Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Fitness consequences of targeted gene flow to counter impacts of drying climates on terrestrial-breeding frogs

Abstract

Targeted gene flow (TGF) could bolster the adaptive potential of isolated populations threatened by climate change, but could also lead to outbreeding depression. Here, we explore these possibilities by creating mixed- and within-population crosses in a terrestrial-breeding frog species threatened by a drying climate. We reared embryos of the crawling frog (Pseudophryne guentheri) on wet and dry soils and quantified fitness-related traits upon hatching. TGF produced mixed outcomes in hybrids, which depended on crossing direction (origin of gametes from each sex). North-south crosses led to low embryonic survival if eggs were of a southern origin, and high malformation rates when eggs were from a northern population. Conversely, east-west crosses led to one instance of hybrid vigour, evident by increased fitness and desiccation tolerance of hybrid offspring relative to offspring produced from within-population crosses. These contrasting results highlight the need to experimentally evaluate the outcomes of TGF for focal species across generations prior to implementing management actions.

Introduction

Genetic variation in traits related to environmental tolerance can allow populations to rapidly adapt to environmental change1,2. Yet, as habitats become fragmented, gene flow between isolated populations is constrained3,4,5, reducing genetic diversity and adaptive capacity. To mitigate these problems, targeted gene flow (TGF, also known as assisted gene flow) is suggested for future management of threatened plant6,7,8 and animal species9,10,11. TGF involves the deliberate translocation of individuals or gametes within a species’ indigenous range to increase the genetic variation (and concurrently the fitness) of recipient populations, and to promote their adaptation to anticipated local conditions10,12. Many species show geographically based variation in adaptive traits13,14,15, and therefore TGF can potentially increase genetic variation of recipient populations in a desired direction16. In this way, TGF can potentially reinstate or increase natural gene flow between populations to facilitate adaptation16,17.

The current enthusiasm for TGF is tempered by concerns over risks associated with mixing previously disjunct populations and subsequent outbreeding depression, where offspring of local and introduced parents have a lower fitness than pure-cross offspring of the recipient population18,19,20,21. Outbreeding depression can arise in F1 or later generations as a result of genetic incompatibilities (e.g., via underdominance or epistatic interactions22) or via the dilution of local adaptation in the recipient population (e.g., if populations are adapted to conditions other than climate23). While the risks of outbreeding depression may be overemphasised for some taxa10,12,20,24, the consequences of mixing populations are difficult to predict18,25. It is therefore important to assess the potential risks and benefits of TGF empirically, something only a handful of studies have done to date11,16,26,27,28,29,30.

Amphibians are among the most vulnerable taxa to climate change31,32. Many species have undergone climate-related extinctions or declines32,33,34,35, and species distribution models suggest that a further 12-47% of anuran species are at risk of extinction due to climate change36. Reduced precipitation is an obvious threat, as unshelled eggs and highly permeable skin render all amphibian life stages susceptible to desiccation and subsequent mortality33. However, as some amphibian populations show greater tolerance to desiccation stress than others37, TGF could be strategically employed to enhance the resilience of populations adapted to higher-rainfall regions that are now drying.

Here, we explore the potential of TGF to mitigate declines in population-level fitness using the crawling frog, Pseudophryne guentheri, a species in which populations are threatened by habitat loss and declining winter rainfall (see Methods). Application of TGF could potentially mitigate these dual threats to population persistence, but as outbreeding depression has been shown in laboratory crosses of a congeneric species30, TGF could also be ineffective, or have deleterious consequences. We evaluated TGF within a laboratory setting by creating pure and reciprocal crosses among four geographically distant populations. We then assessed phenotypic traits in the resulting offspring, comparing individuals reared on wet soils (−10 kPa, a benign treatment) to those reared on drier soils (−400 kPa) that significantly reduce survival and hatchling fitness, particularly in mesic populations37,38. Our experiments were designed to answer three questions: (1) do offspring from between-population crosses show hybrid vigour or reduced fitness; (2) does the effect depend on geographic or genetic distance; and (3) does the direction of the cross influence TGF outcomes?

Results

We sourced P. guentheri from low-rainfall regions at the northern edge of the species’ range and from higher-rainfall regions close to the centre the species range (Fig. 1 and Table 1). We then used linear mixed-effects models to compare offspring traits from pure and hybrid crosses reared under two environments. We focused on a range of traits putatively tied to fitness, including embryonic survival, the time required to hatch after inundation, the proportion of malformed hatchlings, and wet weight, developmental stage and swimming performance at hatching. Across all within- and between-population crosses created in this experiment, low soil moisture significantly reduced embryonic survival, increased the time required to hatch after inundation, reduced the wet weight and developmental stage of hatchlings, and increased the proportion of malformed hatchlings (Supplementary Table 1 and Fig. 2). Soil moisture also affected the swimming performance of hatchlings, with swimming velocity decreasing in hatchlings reared on dry soils (Supplementary Table 2 and Fig. 3).

Fig. 1: Details of four breeding populations in southwestern Australia from which adult P. guentheri were collected.
figure 1

a The species’ distribution (grey line; based on occurrence records from the Atlas of Living Australia) spans a ~300–1250 mm annual rainfall gradient, and both adults and terrestrial embryonic stages show clinal variation in desiccation tolerance, with range edge populations being more resistant to dry conditions than populations at the core of the species range37. b Matrix of pairwise geographic and genetic distances between populations, where genetic distances (FST) were calculated in an earlier study39 using 12,787 selectively neutral SNP loci. c a gravid female (collected from all sites except D). d an adult male (collected from all sites).

Table 1 Site characteristics, sample numbers and genetic diversity estimates39 (He = mean expected heterozygosity, FIS = inbreeding coefficient) for each P. guentheri population.
Fig. 2: Fertilisation success and embryonic and hatchling trait responses to dry and wet rearing environments in within- and between-population crosses of four populations.
figure 2

Fertilisation success was measured for 92 population crosses (a) and traits were measured for between 1460 and 2793 embryos and tadpoles (bf, see Supplementary Table 1). The first letter of the parental origin represents the female (population) origin, and the second letter represents the male origin. Mean responses (large white or black circles, according to treatment) are superimposed over boxplots, which are superimposed over raw data (jittered small blue circles). Lower and upper boxplot boundaries are 25th and 75th percentiles, respectively, the thicker line inside the box is the median value, and lower and upper error bars are 10th and 90th percentile, respectively.

