabbit polyclonal (Abcam, PLC, Paris, France) and one mouse monoclonal (R&D) and found discordant stainings (data not shown). Interestingly, Berahovich et al (2010a) highlighted that most CXCR7 antibodies commercially available were not specific, except for CXCR7 11G8 clone, thereby giving concrete explanation to discordant stainings that we observed with the other antibodies.

CXCR7 expression in mouse tumour cells and tissues

The CXCR7 expression was then investigated in lung tumours obtained in mice challenged with K7M2 and SaOS-LM7 OS cells. First, the cell surface CXCR7 expression was examined in vitro on both cell lines by flow cytometry, using the specific 11G8 anti-CXCR7 antibody. The expression of this receptor was undetectable in mouse K7M2 as well as in human SaOS-LM7 (Figure 1C) cells. The in vivo CXCR7 expression was then assessed in the tumour-bearing lungs from SaOS-LM7- and K7M2-inoculated mice. CXCR7 immunoreactivity was detected in all tumoural lung samples. As observed for human OS tissue samples, in SaOS-LM7 mouse lung sections (Figure 1D), CXCR7 immunostaining was mainly located on tumour-associated vessels and in a few cases, on some scarce tumour cells (not shown). In contrast, CXCR7 antibodies did not stain healthy tissues or normal vasculature. The same staining pattern was observed in the K7M2 model (data not shown).

Together, these data underline the relevance of our mouse models for human pathology study.

CXCR7 ligands expression in mouse lungs

Chemokines have a paramount role in the tumour progression through autocrine or paracrine mechanisms. We were thus interested in evaluating the lungs ability of healthy mice to produce the CXCR7 ligands. Quantitative real-time PCR analysis of CXCL11 and CXCL12 gene expression indicated that mouse lungs expressed both chemokines (Figure 1E).

CXCR7-mediated inhibition of lung nodules

We were first interested in evaluating the effects of systemic treatment with synthetic CXCR7 ligands, such as CCX754 and CCX771 compounds (Burns et al, 2006; Zabel et al, 2009), during the early stages of lung tumour formation. To this end, the effects of preventive-called treatment with CCX754, which started before OS cell inoculation and was continued two additional days, was evaluated in the model using K7M2 cells (Figure 2A). As depicted in Figure 2B, mice from both CCX754- and vehicle-treated groups developed numerous macroscopic pulmonary tumour foci. The extent of lung tumour development was significantly reduced by CCX754 treatment. CCX754-treated mice exhibited a 79% reduction in the number of lung nodules compared with vehicle-treated mice (13.3 nodules versus 63.2 nodules, respectively) (Figure 2C, left panel). The inhibitory effect of this treatment was also highlighted by the cumulative tumour volume that presented a 86% reduction in CCX754-treated mice compared with vehicle-treated mice (8.54 mm3 versus 59.2 mm3 respectively) (Figure 2C, right panel). Similar effects were obtained with the CCX771 compound (data not shown) that was used in the following experiments.

Figure 2
figure 2

Effects of CXCR7-targeted treatment in the prevention of OS lung development. (A) Schematic representation of the preventive CXCR7-targeted treatment. K7M2 cells were injected into the tail vein of mice pretreated with vehicle or CCX754 compound, as described in the Materials and Methods section. Fifteen days later, mice were killed for lung examination (n=10–14 mice per group). (B) Representative crude photographs of India ink-stained lungs harvested from vehicle-and CCX754-treated mice. (C) Extent of tumour development by recording the number of pulmonary nodules (left panel) and by measuring the cumulative tumour volume (right panel) in the lungs. Each dot represents the number or the cumulative volume of nodules for one mouse and the middle line represents the median values of each group of mice.

The effects of systemic CCX771 treatment were then evaluated on pre-established OS lung tumours. With this aim, K7M2-inocculated mice were subjected to curative CCX771 treatment or vehicle control (Figure 3A) and examined for tumour development (Figure 3B–D). As shown in Figure 3B, all mice from both groups developed macroscopic pulmonary tumour foci. However, there was a significant metastatic burden reduction in the lungs of CCX771-treated mice compared with the control group, as reflected in the number of foci (54.4 nodules versus 103 nodules, respectively) and in the cumulative tumour volume (36.5 mm3 versus 82.2 mm3, respectively) (Figure 3C). Those data were confirmed by the histological analysis of lungs showing fewer and smaller tumour foci in CCX771-treated mice compared with vehicle-treated mice (Figure 3D).

