Abstract
The incidence of type 1 diabetes (T1D) has increased, coinciding with lifestyle changes that have likely altered the gut microbiota. Dysbiosis, gut barrier dysfunction, and elevated systemic inflammation consistent with microbial antigen exposure, have been associated with T1D susceptibility and progression. A 6-week, single-arm, open-label pilot trial was conducted to investigate whether daily multi-strain probiotic supplementation could reduce this familial inflammation in 25 unaffected siblings of T1D patients. Probiotic supplementation was well-tolerated as reflected by high participant adherence and no adverse events. Community alpha and beta diversity were not altered between the pre- and post-supplement stool samplings. However, LEfSe analyses identified post-supplement enrichment of the family Lachnospiraceae, producers of the anti-inflammatory short chain fatty acid butyrate. Systemic inflammation was measured by plasma-induced transcription and quantified with a gene ontology-based composite inflammatory index (I.I.com). Post-supplement I.I.com was significantly reduced and pathway analysis predicted inhibition of numerous inflammatory mediators and activation of IL10RA. Subjects with the greatest post-supplement reduction in I.I.com exhibited significantly lower CD4+ CD45RO+ (memory):CD4+ CD45RA+ (naïve) T-cell ratios after supplementation. Post-supplement IL-12p40, IL-13, IL-15, IL-18, CCL2, and CCL24 plasma levels were significantly reduced, while post-supplement butyrate levels trended 1.4-fold higher. Probiotic supplementation may modify T1D susceptibility and progression and warrants further study.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Type 1 diabetes (T1D) arises through the immune-mediated destruction of insulin-producing pancreatic β-cells and results in dependence on life-long exogenous insulin replacement therapy. Adaptive immune responses are involved in T1D pathogenesis, as T-cells comprise a significant proportion of the islet infiltrate1, and T-cell targeted therapies delay disease progression2.
While less understood, many studies have also suggested a role for altered innate immune activity in T1D pathogenesis (reviewed in Refs.3,4). Monocytes isolated from T1D patients spontaneously secrete IL-1β and IL-6 and induce more IL-17-secreting memory T-cells, suggesting that innate immune activity may drive adaptive responses during T1D pathogenesis by expanding the effector Th17 cell population5. Transcriptomic studies of unstimulated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) drawn from individuals at high genetic risk of developing T1D have identified a type I interferon (IFN-1) signature prior to the development of islet autoantibodies6,7. Further, ex vivo whole blood stimulation with IFN-β or polyinosinic:polycytidylic acid, a synthetic dsRNA analog and activator of Toll-like receptor 3 (TLR3), has revealed an IFN-1 hyper-responsiveness in T1D patients compared to healthy controls8. Finally, independent of high-risk HLA (human leukocyte antigen) haplotypes or autoantibody status, peripheral blood mononuclear cells of T1D patients and their healthy first-degree relatives hyper-secrete cytokines (IL-1α, IFN-1, TNF-α) after stimulation with Toll-like receptor (TLR) ligands, including endotoxin and CpG oligodeoxynucleotides9,10,11. This heightened responsiveness likely contributes to an elevated baseline inflammatory state and more robust inflammatory excursions during infections that together may foster breaks in immune tolerance.
The increasing incidence of T1D in recent decades has been accompanied by a reduction in the age of onset and a lower percentage of individuals possessing high-risk HLA haplotypes12,13,14. These rapid changes cannot be explained by genetic shifts and suggest the presence of greater environmental pressure. Over this same time frame, there has been greater use of antibiotics and more widespread consumption of the low-fiber and highly processed Western diet15,16,17. Notably, the gut microbiota of modern urban humans has been found distinct from that of West African hunter-gatherers, ancient humans, and great apes18,19,20,21, exhibiting lower community diversity and lower abundances of potentially beneficial taxa, including short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) producers. Together, these changes are hypothesized to contribute to higher gut permeability, greater microbial antigen exposure, and increased systemic inflammation17. Such changes would likely have the greatest impact on those with an inherited hyper-responsiveness to innate stimuli.
Notably, gut barrier dysfunction, altered gut ultra-structure and permeability, inflammation of the duodenal mucosa, and dysbiosis are associated with human T1D22,23,24,25. Environmental exposures early in life may influence abnormal gut colonization and diabetes progression. While evidence is mixed, this possibility is supported by associations between neonatal probiotic usage and reduced islet autoimmunity in children at high genetic risk for T1D26 and associations between Cesarean birth and increased risk for T1D development27. Importantly, lactic acid bacteria belonging to the genera Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus are passed from mother to child during natural birth and are important for catabolizing milk oligosaccharides28,29,30. These taxa are also known to support intestinal barrier integrity, produce anti-inflammatory SCFA, and are often used as probiotic supplements31,32.
Using a transcription-based bioassay, we have identified an elevated innate inflammatory state that is consistent with pattern recognition receptor (PRR) activation in T1D families and the BioBreeding (BB) rat model33,34,35. This state is associated with diabetes susceptibility yet is independent of the HLA/MHC and diabetes progression. In both species, non-progression is associated with temporal induction of IL-10/TGFβ-dependent endogenous regulatory processes that override the underlying inflammatory state. In BB rats, establishment of counter-regulation coincides with the inability of viral infections to trigger T1D34,35.
Modulation of the gut microbiota in BB rats can augment immunoregulatory polarization and prevent diabetes progression36. Modulation of the gut microbiota also influences T1D progression in non-obese diabetic (NOD) mice37. NOD mice with impaired microbial sensing due to MyD88 deficiency, an adapter molecule downstream of multiple TLRs, are completely protected from diabetes38. T1D progression in rodent models appears to be fostered in part, by an exaggerated, MyD88-dependent immune response to the commensal microbiota.
While successful prevention of T1D through probiotic supplementation has been limited to rodent models, emerging studies indicate that probiotics may favorably modulate human autoimmune disease39,40,41. Safe, broadly applicable approaches are needed to reduce the risk of triggering T1D and slowing its progression. Therefore, we conducted a pilot trial to (1) assess the feasibility of successful implementation of the study protocol, and (2) investigate the impact of daily probiotic supplement on the composition of the gut microbiota, circulating anti-inflammatory SCFA, and the familial inflammatory state associated with T1D susceptibility in unaffected siblings of diabetes patients.
