Abstract
Telomerase is the enzyme involved in extending telomeric DNA. Control of telomerase activity by modulating its access to chromosome ends is one of the most important fundamental mechanisms. This study established an in vitro yeast telomerase reconstitution system that resembles telomere replication in vivo. In this system, a tailed-duplex DNA formed by telomeric DNA was employed to mimic the structure of telomeres. The core catalytic components of telomerase Est2/Tlc1 RNA were used as the telomeric DNA extension machinery. Using the reconstituted systems, this study found that binding of Cdc13 to telomeric DNA inhibited the access of telomerase to its substrate. The result was further confirmed by a single-molecule approach using the tethered-particle motion (TPM)-based telomerase assay. The findings also showed that the inhibitory effect can be relieved by telomerase-associated protein Est1, consistent with the role of Cdc13 and Est1 in regulating telomere extension in vivo. Significantly, this study found that the DNA binding property of Cdc13 was altered by Est1, providing the first mechanistic evidence of Est1 regulating the access of telomerase to its substrate. Thus, the roles of Cdc13 and Est1 in modulating telomerase activity were clearly defined using the in vitro reconstituted system.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Telomeres are the protein-DNA complexes at the termini of eukaryotic chromosomes. They are essential for the preservation and complete replication of chromosomes1. Telomerase is a ribonucleoprotein involved in telomere replication. It contains a catalytic protein component TERT (telomerase reverse transcriptase) and an associated RNA moiety TER, which serves as the template to extend telomeric DNA sequences. In S. cerevisiae, these two components are encoded by EST22,3 and TLC14, respectively. It was shown that Est2 and Tlc1 RNA are sufficient to reconstitute the core telomerase catalytic activity in vitro5. However, in vivo telomerase functions require three other proteins including Est1, Est3 and Cdc13. Mutations in EST2, TLC1, EST1, EST3 and CDC13 cause progressive shortening of telomeres that eventually lead to cell death, suggesting an essential role of these genes in telomere maintenance6,7. Est1 is associated with telomerase through binding to a bulged stem element of Tlc1 RNA8. Cdc13 is a single-stranded telomeric TG1–3 DNA-binding protein that interacts with telomeres9,10. Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments also showed that both Est1 and Cdc13 are enriched at telomeres during the S phase, providing a timely support for its role in telomere length regulation11. The role of Est3 is less clear. It is enriched at telomeres in late S/G2 phase and binds to telomere in an Est1-dependent manner12. Since neither Est1 nor Est3 reveals a significant effect on telomerase activity in vitro, they are taken as regulatory factors for telomerase activity5.
Telomere-associated proteins have been implicated as a fundamental mechanism in regulating telomerase activity13. Indeed, it was shown that both Est1 and Cdc13 are involved in mediating telomerase extension by both genetic and protein fusion experiments11,14,15,16,17,18. The mechanism of how Cdc13-Est1 mediated telomere extension by telomerase has been previously analyzed. Two models were put forward to describe the role of Cdc13 and Est1 in this process. The first model proposes that Est1 forms complex with the Est2/Tlc1 telomerase and then recruits to telomere through interacting with Cdc13 in late S phase of the cell cycle. This model was supported by both two-hybrid and biochemical analyses on the interaction between Cdc13 and Est115, a series of fusion and suppression analyses14,18,19 and detailed chromatin-immunoprecipitation studies20. Live cell imaging of single telomerase particles also provided evidence that telomerase associates with telomeres only in late S phase21. Moreover, addition of newly synthesized telomeres onto double-strand breaks appears to require Cdc13-Est1 interaction to bring telomerase to its site of action18, further supporting the recruiting model. The second model was first put forward after a series of chromatin-immunoprecipitation studies11. It proposed that telomerase complex is in a telomere-associated and inactive state during most stages of the cell cycle. Accumulation of Est1 at late S phase of the cell cycle then activates the activity of telomere-bound telomerase. However, the activation model is not supported by the observation that the Est1-Est2/Tlc1 RNP complex was formed before loading onto telomeres22,23. Currently, there is no biochemical evidence to further support the activation model.
Although genetic analyses have established a role of Cdc13 and Est1 in modulating telomerase activity, the detailed mechanism is not clearly defined. Using telomerases reconstituted from an in vitro translation system and an overexpressing system, Zappulla et al. reported that Cdc13 inhibited telomerase activity24. On the contrary, DeZwaan et al. found that Cdc13 activated telomerase activity and the telomeric DNA binding activity of Cdc13 was not required for the activation25. It was further shown by DeZwaan et al. that Est1 activated telomerase activity and both Cdc13 and Est1 cooperatively achieved a combinatorial activation effect on telomerase26. Although the apparent discrepancy may be explained by the ways telomerase were prepared, how Cdc13 and/or Est1 modulate telomerase is not fully addressed. The detailed mechanistic of telomerase activity modulated by Cdc13 and Est1 remains unclear.
The present study established an in vitro reconstituted system to analyze the mechanism of how Cdc13 and Est1 regulate telomerase activity. Using both biochemical and single-molecule approaches, this study found that binding of Cdc13 to telomeric DNA inhibits telomerase activity. The DNA binding activity of Cdc13 is required for inhibition; hence, the apparent inhibitory effect is most likely caused by blocking the access of telomerase to its substrate. Although Est1 alone does not have a direct effect on telomerase activity, it relieves the telomerase-inhibitory effect of Cdc13. The interaction between Cdc13 and Est1 is important for modulating telomerase activity. Moreover, this study found that Est1 alters the DNA-binding properties of Cdc13. Taken together, the results provide a molecular mechanism on how Est1 relieves the telomerase inhibitory effect of Cdc13. The present findings are consistent with the roles of Cdc13 and Est1 in vivo and clearly define their involvement in regulating telomerase activity.
