China purchases around 66% of the soy that is traded internationally. This strains the global food supply and contributes to greenhouse gas emissions. Here we show that optimizing the maize and soy production of China can improve its self-sufficiency and also alleviate adverse environmental effects. Using data from more than 1,800 counties in China, we estimate the area-weighted yield potential (Ypot) and yield gaps, setting the attainable yield (Yatt) as the yield achieved by the top 10% of producers per county. We also map out county-by-county acreage allocation and calculate the attainable production capacity according to a set of sustainability criteria. Under optimized conditions, China would be able to produce all the maize and 45% of the soy needed by 2035—while reducing nitrogen fertilizer use by 26%, reactive nitrogen loss by 28% and greenhouse gas emissions by 19%—with the same acreage as 2017, our reference year.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 per month
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Get just this article for as long as you need it
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
The data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and its Supplementary Information and Supplementary Data files. Source data are provided with this paper.
The custom code generated for this study is available in the Supplementary Data file.
FAOSTAT: Statistics Division of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO, 2019); http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#home
Taherzadeh, O. & Caro, D. Drivers of water and land use embodied in international soybean trade. J. Clean. Prod. 223, 83–93 (2019).
Sun, J. et al. Importing food damages domestic environment: evidence from global soybean trade. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 5415–5419 (2018).
Ying, H. et al. Safeguarding food supply and groundwater safety for maize production in China. Environ. Sci. Technol. 54, 9939–9948 (2020).
Hill, J. et al. Air-quality-related health damages of maize. Nat. Sustain. 2, 397–403 (2019).
Fuchs, R. et al. US–China trade war imperils Amazon rainforest. Nature 567, 451–454 (2019).
Rajao, R. et al. The rotten apples of Brazil’s agribusiness. Science 369, 246–248 (2020).
Foley, J. A. et al. Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature 478, 337–342 (2011).
Bai, Z. H. et al. China’s livestock transition: driving forces, impacts, and consequences. Sci. Adv. 4, 8534 (2018).
Cassman, K. G. & Grassini, P. A global perspective on sustainable intensification research. Nat. Sustain. 3, 262–268 (2020).
National Bureau of Statistics of China. China Statistical Yearbook (in Chinese) (China Statistics Press, 2001, 2018).
Cui, Z. L., Vitousek, P. M., Zhang, F. S. & Chen, X. P. Strengthening agronomy research for food security and environmental quality. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 1639–1641 (2016).
Liu, W. F. et al. China’s food supply sources under trade conflict states and limited domestic land and water resources. Earths Future 8, e2020EF001482 (2020).
Commodity Markets (World Bank, 2019). https://www.worldbank.org/en/research/commodity-markets
Liu, B. H. et al. Estimating maize yield potential and yield gap with agro-climatic zones in China—distinguish irrigated and rainfed conditions. Agr. Forest Meteorol. 239, 108–117 (2017).
Chen, X. P. et al. Integrated soil–crop system management for food security. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 6399–6404 (2011).
Chen, X. P. et al. Producing more grain with lower environmental costs. Nature 514, 486–489 (2014).
Cui, Z. L. et al. Pursuing sustainable productivity with millions of smallholder farmers. Nature 555, 363–366 (2018).
Van Ittersum, M. K. et al. Yield gap analysis with local to global relevance—a review. Field Crops Res. 143, 4–17 (2013).
Global Yield Gap Data (Global Yield Gap Atlas, 2020). http://www.yieldgap.org
Cassman, K. G., Dobermann, A., Walters, D. T. & Yang, H. Meeting cereal demand while protecting natural resources and improving environmental quality. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 28, 315–358 (2003).
Lobell, D. B., Cassman, K. G. & Field, C. B. Crop yield gaps: their importance, magnitudes, and causes. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 34, 179–204 (2009).
Sentelhas, P. C. et al. The soybean yield gap in Brazil—magnitude, causes and possible solutions for sustainable production. J. Agr. Sci. 153, 1394–1411 (2015).
Drinkwater, L. E., Wagoner, P. & Sarrantonio, M. Legume-based cropping systems have reduced carbon and nitrogen losses. Nature 396, 262–265 (1998).
Snapp, S. S. et al. Biodiversity can support a greener revolution in Africa. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 20840–20845 (2010).
Price Bureau of the National Development and Reform Commission of China. China Agricultural Products Cost-Benefit Compilation of Information 2017 (in Chinese) (China Statistics Press, 2017).
Spielman, D. J., Byerlee, D., Alemu, D. & Kelemework, D. Policies to promote cereal intensification in Ethiopia: the search for appropriate public and private roles. Food Policy 35, 185–194 (2010).
Zhang, W. F. et al. Closing yield gaps in China by empowering smallholder farmers. Nature 537, 671–674 (2016).
Liu, J. G., Lundqvist, J., Weinberg, J. & Gustafsson, J. Food losses and waste in China and their implication for water and land. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 10137–10144 (2013).
Dou, Z. X., Toth, J. D. & Westendorf, M. L. Food waste for livestock feeding: feasibility, safety, and sustainability implications 2017. Glob. Food. Secur. 17, 154–161 (2018).
Challinor, A. J. et al. A meta-analysis of crop yield under climate change and adaptation. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 287–291 (2014).
Yang, H. S. et al. Hybrid–Maize—a maize simulation model that combines two crop modeling approaches. Field Crops Res. 87, 131–154 (2004).
Yang, H. S., Dobermann, A., Cassman, K. G. & Walters, D. T. Features, applications, and limitations of the Hybrid–Maize simulation model. Agron. J. 98, 737–748 (2006).
Setiyono, T. D. et al. Simulation of soybean growth and yield in near optimal growth conditions. Field Crops Res. 119, 161–174 (2010).
Guo, J. M. et al. Designing corn management strategies for high yield and high nitrogen use efficiency. Agron. J. 108, 922–929 (2016).
Wu, J., Gao, X. J., Giorgi, F. & Chen, D. L. Changes of effective temperature and cold/hot days in late decades over China based on a high resolution gridded observation dataset. Int. J. Climatol. 37, 788–800 (2017).
Yang, K. & He, J. China Meteorological Forcing Dataset (1979–2018) (National Tibetan Plateau Data Center, 2019); https://doi.org/10.11888/AtmosphericPhysics.tpe.249369.file
Ma, L. et al. Exploring future food provision scenarios for China. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 1385–1393 (2019).
Prasad, A. M., Iverson, L. R. & Liaw, A. Newer classification and regression tree techniques: bagging and random forests for ecological prediction. Ecosystems 9, 181–199 (2006).
Audsley, E. et al. Harmonisation of Environmental Life Cycle assessment for Agriculture: Final Report Concerted Action MR3-CT94-2028 (Silsoe Research Institute, 1997).
Liu, Q. et al. Biochar application as a tool to decrease soil nitrogen losses (NH3 volatilization, N2O emissions, and N leaching) from croplands: options and mitigation strength in a global perspective. Global Change Biol. 25, 2077–2093 (2019).
Eggelston, S. et al. 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IGES, IPCC, 2006).
Lin, H. F. et al. Effect of irrigation method on farmers’ planting decision and the economy: a case in Zhangbei County, Hebei Province. Chin. J. Eco Agric. 27, 1293–1300 (2019).
We acknowledge all those who provided local assistance or technical services involving the farmer survey. We also thank Z. Wu for editing the manuscript. This work was financially supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFD0200105), the Taishan Scholarship Project of Shandong Province (no. TS201712082) and the Science and Technology Plan Project of Qinghai Province (2019-NK-A11-02).
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information Nature Food thanks Martin van Ittersum and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Discussion, Figs. 1–10, Tables 1–8 and references.
Supplementary data and code.
Source Data Fig. 1
Statistical source data.
Source Data Fig. 2
Statistical source data.
Source Data Fig. 3
Statistical source data.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, Z., Ying, H., Chen, M. et al. Optimization of China’s maize and soy production can ensure feed sufficiency at lower nitrogen and carbon footprints. Nat Food 2, 426–433 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-021-00300-1
This article is cited by
A nexus between green digital finance and green innovation under asymmetric effects on renewable energy markets: a study on Chinese green cities
Environmental Science and Pollution Research (2023)
Critical source apportionment and source-oriented risk-based evaluation of toxic metals in soils and rice around brick kiln area
Arabian Journal of Geosciences (2023)
Integrating crop redistribution and improved management towards meeting China’s food demand with lower environmental costs
Nature Food (2022)
Bottom-up re-estimations of greenhouse gas and atmospheric pollutants derived from straw burning of three cereal crops production in China based on a national questionnaire
Environmental Science and Pollution Research (2021)