Fig. 3: Swimming performance traits (a–d) of hatchlings reared at two soil treatments (dry and wet) in within- and between-population crosses of four populations.
figure 3

Traits were measured for 633 tadpoles (Supplementary Table 2). The first letter of the parental origin represents the female (population) origin, and the second letter represents the male origin. Mean responses (large white or black circles, according to treatment) are superimposed over boxplots, which are superimposed over raw data (jittered small blue circles). Lower and upper boxplot boundaries are 25th and 75th percentiles, respectively, the thicker line inside the box is the median value, and lower and upper error bars are 10th and 90th percentiles, respectively.

Fitness-related traits differed remarkably among crosses due to a complex interplay between many of the fixed effects we considered (soil moisture, female population origin, male population origin, and all interactions). The population origin of females was a significant effect in six of the nine traits examined (Supplementary Tables 1 and 2). For example, hatching wet mass was greatest in offspring from females from population A, and lowest in offspring where females originated from populations B and C, irrespective of ovum size. Male origin effects were also strong and significantly affected all but one offspring trait (Supplementary Tables 1 and 2), and female origin-by-male origin interactions were highly significant in all traits (Supplementary Tables 1 and 2). This latter result showed that the interaction between female and male gametes affects offspring fitness in hybrid and non-hybrid crosses, and that the direction of the cross (e.g., AB versus BA, where the first letter indicates the origin of the egg) influences the outcome. Additionally, many of the female, male, and female-by-male origin effects were modified by the developmental environment (i.e., wet or dry soils; Supplementary Tables 1 and 2). In light of these complex patterns, the outcomes of each type of cross are discussed in turn below.

Within-population crosses (AA, BB & CC)

Within-population (pure) crosses differed in their desiccation tolerance in a pattern consistent with site water availability, in agreement with a related study37. Offspring from pure crosses of the wettest population (AA) were most sensitive to dry conditions, with embryonic survival, hatchling wet weight, and developmental stage decreasing markedly, and hatchling malformations becoming more prominent if embryos were reared on dry soils (Fig. 2). Furthermore, swimming performance of AA hatchlings reared on dry soils was reduced substantially, with hatchlings swimming more slowly and less linearly than those from the wetter rearing environment (Fig. 3). In contrast, offspring from pure crosses of population C, situated near the northern range edge, showed little response to the dry rearing treatment (CC in Figs. 2 and 3).

Long-distance (north-south) hybrid crosses (AC, AD, BC, BD, CA, CB)

Embryonic survival was very low (~15%) when eggs from southern populations A or B were crossed with sperm from northern populations C or D, both in the dry and wet soil treatments (Fig. 2a). Offspring from these crosses that did survive to hatching, however, hatched more quickly in the dry treatment compared to their pure-cross counterparts (Fig. 2b). Furthermore, the developmental stage at hatching in AC and AD crosses was more advanced (average Gosner stage 27.3) in the dry treatment compared to pure AA crosses (average Gosner stage 26.5), indicating slightly more rapid development (Fig. 2d).

Offspring originating from long-distance crosses in the opposite direction (eggs from northern population C crossed with sperm from southern populations A or B), also had reduced survival in dry and wet treatments compared to pure CC crosses, although these effects were much less severe, with at least 55% of embryos hatching (Fig. 2a). Approximately one-third of hatchlings from these crosses were malformed, irrespective of the rearing environment (Fig. 2e), and their swimming performance was poor (Fig. 3). Furthermore, the developmental stage at hatching was lower compared to CC crosses (Fig. 2d) and the time required to hatch after inundation was greater in the dry treatment (Fig. 2b).

Shorter-distance (east-west) hybrid crosses (AB, BA, CD)

Offspring originating from hybrid crosses of two populations located near the centre of the species’ range (AB; eggs from population A crossed with sperm from population B) showed enhanced desiccation tolerance compared to AA crosses in all traits studied. As such, embryonic survival increased, and the time required to hatch and the number of hatchling malformations decreased in AB offspring reared on dry soils (Fig. 2a, b, d). Additionally, tadpole wet mass and developmental stage at hatching were greater in AB offspring compared to either pure-cross counterparts (AA or BB; Fig. 2c, d), both in the wet and dry treatments, and their swimming performance was enhanced (Fig. 3).

Offspring originating from short-distance crosses in the opposite direction (eggs from population B crossed with sperm from population A) took longer to hatch after inundation relative to BB crosses, and their developmental stage at hatching was reduced slightly, both in the wet and dry treatments (Fig. 2b, d). Otherwise, BA crosses had similar fitness to pure BB crosses.

Offspring originating from short-distance crosses between the two populations at the northern edge the species’ range (CD; eggs of population C crossed with sperm from population D) barely differed in desiccation tolerance and fitness traits compared to CC offspring. Wet mass at hatching was increased slightly in the dry treatment, and developmental stage at hatching was marginally higher in the wet treatment in CD crosses, compared to pure-cross counterparts (CC).

Discussion

Reciprocal crosses between three of four P. guentheri populations resulted in exceptionally diverse outcomes for traits putatively linked to fitness (Fig. 4). Reduced fitness, potentially attributable to outbreeding depression, was apparent in all offspring originating from long-distance crosses (north-south), whereas shorter-distance crosses (east-west) led to two neutral outcomes and one instance of hybrid vigour across all traits measured. Intriguingly, the origin of the gametes greatly influenced offspring traits in the one east-west reciprocal cross; sperm from population B mixed with eggs from population A produced desiccation-tolerant phenotypes, but not vice versa. Asymmetries were also apparent in north-south crosses, where very low embryonic survival resulted from northern sperm/southern eggs, but better survival yet high malformation rates in hatchlings produced from southern sperm and northern eggs. While lending support to the view that the risk of outbreeding depression increases with genetic, geographic and environmental distance21, the fittest progeny were produced by mixing two genetically distinct populations, physically separated by 100 km, and this fitness advantage (relative to pure crosses) was achieved both under benign developmental environments, and under more stressful conditions that may simulate future environments. This result is in stark contrast to outbreeding depression inferred in a related species (P. bibronii), where populations just 20 km apart were mixed and produced largely inviable offspring30. We discuss our key findings in turn below, and conclude with commentary on the potential application of TGF in this genus.

