Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Partial substitutions of animal with plant protein foods in Canadian diets have synergies and trade-offs among nutrition, health and climate outcomes

Abstract

Dietary guidelines emphasize the consumption of plant protein foods, but the implications of replacing animal with plant sources on a combination of diet sustainability dimensions are unknown. Using a combination of data from a national nutrition survey, greenhouse gas emissions from dataFIELD and relative risks from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017, we assess the impact of partially substituting red and processed meat or dairy with plant protein foods in Canadian self-selected diets on nutrition, health and climate outcomes. The substitutions induced minor changes to the percentage of the population below requirements for nutrients of concern, but increased calcium inadequacy by up to 14% when dairy was replaced. Replacing red and processed meat or dairy increased life expectancy by up to 8.7 months or 7.6 months, respectively. Diet-related greenhouse gas emissions decreased by up to 25% for red and processed meat and by up to 5% for dairy replacements. Co-benefits of partially substituting red and processed meat with plant protein foods among nutrition, health and climate outcomes are relevant for reshaping consumer food choices in addressing human and planetary health.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Adherence of observed and modelled diets to CFG based on HEFI-2019.
Fig. 2: Changes to the percentage of the population below DRI for nutrients of concern for modelled dietary substitutions relative to observed diets.
Fig. 3: Changes to the percentage of the population exceeding CFG recommendations for nutrients to limit for modelled dietary substitutions relative to observed diets.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Access to the 2015 CCHS—Nutrition microdata files is restricted to accredited researchers. To become accredited, individuals must apply for access by submitting a project proposal to Statistics Canada: https://www.statcan.gc.ca/en/microdata/data-centres/access. The authors declare that all other data used in this study are available as specified throughout the article and Supplementary Information. Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

SAS and R code (health outcomes) are publicly available and can be accessed at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10480135 (ref. 40).

References

  1. Willits-Smith, A., Aranda, R., Heller, M. C. & Rose, D. Addressing the carbon footprint, healthfulness, and costs of self-selected diets in the USA: a population-based cross-sectional study. Lancet Planet. Health 4, e98–e106 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Seves, S. M., Verkaik-Kloosterman, J., Biesbroek, S. & Temme, E. H. M. Are more environmentally sustainable diets with less meat and dairy nutritionally adequate? Public Health Nutr. 20, 2050–2062 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Biesbroek, S. et al. Reducing our environmental footprint and improving our health: greenhouse gas emission and land use of usual diet and mortality in EPIC-NL: a prospective cohort study. Environ. Health 13, 27 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Scarborough, P., Allender, S., Clarke, D., Wickramasinghe, K. & Rayner, M. Modelling the health impact of environmentally sustainable dietary scenarios in the UK. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 66, 710–715 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Temme, E. H. M. et al. Greenhouse gas emission of diets in the Netherlands and associations with food, energy and macronutrient intakes. Public Health Nutr. 18, 2433–2445 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Rose, D., Willits-Smith, A. M. & Heller, M. C. Single-item substitutions can substantially reduce the carbon and water scarcity footprints of US diets. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 115, 378–387 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Vieux, F., Soler, L. G., Touazi, D. & Darmon, N. High nutritional quality is not associated with low greenhouse gas emissions in self-selected diets of French adults. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 97, 569–583 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Canada’s Dietary Guidelines: For Health Professionals and Policy Makers (Health Canada, 2019); https://food-guide.canada.ca/en/guidelines/

  9. Auclair, O. & Burgos, S. A. Protein consumption in Canadian habitual diets: usual intake, inadequacy, and the contribution of animal- and plant-based foods to nutrient intakes. Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. 46, 501–510 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Auclair, O., Han, Y. & Burgos, S. A. Consumption of milk and alternatives and their contribution to nutrient intakes among Canadian adults: evidence from the 2015 Canadian Community Health Survey—Nutrition. Nutrients. 11, 1948 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Salomé, M. et al. Substituting meat or dairy products with plant-based substitutes has small and heterogeneous effects on diet quality and nutrient security: a simulation study in French adults (INCA3). J. Nutr. 151, 2435–2445 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Interim policy on the use of expired interim marketing authorizations related to food fortification. Health Canada https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/food-nutrition/legislation-guidelines/policies/interim-policy-on-use-expired-interim-marketing-authorizations-related-food-fortification.html#a61 (2022).

