Abstract
Urinary bladder wound healing relies on multiple biological events that are finely tuned in a spatial–temporal manner. MicroRNAs are small non-coding RNA molecules with regulatory functions. We hypothesized that microRNAs are important molecules in the coordination of normal urinary bladder wound healing. We aimed at identifying microRNAs expressed during bladder wound healing using Affymetrix global array for microRNA profiling of the rodent urinary bladder during healing of a surgically created wound. Results were validated in the rat bladders by real-time PCR (RT-PCR) using three of the differentially expressed (DE) microRNAs. The model was thereafter validated in human cells, by measuring the expression of eight of the DE microRNAs upon in vitro wound-healing assays in primary urothelial cells. Our results indicated that 508 (40%) of all rodent microRNAs were expressed in the urinary bladder during wound healing. Thirteen of these microRNAs (1%) were DE (false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.05, P < 0.05, |logfold|> 0.25) in wounded compared to non-wounded bladders. Bioinformatic analyses helped us to identify target molecules for the DE microRNAs, and biological pathways involved in tissue repair. All data are made available in an open-access database for other researchers to explore.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Engineered cell-seeded grafts have been introduced to treat several urogenital disorders1,2. The final outcome of any transplanted tissue or engineered graft greatly depends on the host wound healing response. Wound healing in adult tissue is a multistep process comprising overlapping cellular responses including hemostasis, inflammation, cellular proliferation, extracellular matrix synthesis and remodeling. In a normal wound, once the hemostasis and inflammation steps have ensued, proliferation and cellular migration take over and replace the damaged tissue. Eventually, the proliferation ceases and the tissue matures with scar formation.
In the rodent urinary bladder, the healing process is highly similar to what has been observed in the skin, at both a morphological and a molecular level3,4. Due to their reliability and reproducibility, rodent models are frequently used in biomedical research5. In comparison to the human genome, the rat genome encodes a similar number of protein-coding genes (22,000 for rats, 20,000 for humans)5,6. Molecular and developmental processes in rodents are well characterized and share great similarities with humans7. Similarly, healing and trauma models in rats have proven translationally valuable for human wound healing and trauma research8,9,10,11.
The knowledge about the molecular mechanisms that coordinate bladder healing may be highly relevant to the clinical practice. It may help us understand conditions, such as chronic cystitis and post-irradiation cystitis, and it may improve the surgical treatments of congenital conditions, such as bladder exstrophy. Further understanding of micro-molecular events may unlock the development of pharmaceuticals for treating the diseased urinary bladder.
The non-coding small RNA molecules (19–23 nucleotides long), known as microRNAs, are important players during tissue homeostasis. These molecules act as epigenetic regulators of gene expression at the post-transcriptional level12. Mature microRNA molecules can target the degradation of complementary messenger RNAs (mRNA) or by inhibiting the interaction between mRNA and the translational machinery (down-regulating control)13. MicroRNAs interact mainly with the 3’untranslated region of target mRNAs, but the molecules can also interact with other coding and promoter regions of the genes12. A single microRNA can target hundreds of mRNAs, and a single gene can also be targeted by different microRNAs14.
MicroRNAs have been intensively studied and today we understand that these molecules regulate several cellular and developmental pathways. MicroRNAs have shown differing expression patterns during tissue repair in bones15,16, lungs17 skin18,19 and oral mucosa20. These molecules mostly contribute to tissue repair by coordinating cell proliferation and inflammation among other functions18,19,21,22. Today, only a few studies address the molecular signatures during tissue repair of the urinary bladder in a comprehensive way, and the contribution of microRNAs in normal bladder healing has, to our knowledge, not been explored3,23.
In our previous study, we histologically evaluated the wound healing pattern in the rat urinary bladder and characterized the expression of 84 mRNA wound healing related genes3.