Figure 3
figure 3

Effects of CXCR7-targeted treatment on pre-established K7M2 lung tumours. (A) Schematic representation of the curative CXCR7-targeted treatment. Mice were injected with K7M2 cells into the tail vein before receiving intraperitoneal injections of CCX771 or vehicle, as described in the Materials and Methods section. Fifteen days after injection of the K7M2 cells, mice were killed for lung examination (n=9–11 mice per group). (B) Representative crude photographs of the lungs of vehicle-treated and CCX771-treated tumour-bearing mice. (C) Extent of tumour development by recording the number of pulmonary nodules (left panel) and by measuring the cumulative tumour volume (right panel) in the lungs. Each dot represents the number or the cumulative volume of nodules for one mouse and the middle line represents the median values of each group of mice. (D) Representative haematoxylin/eosin staining of lungs from vehicle-treated and CCX771-treated tumour-bearing mice. Arrows show metastases. Magnifications × 40.

The effects of systemic treatment with synthetic CXCR7 ligands were next evaluated in human cells using the SaOS-LM7 model. SaOS-LM7-inoculated mice were subjected to curative CCX771 treatment or vehicle (Figure 4A) and the extent of tumour development was assessed as described above. As shown in Figure 4B, all vehicle-treated mice developed lung tumours, whereas only 50% of CCX771-treated mice displayed lung macroscopic nodules. Moreover, CCX771-treated mice exhibited fewer lung nodules than the control group (8.7 nodules versus 21,6 nodules, respectively) (Figure 4C, left panel). This inhibitory effect of CCX771 compound was also reflected in the cumulative tumour volume with a 65% reduction compared with the vehicle-treated group (39.1 mm3 versus 110 mm3, respectively) (Figure 4C, right panel). These data were confirmed by the histological analysis of lungs, showing an almost complete invasion of pulmonary tissues by tumour cells in control group, whereas the tumour burden was limited to some lung tissue areas in the group of CCX771-treated mice (Figure 4D).

Figure 4
figure 4

Effects of CXCR7-targeted treatment on pre-established SaOS-LM7 lung tumours. (A) Schematic representation of the curative CXCR7-targeted treatment. Mice were injected with SaOS-LM7 cells into the tail vein before receiving intraperitoneal injections of CCX771 or vehicle, as described in the Materials and Methods section. Ten weeks after injection of the SaOS-LM7 cells, mice were killed for lung examination (n=14 mice per group). (B) Representative crude photographs of the lungs of vehicle-treated and CCX771-treated tumour-bearing mice. (C) Extent of tumour development by recording the number of pulmonary nodules (left panel) and by measuring the cumulative tumour volume (right panel) in the lungs. Each dot represents the number or the cumulative volume of nodules for one mouse and the middle line represents the median values of each group of mice. (D) Representative haematoxylin/eosin staining of lungs from vehicle-treated and CCX771-treated tumour-bearing mice. Deep purple areas show metastases. Magnifications × 40.

Discussion

This study tested the hypothesis that CXCR7 is critical for the progression of OS in the lungs. Here we show that CXCR7 is expressed in human OS tissues, more specifically in primary bone tumours as well as in lung metastases. We found that this receptor was expressed mainly on tumour-associated blood vessels and rarely on tumour cells and not at all on healthy bone, lungs or vasculature. These results were consistent with studies on other human cancers that had also described CXCR7 expression on the neovasculature associated with tumour and not on most non-transformed cells or on non-tumour vasculature (Miao et al, 2007; Guillemot et al, 2012; Monnier et al, 2012). These data suggested that CXCR7 may have an important role during the development of OS lung metastasis and have thus prompted us to assess their in vivo relevance in OS.