Fig. 4: Summary of the effects of male (population) origin on fitness-related traits in P. guentheri hatchlings, where orange arrows denote negative effects, blue arrows positive effects and grey arrows neutral effects.
figure 4

Arrow directions indicate the mixing of sperm with eggs in populations A, B and C. As we did not obtain gravid females from population D, only crosses between populations A, B and C were reciprocal. The background image shows an example of a BB hatchling, and sperm images indicate different sperm morphology between A/B and C/D males.

Our demonstration of reduced fitness in F1 hybrids originating from long-distance (~460 km) north-south crosses is consistent with asymmetric reproductive isolation, as reciprocal crosses produced different levels of fertilisation success and hybrid inviability. Asymmetric reproductive isolation is common at the species level41 and is frequently the result of Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities, where two species accumulate complementary genes that have no deleterious effects within species, but cause inviability or sterility when combined with genes from another species (complementary epistasis between loci)41,42,43,44. Additionally, cytonuclear incompatibility (=discordance) is likely to explain asymmetrical outcomes in reciprocal crosses of two species of newt (Triturus cristatus and T. marmoratus)45, and differential growth performance across mitotypes of the salamanders Ambystoma macrodactylum46. In our current study, reproductive isolation is positively correlated with pairwise genetic distance (and thus, presumably, time of divergence)47, and it appears that the drier range edge (northern) and mesic (southern) populations of P. guentheri have sufficient genetic divergence for reproductive isolation to occur.

In frogs, the lower threshold for the evolution of hybrid inviability is estimated to be a Nei’s genetic distance (DA) of 0.348. Genetic analysis of 12  P. guentheri populations, based on > 12,000 single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers, revealed that the genetic distance between the northern (C, D) and southern (A, B) populations used in this study was well below this threshold (DA = 0.14)39. However, strong sexual selection might facilitate rapid evolution of reproductive isolation, even when the genetic distance between populations is low49. Furthermore, the relationship between hybrid inviability and genetic divergence can differ greatly, even between closely related taxa18. For example, crosses between Drosophila species that diverged 0.35 Myr ago resulted in outbreeding depression in the F250, while hybridisations between other Drosophila species isolated for much longer (3–4.3 Myr51) resulted in F2 heterosis52. This makes it difficult to predict the severity of outbreeding depression in advance, and builds the case to experimentally evaluate the outcomes of TGF for focal species across generations16.

Recent findings for P. guentheri have revealed considerable differences in sperm characteristics between the northern and southern populations used in this study53. For example, spermatozoa from populations C and D swum more slowly and in a less linear fashion than sperm from populations A and B, and a smaller proportion of C/D sperm were active53. Furthermore, C/D spermatozoa were smaller (both shorter tails and heads) with broader heads53. Eggs from populations A and B also took substantially longer to show signs of fertilisation when mixed with sperm from populations C and D (see Methods). Therefore, atypical spermatozoa–egg interactions54 may have contributed to slow fertilisation rates in long-distance crosses, highlighting that non-genetic constraints may affect the application of TGF in conservation programmes.

Despite forming distinct genetic clusters39, short-distance (~100 km) crosses between populations A and B led to asymmetric hybrid vigour. When sperm from population B fertilised eggs from population A (the most mesic site in this study), the resulting offspring showed enhanced desiccation tolerance relative to AA offspring. These effects were very strong in most traits measured, to the extent that trait responses of AB hatchlings resembled those of BB offspring in the drier treatment. For example, embryonic survival of AB hybrids was greater (22% difference), time to hatching was faster (37% difference) and the number of hatchling malformations was reduced (46% difference) in the drier treatment relative to AA offspring (Fig. 2). Furthermore, hatchling wet mass and developmental stage in hybrids were greater compared to their AA counterparts, and their swimming performance was enhanced (Figs. 2 and 3).

These trait differences are likely to provide fitness benefits in a drier climate. For example, if hatching-stage embryos breach their egg capsules more quickly when flooded, the resulting larvae are more likely to be washed into pools of standing water where they can feed and seek refuge. Furthermore, faster development rates allow embryos to hatch earlier if an appropriate stimulus is received (flooding lowers PO2 and thereby triggers hatching in a related species55), which lowers risks such as predation or fungal infestation of eggs56,57. Finally, malformations and body size affect swimming performance at hatching, which in turn influences predator avoidance and foraging efficiency58,59,60,61,62,63. As malformations can persist past metamorphosis64, they are likely to have long-term consequences on survival and fitness.

Whether the increased desiccation tolerance in AB offspring is the result of hybrid vigour, introduction of desiccation-tolerant genes, or both, is difficult to disentangle. Importantly, the cause of these effects matters greatly for the long-term outcomes of TGF. Hybrid vigour most commonly arises due to immigrant alleles masking deleterious alleles in the receiving population65,66. Any increase in population fitness following hybridisation is expressed particularly strongly in the F1 generation, but is likely to disappear in subsequent generations when potentially deleterious interactions among recessive alleles at different loci become exposed to selection due to recombination67. There are numerous examples of outbreeding depression following initial heterosis across a range of taxa, including invertebrates19,68, birds69 and mammals70. Yet, if enhanced performance of AB hybrids is the result of introduction of desiccation-tolerant genes from population B, then the positive effects observed here are likely to persist in the long-term, and selection may favour the establishment of these genes within the recipient population.

Although multi-generational studies are needed to separate the origin of these effects, comparison of trait responses between pure and hybrid crosses suggests that introduction of pre-adapted genes may have contributed to faster hatching (and at a more advanced developmental stage) in BA hybrids in the dry treatment. In pure crosses, both traits varied among populations in a pattern consistent with local water availability, with AA offspring (from the most mesic population) being the slowest to hatch, and at a less-advanced developmental stage, and CC offspring (from the driest population where we obtained females) hatching and developing the fastest in the drier treatment. If males carry locally adapted genes for these traits, we would expect their expression to be altered in hybrids in a pattern that reflects annual rainfall (or related abiotic variables) at the sites from which males were sourced. Accordingly, AB, AC and AD hybrids should hatch more quickly in the drier treatment compared to AA offspring. Analogously, BA offspring would be expected to take longer to hatch in the drier treatment than BB offspring (whereas BC and BD offspring should hatch more quickly), and CA and CB offspring should take longer to hatch compared to CC offspring. Our data (Fig. 2b, d) show this pattern for the ‘time to hatching’ trait, and for developmental stage at hatching.

