Tumors often contain a small subset of drug-resisting, self-renewing, and highly metastatic cells called tumor initiating cells or cancer stem cells (CSCs). To develop new approaches to detecting and targeting lung cancer CSCs, we applied an “unbiased” peptoid combinatorial cell screen to identify highly specific ligands that bind a CSC subpopulation of non-small cell lung cancer cells (defined by Aldefluor positivity), but not the remaining aldefluor negative cancer cells from the same preclinical model. One of the ‘hit’ peptoids bound to plectin, a structural protein, predominantly expressed intracellularly, but whose localization on the cell surface is linked to tumor invasion and metastasis. Our studies show both genotypic and phenotypic correlations between plectin and lung CSCs, as well as association of high plectin mRNA expression with poor patient survival in lung adenocarcinoma, potentially identifying plectin as a biomarker for lung CSCs.
Despite significant advances in targeting cancer by understanding its “hallmark” molecular mechanisms1, most cancer treatments are unable to eliminate small sub-populations of therapy resistant cancer cells, which often have properties of cancer stem cells (CSCs) or tumor initiating cells2. These cells can self-renew, divide asymmetrically, and form tumors in isolation2. CSCs have been linked to drug resistance, metastasis and tumor relapse1,3 and it would be important to discover treatments targeting these sub-populations to provide improved outcomes (Fig. 1A). Developing treatment strategies targeting CSCs remains a challenge, due to the paucity of reliable biomarkers identifying such subpopulations. To circumvent this limitation, we applied our on-bead two-color (OBTC) combinatorial cell screen4,5,6 technology to unbiasedly select peptidomimetic (peptoids: oligo-N-substituted glycines) ligands that specifically target biomarkers on the CSC surface of a preclinical model of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), while not binding to the remaining cancer cells in the same model. Using this approach we identified plectin as a new lung CSC biomarker and potential therapeutic target.
Currently, the most common CSC targeted drug discovery efforts are based on probing developmental pathways that maintain stem cell-like states, such as the Notch, Hedgehog, and Wnt7, or to target known biomarkers that are enriched in CSCs such as CD44, ALDH isozymes, and VEGFR8. Here, we utilized an ‘unbiased’ selection strategy involving a large peptoid library to identify new lung CSC cell surface biomarkers. Previously reported unbiased cell surface ligand selection methods have used phage display9 or synthetic combinatorial screens that subtract background after10 or during the initial screens4,11. In addition, a preclinical model of breast cancer mesenchymal transformation enriching for CSCs was screened for selective CSC toxicity using a library of ~16,000 chemicals and identified salinomycin as having CSC selective toxicity12. We previously reported an OBTC peptoid library screen selection strategy, with cells engineered to express or not express specific biomarkers, allowing us to identify peptoids specifically targeting known cell surface markers such as VEGFR24 and T-cell receptors5. We then applied the OBTC technique to distinguish lung cancer cells from normal lung epithelial cells derived from the same patient6, and identified lipid-phosphatidylserine as the target of the peptoid-ligand selected from this screen13. Here we improved our OBTC technique to unbiasedly screen a large peptoid library for compounds that would bind to a subpopulation of a NSCLC cell line with CSC properties but not to the remainder of the tumor cells from the same cell line, and using these ‘hit’ compounds we identified plectin as a new lung CSC biomarker.
Plectin plays an important role as a bridge between the actin filament and intermediate filament networks14 binding to both vimentin14 and integrin beta-415. Plectin also plays critical roles in cell-cell signaling and mobility16,17. Even though in almost every mammalian cell plectin is housed in the cytosol18, a previous study reported plectin as a “mislocalized” cell surface biomarker for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, where it is transported to the cell surface through exosome transport19. Plectin “mislocalization” to the cell surface then appears to drive migration and invasion19. While these functions are also highly relevant to CSCs, to the best of our knowledge, plectin has not been previously involved as a CSC biomarker. In this study, we show that plectin is highly expressed on the surface of subpopulations of tumor cells within a panel of NSCLC cell lines. These plectin (+) subpopulations are highly clonogenic and enriched for cell migration and other properties of CSCs, and variably correlate with expression of previously described CSC markers such as ALDH1A3, CD44 and SOX2.
OBTC peptoid library screen identifies highly specific peptoids targeting CSCs present in lung adenocarcinoma line NCI-H358
For our preclinical model, we used NCI-H358 (H358) (p53 null, KRAS mutant, STK11 wild-type), a lung adenocarcinoma cell line consisting of 5–18% of aldehyde dehydrogenase positive (ALDH+) cells, a frequently used biomarker for CSCs in cancer cell lines. The subpopulation of H358 ALDH+ cells express the ALDH1A3 isozyme20, and are highly tumorigenic compared to the remaining ALDH− cells and thus exhibit CSC/tumor initiating cell like properties21. H358 depends on ALDH1A3 activity, and when ALDH1A3 is selectively silenced genetically or pharmacologically (inhibiting pSTAT3 or EZH2), the CSC component is lost20. Thus, we used a well characterized NSCLC preclinical model to study CSCs. We first isolated ALDH+ cells from H358 using the commercially available ALDEFluor assay kit, which is based on the activity of ALDH20,21. It is important to note that ALDH is an intracellular protein and our OBTC method is designed to target cell surface molecules, which helps remove bias from our selection method. The ALDH+ subpopulation cells were labeled with red Qdots, and the ALDH− subpopulation cells were labeled with green Qdots, mixed 1:1 and equilibrated with 400,000 one-bead one-compound peptoid library (each bead contains a unique peptoid with multiple copies) described previously6 (Supplementary Fig. S1). If a bead binds red cells (ALDH+) exclusively this indicates that the peptoid on that bead binds to a biomolecule predominantly found on ALDH+ cell surface, and not found (or less) on the remaining cancer cells (Fig. 1B). If the targeted marker is expressed on both ALDH+ and ALDH− cells, then both red and green labeled cells will bind, and finally, if the bead is covered with a peptoid selective for ALDH− cells, then only green cells would bind (Fig. 1B). Here we identified 2 beads selective for binding red cells (out of 400,000 beads), and the peptoid sequences were identified using Edman sequencing (Supplementary Fig. S1 and Table S1). The specific peptoids were resynthesized for further testing and validation and were named PCS1 and PCS2 (Fig. 1C–F). To validate the binding specificity towards the subpopulation of ALDH+ cells, we coated streptavidin-magnetic beads with each of the biotinylated peptoid, mixed with unsorted ALDH+ and ALDH− H358 cells, and isolated bound cells. Using RT-qPCR, we found that the expression of ALDH1A3 gene was higher in both of the peptoid-bound subpopulations compared to unbound, untreated, and controls (Fig. 1G).
