Introduction

Biological invasion of agricultural ecosystems has increased due to global factors, such as weak economies, international trade, climate change, poor regulatory regimes, and environmental concerns1,2,3,4. These factors have compounded the impact of invasive species on sustainable agriculture, food security, and biodiversity conservation5,6,7. The African citrus triozid (ACT), Trioza erytreae (Del Guercio; Hemiptera: Triozidae), is an invasive alien pest of all citrus species. Trioza erytreae feeds on about 18 non-citrus host plants, all belonging to the family Rutaceae8. The pest spreads locally through natural dispersal up to about 1.5 km per week9, but long distance spread mainly has occurred as a result of trade in infested plants. It is listed as an A1 quarantine pest by the European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization, the Caribbean Plant Protection Commission and Organismo Internacional Regional de Sanidad Agropecuaria10. Trioza erytreae was first reported on citrus in 1922 in the South African regions of the Eastern Cape and Stellenbosch11. Over 28 countries from Europe, Middle East, and Africa, have reported Trioza erytreae10. In these areas, T. erytreae poses a threat to their citriculture12.

Trioza erytreae induces direct damage to hosts through its feeding activities. The symptomatic shoots show pit-like galls and secretion of honeydew, which have been associated with a reduction of yield and productivity of the affected plants13. Direct damage to hosts is important, but of more significant concern is its ability to vector the phloem-limited bacterium “Candidatus Liberibacter africanus”, implicated in incurable African Huanglongbing (HLB) or citrus greening disease, which represents a substantial setback to the citrus industry wherever it occurs14.

Climate is one of the most important factors influencing the occurrence, geographical distribution, population dynamics, and natural enemies of pests on a global scale15,16,17. Warmer temperatures may cause insect some species to grow faster, leading to a greater reproductive capacity, which can increase the number of generations produced in a season and the rate of population growth18. Global warming will alter the incidence and damage caused by crop pests19. Temperature changes also may lead to pest outbreaks20. Studies have shown that T. erytreae prefers cool and moist climates, because extreme temperatures are detrimental to all stages21,22. However, in hot and dry climates or areas that experience high temperatures and steady rain, the pest can grow, but with difficulty23,24. It also is believed that T. erytreae would be able to survive summer conditions in the Southeastern part of the Iberian Peninsula21,25,26. Therefore, understanding the areas at risk of invasion will be helpful for policy formulation, prevention measures, and regulatory plans. Insect pests respond differently to climate change, demonstrating their uniqueness and variances in environmental adaptation27,28.

Species distribution modeling (SDM) [also known as ecological niche modeling, habitat modeling, predictive habitat distribution modeling, and range mapping] employs presence records and environmental variables, builds the model using a machine learning algorithm, forecasts species ecological demands, and then projects the analyzed results over time and space to estimate possible potential distribution of the species29,30. Species distribution modeling is an important tool in quantitative ecology31 and has been used to predict suitable areas for several invasive pests, including Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae)32, Acrosternum spp. (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae)33, and Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner, 1808) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)34.

Species distribution modeling is achieved using either correlative SDMs or mechanistic SDMs. Correlative SDMs use multiple regression techniques to simulate the observed distribution of a species as a function of regionally referenced climatic predictor variables, whereas mechanistic SDMs use physiological data about a species to identify the range of environmental conditions in which the species can survive35,36. In correlative SDMs, several models are used, including bioclimatic modeling (BIOCLIM), Boosted Regression Trees (BRT), generalized linear models (GLM), DOMAIN, and maximum entropy (MaxEnt). In contrast, the climate change experiment (CLIMEX) is a semi-mechanistic model that has been used to predict suitable areas of invasive pests37,38.

Recent research on T. erytreae has focused mainly on its biology21,22,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47, management strategies48,49,50, host range42, morphometry51, distribution52, and citrus greening disease12,47,53. Predicting the potential geographical distribution of T. erytreae has been limited to a local scale54,55, whereas global forecasting of risk areas under current and future climate change scenarios using the CLIMEX model, is generally lacking. Yet, knowledge of the global regions at risk of invasion is required for international collaboration in developing biosecurity and preventive measures to slow down the spread of the pest. In the present study, we combined geospatial and physiological data of T. erytreae to predict the global distribution using the CLIMEX model.