The strength of male population origin effects, which exceeded treatment effects in both traits (Supplementary Table 1), further underscores the role that male population origin plays in altering the desiccation tolerance of hybrids. Alternatively, the negative effects of genetic incompatibility may be exacerbated under stressful environments71, consequently leading to different offspring fitness and desiccation tolerance amongst hybrid crosses. However, given that positive outcomes were observed in some crosses (e.g., the time to hatching was reduced), despite genetic incompatibilities (low embryonic survival), this latter explanation is less likely. Another possibility is that locally adapted phenotypes produced in different environments reflect interactions between mitochondrial genes (transmitted via females) and nuclear genes, and so mitotypes might modulate the expression of traits passed on by males. Mitonuclear/environmental interactions have recently been shown in insects72 and birds73, but mitonuclear co-evolution has received limited attention in amphibian populations46. In contrast, polyploidy is well documented in anuran amphibians74, and dosage effects in polyploid lineages could also potentially explain asymmetry in phenotypes created by crosses of the same populations in reciprocal directions. As polyploidy may be generated via hybridisation74, future research using this model system could investigate chromosome numbers in parents and offspring to refute or confirm the possibility that polyploids exist or can be created in P. guentheri.

The ideas presented above are necessarily speculative, and we are a long way from understanding how admixture of populations will play out in the short and longer term. An encouraging result in our focal system is that desired traits (in this instance those related to desiccation tolerance) can be achieved by mixing male gametes from the ‘pre-adapted’ population with female gametes in the target population. This finding has great practical importance; females are generally difficult to locate, and may ovulate and sometimes expel eggs in transit, so it would be logistically challenging to move their gametes into a target population at scale. In contrast, calling males can be easily collected from a breeding chorus, and their gametes harvested and stored for up to two weeks75. Hence in practice, multi-male sperm suspensions (as used here—see Methods) could be pipetted onto egg masses freshly stripped from females within a field setting, effectively seeding a population with new genetic material if most females can be intercepted before mating. Indeed, it has been shown in some Pseudophryne populations that almost all females entering a breeding chorus can be captured76, so the logistics of achieving TGF in this species are tractable, and less complex than those for internally fertilised amniotes (reptiles, birds and mammals).

There is growing interest in Australia for exploring TGF for threatened species16, as well as investment in genomic resources that could aid in targeting adaptive traits77. Our results demonstrate that the outcomes of TGF in P. guentheri depend on the particular combination of source and recipient population, although surprisingly in one reciprocal cross this depended on the origin of the specific gametes. Further work is needed to clarify whether this result was due to the introduction of pre-adapted alleles, heterosis, mitochondrial/genomic interactions, polyploidy, or as yet unrecognised processes. However, the strong hybrid vigour and increased desiccation tolerance in AB crosses is promising, particularly considering that the parental populations are genetically divergent (FST 0.196).

Notably, toadlets in the Pseudophryne genus include Critically Endangered species (e.g., northern and southern Corroboree frogs), where genetic augmentation to improve resistance to the chyrid fungus (i.e., a form of TGF), is being considered30,78. Coincidentally, these species were crossed in a genetic study in the late 1980s79, and hybrids (i.e., P. pengilleyi x P. corroboree) had high embryonic survival (~85%)—as did the more successful crosses in our study—and better survival to hatching and metamorphosis than intra-population crosses, suggestive of genetic rescue26. These and several other threatened amphibian species are subject to captive breeding programmes and efforts to improve the capacity to generate, harvest and store gametes80,81. Given that application of TGF in these species will require both a reliable source of adults, and a supply of viable eggs and sperm, we are well positioned to initiate laboratory trials that target the expression of traits that could enhance survival of wild populations as climates become increasingly stressful.

Our results also highlight risks of TGF, as evident by apparent outbreeding depression in some long-distance crosses at levels that suggest reproductive isolation. As the effects we observed depended on the direction of the cross, we expect the outcomes of TGF will be difficult to predict theoretically. This point is especially pertinent considering that strong outbreeding depression has been shown in population crosses of a congener (P. bibronii)30, while in another congener (P. coriacea) the observation that females preferentially mate with related males was explained as a mechanism to avoid outbreeding depression82. Consequently, as highlighted in a recent review15, empirical tests of TGF in model species (as was demonstrated here), and the monitoring of long-term consequences, are essential. Otherwise, managers have few tools at their disposal to enhance the adaptive potential of populations and species threatened by climate change.

Methods

Ethics

All animal procedures were approved by the University of Western Australia’s (UWA) Animal Ethics Committee (permit number RA/3/100/1510), and the research was conducted under license 08-000560-1 from the Western Australian Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions.

Study species and population collections

Female Pseudophryne guentheri deposit large clutches of eggs that are fertilised externally, and embryos develop in terrestrial locations (burrows, depressions under cover) until suspending development at Gosner83 stages 26–2838,82. Larvae are cued to hatch by flooding, and develop aquatically thereafter, reaching metamorphosis in around three months84. The winter rainfalls that promote breeding in this species have declined markedly in recent decades (19% reduction since the 1970s)85,86,87, and are projected to further decline by up to 30% by 209085. Additionally, many P. guentheri populations are now isolated due to extensive clearing of habitat88,89, and significant declines in genetic diversity (expected heterozygosity and allelic richness) associated with repeated drought have been revealed through genomic analysis39.

Reliable in vitro fertilisation techniques developed for this species38,90 provided an opportunity to employ a highly tractable framework to examine the outcomes of TGF. We collected adult P. guentheri from four geographically separated breeding sites, situated at two latitudes, in May and June 2017 (Table 1). Sites spanned a ~460 mm annual rainfall gradient, with site A receiving the most rain per year and site D receiving the least (Table 1 and Fig. 1). Pseudophryne guentheri collected from breeding populations at each site show variation in desiccation tolerance, with adults and embryos from site A being the most sensitive to dry conditions37. Population genetic analysis39 has demonstrated high levels of inbreeding in all populations (Table 1), and genetic differentiation among P. guentheri populations is high (overall FST = 0.186), which suggests low levels of contemporary dispersal. P. guentheri from sites A and B form distinct genetic clusters39, indicating low historical gene flow despite their close proximity (100 km), whereas P. guentheri from sites C and D show admixture, but are genetically distinct from populations A and B39.