Identified peptoids recognize distinct subsets of lung cancer cells over normal cells
We evaluated the binding potential of peptoids PCS1 and PCS2 on 12 molecularly characterized NSCLC lines and one immortalized normal lung bronchial epithelial cell line (HBEC3KT). We used each of the biotinylated PCS1 and PCS2 (see Supplementary Figs. S3-S4) peptoid-coated magnetic beads to pull-down cells and bound and unbound cells were counted and quantified. None of the peptoids bound to HBEC3KT despite the fact that this cell line exhibits 20–30% ALDH+ cells. Peptoids PCS1 and PCS2 bound to distinct subsets of cells within the NSCLC lines (Table 1) and PCS2 displayed a stronger binding to subsets from the majority of NSCLC lines than PCS1. Of interest, despite using ALDH+ H358 cells as the criteria for peptoid library screen, binding had no correlation to previously established ALDH activity in the cell line panel21. For instance, PCS2 bound to higher percentage of H460 cells, which has only 1% ALDH+ cells, and yet does not bind to H1693, which has 38% ALDH+ cells. This further confirms that our OBTC selection has no bias towards ALDH expression and activity.
PCS2 recognizes a subpopulation of H358 cells with CSC-like characteristics
To confirm that PCS2 is binding preferentially to ALDH+ cells, we exposed PCS2-coated tentagel beads to red stained ALDH+ H358 and green stained ALDH− H358 cells, 3 days and 14 days after sorting. PCS2-beads bound significantly to the red cells on the 3rd day and not to green stained cancer cells, as expected (Fig. 1H, first panel). It is known that ALDH+ tumor cells will lose ALDH+ (CSC) characteristics over time, as they differentiate into non-stem cancer cells21. At two weeks, at which point the number of CSCs in the ALDH+ sorted population should have decreased through differentiation, red cell binding was decreased (Fig. 1H, second panel).
We focused on peptoid PCS2, due to its higher binding potential across the majority of NSCLC lines tested. Magnetic-bead binding assays showed PCS2 bound to 80% of ALDH+ H358 cells compared to 20% of human adipose derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) (Fig. 2A), suggesting the cell surface target of PCS2 has some cancer specificity. We compared RT-qPCR expression in PCS2 bound and unbound NSCLC cells of CSC related biomarkers ALDH1A320 CD13321,22, CD4423 and SOX2 [SRY (sex determining region Y)-box 2]7 using H358, H1693, H460, and H1975 NSCLC lines (Fig. 2B–E). ALDH1A3 and SOX2 expression was higher in PCS2-bead-bound cells for H358, H1693, and H460, while CD44 expression was substantially higher in PCS2-bead-bound H460 and H1975 cells. CD133 expression was higher only in PCS2-bead-bound H1693 cells and undetectable in all three remaining cell lines. It is known that the expression of two lung CSC biomarkers ALDH and CD133 do not correlate21,24,25, and we did not detect CD133 expression in either the PCS2 bound or the unbound fractions of H358, H460, and H1975 NSCLCs (Fig. 2B–E). We next evaluated the colony formation potential, an in vitro characteristic trait of CSCs that is a well-established model for tumorigenic potential. Briefly, once cells are seeded at very low concentration, they spread over the plate and lose cell-cell communications that is essential for cell survival. But, CSCs can survive alone and they start forming colonies in isolation. We found that PCS2-bound H358 cells established more colonies than unbound and unsorted H358 cells (Fig. 2F,G), indicating PCS2 isolated CSCs. All these studies are consistent with the proposal that PCS2 binding identified a subpopulation of H358 cells with CSC-like characteristics.
Plectin is the putative target of PCS2
To identify the cellular target of PCS2, we performed a pull-down assay using streptavidin-magnetic beads coated with biotinylated-PCS2-benzophenone (see Supplementary Fig. S5). When PCS2 binds to its corresponding targeted protein, the photo-affinity probe benzophenone can be activated with wavelength-specific light (UV), which generates a highly reactive radical that covalently cross-links with the target protein (Fig. 3A)26. Previously published VEGFR2 targeted biotinylated-GU40C-benzophenone peptoid was used as the non-binding control ligand4. We allowed biotinylated-PCS2-benzophenone and biotinylated-GU40C-benzophenone bind to H358 cells, separated the bound cells using magnetic beads, cross-linked using UV, lysed cells, separated proteins by electrophoresis and visualized these proteins by silver staining. The unique band at around 500 kDA in the PCS2-bound sample, and not present in the control-bound sample nor enriched in the leftover cell lysate (not bound to PCS2) (Fig. 3B), was analyzed by standard proteomics technique. Out of the candidates identified in this region, only plectin was reproducibly detected in multiple experiments (Supplementary Proteomics Dataset S1, 2, 3 and 5). Since this was the only reproducible target, we chose to focus on plectin as the potential hit.
To verify plectin as the target, we isolated the PCS2 bound protein by target-pull-down (described in Fig. 3A), ran the isolate on a gel again, but this time performed a Western Blot using the antibodies for three proteins; plectin and 2 of the non-reproducible, but possible pull-down targets, Myosin 9 (MYH9), and Neuroblast differentiation-associated protein (AHNAK). On H358, plectin was found in the PCS2-bound sample and whole cell lysate, but not in the control-GU40C-benzophenone bound sample (Fig. 3C), identifying plectin as the most likely target. We note, both AHNAK and myosin have known protein-protein interactions with plectin so it is possible their detection in these pull down assays resulted from their interactions with plectin itself27. In addition, when this magnetic-bead coated PCS2 binding assay was performed in the presence of the commercially available plectin specific antibody, the PCS2 bead binding and plectin detected by Western blot was dramatically reduced (Fig. 3C). As further confirmation, no plectin bands were detected when NSCLC line H1155, or normal HBEC3KT, neither of which bind PCS2 (Table 1), were used (Fig. 3C). Exposure of magnetic beads to H358 whole cell lysate also did not produce a plectin band, indicating plectin signal was not due to nonspecific adherences of plectin to these beads. No MYH9 and AHNK bands were detected on PCS2-bound samples from any of the 3 cell lines. We then tested plectin expression on PCS2-bound cells from H358, H1693, H460, and, H1975 cells by RT-qPCR. PLEC expression was significantly higher in PCS2-bound cells than unbound cells in all four lines (Fig. 3D). This result suggests that the plectin protein not only mislocalize to the cell surface of these PCS2-bound cells but is also expressed at a higher level in these cells. We also found that an anti-plectin antibody blocked the binding of NSCLCs (H358, H1693, and H460) to the PCS2 coated beads (Fig. 3E). From all these observations, we conclude that plectin is the cell-surface marker that PCS2 is targeting.
Plectin is found on H358 cell surface, both PCS2 and anti-plectin antibody bind and pulled down cells with CSC signatures
First, to determine if the results we are seeing for PCS2 are due to plectin-specific pulldown or other off-target or non-specific effects, we evaluated if a group of cells sorted for cell surface plectin expression through a PCS2-independent approach had similar characteristics. We used the same membrane impermeable magnetic-bead pull-down assay on four PCS2 binding (H358, H1693, H460, and H1975) and two PCS2-non binding lines (H1155, and HBEC3KT) and coated the beads with: (I) biotinylated-PCS2, and (II) an available biotinylated anti-plectin antibody to separately pull-down cells. For each of the four PCS2 binding lines tested, the percentage of cells bound to plectin-antibody coated beads was similar to that of the PCS2-coated beads and the PCS2 binding negative H1155 and HBEC3KT cells also did not bind to anti-plectin antibody coated beads (Fig. 4A). By contrast, the anti-GST antibody and non-binding control compound coated magnetic beads did not pull down any of the cells.
If PCS2 is interacting with plectin, then we would anticipate plectin to be on the cell surface. To show that plectin is indeed expressed on the tumor cell surface, we used Pierce Cell Surface Protein Isolation Kit (Thermo Fisher). This is a commercially available kit specific for detecting cell surface proteins, which identifies and isolates proteins expressed only on the outer cell surface through biotinylation, and not inner cell membrane bound proteins or cytosolic proteins. This kit was a critical necessity for answering this question, since standard cell membrane fractionation methods detect any membrane bound proteins and plectin is typically found on the inner cell membrane under normal conditions. We then performed western blotting using those cell surface and cytosolic protein fractions on H358 and two PCS2-non binding lines, HBEC3KT and H1155. Plectin was significantly detected in the H358 cell surface fraction, but not in H1155 and only trace amounts in the HBEC3KT surface fractions (Fig. 4B). As expected, all 3 cell lines had plectin expression in cytosolic fractions (Fig. 4B). The cytosolic marker, β-actin was readily detected in the cytosol, but not found on cell surface fractions, indicating the purity of these fractions (Fig. 4B).
To further validate that cell surface plectin identifies a potential CSC marker, we analyzed the mRNA levels of the CSC biomarkers previously used (ALDH1A3, CD44, SOX2) on plectin-antibody-bound H358 cell fraction by RT-qPCR, along with plectin (PLEC). The expression levels of ALDH1A3, PLEC, and SOX2 of the CSC markers were higher in plectin-antibody-bound cells, than in unbound cells (Fig. 4C), indicating the cell subpopulation pulled down from H358 carries those CSC signatures. Also, it is important to note that these data are highly comparable to the data of PCS2-bound fraction of H358 described in Fig. 2B, indicating both PCS2 and plectin-antibody have pulled down the same cell fraction. All these studies indicate that plectin is the protein being detected by the PCS2 peptoid, and the expression of plectin is highly enriched on the H358 cell surface.
Plectin knockdown decreases CSC characteristics both at genotypic and phenotypic levels
Since previous reports have shown cells with plectin knockdown are sufficiently stable for further assays19, we first evaluated if plectin knockdown would have an effect on the gene expression of CSC markers. We performed plectin siRNA knockdown experiment and analyzed the mRNA levels of the CSC markers previously used (ALDH1A3, CD44, SOX2) and PLEC in H358 (Fig. 5A), H1693 (Fig. 5B), H460 (Fig. 5C), and H1975 (Fig. 5D). Upon plectin knockdown, expression of PLEC and SOX2 genes were decreased in all 4 cell lines, while CD44 decreased in H1693, H460, and H1975, and ALDH1A3 expression decreased in H358 and H1963.
To identify if plectin knockdown had an effect on the stem cell-related colony formation phenotype,we performed the clonogenicity assay on 4 PCS2-binding cell lines, H358, H1693, H460, and H1975. In all cases, plectin knock down led to reduction of colony formation compared to control siRNA or untreated cells (Fig. 5E,F).
Since plectin expression has previously been shown to be associated with migration and invasion in other cancer types28,29,30,31, and those phenotypes are associated with CSCs, we performed a “scratch” wound healing/mobility assay under siRNA knockdown conditions in the same 4 cell lines that exhibited strong PCS2 binding potential (H358, H1693, H460, and H1975). In each cell line both untreated and control siRNA treated conditions had a decreased scratch width, after 36 hours siRNA exposure pre-scratch and 24 hours post-scratch, compared to the plectin siRNA knockdown condition, indicating that plectin knockdown reduced the mobility and migration potential of these cells (Fig. 5G,H). This decrease in wound repair was further highlighted when pre-scratch siRNA exposure was increased to 48 hours (Supplementary Fig. S6). However, with long incubation period the pectin knockdown was beginning to have an effect on the health and stability of the monolayer, suggesting plectin is important for either sustained culture health or adherence potential in these lines. The loss of monolayer stability was best represented when the cell cultures were exposed to siRNA for 96 hours without any scratch being made (Supplementary Fig. S6). Overall, these findings indicate plectin can play a role in clonogenicity and migration of NSCLC cells, which are both hallmark characteristics of CSCs.