To investigate whether CXCR7 affects OS expansion in the lungs, we tested whether a systemic treatment with specific synthetic CXCR7 ligands could affect local growth of pre-established lung tumours in mice. Indeed, this treatment has been proven to strongly reduce the tumour expansion within the lungs of both SaOS-LM7- and K7M2-inoculated mice. De facto, CXCR7 may be viewed as a key factor in the progression of OS in the lungs. In addition, preventive CXCR7-targeted treatment administrated to mice before the OS cell inoculation significantly reduced tumour formation, also pointing to a role of CXCR7 during the early stages of lung development of OS.

Collectively, these results highlight an essential role of CXCR7 in both the early and the late expansion stages of OS in the lungs and provide the first evidence of the potential of CXCR7-targeted strategies to cure or prevent OS lung expansion.

Despite numerous studies investigating the role of CXCR7 in tumorigenesis of a variety of tumours, the mechanism of action for this receptor remains unclear. Although our study did not allow us to elucidate the molecular mechanisms by which CXCR7 controls OS progression, our data nevertheless suggested possible mechanisms of action.

CXCR7 is a second receptor for CXCL12 that binds this chemokine with greater affinity than CXCR4. Several studies in zebrafish development and in mammalian systems suggest that CXCR7 primarily functions to sequester CXCL12 (Boldajipour et al, 2008; Luker et al, 2010; Naumann et al, 2010). Thus, reducing CXCL12 from its surrounding environment, CXCR7 shapes the extracellular CXCL12 gradient that directs the migration of CXCR4-expressing cells. Computational modelling revealed that CXCL12-producing cells and CXCR7-expressing cells functioned in a source-sink model of gradient formation for CXCR4-dependent chemotaxis (Torisawa et al, 2010). In addition to generating chemotactic gradients, CXCR7 may also maintain CXCL12/CXCR4 signalling by limiting desensitisation of CXCR4 during chronic exposure to CXCL12. As evidenced by our PCR experiments and reported by others (Muller et al, 2001), natural CXCR7 ligands, especially CXCL12, are expressed in healthy lungs. CXCR4 expression has been described on vascular endothelial cells and on their circulating progenitors (Miao et al, 2007; Dai et al, 2011; Monnier et al, 2012; Yan et al, 2012) and several reports have highlighted OS cells as CXCR4-expressing cells (Perissinotto et al, 2005; Kim et al, 2008). As CXCR7 serves as scavenger for CXCL12, it can be suggested that in vivo blockade of CXCR7 might result in enhanced levels of CXCL12. Indeed, it has been reported (Wang et al, 2012) that in vivo CCX754 treatment increase the levels of CXCL12 in peripheral blood. Thus, it can be assumed that increasing amounts of chemokine released in the peripheral blood impedes CXCL12 gradient formation and promotes the desensitisation of CXCR4. Consequently, the migration and/or proliferation of CXCR4+ cells, especially OS cells, endothelial and endothelial-progenitor cells, would be altered and tumour expansion slowed or prevented. Thus, we could explain, as previously shown by Baumhoer et al (2012), that strong expression of CXCL12 is associated with a favourable outcome in OS.

CXCR7 is phylogenetically closely related to chemokine receptors but fails to couple to G proteins and to induce typical chemokine receptor-mediated cellular responses (Fredriksson et al, 2003; Burns et al, 2006; Thelen and Thelen, 2008). Unlike classical chemokine receptors, CXCR7 signals through β-arrestins in response to ligand binding without detectable activation of G proteins. β-Arrestins were initially discovered as negative regulators of G protein-mediated signalling by seven-transmembrane receptors (Lohse et al, 1990), but it was subsequently discovered that they were themselves capable of positively regulating cell signalling. Chemical compounds such as CCX771 and their precursors, originally developped by ChemoCentryx as « CXCR7 inhibitors », have shown agonistic activity in terms of CXCR7-dependent β-arrestin recruitment (Zabel et al, 2009). Consequently, we cannot exclude that the synthetic ligands of CXCR7 impede the OS lung expansion through mechanisms other than the chemokine scavenging one.

In summary, this study shows that CXCR7 has a critical role in OS progression in the lungs, where are expressed CXCR7 ligands, especially CXCL12. Moreover, we highlight that synthetic CXCR7 ligands can represent a powerful therapeutic tool to suppress or prevent lung OS progression.