Materials and methods

Occurrence records of Trioza erytreae

We obtained the presence records of T. erytreae through field surveys in Kenya, Tanzania, and Uganda, from March 2016 to February 2018. The sampling methods involved the collection of infested shoots, sampling of development stages and adults, deployment of yellow sticky card traps, and sampling of symptomatic shoots. We obtained the GPS coordinates using Garmin eTrex® 32×. Data also were obtained from scientific literature13,21,22,42,43,44,45,47,48,49,51,52,56,57,58,59,60,61), utilizing online databases, such as Web of Science, Science Direct, Google, Google Scholar, PubMed, and MEDLINE. The keywords for global data search on the pest included Trioza erytreae, African citrus triozid, African citrus psyllid, ACT, first report, citrus greening vectors, and HLB vector biology, citrus pests, psyllids, and distribution. We also downloaded additional T. erytreae data from the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF, http://www.gbif.org), Centre for Agriculture and Bioscience International (CABI, https://www.cabi.org/), and European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization (EPPO, https://gd.eppo.int/). The localities where a village was mentioned, we used Google Earth Pro (version 7.3) (https://earth.google.com) to obtain the latitudes and longitudes. Overall, 301 occurence records were obtained for the modeling. Due to CLIMEX requirements, we cleaned the data by removing duplicates, fuzzy, and neighboring records.

In addition, the duplicate records from the datasets were removed, leaving just one occurrence per grid cell (5 km). As a result, 283 documented presence records were confirmed and used for the global prediction of T. erytreae. The occurrence records used for the model are included in the supplemental material Table S1 and illustrated in Fig. 1.

Figure 1
figure 1

Known global distribution of Trioza erytreae. ESRI ArcMap 10.2.2: (https://support.esri.com/en/Products/Desktop/arcgis-desktop/arcmap/10-2-2#downloads).

CLIMEX model

The potential distribution of a species has been achieved using ecological niche models through semi-mechanistic software such as CLIMEX62. CLIMEX is a bioclimatic niche model that forecasts suitable locations based on species traits and climate variables63,64. It has been used to predict the potential distribution of various species65. CLIMEX is built on the idea that if you know where a species lives, you can estimate its tolerated climatic conditions64. As a result, it maximizes the favorable growing season for the species while minimizing the unfavorable growth season64,66. This software generates forecasts by combining specific climatic criteria generated from biological data (e.g. heat and moisture requirements) with known species distributions62,63. Thus, we created the potential distribution model for T. erytreae using CLIMEX. This software provides information on the climate suitability of species, based on stress and growth indices through the Ecoclimatic Index (IE), which is organized on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 indicates inadequate areas and 100 ideal areas with high suitability for the occurrence of the species64. ArcGIS software extracted the CLIMEX outputs and projected the suitable areas for T. erytreae in the largest citrus-producing countries, in total production.

Parameter assembly

The parameters used for the CLIMEX model are presented in Table 1. We adjusted the growth and stress indices in CLIMEX based on scientific research related to T. erytreae available in the literature. Based on the best agreement between the observed distribution and the tolerance for climatic variables, the stress indices could be adjusted and classified as satisfactory67.

Table 1 CLIMEX parameter values are used for Trioza erytreae.

Moisture index

Trioza erytreae can develop in hot and dry climates like semi-arid areas68, thus considering CLIMEX template data of “Semi-arid template,” the Soil moisture indices were defined at a lower soil moisture threshold (SM0) 0.1 and lower optimum soil moisture (SM1) 0.369. The upper optimum soil moisture (SM2) 0.7 and the upper soil moisture threshold (SM3)1.5 were adjusted to agree with the known occurrence of T. erytreae and indicate areas with excess soil moisture.

Temperature index

Eggs and the first instars of T. erytreae are highly vulnerable to desiccation, and the lower temperature threshold for the development of the juvenile stages is about 10 °C68. Furthermore, temperatures between 15 and 24 °C allowed the development of T. erytreae immature stages22. Thus, the lower temperature threshold (DV0) was set at 10 °C, the lower optimum temperature (DV1) at 15 °C. The upper optimum temperature (DV2) at 30 °C and the upper temperature threshold (DV3) were set respectively at 38 °C. These indices were adjusted to consider CLIMEX template data of “Semi-arid template” and allow agreement with the high occurrence of T. erytreae in semi-arid and arid regions.

Stress index

Cold stress

Temperature significantly affects the development of all the immature stages, with the lowest developmental temperature threshold ranging between 3 and 15 °C22. However, the temperature threshold for cold stress (TTCS) was defined as 1 °C, and the accumulation of cold stress (THCS) was set at − 0.002 week−1 to fit the pest distribution in the areas of occurrences.

Dry stress

Considering the occurrence of T. erytreae in many arid and semi-arid regions, we adjusted the dry stress limit (SMDS) to 0.05, and the dry stress accumulation rate (HDS) was set at − 0.005 week−1 like the CLIMEX template data of “Semi-arid template”.

Wet stress

Although T. erytreae populations grow with difficulty, they can also develop in climates characterized by high temperatures and frequent rain, like tropical regions68. Therefore, the wet stress parameter (SMWS) was set to 2.5, and the stress accumulation rate (HWS) was set to 0.002 week−1 based on CLIMEX Wet Tropical Template.

Heat stress

Temperatures of 32 °C or more combined with 30% relative humidity or less kill all stages of the pest68,69. Thus, considering the CLIMEX semi-arid template and ensuring the best fit of the model outputs to the T. erytreae occurrence, we set the temperature threshold for heat stress (TTHS) to 44 °C and the heat stress accumulation rate (THHS) to 0.002 week−1.

Future climatic scenarios

We used the CliMond 10′ gridded climate data to model CLIMEX since, it provides a good spatial resolution. The CliMond 10′ consists of long-term values of monthly average minimum and maximum temperature (Tmin and Tmax), precipitation (Ptotal), and relative humidity at 09:00 h (RH 09:00) and 15:00 h (RH15:00)67. The A1B and A2 SRES scenario and the global climate model (GCM) CSIRO-Mk3.0 (CS) of the Centre for Climate Research, Australia, were used to perform the modelling procedure for T. erytreae in the climate changes predicted for 2050 and 2070. The CS climate system model contains a comprehensive representation of the four major components of the climate system (atmosphere, land surface, oceans, and sea-ice), and in its current form is as comprehensive as any of the global coupled models available worldwide70.

Our study focuses on two different scenarios, a mitigation scenario (A1B) and a no mitigation scenario (A2). The CliMond database currently does not have data for Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) scenarios, much less the scenarios are foreseen for the 6th Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report that will be released now in 2021. Thus, we used the A1B and A2 SRES latest scenarios present in CliMond. According to Van Vuuren & Carter71, the key factor differentiating RCPs from the SRES is their CO2 concentration. The A2 SRES assumes an increase in CO2 concentrations by the end of the century to 846 ppm. Its best RCP equivalent is the RCP 8.5, which assumes a concentration of 936 ppm. Another difference between these two equivalent scenarios is related to the temperature increase. The predicted temperature increase for the A2 SRES is approximately 6 °C, while for the RCP 8.5 is 7 °C. Therefore, due to its best equivalence to the RCP 8.5, in this study, the A2 SRES scenario was used to model the impact of climate change on T. erytreae distribution. Likewise, SRES A1B was used in this study as a scenario more positive, with mitigation actions, equivalence to RCP 2.6.

Model verification and validation

The model was validated by comparing the output to known distributions in the South African regions of the Eastern Cape, the first report of T. erytreae on citrus11 (Fig. 2). These observations were used to evaluate our model’s reliability. Thus, through the Ecoclimatic Index (EI), the suitable areas for T. erytreae were classified as unsuitable (EI < 0), moderate suitability (0 < EI < 30), and high suitability (EI > 30)62.

Figure 2
figure 2

Detail of Known Trioza erytreae on the Ecoclimatic index (EI) map from CLIMEX prediction. ESRI ArcMap 10.2.2 (https://support.esri.com/en/Products/Desktop/arcgis-desktop/arcmap/10-2-2#downloads) and CLIMEX 4.0.0 (https://www.hearne.software/Software/CLIMEX-DYMEX/Editions).

Results

Current global potential distribution of Trioza erytreae

The potential geographical distribution of T. erytreae, is primarily found in the east and south of Africa; south, and east of Asia; north, west, south, and east of South America, and east and south coasts of Australia. Under the current climate, the Ecoclimatic Index (EI) for T. erytreae modelled using the CLIMEX model for the current climate is shown in Fig. 3. The global geographical distribution of T. erytreae is consistent with its present-day distributions. However, the model predicts new areas, such as Bostwana, Ghana, Côte D’Ivoire, Nigeria, Liberia, Somalia in Africa; the USA, Mexico, Honduras, Brazil, Bolivia, Paraguay, Uruguay, and Argentina in the Americas; Papua New Guinea and Australia in Oceania; Indonesia, China, India, Thailand, Vietnam, Cambodia, and Myanmar in Asia; Italy in Europe as suitable for the pest.

Figure 3
figure 3

The Ecoclimatic Index (EI) for Trioza erytreae is modelled using CLIMEX for the current climate. ESRI ArcMap 10.2.2 (https://support.esri.com/en/Products/Desktop/arcgis-desktop/arcmap/10-2-2#downloads) and Climex 4.0.0 (https://www.hearne.software/Software/CLIMEX-DYMEX/Editions).

Future global potential distribution of Trioza erytreae

In the SRES A1B and A2 scenarios, the changes in habitat suitability of the pest from the current time to 2070 are shown in Figs. 4 and 5. The EI for T. erytreae in the A1B scenario for the current time to 2070, in the largest citrus-producing countries, in total production (Brazil, China, and the USA), showed a suitable habitat decline for the pest (Fig. 6). The EI for T. erytreae in the A2 scenario for the current time to 2070, in the largest citrus-producing countries (Brazil, China, and the USA) (Fig. 7), shows a contraction of suitable areas. The model predicts that highly suitable areas are contered in southeastern parts of Brazil and China. In North America, there will be change of habitat suitability with most parts becoming usuitable for T. erytreae in the USA.

Figure 4
figure 4

The Ecoclimatic Index (EI) for Trioza erytreae using CLIMEX running the SRES A1B scenario for the current time (a), 2050 (b) and (c) 2070. ESRI ArcMap 10.2.2 (https://support.esri.com/en/Products/Desktop/arcgis-desktop/arcmap/10-2-2#downloads) and CLIMEX 4.0.0 (https://www.hearne.software/Software/CLIMEX-DYMEX/Editions).

Figure 5
figure 5

The Ecoclimatic Index (EI) for Trioza erytreae modelled using CLIMEX running the SRES A2 scenario for the current time (a), 2050 (b) and 2070 (c). ESRI ArcMap 10.2.2 (https://support.esri.com/en/Products/Desktop/arcgis-desktop/arcmap/10-2-2#downloads) and CLIMEX 4.0.0 (https://www.hearne.software/Software/CLIMEX-DYMEX/Editions).

Figure 6
figure 6

The Ecoclimatic Index (EI) for Trioza erytreae in A1B scenario for the current time, 2050 and 2070, respectively, in Brazil, China, and USA (the largest citrus-producing countries). ESRI ArcMap 10.2.2 (https://support.esri.com/en/Products/Desktop/arcgis-desktop/arcmap/10-2-2#downloads) and CLIMEX 4.0.0 (https://www.hearne.software/Software/CLIMEX-DYMEX/Editions).

Figure 7
figure 7

The Ecoclimatic Index (EI) for Trioza erytreae in A2 scenario for the current time, 2050 and 2070, respectively, in Brazil, China, and USA (the largest citrus-producing countries). ESRI ArcMap 10.2.2 (https://support.esri.com/en/Products/Desktop/arcgis-desktop/arcmap/10-2-2#downloads) and CLIMEX 4.0.0 (https://www.hearne.software/Software/CLIMEX-DYMEX/Editions).

Discussion

In the present study, the physiological data and some of the presence points of ACT were sourced from the scientific literature. This encourages data reuse for future research, allowing future research work to progress more efficiently and effectively72,73. Unlike the mechanistic models, the CLIMEX model uses the occurrence records of a species and its physiological stress factors to establish the potential distribution of species. The predictions are consistent with the known global T. erytreae distribution. The model predicted suitable areas in regions that were predicted earlier using different machine learning algorithms, such as MaxEnt54. Again, the prediction covered suitable areas, including the validation area, in which the data were not used to estimate the geographical distribution of the pest. Overall, of the 283 occurrence points, only one occurrence record was found in areas deemed unsuitable by the model fit, thus most of the occurrence records inside the validation area matched the CLIMEX-estimated suitable areas for T. erytreae invasion and spread.

The geographical distribution of invasive species like T. erytreae has been evaluated through SDMs, but most studies were conducted locally. For example, Kyalo et al.54, combined MaxEnt with remotely-sensed vegetation variables to predict the spatial distribution of T. erytreae in Kenya. A study by Aidoo et al.74, indicated the potential distribution of T. erytreae using bioclimatic variables and elevation datasets in Kenya using MaxEnt. A recent study predicted the expansion of T. erytreae in the Iberian Peninsula using a pest risk analysis approach55. A more recent study modeled the potentially suitable areas of T. erytreae in two European countries, Portugal and Spain using MaxEnt13. Finally, Espinosa-Zaragoza et al.48, predicted the suitable areas of T. erytreae in Mexico based on MaxEnt and only bioclimatic variables. However, none of these studies evaluated the impact of climate change on the global geographical distribution of T. erytreae, and under current and future scenarios. Moreover, results from the present study showed similar areas suitable for T. erytreae compared to the previous studies13,48,54,58,74.

Prevention of invasive alien pests is the surest way of reducing or avoiding their impact on sustainable agriculture production and food security thus prevention of biological invasion is less expensive and more manageable than post-entry management75. Therefore, it is essential to understand and assess the impact of climate change on the potential distribution and range shifts of invasive species like T. erytreae for a better biosecurity plan. The study's information may be used to develop a proactive, adaptive, and integrated invasive species management approach to curtail and prevent further spread.

In the present study, we used the CLIMEX model to predict habitat suitability for T. erytreae, and the suitable areas ranged from unsuitable (EI < 0) to high suitability (EI > 30). The model predicts an expansion of suitable areas outside reported countries in Europe (i.e., Spain and Portugal). These areas were predicted to have moderate (0 < EI < 30) to high suitability (EI > 30) for T. erytreae. The new moderately suitable regions identified by the model include Italy, Cyprus, Croatia, Greece, France, and Albania, and these countries produce citrus in Europe; thus the introduction of T. erytreae into these zones could threaten their citrus industry. To date, T. erytreae is still restricted to Spain and Portugal in Europe76. However, the pest can invade and establish in other European countries where citrus is cultivated55. This also suggests that there is a need for early detection and eradication measures to avoid the spread of this invasive alien pest across Europe. In Oceania, T. erytreae has not been reported, but our study predicts highly suitable areas, particularly in the east and coasts of Australia. If T. erytreae were to invade Australia, its establishment would be facilitated by the suitable temperate climate, especially its mild winter temperatures77,78. Therefore, continuous strict compliance of the continent biosecurity measures is required at the entry points (i.e., railway stations, harbors, airports, and lorry parks) to intercept host materials. Apart from citrus, alternative host plants belonging to the family Rutaceae, such as the curry tree, Murraya koenigii (L.) Spreng. (Bergera koenigii L.), and Clausena anisata (Willd.) Hook. f. ex Benth.,74 should be checked regularly for all stages of T. erytreae at the Australian entry points. According to an Australian Plant Biosecurity report79, there is a need to pay attention to additional types of invasion pathways, including natural spread, human travelers and their luggage, and infested machinery.

Detection and monitoring of T. erytreae using sticky traps can be of great importance to where the pest exists or is at risk of invasion. In Kenya, Aidoo et al.49, demonstrated that sticky card traps, especially the yellow ones, effectively detected field populations of T. erytreae even at low densities. Other sampling methods, such as visual observation of adults and immatures and collection of symptomatic leaves, could facilitate early detection of the pest, particularly after it has invaded new locations. In most areas, anthropogenic activities have been associated strongly with the spread of T. erytreae through movement of infested host plants. Therefore, regular visits to areas where alternate hosts are present may help early detection and monitoring.

We demonstrated that the overall potential habitat suitability for T. erytreae will decline in the future under SRES A1B and A2 scenarios compared to the current climate. The A1B and A2 SRES scenarios and the global climate model (GCM) CSIRO-Mk3.0 datasets predict a temperature increase of 2.11 °C and a precipitation loss of 14% by 210080. Previous studies have shown that temperatures above 32 °C coupled with 30% relative humidity degrees are detrimental to T. erytreae development68,69. As a result, in regions near the equator where the annual mean temperature is around 31 °C, a rise in 2.11 °C may increase T. erytreae mortality due to its climatic requirements80,81. In contrast, areas with high elevations, such as Kenya, Tanzania in East Africa, will remain suitable because the changing climate may favor the survival and distribution of the pest in those areas. The areas that will see reduction of suitable areas are primarily concentrated in countries such as India and Mexico that are expected to become much warmer. It has been demonstrated that T. erytreae prefers cool and moist climatic conditions24, so extreme temperature may cause high mortality22. On the other hand, the pest has adapted to and settled in a wide range of ecological conditions, including equatorial, arid, and warm temperate climates with varying temperatures and rainfall21. In the future, our model predicts more areas of moderate suitability (0 < EI < 30) than high (EI > 30). However, parts of the five major citrus-producing countries in the world (i.e., China, Brazil, Mexico, India, and the USA) will continue to have habitat suitability for the pest until 2070. None of these countries has reported T. erytreae76. Nevertheless, our study will guide policymakers and plant protection and regulatory services to implement quarantine and preventive measures to avoid future invasion by the pest.

Trioza erytreae and the agent it transmits (CLaf), are heat-sensitive68, and the development of symptomatic leaves varies based on temperature16. In addition, detecting the disease in leaves is problematic because ‘Ca. L. species’ are of low concentration and unevenly distributed within their host tissues82,83. The difficulty in detection may facilitate the spread of CLaf in new areas when T. erytreae is introduced through pathways, such as citrus fruit84, nursery stock (live plants)85, budwood86, fresh leaves84, and grafted trees87. Ajene et al.88 predicted habitat suitability for CLaf in several regions, including Western, Eastern, and sub-Saharan Africa in Africa; South and Central America in the Americas; and the Iberian Peninsula in Europe, Australia in Ocenia, and Cinina in Asia. Similarly, these areas were predicted to be suitable for T. erytreae, the disease's primary vector. Because these regions are suitable for both T. erytreae and CLaf, there is a need to develop proactive measures against the pest and the disease to safeguard the citrus industry79. Moreover, in areas where citrus is presently absent, our results can still guide future plans to cultivate the crop, because areas that are currently unsuitable for citrus cultivation may be suitable for its production in future.

It is important to note that there are limiting abiotic and biotic factors, such as natural enemies; entomopathogens, predators, parasitoids; human factors, urban accessibility; and host plant availability; geographical factors; vegetation, land cover, and elevation, that may limit the distribution of the pest, but were not included in the current model. Other factors that were not considered, include competition with native species, altitude, propagule pressure, gene editing, farm-level management strategies, policies, and quarantine measures. All these factors should be considered when interpreting the current study results. Kyalo et al.54 found that including remotely-sensed vegetation in a MaxEnt model improved the prediction of suitable areas of T. erytreae. Therefore, we recommend that future studies include these factors in the CLIMEX model when predicting the global suitable areas of T. erytreae.

As predicted in the current study, the suitable areas in Ghana, Côte D'Ivoire, Liberia, Bostwana, and the Mediterranean coast of North Africa, where citrus is cultivated, require plant protection and regulatory plans. Moreover, these areas need regular inspection or testing for pests, prohibition of portions of the host, a pre-entry or post-entry quarantine system, stated conditions on consignment preparation, specified treatment of the consignment, restrictions on end-use, distribution, and entry periods of the commodity are among the measures that can be implemented79. Another way to detect “Candidatus Liberibacter spp.” as early as possible is to test the insects89. This method has produced results by providing early warning about “Ca. L. asiaticus” in several places in the world89,90. As a result, a similar approach should be adopted for surveillance of T. erytreae by testing all intercepted psyllids.

Conclusion

The CLIMEX model predictions are consistent with the known historical records of T. erytreae, but suitable areas will decrease from the current time to 2070. However, T. erytreae suitable areas in some regions will remain highly suitable in the future, implying that major citrus growing countries will continue to be threatened by T. erytreae in the future. Therefore, the findings from the present study may help develop preventive and control measures against the pest, especially in regions where T. erytreae is absent.