Results
Probiotic supplementation, compliance, and validation
Twenty-five participants were enrolled to receive a 6-week course of probiotic supplementation between April 23, 2018 and November 12, 2018. Participants were not related to each other and did not have clinical T1D. Baseline characteristics are outlined in Table 1. Participants had a mean age of 12.3 years (range 6.2–17.7 years) and were 64% female. All participants had a full sibling diagnosed with T1D and 12% also had a parent with T1D. Forty percent of participants had a high-risk HLA haplotype, defined as possession of DR3 and/or DR4 (termed high-risk siblings, HRS). Sixty percent had neither DR3 nor DR4 and are termed low-risk siblings (LRS). While 76% of participants had no diabetes autoantibodies, 8% (n = 2) had a single diabetes autoantibody and 16% (n = 4) had ≥ 2 autoantibodies. Participants were generally healthy without chronic medical problems, but 8 participants had mild atopic conditions such as eczema or seasonal allergies, for which no medications were required during the study course, and 3 participants had anxiety disorder for which they took a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor.
No adverse events were observed or reported; however, a third of participants reported poor palatability of the probiotic powder. Based on the number of returned probiotic sachets at the post-supplementation visit, the overall adherence was 92% (median 99%, range 52–100%).
The composition of the probiotic supplement provided to participants was analyzed through sequencing the V4 region of the 16S rDNA gene and was confirmed to consist of Bifidobacteria, Lactobacillus, and Streptococcus genera (data not shown).
Alterations to gut microbiota
For the 25 participants, composition of the fecal microbiota was assessed through sequencing of the V4 region of the bacterial 16S rDNA gene, before and after the 6-week supplement period. A total of 1,030,825 quality reads were obtained from the 50 samples; among these 1,029,905 (99.91%) were mapped to at least the family level. The sequences were collapsed into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) based upon sequence identity ≥ 99%; these represented a total of 13 phyla, 53 families, and 173 unique OTUs. In terms of alpha (within sample) diversity, neither the Shannon index nor OTU richness were significantly different between the pre- and post-supplement samplings (Fig. 1A). Further, beta (between sample) diversity was not significantly different between the pre- and post-supplement communities when assessed by the Bray–Curtis dissimilarity index. Principal Coordinate Analysis showed that most of the pre-/post-probiotic sample pairs grouped with each other in a manner independent of HLA haplotype (Fig. 1B). After adjustment for a False Discovery Rate (FDR) of 5%, none of the OTUs exhibited significantly different abundances when comparing the pre- and post-supplement samplings. In addition to considering differences between HRS and LRS, we did not detect any sex or auto-antibody-dependent community differences within or between the pre- and post-supplement samplings (data not shown).
We identified differentiating features between the pre- and post-supplement communities using the Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA)-based LEfSe approach (Fig. 1C)42. A total of 11 differentiating features were associated with the pre-supplement samples that possessed an absolute LDA score > 2; these included Mogibacteriaceae, Porphyromonadaceae, and Peptostreptococcaceae family members. A total of 5 differentiating features were associated with the post-supplement samples (LDA score > 2). Among these were Bifidobacteriaceae and Lactobacillaceae family members; these taxa were among those identified in the probiotic supplement, further supporting participant adherence. Lachnospiraceae (LDA score = 3.1, p = 0.025) was also identified by the post-supplement LEfSe analysis. Notably, this family (and Veillonellaceae, LDA score = 1.9, p = 0.024) has been reported to show decreased abundance among T1D progressors43.
Probiotic supplement and systemic inflammation in siblings of T1D probands
Plasma-induced transcription, utilizing samples drawn immediately before and after the 6-week supplement period, was used to assess how probiotics altered the familial inflammatory state that we have previously described in T1D families versus unrelated healthy controls (uHC)33. The subjects here were compared to our previous analysis where we identified 1,374 differentially induced probe sets among four cross-sectional cohorts: recent onset T1D (ROT1D) patients, uHC lacking family history of autoimmunity, autoantibody-negative HRS and LRS33. To quantify immune activity, we previously developed a gene ontology-based composite inflammatory index (I.I.com)33 based on the 1,374 transcripts in which I.I.com is determined by calculating the ratio between the mean intensity of induced transcripts annotated as being “inflammatory” versus those annotated as being “regulatory”. High scores reflect greater inflammatory bias, while low scores reflect greater regulatory bias. On average, I.I.com was significantly reduced after 6-weeks of probiotic supplementation (p = 0.017; Fig. 2A,B), indicating that the familial inflammatory state was lowered. No significant differences in I.I.com based upon sex, HLA haplotype, autoantibody status, age or BMI z-score were detected among the participants pre- or post-supplement, and the degree to which I.I.com was lowered after supplement was not dependent on these variables.
After probiotic supplement, 16/25 (64%) subjects experienced a reduction in I.I.com of greater than 5%, while an increase of more than 5% was observed in 4/25 (16%) subjects (Fig. 2C). The four non-responders were not distinct from the remainder of the cohort by sex, age, HLA, autoantibody status, BMI z-score, or adherence to the probiotic. After exclusion of these four non-responders from the analyses, 422/1,374 (30.7%, χ2 p < 10E−4) of the transcripts used to calculate I.I.com were differentially induced between the pre- and post-supplement samplings at a false discovery rate < 20% (Supplemental Table 1). Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) was then used to identify candidate regulators of these 422 probe sets (Fig. 2D). Consistent with a reduction in systemic inflammation, IL17A, lipopolysaccharide, NFkB, IL1B, and TNF were found significantly inhibited (Z-scores ≤ − 2.0) while IL10RA was found significantly activated (Z-score = 2.0) after probiotic supplementation. Well annotated inflammatory and immunoregulatory transcripts associated with these mediators are illustrated in Fig. 2E. In individuals with either high- or low-risk HLA haplotypes, the plasma-induced signatures showed a lower inflammatory bias post-supplement, exhibited reduced induction of inflammatory transcripts (CXCL6, CXCL16, CCR1, IL6ST, IRAK3, TREM1, S100A8, S100A9, TNFRSF10D) and increased induction of IL-10-dependent regulatory transcripts (CBLB, PIAS1, PTPN4, INPP5D, SMURF1) resulting in signatures that exhibited higher correlation to that of uHC (Fig. 2E).
The relationship between dietary fiber intake and I.I. com
Participants did not receive nutritional education or instruction to alter their normal dietary patterns. No subjects reported fiber or nutritional supplement use immediately before or during the study. Twenty-four of 25 participants completed the Block 2014 Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ), a validated dietary self-assessment tool44,45. On average, participants reported daily dietary consumption of 1722 kcal (range 742–2744 kcal/day), 69 g fat (range 24–119 g/day), and 18 g of dietary fiber (range 5–37 g/day). Given the potential role of dietary fiber on the microbiota and as a prebiotic that may enhance probiotic function46, daily dietary fiber intake was specifically assessed in the context of guidelines from the Institutes of Medicine (IOM), which states there should be 14 g of dietary fiber per 1000 kcal/day47. It is known that dietary fiber intake is inadequate in most American children and < 10% achieve the IOM’s target48. In this study, 13% reached or exceeded the IOM target. To assess whether dietary fiber intake was associated with the degree of the probiotic-induced change in systemic inflammation, Pearson correlation coefficients were used to examine the linear relationships between variables in the 24 participants who completed the Block 2014 FFQ. For these analyses and to account for variable caloric intake across a pediatric cohort, dietary fiber was standardized as a percentage of the IOM targets achieved. A near significant relationship between dietary fiber intake and the percent change in I.I.com was observed in that greater reported dietary fiber intake was correlated with greater reductions in I.I.com (Pearson correlation coefficient − 0.401; p = 0.052). This suggests that dietary fiber may enhance probiotic-induced reductions in systemic inflammation. There was no association between change in I.I.com and daily consumption of several other dietary metrics of potential interest such as the grams of soluble fiber/day or volume of daily legumes, whole grains, or yogurt consumption.
Direct measurement of cytokines, chemokines and SCFAs
We have previously measured and reported significantly elevated plasma levels of IL-12p40, IL-1α, CCL2, CCL3, and CCL4 in RO T1D patients, HRS, and LRS relative to uHC33. Here, we examined levels of 69 analytes in the plasma of the probiotic supplemented participants. Many proinflammatory mediators exhibited modest reductions after the supplement period (Fig. 3A); statistically significant reductions were observed for IL12p40 (− 16.4%), IL-13 (− 31.1%), IL-15 (− 30.3%), IL-18 (− 8.1%), IL-28A (− 6.7%), CCL2 (− 8.6%), CCL21/C6kine (− 6.4%), and CCL24/eotaxin 2 (− 10.4%) (Fig. 3B–I). Only TRAIL, which has both pro- and anti-inflammatory activities, showed a significant increase post-supplement (+ 8.1%) (Fig. 3J). The differences in cytokine levels were not driven by subjects that had experienced seroconversion, as the altered IL-13, IL-15, IL-18, and TRAIL levels remained significant after exclusion of the four participants possessing ≥ 2 autoantibodies.
SCFAs are the end-products of microbial fermentation of dietary fiber. Importantly, in Tregs, SCFAs activate free fatty acid receptor 2 (FFAR2) inducing differentiation and activation49,50. In monocytes, SCFAs activate FFAR2 and FFAR3 inducing a profound anti-inflammatory effect51. For these reasons, we investigated the impact of probiotic supplementation on major circulating SCFAs. While levels of acetate, propionate, valerate, and hexanoate were unchanged, on average butyrate levels trended 1.4-fold higher after probiotic supplementation (0.94 ± 1.46 μM versus 1.32 ± 1.34 μM, p = 0.11, paired t-test, 1-tailed). It has been reported that children with at least two diabetes-associated autoantibodies exhibit a dysbiotic state, characterized by a low abundance of lactate-producing and butyrate-producing species52. Notably, after exclusion of the four participants possessing ≥ 2 autoantibodies the increase in butyrate levels post-supplement became statistically significant (0.79 ± 1.22 μM versus 1.36 ± 1.41 μM and p = 0.045, paired t-test, 1-tailed) (Fig. 3K).
CD4 T cell phenotypes before and after supplement
In Ref.33, we determined that T1D progressors do not exhibit increases in circulating activated Tregs over time. Notably, this contrasted with longitudinally studied HRS non-progressors, where we observed robust temporal increases in activated Treg, as well as a significant negative relationship between I.I.com and the percentage of activated Treg33. Given these prior observations and the known effect of SCFAs on Treg differentiation and activation49,50, we analyzed the abundances of CD4+/CD45RA-/FOXP3high activated Treg among total Treg in cryopreserved PBMC samples collected prior to and immediately after the probiotic supplement period. Significant changes in the abundances of Treg or activated Treg were not detected (data not shown) in the 14 subjects (HRS n = 3, LRS n = 11 and 2Ab + n = 2) for which samples were available. Since most participants showed a reduction in I.I.com post-supplement, we also investigated whether those subjects experiencing the greatest reduction in I.I.com experienced the greatest increase in activated Treg among total Treg. Again, a significant relationship was not detected. However, the analysis revealed that probiotic treatment may influence the relative abundances of naïve and memory CD4+ T-cells (Fig. 4). Notably, those subjects with the greatest reductions in I.I.com after supplementation showed a decreasing trend in the percent CD4+ CD45RO+ memory T-cells post-supplement (Fig. 4B, Pearson’s correlation = 0.51, p = 0.061), and an increasing trend in the percent CD4+ CD45RA+ naïve T-cells post-supplement (Fig. 4C, Pearson’s correlation = 0.50, p = 0.060), and a significantly lower CD4+ CD45RO+: CD4+ CD45RA+ T-cell ratio after supplementation (Fig. 4D, Pearson’s correlation = 0.67, p = 0.008). It has been established that CD45RA expression decreases as a function of age with a concomitant increase in CD45RO+ memory T-cells53, possibly reflecting reductions in thymic output and the acquisition of antigen exposures over time. Notably, the CD45RO+ memory T-cell population is expanded in children with recently diagnosed T1D compared to healthy controls54. Here, the probiotic-associated decrease in the ratio of memory : naïve CD4+ cells is consistent with lowering of systemic inflammation.
Discussion
Previous studies have identified an elevated inflammatory state in T1D families that is consistent with PRR activation3,4. In this pilot study, we provided a multi-strain probiotic to nondiabetic siblings of T1D patients with the goal of lowering this innate state. Overall, probiotic supplement was found safe and well-tolerated, as reflected by the lack of adverse events and high participant adherence rate. Immunological studies were conducted that together indicated that systemic inflammation was modestly reduced.
Plasma-induced transcription and targeted follow-up studies have successfully measured changes in immune activity associated with T1D progression. In previous longitudinal studies of T1D progressors, we observed temporal increases in I.I.com, reflecting increases in inflammatory bias33. Conversely, in longitudinal studies of non-progressors, especially those possessing high-risk HLA haplotypes, we observed temporal decreases in I.I.com, indicative of IL-10/TGFβ mediated regulatory polarization33. This overriding regulated state was associated with increases in peripheral abundances of activated regulatory T-cells (Treg, CD4+/CD45RA−/FoxP3high), a subpopulation possessing high suppressive capacity33. We have also found that newly diagnosed T1D patients are highly heterogeneous in terms of inflammatory activity55. Notably, those with a lower I.I.com near onset possess higher peripheral abundances of activated Treg and experience a slower rate of C-peptide decline during the post-onset period55. It is known that exposure of Tregs to inflammatory inputs impairs suppressive capacity by promoting FOXP3 proteasomal degradation56,57, while microbiome-derived SCFAs induce Treg differentiation49,50. Given that (1) dysbiosis and intestinal hyper-permeability have been associated with T1D22,23,24,25; and (2) modulation of the gut microbiota normalizes the endogenous innate state, lowers plasma TLR4 ligand levels, and delays/prevents diabetes in BB rats36, we reasoned that probiotic supplementation may lower systemic inflammation in unaffected siblings of T1D patients. While significant increases in circulating activated Treg were not observed, a modest but significant reduction in I.I.com, our primary outcome, was observed after the six-week supplement, and reductions in I.I.com significantly correlated with reductions in the CD4+ CD45RO+ (memory) : CD4+ CD45RA+ (naïve) T-helper cell ratio (p = 0.008). While not significant (p = 0.052), the greatest reductions in I.I.com also correlated with the highest percentages of dietary fiber per daily caloric intake, suggesting that fiber or other prebiotics may represent a means of augmenting probiotic effect. The Block 2014 Food Frequency Questionnaire is not specifically tailored to quantify fermentable dietary fibers, and this raises the possibility of unrecognized relationships between diet and probiotic effect. Since completion of this trial, there have been efforts to develop and validate dietary indices that relate host diet to microbiome58,59 and these should be leveraged in future studies.
The post-supplement transcriptional signature was consistent with reduced NF-κB activation. This pathway can be triggered by cytokines, including IFN-1 and IL-1 which have been implicated in the pathogenesis of T1D and other autoimmune diseases60,61, as well as through PRR ligand exposure. Because plasma-induced signatures of T1D family members are consistent with PRR ligation33, and the plasma collected after probiotic supplement exhibited signatures consistent with reduced lipopolysaccharide exposure, we indirectly examined lipopolysaccharide levels of pre- and post-supplement plasma with reporter cells that express TLR4 and an NF-κB-inducible secreted alkaline phosphatase36. While TLR4 activation levels were 19.2% lower in the post- (96.1 ± 36.6 pg/ml; mean ± standard error) versus pre-supplement (119.0 ± 22.3 pg/ml) samples, this difference did not reach significance (p = 0.13) with the number of subjects studied (data not shown).
In this study we determined that probiotic supplementation did not overtly alter the gut microbiota. A limitation of this analysis was that stool samples for the second visit were collected up to a week after the last probiotic supplement. A greater change in the gut microbiota may have been observed if stool samples were collected and analyzed while the participants were still taking the supplement. Regardless, LEfSe analyses revealed enrichment of several bacterial families in the post-supplement stool samples. Among these were Lachnospiraceae, important anaerobic butyrate producers that are reported to induce Treg-suppression of the colonic inflammatory response62, as well as Lactobacillaceae and Bifidobacteriaceae, some of which directly produce butyrate, propionate, and/or acetate (e.g. L. acidophilus and B. longum, constituents of the supplement) that also promote the growth of butyrogenic taxa through bacterial cross-feeding63. Notably we found butyrate levels trended higher in the participants after probiotic supplement. Consistent with lowered plasma cytokine levels, butyrate supplementation has been reported to reduce responsiveness to LPS, coinciding with lowered lipopolysaccharide-induced IL-6 and IL-12 secretion in intestinal macrophages, promoting tolerance towards the intestinal microbiota64. In vitro studies have shown that butyrate may improve intestinal barrier function by upregulating expression of tight junction proteins65 and butyrate-yielding diets protect NOD mice from T1D66. However, de Groot et al.67, reported that butyrate supplement in longstanding T1D patients did not alter innate or adaptive immune cell phenotypes or alter any clinical metrics in long-standing T1D patients. It must be mentioned that these authors did not measure circulating butyrate levels, and that the effects observed in our study may be independent of changes in systemic butyrate levels.
The results presented here suggest that the intestinal microbiota is mechanistically linked to the systemic inflammation present in T1D families. Figure 5 models how a modern low-fiber diet and associated proinflammatory microbiota may impair temporal induction of counter regulation in individuals with an inherited hyper-responsiveness to innate stimuli. Under either illustrated scenario, genetically at-risk younger children have a higher level of baseline inflammation and are more susceptible to tolerance breaking inflammatory excursions, consistent with (1) the age-related decline in the risk of multiple antibody seroconversion during childhood68, and (2) the commonly observed pediatric onset of T1D. In the absence of a high fiber diet and protective microbiota, evidence suggests that the intestinal mucus barrier can be compromised69, promoting bacterial translocation and systemic inflammation, while impairing Treg differentiation and proliferation. Consequently, temporal induction of counter regulation is slower and less robust, fostering a higher incidence of T1D and younger age of onset.
This pilot study suggests that it feasible to modify the inflammatory state associated with T1D susceptibility through probiotic supplement. It provides a needed framework for future studies that encompasses a basis for the estimation of appropriate sample sizes. This pilot study also has several limitations. These include its modest sample size, lack of a placebo group, analysis of only two timepoints, a heterogeneous study population in terms of HLA and autoantibody status, and modest measured effects. Further, the probiotic was not assessed for viability and analysis of the microbiota was limited to amplicon sequencing. Finally, the absence of a non-T1D family comparator group did not allow us to determine if these measured effects would be observed to the same degree in a non-susceptible healthy control population. There is a substantial need for safe, broadly applicable therapies to reduce the risk in susceptible individuals and slow the progression of T1D both before and after clinical onset of disease. This study indicates that additional investigations of prebiotic and probiotic strategies are warranted as they may be efficacious either alone or in combination with other therapeutic agents. Future studies are aimed at associating probiotic-induced immunologic changes with measures of β-cell function, as this may suggest a prevention strategy for those with underlying T1D susceptibility.
Materials and methods
Study participants
Twenty-five children were recruited through the Children’s Wisconsin (CW) Diabetes Clinic between April 2018 and November 2018. Inclusion criteria for participants were healthy children aged 5–17 years who had a full sibling diagnosed with T1D and were treatment naïve of any immunomodulatory, antibiotic, or probiotic agents within the past 3 months. Only one sibling per family could participate. Exclusion criteria were the presence of celiac disease, other chronic inflammatory/autoimmune disease besides hypothyroidism well-controlled with levothyroxine, or the use of medications known to affect gastrointestinal function or glucose metabolism (such as antibiotics) within the past month.
Ethical statement
All participants and their guardian(s) provided written informed consent and those aged 7–14 years of age also provided informed assent. Study procedures were approved by the Children’s Wisconsin Institutional Research Board (IRB #1171017-6) and were consistent with the Declaration of Helsinki. The study was prospectively registered with the National Institutes of Health (clinicaltrials.gov NCT03423589; 06/02/2018).
Study procedures
During this single-arm, open label trial, all participants received a six-week course of a multi-strain probiotic supplement containing Bifidobacteria longum, B. infantis, B. breve, Lactobacillus acidophilus, L. casei, L. delbrueckii subspecies Bulgaricus, L. plantarum, and Streptococcus salivarius subspecies thermophilus (Alfasigma USA, Inc. Covington, LA, USA).
Similar formulations have been found safe in pediatric patients70,71,72,73 and able to delay/prevent T1D progression in the NOD mouse37. The probiotic was purchased from a wholesale pharmacy distributor and the supplement manufacturer was not involved in any aspect of the study concept, design, or execution. Dosing, which was based upon the weight-dependent scheme described by Miele et al.71, consisted of 450 billion colony forming units (CFU) by mouth daily for those aged < 11 years and 900 billion CFU by mouth day for those aged ≥ 11 years. Participants were asked to store the probiotic sachets in the refrigerator until use and were instructed to sprinkle the contents on cold or room temperature food or suspend into non-carbonated drinks. Before starting the probiotic, participants provided a medical history and had a physical examination performed by a pediatric endocrinologist, including Tanner pubertal staging. Participants also completed the Block 2014 Food Frequency Questionnaire (NutritionQuest, Berkeley, CA, USA), a validated instrument of dietary intake44,74,75 over the previous 12 months, with the assistance of their guardian(s).
Peripheral blood was collected within 24 h before starting the probiotic and within 1 week after completing the six-week probiotic supplementation. Blood was drawn into K + EDTA or acid citrate dextrose solution A anti-coagulant and components were immediately separated by Ficoll-Histopaque (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) density gradient centrifugation. PBMC were cryopreserved and plasma was stored at − 80 °C until use. Measurement of autoantibodies towards glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD), insulinoma antigen 2 (IA-2), insulin (INS) and zinc transporter 8 (ZnT8) was conducted as described76. HLA genotyping was conducted as described77. Subjects returned unused sachets at study end and the adherence rate was calculated by Children’s Wisconsin Investigational Drug Services.
Analysis of the fecal microbiota
Using a kit supplied to participant families, fresh stool was collected at home and immediately preserved in RNAlater (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA). Participants were instructed to perform this procedure no more than 3 days before the study visit and keep the stool sample in their home refrigerator until transport to the research center. Upon arrival to the laboratory, stool samples were stored at − 80 °C. Stool was collected ≤ 72 h before starting the probiotic and within 1 week after completing the 6-week probiotic supplementation. DNA was extracted from stool using the MoBIO PowerSoil Isolation Kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA). The V4 region of the 16S rDNA gene was amplified by PCR and sequenced (Diversigen, Baylor College of Medicine, Waco, TX, USA) on the MiSeq platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) using the 2 × 250-bp protocol, yielding pair-end reads78. QIIME2 (v. 2019.7) was used to analyze the paired-end 16S rDNA sequencing reads79. Sequences were imported and summarized to check quality and chimeric sequences removed with DADA280. The representative sequences were aligned81, masked for hypervariable regions, and then phylogenetic trees were produced. A classifier was generated to assign taxonomy to the reads using the 99% similarity files of the GreenGenes database v. 13_8 and the 515–806 region (V4) of the 16S gene82. Taxonomy was assigned to the feature table to generate relative abundance tables and make taxonomy bar plots. Alpha and beta diversity metrics were analyzed using QIIME2. LEfSe, Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) effect size, was run to determine enriched organisms in the pre- and post-supplement samples42. Sequencing data files have been deposited at The National Center for Biotechnology Information Sequence Read Archive (Accession Number: PRJNA714090). The probiotic supplement provided to participants was analyzed by sequencing the V4 region of the16S rDNA region, metagenomic sequencing to assess its composition was not conducted. These analyzed sachets had the same lot number and were purchased at the same time as those dispensed to the participants.
Transcriptional analyses
Plasma-induced transcription assays, the primary outcome measure, utilized cryopreserved “responder” PBMC of a single healthy blood donor (Cellular Technology Ltd., Shaker Heights, OH, USA) cultured with 200 μl participant plasma in 300 μl RPMI 1640 medium. After a 9-h culture, RNA was extracted and induced transcription was measured using Affymetrix GeneChip Human Genome U133 plus 2.0 arrays (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA) as described33. Array data was subjected to global median normalization with Bioconductor Robust Multi-array Analysis83.
Statistics
The significance of gene expression measurements was determined by ANOVA and the rate of type I errors in multiple testing was assessed by false discovery rate (FDR) determined with Partek Genomics Suite 6.6 (Partek, Saint Louis, MO, USA). Ontological analysis utilized IPA (QIAGEN, Redwood City, CA, USA). Hierarchical clustering was conducted with Genesis84. All gene expression data files have been deposited at The National Center for Biotechnology Information Gene Expression Omnibus (Accession Number: GSE162622).
Analysis of plasma mediators
Plasma samples were analyzed in duplicate using the Human Cytokine/Human Chemokine Array 65-plex Panel (HD65; Eve Technologies, Calgary, AB. Canada). Plasma C reactive protein (CRP) levels were measured by ELISA (ABCAM, Cambridge, MA, USA).
Measurement of circulating short-chain fatty acids
Plasma SCFA levels were measured before and after supplementation by the Mayo Clinic Metabolomics Research Core using a targeted mass spectrometry approach that utilized 13C or 15N isotope labeled reference compounds85.