Plectin expression correlates with poor patient survival and plectin isoforms 1a and 1f are highly expressed in NSCLC lung cancer
We examined the association of patient survival with plectin RNA expression using kmplot (www.kmplot.com/lung)32. This database consists of 10 independent data sets of 1926 lung adenocarcinoma and squamous carcinoma patients. Higher expression of plectin is strongly associated with poor survival in patients with adenocarcinoma (HR = 2.2, P = 5.5e−11, Fig. 6A) and in never smoking lung cancer patients (HR = 3.2, P = 2.8e−5, Fig. 6B). As an opposing observation, the high plectin expression level is associated with better survival in squamous carcinoma patients (Fig. 6C) although the difference is very small (HR = 0.75, P = 0.044). More detailed studies in lung cancer patients with different histology, gender and smoking status showed that the high plectin expression is associated with poor survival with the only exception of patient with squamous carcinoma (Supplementary Fig. S7). In summary, most of the detailed studies showed high plectin expression is associated with poor patient survival. Results of this analysis which is based on clinical studies further strengthen the notion that plectin plays important roles in tumorigenesis.
There are at least 9 different isoforms of plectin in human. Plectin proteins encoded by isoforms 1a and 1f have been shown to be located on cancer cell surface19. We examined the expression of different plectin isoforms in NSCLC lines. Plectin isoform 1a is the highest expressed isoform in NSCLC cell lines, followed by isoform 1f (Fig. 6D). Interestingly, neither isoform is expressed in SCLC cell lines, suggesting that plectin may be a CSC biomarker specific for NSCLC. At least 14 NSCLC cell lines (8%) and 4 SCLC/NE cell lines (6%) have plectin mutation, similarly to TCGA NSCLC (9%). The effect of these mutations is unknown at this point.
In the current study, we have used our OBTC approach to screen a large peptoid library and identified the PCS2 peptoid that specifically bound the ALDH+ subset of H358 NSCLC cells, which previously has been shown to be enriched in CSCs21. We were able to demonstrate that PCS2 binds to plectin, which normally is expressed intracellularly, but in cancer cells can be expressed on the cell surface. Subpopulations of several NSCLC lines that express plectin and that can be isolated with our PCS2 ligand or an anti-plectin antibody, express elevated levels of stem cell markers such as ALDH1A3, SOX2 and CD44. It is important to point out that these biomarkers are not always correlating due to the fact that tumor biomarker expressions are highly heterogeneous, which leads to the existence of various subpopulations within each cancer type21,33. The best example in this context is the poor correlation between two lung cancer specific CSC biomarkers: ALDH and CD13320,21. Cell surface plectin expressing NSCLC subpopulations isolated by PCS2 binding have increased clonogenicity and migration/invasion characteristics compared to plectin− (plectin absent on the cell surface) NSCLC subpopulations from the same tumor line. Furthermore, knockdown of plectin in NSCLCs results in cells with lower expression of CSC markers, and reduced clonogenicity and migration/invasion. Together these observations indicate that not only does the expression of cell surface plectin identifies subpopulations of NSCLC cells with many properties of CSCs, but is also functionally important for these properties and potentially represents a new therapeutic target.
Plectin is a large protein which is ubiquitously expressed in most mammalian cells. It has a number of isoforms with distinct N-terminal domains34,35 that have a similar overall size of ~500 kDa and a structure of two globular domains with a large coiled coil of alpha helices (Rod domain) in between35,36,37. The primary role of plectin is to function as a structural linker between cellular membranes and cytoskeletal components, including the actin microfilaments, microtubules and intermediate filaments14,38,39. Through these interactions, plectin plays an important role in cell-cell interactions, cell-extracellular matrix interactions, cell migration, cellular and tissue integrity and plasticity. Loss or mutations in plectin are associated with tissue degeneration and a loss of cellular structural stability, and in mice, plectin knockout is lethal 3 days after birth40. Importantly, multiple studies have shown plectin expression to be associated with cancer progression and metastasis19,29,30,31,41. In this regard, higher tumor plectin mRNA expression is strongly associated with poor overall survival in lung adenocarcinoma and in non-smoking patient but not in lung squamous cancer (Fig. 6A–C). To date plectin has not been shown to be co-expressed with known CSC biomarker genes (ALDH1A1, CD44 and SOX2), or its expression correlates with CSC phenotypes (clonogenecity and wound healing), and in this study we show that plectin indeed has both genotypic and phenotypic correlations with CSCs.
Recently it was shown that plectin, as part of a plectin-EPLIN (epithelial protein lost in neoplasm)-microtubule complex (in KRASV12 transformed cells), plays an important role in the apical extrusion of KRAS V12 transformed cells from normal epithelial cells and thus activation of the plectin complex could enhance eradication of newly emerging transformed cells from the epithelium42, indicating plectin could be a target for both early cancer prevention as well as CSCs in established cancers. There are at least 12 known plectin isoforms in humans, and isoforms 1a and 1f have been found on cancer cell surfaces in pancreatic cancer19. Interestingly, our genome-wide RNaseq data also found that plectin isoforms 1a and 1f are highly expressed in NSCLC cell lines, but not in SCLC lines (Fig. 6D).
While the expected localization of plectin is cytoplasmic, cell surface expression in pancreatic cancer had been reported (via exosomes secreted from cancer cells), playing a role in growth of pancreatic cancer xenografts in immunodeficient mice19. We hypothesize that such a ‘mislocalization’ of plectin onto cell surface had occurred in NSCLC as well, and that was captured by our PCS2 peptoid in the OBTC screen. Observations in other cancers are consistent with plectin playing a role in CSCs such as promoting migration and invasion in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma31. Also, plectin expression correlates with the interacting intermediate filament vimentin to metastatic potential in androgen-independent prostate adenocarcinoma41. It is known that CSCs and normal stem cells are both enriched with ALDH+ cells43. We have previously shown that HBEC3KT, which is enriched with ALDH cells, has the characteristics of normal lung stem cells44. In the current study we found that PCS2 bound to ALDH+ cells in H358, which has the membrane localized plectin but not to HBEC3KT cells, which lacks the membrane localized plectin. Thus the result is consistent with the notion that the ‘mislocalization’ of plectin onto cell surface is one of the characteristics of CSCs.
In addition to the studies of plectin functions in lung CSCs, we analyzed the expression of plectin in clinical studies and found the high expression of plectin is associated with poor survival of lung adenocarcinoma patients. The association is highly significant with the hazard ratio of 2.2 and p value of 5.5e−11. The result of this analysis further strengthen the notion that plectin plays important roles in tumorigenesis. It is interesting that the decrease of plectin associated lung cancer survival is more significant in non-smokers (HR = 3.2, p = 2.8e−5, Fig. 6 and Supplementary Fig. S7) than that in smokers (HR = 1.9, p = 4.8e−4, Supplementary Fig. S7). The risk factors that cause lung cancer in non-smokers are complex and being actively investigated. Studying the function of plectin may give important insight in the study of non-smoking related lung cancer.
We applied our OBTC assay in an unbiased fashion, designed to identify ligands that bind to biomolecules found on the surface of H358 NSCLC cell subpopulations greatly enriched for ALDH+ cells, and importantly counter selected by not being expressed in the ALDH− population in the same tumor line. Even though we isolated plectin binding PCS2 peptoid targeting ALDH+ tumor cells, we subsequently found that the binding of PCS2 was independent of ALDH expression. Thus, our study illustrates the power of the OBTC peptoid library screening technology to “unbiasedly” identify biomarkers in defined subpopulations of cancer cells, particularly when the remainder of the tumor cells from the same tumor can be used as real-time controls in the single step screening procedure. The other unbiased approaches such as phage display needs multiple rounds to complete the screen on control cells and is limited to peptides.
To the best of our knowledge, only one plectin specific binding small molecule45 and a plectin binding peptide discovered by phage display have been reported so far46. It is also interesting to note that the plectin binding peptide had no structural similarities to our PCS2 peptoid46. Importantly, peptoids, in general, are very easy to synthesize47, protease resistant48, non-immunogenic49, cell permeable50,51 and are rich sources of protein-binding ligands52. Furthermore, PCS2 can readily be used as a potential tool to isolate CSCs and/or other plectin positive cancer cell sub-populations that are metastasizing (e.g. Table 1). Subpopulations isolated from variety of cancer types can comparatively be studied and characterized for CSC signatures using this technology.
In summary, we used a peptoid OBTC combinatorial cell screen to unbiasedly target a ALDH+ subpopulation in a NSCLC which led to the identification of peptoid PCS2, which in turn led to identification of its binding target, plectin which was expressed on the surface of NSCLC tumor cells but not normal lung epithelial cells. Tumor cells isolated with PCS2 or anti-plectin antibodies displayed increased expression of CSC related genes, and plectin knockdown led to dramatically impaired tumor colony formation and migration/invasion. All of these features nominate the plectin as a biomarker of an important subpopulation of NSCLC cells and as a potential therapeutic target.
All the amino acids were purchased from EMD Millipore, MA. All the primary amines (for peptoid synthesis), biotin-maleimide, 4-amonibenzophenone from Sigma-Aldrich, MO. O-Benzotriazole-N,N,N′,N′-tetramethyl-uronium-hexafluoro-phosphate (HBTU) and N–Hydroxybenzotriazole.H2O (HOBt) were purchased from AnaSpec, CA. Applied Biosystems Voyager DePro MALDI mass spectrometer was used in positive reflector mode to acquire MALDI-TOF mass spectra. Alpha-Cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid (Sigma Aldrich, MO) was used as the matrix. HPLC purification was performed in a Waters 1525 Binary HPLC pump connected to Waters 2487 Dual λ absorbance detector using Protein & Peptide C18 300 A°, 22 × 250 mm, 10 micron column from Grace Davison Discovery Sciences. Compound separation was carried out at room temperature using Acetonitrile (ACN; Honeywell, NJ) and water containing 0.1% Trifluoroacetic acid (TFA; Sigma Aldrich, MO).
The synthesis of the peptoid library used to identify PCS1 and PCS2 was previously published6 and described briefly on Supplementary Fig. S1.
Synthesis of biotin-PCS1
Novasyn TGR (EMD Millipore - 200 mg) resin was swelled in DMF for 1 h. First, Fmoc-Cys-OH was coupled using standard coupling agents (HBTU/HOBt/DIPEA) for overnight. After removing Fmoc (20% piperidine), next three amino acids Fmoc-Met-OH, Fmoc-D-Lys(Boc)-OH and Fmoc-Val-OH were introduced using the same protocol with 2 hours reaction. Next, five peptoid residues were coupled using the standard two-step peptoid coupling procedure (acylation and amination) under a microwave (1000 W)-assisted synthesis protocol53. Beads were treated with 2 M bromoacetic acid (1 mL) and 3.2 M DIC (1 mL), and microwaved at 10% power (2 × 15 s) with gentle shaking in between for 30 s for the acylation step. After washing with DMF, beads were treated with 2M N-Boc-1,4-diaminobutane (1 mL), and microwave coupling was performed as described above. The procedure was repeated again to attach the remaining four residues, methoxyethylamine, N-Boc-1,4-diaminobutane (twice), p-methoxybenzylamine. Finally, beads were treated with a cleavage cocktail of TFA/H2O/tri-isopropylsilane (95%/2.5%/2.5%) for 2 h. The final compound was purified using HPLC and analyzed by MALDI-TOF (Voyager DE Pro, AB Systems, USA). The purified compound was lyophilized to obtain the dry product. Biotin-maleimide was then coupled to this compound (1 M: 1 M ratio) in buffer solution at pH 7 for overnight. The coupled Biotin-PCS1 compound was then purified using HPLC.
Synthesis of biotin-PCS2
Biotin-PCS2 was synthesized following same procedure as described above, using Fmoc-Cys-OH, Fmoc-Met-OH, Fmoc-D-Lys(Boc)-OH and Fmoc-Lys(Boc)-OH for peptide region and N-Boc-1,4-diaminobutane, (R)-(+)-α-methylbenzylamine, piperonylamine, N-Boc-1,4-diaminobutane and methoxyethylamine for peptoid region.
Synthesis of biotinylated PCS2-benzophenone
The biotinylated PCS2 was synthesized as described above, except this time using Fmoc-Glu(biotinyl-PEG)-OH (glutamine pre-loaded with biotin, EMD Millipore, MA) directly as the first residue, which enables us to eliminate final maleimide coupling step needed to bring in biotin moiety. Finally, before cleave the compound off the resin, 4-amonibenzophenone was coupled after bromoacylation in the presence of DIPEA and kept on shaker for overnight. Compound cleavage, confirmations and purifications were completed as described in above.
Synthesis of biotinylated GU40C-benzophenone
Followed the same protocol described above to couple Fmoc-Glu(biotinyl-PEG)-OH as first residue and 4-amonibenzophenone as the last residue and the rest of the GU40C compound was synthesized as previously described4.
On-bead two-color (OBTC) binding assay for combinatorial library screen using ALDH+/− H358 cells
Each time the screens were conducted with about 100,000 peptoid library beads synthesized on TentaGel macro-beads (4 × 100,000 for the completion). To begin, 100,000 beads were swelled in DMF overnight. Next day beads were washed three times in RPMI medium (Sigma-Aldrich, MO) with 5% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and equilibrated in the same medium containing 2% Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA, Sigma-Aldrich, MO) for 1 hour in three polypropylene tubes (~33,000 beads/tube). ALDEFluor separated (see Supplementary information) H358 ALDH+ and ALDH− cell groups were washed and suspended in RPMI medium with 5% FBS. H358 ALDH+ cells were labeled with Qtracker 655 (red color) and H358 ALDH− cells labeled with Qtracker 565 (green color) (see Supplementary Information). Cells were twice washed with RPMI medium with 5% FBS and re-suspended in RPMI media with 5% FBS and 2% BSA (3 mL for each type). Labeled cells were visualized with special long pass DAPI filter of BX-51 fluorescence microscope (Olympus, PA) with a color camera. Both cell groups were mixed thoroughly and pipetted up and down several times to break the clumps. 2 ml of cell suspension mixture was added to each of the three beads containing polypropylene tubes and incubated at room temperature with gentle shaking for 30 minutes (Final cell density for each cell group was 0.5 × 106 and the total cell density was 1 × 106). The beads were gently washed two times with RPMI medium and visualized under the fluorescent microscope using DAPI filter. Single beads containing only red cell bound were isolated manually, stripped off cells and processed for Edman sequencing (Supplementary Table S1, Fig. S1) as previously published4.
Magnetic bead binding assay
Dynabeads™ MyOne™ Streptavidin T1 (Thermo Fisher) were coated with biotinylated PCS1, 2 and control peptoid PC4626. Cells were dissociated using Dissociation Buffer or 1x accutase (Sigma). The beads were equilibrated with 2 million cells and incubated for 10 min at RT with gentle shaking. Bead-bound cells and non-bound cells were separated by magnet and counted by Cellometer Mini (Nexcelom). A fraction of each bead-bound sample was then plated for visualization by microscope and then the remaining cells were harvested for RT-qPCR or used in Clonogenicity assay. For the antibody-based magnetic bead binding assay, biotinylated plectin antibody (Bioss Antibodies, Woburn, MA), was used in place of the biotinylated compounds. For the competitive binding assay (Fig. 3E), 1 µg of c-terminal-targeting plectin antibody (ab83497 or ab32528, Abcam, Cambridge, MA) was added to the incubation between beads and cells.
Colony formation assay
300 cells from each cell group tested were plated in growth media to 35 mm cell culture plates in duplicate and grown for 2 weeks or until colonies were visible by eye. Each plate was stained with Crystal Violet for 5 minutes, before being washed with MilliQ-filtered dH2O. Plates were then photographed and colonies were counted using the MOESM software program54, and confirmed through microscopic counting.
On-bead target pull-down
The assay was performed using Dynabeads coated with PCS2 and control GU40C4 (biotinylated and derivatized with benzophenone). H358 cells (10 million) were incubated with those beads for 10 min at room temperature under agitation. After separating the unbound cells magnetically, the beads were washed, and exposed to UV light for 1 hour to crosslink the benzophenone to bound protein targets on the cell surface. The beads were isolated magnetically, resuspended in NP-40 cell lysis buffer (at 4 °C for 20 minutes) with protease inhibitors, separated magnetically from the lysate, resuspended in 1% SDS and boiled for 10 minutes to denature cross-linked proteins and release from the bead through streptavidin denaturing. The released proteins were run in SDS-PAGE gel electrophoresis alongside the control-compound fraction and the H358 whole cell lysate. Control samples includes non-binding compound (biotin-GU40C4)-coated beads, just beads incubated in H358 lysate, and a biotin-PCS2-benzophenone competed with 1 µg/mL Plectin antibody (ab83497). The protein ladder used was Spectra Multicolor Broad Range Protein Ladder (Thermo Fisher).
After on-bead target pull-down, the gel was run and silver stained, following the established protocol55. All steps were followed according to the protocol, except incubation with the developing solution required less than 2 minutes before the bands became clearly visible. Once bands were visible, the bands were extracted and submitted to the Proteomics and Metabolomics Facility at MD Anderson Cancer Center for standard mass spectrometric protein sequencing analysis.
On-bead target pull-down and western blotting
On-bead target pull-down and gel running was performed as described above and the proteins were transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. The membrane was then blotted and visualized using the ScanLater Western Blot Kit (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA) as follows: the membrane is blocked for 1 hour in the blocking buffer, then, separately, 1 µg/ml anti-plectin (ab83497, Abcam), 1:100 anti-MYH9 (sc-98978, Santa Cruz Biotech, Santa Cruz, CA), or 1:100 anti-AHNAK (sc-98373) was added and incubated for 2 hours to overnight. After 5 minutes, the membrane is washed with the wash buffer and is incubated in 1:5000 Eu-labelled anti-rabbit antibody in 1x blocking buffer for 1 hour. The membrane is then washed, and visualized using the SpectraMax i3 spectrophotometer (Molecular Devices). The protein ladder used was Precision Plus Protein Dual Color ladder (Bio-Rad).
Cell surface fraction western blotting
This was carried out using the Pierce Cell Surface Protein Isolation Kit (Thermo Fisher), following the manufacturer’s protocol and followed up by western blot analysis. The protein ladder used was Spectra Multicolor Broad Range Protein Ladder (Thermo Fisher).
Patient survival analysis
Survival analysis was based on 1926 lung cancer patients and the online survival software kmplot (www.kmplot.com) (Gyorffy B et al., PLoS One 8, e82241, 2013). Plectin probe with Affimetrix ID of 216971_s_st was used in the analysis. The split of high and low expression patients was auto selected in the program using the best cutoff value.
RNAseq expression and mutation
RNAseq expression and mutation data were generated as previously described (McMillan et al., Cell 173, 864–878, 2018).
Where appropriate, p values were calculated by two-tailed t-test using the GraphPad Prism 7 software (GraphPad Software).
Hanahan, D. & Weinberg, R. A. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 144, 646–674, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013 (2011).
Mitra, S. S. et al. Introduction: Cancer Stem Cells. In Cancer Stem Cells: Targeting the Roots of Cancer, Seeds of Metastasis, and Sources of Therapy Resistance (ed. H. Lathia Liu, J. D.) Ch. 1, 3–24 (Academic Press, United Kingdom 2016).
Bandhavkar, S. Cancer stem cells: a metastasizing menace! Cancer Med. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.629 (2016).
Udugamasooriya, D. G., Dineen, S. P., Brekken, R. A. & Kodadek, T. A Peptoid “Antibody Surrogate” That Antagonizes VEGF Receptor 2 Activity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 5744–5752, https://doi.org/10.1021/ja711193x (2008).
Gocke, A. R., Udugamasooriya, D. G., Archer, C. T., Lee, J. & Kodadek, T. Isolation of antagonists of antigen-specific autoimmune T cell proliferation. Chem. Biol. 16, 1133–1139, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chembiol.2009.10.011 (2009).
Matharage, J. M., Minna, J. D., Brekken, R. A. & Udugamasooriya, D. G. Unbiased Selection of Peptide–Peptoid Hybrids Specific for Lung Cancer Compared to Normal Lung Epithelial Cells. ACS Chem. Biol. 10, 2891–2899, https://doi.org/10.1021/acschembio.5b00592 (2015).
Cancer Stem Cells: Targeting the Roots of Cancer, Seeds of Metastasis, and Sources of Therapy Resistance (ed. H. Lathia Liu, J. D.) (Academic Press, London, United Kingdom 2016).
Deonarain, M. P., Kousparou, C. A. & Epenetos, A. A. Antibodies targeting cancer stem cells: a new paradigm in immunotherapy? MAbs 1, 12–25 (2009).
Landon, L. A. & Deutscher, S. L. Combinatorial discovery of tumor targeting peptides using phage display. Journal of cellular biochemistry 90, 509–517, https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.10634 (2003).
Peng, L. et al. Combinatorial chemistry identifies high-affinity peptidomimetics against alpha4beta1 integrin for in vivo tumor imaging. Nature chemical biology 2, 381–389, https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio798 (2006).
Aina, O. H. et al. From combinatorial chemistry to cancer-targeting peptides. Molecular pharmaceutics 4, 631–651, https://doi.org/10.1021/mp700073y (2007).
Gupta, P. B. et al. Identification of selective inhibitors of cancer stem cells by high-throughput screening. Cell 138, 645–659, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.06.034 (2009).
Desai, T. J., Toombs, J. E., Minna, J. D., Brekken, R. A. & Udugamasooriya, D. G. Identification of lipid-phosphatidylserine (PS) as the target of unbiasedly selected cancer specific peptide-peptoid hybrid PPS1. Oncotarget 7, 30678–30690, https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.8929 (2016).
Osmanagic-Myers, S. et al. Plectin reinforces vascular integrity by mediating crosstalk between the vimentin and the actin networks. Journal of cell science 128, 4138–4150, https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.172056 (2015).
Song, J. G. et al. Structural insights into Ca2+ -calmodulin regulation of Plectin 1a-integrin beta4 interaction in hemidesmosomes. Structure 23, 558–570, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2015.01.011 (2015).
Cheng, C. C. et al. Transient knockdown-mediated deficiency in plectin alters hepatocellular motility in association with activated FAK and Rac1-GTPase. Cancer cell international 15, 29, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-015-0177-1 (2015).
Eisenberg, J. L. et al. Plectin-containing, centrally localized focal adhesions exert traction forces in primary lung epithelial cells. Journal of cell science 126, 3746–3755, https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.128975 (2013).
Wiche, G., Krepler, R., Artlieb, U., Pytela, R. & Denk, H. Occurrence and immunolocalization of plectin in tissues. The Journal of cell biology 97, 887–901 (1983).
Shin, S. J. et al. Unexpected gain of function for the scaffolding protein plectin due to mislocalization in pancreatic cancer. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110, 19414–19419, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1309720110 (2013).
Shao, C. et al. Essential role of aldehyde dehydrogenase 1A3 for the maintenance of non-small cell lung cancer stem cells is associated with the STAT3 pathway. Clinical cancer research: an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research 20, 4154–4166, https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-3292 (2014).
Sullivan, J. P. et al. Aldehyde dehydrogenase activity selects for lung adenocarcinoma stem cells dependent on notch signaling. Cancer research 70, 9937–9948, https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-0881 (2010).
Bertolini, G. et al. Highly tumorigenic lung cancer CD133+ cells display stem-like features and are spared by cisplatin treatment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106, 16281–16286, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0905653106 (2009).
Leung, E. L. et al. Non-small cell lung cancer cells expressing CD44 are enriched for stem cell-like properties. PLoS One 5, e14062, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0014062 (2010).
Miyata, T. et al. The Clinical Significance of Cancer Stem Cell Markers ALDH1A1 and CD133 in Lung Adenocarcinoma. Anticancer research 37, 2541–2547, https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.11597 (2017).
Okudela, K. et al. Expression of the potential cancer stem cell markers, CD133, CD44, ALDH1, and beta-catenin, in primary lung adenocarcinoma–their prognostic significance. Pathology international 62, 792–801, https://doi.org/10.1111/pin.12019 (2012).
Sumranjit, J. & Chung, S. J. Recent advances in target characterization and identification by photoaffinity probes. Molecules 18, 10425–10451, https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules180910425 (2013).
Straub, B. K. et al. A novel cell-cell junction system: the cortex adhaerens mosaic of lens fiber cells. Journal of cell science 116, 4985–4995, https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.00815 (2003).
Bausch, D. et al. Plectin-1 as a novel biomarker for pancreatic cancer. Clinical cancer research: an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research 17, 302–309, https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-0999 (2011).
McInroy, L. & Maatta, A. Plectin regulates invasiveness of SW480 colon carcinoma cells and is targeted to podosome-like adhesions in an isoform-specific manner. Exp Cell Res 317, 2468–2478, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2011.07.013 (2011).
Lee, K. Y. et al. An early evaluation of malignant tendency with plectin expression in human colorectal adenoma and adenocarcinoma. Journal of medicine 35, 141–149 (2004).
Katada, K. et al. Plectin promotes migration and invasion of cancer cells and is a novel prognostic marker for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Journal of proteomics 75, 1803–1815, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2011.12.018 (2012).
Gyorffy, B., Surowiak, P., Budczies, J. & Lanczky, A. Online survival analysis software to assess the prognostic value of biomarkers using transcriptomic data in non-small-cell lung cancer. PLoS One 8, e82241, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0082241 (2013).
Hermann, P. C. et al. Distinct populations of cancer stem cells determine tumor growth and metastatic activity in human pancreatic cancer. Cell Stem Cell 1, 313–323, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2007.06.002 (2007).
Fuchs, P. et al. Unusual 5′ transcript complexity of plectin isoforms: novel tissue-specific exons modulate actin binding activity. Human molecular genetics 8, 2461–2472 (1999).
Elliott, C. E. et al. Plectin transcript diversity: identification and tissue distribution of variants with distinct first coding exons and rodless isoforms. Genomics 42, 115–125, https://doi.org/10.1006/geno.1997.4724 (1997).
Manso, J. A. et al. Purification and Structural Analysis of Plectin and BPAG1e. Methods Enzymol 569, 177–196, https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.mie.2015.05.002 (2016).
Winter, L. & Wiche, G. The many faces of plectin and plectinopathies: pathology and mechanisms. Acta neuropathologica 125, 77–93, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-012-1026-0 (2013).
Geerts, D. et al. Binding of integrin alpha6beta4 to plectin prevents plectin association with F-actin but does not interfere with intermediate filament binding. The Journal of cell biology 147, 417–434 (1999).
Bouameur, J. E. et al. Interaction of plectin with keratins 5 and 14: dependence on several plectin domains and keratin quaternary structure. The Journal of investigative dermatology 134, 2776–2783, https://doi.org/10.1038/jid.2014.255 (2014).
Andra, K. et al. Targeted inactivation of plectin reveals essential function in maintaining the integrity of skin, muscle, and heart cytoarchitecture. Genes Dev 11, 3143–3156 (1997).
Burch, T. C., Watson, M. T. & Nyalwidhe, J. O. Variable metastatic potentials correlate with differential plectin and vimentin expression in syngeneic androgen independent prostate cancer cells. PLoS One 8, e65005, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065005 (2013).
Kadeer, A. et al. Plectin is a novel regulator for apical extrusion of RasV12-transformed cells. Sci Rep 7, 44328, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep44328 (2017).
Ginestier, C. et al. ALDH1 is a marker of normal and malignant human mammary stem cells and a predictor of poor clinical outcome. Cell Stem Cell 1, 555–567, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2007.08.014 (2007).
Vaughan, M. B., Ramirez, R. D., Wright, W. E., Minna, J. D. & Shay, J. W. A three-dimensional model of differentiation of immortalized human bronchial epithelial cells. Differentiation 74, 141–148, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-0436.2006.00069.x (2006).
Meier, S. M. et al. An Organoruthenium Anticancer Agent Shows Unexpected Target Selectivity For Plectin. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 56, 8267–8271, https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201702242 (2017).
Kelly, K. A. et al. Targeted nanoparticles for imaging incipient pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. PLoS medicine 5, e85, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0050085 (2008).
Zuckermann, R. N., Kerr, J. M., Kent, S. B. H. & Moos, W. H. Efficient method for the preparation of peptoids [oligo(N-substituted glycines)] by submonomer solid-phase synthesis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114, 10646–10647, https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00052a076 (1992).
Alluri, P. G., Reddy, M. M., Bachhawat-Sikder, K., Olivos, H. J. & Kodadek, T. Isolation of protein ligands from large peptoid libraries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 13995–14004, https://doi.org/10.1021/ja036417x (2003).
Astle, J. M., Udugamasooriya, D. G., Smallshaw, J. E. & Kodadek, T. A VEGFR2 antagonist and other peptoids evade immune recognition. Int J Pept Res Ther. 14, 223–227 (2008).
Kwon, Y. U. & Kodadek, T. Quantitative evaluation of the relative cell permeability of peptoids and peptides. Journal of the American Chemical Society 129, 1508–1509, https://doi.org/10.1021/ja0668623 (2007).
Tan, N. C., Yu, P., Kwon, Y. U. & Kodadek, T. High-throughput evaluation of relative cell permeability between peptoids and peptides. Bioorg Med. Chem. 16, 5853–5861, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2008.04.074 (2008).
Zuckermann, R. N. & Kodadek, T. Peptoids as potential therapeutics. Curr. Opin. Mol. Ther. 11, 299–307 (2009).
Olivos, H. J., Alluri, P. G., Reddy, M. M., Salony, D. & Kodadek, T. Microwave-Assisted Solid-Phase Synthesis of Peptoids. Org. Lett. 4, 4057–4059, https://doi.org/10.1021/ol0267578 (2002).
Niyazi, M., Niyazi, I. & Belka, C. Counting colonies of clonogenic assays by using densitometric software. Radiation oncology 2, 4, https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-717x-2-4 (2007).
Morrissey, J. H. Silver stain for proteins in polyacrylamide gels: a modified procedure with enhanced uniform sensitivity. Anal Biochem 117, 307–310 (1981).
This work is funded by NIH SPORE 5P50 CA70907 and University of Houston GEAR grant. We thank David Hawke at the Proteomics and Metabolomics Facility at the MD Anderson Cancer Center for analyzing protein samples and valuable discussions about target identifications, which was in part supported by Cancer Prevention Research Institute of Texas (CPRIT) grant number RP130397 and NIH grant number 1S10OD012304-01. We thank Gregory Cuny at the University of Houston for reading and providing input to the manuscript. We also thank James Sullivan and Michael Peyton at UT-Southwestern Medical Center for cell handling and technology support. Flow cytometry-based cell sorting was performed at both the UT Southwestern Flow Cytometry Core facility, and the UT MD Anderson Flow Cytometry Core Facility, the latter of which is partially funded by NCI Cancer Center Support Grant P30CA16672. We also acknowledge Margot Johnson Foundation for funding.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Raymond, A.C., Gao, B., Girard, L. et al. Unbiased peptoid combinatorial cell screen identifies plectin protein as a potential biomarker for lung cancer stem cells. Sci Rep 9, 14954 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-51004-3
This article is cited by
Susceptibility of cytoskeletal-associated proteins for tumor progression
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences (2022)
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.