Results
Establishing an in vitro telomerase analysis system using Est2/Tlc1 RNA complexes and a tailed-duplex DNA
This study chose a yeast strain over-expressing both GST-tagged Est2 and Tlc1 RNA as the initial source of telomerase activity27. The core telomerase activity formed by GST-Est2 and Tlc1 RNA, a ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complex, could then be isolated using glutathione-sepharose resins. As shown in Fig. 1A, both GST-Est2 and Tlc1 RNA were readily detected in the isolated complexes (also in Fig. S1). Cdc13 and Est1 were not detected in the isolated complexes as judged by the immunoblotting experiments using polyclonal antibodies raised against these two proteins (data not shown). The isolated GST-Est2/Tlc1 RNP could utilize yeast single-stranded telomeric DNA T21 as substrate to extend up to seven-nucleotide telomeric sequences (Fig. 1B, left panel). Extension of telomeric DNA by GST-Est2/Tlc1 RNP was sensitive to RNase A digestion, suggesting that the extended products were indeed derived from telomerase activity. Thus, the isolated GST-Est2/Tlc1 RNP had activity consistent with the previous reports of telomerase isolated from the reconstituted enzyme27 or directly from yeast28.
A tailed-duplex DNA substrate was then designed by annealing T21 and C20 oligonucleotides for the analysis of this study (Materials and Methods). The resulting DNA mimics the structure of telomeres. It has a six-base-pair telomeric DNA duplex and a 15-nucleotide single-stranded G-tail on one end. The C20 complementary strand was also designed to have an amino group at the 3′ end to prevent non-specific extensions. As shown in Fig. 1B (right panel), the C20 DNA alone cannot be extended by GST-Est2/Tlc1 RNP. As expected, the tailed-duplex DNA (T21/C20) could be effectively recognized by GST-Est2/Tlc1 RNP as a substrate. It also appeared that the tailed-duplex DNA was a better substrate for Est2/Tlc1 RNP.
As an additional source of telomerase, this study also used yeast cells over-expressing C-terminal TAP (tandem affinity purification)-tagged Est2 (Est2-TAP) and Tlc1 RNA to isolate telomerase complex. Est2-TAP/Tlc1 RNP was then purified by stepwise binding-and-elusions using IgG and calmodulin beads. As shown in Fig. 1C, Est2-TAP was the major protein in the isolated fraction. The isolated Est2-TAP/Tlc1 RNP readily extended telomeric DNA substrates (Fig. 1D, left panel) and appeared to prefer the tailed-duplex DNA as substrate (Fig. 1D, right panel). These findings revealed an in vitro telomerase assay system established successfully using isolated GST-Est2/Tlc1 RNP and Est2-TAP/Tlc1 RNP complexes and a tailed-duplex DNA to mimic telomerase extension in vivo.
Cdc13 inhibits telomerase activity through limiting telomerase accesses to telomeric DNA
To evaluate the effects of telomere-binding protein Cdc13 on telomerase activity, Cdc13 was isolated using a baculovirus system (Fig. 2A)29. In parallel experiments monitoring both DNA-binding and telomerase-inhibition activities of Cdc13 using EMSA and primer extension assays, respectively, Cdc13 was found to bind to both single-stranded telomeric DNA and the tailed-duplex DNA (Fig. 2B). The levels of Cdc13-binding and telomerase-inhibition were well correlated when single-stranded T21 DNA was used as a substrate (Fig. 2B,C). Interestingly, slightly higher telomerase activity was observed at low concentration of Cdc13 on the tailed-duplex T21/C20 DNA, although telomerase activity was inhibited when most of the DNA was bound by Cdc13 (Fig. 2C). The inhibitory effect of Cdc13 was further analyzed using Est2-TAP/Tlc1 RNP. As shown in Fig. 3A, Cdc13 effectively inhibited DNA extension activity of Est2-TAP/Tlc1 RNP, with minimal telomerase activation effect observed at low concentration of Cdc13. Thus, the current biochemical results obtained using two different isolates of telomerases showed that Cdc13 inhibited telomerase activity. The biological implication of Cdc13 activating telomerase at low concentration remains unclear.
Conventional primer extension assay monitors the products of telomerase-mediated telomere extension using the gel electrophoresis technique28. However, owing to the sensitivity of gel assays and the amount of DNA required, the assay detects mostly single-round or double-rounds DNA extension activity by yeast telomerases. A single-molecule telomere extension assay involving tethered particle motion (TPM) has previously been developed for monitoring multiple rounds of telomerase-mediated telomere extension30. This study adopted the TPM-based assay as an independent approach to monitoring the effect of Cdc13 on telomerase.
In the TPM assay, a 5′-digoxigenin labeled tailed-duplex DNA substrate was first incubated with Est2-TAP/Tlc1 RNP to allow extension of telomeric DNA sequences (Fig. 3B). The extended products were immobilized onto the anti-digoxigenin-coated slide surface and were then annealed to polystyrene (PS) beads coated with oligonucleotide probes. These individually tethered DNA-beads underwent Brownian motion (BM), which could be visualized under an optical microscope. BM distributions were then analyzed. A single BM peak at ~15 nm represented DNA products of no or ‘single-round’ extension (Fig. 3B, no extension). Larger BM peaks were observed when the DNA substrates were extended by telomerase (Fig. 3B, +Est2-TAP/Tlc1). Increased population of higher BM peaks as well as more peaks in higher BM indicated that telomerase was capable of extending multiple rounds of reactions on the same DNA substrates. The percentage of high BM peaks disappeared gradually with increase in Cdc13 added (Fig. 3B,C). Thus, the single-molecule telomerase assay demonstrated directly inhibition of telomerase by Cdc13. In view of the results from both biochemical and single-molecule analyses, we concluded that Cdc13 inhibits telomerase in vitro. It is also interesting to note that since the telomerase-inhibitory effects correlated well with the binding of Cdc13 onto DNA substrates, these results also suggested that Cdc13 inhibited telomerase activity through its binding to DNA substrate.
To determine how Cdc13 inhibits telomerase activity, this study examined whether the DNA binding activity of Cdc13 is required for telomerase inhibition. Previous studies had identified two mutants, cdc13R635C and cdc13Y522C, that had lost the telomere-binding activity31. The telomere-binding domain, Cdc13-BD, of wild-type and two mutants were isolated (Fig. S2A). In parallel experiments conducted with both EMSA and primer extension assays, these two mutants failed to bind to telomeric DNA or inhibit telomerase activity (Fig. 4 and S2B). Thus, the results indicated that Cdc13 inhibits telomerase through blocking the access of telomerase to its substrate.
Est1 restores telomerase activity on Cdc13-bound telomeres
Although Est1 is not required for the catalytic activity of telomerase reconstituted in vitro5, it clearly has a role in mediating telomere extension by telomerase in vivo14. The role of Est1 in regulating telomerase activity on Cdc13-bound telomeres was evaluated using the in vitro reconstituted system established in this study. Here Est1 was expressed and isolated from insect cells using the baculovirus expression system (Fig. 5A). The purified Est1 was then tested for its effect on telomerase activity. Est1 was found to be capable of restoring telomerase activity on Cdc13-bound tailed-duplex DNA (Fig. 5B). Up to 30–40% of telomerase activities were restored when Est1 was added to the Cdc13-bound tailed-duplex DNA. Interestingly, Est1 failed to restore telomerase activity when single-stranded telomeric DNA was used as substrate. Thus, the duplex portion within the tailed-duplex DNA might also have a role for Est1 to restore telomerase activity. As an additional proof, Est1 was prepared using TAP-tagged expression and isolation system (Fig. 5C). Similarly, Est1-TAP was found to effectively restore telomerase activity that was inhibited by Cdc13 (Fig. 5D) and Est1-TAP alone did not affect telomerase activity. The status of Est1-TAP binding to DNA substrate and its effect on telomerase activity in the presence or absence of Cdc13 were also evaluated. As shown in Fig. 5E, under the condition that Est1-TAP restored telomerase activity on Cdc13-bound DNA, Est1-TAP alone did not form stable protein-DNA complex with the substrate DNA. Interestingly, Est1-TAP slightly decreased the DNA-binding activity of Cdc13.
Although isolation of recombinant Est1 protein has been reported by several groups25,32,33,34, an issue concerning Est1 protein is its preparation and stability. We had tried to express and isolate recombinant Est1 from E. coli using various constructs. However, none of the constructs enabled successful isolation of Est1. We then applied both baculoviral and yeast expression systems to successfully express Est1 for this study. To prevent protein aggregations, we isolated Est1 using buffers containing 20% glycerol. We also frozen aliquots of the purified Est1 by dry ice/ethanol bath and stored them at −80 °C to minimize the risk of denaturing Est1 protein. Freshly thawed Est1 was used for experiments and was not frozen again to avoid disruption of protein structure by repeated freeze-thawing. Gel filtration column chromatography was also used to analyze if the purified Est1 forms large protein aggregations. Purified Est1-TAP (~82 kDa) eluted from the gel filtration column formed two distinct populations (Fig. S4). One population eluted with the mass ~160 kDa and the other population eluted at ~300–400 kDa. Judged by their sizes, it is likely that Est1 forms both dimer and tetramer in solution. The functional significance of the Est1 dimer-tetramer is not clear to us. Nevertheless, there is no Est1 eluted beyond 440 kDa, suggesting that there is no mis-folded protein aggregates in our Est1 preparations. It is also important to note that the isolated Est1s are capable of restoring the inhibitory effect of Cdc13, indicating that they are functionally competent.
Interaction between Cdc13 and Est1 is required for proper activation of telomerase
Previous studies identified two mutant alleles, cdc13-2 and est1-60, that failed to support telomere extension in vivo9,19. As a result, both alleles showed progressive telomere shortening upon each cell division and eventually led to senescence. The cdc13-2 allele changes the residue Glu252 to Lys whereas the est1-60 allele has a reciprocal amino acid change at residue Lys444. Remarkably, est1-60 was shown to be an allelic specific-mutant that suppressed the telomere defects of cdc13-2. Since telomerase extension function could be restored by reciprocal changes of amino residue, it was concluded that proper interaction between Cdc13 and Est1 is required for telomerase activity19. Thus, these two mutant alleles, cdc13-2 and est1-60, were integrated into the analysis of this study. Both Est1-60 and Cdc13-2 were expressed and isolated using the baculovirus expression system (Fig. 6A). The purified Cdc13-2 bound to telomeric DNA with affinity similar to that of the wild-type protein (Fig. S3), indicating that the DNA-binding activity was not affected by this mutation33. These two mutant proteins were then analyzed for their effects on telomerase activity. Consistent with earlier observation that binding of Cdc13 to telomeric DNA inhibited telomerase, Cdc13-2 also inhibited telomerase activity (Fig. 6B, lane 3). However, the ability to restore telomerase activity in the presence of wild-type Est1 was significantly decreased (Fig. 6B, lanes 8–9). Similarly, the ability to restore telomerase on wild-type Cdc13-bound DNA by Est1-60 was also decreased (Fig. 6B, lanes 6–7). Remarkably, Est1-60 was capable of restoring telomerase activity on Cdc13-2-bound telomeres to a level similar to that by the wild-type proteins (Fig. 6B, lanes 10–11). Thus, the interaction between Cdc13 and Est1 was important for restoring telomerase on Cdc13-bound DNA.
To further support this conclusion, the DNA-binding domain of Cdc13, which does not interact with Est1, was used in the analysis. The DNA-binding domain of Cdc13 was capable of binding to telomeres and inhibiting telomerase activity (Figs 4 and 6C); however, it could not support Est1 to restore telomerase activity (Fig. 6C). Together, these results clearly demonstrated that interaction between Cdc13 and Est1 is crucial for telomerase on Cdc13-bound telomeres.
Alteration of Cdc13 DNA binding property by Est1
The mechanism of how Est1 restores telomerase activity on Cdc13-bound tailed-duplex DNA was further analyzed. Here, dimethyl sulfate (DMS) footprint assay was employed to better determine the Cdc13-telomeric DNA interactions. It enables the analysis of Cdc13-telomeric DNA interaction at single-nucleotide resolution. Cdc13 was first incubated with the tailed-duplex DNA substrate and Est1 was then added to the reactions. The results of Cdc13 footprints following DMS treatments were shown in Fig. 7A. The radioactivities of the footprints were also traced to reveal the differences between various treatments (Fig. 7B). It was apparent that Cdc13 protected a series of G-residues within the single-stranded region (Fig. 7A,B, lane 3). In addition, three G-residues located at the junction between the single-stranded and the duplex DNA were also protected. The results indicated that Cdc13 bound to both single-stranded residues and three G-residues within the double-stranded regions of the tailed-duplex DNA.
Results for DMS footprint experiments also showed that Est1 alone did not alter the pattern of cleavage induced by DMS/piperidine treatment (Fig. 7A, compare lanes 2 and 8). Significantly, addition of Est1 onto Cdc13-bound DNA caused a marked change in Cdc13-footprint. The Cdc13-protected G-residues were exposed to DMS upon the addition of Est1 in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 7B, indicated by arrows). The results indicated that addition of Est1 altered the overall DNA-binding property of Cdc13 and exposed the 3′ end of the DNA. It is also important to note that addition of telomerase into Cdc13-bound DNA did not cause a major change in Cdc13 footprints (Fig. 7, lane 7), indicating that telomerase alone does not alter the telomeric DNA-binding properties of Cdc13. Together, the current findings indicated that the telomeric DNA-binding property of Cdc13 was altered by Est1.
Discussion
Telomerase activity is regulated by Telomere-associated proteins. The current in vitro analyses showed that Cdc13 limits the access of telomerase to its substrate in a telomeric DNA-binding-dependent manner. The results provide the first level of regulating telomerase activity through controlling the accessibility of telomere end. Est1 alone does not affect telomerase activity; it regulates telomerase through the interaction with Cdc1315. This study showed that Est1-Cdc13 interaction is required for telomerase to extend telomere end, supporting the general concept of Cdc13-Est1 interaction in recruiting telomerase onto telomeres14,15,18,19. Moreover, the DMS footprint analyses showed that Est1-Cdc13 interaction changes the DNA binding property of Cdc13 to expose the telomeric end for telomerase extension. The results provide a mechanistic indication that Est1 and Cdc13 might activate telomerase through exposing the telomere end for telomerase. Thus, results from this study are consistent with both recruiting and activation models that, in addition to recruiting telomerase to telomere, Est1-Cdc13 interaction also activates telomerase through change the accessibility of telomere end for telomerase extension. The interaction between Est1 and Cdc13 thus provides the second level of regulating telomerase activity through both recruiting telomerase and exposing the single-stranded telomeric DNA substrate. Through this simple mechanism, the fine-tuning of telomerase activity could be then achieved by other protein factors. For example, Stn1, Ten1 and Est3 could modulate the regulatory effects of Cdc13 and Est1 on telomerase6,35,36. The present in vitro system thus provides an excellent platform to further test directly the role of these proteins in regulating telomerase activity.
The mechanism of how Est1 alters the DNA-binding property of Cdc13 is not clear. Since the Cdc13-protected G-residues were exposed when Est1 was presented in DMS footprint analyses, it is possible that Est1 simply titrating Cdc13 off telomeres. However, judged by the tight binding affinity of Cdc13 to single-stranded telomeric DNA, with a Kd value of ~0.3–0.5 nM37,38, it is not likely that the relatively weak association between Est1 and Cdc13 (the Kd for Est1-Cdc13 is 250 nM33) would titrate away the binding between Cdc13 and telomeric DNA. Because the EMSA analyses from this study showed that Cdc13 remains bound to telomeric DNA with the addition of Est1 and it was reported by Zakian’s group that Est1 could form stable complex with Cdc13-DNA33, it is more likely that Est1 changes the conformation or rearrange the position of Cdc13 on the telomere to expose the telomeric end for telomerase extension.
It is interesting to note that the relieved telomerase activity can only be observed when Est1 is in excess (Figs 5 and 6). The need of using excess amount of Est1 in our analysis could be explained using the concept of fractional occupancy. Here, the fractional occupancy is defined as the fraction of Cdc13 that is bound by Est1. With the dissociation constant between Cdc13 and Est1 as 250 nM33, the calculated fractional occupancy values at 80 and 240 nM Est1 are 20% and 45%, respectively (Fig. S5). These values suggest that only 20% of Cdc13 is bound by Est1 when they are in equal molar ratio (80 nM Cdc13 and 80 nM Est1) and about half of Cdc13 is occupied by Est1 when Est1 is in 3-fold molar excess (80 nM Cdc13 and 240 nM Est1). This study showed that only ~40% of telomerase activity was restored at 240 nM Est1 (Figs 5 and 6). Significantly, these experimental values are in good agreement with the theoretical values. Thus, although Est1 is in excess, only a fraction of Est1 binds to Cdc13 to restore telomerase activity.
This study found that the binding of Cdc13 to telomeric DNA inhibits telomerase activity and the telomere-binding activity of Cdc13 is required for inhibition, which are consistent with a previous report by Zappulla et al.24. The present results and the findings of Zappulla et al. support a general mechanism that binding of a telomere-binding protein inhibited the access of telomerase to telomeres24. The conclusion is different from that reported by DeZwaan et al. that Cdc13 activated telomerase activity26. This study also showed that Est1 was capable of restoring telomerase activity on Cdc13-bound DNA to relieve the inhibitory effect of Cdc13, although Est1 alone did not affect telomerase activity. Again, the current findings are different from results reported by DeZwaan et al. that Est1 protein stimulated telomerase activity25. Although what accounts for the apparent discrepancy remains unclear, it may be due mainly to the ways telomerases were prepared. DeZwaan et al. used telomerase activities partially purified from column fractions of yeast extracts25,26. In reconstitution systems used by Zappulla et al., two telomerase activities were reconstituted. In the first system, the core telomerase enzyme containing Est2 and a short version of Tlc1 RNA was used. These two components were generated by in vitro transcription and translation system using rabbit reticulocyte lysates. Telomerase reconstituted through the in vitro translation system should not contain any yeast protein. The second system was prepared from yeast cells overexpressing Tlc1 RNA and ProA-tagged Est2 protein, similar to a system used in the current analysis. This study also reconstituted telomerase using two versions of Est2, an N-terminal GST-tagged and a C-terminal TAP-tagged, with full-length Tlc1 RNA. These reconstituted telomerases are functional and no Est1 or Cdc13 was detected. Reconstituted telomerases of Zappulla et al. and this study represent the core catalytic enzymatic activity of telomerase. In contrast, telomerase partially purified from yeast might behave as a holo-enzyme with associated proteins co-isolated with it25,26. Indeed, it was noted that Est1 is presented in telomerase preparations of DeZwaan et al.25. These associated proteins might affect telomerase activity that contributes to the apparent differences. It is also possible that the way Cdc13 and Est1 were expressed and isolated caused the differences. While DeZwaan et al. isolated both Cdc13 and Est1 from E. coli26, this study and Zappulla et al.24 expressed and isolated recombinant Cdc13 and Est1 from insect cells using the baculovirus expression system. This study also used a TAP-tagged system to express and isolate Est1 from yeast. Although less likely, this possibility cannot be fully ruled out. Nevertheless, from the perspective of defining the roles of Est1 and Cdc13 in telomerase regulation, the reconstituted system of this study might be advantageous over the partially purified protein in achieving this goal.
Regulation of telomerase activity by controlling the accessibility of telomere end appears to be a common mechanism among different species. In human cells, hPOT1 binds to the single-stranded telomeric DNA and inhibits telomerase from elongating the telomeres39,40. However, telomerase activity is fully restored when a > 6-nt tail is exposed beyond the hPOT1-binding site40. Thus, telomerase accessibility is modulated by positioning hPot1 on the single-stranded tail in human cells. Since telomerase activity was inhibited by Cdc13 on DNA with single-stranded tails ranging from 15–25 nucleotides24, the positioning of Cdc13 on telomeres might not be a major mechanism for regulating telomerase accessibility in yeast. This study found that the interaction between Cdc13 and G-residues on telomeric DNA was reduced by Est1. The reduced telomere-binding activity of Cdc13 might expose the telomere end for telomerase to extend telomere. Thus, the current results support a common mechanism of telomerase regulation by substrate accessibility.
Methods
GST-Est2 and Tlc1 RNA co-overexpression and affinity purification
Yeast strain BJ2168 harboring plasmids pRS424-GAL-TLC1 and pEG(KT)-EST2 was used as the host for telomerase expression27. A single colony was inoculated into the synthetic medium containing 3% raffinose and grown to OD600 = 0.7. Induction of GST-Est2 and Tlc1 RNA expression was achieved by addition of 3% galactose. After induction for 12 hr, yeast cells were harvested by centrifugation and re-suspended in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.4 mM PMSF, 10 mM dithiothreitol and 40 units/ml RNasin). Total cell extracts were prepared by breaking the cells using a cell disruptor followed by centrifugation at 17,500 g. GST-Est2/Tlc1 RNP was then isolated by precipitation using 40% ammonium sulfate and affinity binding using glutathione-sepharose beads (Sigma). The protein complexes were eluted with buffer containing 50 mM Tris/HCl, pH 8.0, 1 mM EDTA, 5% glycerol, 0.01% Triton X-100, 150 mM NaCl, 0.0005% octanol, 20 mM glutathione, 5 mM DTT and 40 units/ml RNasin, divided into aliquots and stored at −70 °C.
Purification of TAP-tagged telomerase
Plasmid pRS426-GAL-EST2-TAP carrying TAP-tagged Est2 was transformed into yeast strain CY123 harboring plasmid pRS424-GAL-TLC1 (from Dr. Jin-Qiu Zhou, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China). The resulting yeast cells were grown in medium containing 2% raffinose at 30 °C until OD600 to 1.0. Galactose was then added to the cells (final concentration 3%) to induce telomerase expression, followed by culture for another 12–16 hr. The TAP-tagged telomerase was purified following protocol described by Puig et al.41. The eluted proteins were divided into aliquots and frozen directly using a dry ice/ethanol bath.
DNA substrates
Oligonucleotides T21 (5′-ATGGCTAGGTAGCCGAATTGCGTAGGTGGGTGTGGTGTGTGTGGG-3′) and C20 (5′CCCACCTACGCAATTCGGCTACCTAGCCAT-NH2-3′) were used in this study. To prepare the tailed-duplex DNA substrates, T21 DNA was mixed with excess amount of unlabeled C20 DNA and incubated at 100 °C for 5 min. DNA mixtures were then slowly cooled at room temperature and subsequently separated by a native 8% polyacrylamide gel to isolate the tailed-duplex DNA substrate.
Primer extension assay
Telomerase reactions were carried out in 30 μl of reaction buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 1 mM DTT, 1 mM spermidine, 2 mM Mg-acetate and 50 μM dTTP) with 30 nM DNA substrate and 10 μCi [α-32P]dGTP at 30 °C for 1 hr. The reactions were stopped by addition of 80 μl of extension-stopping solution (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 20 mM EDTA and 0.1 mg/ml RNase A) at 30 °C for 10 min, followed by addition of 100 μl of SDS/PK solution (10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 0.5% SDS and 0.3 mg/ml proteinase K) at 37 °C for 30 min. The reaction products were extracted by phenol/chloroform and then precipitated with 7.5M NH4OAc and 2.5 volumes cold 100% ethanol. The reaction products were then separated by a 12% sequencing gel and then visualized using a PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics). To quantify telomerase activity, the total intensity of all major bands (+1 to +7) was measured for each reaction (ImageQuant). Quantifications were obtained from the average of three-six independent experiments. The mean values of the results are plotted and the standard deviations are plotted as error bars.
Tethered-Particle Motion (TPM)-based in vitro telomerase activity assay
The single-molecule telomerase assay was conducted by following a protocol that was developed by Li et al.30. Briefly, a tailed duplex DNA substrate formed by digoxigenin-labeled 5′-ATTCCTTGCGGCGGCGGTGCTCAACGGCCTCAACCTACTACTGGGCTGCTTCCTAATGCAGGAGTCGCATAAGGGAGAGCGTCGACCGATGGTGTGTGTGGG-3′ and 5′-ATCGGTCGACGCTCTCCCTTATGCGACTGGTGCATTAGGAAGCAGCCCAGTAGTAGGTTGAGGCCGTTGAGCACCGCCGCCGCAAGGAAT-3′ (1 nM) was first incubated at 30 °C overnight with 4 nM of purified telomerase in the presence or absence of Cdc13. The extension reactions were stopped by introducing RNase H and Proteinase K (NEB) at 30 °C for 20 min followed by heating at 80 °C to disrupt telomerase-DNA interaction. The reaction products were then loaded onto anti-digoxigenin (20 ng/μL)-coated slides. To visualize the extent of telomerase-mediated telomere lengthening, immobilized reaction products were incubated with 5′ biotinylated oligonucleotide probe (5′-CCCACACACACC-3′, 5 μM) for 20 min. Streptavidin-coated polystyrene beads were then introduced into the reaction chamber for tether visualization. The sequence of oligonucleotide probe is complementary to the telomerase-extended DNA; hence, the oligonucleotide probe could be annealed to several different positions in the case of multiple runs of telomere extension. Single-molecule tethering events were next observed under an inverted microscope (Olympus IX-71) with differential interference contrast (DIC) image method. The imaging acquisition was at 30 Hz. The Brownian motion amplitude (BM) was defined as the standard deviation of the centroid position of the tethers with an average of 40 frames and the BM values were drift-corrected using a stuck bead pre-adsorbed on the surface. Quantifications were obtained from the average of three independent experiments.
Expression and purification of 6xHis-tagged Cdc13, Est1 and Cdc13(451-693)
The baculovirus system was utilized to purify Cdc13 and Est129. Insect cell line sf21 was used as the host for virus propagation and protein purification. E. coli BL21(DE3) pLysS was used as the host for Cdc13(451–693) purification29. A TAP-tagged Est1 was also isolated following the protocol described by Puig et al.41
Electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA)
Oligonucleotides was first 5′ end labeled with γ-32P-ATP (3000 mCi/mM, NEN) using T4 polynucleotide kinase (New England Biolabs) and subsequently purified from a 10% sequencing gel after electrophoresis. To prepare the tailed-duplex DNA substrates, the 5′ end-labeled T21 DNA was mixed with excess amount of unlabeled C20 DNA to form the tailed-duplex DNA substrate described earlier. EMSA experiments were conducted on 6% non-denaturing polyacrylamide gels. To quantify DNA-binding activity, the fraction of free probe was measured for each reaction (ImageQuant). The values were obtained from three independent experiments. The mean values of the results are plotted and the standard deviations are plotted as error bars.
Dimethyl Sulfate Footprint
Radiolabeled DNA was mixed with Cdc13 and/or Est1 in 50 mM cacodylate buffer, pH 7.0 and incubated at 25 °C for 10 min. Dimethyl sulfate (DMS) was added to a final concentration of 0.05% and incubated at 22 °C for another 15 min. The mixtures were ethanol-precipitated, resuspended in 50 μl of 10% piperidine, incubated at 95 °C for 15 min and separated by 10% denaturing gels. The gels were dried and analyzed with a PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics). To quantify the footprints, each lane was divided into 400 sections. The radioactivity was measured using ImageQuant and the relative radioactivity levels were then plotted.
Additional Information
How to cite this article: Chen, Y.-F. et al. Modulation of yeast telomerase activity by Cdc13 and Est1 in vitro. Sci. Rep. 6, 34104; doi: 10.1038/srep34104 (2016).
References
Wellinger, R. J. & Zakian, V. A. Everything you ever wanted to know about Saccharomyces cerevisiae telomeres: Beginning to end. Genetics 191, 1073–1105 (2012).
Counter, C. M., Meyerson, M., Eaton, E. N. & Weinberg, R. A. The catalytic subunit of yeast telomerase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 9202–9207 (1997).
Lingner, J. et al. Reverse transcriptase motifs on the catalytic subunit of telomerase. Science 276, 561–567 (1997).
Singer, M. S. & Gottschling, D. E. TLC1: template RNA component of Saccharomyces cerevisiae telomerase. Science 266, 404–409 (1994).
Lingner, J., Cech, T. R., Hughes, T. R. & Lundblad, V. Three Ever Shorter Telomere (EST) genes are dispensable for in vitro yeast telomerase activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 11190–11195 (1997).
Lundblad, V. & Szostak, J. W. A mutant with a defect in telomere elongation leads to senescence in yeast. Cell 57, 633–643 (1989).
Lendvay, T. S., Morris, D. K., Sah, J., Balasubramanian, B. & Lundblad, V. Senescence mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae with a defect in telomere replication identify three additional EST genes. Genetics 144, 1399–1412 (1996).
Seto, A. G., Livengood, A. J., Tzfati, Y., Blackburn, E. H. & Cech, T. R. A bulged stem tethers Est1p to telomerase RNA in budding yeasts. Genes Dev. 16, 2800–2810 (2002).
Nugent, C. I., Hughes, T. R., Lue, N. F. & Lundblad, V. Cdc13p: A single-strand telomeric DNA-binding protein with a dual role in yeast telomere maintenance. Science 274, 249–252 (1996).
Lin, J.-J. & Zakian, V. A. The Saccharomyces CDC13 protein is a single-strand TG1-3 telomeric DNA-binding protein in vitro that affects telomere behavior in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 13760–13765 (1996).
Taggart, A. K. P., Teng, S.-C. & Zakian, V. A. Est1p as a cell cycle-regulated activator of telomere-bound telomerase. Science 297, 1023–1026 (2002).
Tuzon, C. T., Wu, Y., Chan, A. & Zakian, V. A. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae telomerase subunit Est3 binds telomeres in a cell cycle- and Est1-dependent manner and interacts directly with Est1 in vitro. PLoS Genet . 7, e1002060 (2011).
Smogorzewska, A. & de Lange, T. Regulation of telomerase by telomeric proteins. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 73, 177–208 (2004).
Evans, S. K. & Lundblad, V. Est1 and Cdc13 as comediators of telomerase access. Science 286, 117–120 (1999).
Qi, H. & Zakian, V. A. The Saccharomyces telomere-binding protein Cdc13p interacts with both the catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase α and the telomerase-associated Est1 protein. Genes Dev. 14, 1777–1788 (2000).
Lin, J.-J. & Zakian, V. A. An in vitro assay for Saccharomyces telomerase required EST1. Cell 81, 1127–1135 (1995).
Steiner, B. R., Hidaka, K. & Futcher, B. Association of the EST1 protein with telomerase activity in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 2817–2821 (1996).
Bianchi, A., Negrini, S. & Shore, D. Delivery of yeast telomerase to a DNA break depends on the recruitment functions of Cdc13 and Est1. Mol. Cell 16, 139–146 (2004).
Pennock, E., Buckley, K. & Lundblad, V. Cdc13 delivers separate complexes to the telomere for end protection and replication. Cell 104, 387–396 (2001).
