Abstract
Cell polarity and morphogenesis are regulated by the small GTPase Cdc42. Even though major advances have been done in the field during the last years, the molecular details leading to its activation in particular cellular contexts are not completely understood. In fission yeast, the β(1,3)-glucanase Eng2 is a “moonlighting protein” with a dual function, acting as a hydrolase during spore dehiscence, and as component of the endocytic machinery in vegetative cells. Here, we report that Eng2 plays a role in Cdc42 activation during polarized growth through its interaction with the scaffold protein Scd2, which brings Cdc42 together with its guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) Scd1. eng2Δ mutant cells have defects in activation of the bipolar growth (NETO), remaining monopolar during all the cell cycle. In the absence of Eng2 the accumulation of Scd1 and Scd2 at the poles is reduced, the levels of Cdc42 activation decrease, and the Cdc42 oscillatory behavior, associated with bipolar growth in wild type cells, is altered. Furthermore, overexpression of Eng2 partially rescues the growth and polarity defects of a cdc42-L160S mutant. Altogether, our work unveils a new factor regulating the activity of Cdc42, which could potentially link the polarity and endocytic machineries.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Polarized growth is essential for morphogenesis and completion of a correct developmental program in eukaryotic organisms reviewed in Refs.1,2,3,4,5. Defects in polarized growth lead to different diseases such as neuronal disorders or cancer 6,7,8,9,10.
In Schizosaccharomyces pombe, polarized growth is limited to the cell tips during vegetative growth and to the mating projections during conjugation reviewed in Refs.4,11,12. After cell separation, a new-born cell initially grows at a single pole (the old pole opposite to the cytokinesis site), and later, in G2 phase, it undergoes a cell cycle-regulated switch termed New End Take-Off (NETO), which creates two growth poles until mitosis13. Genetic analyses identified numerous factors that affect the establishment of cell polarity and NETO 14,15,16. Thus, the Tea1–Tea4 complex acts as a polarity marker, since mutants lacking these proteins produce cells with a “T-Shape” morphology. Tea4 interacts with the formin For3, which is required for interphase actin cable formation and whose regulation is mediated by proteins like Cdc42, Pob1 or Bud6 17,18,19. Cdc42 is a key element in the regulation of polarized growth in eukaryotic cells reviewed in Refs.2,20,21. This small GTPase is essential for viability in S. pombe. Distinct mutant alleles cause different defects in growth, secretion, endosomal traffic, vacuole formation or actin cable organization, probably reflecting impaired interaction with particular effectors22,23,24. Cdc42 is regulated by two GEFs, Gef1 and Scd1 25,26,27, which share an essential function but have different functions in polarized growth 26. Scd1 is required for establishing polarity and needs the scaffold protein Scd2 to interact with Cdc42 27. Scd1 also restricts Gef1 localization to maintain the morphology during vegetative growth 27,28,29. Gef1 is dispensable for cell polarization per se but promotes Scd1 recruitment to the new end to enable the transition from monopolar to bipolar growth 27,30. Cdc42 activation displays a remarkable oscillatory behavior during bipolar growth in S. pombe 30, which derive from amplification of a small initial stochastic event through positive feedback mechanisms 31,32,33.
Polarized growth is strongly linked to secretion and endocytosis 12,22,34,35,36. Cdc42 and phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PI(4,5)P2) define the position of the exocyst complex 37. Reciprocally, polarized secretion is required to maintain cell polarity 38,39. Mutants in different exocyst subunits have morphological defects that are exacerbated when actin cables are disrupted 40,41. Similarly, mutations in endocytic proteins like End4/Sla2, Myo1 or Btn1 install defects in cell polarity in S. pombe 42,43,44, S. cerevisiae 45,46 and mammalian cells 47.
Eng2 is a “moonlighting protein” with different functions along the cell cycle. During sporulation, it functions as a β(1,3)-glucanase required to hydrolyze the ascus wall allowing the release of ascospores 48. During vegetative growth, Eng2 forms a cytoplasmic complex with Lsb1/Csh3 that is necessary for coupling the endocytic coat to the actin module during endocytosis 49. In eng2Δ cells, endocytosis is blocked at high temperature and cells show growth defects and rounded morphology, indicative of a defect in polarity establishment or maintenance 49.
Here, we show that in addition to those functions, eng2∆ cells have a defect in NETO establishment. We have found that Eng2 interacts with the Cdc42 scaffold protein Scd2, and that depletion of Eng2 causes a reduction in the tip accumulation of Scd2 and the Cdc42 GEF Scd1. Probably as a consequence of the Scd2-Scd1 localization defect, the cellular pool of active Cdc42 drops in the absence of Eng2, and its oscillatory behavior is altered, explaining the defects in polarized growth and morphogenesis of eng2∆ cells.
Altogether, our work unveils a new element interacting with a component of the functional network of Cdc42 and regulates its GTPase activity directly or indirectly, which could potentially link the polarity and endocytic machineries.
Results
eng2Δ mutant cells have a defect in cell polarity establishment
Eng2 is a protein with dual function: it has β(1,3)-glucanase activity required for the hydrolysis of the ascus cell wall after spore formation has been completed 48 and it also functions during vegetative growth as a component of an endocytic module that couples the endocytic coat to the actin cytoskeleton 49. In addition to defects in endocytic uptake, we noticed that eng2Δ mutants have defects in establishing growth at the new end, as judged by calcofluor white staining of logarithmic-growing eng2Δ cells. Calcofluor marks S. pombe septum and growth regions. In asynchronous cultures, around 60–70% of wild type cells were bipolar whereas the percentage decreased to 30–40% of eng2Δ cells (Fig. 1A), indicating that eng2+ is required for growth activation at the new pole (NETO).
To confirm this observation, cdc10-129 and cdc10-129 eng2Δ strains were used to synchronize the cells by arrest-release and then, the actin cytoskeleton was stained with phalloidin. When cultured at 36 °C, cdc10-129 cells arrest in G1, and cell growth is polarized to one of the tips 50. In the cdc10-129 strain, bipolar cells appeared 30 min after the release from the block, reaching a maximum of 80–90% of the culture at 150 min, while only 35% of cdc10-129 eng2Δ cells were able to switch to bipolar growth (Fig. 1B). The timing of septum formation was similar in both strains, suggesting that eng2+ deletion did not delay cell cycle progression. Together, these results indicated that Eng2 had a function in growth activation at the new end.
The growth pattern of eng2Δ cells was further analyzed by time-lapse microscopy. After cell division, both daughter cells activated growth from the old end and then switched to bipolar growth in the wild-type strain (Fig. 1C). In contrast, in the eng2Δ mutant strain the majority of daughter cells (69%) initiated cell growth at the old end and never activated growth at the new end, consistent with the calcofluor staining pattern. Interestingly, only a small percentage (6%) of cells had a growth pattern similar to that of tea1Δ or tea4Δ mutants, i.e. one cell grew at the old end and the other from the new end 14,51 suggesting that eng2Δ cells do not have a deffect in re-establishing growth. Total growth for each cell tip in wild-type and eng2Δ daughter cell pairs was determined from time-lapse analysis and confirmed the differences in the growth pattern between the two strains (Fig. 1D). Additionally, we quantified the growth rate of WT and eng2Δ cells and we found significant differences at both poles (Fig S1A), consistent with the above observations. When total growth was determined in both strains, it was slightly higher in wild type cells (5.92 ± 1.52 μm versus 5.04 ± 0.85 μm in eng2Δ cells), explaining the slightly smaller size of mutant cells. Together, these results suggest that Eng2 is required for growth activation at the new end and that it functions in a pathway different from that of the polarity markers Tea1 and Tea4.
To investigate the possible nature of the NETO defect, we analyzed the localization of proteins required for polarity establishment and for polarized growth in eng2Δ cells. No defects were observed in the localization of the Tea1 polarity marker 52, as compared to wild-type cells (Fig. S1B). This indicates that Eng2 functions downstream of this protein. However, other proteins required for polarized growth -such as the class V myosin Myo5253—were mainly localized to one of the poles (Fig. 1E). The percentage of cells with monopolar Myo52 distribution in the mutant perfectly matched the percentage of monopolar eng2Δ cells. Indeed, Myo52 always localized to the growing pole of cells. Thus, the absence of Myo52 in the new ends could be related with the previously described defect in the directionality of the actin cables 49. Consistently, the Bgs4 subunit of the glucan synthase54 also had a monopolar distribution in the eng2Δ mutant (Fig. 1F).
Absence of Eng2 reduces the levels of active Cdc42
Polarity establishment in yeasts involves the recruitment and activation of the Cdc42 GTPase to a cortical landmark, where it promotes actin cytoskeleton polymerization and regulates exocytosis reviewed in Refs.4,12,55,56. To understand the reasons behind the phenotype of eng2Δ cells, we analyzed whether this mutation caused changes in the Cdc42 protein level, localization or activity. Localization of active Cdc42 was visualized in wild-type and eng2Δ cells by using the GFP-tagged Cdc42/Rac-interactive binding (CRIB) domain from Gic2 57, which is also used as a marker for Cdc42-GTP in fission yeast 58. No significant differences in the monopolar/bipolar distribution of CRIB-GFP were observed between both strains (66% of the wild-type cells versus 61% of eng2Δ cells had a bipolar distribution). However, the intensity of the CRIB-GFP signal at the plasma membrane was greatly reduced in the eng2Δ mutant as compared to the wild-type strain (Fig. 2A). Measurement of the GFP fluorescence intensity at the cell tips indicated a twofold reduction in eng2Δ cells (Fig. 2B). Linescan analysis of the GFP intensity along the cell tips showed that CRIB-GFP failed to concentrate at these areas in eng2Δ cells and certain spreading was observed beyond the tip (Fig. 2A). Since eng2Δ cells are shorter and rounder when grown at high temperature 49, we also analyzed CRIB-GFP distribution at 36 °C. The results showed a higher reduction in the CRIB-GFP signal associated with the tips in the eng2Δ mutant (Fig. 2C), suggesting that Eng2 participates in the concentration of active Cdc42 at the tips.
To confirm these observations, the levels of total and active Cdc42 were analyzed in eng2Δ cells. Total levels of Cdc42, as detected by immunoblot, were similar in the wild-type and eng2Δ strains at both temperatures, ruling out the possibility that this mutant had a defect in Cdc42 stability (Fig. 2D). The amount of active GTP-Cdc42 was determined by pull-down experiments using a Cdc42/Rac interactive binding domain from mammalian Pak2 19 bound to glutathione S-transferase (GST-CRIB). These experiments showed a reduction of GTP-Cdc42 in the eng2Δ mutant with respect to wild-type cells, which was more pronounced at high temperature. Together, these results demonstrate that the absence of Eng2 produces a reduction in the cellular pool of active Cdc42 associated with the growing regions.
Cdc42 oscillation at the tips is reduced in eng2Δ mutants
Concentration of active Cdc42 exhibit anticorrelated fluctuations and oscillations at polarized cell tips that are essential for NETO 30. To analyze whether Cdc42 dynamics were altered in eng2Δ mutants, we used time-lapse microscopy in cells carrying CRIB-GFP. The results showed that in wild-type cells Cdc42 had anticorrelated oscillations after the transition from monopolar to bipolar growth, as previously described (Fig. 3A, upper row). In contrast, two types of cells were found in the eng2Δ mutant. Monopolar cells had fluctuations of Cdc42 intensity in both tips, although the CRIB-GFP fluorescence intensity at the new pole was always lower than 40% that of the old pole (Fig. 3A, middle row). Bipolar cells had fluctuations and oscillations in both poles, but no clear anticorrelation between them could be observed (Fig. 3A, lower row). Analysis of the oscillation amplitude in old and new ends indicated a significant difference in the new pole between wild-type and eng2Δ cells (Fig. 3B). Also, the cross-correlation observed in wild-type cells was completely lost in the eng2Δ mutant (Fig. 3B). Therefore, Eng2 is required for the periodic oscillation of active Cdc42 at cell tips and for the anticorrelated fluctuations of both poles that are essential for NETO.
The N-terminus of Eng2 containing a Pro-rich region, but not the glucanase activity, is required for NETO function
To determine if the Eng2 glucanase activity was necessary for its function in polarity, we used a strain carrying the eng2-E537A allele (Fig. 4A), with a mutation in the catalytic center that destroys the enzymatic activity and produces a protein that is not functional during sporulation 48,59. The percentage of bipolar cells of the eng2Δ mutant transformed with eng2-E537A was similar to that of the wild type strain (Fig. 4B), indicating that Eng2 glucanase activity is not necessary for NETO function.
Eng2 contains a Pro-rich region at the N-terminus in which two consensus motifs (PxxPxR and RxxPxxP) for interaction with SH3 domains are found (Fig. 4A) 60. To test whether this region was important for the monopolar/bipolar transition, we generated a truncation allele deleting the first 36 amino acids (eng2Δ1-36). Interestingly, strains carrying eng2Δ1-36 had the same phenotype as the eng2Δ mutant (Fig. 4B). Immunoblot analysis showed that the abundance of the Eng2-E537A and Eng2Δ1-36 mutant proteins was similar to that of the wild-type protein (Fig. S1C). Therefore, these results were not due to a decrease of Eng2Δ1-36 protein levels and indicate that the first 36 amino acids containing the Pro-rich region are essential for Eng2 function in NETO, whereas the glucanase activity is dispensable.
Eng2 interacts with the Cdc42 scaffold protein Scd2
Given that the N-terminal Pro-rich region of Eng2 was required for NETO, and that this motif is normally involved in the interaction with SH3 domains, we tested whether Eng2 could interact with some of the Cdc42 regulatory proteins containing SH3 domains by two-hybrid assays. The proteins selected were the Cdc42 scaffold proteins Scd2, which is homologous to Bem1 61, and Pob1, which is homologous to Boi1 and Boi2 from S. cerevisiae 19,61,62. As a positive control we used Lsb1/Csh3, previously found to interact with Eng2 49,63. The results indicated that Eng2 was able to interact with Scd2 but not with Pob1 (Fig. 4C).
To confirm the result of the two-hybrid analysis, co-immunoprecipitation experiments were performed. To this end, Eng2 was tagged with the HA epitope in a strain containing Scd2-GFP. Protein extracts were immunoprecipitated with anti-GFP antibody and the proteins present in the immunoprecipitates were analyzed by immunoblot using anti-GFP or anti-HA antibodies. The results showed that Eng2 was present in the immunoprecipitate (Fig. 4D), confirming the interaction between Scd2 and Eng2.
Eng2 is required for Scd1 and Scd2 accumulation at the cell tips
The above results prompted us to analyze Scd2 levels and localization in wild-type and eng2Δ cells. As previously described 64, Scd2 localized to the growing tip in both strains (Fig. 5A). However, the intensity of Scd2-GFP signal at the growing tips in eng2Δ cells was greatly reduced in comparison to control cells (Fig. 5B), although the amount of total Scd2 protein was not changed (Fig. S1D). Linescan analysis of the fluorescence intensity along the membrane showed that Scd2 was less concentrated at the tips in eng2Δ cells than in wild-type cells (Fig. 5C). In addition, we did observed certain spreading beyond the tip of the weak Scd2 signal in eng2Δ cells. Scd2 is a scaffold protein which facilitates Cdc42 activation by the Scd1 GEF 27,61,62. The localization of Scd1 and Scd2 is interdependent and it is also mediated by Gef1 27,28. Therefore, localization of Scd1-GFP was also analyzed in both strains. The intensity of Scd1-GFP at the cell tips was also reduced in eng2Δ cells as compared to control cells (Fig. 5D,E). Thus, these results indicate that Eng2 is involved in the regulation of the intracellular distribution of Scd1 and Scd2, likely by binding to Scd2.
Overexpression of Scd1 is able to restore the ability to grow at 36 °C of the thermosensitive cdc42-879 strain carrying the cdc42-L160S allele 19,23. Since Eng2 participates in the membrane localization of Scd1 and in the activation of Cdc42 at the growing tips, we tested whether eng2+ over-expression could also suppress the thermosensitive growth of this strain. Indeed, overexpression of eng2+ using the strong inducible Pnmt1 promoter partially complemented the growth defect of the strain carrying the cdc42-L160S allele at high temperature (Fig. 5F). Moreover, cdc42-L160S expressing cells had a variety of cell shapes, including pear-like cells, lemon-shaped cells, and round cells 19, and these morphological defects were largely corrected by over-expression of eng2+ (Fig. 5G). Reciprocally, deletion of eng2+ slightly exacerbated the thermosensitive phenotype of cdc42-L160S cells (Fig. 5H).
Discussion
Polarized growth controls important events like morphogenesis, cell motility, embryogenesis, and stem cell differentiation 4,5,21,24,65. The master regulator of cell polarization is Cdc42, a highly conserved member of the Rho family GTPases. In this work, we demonstrate that the “moonlighting protein” Eng2 that acts as a glucanase during sporulation and as a component of the endocytic machinery in vegetative cells 48,49, also plays a role in polarized growth, regulating Cdc42 activation and dynamics. Our results suggest that Eng2 is necessary for growth activation at the new end (NETO) in fission yeast. This is based on robust data showing that the eng2Δ mutant has defects in the transition from monopolar to bipolar growth, with most of the cells growing at the old end and never activating growth at the new end. The main polarity markers like Tea1 and Pom1 did not have localization defects in the eng2Δ background, and the monopolar growth pattern of tea1Δ mutants, with one cell growing at the old end and the other at the new end was different from that of eng2Δ cells. Our results suggest that Eng2 is not a polarity marker required to establish polarized growth but can be described as a new member of the Cdc42 pathway that maintains polarized growth acting downstream of Tea1 and Tea4 14,66,67.
Curiously, bud6Δ mutant presents a monopolar growth pattern similar to eng2Δ cells, with most of the cells growing only at the old end 51. Bud6 is a protein that collaborates with Cdc42 in the activation of For3 by relieving its autoinhibition 18. Consistent with the view that Eng2 role is to regulate Cdc42 activation, we found that Eng2 facilitates Scd1–Scd2 localization, Scd1 being a GDP–GTP exchange factor for Cdc42 25, and Scd2 a multi-domain adaptor protein that acts as a scaffold to support Scd1–Cdc42 interaction and regulates cell polarity in fission yeast28,61. Two-hybrid analysis and co-immunoprecipitation experiments unveiled that Eng2 interacts with Scd2. This protein contains two SH3 domains near the N-terminus, which usually mediate assembly of specific protein complexes by binding to proline-rich peptides 68. It is likely that the Eng2–Scd2 interaction is mediated by the SH3 domains of Scd2 and the proline-rich region of Eng2, since deletion of this region caused polarized growth defects similar to those caused by depletion of eng2+. Previously, we demonstrated that the proline-rich region of Eng2 interacts with Lsb1/Csh3, which also contains SH3 domains, and that this interaction is essential for Eng2 function in endocytosis 49. To our knowledge, Eng2 is the first endocytic protein identified in S. pombe that physically interacts with a component in the functional vicinity of Cdc42, although previous reports have suggested a possible relation between endocytic proteins and Cdc42 effectors. This is the case of the Pak1 kinase, which is part of a Cdc42 ternary complex that phosphorylates the endocytic Myosin Myo1 or the F-BAR protein Cdc15, which contributes to Gef1 recruitment to the new end for NETO69,70. Interestingly, endocytic machinery components capable of interacting with polarity factors have been previously identified in S. cerevisiae. This is the case of the ENTH domain of the yeast epsins, which is essential for viability in ent1Δ ent2Δ cells and binds to Cdc42 GAP proteins like Rga1, Bem3 or Rga2. ENTH1Y100R mutation that disturbs ENTH’s role in the cell can be bypassed by Gic1, Gic2 or Bem1 overexpression, but not by others effectors like Ste20, Cla4 or Bni1. Additionally, while this manuscript was under revision, it was reported that the Ecm25 protein associates with polarized endocytic sites and interacts with the polarity regulator Cdc42 and several late-stage endocytic proteins 71. Now, we show that eng2+ overexpression recover morphological and growth defects in the cdc42-L160S allele through Cdc42 re-localization to the ends of the cell. Additionally, we demonstrate that Eng2 binds to the multi-domain adaptor protein Scd2. Thus, we propose that Eng2 is necessary for Scd1–Scd2 localization and it facilitates Cdc42 activation.
A key observation derived from our work is that Cdc42 activation and dynamics are dependent on Eng2. Depletion of eng2+ caused not only CRIB-GFP delocalization but also a reduction in the total active Cdc42 in the cells, especially at high temperature. Supporting the idea that Eng2 is a new component involved in Cdc42 regulation, we also detected genetic interactions with the cdc42-L160S allele. Finally, we provide evidences suggesting that Eng2 controls oscillations in Cdc42 activation associated to bipolar growth. In the absence of Eng2, the oscillation amplitude decreased in the new end and the cross-correlation between the two ends was lost. These defects probably reflect alterations in the positive and negative feedback loops regulating the polarity of Cdc42 activation 72. Cellular oscillations control important aspects of cell physiology, such as polarized growth, DNA synthesis, mitosis and development. In yeast, these oscillations have been identified as a method to break the cellular symmetry 73 or to maintain bipolar growth 30, but these oscillations are also presents in plants, insects or animal cells, ensuring pollen tube growth 74, tissue morphogenesis 75 or supporting the development of somites in vertebrate embryos 76,77.
In conclusion, our work unveils a previously unnoticed contribution of the β(1,3)-glucanase Eng2 to the establishment of polarized growth. Altogether, we describe a component of the endocytic machinery that also impinges on the Cdc42-dependent polarized growth pathway in fission yeast, being necessary for Scd1–Scd2 tip localization and for Cdc42 activation and dynamics to sustain bipolar growth.
Materials and methods
Yeast strains and growth conditions
See Supplementary Table S1 for strain information. Yeast cells were grown on YES medium or minimal medium (EMM) with the required supplements 78. Construction of yeast strains was performed using standard procedures: either integration of cassettes or genetic crossing. For overexpression experiments using the nmt1+ promoter, cells were grown in EMM containing 15 μM thiamine up to the logarithmic phase. Then, the cells were harvested, washed three times with EMM, and inoculated in fresh medium (without thiamine) at an OD595 = 0.05. Synchronization of strains carrying the thermosensitive cdc10-129 mutation was achieved by growing the cells at the permissive temperature (25 °C) to early log phase (OD595 = 0.5) and then shifting the cultures to 36 °C for 4 h. Cells were released from arrest by transfer to 25 °C, and samples were taken at different times after release.
Plasmid constructions
Plasmid pJED21 contained eng2Δ1-36-mCherry was constructed by cloning a BamHI-SpeI fragment obtained from pJED14 that contained the C-terminal region of eng2+ and mCherry into the corresponding sites of pJED20 (Details about pJED20 plasmid construction can be consulted in Ref.49). Plasmid pJED22 contained the eng2-E537A-mCherry allele was constructed by recombinant PCR, generating the desired substitution in a BamHI-SpeI fragment, which was cloned into plasmid pJED14 (Details about pJED14 plasmid construction can be consulted in Ref.49).