  13. Pawlak, R., Berger, J. & Hines, I. Iron status of vegetarian adults: a review of literature. Am. J. Lifestyle Med. 12, 486–498 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Harrison, S., Lemieux, S. & Lamarche, B. Assessing the impact of replacing foods high in saturated fats with foods high in unsaturated fats on dietary fat intake among Canadians. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 115, 877–885 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Astrup, A. et al. Saturated fats and health: a reassessment and proposal for food-based recommendations: JACC state-of-the-art review. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 76, 844–857 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Givens, D. I. Saturated fats, dairy foods and cardiovascular health: no longer a curious paradox? Nutr. Bull. 47, 407–422 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Patterson, E., Eustachio Colombo, P., Milner, J., Green, R. & Elinder, L. S. Potential health impact of increasing adoption of sustainable dietary practices in Sweden. BMC Public Health 21, 1332 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Frehner, A., De Boer, I. J. M., Muller, A., Van Zanten, H. H. E. & Schader, C. Consumer strategies towards a more sustainable food system: insights from Switzerland. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 115, 1039–1047 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Vieux, F. et al. More sustainable European diets based on self-selection do not require exclusion of entire categories of food. J. Clean. Prod. 248, 119298 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Vanderlee, L. et al. Meat-reduced dietary practices and efforts in 5 countries: analysis of cross-sectional surveys in 2018 and 2019. J. Nutr. 152, 57S–66S (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Usual dietary intakes: the NCI method. National Cancer Institute https://epi.grants.cancer.gov/diet/usualintakes/method.html (2018).

  22. Stanton, A. V. et al. 36-fold higher estimate of deaths attributable to red meat intake in GBD 2019: is this reliable? Lancet 399, e23–e26 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Afshin, A. et al. Health effects of dietary risks in 195 countries, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet 393, 1958–1972 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hall, K. D. et al. Quantification of the effect of energy imbalance on bodyweight. Lancet 378, 826–837 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Reference guide to understanding and using the data: 2015 Canadian Community Health Survey—Nutrition. Health Canada https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/food-nutrition/food-nutrition-surveillance/health-nutrition-surveys/canadiancommunity-health-survey-cchs/reference-guide-understanding-using-data-2015.html#a1.1.3 (2017).

  26. Canadian Nutrient File (Health Canada, accessed 24 October 2019); https://food-nutrition.canada.ca/cnf-fce/index-eng.jsp

  27. Auclair, O. & Burgos, S. A. Carbon footprint of Canadian self-selected diets: comparing intake of foods, nutrients, and diet quality between low- and high-greenhouse gas emission diets. J. Clean. Prod. 316, 128245 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Brassard, D. et al. Development of the Healthy Eating Food Index (HEFI)-2019 measuring adherence to Canada’s Food Guide 2019 recommendations on healthy food choices. Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. 47, 595–610 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Dietary reference intakes tables. Health Canada https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/food-nutrition/healthy-eating/dietary-reference-intakes/tables.html#def (2023).

  30. Health Canada’s proposed changes to the core nutrients declared in the Canadian nutrition facts table. Health Canada https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/food-nutrition/public-involvement-partnerships/technical-consultation-proposedchanges-core-nutrients-declared-canadian-nutrition-facts-table/consultation.html (2014).

  31. Tooze, J. A. et al. A new statistical method for estimating the usual intake of episodically consumed foods with application to their distribution. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 106, 1575–1587 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Advice on vitamin and mineral supplementation. Health Canada https://food-guide.canada.ca/en/applying-guidelines/advice-vitamin-mineral-supplementation/ (2022).

  33. Garriguet, D. Combining nutrient intake from food/beverages and vitamin/mineral supplements. Health Rep. 21, 71–84 (2010).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Miller, B. G. & Hurley, J. F. Life table methods for quantitative impact assessments in chronic mortality. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 57, 200–206 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Eustachio Colombo, P. et al. Pathways to “5-a-day”: modeling the health impacts and environmental footprints of meeting the target for fruit and vegetable intake in the United Kingdom. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 114, 530–539 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Table 17-10-0005-01. Population Estimates on July 1st, by Age and Sex (Statistics Canada, 2022); https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid=1710000501

  37. Heller, M. C., Willits-Smith, A., Meyer, R., Keoleian, G. A. & Rose, D. Greenhouse gas emissions and energy use associated with production of individual self-selected US diets. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 044004 (2018).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Vergé, X. P. C. et al. Carbon footprint of Canadian dairy products: calculations and issues. J. Dairy Sci. 96, 6091–6104 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Hallström, E. et al. Dietary environmental impacts relative to planetary boundaries for six environmental indicators—a population-based study. J. Clean. Prod. 373, 133949 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Auclair, O., Eustachio Colombo, P., Milner, J. & Burgos, S. A. oliviaauclair/Auclair-et-al_Replacing-Protein-Foods. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10480135 (2024).

  41. Moberg, E., Karlsson Potter, H., Wood, A., Hansson, P.-A. & Röös, E. Benchmarking the Swedish diet relative to global and national environmental targets—identification of indicator limitations and data gaps. Sustainability 12, 1407 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The analysis presented in this paper was conducted at the McGill–Concordia Laboratory of the Quebec Inter-University Centre for Social Statistics, which is part of the Canadian Research Data Centre Network. The services and activities provided by the McGill–Concordia Laboratory of the Quebec Inter-University Centre for Social Statistics are made possible by the financial or in-kind support of the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the Canadian Foundation for Innovation, Statistics Canada and McGill University. The views expressed in this paper do not necessarily represent that of the Canadian Research Data Centre Network or its partners. We thank D. Garriguet of Health Canada for providing guidance with the NCI method, I. Michaud of Statistics Canada for guidance with multiple comparison testing procedures and D. Forest of Statistics Canada for vetting the data. O.A. is supported by a doctoral scholarship from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, a Graduate Excellence Fellowship from McGill University and supplementary funding from a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada grant to S.A.B. (RGPIN-2017-05007).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

O.A. conducted the analyses and wrote the article. O.A. and S.A.B. conceptualized the study, and analysed and interpretated the data. P.E.C. and J.M. provided code for the health analyses and aided with interpretation of the results. All authors revised and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sergio A. Burgos.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

O.A., P.E.C. and J.M. declare no competing interests. S.A.B. reports receiving honoraria as a speaker in 2019 and grant funding for research unrelated to this paper from Dairy Farmers of Canada.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Food thanks Jelena Meinilä, Darel Wee Kiat Toh and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Table 1 Intake (g/d) of animal and plant protein foods for observed and modeled diets
Extended Data Table 2 Healthy Eating Food Index-2019 total and component scores for observed and modeled diets
Extended Data Table 3 Percentage of the Canadian adult population below the Estimated Average Requirement for vitamin D
Extended Data Table 4 Percentage of the Canadian adult population below the Estimated Average Requirement for calcium
Extended Data Table 5 Percentage of the Canadian adult population below the Estimated Average Requirement for iron
Extended Data Table 6 Percentage of the Canadian adult population below the Adequate Intake for potassium
Extended Data Table 7 Percentage of the Canadian adult population above Canada’s Food Guide recommendations for sodium
Extended Data Table 8 Percentage of the Canadian adult population above Canada’s Food Guide recommendations for saturated fat
Extended Data Table 9 Percentage of the Canadian adult population above Canada’s Food Guide recommendations for free sugars

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Methods and Tables 1–8.

Reporting Summary

Source data

Source Data Fig. 1

Adherence to Canada’s Food Guide for observed and modelled diets.

Source Data Fig. 2

Changes in the percentage of the population below requirements for nutrients of concern for modelled relative to observed diets.

Source Data Fig. 3

Changes in the percentage of the population above recommendations for nutrients to limit for modelled relative to observed diets.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Auclair, O., Eustachio Colombo, P., Milner, J. et al. Partial substitutions of animal with plant protein foods in Canadian diets have synergies and trade-offs among nutrition, health and climate outcomes. Nat Food 5, 148–157 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-024-00925-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-024-00925-y

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene