Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Updating salamander datasets with phenotypic and stomach content information for two mainland Speleomantes

Abstract

European plethodontid salamanders (genus Speleomantes; formerly Hydromantes) are a group of eight strictly protected amphibian species which are sensitive to human-induced environmental changes. Long-term monitoring is highly recommended to evaluate their status and to assess potential threats. Here we used two low-impact methodologies to build up a large dataset on two mainland Speleomantes species (S. strinatii and S. ambrosii), which represents an update to two previously published datasets, but also includes several new populations. Specifically, we provide a set of 851 high quality images and a table gathering stomach contents recognized from 560 salamanders. This dataset offers the opportunity to analyse phenotypic traits and stomach contents of eight populations belonging to two Speleomantes species. Furthermore, the data collection performed over different periods allows to expand the potential analyses through a wide temporal scale, allowing long-term studies.

Measurement(s) Gastric Content • Image
Technology Type(s) light microscopy • Digital Photography
Sample Characteristic - Organism Speleomantes • Hydromantes
Sample Characteristic - Environment Subterranean • karst cave • mine
Sample Characteristic - Location Italy • Region of Liguria • Municipality of Genova • Province of La Spezia

Machine-accessible metadata file describing the reported data: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.14346176

Background & Summary

European cave salamanders are a group of eight amphibians endemic to Italy and to a small part of the French Provence1, all belonging to the genus Speleomantes1 (formerly considered Hydromantes). Three species (S. strinatii, S. ambrosii and S. italicus) are distributed along the Northern and Central Apennines (only S. strinatii naturally extends its range also in France), while the other five (S. flavus, S. supramontis, S. imperialis, S. sarrabusensis and S. genei) are endemic to Sardinia1. European cave salamanders are fully terrestrial and lack lungs (Lanza et al., 2006). These features force Speleomantes to select only specific microclimatic conditions: they need high moisture and relatively cold temperatures to survive2. Therefore, Speleomantes often inhabit subterranean environments3,4, where their preferred microclimatic conditions are realized5. Nonetheless, subterranean environments also may be chosen by Speleomantes because predator pressure is lower if compared to epigean ones6,7. Indeed, Speleomantes likely represent one of the apex predators in these environments8, preying on a wide array of taxa9. Speleomantes’ narrow eco-physiological requirements, combined with their limited distributions and high site fidelity1,10, make these species very sensitive to human-induced effects and susceptible to extinction11,12; all Speleomantes species are therefore strictly protected13,14.

Improving our knowledge of species at risk of extinction is fundamental to assess their potential threats and to guarantee their survival15,16. For example, prolonged monitoring may help to understand the impact of specific environmental changes17,18,19, allowing to forecast future scenarios and promptly act to protect endangered species20,21,22. In this regard, the production of comparable datasets through time is of key importance9,23,24. However, data collection may not always be an easy task. Species can occur in habitats that pose challenges to human exploration, as for subterranean environments, where sampling and progression require considerable effort and specific technical skills25,26,27. Subterranean habitats are not only hard to find or explore, but their peculiar environmental conditions (e.g., cold temperatures, high moisture, narrow space) might challenge surveyor’s stamina with a negative impact on the data recorded25,28. Another limit to data collection can be determined by the techniques used to collect information. For example, the old-fashioned research methods involving the sacrifice/harm of individuals are now widely condemned and avoided, especially when concerning protected species29,30. Therefore, there is an increasing trend in the use of new harmless alternative approaches31,32.

We here describe a new database reporting data on two endangered Speleomantes species that can be handled only under specific national authorizations (see Acknowledgments). This dataset includes information on the population structure, phenotypic traits and diet of individuals belonging to two mainland Speleomantes species: S. strinatii and S. ambrosii. The information gathered here was collected adopting methodologies that limit negative impact on individuals, and can be combined with the two previously published datasets on these species9,23, extending the available information in space and time. In this work we gathered data from new populations to cover more area of the species’ range, but we also repeated the surveys in previously visited populations, thus providing temporal series of information allowing long-term studies focusing on populations but also on single individuals as well33,34. Specifically, we here describe a dataset composed of two types of data: images and stomach contents. High quality images allow extrapolation of data on multiple phenotypic traits (e.g., size, morphology, coloration), obtaining information on the overall population traits and on single individuals as well23,33,35. In the era of digitization36,37, this new “living” digital catalogue (i.e., collection composed by photos of living organisms) will partially replace the natural history museum collections, becoming, at least for some animal groups, an alternative that not only spare animals lives, but also overcome classic limits such as space needed to store specimens and readiness to be used by the worldwide scientific community with no costs37. Another advantage of “living” collections is its repeatability, namely the possibility that individuals can be digitally collected multiple times, allowing to perform long term studies on single individuals and populations as well. The data related to stomach contents can be analysed to study the species’ trophic niche and the multiple related traits34,38,39. Nonetheless, comparing datasets produced over different time allows to assess potential variation affecting specific species traits and infer on the possible causes40,41.