Analysis of circulating T-cell subsets
PBMCs were stained with the fixable Live/Dead Violet dye (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY) for 30 min on ice, followed by surface staining for anti-CD4 (clone RPA-T4), anti-CD25 (clone M-A251), anti-CD45RO (clone UCHL1), anti-CD45RA (clone HI100), and anti-CD127 (clone HIR-7R-M21) (BD Bioscience, San Jose, CA) on ice for 30 min, followed by intracellular staining with anti-FOXP3 (clone PCH101) (eBioscience, San Diego, CA). Stained cells were analyzed on a LSR II flow cytometer (BD Bioscience). Data were analyzed using FlowJo software 9.0 (TreeStar, Ashland, OR, USA).
References
Coppieters, K. T. et al. Demonstration of islet-autoreactive CD8 T cells in insulitic lesions from recent onset and long-term type 1 diabetes patients. J. Exp. Med. 209, 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20111187 (2012).
Herold, K. C. et al. An anti-CD3 antibody, teplizumab, in relatives at risk for type 1 diabetes. N Engl. J. Med. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1902226 (2019).
Cabrera, S. M., Henschel, A. M. & Hessner, M. J. Innate inflammation in type 1 diabetes. Transl. Res. 167, 214–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trsl.2015.04.011 (2016).
Cabrera, S. M., Chen, Y. G., Hagopian, W. A. & Hessner, M. J. Blood-based signatures in type 1 diabetes. Diabetologia 59, 414–425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-015-3843-x (2016).
Bradshaw, E. M. et al. Monocytes from patients with type 1 diabetes spontaneously secrete proinflammatory cytokines inducing Th17 cells. J. Immunol. 183, 4432–4439. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.0900576 (2009).
Kallionpaa, H. et al. Innate immune activity is detected prior to seroconversion in children with HLA-conferred type 1 diabetes susceptibility. Diabetes 63, 2402–2414. https://doi.org/10.2337/db13-1775db13-1775 (2014).
Ferreira, R. C. et al. A type I interferon transcriptional signature precedes autoimmunity in children genetically at risk for type 1 diabetes. Diabetes 63, 2538–2550. https://doi.org/10.2337/db13-1777db13-1777 (2014).
Rodrigues, K. B. et al. Innate immune stimulation of whole blood reveals IFN-1 hyper-responsiveness in type 1 diabetes. Diabetologia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-020-05179-4 (2020).
Hussain, M. J. et al. Cytokine overproduction in healthy first degree relatives of patients with IDDM. Diabetologia 41, 343–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001250050913 (1998).
Kayserova, J. et al. Decreased dendritic cell numbers but increased TLR9-mediated interferon-alpha production in first degree relatives of type 1 diabetes patients. Clin. Immunol. 153, 49–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clim.2014.03.018 (2014).
Devaraj, S. et al. Increased monocytic activity and biomarkers of inflammation in patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes 55, 774–779 (2006).
Patterson, C. C. et al. Trends in childhood type 1 diabetes incidence in Europe during 1989–2008: Evidence of non-uniformity over time in rates of increase. Diabetologia 55, 2142–2147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-012-2571-8 (2012).
Pettitt, D. J. et al. Prevalence of diabetes in U.S. youth in 2009: The SEARCH for diabetes in youth study. Diabetes Care 37, 402–408. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc13-1838 (2014).
Gillespie, K. M. et al. The rising incidence of childhood type 1 diabetes and reduced contribution of high-risk HLA haplotypes. Lancet 364, 1699–1700. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17357-1 (2004).
Vehik, K. & Dabelea, D. The changing epidemiology of type 1 diabetes: Why is it going through the roof? Diabetes Metab. Res. Rev. 27, 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.1141 (2011).
Vaarala, O., Atkinson, M. A. & Neu, J. The, “perfect storm” for type 1 diabetes: the complex interplay between intestinal microbiota, gut permeability, and mucosal immunity. Diabetes 57, 2555–2562 (2008).
Atkinson, M. A. & Chervonsky, A. Does the gut microbiota have a role in type 1 diabetes? Early evidence from humans and animal models of the disease. Diabetologia 55, 2868–2877. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-012-2672-4 (2012).
De Filippo, C. et al. Impact of diet in shaping gut microbiota revealed by a comparative study in children from Europe and rural Africa. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 14691–14696. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1005963107 (2010).
Rollo, F., Ubaldi, M., Ermini, L. & Marota, I. Otzi’s last meals: DNA analysis of the intestinal content of the Neolithic glacier mummy from the Alps. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 12594–12599. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.192184599 (2002).
Cano, R. J. et al. Paleomicrobiology: Revealing fecal microbiomes of ancient indigenous cultures. PLoS ONE 9, e106833. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106833 (2014).
Schnorr, S. L. et al. Gut microbiome of the Hadza hunter-gatherers. Nat. Commun. 5, 3654. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4654 (2014).
Bosi, E. et al. Increased intestinal permeability precedes clinical onset of type 1 diabetes. Diabetologia 49, 2824–2827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-006-0465-3 (2006).
Pellegrini, S. et al. Duodenal mucosa of patients with type 1 diabetes shows distinctive inflammatory profile and microbiota. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 102, 1468–1477. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2016-3222 (2017).
Devaraj, S., Dasu, M. R., Park, S. H. & Jialal, I. Increased levels of ligands of Toll-like receptors 2 and 4 in type 1 diabetes. Diabetologia 52, 1665–1668 (2009).
Knip, M. & Siljander, H. The role of the intestinal microbiota in type 1 diabetes mellitus. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 12, 154–167. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2015.218 (2016).
Uusitalo, U. et al. Association of early exposure of probiotics and islet autoimmunity in the TEDDY study. JAMA Pediatr. 170, 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.2757 (2016).
Bonifacio, E., Warncke, K., Winkler, C., Wallner, M. & Ziegler, A. G. Cesarean section and interferon-induced helicase gene polymorphisms combine to increase childhood type 1 diabetes risk. Diabetes 60, 3300–3306. https://doi.org/10.2337/db11-0729 (2011).
Solis, G., de Los Reyes-Gavilan, C. G., Fernandez, N., Margolles, A. & Gueimonde, M. Establishment and development of lactic acid bacteria and bifidobacteria microbiota in breast-milk and the infant gut. Anaerobe 16, 307–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anaerobe.2010.02.004 (2010).
Martin, R., Heilig, G. H., Zoetendal, E. G., Smidt, H. & Rodriguez, J. M. Diversity of the Lactobacillus group in breast milk and vagina of healthy women and potential role in the colonization of the infant gut. J. Appl. Microbiol. 103, 2638–2644. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03497.x (2007).
Mueller, N. T., Bakacs, E., Combellick, J., Grigoryan, Z. & Dominguez-Bello, M. G. The infant microbiome development: Mom matters. Trends Mol. Med. 21, 109–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmed.2014.12.002 (2015).
Picard, C. et al. Review article: Bifidobacteria as probiotic agents—Physiological effects and clinical benefits. Aliment Pharmacol. Ther. 22, 495–512. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02615.x (2005).
Dedrick, S. et al. The role of gut microbiota and environmental factors in type 1 diabetes pathogenesis. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne) 11, 78. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2020.00078 (2020).
Chen, Y. G. et al. Molecular signatures differentiate immune States in type 1 diabetic families. Diabetes 63, 3960–3973. https://doi.org/10.2337/db14-0214 (2014).
Kaldunski, M. et al. Identification of a serum-induced transcriptional signature associated with type 1 diabetes in the BioBreeding rat. Diabetes 59, 2375–2385. https://doi.org/10.2337/db10-0372 (2010).
Chen, Y. G. et al. Temporal induction of immunoregulatory processes coincides with age-dependent resistance to viral-induced type 1 diabetes. Genes Immun. 14, 387–400. https://doi.org/10.1038/gene.2013.31 (2013).
Henschel, A. M. et al. Modulation of the diet and gastrointestinal microbiota normalizes systemic inflammation and beta-cell chemokine expression associated with autoimmune diabetes susceptibility. PLoS ONE 13, e0190351. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190351 (2018).
Calcinaro, F. et al. Oral probiotic administration induces interleukin-10 production and prevents spontaneous autoimmune diabetes in the non-obese diabetic mouse. Diabetologia 48, 1565–1575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-005-1831-2 (2005).
Wen, L. et al. Innate immunity and intestinal microbiota in the development of type 1 diabetes. Nature 455, 1109–1113. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07336 (2008).
de Oliveira, G. L. V., Leite, A. Z., Higuchi, B. S., Gonzaga, M. I. & Mariano, V. S. Intestinal dysbiosis and probiotic applications in autoimmune diseases. Immunology 152, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/imm.12765 (2017).
Kouchaki, E. et al. Clinical and metabolic response to probiotic supplementation in patients with multiple sclerosis: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Clin. Nutr. 36, 1245–1249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2016.08.015 (2017).
Vaghef-Mehrabany, E. et al. Probiotic supplementation improves inflammatory status in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Nutrition 30, 430–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2013.09.007 (2014).
Segata, N. et al. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biol. 12, R60. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2011-12-6-r60 (2011).
Kostic, A. D. et al. The dynamics of the human infant gut microbiome in development and in progression toward type 1 diabetes. Cell Host Microbe 17, 260–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2015.01.001 (2015).
Block, G., Woods, M., Potosky, A. & Clifford, C. Validation of a self-administered diet history questionnaire using multiple diet records. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 43, 1327–1335. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(90)90099-b (1990).
Mares-Perlman, J. A. et al. A diet history questionnaire ranks nutrient intakes in middle-aged and older men and women similarly to multiple food records. J. Nutr. 123, 489–501. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/123.3.489 (1993).
Wilson, A. S. et al. Diet and the human gut microbiome: An international review. Dig. Dis. Sci. 65, 723–740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-020-06112-w (2020).
Trumbo, P. et al. Dietary reference intakes for energy, carbohydrate, fiber, fat, fatty acids, cholesterol, protein and amino acids. J. Am. Diet Assoc. 102, 1621–1630. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-8223(02)90346-9 (2002).
Kranz, S., Brauchla, M., Slavin, J. L. & Miller, K. B. What do we know about dietary fiber intake in children and health? The effects of fiber intake on constipation, obesity, and diabetes in children. Adv. Nutr. 3, 47–53. https://doi.org/10.3945/an.111.001362 (2012).
Smith, P. M. et al. The microbial metabolites, short-chain fatty acids, regulate colonic Treg cell homeostasis. Science 341, 569–573. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1241165 (2013).
Waldecker, M., Kautenburger, T., Daumann, H., Busch, C. & Schrenk, D. Inhibition of histone-deacetylase activity by short-chain fatty acids and some polyphenol metabolites formed in the colon. J. Nutr. Biochem. 19, 587–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnutbio.2007.08.002 (2008).
Ang, Z. et al. Human and mouse monocytes display distinct signalling and cytokine profiles upon stimulation with FFAR2/FFAR3 short-chain fatty acid receptor agonists. Sci. Rep. 6, 34145. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep34145 (2016).
de Goffau, M. C. et al. Fecal microbiota composition differs between children with beta-cell autoimmunity and those without. Diabetes 62, 1238–1244. https://doi.org/10.2337/db12-0526 (2013).
Brusko, T. et al. No alterations in the frequency of FOXP3+ regulatory T-cells in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes 56, 604–612. https://doi.org/10.2337/db06-1248 (2007).
Ren, X. et al. Increase in peripheral blood intermediate monocytes is associated with the development of recent-onset type 1 diabetes mellitus in children. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 13, 209–218. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.15659 (2017).
Cabrera, S. M. et al. Innate immune activity as a predictor of persistent insulin secretion and association with responsiveness to CTLA4-Ig treatment in recent-onset type 1 diabetes. Diabetologia 61, 2356–2370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-018-4708-x (2018).
van Loosdregt, J. et al. Stabilization of the transcription factor Foxp3 by the deubiquitinase USP7 increases treg-cell-suppressive capacity. Immunity 39, 259–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2013.05.018 (2013).
Chen, Z. et al. The ubiquitin ligase stub1 negatively modulates regulatory T cell suppressive activity by promoting degradation of the transcription factor foxp3. Immunity 39, 272–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2013.08.006 (2013).
Neyrinck, A. M. et al. Development of a repertoire and a food frequency questionnaire for estimating dietary fiber intake considering prebiotics: Input from the fibertag project. Nutrients. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12092824 (2020).
Bowyer, R. C. E. et al. Use of dietary indices to control for diet in human gut microbiota studies. Microbiome 6, 77. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-018-0455-y (2018).
Hall, J. C. & Rosen, A. Type I interferons: Crucial participants in disease amplification in autoimmunity. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 6, 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2009.237 (2010).