In total, 15–16 calling males from each population were collected by hand and in pit-fall traps. Gravid females were more difficult to collect due to their cryptic behaviours, and so sampling was restricted to 5–13 females from each of three sites (A, B and C; Table 1). All frogs were temporarily housed in small (4.4 L) plastic terraria containing moist sphagnum moss, and transported to the University of Western Australia within two days of collection. There, frogs were fed a diet of pinhead crickets and kept in a controlled-temperature room at 16 °C with an 11/13 h light/dark photoperiod to mimic winter conditions.

Breeding design and in vitro fertilisations

Egg clutches of each female were divided equally into four groups, and fertilised with sperm from males originating from each of the four populations, resulting in one pure and three hybrid crosses. To control for potential parental compatibility (i.e., specific pairwise male-by-female) effects on offspring fitness38,71, a sperm mixture, containing sperm from five random males from the appropriate population, was used to fertilise the eggs of each female in each population91.

Sperm was obtained from testes macerates after euthanizing males via ventral immersion in < 0.03% benzocaine solution, followed by double pithing. Sperm was stored on ice in 25–458 μL (adjusted according to the weight of the testes) standard amphibian ringer (SAR; 113 mM NaCl, 2 mM KCl, 1.35 mM CaCl2). This buffer allows storage of sperm for extended periods (days–weeks) without substantial declines in motility92,93. Sperm concentrations were measured using an improved Neubauer haemocytometer (Hirschmann Laborgeräte, Eberstadt, Germany) and sperm suspensions were diluted with 1:1 SAR to 100 sperm per μL.

Upon arrival at the laboratory, females were gently squeezed to determine whether ovulation had occurred. Approximately 35% of females had ovulated naturally while in transit and their eggs were gently stripped. For the remaining females, ovulation was induced via two subcutaneous injections of the hormone LHRHa over the course of two days37,90. Approximately 10 h after the second injection, eggs were gently stripped from each female. In all instances, freshly stripped eggs were moistened with SAR and distributed equally among four small petri dishes. A standardised number of sperm from five random males collected at each site was pipetted onto one edge of each petri dish, mixed gently with the pipette tip, and then activated with a pre-calculated volume of 1:4 SAR solution38. This resulted in eggs from all females in the experiment being fertilised from males collected from sites A, B, C and D. Each dish was then manually agitated for 20 s to promote fertilisation. After 15 min, eggs were temporarily submerged in water, backlit and photographed using a digital imaging camera (Leica DFC320) attached to a light microscope (Leica MZ7.5) at 6.3 Χ magnification. These images were used to measure the ovum diameter of 50 randomly selected eggs from each female, using ImageJ software94. Fertilisation success was initially scored one h after mixing eggs and sperm by counting eggs that had rotated (Gosner83 Stage 1). However, eggs from populations A and B took substantially longer to show signs of fertilisation when mixed with sperm from populations C and D. We therefore scored fertilisation success a second time, six hours after sperm and eggs were mixed.

Incubation treatments

Fertilised eggs from each cross were reared on sandy loam soil at two water potentials (ψ): a wet soil (ψ = −10 kPa) and dry soil (ψ = −400 kPa). The soil was previously collected from a separate P. guentheri breeding site, and the soil water potentials represented a range found in natural nest sites38. Embryo incubation and soil preparation were performed as described in Rudin-Bitterli et al.37. Briefly, soil was oven-dried at 80 °C for 24 h, distributed into small containers and rewetted with an appropriate mass of deionised water using a water-retention curve previously determined for the soil sample. The water content of the soil (g/g/ of oven dry soil) was approximately 50% in the wet treatment, and 21% in the dry treatment, and containers were sealed with a lid after wetting. Fertilised eggs from each cross were selected at random and distributed onto soils within 7–9 h of fertilisation. Small plastic rings (nylon plumbing olives, 12 mm in diameter) were labelled and placed around eggs to identify individual crosses. Sealed containers were then placed in incubators set at 16 ± 0.5 °C, and embryos were monitored every two days. Any dead eggs were removed and discarded.

Response variables

Putative fitness from within- and between-population crosses, reared in dry and wet rearing environments, was assessed at hatching. At 33 days after fertilisation (when embryos were approximately at Gosner83 Stage 26), hatching was induced by placing embryos individually in small test tubes containing 2 mL of deionised water38. Embryos were then monitored at least every 30 min until hatching, defined as when an individual completely escaped their egg capsule. Embryonic survival was recorded for each family as the percentage of fertilised eggs that hatched.

Swimming performance was recorded 6–12 h after hatching on a subset of hatchlings (N = 633 across all within and between-population crosses). For this purpose, individual hatchlings were placed in a petri dish (diameter = 150 mm) containing water 10 mm deep. After an initial acclimation period of 1 min, the tail of each hatchling was nudged with a glass cannula to elicit a burst swimming response. A video camera (Canon PowerShot G16, recording at 60 fps) installed 300 mm above the petri dish was used to film three burst swimming responses for each hatchling, and their movement was later tracked and analysed using EthoVision v8.5 software95. EthoVision enabled the quantification of the following swimming parameters: maximum velocity (cm s−1), mean velocity (cm s−1) and total distance moved (cm). We also recorded mean meander (deg cm−1), a measure of the straightness of the swimming response, as dry rearing environments can lead to asymmetrically shaped hatchlings37,38 that swim in a more circular motion. A hatchling was considered to be moving when it exceeded 0.45 cm s−1. As each video recording contained three burst swimming responses with periods of no movement in between them, EthoVision only analysed frames in which a hatchling moved faster than 0.45 cm s−1 (consequently merging the three swimming responses for each hatchling). Immediately following the swimming performance trials, hatchlings were euthanized in <0.03% benzocaine and preserved in 10% neutral buffered formalin.

Wet masses of preserved hatchlings were recorded to the nearest 0.001 g after blotting on tissue. Hatchlings were then photographed in lateral view (while submerged in water to minimise refraction) using a digital imaging camera (Leica DFC320) attached to a light microscope (Leica MZ7.5) at x 6.3 magnification. These images were used to score malformations for each hatchling and to determine their developmental stage83 by examining the hind limb buds.