For two-hybrid analysis, pob1+ ORF was cloned into the NdeI-SmaI sites of pAS2. scd2+ ORF was cloned into the BamHI sites of pAS2. The lsb1/csh3+ ORF was cloned into the SmaI sites of pAS2. eng2+ ORF was cloned into the SmaI sites of pACT2. Saccharomyces cerevisiae AH109 (MATa, trp1-901, leu2-3, 112, ura3-52, his3-200, gal4Δ, gal80Δ, LYS2::GAL1UAS-GAL1TATA-HIS3, GAL2UAS-GAL2TATA-ADE2, URA3::MEL1UAS-MEL1TATA-lacZ) was transformed and grown on plates without leucine, tryptophan, and histidine and supplemented with 40 mM 3-aminotriazole.
Western blotting
For immunoblotting, cells were grown to mid-log phase and cells were collected and resuspended in 5 ml of buffer E (50 mM sodium citrate, 100 mM sodium phosphate, pH 6.0, and 0.8 M sorbitol). Protoplasts were generated by incubation with Glucanex (1 mg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich) and Zymolyase-100 T (3 mg/ml; ICN Biomedicals) for 1 h. Then, the protoplasts were resuspended in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 8, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 1 mM DTT, 1 mM PMSF, 1 μg/ml aprotinin, 1 μg/ml leupeptin, 1 μg/ml pepstatin). Protein concentrations were determined using the BioRad Protein Assay kit (BioRad). 50 μg of protein extracts were resolved by SDS–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) on 10% gels and probed with anti-GFP (JL-8 Living Colors, Clontech), polyclonal DsRed (Living Colors, Clontech), anti-HA Rat monoclonal antibody (3F10, Roche) or anti-tubulin (Sigma 75168). Protein transfer, blotting, and chemiluminescence detection were performed using standard procedures 49.
Immunoprecipitation Eng2-Scd2
For immunoprecipitation of Scd2-Eng2, cells were grown to mid-log phase then were crosslinked with 1% formaldehyde for 10 min at 30 °C. The reaction was quenched by adding glycine to 250 mM and incubating for 5 min on ice. Cells were collected, washed and broken with glass beads in lysis buffer (25 mM Tris HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% SDS, 1% NP40, 1 mM PMSF, 1 μg/ml aprotinin, 1 μg/ml leupeptin, 1 μg/ml pepstatin). Clarified extracts were immunoprecipitated by adding 10 μl of GFP-Trap beads (Chromotek) for 1 h at 4 °C.The beads were washed six times with lysis buffer and resuspended in sample buffer. Samples were resolved by SDS-PAGE on 10% gels and probed with anti-GFP (JL-8 Living Colors, Clontech) and anti-HA (Anti-HA-Peroxidase High Affinity 3F10, Roche). Protein transfer, blotting, and chemiluminescence detection were performed using standard procedures.
Glutathione–sepharose (GS) pull-down and immunoprecipitation
The expression vector pGEX-Cdc42/Rac interactive binding (CRIB) 79 was used to transform E. coli and produce GST fused to the mammalian Pak2 binding domain for Cdc42. The fusion protein was produced according to the manufacturer’s instructions and immobilized on GS beads. The amount of GTP-bound Cdc42 was determined using a pull-down assay as described previously 26. In brief, extracts from Wild-Type or eng2Δ strains carrying integrated HA-cdc42 were obtained by using 500 μl of lysis buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 20 mM NaCl, 0.5% NP-40, 10% glycerol, 0.1 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM NaF and 2 mM Cl2Mg, containing 100 μM PMSF, leupeptin, and aprotinin). Cell extracts (2 mg of total protein) were incubated with 10 μg of GST–CRIB protein coupled to GS beads for 2 h, washed four times, and blotted with anti-HA antibody. Total HA-Cdc42 levels in whole-cell extracts (50 μg of total protein) were monitored by Western blot. Tubulin was used as loading control.
Microscopy
Samples were observed in wet preparations with a Personal Deltavision (Applied Precision, LLC) microscope equipped with a CoolSNAP HQ2 (Photometrics) camera and controlled with softWoRx Resolve 3D. Depending on the experiment, a single focal plane at the centre of the cell or a stack of 8–16 images covering the entire volume of the cell (z-series) with a spacing of 0.3–0.6 μm were captured. Stacks were deconvolved with softWoRx Resolve 3D and the maximum projection was generated.
Calcofluor white (Blankophor BBH, Bayer Corporation) staining was performed by adding 2 μl of a stock solution (10 mg/ml) to 100 μl of samples for 1 min, followed by a wash with phosphate buffer saline (PBS). Actin staining was performed with Alexa Fluor 488 phalloidin as previously described 80. Cells were fixed with 4% formaldehyde (EM-grade MeOH-Free, Polysciences) in PM buffer (35 mM K2HPO4, pH 6.8, 0.5 mM MgSO4) for 1 h at 25 °C. Then, cells were washed with PM buffer and permeabilized with PM buffer containing 1% Triton X-100 for 30 s. After three washes with PM buffer, 5 μl of Alexa Fluor 488 phalloidin (Molecular Probes) was added to 2 μl of cells and these were incubated for 1 h in the dark.
To analyze active Cdc42 oscillations at the tips, time-lapse experiments were performed with wild-type and eng2Δ cells expressing CRIB-GFP. Cells were placed in μ-Slide eight-wells coated with soybean lectin and imaged every 1 min over a 45-min period using a spinning-disk confocal microscope. Bipolar cells were selected (according to cell length), and the average CRIB-GFP intensity at the tips was measured using ImageJ software. Intensities from both tips were normalized to the maximum intensity and plotted against the time. Period and amplitude between oscillations were calculated from the plots, the period being the time between two subsequent maxima of intensity, and the amplitude being the difference between maximum and minimum intensities within the oscillation 81.
The cross-correlation coefficient was calculated to compare the correlation between two different matrixes, the fluorescence intensity in the old end “versus” the fluorescence intensity in the new end, both in WT and eng2Δ mutant cells. The Pearson correlation coefficient (p) was determined according to the formula:
where, Cov is the covariance, σx is the standard deviation of X and σY is the standard deviation of Y.
References
Rose, L. & Gonczy, P. Polarity establishment, asymmetric division and segregation of fate determinants in early C. elegans embryos. WormBook. https://doi.org/10.1895/wormbook.1.30.2 (2014).
Bi, E. & Park, H. O. Cell polarization and cytokinesis in budding yeast. Genetics 191, 347–387. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.111.132886 (2012).
Yamashita, Y. M., Yuan, H., Cheng, J. & Hunt, A. J. Polarity in stem cell division: Asymmetric stem cell division in tissue homeostasis. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2, a001313. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a001313 (2010).
Chiou, J. G., Balasubramanian, M. K. & Lew, D. J. Cell polarity in yeast. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 33, 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100616-060856 (2017).
Miller, K. E., Kang, P. J. & Park, H. O. Regulation of Cdc42 for polarized growth in budding yeast. Microbial Cell 7, 175–189. https://doi.org/10.15698/mic2020.07.722 (2020).
Yoshimura, T., Arimura, N. & Kaibuchi, K. Molecular mechanisms of axon specification and neuronal disorders. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1086, 116–125. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1377.013 (2006).
Tanos, B. & Rodriguez-Boulan, E. The epithelial polarity program: Machineries involved and their hijacking by cancer. Oncogene 27, 6939–6957. https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2008.345 (2008).
Tellkamp, F., Vorhagen, S. & Niessen, C. M. Epidermal polarity genes in health and disease. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 4, a015255. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a015255 (2014).
Yates, L. L. & Dean, C. H. Planar polarity: A new player in both lung development and disease. Organogenesis 7, 209–216. https://doi.org/10.4161/org.7.3.18462 (2011).
Vladar, E. K. & Konigshoff, M. Noncanonical Wnt planar cell polarity signaling in lung development and disease. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 48, 231–243. https://doi.org/10.1042/BST20190597 (2020).
Hachet, O., Bendezu, F. O. & Martin, S. G. Fission yeast: In shape to divide. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 24, 858–864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2012.10.001 (2012).
Martin, S. G. & Arkowitz, R. A. Cell polarization in budding and fission yeasts. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 38, 228–253. https://doi.org/10.1111/1574-6976.12055 (2014).
Mitchison, J. M. & Nurse, P. Growth in cell length in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. J. Cell Sci. 75, 357–376 (1985).
Martin, S. G., McDonald, W. H., Yates, J. R. 3rd. & Chang, F. Tea4p links microtubule plus ends with the formin for3p in the establishment of cell polarity. Dev. Cell 8, 479–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2005.02.008 (2005).
Mata, J. & Nurse, P. tea1 and the microtubular cytoskeleton are important for generating global spatial order within the fission yeast cell. Cell 89, 939–949 (1997).
Verde, F., Mata, J. & Nurse, P. Fission yeast cell morphogenesis: Identification of new genes and analysis of their role during the cell cycle. J. Cell Biol. 131, 1529–1538. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.131.6.1529 (1995).
Feierbach, B. & Chang, F. Roles of the fission yeast formin for3p in cell polarity, actin cable formation and symmetric cell division. Curr. Biol. 11, 1656–1665 (2001).
Martin, S. G., Rincon, S. A., Basu, R., Perez, P. & Chang, F. Regulation of the formin for3p by cdc42p and bud6p. Mol. Biol. Cell 18, 4155–4167. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E07-02-0094 (2007).
Rincón, S. A. et al. Pob1 participates in the Cdc42 regulation of fission yeast actin cytoskeleton. Mol. Biol. Cell 20, 4390–4399. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E09-03-0207 (2009).
Etienne-Manneville, S. Cdc42—The centre of polarity. J. Cell Sci. 117, 1291–1300. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.01115 (2004).
Wu, C. F. & Lew, D. J. Beyond symmetry-breaking: Competition and negative feedback in GTPase regulation. Trends Cell Biol. 23, 476–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2013.05.003 (2013).
Estravís, M., Rincón, S. & Pérez, P. Cdc42 regulation of polarized traffic in fission yeast. Commun. Integr. Biol. 5, 370–373. https://doi.org/10.4161/cib.19977 (2012).
Estravís, M., Rincón, S. A., Santos, B. & Pérez, P. Cdc42 regulates multiple membrane traffic events in fission yeast. Traffic 12, 1744–1758. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0854.2011.01275.x (2011).
Rincón, S. A., Estravís, M. & Pérez, P. Cdc42 regulates polarized growth and cell integrity in fission yeast. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 42, 201–205. https://doi.org/10.1042/BST20130155 (2014).
Chang, E. C. et al. Cooperative interaction of S. pombe proteins required for mating and morphogenesis. Cell 79, 131–141 (1994).
Coll, P. M., Trillo, Y., Ametzazurra, A. & Pérez, P. Gef1p, a new guanine nucleotide exchange factor for Cdc42p, regulates polarity in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol. Biol. Cell 14, 313–323. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e02-07-0400 (2003).
Hercyk, B. S., Rich-Robinson, J., Mitoubsi, A. S., Harrell, M. A. & Das, M. E. A novel interplay between GEFs orchestrates Cdc42 activity during cell polarity and cytokinesis in fission yeast. J. Cell Sci. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.236018 (2019).
Kelly, F. D. & Nurse, P. Spatial control of Cdc42 activation determines cell width in fission yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell 22, 3801–3811. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E11-01-0057 (2011).
Tay, Y. D., Leda, M., Goryachev, A. B. & Sawin, K. E. Local and global Cdc42 guanine nucleotide exchange factors for fission yeast cell polarity are coordinated by microtubules and the Tea1-Tea4-Pom1 axis. J. Cell Sci. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.216580 (2018).
Das, M. et al. Oscillatory dynamics of Cdc42 GTPase in the control of polarized growth. Science 337, 239–243. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1218377 (2012).
Bendezu, F. O. & Martin, S. G. Cdc42 oscillations in yeasts. Sci. Signal. 5, pe53. https://doi.org/10.1126/scisignal.2003630 (2012).
Khalili, B., Lovelace, H. D., Rutkowski, D. M., Holz, D. & Vavylonis, D. Fission yeast polarization: Modeling Cdc42 oscillations, symmetry breaking, and zones of activation and inhibition. Cells. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9081769 (2020).
Martin, S. G. Spontaneous cell polarization: Feedback control of Cdc42 GTPase breaks cellular symmetry. BioEssays News Rev. Mol. Cell. Dev. Biol. 37, 1193–1201. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.201500077 (2015).
Mukherjee, D., Sen, A. & Aguilar, R. C. RhoGTPase-binding proteins, the exocyst complex and polarized vesicle trafficking. Small GTPases 5, e28453. https://doi.org/10.4161/sgtp.28453 (2014).
Nishida-Fukuda, H. The Exocyst: Dynamic machine or static tethering complex? BioEssays News Rev. Mol. Cell. Dev. Biol. 41, e1900056. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.201900056 (2019).
Polgar, N. & Fogelgren, B. Regulation of cell polarity by exocyst-mediated trafficking. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect. Biol. 10, a031401. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a031401 (2018).
Zhang, X. et al. Membrane association and functional regulation of Sec3 by phospholipids and Cdc42. J. Cell Biol. 180, 145–158. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200704128 (2008).
Bendezu, F. O., Vincenzetti, V. & Martin, S. G. Fission yeast Sec3 and Exo70 are transported on actin cables and localize the exocyst complex to cell poles. PLoS ONE 7, e40248. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040248 (2012).
He, B. et al. Exo70p mediates the secretion of specific exocytic vesicles at early stages of the cell cycle for polarized cell growth. J. Cell Biol. 176, 771–777. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200606134 (2007).
Bendezu, F. O. & Martin, S. G. Actin cables and the exocyst form two independent morphogenesis pathways in the fission yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell 22, 44–53. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E10-08-0720 (2011).
Jourdain, I., Dooley, H. C. & Toda, T. Fission yeast sec3 bridges the exocyst complex to the actin cytoskeleton. Traffic 13, 1481–1495. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0854.2012.01408.x (2012).
Castagnetti, S., Behrens, R. & Nurse, P. End4/Sla2 is involved in establishment of a new growth zone in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. J. Cell Sci. 118, 1843–1850. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.02311 (2005).
Codlin, S., Haines, R. L. & Mole, S. E. btn1 affects endocytosis, polarization of sterol-rich membrane domains and polarized growth in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Traffic 9, 936–950. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0854.2008.00735.x (2008).
Takeda, T. & Chang, F. Role of fission yeast myosin I in organization of sterol-rich membrane domains. Curr. Biol. 15, 1331–1336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2005.07.009 (2005).
Aguilar, R. C. et al. Epsin N-terminal homology domains perform an essential function regulating Cdc42 through binding Cdc42 GTPase-activating proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 4116–4121. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0510513103 (2006).
Jose, M., Tollis, S., Nair, D., Sibarita, J. B. & McCusker, D. Robust polarity establishment occurs via an endocytosis-based cortical corralling mechanism. J. Cell Biol. 200, 407–418. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201206081 (2013).
Harris, K. P. & Tepass, U. Cdc42 and vesicle trafficking in polarized cells. Traffic 11, 1272–1279. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0854.2010.01102.x (2010).
del Dedo, J. E., Dueñas, E., Arnáiz, Y., del Rey, F. & de Aldana, C. R. V. β-glucanase Eng2 is required for ascus wall endolysis after sporulation in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Eukaryot. Cell 8, 1278–1286. https://doi.org/10.1128/EC.00148-09 (2009).
del Dedo, J. E. et al. Eng2 is a component of a dynamic protein complex required for endocytic uptake in fission yeast. Traffic 15, 1122–1142. https://doi.org/10.1111/tra.12198 (2014).
Nurse, P., Thuriaux, P. & Nasmyth, K. Genetic control of the cell division cycle in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol. Gen. Genet. 146, 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00268085 (1976).
Glynn, J. M., Lustig, R. J., Berlin, A. & Chang, F. Role of bud6p and tea1p in the interaction between actin and microtubules for the establishment of cell polarity in fission yeast. Curr. Biol. 11, 836–845. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0960-9822(01)00235-4 (2001).
Behrens, R. & Nurse, P. Roles of fission yeast tea1p in the localization of polarity factors and in organizing the microtubular cytoskeleton. J. Cell Biol. 157, 783–793. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200112027 (2002).
Win, T. Z., Gachet, Y., Mulvihill, D. P., May, K. M. & Hyams, J. S. Two type V myosins with non-overlapping functions in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe: Myo52 is concerned with growth polarity and cytokinesis, Myo51 is a component of the cytokinetic actin ring. J. Cell Sci. 114, 69–79 (2001).
Cortés, J. C. et al. The novel fission yeast (1,3)beta-D-glucan synthase catalytic subunit Bgs4p is essential during both cytokinesis and polarized growth. J. Cell Sci. 118, 157–174. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.01585 (2005).
Pérez, P. & Rincón, S. A. Rho GTPases: Regulation of cell polarity and growth in yeasts. Biochem. J. 426, 243–253. https://doi.org/10.1042/BJ20091823 (2010).
Goryachev, A. B. & Leda, M. Many roads to symmetry breaking: Molecular mechanisms and theoretical models of yeast cell polarity. Mol. Biol. Cell 28, 370–380. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E16-10-0739 (2017).
Brown, J. L., Jaquenoud, M., Gulli, M. P., Chant, J. & Peter, M. Novel Cdc42-binding proteins Gic1 and Gic2 control cell polarity in yeast. Genes Dev. 11, 2972–2982. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.11.22.2972 (1997).
Tatebe, H., Nakano, K., Maximo, R. & Shiozaki, K. Pom1 DYRK regulates localization of the Rga4 GAP to ensure bipolar activation of Cdc42 in fission yeast. Curr. Biol. 18, 322–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2008.02.005 (2008).