Yang, C. A. & Chiang, B. L. Inflammasomes and human autoimmunity: A comprehensive review. J. Autoimmun. 61, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaut.2015.05.001 (2015).
Furusawa, Y. et al. Commensal microbe-derived butyrate induces the differentiation of colonic regulatory T cells. Nature 504, 446–450. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12721 (2013).
LeBlanc, J. G. et al. Beneficial effects on host energy metabolism of short-chain fatty acids and vitamins produced by commensal and probiotic bacteria. Microb. Cell Fact 16, 79. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-017-0691-z (2017).
Chang, P. V., Hao, L., Offermanns, S. & Medzhitov, R. The microbial metabolite butyrate regulates intestinal macrophage function via histone deacetylase inhibition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111, 2247–2252. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1322269111 (2014).
Ohata, A., Usami, M. & Miyoshi, M. Short-chain fatty acids alter tight junction permeability in intestinal monolayer cells via lipoxygenase activation. Nutrition 21, 838–847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2004.12.004 (2005).
Marino, E. et al. Gut microbial metabolites limit the frequency of autoimmune T cells and protect against type 1 diabetes. Nat. Immunol. 18, 552–562. https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.3713 (2017).
de Groot, P. F. et al. Oral butyrate does not affect innate immunity and islet autoimmunity in individuals with longstanding type 1 diabetes: A randomised controlled trial. Diabetologia 63, 597–610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-019-05073-8 (2020).
Bonifacio, E. et al. An age-related exponential decline in the risk of multiple islet autoantibody seroconversion during childhood. Diabetes Care. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc20-2122 (2021).
Desai, M. S. et al. A dietary fiber-deprived gut microbiota degrades the colonic mucus barrier and enhances pathogen susceptibility. Cell 167, 1339–1353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.10.043 (2016).
Huynh, H. Q. et al. Probiotic preparation VSL#3 induces remission in children with mild to moderate acute ulcerative colitis: A pilot study. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 15, 760–768. https://doi.org/10.1002/ibd.20816 (2009).
Miele, E. et al. Effect of a probiotic preparation (VSL#3) on induction and maintenance of remission in children with ulcerative colitis. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 104, 437–443. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2008.118 (2009).
Alisi, A. et al. Randomised clinical trial: The beneficial effects of VSL#3 in obese children with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Aliment Pharmacol. Ther. 39, 1276–1285. https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.12758 (2014).
Guandalini, S. et al. VSL#3 improves symptoms in children with irritable bowel syndrome: A multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover study. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 51, 24–30. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0b013e3181ca4d95 (2010).
Block, G., Coyle, L. M., Hartman, A. M. & Scoppa, S. M. Revision of dietary analysis software for the health habits and history questionnaire. Am. J. Epidemiol. 139, 1190–1196. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116965 (1994).
Block, G. et al. A data-based approach to diet questionnaire design and testing. Am. J. Epidemiol. 124, 453–469. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114416 (1986).
Woo, W. et al. A novel high-throughput method for accurate, rapid, and economical measurement of multiple type 1 diabetes autoantibodies. J. Immunol. Methods 244, 91–103 (2000).
Levy, H. et al. Transcriptional signatures as a disease-specific and predictive inflammatory biomarker for type 1 diabetes. Genes Immun. 13, 593–604. https://doi.org/10.1038/gene.2012.41 (2012).
Caporaso, J. G. et al. Ultra-high-throughput microbial community analysis on the Illumina HiSeq and MiSeq platforms. ISME J. 6, 1621–1624. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2012.8ismej20128 (2012).
Bolyen, E. et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 852–857. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-019-0209-9 (2019).
Callahan, B. J. et al. DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods 13, 581–583. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3869 (2016).
Katoh, K. & Standley, D. M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 772–780. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst010 (2013).
DeSantis, T. Z. et al. Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72, 5069–5072. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.03006-05 (2006).
Gentleman, R. C. et al. Bioconductor: Open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics. Genome Biol. 5, R80. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2004-5-10-r80 (2004).
Sturn, A., Quackenbush, J. & Trajanoski, Z. Genesis: Cluster analysis of microarray data. Bioinformatics 18, 207–208 (2002).
Moreau, N. M. et al. Simultaneous measurement of plasma concentrations and 13C-enrichment of short-chain fatty acids, lactic acid and ketone bodies by gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. B Anal. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 784, 395–403 (2003).
von Herrath, M. G., Fujinami, R. S. & Whitton, J. L. Microorganisms and autoimmunity: Making the barren field fertile? Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 1, 151–157. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro754 (2003).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by American Diabetes Association (1-19-ICTS-129 to M.J.H., 1-18-ICTS-094 to S.M.C.). The National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK125014 to M.J.H and S.M.C, R01DK121528 to M.J.H.), Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation International (3-SRA-2018-478-S-B to M.J.H.), a Children’s Wisconsin Research Institute Pilot Innovation Research grant (to S.M.C.), the George and Ruth Leef Family and Tee Up Fore the Cure; the David & Julia Uihlein Charitable Foundation; and the Children’s Wisconsin Foundation. The funders had no role in how the studies were conducted or interpreted. The authors thank the individuals who participated in this study as well as the physicians, study coordinators (Joanna Kramer, Clare Bingham-Tyson), nurses and staff of the Children’s Wisconsin and the Max McGee Research Center for Juvenile Diabetes who assisted in participant recruitment and sample collection/processing.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
S.M.C. and A.T.C. conducted clinical study visits; S.J., P.M.S. and S.N.A. conducted data and statistical analysis; A.E.C., T.P. and M.F.R. conducted laboratory studies, Y.-G.C. directed flow cytometry studies, N.H.S. supported microbiome studies, M.J.H. and S.M.C. designed study, conducted data analysis, and wrote manuscript. All authors reviewed, edited, and approved the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Cabrera, S.M., Coren, A.T., Pant, T. et al. Probiotic normalization of systemic inflammation in siblings of type 1 diabetes patients: an open-label pilot study. Sci Rep 12, 3306 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-07203-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-07203-6
This article is cited by
-
Systemic inflammatory proteins in offspring following maternal probiotic supplementation for atopic dermatitis prevention
Clinical and Molecular Allergy (2023)
-
Mechanistic Insights into Immune-Microbiota Interactions and Preventive Role of Probiotics Against Autoimmune Diabetes Mellitus
Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins (2023)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.