Statistics and reproducibility

For each trait measured, sample sizes varied between 630 and 2973 offspring created from pure and mixed sources (Tables S1, S2). All analyses were performed in R version 3.4.3 (R Development Core Team 2017). Linear mixed-effects models (with restricted maximum-likelihood methods; REML) were run using the lme4 package96 to compare offspring traits from pure and hybrid crosses. In these models, treatment, female (population) origin, male (population) origin and all interactions (female origin-by-male origin, female origin-by-treatment, male origin-by-treatment, female origin-by-male origin-by-treatment) were considered as fixed factors. We checked for overdispersion in our models using the ‘overdisp_fun’ function proposed by Bolker et al.97. Only one trait, embryonic survival, was overdispersed, which if uncontrolled can lead to biased parameter estimates. To account for this overdispersion, we included an observation-level random effect (where each data point in our analysis receives a unique level of random effect) when analysing this trait98. As the eggs from each female were subjected to a split-clutch design, the term for dam (i.e., individual female ID) was added as a random effect to account for the use of individual females across multiple fertilisation events. We also included ovum size as a covariate in all analyses to control for possible maternal effects arising from different patterns of egg provisioning among females38. The significance of the fixed effects was evaluated using Wald chi-squared tests.

Embryonic survival and hatchling malformation data were binomial variables and thus a generalised-linear mixed-effects model (GLMM) with a logit-link function was used for the analysis of these traits. In these models we included treatment, female (population) origin, male (population) origin and all interactions (see above) as fixed effects. As above, dam ID was treated as a random effect and ovum size was added as a covariate to control for possible maternal effects38. The significance of the fixed effects was evaluated using Wald Z-tests.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

Data files99 supporting the findings of this study are available in Dryad with the identifier https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.6m905qg09.

Code availability

R code99 used to analyse data are available in Dryad with the identifier https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.6m905qg09.

References

  1. Lande, R. & Shannon, S. The role of genetic variation in adaptation and population persistence in a changing environment. Evolution 50, 434–437 (1996).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Barrett, R. D. & Schluter, D. Adaptation from standing genetic variation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23, 38–44 (2008).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Young, A., Boyle, T. & Brown, T. The population genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation for plants. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11, 413–418 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cushman, S. A. Effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on amphibians: a review and prospectus. Biol. Conserv. 128, 231–240 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Opdam, P. & Wascher, D. Climate change meets habitat fragmentation: linking landscape and biogeographical scale levels in research and conservation. Biol. Conserv. 117, 285–297 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Broadhurst, L. M. et al. Seed supply for broadscale restoration: maximizing evolutionary potential. Evol. Appl. 1, 587–597 (2008).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Vitt, P., Havens, K., Kramer, A. T., Sollenberger, D. & Yates, E. Assisted migration of plants: changes in latitudes, changes in attitudes. Biol. Conserv. 143, 18–27 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Aitken, S. N. & Bemmels, J. B. Time to get moving: assisted gene flow of forest trees. Evol. Appl. 9, 271–290 (2016).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Evans, B. J. et al. Speciation over the edge: gene flow among non-human primate species across a formidable biogeographic barrier. R. Soc. Open Sci. 4, 170351 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Weeks, A. R. et al. Assessing the benefits and risks of translocations in changing environments: a genetic perspective. Evol. Appl. 4, 709–725 (2011).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pavlova, A. et al. Severe consequences of habitat fragmentation on genetic diversity of an endangered Australian freshwater fish: a call for assisted gene flow. Evol. Appl. 10, 531–550 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Aitken, S. N. & Whitlock, M. C. Assisted gene flow to facilitate local adaptation to climate change. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 44, 367–388 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rajpurohit, S. & Nedved, O. Clinal variation in fitness related traits in tropical drosophilids of the Indian subcontinent. J. Therm. Biol. 38, 345–354 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kawecki, T. J. & Ebert, D. Conceptual issues in local adaptation. Ecol. Lett. 7, 1225–1241 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kottler, E. J., Dickman, E. E., Sexton, J. P., Emery, N. C. & Franks, S. J. Draining the swamp hypothesis: little evidence that gene flow reduces fitness at range edges. Trends Ecol. Evol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2021.02.004 (2021).

  16. Kelly, E. & Phillips, B. L. Targeted gene flow for conservation. Conserv. Biol. 30, 259–267 (2016).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Macdonald, S. L., Llewelyn, J., Moritz, C. & Phillips, B. L. Peripheral isolates as sources of adaptive diversity under climate change. Front. Ecol. Evol. 5, 88 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Edmands, S. Between a rock and a hard place: evaluating the relative risks of inbreeding and outbreeding for conservation and management. Mol. Ecol. 16, 463–475 (2007).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Edmands, S. Heterosis and outbreeding depression in interpopulation crosses spanning a wide range of divergence. Evolution 53, 1757–1768 (1999).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Frankham, R. et al. Predicting the probability of outbreeding depression. Conserv. Biol. 25, 465–475 (2011).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Whiteley, A. R., Fitzpatrick, S. W., Funk, W. C. & Tallmon, D. A. Genetic rescue to the rescue. Trends Ecol. Evol. 30, 42–49 (2015).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Schierup, M. H. & Christiansen, F. B. Inbreeding depression and outbreeding depression in plants. Heredity 77, 461–468 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bjorkman, A. D., Vellend, M., Frei, E. R. & Henry, G. H. Climate adaptation is not enough: warming does not facilitate success of southern tundra plant populations in the high Arctic. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 1540–1551 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Frankham, R. Where are we in conservation genetics and where do we need to go? Conserv. Genet. 11, 661–663 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tallmon, D. A., Luikart, G. & Waples, R. S. The alluring simplicity and complex reality of genetic rescue. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19, 489–496 (2004).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Weeks, A. R. et al. Genetic rescue increases fitness and aids rapid recovery of an endangered marsupial population. Nat. Commun. 8, 1071 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Le Cam, S., Perrier, C., Besnard, A.-L., Bernatchez, L. & Evanno, G. Genetic and phenotypic changes in an Atlantic salmon population supplemented with non-local individuals: a longitudinal study over 21 years. Proc. Roy. Soc. B-Biol. Sci. 282, 20142765 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Fitzpatrick, S. W. et al. Gene flow from an adaptively divergent source causes rescue through genetic and demographic factors in two wild populations of Trinidadian guppies. Evol. Appl. 9, 879–891 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Robinson, Z. L. et al. Experimental test of genetic rescue in isolated populations of brook trout. Mol. Ecol. 26, 4418–4433 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Byrne, P. G. & Silla, A. J. An experimental test of the genetic consequences of population augmentation in an amphibian. Conserv. Sci. Pract. 2, e194 (2020).

  31. Stuart, S. N. et al. Status and trends of amphibian declines and extinctions worldwide. Science 306, 1783–1786 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Urban, M. C., Richardson, J. L. & Freidenfelds, N. A. Plasticity and genetic adaptation mediate amphibian and reptile responses to climate change. Evol. Appl. 7, 88–103 (2014).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Carey, C. & Alexander, M. A. Climate change and amphibian declines: is there a link? Divers. Distrib. 9, 111–121 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Parmesan, C. & Yohe, G. A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 421, 37–42 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Pounds, J. A. et al. Widespread amphibian extinctions from epidemic disease driven by global warming. Nature 439, 161–167 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Thomas, C. D. et al. Extinction risk from climate change. Nature 427, 145 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Rudin-Bitterli, T. S., Evans, J. P. & Mitchell, N. J. Geographic variation in adult and embryonic desiccation tolerance in a terrestrial-breeding frog. Evolution 74, 1186–1199 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Eads, A., Mitchell, N. J. & Evans, J. Patterns of genetic variation in desiccation tolerance in embryos of the terrestrial-breeding frog, Pseudophryne guentheri. Evolution 66, 2865–2877 (2012).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Cummins, D., Kennington, W. J., Rudin‐Bitterli, T. & Mitchell, N. J. A genome‐wide search for local adaptation in a terrestrial‐breeding frog reveals vulnerability to climate change. Glob. Change Biol. 25, 3151–3162 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Bureau of Meteorology. Climate Data Online, http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/data/ (2020).

  41. Turelli, M. & Moyle, L. C. Asymmetric postmating isolation: Darwin’s corollary to Haldane’s rule. Genetics 176, 1059–1088 (2007).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Dobzhansky, T. Studies on hybrid sterility. II. Localization of sterility factors in Drosophila pseudoobscura hybrids. Genetics 21, 113 (1936).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Muller, H. J. Isolating mechanisms, evolution and temperature. Biol. Symp. 6, 71–125 (1942).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Orr, H. A. The population genetics of speciation: the evolution of hybrid incompatibilities. Genetics 139, 1805–1813 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Arntzen, J. W., Jehle, R., Bardakci, F., Burke, T. & Wallis, G. P. Asymmetric viability of reciprocal-cross hybrids between crested and marbled newts (Trituris cristatus and Trituris marmoratus). Evolution 63, 1191–1202 (2009).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Lee-Yaw, J. A., Jacobs, C. G. C. & Irwin, D. E. Individual performance in relation to cytonuclear discordance in a northern contact zone between long-toed salamander (Ambystoma macrodactylum) lineages. Mol. Ecol. 23, 4590–4602 (2014).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Sanchez, S. et al. Within-colony spatial segregation leads to foraging behaviour variation in a seabird. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 606, 215–230 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Sasa, M. M., Chippindale, P. T. & Johnson, N. A. Patterns of postzygotic isolation in frogs. Evolution 52, 1811–1820 (1998).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Sánchez‐Guillén, R., Córdoba‐Aguilar, A., Cordero‐Rivera, A. & Wellenreuther, M. Genetic divergence predicts reproductive isolation in damselflies. J. Evol. Biol. 27, 76–87 (2014).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Coyne, J. A. & Orr, H. A. Patterns of speciation in Drosophila. Evolution 43, 362–381 (1989).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Kelemen, L. & Moritz, C. Comparative phylogeography of a sibling pair of rainforest Drosophila species (Drosophila serrata and D. birchii). Evolution 53, 1306–1311 (1999).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Hercus, M. J. & Hoffmann, A. A. Desiccation resistance in interspecific Drosophila crosses: genetic interactions and trait correlations. Genetics 151, 1493–1502 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Rudin-Bitterli, T. S., Mitchell, N. J. & Evans, J. P. Extensive geographical variation in testes size and ejaculate traits in a terrestrial-breeding frog. Biol. Lett. 16, 20200411 (2020).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Shaver, J., Barch, S. & Shivers, C. Tissue-specificity of frog egg-jelly antigens. J. Exp. Zool. 151, 95–103 (1962).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Bradford, D. F. & Seymour, R. S. Influence of environmental PO2 on embryonic oxygen consumption, rate of development, and hatching in the frog, Pseudophryne bibroni. Physiol. Zool. 61, 475–482 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Seymour, R. S., Geiser, F. & Bradford, D. F. Metabolic cost of development in terrestrial frog eggs (Pseudophryne bibronii). Physiol. Zool. 64, 688–696 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Warkentin, K. M. Adaptive plasticity in hatching age: a response to predation risk trade-offs. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 92, 3507–3510 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Webb, P. Effect of body form and response threshold on the vulnerability of four species of teleost prey attacked by largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 43, 763–771 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Watkins, T. B. Predator-mediated selection on burst swimming performance in tadpoles of the Pacific tree frog, Pseudacris regilla. Physiol. Zool. 69, 154–167 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Wilson, R. & Franklin, C. Thermal acclimation of locomotor performance in tadpoles of the frog Limnodynastes peronii. J. Comp. Physiol. B 169, 445–451 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Teplitsky, C. et al. Escape behaviour and ultimate causes of specific induced defences in an anuran tadpole. J. Evol. Biol. 18, 180–190 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Walker, J., Ghalambor, C., Griset, O., McKenney, D. & Reznick, D. Do faster starts increase the probability of evading predators? Funct. Ecol. 19, 808–815 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Langerhans, R. B. Morphology, performance, fitness: functional insight into a post-Pleistocene radiation of mosquitofish. Biol. Lett. 5, 488–491 (2009).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Plowman, M. C., Grbac-lvankovic, S., Martin, J., Hopfer, S. M. & Sunderman, F. W. Jr Malformations persist after metamorphosis of Xenopus laevis tadpoles exposed to Ni2+, Co2+, or Cd2+ in FETAX assays. Teratog. Carcinog. Mutagen. 14, 135–144 (1994).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Lynch, M. & Walsh, B. Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Vol. 1 (Sinauer Sunderland, MA, 1998).

  66. Remington, D. L. & O’Malley, D. M. Whole-genome characterization of embryonic stage inbreeding depression in a selfed loblolly pine family. Genetics 155, 337–348 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Lynch, M. The genetic interpretation of inbreeding depression and outbreeding depression. Evolution 45, 622–629 (1991).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Armbruster, P., Bradshaw, W. E., Steiner, A. L. & Holzapfel, C. M. Evolutionary responses to environmental stress by the pitcher-plant mosquito, Wyeomyia smithii. Heredity 83, 509–519 (1999).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Marr, A. B., Keller, L. F. & Arcese, P. Heterosis and outbreeding depression in descendants of natural immigrants to an inbred population of song sparrows (Melospiza melodia). Evolution 56, 131–142 (2002).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Marshall, T. & Spalton, J. Simultaneous inbreeding and outbreeding depression in reintroduced Arabian oryx. Anim. Conserv. 3, 241–248 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Rudin-Bitterli, T. S., Mitchell, N. J. & Evans, J. P. Environmental stress increases the magnitude of nonadditive genetic variation in offspring fitness in the frog Crinia georgiana. Am. Nat. 192, 461–478 (2018).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Drummond, E., Short, E. & Clancy, D. Mitonuclear gene X environment effects on lifespan and health: How common, how big? Mitochondrion 49, 12–18 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Morales, H. E. et al. Concordant divergence of mitogenomes and a mitonuclear gene cluster in bird lineages inhabiting different climates. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 1258–1267 (2018).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Schmid, M., Evans, B. J. & Bogart, J. P. Polyploidy in amphibia. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 145, 315–330 (2015).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Silla, A. J. Artificial fertilisation in a terrestrial toadlet (Pseudophryne guentheri): effect of medium osmolality, sperm concentration and gamete storage. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 25, 1134–1141 (2013).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Phillip, G. B. & Keogh, J. S. Extreme sequential polyandry insures against nest failure in a frog. Proc. Roy. Soc. B-Biol. Sci. 276, 115–120 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Brandies, P., Peel, E., Hogg, C. J. & Belov, K. The value of reference genomes in the conservation of threatened species. Genes 10, 846 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Scheele, B. C. et al. Interventions for reducing extinction risk in chytridiomycosis‐threatened amphibians. Conserv. Biol. 28, 1195–1205 (2014).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Osborne, W. S. & Norman, J. A. Conservation genetics of Corroboree frogs, Psuedophryne corroboree (Anura: Myobatrachidae): population subdivision and genetic divergence. Aust. J. Zool. 39, 285–297 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Browne, R. K. et al. Sperm collection and storage for the sustainable management of amphibian biodiversity. Theriogenology 133, 187–200 (2019).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Silla, A. J. & Byrne, P. G. Hormone-induced ovulation and artificial fertilisation in four terrestrial-breeding anurans. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. https://doi.org/10.1071/RD20243 (2021).

  82. O’Brien, D. M., Keogh, J. S., Silla, A. J. & Byrne, P. G. Female choice for related males in wild red-backed toadlets (Pseudophryne coriacea). Behav. Ecol. 30, 928–937 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Gosner, K. L. A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification. Herpetologica 16, 183–190 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  84. Anstis, M. Tadpoles and Frogs of Australia. (New Holland Publishers, 2013).

  85. CSIRO, and Bureau of Meteorology. State of the Climate 2018 (CSIRO Publishing, 2018).

  86. Andrich, M. A. & Imberger, J. The effect of land clearing on rainfall and fresh water resources in Western Australia: a multi-functional sustainability analysis. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol. 20, 549–563 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Raut, B. A., Jakob, C. & Reeder, M. J. Rainfall changes over southwestern Australia and their relationship to the Southern Annular Mode and ENSO. J. Clim. 27, 5801–5814 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Arnold, G. in Greenhouse: Planning for Climate Change (ed. Pearman, G. I.) 375–386 (CSIRO Publishing, 1988).

  89. Hobbs, R. J. Effects of landscape fragmentation on ecosystem processes in the Western Australian wheatbelt. Biol. Conserv. 64, 193–201 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Silla, A. J. Effect of priming injections of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone on spermiation and ovulation in Gϋnther’s toadlet, Pseudophryne guentheri. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 9, 68 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Lymbery, R. A., Kennington, W. J. & Evans, J. P. Multivariate sexual selection on ejaculate traits under sperm competition. Am. Nat. 192, 94–104 (2018).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Browne, R. K., Clulow, J. & Mahony, M. Short-term storage of cane toad (Bufo marinus) gametes. Reproduction 121, 167–173 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Kouba, A. J., Vance, C. K., Frommeyer, M. A. & Roth, T. L. Structural and functional aspects of Bufo americanus spermatozoa: effects of inactivation and reactivation. J. Exp. Zool. A. Comp. Exp. Biol. 295, 172–182 (2003).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Abràmoff, M. D., Magalhães, P. J. & Ram, S. J. Image processing with Image. J. Biophotonics Int. 11, 36–42 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  95. Noldus, L. P., Spink, A. J. & Tegelenbosch, R. A. EthoVision: a versatile video tracking system for automation of behavioral experiments. Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comput. 33, 398–414 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67, 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 (2014).

  97. Bolker, B. M. et al. Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24, 127–135 (2009).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Harrison, X. A. Using observation-level random effects to model overdispersion in count data in ecology and evolution. PeerJ 2, e616 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Rudin-Bitterli, T. S., Evans, J. P. & Mitchell, N. J. Fitness consequences of targeted gene flow to counter impacts of drying climates on terrestrial-breeding frogs. Data sets. https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.6m905qg09 (2021).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Brighton Downing for assistance in the field and laboratory, and Deanne Cummins, Blair Bentley, Jon-Paul Emery and Emily Hoffmann for their help collecting adults from breeding choruses. Corne van der Linden provided the P. guentheri images in Fig. 1. This research was funded by the ANZ Holsworth Wildlife Research Endowment, the Australian Government’s National Environmental Science Programme through the Threatened Species Recovery Hub and the School of Biological Sciences at the University of Western Australia, T. Rudin-Bitterli was supported by the International Postgraduate Research Scholarship and the C.F.H. & E.A. Jenkins Postgraduate Research Scholarship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

T.R.-B., N.M. and J.E. conceived the study. T.R.-B. carried out the fieldwork and laboratory experiments, analysed the data, and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. N.M. produced the figures. All authors contributed to writing and revising the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicola J. Mitchell.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Communications Biology thanks Robert Jehle and the other, anonymous, reviewer for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editors: Caitlin Karniski. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rudin-Bitterli, T.S., Evans, J.P. & Mitchell, N.J. Fitness consequences of targeted gene flow to counter impacts of drying climates on terrestrial-breeding frogs. Commun Biol 4, 1195 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-021-02695-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-021-02695-w

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing