Introduction

Missing persons have long been a subject of interest in crime and deviant-behavior studies (Huey and Ferguson, 2022; Morewitz, 2016). Much attention, however, has been focused on missing children and youth, which has involved reflections on victimizations of parental and peer abuse (Morewitz, 2016) or child abduction and trafficking (Randone and Thomas, 2022; Stevenson and Thomas, 2018; Xin and Cai, 2019). Indeed, the “missing person” entry in Wikipedia covers content exclusively on missing children (Wikipedia contributors, 2022). By contrast, only a handful of studies examined the psychological and cognitive health of missing adults, based primarily on data from police records (Bonny et al. 2016; Huey and Ferguson, 2022; O’Brien et al. 2022) or newspaper reports (Lai et al. 2012; Rowe and Bennett, 2003; Rowe et al. 2011). This study focused on a seldom studied group: the missing older adults (MOAs). Our purpose was to outline the prevalence and patterns of mental and cognitive impairments in this distinct group, using a large digital dataset.

The focus on MOAs is of great relevance in the context of the widespread and continuing acceleration of population aging worldwide. The global percentage of older adults over 60 years will almost double, increasing from 12% in 2015 to 22% in 2050 (World Health Organization, 2020). Consequently, growing efforts have been devoted to specific segments within the older population, such as those with physical disabilities (Van Houtven et al. 2020), in nursing homes (Freedman and Spillman, 2014), or the oldest old (Zeng et al. 2017). However, MOAs as a distinct group have received little direct attention. Although most missing persons will return or be found within just a few days (Lissemore et al. 2019; Newiss and Webb, 1999), a sudden disappearance of a loved one inevitably incurs a grave psychological toll on the family members involved. Also, older adults with missing experience face high risks of repeated missing (Bantry-White and Montgomery, 2015; McShane et al. 1998). Taken together, the MOAs represent an important intersection of missingness and old age (Biehal et al. 2003; Ruiz-Rizzo et al. 2022).

Despite the lack of discussions in prior research, MOAs are quite noticeable in scale, particularly in countries with a large older population. Consider Japan and China as two examples. Japan has the world’s most aging population. In 2021, over 79 thousand missing persons were reported, and over 27 percent of them were older adults (National Police Agency (Japan), 2022). China had 264 million older adults aged 60 and above in 2020, accounting for 18.7% of the population. In 2015, almost 500 thousand older adults were reported missing across the country (Xiong, 2017).

The mental and cognitive issues among older adults have gained increasing prominence: one study reported a global prevalence of depression in older persons approaching 30% (Hu et al. 2022), and the share of this group affected by mild cognitive impairment ranged from 6.7 % for ages 60–64 to 25.2% for ages 80–84 (Petersen et al. 2018). Overall levels of mental and cognitive issues may be higher if both diagnostic and nondiagnostic instruments are used, as well as severe and mild symptoms taken into account. The healthcare for older adults with mental and cognitive impairments represents a grave challenge to the caregiving family members (Victor et al. 2021) and the public health systems (Brookmeyer et al. 2007; Morewitz and Goldstein, 2007; Nichols et al. 2019).

However, there remains a lack of research with explicit attention to the health profiles of MOAs. In gerontological and geriatric research, many studies have narrowly discussed the getting-lost issues among older adults with dementia (Bantry-White and Montgomery, 2015; Bowen et al. 2011; Lai et al. 2012; McShane et al. 1998; Murata et al. 2021), without further attention to those with cognitive impairments other than dementia or mental problems. Also, the target population of these studies was actually cognitively impaired older adults, not the distinct group of MOAs.

Methodologically, current research related to MOAs is largely limited by data. The use of police data, for example, is almost always limited in terms of generalizations of research findings, as researchers could only gain access to archived reports from a small number of local police forces (Alison et al. 2001; Bantry-White and Montgomery, 2015; O’Brien et al. 2022). Studies based on missing reports in newspapers also struggled with the self-selection of news reports with “newsworthiness” (Jeanis and Powers, 2017; Jewkes and Linnemann, 2017) which undermined the representativeness of their findings.

The development of digital technologies has dramatically revolutionized the means of locating missing persons (Ceccato and Petersson, 2022; Jeanis et al. 2021; Morewitz, 2016; Solymosi et al. 2021). Accordingly, large volumes of digital data have been generated, making it possible for a population-based description of the health profiles of MOAs. In this study, we retrieved a large dataset from the Toutiao Alert, an extensive missing-person alert platform operated by a social media company in China. The data allowed us to illustrate the prevalence of mental and cognitive impairments of MOAs at the national level and to delineate further the group-specific variation in health impairments by gender, age, region, and year of missing. This work is essential given the accelerated aging and the concerning coverage of missing persons in many societies. The findings may serve as a reference point for comparison in future studies.

Research design and methods

Data Source

Data were from the Toutiao Alert project, which was initiated by Toutiao, one of China’s largest mobile platforms for aggregating and distributing news and information. Toutiao was launched by the China-based company ByteDance in 2012, and as of 2021, the Toutiao app has been China’s most popular news app, amassing over 332 million monthly active users. Most Toutiao users are young and well-educated: users under age 30 make up 90 percent of Toutiao’s user base. To the best of our knowledge, our dataset collected from the Toutiao Alert platform contains one of the largest samples of MOAs currently available in Chinese society, and represents a significant improvement over previous data sources such as newspapers or local police reports.

In general, the creation and distribution of a missing person appeal follow several steps. First, after collecting and verifying a missing person report, the Toutiao Alert team posted the appeal on their platform. Meanwhile, it pushed notifications to the Toutiao users about information related to the missing person, disclosing the name, gender, age, photographs, date of getting lost, location of getting lost, and other notable features such as clothing, mental state, and cognitive status. Backed up by the location-based notification-pushing techniques, a missing person appeal can be sent to all Toutiao users within a specified radius and, occasionally, may reach all the users within a city. The vast-and-young user base facilitates high visibility of the published missing person appeals. Figure 1 shows a typical format of a missing person appeal illustrated on a mobile phone. Once a missing person was found, the missingness status was updated, and the missing person’s name, photos, and related contact information were removed. However, all other information remained on the platform from which we collected our dataset in this study.

Fig. 1: A typical structure of a missing person appeal on the Toutiao Alert platform.
figure 1

It shows a typical format of a missing person appeal illustrated on a mobile phone. Once a missing person was found, the missingness status was updated, and the missing person’s name, photos, and related contact information were removed. However, all other information remained on the platform from which we collected our dataset in this study.

Employing a web-crawler application, we retrieved all the missing person appeals published on the platform between the start of 2017 and the end of 2021, yielding a total of 62812 missing person reports. Of these, individuals under age 60 (n = 29908) and with missing values on age (n = 19) were excluded. As a result, a sample of 32885 MOAs was analyzed.

Coding and derived variables

Mental and cognitive impairments were derived and coded from the “Characteristics” section in a missing person appeal (Fig. 1). On the right side of Fig. 1, we listed several real examples that appeared in our dataset. In the first example, we can observe the phrase “moderate level of dementia”, which can be easily identified and coded as cognitive impairment. In the second example, words like “severe insomnia”, “depression”, and “suicidal tendencies” all point to mental impairments. In the third example, the health status of the missing person was not straightforward but implicitly mentioned. Specifically, we considered the phrases “slurred speech” and “glazed eyes” as symptoms of cognitive impairments. Finally, if neither mental nor cognitive impairments were mentioned, we considered the missing person as “normal”. We created a long list of keywords to identify whether each elderly missing person in our dataset was “normal”, “mentally impaired”, “cognitively impaired”, or “both”. Two of the authors did the coding independently and then worked together to reach an agreement on the unmatched cases.

Table 1 shows part of the keywords used to detect mental and cognitive impairments. Concerning the coding result, only 112 missing persons were described with words indicating both mental and cognitive impairments. Therefore, we coded a coexistence of mental and cognitive impairments simply as cognitively impaired. As such, our outcome variable in the analysis had three categories: 1 = “normal”, 2 = “mental impairment”, and 3 = “cognitive impairment”.

Table 1 Selected keywords used to detect mental and cognitive impairments.

We focused on four key independent variables in outlining the distributive patterns of mental and cognitive impairments. Two are related to demographic characteristics: gender (0 = “male”, 1 = “female”) and age group (“60–64”, “65–69”, “70–74”, “75–79”, and “80+”). Two are related to spatiotemporal characteristics: the region of the missing (1 = “Eastern China”, 2 = “Central China”, 3 = “Western China”, 4 = “Northeastern China”) and the year of missing (“2017,” “2018,” “2019,” “2020,” “2021”).

Several other variables available in the data were included in our regression models as control variables, including the body height of an elderly missing person (1 = “less than 150 cm”, 2 = “150–159 cm”, 3 = “160–169 cm”, 4 = “170–179 cm”, 5 = “180+ cm”, and 6 = “missing”), whether an elderly missing person had been reported to the police (0 = “no”, 1 = “yes”), the time duration between the date of the missingness of an elderly missing person and the date of the missingness-alert on the Toutiao Alert platform (1 = “less than 24 h”, 2 = “1–3 days”, 3 = “3 days or more”), and a dummy variable indicating the updated missing status of an elderly missing person (0 = “already found”, 1 = “still missing”).

Statistical analysis

We performed univariate analysis for the overall levels of mental and cognitive impairments in our dataset. We then performed bivariate analysis to see how the mental and cognitive impairments were spread across gender, age, region, and year of missing. Cross-tabulations with chi-square tests were used to illustrate the bivariate-association patterns and statistical significance. We further used regression analysis to assess the associations while adjusting for other covariates. We used the multinomial logit model because our outcome variable had three categories. Coefficients in odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals were reported. All p-values were based on two-tailed tests and considered to indicate statistical significance if less than 0.05.

Results

Table 2 presents descriptive statistics for our sample. First, the sample was unevenly distributed by gender: for every four women, there were about six men. This is consistent with the conventional wisdom that men are more likely than women to go missing in the adult population (Bantry-White and Montgomery, 2015; Bonny et al. 2016). Across age groups, the number of MOAs varied somewhat: 16.0% were aged 60–64, 19.6% were aged 65–69, 19.9% were aged 70–74, 16.9% were aged 75–79, and notably, 27.6% were aged 80 and over. The proportion of MOAs appears to be much higher than in the older population overall (Lei et al. 2012; Lei et al. 2014).

Table 2 Descriptive statistics (N = 32885).

In addition to demographic features, Table 2 also presents the spatial and temporal distribution of the MOAs. Regarding the geographical distributions, we found that Eastern China, the most developed region in the country, accounted for 42.8% of the MOAs in our sample. In comparison, 14.7 and 7.6% of the MOAs were reported missing in Western China and Northeastern China, two regions roughly with the lowest development levels. The remaining 31.9% of the MOAs were from Central China, which ranks behind Eastern China yet ahead of Western and Northeastern China in socio-economic development. Over the period 2017–2021, the number of MOAs increased first and then declined. It increased from 4723 (14.4%) in 2017 to a peak of 8931 (27.2%) in 2019, and then decreased to 6610 (20.1%) in 2020 and further down to 5501 (16.7%) in 2021. One possible explanation for such an inverted V-shaped pattern may be related to the profound impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, which broke out initially in late 2019 and then continued to the present. A similar pattern was observed in a recent study with UK data (O’Brien et al. 2022).

Table 2 reports the overall prevalence of mental and cognitive impairments: 10.6% were reported to have mental impairments, 41.5% were reported to have cognitive impairments, and the remaining 47.9% were reported as “normal.” These percentages reveal a preponderance of cognitive impairments among the MOAs in China.