Martín-Cuadrado, A. B. et al. Characterization of the endo-beta-1,3-glucanase activity of S. cerevisiae Eng2 and other members of the GH81 family. Fungal Genet. Biol. 45, 542–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fgb.2007.09.001 (2008).
Mayer, B. J. SH3 domains: Complexity in moderation. J. Cell Sci. 114, 1253–1263 (2001).
Endo, M., Shirouzu, M. & Yokoyama, S. The Cdc42 binding and scaffolding activities of the fission yeast adaptor protein Scd2. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 843–852. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M209714200 (2003).
Wheatley, E. & Rittinger, K. Interactions between Cdc42 and the scaffold protein Scd2: Requirement of SH3 domains for GTPase binding. Biochem. J. 388, 177–184. https://doi.org/10.1042/BJ20041838 (2005).
Vo, T. V. et al. A proteome-wide fission yeast interactome reveals network evolution principles from yeasts to human. Cell 164, 310–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.11.037 (2016).
Kelly, F. D. & Nurse, P. D. novo growth zone formation from fission yeast spheroplasts. PLoS ONE 6, e27977. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027977 (2011).
Campanale, J. P., Sun, T. Y. & Montell, D. J. Development and dynamics of cell polarity at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 130, 1201–1207. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.188599 (2017).
Scheffler, K., Recouvreux, P., Paoletti, A. & Tran, P. T. Oscillatory AAA+ ATPase Knk1 constitutes a novel morphogenetic pathway in fission yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111, 17899–17904. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1407226111 (2014).
Huang, T. Y., Renaud-Young, M. & Young, D. Nak1 interacts with Hob1 and Wsp1 to regulate cell growth and polarity in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. J. Cell Sci. 118, 199–210. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.01608 (2005).
Koch, C. A., Anderson, D., Moran, M. F., Ellis, C. & Pawson, T. SH2 and SH3 domains: Elements that control interactions of cytoplasmic signaling proteins. Science 252, 668–674. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1708916 (1991).
Attanapola, S. L., Alexander, C. J. & Mulvihill, D. P. Ste20-kinase-dependent TEDS-site phosphorylation modulates the dynamic localisation and endocytic function of the fission yeast class I myosin, Myo1. J. Cell Sci. 122, 3856–3861. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.053959 (2009).
Hercyk, B. S. & Das, M. E. F-BAR Cdc15 promotes Cdc42 activation during cytokinesis and cell polarization in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Genetics 213, 1341–1356. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.119.302649 (2019).
Duan, X. et al. Essential role of the endocytic site-associated protein Ecm25 in stress-induced cell elongation. Cell Rep 35, 109122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109122 (2021).
Lamas, I., Merlini, L., Vjestica, A., Vincenzetti, V. & Martin, S. G. Optogenetics reveals Cdc42 local activation by scaffold-mediated positive feedback and Ras GTPase. PLoS Biol. 18, e3000600. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000600 (2020).
Howell, A. S. et al. Negative feedback enhances robustness in the yeast polarity establishment circuit. Cell 149, 322–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.03.012 (2012).
Hwang, J. U., Gu, Y., Lee, Y. J. & Yang, Z. Oscillatory ROP GTPase activation leads the oscillatory polarized growth of pollen tubes. Mol. Biol. Cell 16, 5385–5399. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e05-05-0409 (2005).
He, L., Wang, X., Tang, H. L. & Montell, D. J. Tissue elongation requires oscillating contractions of a basal actomyosin network. Nat. Cell Biol. 12, 1133–1142. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb2124 (2010).
Lewis, J. Autoinhibition with transcriptional delay: A simple mechanism for the zebrafish somitogenesis oscillator. Curr. Biol. 13, 1398–1408. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0960-9822(03)00534-7 (2003).
Lewis, J., Hanisch, A. & Holder, M. Notch signaling, the segmentation clock, and the patterning of vertebrate somites. J. Biol. 8, 44. https://doi.org/10.1186/jbiol145 (2009).
Moreno, S., Klar, A. & Nurse, P. Molecular genetic analysis of fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Methods Enzymol. 194, 795–823. https://doi.org/10.1016/0076-6879(91)94059-l (1991).
Manser, E. et al. PAK kinases are directly coupled to the PIX family of nucleotide exchange factors. Mol. Cell 1, 183–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80019-2 (1998).
Marks, J., Hagan, I. M. & Hyams, J. S. Growth polarity and cytokinesis in fission yeast: The role of the cytoskeleton. J. Cell Sci. Suppl. 5, 229–241. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.1986.supplement_5.15 (1986).
Revilla-Guarinos, M. T. et al. Rga6 is a fission yeast rho GAP involved in Cdc42 regulation of polarized growth. Mol. Biol. Cell. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E15-12-0818 (2016).
Acknowledgements
We thank to Rebeca Martín and Sergio Rincón for critical reading and comments about the manuscript. This research was supported by Grants BIO2015-70195-C2-1-R from the Comisión Interministerial de Ciencia y Tecnología to CRV, PGC2018-098924-B-I00 from the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación to PPG and CSI150P20 from the Junta de Castilla y León, Spain, and by the European Regional Development Fund (FEDER) to PPG. PG was recipient of a postdoctoral contract from program II of Universidad de Salamanca. JED was recipient of a postdoctoral contract from Junta de Castilla y León (Spain).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
P.G. and P.M.C. led the project and conducted most of the experimental work; F.d.R. and M.I.G. collaborated on some experiments; P.P., C.R.V. and J.E.d.D. conceived and designed the study and analyzed the data. M.I.G, P.P., C.R.V. and J.E.d.D. wrote the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the version of the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
García, P., Coll, P.M., del Rey, F. et al. Eng2, a new player involved in feedback loop regulation of Cdc42 activity in fission yeast. Sci Rep 11, 17872 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-97311-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-97311-6
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.