In this study, we hypothesized, that we could expand our understanding of the regulatory networks governing urinary bladder healing, by identifying differentially expressed microRNAs in vivo and validating the findings in human bladder healing models in vitro. In doing so, we aimed at generating a large pool of bioinformatic data, and to make it available for other researchers in order to inspire and stimulate further investigations. We identified several potential microRNA markers and targets in the data set and other researchers within the field are encouraged to continue its exploration.
Results
MicroRNA molecular changes
We generated a microarray data set using rat bladder tissue at three different time points post wounding (Fig. 1).
Significant differential gene expressions were observed between control and wounded bladders at every time point analyzed: 6 h, 2 days, and 8 days (Fig. 2).
The global microRNA expression patterns were studied further using a heatmap and hierarchical clustering, revealing similar results as the principal component analysis (PCA) (Fig. 2a,b). In addition to identifying the DE microRNAs, we analyzed the 40 highest expressed microRNAs (supplementary fig. S1). These top microRNAs targeted roughly 5000 genes and differences between the expressions were not significant (supplementary table S1). The Gene Ontology terms (GO) terms related to the target genes indicated relevant functions such as “wound healing” (GO:0042060), “morphogenesis of an epithelial sheet” (GO:0002011) and “regulation of endothelial cell differentiation” (GO:0045601) (supplementary table S2).
PCA was performed to assess the overall microRNA expression patterns (Fig. 2b), indicating clear grouping based on timepoints. However, there was a considerable variation between replicates, indicating variation on an individual level. Notably, the first principal component (explaining 16% of the total variance) had biological interpretation and was responsible for separating the controls from the wounded individuals. The most significant changes occurred during the early phase of the healing process, mostly at 6 h and 2 days, while at 8 days, fewer DE genes were encountered (Fig. 2c).
In total, 133 DE microRNA genes were observed at 6 h, 153 at 2 days and 99 at 8 days (p < 0.05). FDR corrected p-values narrowed down the list to 9, 5 and 5 after 6 h, 2 days and 8 days, respectively. Altogether, 13 DE microRNAs passed our strength criteria for selection (FDR < 0.05, P < 0.05, |logfold|> 0.25) (Fig. 2d,e and Table 1).
Significantly DE microRNAs at 6 h, 2 days, and 8 days post wounding (with corresponding fold change, p-values, and false discovery rates) have been compiled in the supplementary tables S3-5.
Target prediction and biological pathway enrichment
Using the online database for predicted microRNA targets: miRDB v6.0, we identified hundreds of mRNA coding genes that could be targeted for most of the DE microRNAs at the three time points examined (Table 2). Next, we evaluated the overlap between the predicted mRNA target with our previously reported DE mRNA during bladder healing and identified pairs of microRNA/mRNAs for further hypothesis generation and validation3 (Table 3). Furthermore, functional GO enrichment analysis on the predicted DE microRNA targets revealed several biological functions and processes relevant for tissue repair, such as epithelial migration, proliferation, stress response, differentiation, and angiogenesis (Fig. 3). The complete lists of all enriched Panther-GO terms at each time point in this study have been included in supplementary tables S6-8. We next performed an enrichment pathway analysis with the target genes for the DE microRNAs using Reactome, a curated data base of pathways and reactions in human biology24. Relevant biological pathways were enriched in our set of data. At 6 h and 2 days, signaling pathways, such as PI3k/AKT and ERK, which are involved in proliferation, migration and angiogenesis25,26,27, were represented (supplementary table S9). Furthermore, the E2F family of transcription factors, which regulates the transition from G1 to the S phase of the cell cycle, were significantly represented in the group of genes at day 2 (supplementary table S10). Another relevant biological pathway represented at days 2 and 8 was the nuclear receptor transcription signal, which is a key molecule in the regulation of cutaneous healing28 (supplementary table S10). Furthermore, a family member of the RUNX transcription factors, Runx1, which was found to regulate EMT marker genes and renal fibrosis, was among the most interesting biological pathways at day 8 (supplementary table S11)29.
Validation of the microRNA array by RT-PCR
The expressions of three of the DE microRNAs were validated in rat bladder tissue and were consistent with the Affymetrix array results. We validated rno-miR-92b-5p, which had the highest up-regulation and two microRNAs with the most down-regulated patterns: rno-miR-141-3p, and rno-miR-200a-3p (Fig. 4).
The relevance of 8 of the DE (Table 4) microRNAs in human cells was confirmed by analyzing their expression in primary human urothelial cells upon in vitro wounding (Fig. 5) at 6, 12 and at 24 h post wounding. Three of these microRNAs were chosen for validation due to their role in wound healing in other tissues (miR202, miR-221 and miR141).
Discussion
While the role of microRNAs in skin wound healing has been extensively studied, their role in urinary bladder healing has, to our knowledge, not been previously explored. We therefore investigated the transcriptomic changes in microRNAs during normal bladder wound healing in a rodent model and validated the results with human cells.
By using Affymetrix microRNA array technology and a rodent model, we identified the microRNA expression profile at 6 h, 2 days, and 8 days post-wounding. These time points were chosen based on our previous rodent bladder wound healing study and selected to represent the three different stages of wound healing (inflammation, proliferation, and early tissue remodeling)3. We previously validated that these timepoints capture each specific stage histologically and at the mRNA level, however, some late-stage remodeling features, such as fibrosis, are likely underrepresented at day 8.
The total number of DE microRNAs was limited to nine, five and five microRNAs at 6 h, 2 days, and 8 days, respectively, corresponding to a total of 13 unique microRNAs (rno-miR-92b-5p, rno-miR-139, rno-miR-141-3p, rno-miR-182, rno-miR-1949, rno-miR-200a-3p, rno-miR-200b-3p, rno-miR-203a-3p, rno-miR-214-3p, rno-miR-297, rno-miR-338-5p, rno-miR-3473, rno-miR-6215).
Microarray technology was used in this study because it offers a comprehensive coverage of all known mature microRNA sequences in the miRbase, with an easy analysis flow and a small sample input. New technologies, such as RNA sequencing, could potentially be used in the future to discover new microRNA molecules that are currently unknown.
At the selected three time points, we saw a general pattern of microRNA down-regulation with only a few up-regulated microRNAs. A physiological explanation could be that most of the DE microRNAs are suppressors of wound healing and are turned off as a response to injury to allow a healing response.
In a review of the literature on known functions of the DE microRNAs we found that some of these microRNAs participate in wound healing in other tissues such as skin and bone tissue. Two examples are the miR-200 family members and miR-203. The miR-200 family consists of epithelium-specific microRNAs, acting as negative regulators of epithelial-mesenchymal transition, and also regulates keratinocyte migration, proliferation and differentiation30. MiR-203 is expressed in skin and other squamous epithelia and is described as an important microRNA for epidermal differentiation and suppresses epithelial stem cell proliferation31,32,33,34. Its expression is drastically enhanced in the tissue surrounding a wound35.
The other DE microRNAs are, as of today, not as well-described, but are expressed in other processes relevant to tissue healing such as inflammation (miR-297, miR-3473, miR-338); smooth muscle differentiation or proliferation (miR-214, miR-139, miR-141); epithelial cell proliferation (miR-139, miR-92b); stem cell proliferation (miR-139); and fibroblast proliferation and migration (miR-214). Some have also been proposed as potential biomarkers for kidney injury (miR-3473) or potentially having a role in different cancers by modulating genes involved in migration, invasion, and proliferation of cancer cells (miR-139, miR-214, miR-1949, miR-141). One of the DE microRNAs has not yet been associated to any specific function but is known to be expressed in the kidneys (miR-6215) (Table 1).
It is worth noticing, that some relevant microRNAs were likely missed due to the chosen strength parameters for selecting DE genes (FDR < 0.05, P < 0.05, |logfold|> 0.25), that only detected high-scale changes. Several of these wound related microRNAs had a significant and informative differential expression and allowed to differentiate controls from wounded animals (supplementary fig. S2). For example, the microRNAs miR-146, miR-184, miR-202, miR-204, miR-205 and miR-221, have been previously reported as important players in tissue healing36,37,38,39. These microRNAs control processes such as inflammatory response, proliferation, angiogenesis, migration, or apoptosis. The expression of some of these microRNAs showed a differential expression between wounded versus non-wounded urinary bladders in our studies, however, they were not included in the list of the DE microRNAs, due to failure to pass the strength parameters for selection. Since these microRNAs are potentially relevant for wound healing in the urinary bladder, we included 3 of them in our panel for validation in human urothelial cells (miR-202, miR-221 and miR-146).
We found a high level of agreement of the microRNA expressions between human urothelial cells in vitro and rat bladder healing in vivo in the early phases of healing. Two out of three microRNAs had the same expression patterns, and this could indicate a potential role for these microRNAs in human urinary tissue healing as well.
Given the larger agreement between DE microRNA expression profiles in rat and human cells detected in the early time points, we believe that our experimental model was best suited for modeling the inflammation and proliferation stages of human wound healing.
Methodological weaknesses include the inherent issues associated to the hybridization-based platforms of microarrays (high background and cross-hybridization issues). They also demand stringent filtering to allow good confidence of results, which may be at the expense of biologically important information.
In this study, we validated our results in commercially available human cells to procure clinical relevance using a simplified model of in vitro wounding. Although the model cannot re-create the complexity of the in vivo wound healing events it does provide clues on the involvement of the DE microRNAs in epithelial migration and proliferation, which is an important event during the early phase of wound healing. Whole human bladder 3D culture models may be relevant in future studies.
Currently there are thousands of European and US patents related to microRNA targeting in cancer and other diseases. MicroRNA based therapeutics are at present in preclinical and clinical trials. For example, two drugs targeting members of the miR-92 family, are currently in clinical trials, for the treatment of peripheral arterial disease and controlling ischemia, respectively (miRAgen therapeutics Inc, CO, US)40.
The clinical relevance of our findings will need further elucidation, both within basic science and clinical studies, however, above-mentioned ongoing trials indirectly supports the role of targeting microRNA for influencing tissue hemostasis and function also in the bladder.
In conclusion, we investigated total microRNA gene expression during urinary bladder healing in a rodent model. We identified several DE microRNAs previously associated with wound healing and tissue repair, and DE microRNAs that were not previously associated with wound healing and tissue repair.
Bioinformatic analysis on the set of the target genes for the DE microRNAs indicates key molecules for extracellular matrix regulation (RUNX), proliferation (EF2, ERK) and angiogenesis (PI3k/AKT). Further studies will be needed to test the involvement of DE microRNAs in those processes.
MicroRNAs, identified in this study, could have clinical relevance in their use as therapeutic tools for regulating urogenital tissue inflammation and tissue healing. For example, they may improve the postoperative outcomes after hypospadias repair, bladder exstrophy repair or bladder augmentation. They may also play a role in chronic inflammation such as in radiation cystitis, cystitis cystica or painful bladder syndrome and influence research initiatives within regenerative medicine. Additional functional analysis will be required to increase our understanding of the specific mechanisms associated with each of the identified microRNAs in bladder repair, and therefore our data is made publicly available for other researchers to explore.
Methods
Ethics
This study was approved by the National animal ethics laws and Institutional regulations on animal studies (Stockholm County Committee on Animal Research, 20150703 Reg. N107/15).
All methods were performed in accordance with commonly accepted norms of veterinary best practice. The experiments were carried out at the Unit for comparative Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Solna Sweden. The study was carried out in compliance with the ARRIVE guidelines41.
Animals and urinary bladder wound model
Male Sprague–Dawley rats (approximately 400 g) were used in the experiments as described in previous communications3. The animals were divided into two groups: bladder wounded and sham operated animals. Several time points (0 h, 6 h, 2 days, 8 days, 14 days, and 28 days) after wounding of the bladder were studied. Four animals were included per time point and experimental condition and the study design is described in a schematic drawing (Fig. 1). Rats were anesthetized by inhalation of isoflurane (Virbac, Carros, France) and kept on isoflurane by mask inhalation during the whole surgical procedure. Surgery was performed under sterile conditions. An abdominal incision was made in the lower midline using a scalpel. Subsequently, the bladder was mobilized out of the wound and a 1 cm long longitudinal incision through all layers of the bladder was created from the anterior bladder neck up to the bladder dome. The incision was then closed with a continuous 7-0 nylon suture (Ethicon, Somerville, NJ). Local anesthesia with bupivacaine (Marcaine) (Astra Zeneca, Södertälje, Sweden) was applied in the subcutaneous tissue before closure of the abdominal wall. The rectus muscle and skin were closed sequentially with continuous 4‐0 absorbable Vicryl suture (Ethicon, Somerville, NJ). Sham operations included an equivalent procedure at all steps except the incision and suturing of the bladder.
The rats were euthanized with carbon dioxide at the above indicated time points after the initial intervention, bladder biopsies including the wound were harvested and stored in RNAlater (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) until RNA extraction. Samples from 6 h, 2 days and 8 days after wounding were used for all microRNA array analyses. RNAs extracted from all the time points including 14 days and 24 days were used for the validation studies.
Until the end of the study, no complications related to the surgical interventions or bladder operations were detected in any animals.
RNA extraction
Bladder tissue biopsies were homogenized as previously described 3, using a Tissue Lyser, (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) before RNA extraction. Total RNA was extracted using the Qiazol Lysis Reagent® (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA), following the manufacturer’s instructions. The quantity of RNA was determined using the NanoDrop® ND-1000 Spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies inc, Wilmington, DE). RNA integrity (RIN) was determined using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyser (RNA 6000 Nano LabChip kit, Agilent Technologies).
MicroRNA profiling by Affymetrix® GeneChip® microRNA Arrays
The Affymetrix microRNA GeneChip Array plates (Affymetrix, Thermo Fisher) were used in this study according to the manufacturer’s instructions at the core facility for Bioinformatics and Expression Analysis (BEA, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden). In brief, two hundred micrograms of total RNA from bladder samples (collected after 6 h, 2 days and 8 days post wounding) were biotin-labeled for the Affymetrix GeneChip microRNA array 4.1 using the FlashTag biotin-HSR RNA labeling kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Each microarray contained sequences to interrogate all mature microRNA sequences in MiRBase Release 17. Hybridization, washing, and scanning of slides were performed according to the Affymetrix protocols. The scanned images were processed using the Affymetrix GeneChip Command Console. CEL files from scanning were imported to Transcriptome Analysis Console (TAC v4.00) and analyzed using the RMA method, that generated signals and Detection Above Background (DABG) p-values. Wounded and non-wounded bladders were compared for each time point using the Moderate t-test and the false discovery rates were calculated.
Bioinformatic analysis, detection of DE microRNAs
The raw data were analyzed using the Applied BioSystems Transcriptome Analysis Console (TAC) software as described above. The TAC software was used to determine the intensity levels of each probe in each individual, and to perform differential expression analysis between different conditions and time points, and to filter probes not displaying a signal in any of the individuals.
To provide information on the overall structure of the analyzed data set, several common methods for analysis of gene expression of microarray data were implemented using custom scripts by using the R ggplot package42. The method included a principal component analysis (PCA), that is a dimensionality reduction technique providing information on the direction of the highest variability in the data. By these means, the first component contained genes describing the most variation, the second a bit less, and the last component containing genes with very little variation.
Heatmaps and hierarchical clusters of genes with similar expression patterns and genes that were more similar were placed together in a dendrogram. Branches in the dendrogram represented similarities in gene expression patterns.
Volcano plots were used to display the statistical significance and the magnitude of gene expression changes and allowed for rapid visualization and identification of genes with large fold changes, that were also significant.
Next, the data was searched for DE microRNAs. Any microRNA displaying a p-value < 0.05, and absolute fold change > 0.25 was considered DE. The resulting DE microRNA was then analyzed with two separate settings: first, the DE microRNA underwent FDR correction, (setting an FDR threshold at < 0.05), and next, the microRNA was analyzed using no FDR correction.
The gene targets of these microRNAs were determined using the Rattus Norvegicus microRNA targets as listed in miRDB v6.043.
The resulting gene target list were analyzed using the microRNA target filter tool of QIAGEN’s Ingenuity Pathway Analysis software in combination with a list of 84 mRNA gene expression data from previously published work3. Lastly, the targets of the FDR corrected DE microRNA were analyzed using the PANTHER GO biological process enrichment tool (pantherdb.org) as well as the REACTOME pathway analysis tool (https://reactome.org/PathwayBrowser/#TOOL=AT).
Validation of DE microRNAs by quantitative RT-PCR
Quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase–PCR was performed as described previously44. In brief, the total RNA from rat bladder samples and from primary human urothelial cells was reversely transcribed using the TaqMan microRNA reverse transcription kit and the multiplex RT primer pool containing microRNA specific stem-loop primers (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Foster City, CA). Thereafter, the expression of each microRNA was determined by TaqMan expression assays (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and normalized based on the values of U6 small nuclear RNA (in all rat samples) and the RNU48 (in all human samples) Information for all the TaqMan assays used in this study can be found in Table 4.
Human primary urothelial cell culture
Primary human urothelial cells (Catalog #4320) and supplements were purchased from ScienCell Research Laboratories and cultured at a minimum density of 5,000 cells/ cm2 in a poly-L-lysine (Catalog #041) coated culture flask and using Urothelial Cell Medium (UCM, Catalog #4321) and growth factor supplements (Catalog #4352). Cells were used for the experiments at passage number four.
In vitro wound healing assay in human urothelial cells
Sub-confluent primary urothelial cells were plated into 35 mm poly-L-lysine-coated culture dishes at a density of 40,000 cells/cm2. 24 h after plating, the cells formed a 100% confluent monolayer. The monolayer was scraped with seven straight longitudinal and seven straight vertical lines with a p200 pipet tip. The cellular debris was removed from the petri dishes by washing twice with 1 × PBS and 2 ml of urothelial cell medium without cell growth supplements added to the plates. After 6, 12 and 24 h, the cells were harvested for RNA extraction and gene expression analysis as described above.
Statistical analysis
The statistical significance in the RT-PCR analysis of selected microRNA molecules in both rat bladder and human urothelial cells was evaluated by calculating the average normalized gene expression values in each biological replicate and time point. These data were imported in the Prism 5.0 software (GraphPad, San Diego, CA). The nonparametric Mann–Whitney U test was used to evaluate the significance of microRNA genes of wounded vs. control groups. The bars represent the average values of gene expression and their respective standard deviation.
Data availability
The microarray data can be found at Gene Expression Omnibus (GSE176515).
References
Saba, I., Bolduc, S. & Orabi, H. Stem cell therapy and tissue engineering in urogenital diseases. In Advances in Stem Cell Therapy Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine (ed. El-Badri, N.) (Humana Press, 2017).
Adamowicz, J. et al. Concise review: Tissue engineering of urinary bladder; we still have a long way to go?. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 6(11), 2033–2043 (2017).
Chamorro, C. I., Reinfeldt Engberg, G. & Fossum, M. Molecular and histological studies of bladder wound healing in a rodent model. Wound Repair Regen. 28(3), 293–306 (2020).
Bilbao, M. et al. Histology surrounding cystotomy healing in a Sprague-Dawley rat model. Int. Urogynecol. J. 25(1), 97–101 (2014).
Weber, B. et al. Modeling trauma in rats: Similarities to humans and potential pitfalls to consider. J. Transl. Med. 17(1), 305 (2019).
Gibbs, R. A. et al. Genome sequence of the Brown Norway rat yields insights into mammalian evolution. Nature 428(6982), 493–521 (2004).
Lindblad-Toh, K. Genome sequencing: Three’s company. Nature 428(6982), 475–476 (2004).
Abdullahi, A., Amini-Nik, S. & Jeschke, M. G. Animal models in burn research. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 71(17), 3241–3255 (2014).
Morgan, C. E. et al. Development and validation of 4 different rat models of uncontrolled hemorrhage. JAMA Surg. 150(4), 316–324 (2015).
Pritchard, J. J. Repair of fractures of the parietal bone in rats. J. Anat. 80(2), 55–60 (1946).
Wang, N. D. et al. Blunt chest trauma: An experimental model for heart and lung contusion. J. Trauma 54(4), 744–748 (2003).
Catalanotto, C., Cogoni, C. & Zardo, G. MicroRNA in control of gene expression: An overview of nuclear functions. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 17, 10 (2016).
Jonas, S. & Izaurralde, E. Towards a molecular understanding of microRNA-mediated gene silencing. Nat. Rev. Genet. 16(7), 421–433 (2015).
O’Brien, J. et al. Overview of MicroRNA biogenesis, mechanisms of actions, and circulation. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne) 9, 402 (2018).
Hadjiargyrou, M., Zhi, J. & Komatsu, D. E. Identification of the microRNA transcriptome during the early phases of mammalian fracture repair. Bone 87, 78–88 (2016).
Waki, T. et al. Profiling microRNA expression during fracture healing. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 17, 83 (2016).
Langwinski, W. et al. Comparison of miRNA profiling during airway epithelial repair in undifferentiated and differentiated cells in vitro. J. Appl. Genet. 58(2), 205–212 (2017).
Li, D. et al. MicroRNA-31 promotes skin wound healing by enhancing keratinocyte proliferation and migration. J. Invest. Dermatol. 135(6), 1676–1685 (2015).
Li, D. et al. MicroRNA-132 enhances transition from inflammation to proliferation during wound healing. J. Clin. Invest. 125(8), 3008–3026 (2015).
Simões, A. et al. Differential microRNA profile underlies the divergent healing responses in skin and oral mucosal wounds. Sci. Rep. 9(1), 7160 (2019).
Landen, N. X., Li, D. & Stahle, M. Transition from inflammation to proliferation: A critical step during wound healing. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 73(20), 3861–3885 (2016).
Chen, L. et al. Overexpression of the oral mucosa-specific microRNA-31 promotes skin wound closure. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20, 15 (2019).
Pokrywczynska, M. et al. Mesenchymal stromal cells modulate the molecular pattern of healing process in tissue-engineered urinary bladder: the microarray data. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 10(1), 176 (2019).
Fabregat, A. et al. Reactome pathway analysis: A high-performance in-memory approach. BMC Bioinform. 18(1), 142 (2017).
Chen, L. et al. Periplocin promotes wound healing through the activation of Src/ERK and PI3K/Akt pathways mediated by Na/K-ATPase. Phytomedicine 57, 72–83 (2019).
Hou, B. et al. Vaccarin hastens wound healing by promoting angiogenesis via activation of MAPK/ERK and PI3K/AKT signaling pathways in vivo. Acta Cir Bras 34(12), e201901202 (2020).
Jiang, Z. et al. MicroRNA-26a inhibits wound healing through decreased keratinocytes migration by regulating ITGA5 through PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. Biosci. Rep. 40, 9 (2020).
Rieger, S. et al. The role of nuclear hormone receptors in cutaneous wound repair. Cell Biochem. Funct. 33(1), 1–13 (2015).
Zhou, T. et al. Runt-related transcription factor 1 (RUNX1) promotes TGF-beta-induced renal tubular epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and renal fibrosis through the PI3K subunit p110delta. EBioMedicine 31, 217–225 (2018).
Aunin, E. et al. Exploring a role for regulatory miRNAs in wound healing during ageing: Involvement of miR-200c in wound repair. Sci. Rep. 7(1), 3257 (2017).
Bostjancic, E. & Glavac, D. Importance of microRNAs in skin morphogenesis and diseases. Acta Dermatovenerol. Alp Pannonica Adriat 17(3), 95–102 (2008).
Zhou, Z. et al. microRNA-203 modulates wound healing and scar formation via suppressing hes1 expression in epidermal stem cells. Cell Physiol. Biochem. 49(6), 2333–2347 (2018).
Sonkoly, E. et al. Protein kinase C-dependent upregulation of miR-203 induces the differentiation of human keratinocytes. J. Invest. Dermatol. 130(1), 124–134 (2010).
Sonkoly, E. et al. MicroRNAs: novel regulators involved in the pathogenesis of psoriasis?. PLoS ONE 2(7), e610 (2007).
Liu, J. et al. Quantification of the differential expression levels of microRNA-203 in different degrees of diabetic foot. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 8(10), 13416–13420 (2015).
Soliman, A. M. et al. Role of microRNA in proliferation phase of wound healing. Front. Genet. 9, 38 (2018).
Yu, J. et al. MicroRNA-205 promotes keratinocyte migration via the lipid phosphatase SHIP2. FASEB J. 24(10), 3950–3959 (2010).
Yu, J. et al. MicroRNA-184 antagonizes microRNA-205 to maintain SHIP2 levels in epithelia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105(49), 19300–19305 (2008).
An, J. et al. MicroRNA expression profile and the role of miR-204 in corneal wound healing. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 56(6), 3673–3683 (2015).
Chakraborty, C. et al. Therapeutic advances of miRNAs: A preclinical and clinical update. J. Adv. Res. 28, 127–138 (2021).
du Percie Sert, N. et al. The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biol. 18(7), e3000410 (2020).
Wickham, H. and SpringerLink (Online service), Ggplot2 : elegrant graphics for data analysis. Second edition. ed. Use R!,. 1 online resource (xvi, 260 pages).
Chen, Y. & Wang, X. miRDB: An online database for prediction of functional microRNA targets. Nucleic Acids Res. 48(D1), D127–D131 (2020).
Chamorro, C. I. et al. Study on genetic stability in human urothelial cells in vitro. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 12(2), e720–e726 (2018).
Acknowledgements
We thank for financial support from the Swedish Society of Child Care (SBV); Karolinska Institutet Funds; HRH Crown Princess Lovisa’s Foundation for Children’s Health; Axel Tielman’s Memorial Fund, Novo Nordisk Foundation NNFSA170030576; Promobilia Foundation; and Birgitta and Carl-Axel Rydbeck’s Research Grant for Pediatric Research.
Funding
Open access funding provided by Karolinska Institute.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
C.C. and M.F. conceived and designed the study, J.E. performed bioinformatic analysis, C.C., O.W. and N.J. performed in vitro wound healing assays and RT-PCR validations. C.C. wrote the first draft of the manuscript, C.C. and M.F. wrote and revised the manuscript. All the authors edited, read, and approved the manuscript. M.F. and C.C. secured funding and administrative support of the project.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Chamorro, C.I., Eisfeldt, J., Willacy, O. et al. A database on differentially expressed microRNAs during rodent bladder healing. Sci Rep 11, 21881 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01413-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01413-0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.