Table 3 shows bivariate associations, splitting the mental and cognitive impairment distribution by gender, age, region, and year of missing. Compared to men, women had a higher prevalence of mental impairments (14.6 vs. 8.0%) and cognitive impairments (43.3 vs. 40.3%). Compared to younger-age groups, older-age groups had lower levels of mental impairments but higher levels of cognitive impairments. Notably, among those aged 80 and over, 47.7% were reported to have certain kinds of cognitive issues, whereas mental problems were hardly ever reported (2.5%). Concerning regional comparisons, the prevalence of cognitive impairments was 44.3% in Central China, 43.7% in Western China, 40.9% in Eastern China, and 27.8% in Northeastern China. The regional variation in mental impairments was relatively small, ranging between 8.6 and 11.1%. Notably, the mental and cognitive impairment levels were comparably low in Northeastern China. Temporally, the prevalence of mental and cognitive impairments declined initially but rebounded in recent years.

Table 3 Distribution of health status across gender, age, region and year.

Table 4 presents multinomial logit regression results. Women exhibited higher levels of mental and cognitive impairments: ceteris paribus, their odds of having mental impairments were 157.1% higher (OR = 2.571, 95% CI = 2.340–2.825), and the odds of having cognitive impairments were 30.3% (OR = 1.303, 95% CI = 1.230–1.382) higher. The increase in age was associated with lower levels of mental impairments but higher levels of cognitive impairments. The odds of mental impairments among those aged 80+ were 10.9% (OR = 0.109, 95% CI = 0.094–0.127) of the odds among those aged 60–64. In contrast, the odds of cognitive impairments among those aged 80+ were 160.5% (OR = 1.605, 95% CI = 1.482–1.739) of the odds among those aged 60–64. Across regions, MOAs in Northeastern China had a lower likelihood of mental impairments (OR = 0.602, 95% CI = 0.512–0.706) and cognitive impairments (OR = 0.471, 95% CI = 0.427–0.521).

Table 4 Multinomial logit models predicting mental and cognitive impairments.

Between 2017 and 2021, the likelihood of mental or cognitive impairments first declined but then substantially increased until the most recent year. The odds of mental impairments decreased by 29.1% in 2018 (OR = 0.709, 95% CI = 0.621–0.810) and by 30.5% in 2019 (OR = 0.695, 95% CI = 0.609–0.795), but significantly increased by 60.7% in 2021 (OR = 1.607, 95% CI = 1.397–1.850), in comparison to the odds of mental impairments in 2017. The odds of cognitive impairments decreased by 18.8% in 2018 (OR = 0.812, 95% CI = 0.749–0.883), by 18.0% in 2019 (OR = 0.820, 95% CI = 0.754–0.890), by 14.6% in 2020 (OR = 0.854, 95% CI = 0.781–0.933), but then significantly increased by 51.0% in 2021 (OR = 1.510, 95% CI = 1.376–1.656). The group-specific predicted probabilities presented in Fig. 2 are derived from the logit estimates while setting the other covariates at their means. Taken together, our bivariate and multiple regression analyses have yielded consistent results regarding the mental and cognitive impairment distributions across gender, age, region, and year of missingness.

Fig. 2: Predicted probabilities of having mental and cognitive impairments.
figure 2

The group-specific predicted probabilities presented are derived from the logit estimates while setting the other covariates at their means.

Discussion and implications

The MOAs represent an essential intersection between old age and missingness, and their health and well-being deserve more public and policy attention considering the accelerated aging and concerning coverage of missing persons in many societies. We retrieved a large dataset of MOAs (n = 32,885) from an online platform in China to outline the prevalence and patterns of mental and cognitive impairments in this distinct vulnerable group.

In our sample, 52.1% were reported to have mental or cognitive impairments, with cognitive impairments being reported more frequently than mental impairments (41.5 vs. 10.6%). An early study in the UK similarly found that over half of the MOAs aged 60 and over had dementia or mental health problems (Biehal et al. 2003). Prior research has also noticed the particular manifestation of cognitive impairments (Biehal et al. 2003; Xiong, 2017). On the other hand, the relatively lower share of mental impairments may not necessarily indicate fewer psychological challenges. It is likely that when mental and cognitive issues coexist in an elderly missing person, the cognitive problems are more often stressed in a missing-person report. Indeed, depressed older adults tend to display more cognitive symptoms than affective symptoms as they age further (Fiske et al. 2009).

We further assessed whether and how the prevalence of mental and cognitive impairments among MOAs varied by gender, age, region, and year of missing. Our bivariate analysis and multiple regression models yielded consistent results. First, women were more likely than men to have mental and cognitive impairments, even though men usually outnumber women in missing-person reports (Bantry-White and Montgomery, 2015; Bonny et al. 2016). This finding is consistent with prior documents about the whole elderly population that women are more inclined to suffer from mental and cognitive issues (Lei et al. 2012; Lei et al. 2014). Hence, women’s mental and cognitive vulnerabilities in the MOAs may warrant more public and policy attention.

Second, cohort age was associated with the likelihood of mental and cognitive impairments, but notably in opposite directions. The positive link between age and cognitive impairment in our sample echoed prior research on the general older population (Lei et al. 2012; Petersen et al. 2018), but the observed adverse age gradient in mental impairments was just contrary to previous studies on general older adults (Lei et al. 2014).

Third, significant disparities existed across broad regions of China. We found lower mental and cognitive impairment levels in Northeastern China compared to other parts of China. There are several possible explanations for these regional differences. One possibility is that the region of Northeastern China included an outlier province, which has led us to a false conclusion. To test this, we presented scatter plots for mental and cognitive impairment prevalence at both the province and regional levels (see Supplementary Fig. S1). The left part of Supplementary Fig. S1 corresponds to the plot that includes information on 31 provinces. The three provinces belonging to Northeastern China (Heilongjiang, Jilin, and Liaoning) are clustered at the lower left corner of the plot, indicating that relatively low levels of mental and cognitive impairments among MOAs were commonplace in Northeastern China as a whole. This point is well captured by the right-side plot that includes information on four regions. Hence, our finding here was not due to a misclassification of regions.

Another possibility is related to economic development or population structure. To test this, we reran our regression models with the inclusion of a set of province-level characteristics such as GDP per capita, percentage of the urban population, number of older adults over 65, and percentage of older adults over 65. Most of the coefficients for these factors, although statistically significant, probably due to our large sample size, did not suggest meaningful, practical differences. We also compared the goodness-of-fit of these models with our original model with the four-category region variable, and the results are reported in Supplementary Table S1. Our original model with a broader-region variable seems better because it has a lower Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) value and a lower Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) value. We thus argue that the regional differences in mental and cognitive impairments among MOAs in Northeastern China are not closely linked to economic and demographic backgrounds.

It is also a possibility that people in Northeastern China may tend to underreport mental and cognitive impairment due to their more conservative cultural norms. We already know that the stigma of mental illness and cognitive disabilities has prevailed in traditional Chinese culture (Kong et al. 2022; Lei et al. 2014). In particular, the word “dementia” has long been phrased as “Chi Dai” in Chinese, which literally means stupid and dumb (“Chi” means stupid, and “Dai” means dumb). Despite the recent advocation of alternative Chinese terms for dementia, the derogatory term “Chi Dai” continues to dominate public discourse. Such a cultural explanation can be specifically examined in further research based on better data.

Lastly, from 2017 to 2021, the prevalence of mental and cognitive impairments among MOAs went down at first but then substantially increased in the most recent year (i.e., 2021). The initial decrease in mental and cognitive impairments may be attributed to both the increased public awareness of MOAs and the popularity of the Toutiao Alert platform, which may increase the exposure of MOAs (see Table 2), especially those without mental and cognitive problems, and thus decrease the overall prevalence of mental and cognitive problems in our dataset. The later increase in mental and cognitive impairments may be partly due to the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic. It has been suggested that the plethora of lockdown restrictions in response to the COVID-19 pandemic may profoundly affect the proportion of different types of missing persons reported (O’Brien et al. 2022). Possibly due to China’s persistent and strict social lockdowns, the number of MOAs declined continuously after 2019 (see Table 2). In addition, recent research suggests that social isolation (Li et al. 2022), information overload (Liu et al. 2022), and disruption of routine medical care (Wong et al. 2020) may have contributed to an increased risk of mental and cognitive impairments among older adults during the COVID-19 period. Thus, the proportion of MOA with mental and cognitive impairments increased after 2019, in contrast to the decline in previous years. With the further progress of the pandemic, it is necessary to monitor whether and how the different health dimensions among MOAs may change in the current and post-COVID-19 situation.

This study had several limitations. First, the findings might not be convincingly generalized to the entire missing older population in China. Our results were based on a dataset collected from an online platform, which may have selection issues due to selective uploading or intentional deletion. We thus cannot be confident that our sample will sufficiently represent the overall target population, despite its large sample size (n = 32885). Still, the results in the current study can serve as a benchmark for future studies using data from other social media platforms or sample surveys.

Second, due to the nature of our data, we adopted the reported characteristics of a missing person to identify the actual existence of any cognitive or mental impairments. This reported outcome may not fit well with outcomes of interest to domain-specific experts. For instance, researchers have developed standardized scales to measure mild cognitive impairment (Petersen et al. 2018) and some other scales to assess depressive symptoms for older adults (Andresen et al. 1994; Radloff, 1977). In constructing our measure of cognitive and mental health status, however, we had to rely on the limited data accessed from a pre-existing online platform initially designed for non-research purposes. Indeed, information incompleteness is one of the key features of digital data (Salganik, 2019). Future research may seek to improve the structure of a missing-alert system, hopefully through cooperation with online service providers, to better capture and collect more detailed and accurate health information about a missing person.

Third, we are aware that the patterns of mental and cognitive impairments among MOAs in China have been outlined at the risk of oversimplification. For example, the time trends were presented on a yearly basis. It might be desirable to investigate the seasonal or monthly patterns of mental and cognitive status of MOAs in future research. Furthermore, the regional patterns presented in the current study were based on the East-Central-West-Northeast categorization, without taking into account the possible rural-urban differences. We already know that among the general elderly population in China, urban residents have both higher levels of cognitive ability (Lei et al. 2012) and lower levels of depressive symptoms (Lei et al. 2014). It would be a great addition to the current study if we could further illustrate the urban-rural differences in the prevalence and patterns of mental and cognitive impairment among missing older adults. Unfortunately, our data were limited in providing a reliable urban-rural measure in this regard.

Despite the limitations, the findings of this study could have practical value in raising scholarly and public awareness of the mental and cognitive health status of the MOAs as a special segment of the elderly population. Moreover, the return of the MOAs is not the end of the story. Some of the returned persons would face a high risk of repeated missing. In this regard, the successful prevention of repeat missing incidents requires a better understanding of these MOAs’ mental and cognitive health conditions. Furthermore, return-home interviews may be conducted by police or charitable organizations. We were aware that in some places of the UK, a return-home interview and a safe-and-well check are carried out by trained professionals from charity organizations (All Party Parliamentary Group (APPG), 2018). However, existing professional practice for missing adults remains to rely on good will instead of good data (All Party Parliamentary Group (APPG), 2018). This study represents one of the first attempts to provide cumulative empirical evidence.

Conclusion

Using data from public missing-person appeals on a large social media platform (i.e., Toutiao Alert), our results showed that over half of the MOAs in our sample were reported to have mental and cognitive problems, and cognitive issues were more likely than mental problems to be reported. Moreover, the prevalence of mental and cognitive impairments differed by gender and age of the MOAs and by region and year of missing. The findings of this study could have practical value in raising scholarly and public awareness of the mental and cognitive health status of the MOAs as a special segment of the expanding elderly population. Since the health and well-being of MOAs is still an under-explored area of research, we call for more systematic examinations of this issue in other social contexts or through a cross-national framework.