Articles in 2020

Filter By:

  • Advances in imaging and biomarker discovery have led to a revolution in prostate cancer diagnosis, and nontargeted prostate biopsies should become obsolete. The authors of this Perspective article describe the current diagnostic pathway and discuss how advances in prebiopsy multiparametric MRI and the discovery of novel tumour markers should lead to a new diagnostic pathway.

    • Derek J. Lomas
    • Hashim U. Ahmed
    Perspective
  • TRM cells have a role in peripheral immune surveillance in several organs. The presence of TRM cells in the immune infiltrate is also associated with improved outcomes in patients with several solid tumour types, and these cells might have a role in the response to immune checkpoint inhibitors. In this Review, the authors describe the available date on the role of TRM cells in patients with breast cancer

    • Ann Byrne
    • Peter Savas
    • Sherene Loi
    Review Article
  • Developing novel technologies to discriminate malignant tissue from nonmalignant structures and thereby facilitate safe, complete tumour resection is a major priority for advancing oncological neurosurgery. Herein, we discuss a recently reported innovation involving stimulated Raman spectroscopy of intraoperative tissue samples and data interpretation with artificial intelligence, as well as the implications of this approach for neurosurgical oncology.

    • Michael L. Martini
    • Eric K. Oermann
    News & Views
  • Brain metastases are a frequent manifestation of several common solid tumour types, including lung cancer, breast cancer and melanoma. Although the presence of brain-metastatic disease continues to be associated with poor outcomes, advances in surgery, radiotherapy and systemic therapies that can permeate the blood–brain barrier are beginning to improve patient outcomes. In this Review, the authors provide an overview of contemporary advances in the management of brain metastases over the past decade.

    • John H. Suh
    • Rupesh Kotecha
    • Eric L. Chang
    Review Article
  • Surgery remains a key pillar of cancer therapy, particular for those with curable, localized disease. The immediate perioperative period (days before and after surgery) is associated with various psychological and physiological stresses and associated factors, including inflammatory mediators, that might promote cancer progression and thus determine long-term outcomes. Herein, the authors present the hypothesis and supporting evidence that the use of certain types of immunotherapy, together with interventions to abrogate stress–inflammatory responses, in conjunction with surgery might improve the overall success of cancer treatment.

    • Pini Matzner
    • Elad Sandbank
    • Shamgar Ben-Eliyahu
    Perspective
  • Patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) have historically received chemotherapy, typically with poor survival outcomes. In the past few years, the combination of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with chemotherapy has provided a more effective alternative to chemotherapy alone. Nonetheless, durations of survival are often short, and no robust biomarkers of response are available. In this Review, the authors provide a summary of the efficacy and safety of ICIs in patients with SCLC, and also highlight potential novel immunotherapeutic approaches that are currently in the early stages of investigation.

    • Wade T. Iams
    • Jason Porter
    • Leora Horn
    Review Article
  • In 2018, the SOLO1 trial set a new standard of care with maintenance olaparib substantially extending progression-free survival (PFS) in women with newly-diagnosed BRCA1/2-mutated advanced-stage ovarian cancer. Herein, we summarize trials of first-line poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibition beyond BRCA1/2 mutations, including combination strategies, and discuss the optimum use of PARP inhibition in advanced-stage ovarian cancer.

    • Susana N. Banerjee
    • Christopher J. Lord
    News & Views
  • In 2019, the FDA Oncology Center of Excellence (OCE) approved 11 new drugs and biologic agents, 30 supplemental drug and biologic applications, and four biosimilar applications in oncology. These included two landmark approvals involving collaboration among international regulators as part of OCE Project Orbis, as well as the approval of three novel antibody–drug conjugates.

    • Harpreet Singh
    • Gideon Blumenthal
    • Richard Pazdur
    Comment
  • An immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment is one of the main reasons why patients with solid tumours fail to respond to immune-checkpoint inhibition. In this Perspective, the authors describe the potential of nanomedicines to normalize the tumour microenvironment, thus overcoming this immunosuppressive barrier and enabling greater numbers of patients to respond to immune-checkpoint inhibition.

    • John D. Martin
    • Horacio Cabral
    • Rakesh K. Jain
    Perspective
  • Regulatory approval of new cancer medicines can have important consequence for patients with advanced-stage and/or rare cancers who have exhausted all standard-of-care therapies. However, evidence that new medicines are safe and effective can also take time to accrue, and approval with a lack of evidence may cause unnecessary harm to patients. In this Viewpoint, we asked two leading oncologists involved in clinical drug development, an expert in regulatory science and prescription drug policy, and a prominent patient advocate, to provide their opinions on the current approach to cancer drug approvals.

    • Razelle Kurzrock
    • Hagop M. Kantarjian
    • Ellen V. Sigal
    Viewpoint
  • Dramatic reductions in drug costs in 2020 are unlikely, although early signs suggest that the issue of unsustainable drug pricing is beginning to attract the attentions of policymakers.

    Editorial
  • Liu et al. report data from the largest sequencing analysis of tumour material from patients with metastatic melanoma receiving immune-checkpoint inhibitors. These data confirm the correlations between baseline immune infiltrate and treatment response, but also demonstrate inconsistent associations of tumour mutational burden, specific gene mutations and previously described gene expression patterns with clinical outcomes.

    • Jason J. Luke
    • Paolo A. Ascierto
    News & Views
  • Interval invasive breast cancers diagnosed after a normal mammogram but before the next screening examination have a different tumour biology from that of screen-detected breast cancers, and thus are not detected on mammography. Understanding the genetics and biology of interval invasive cancers could inform better approaches to detection.

    • Yiwey Shieh
    • Elad Ziv
    • Karla Kerlikowske
    News & Views