Chan, A., Boule, J.-B. & Zakian, V. A. Two pathways recruit telomerase to Saccharomyces cerevisiae telomeres. PLoS Genet . 4, e1000236 (2008).
Gallardo, F. et al. Live cell imaging of telomerase RNA dynamics reveals cell cycle-dependent clustering of telomerase at elongating telomeres. Mol. Cell 44, 819–827 (2011).
Tucey, T. M. & Lundblad, V. A yeast telomerase complex containing the Est1 recruitment protein is assembled early in the cell cycle. Biochemistry 52, 1131–1133 (2013).
Tucey, T. M. & Lundblad, V. Regulated assembly and disassembly of the yeast telomerase quaternary complex. Genes and Develop . 28, 2077–2089 (2014).
Zappulla, D. C., Roberts, J. N., Goodrich, K. J., Cech, T. R. & Wuttke, D. S. Inhibition of yeast telomerase action by the telomeric ssDNA-binding protein, Cdc13p. Nucleic Acids Res . 37, 354–367 (2009).
DeZwaan, D. C. & Freeman, B. C. The conserved Est1 protein stimulates telomerase DNA extension activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 17337–17342 (2009).
DeZwaan, D. C., Toogun, O. A., Echtenkamp, F. J. & Freeman, B. C. The Hsp82 molecular chaperone promotes a switch between unextendable and extendable telomere states. Nat. Struc. Mol. Biol. 16, 711–716 (2009).
Liao, X.-H., Zhang, M.-L., Yang, C.-P., Xu, L.-X. & Zhou, J.-Q. Characterization of recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae telomerase core enzyme purified from yeast. Biochem. J. 390, 169–176 (2005).
Cohn, C. & Blackburn, E. H. Yeast telomerases. Science 269, 396–400 (1995).
Lin, Y.-C., Hsu, C.-L., Shih, J.-W. & Lin, J.-J. Specific binding of single-stranded telomeric DNA by Cdc13p of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 24588–24593 (2001).
Li, J.-R. et al. Pif1 regulates telomere length by preferentially removing telomerase from long telomere ends. Nucleic Acids Res . 42, 8527–8536 (2014).
Lin, Y.-C., Lee, Y.-H. W. & Lin, J.-J. Genetic analysis reveals essential and non-essential amino acids within the telomeric DNA binding interface of Cdc13p. Biochem. J. 403, 289–295 (2007).
Virta-Pearlman, V., Morris, D. K. & Lundblad, V. Est1 has the properties of a single-stranded telomere end-binding protein. Genes Dev . 10, 3094–3104 (1996).
Wu, Y. & Zakian, V. A. The telomeric Cdc13 protein interacts directly with the telomerase subunit Est1 to bring it to telomeric DNA ends in vitro. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 20362–20369 (2011).
Zhang, M.-L. et al. Yeast telomerase subunit Est1p has guanine quadruplex-promoting activity that is required for telomere elongation. Nat. Struc. Mol. Biol. 17, 202–209 (2010).
Grandin, N., Reed, S. I. & Charbonneau, M. Stn1, a new Saccharomyces cerevisiae protein, is implicated in telomere size regulation in association with Cdc13. Genes Dev . 11, 512–527 (1997).
Grandin, N., Damon, C. & Charbonneau, M. Ten1 functions in telomere end protection and length regulation in association with Stn1 and Cdc13. EMBO J. 20, 1173–1183 (2001).
Hughes, T. R., Weilbaecher, R. G., Walterscheid, M. & Lundblad, V. Identification of the single-strand telomeric DNA binding domain of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Cdc13 protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 6457–6462 (2000).
Anderson, E. M., Halsey, W. A. & Wuttke, D. S. Delineation of the high-affinity single-stranded telomeric DNA-binding domain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Cdc13. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 4305–4313 (2002).
Kelleher, C., Kurth, I. & Lingner, J. Human protection of telomeres 1 (POT1) is a negative regulator of telomerase activity in vitro. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 808–818 (2005).
Lei, M., Zaug, A. J., Podell, E. R. & Cech, T. R. Switching human telomerase on and off with hPOT1 protein in vitro. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 20449–20456 (2005).
Puig, O. et al. The tandem affinity purification (TAP) method: a general procedure of protein complex purification. Methods 24, 218–229 (2001).
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. Jin-Qiu Zhou of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, China for providing the yeast telomerase expression system and Dr. Shiou-Ru Tzeng of the National Taiwan University for technical supports. This work was supported by the National Health Research Institute under grant NHRI-EX97-9625SI and the Ministry of Science and Technology under grants MOST104-2311-B-002-028-MY3 and MOST104-2321-B-002-036.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Y.-F.C., H.-W.L. and J.-J.L. designed research; Y.-F.C. conducted most of the experiments; Y.-C.L. established the primer extension assay; T.-Y.Y. and C.-P.C. isolated telomerase; C.-Y.L. and J.-R.L. performed single-molecule experiments; Y.-F.C., C.-Y.L., H.-W.L. and J.-J.L. analyzed data; Y.-C.L., H.-W.L. and J.-J.L. wrote the paper.
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, YF., Lu, CY., Lin, YC. et al. Modulation of yeast telomerase activity by Cdc13 and Est1 in vitro. Sci Rep 6, 34104 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep34104
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep34104
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.