Methods

Surveyed sites

We surveyed eight subterranean sites, three artificial mines and five natural caves (Fig. 1); all these sites fall within the species’ natural range1. Surveys were performed in 2020, between 9 am and 6 pm during warm and sunny days, periods in which subterranean abundance of Speleomantes is the highest42. All sites were surveyed in July, while for six of them surveys were also repeated in September (Table 1). We performed extensive research of Speleomantes within the subterranean sites43, covering areas where the exploration was possible without speleological equipment. Salamanders were captured and placed in drilled plastic boxes waiting to be checked. When salamanders sampling was finished, we proceeded with the data collection following this order: (i) assessment of the presence/absence of the mental gland for the identification of adult males (see Fig. 1a in35); (ii) record of body weight using a digital scale (precision 0.01 g); (iii) stomach flushing (see below); (iv) photo shooting (see below). Salamanders were then released in their collection points.

Fig. 1
figure1

Map of the surveyed populations. Yellow labels indicate the surveyed sites for Speleomantes strinatii, while red ones those surveyed for S. ambrosii. Stars indicate the artificial subterranean environments, while circles identify natural ones. Precise coordinates are not shown to increase populations protection58.

Table 1 Updating photos and stomach contents datasets for two mainland Speleomantes salamanders: data from summer 2020.

Stomach flushing

Stomach flushing is a technique enabling to inspect amphibians stomach contents without harming individuals29,44. A detailed description of this methodology is provided in Lunghi, et al.9. Preserved stomach contents were examined in the lab using an optical microscope, and undigested prey items (or part of them; see9) were recognized at the order level; Staphylinidae (Coleoptera) and Formicidae (Hymenoptera) insect families were considered separately. When possible, also arthropods’ different stages where considered as independent prey category. Stomach contents were considered: “empty”, if no prey item was observed; “not-identifiable”, if the advanced stage of digestion prevented the identification to the order level; “full”, if at least one prey item was recognizable. Recognized prey were counted following the method described in Lunghi, et al.9. Prey items were rarely integer and the identification was often based on fragments. This condition hampered any potential standardized measurement of prey volume using representative geometric polygons. Stomach flushing was performed on a subsample of the captured salamanders (Table 1).

Photo shooting

In a dark area of the subterranean environment, captured salamanders were dorsally photographed inside a white soft-box to obtain an homogeneous illumination of the subject and reduce shadows23. Before each photo session, a photo was shot to a Pantone colour card X-Rite Colorcheker Passport 2 placed into the soft-box to correctly calibrate the colours and light of photos during post-production23. We then photographed salamanders next to a plastic ruler to have a standardize size reference. Please refer to23 for additional information on this method.

Data Records

The dataset (Photos and stomach contents of two mainland Italian Speleomantes salamanders: data from summer 202045) can be downloaded from figshare and consists of:

  1. 1.

    854 photos of salamanders from two mainland Speleomantes species: S. strinatii (S_strinatii4, 28 in July; S_strinatii1, 47 in July and 73 in September; S_strinatii2, 15 in July and 10 in September; S_strinatii5, 118 in July and 88 in September, S_strinatii6, 26 in July) and S. ambrosii (S_ambrosii2, 108 in July and 98 in September; S_ambrosii3, 21 in July and 51 in September; S_ambrosii4, 59 in July and 112 in September). The code adopted to label populations (name of the species + number indicating the population) enables to combine the present dataset with two previously published (see Usage Notes).

  2. 2.

    565 salamanders stomach contents, subdivided in 313 individuals with empty stomach, 37 with non-recognizable contents, and 215 individuals with full stomach.

  3. 3.

    978 recognized prey items belonging to 17 different prey categories (Pulmonata, Araneae, Pseudoscorpiones, Opiliones, Julida, Isopoda, Entomobryomorpha, Orthoptera, Blattodea, Hymenoptera, Formicidae, Coleoptera, Diptera, Diptera_larva, Archaeognatha, Speleomantes_skin, Haplotaxida).

  4. 4.

    NA means no specific data existing.

Detailed explanation of dataset Photos and stomach contents of two mainland Italian Speleomantes salamanders: data from summer 202045 is given in Table 1.

Technical Validation

This dataset provides data on two strictly protected amphibian species13. Salamanders were sampled following protocols aiming to avoid the spread of potential pathogens46; specifically, we used disposable gloves and disinfected with bleach equipment and boots before changing location. During each month, all surveys were performed within 4 days to limit the variation of environmental conditions which may alter the local ecological opportunity38,41. To limit pseudoreplication, each site was surveyed only once per month. On the other hand, the two surveys performed on the same populations during different months (July and September) create the condition to test additional hypotheses, like the assessment of temporal variability on salamanders’ trophic niche41, or even to employ specific software to individually recognize salamanders47,48 and focus future research on single individuals as well. A blinded stomach contents analysis was performed to limit possible bias49. The methodology used to shoot photos enables the production of standardised high quality images with low impact on the species23,50. The white calibration before each session avoided potential divergence in light condition and thus, providing standardised pictures. This method allows the creation of a “living” digital collection of Speleomantes23, a method that does not only avoid the sacrifice of animals (and thus the related stochastic effects conditioning the evolution of populations) but it is also repeatable. For future updates we will try to include an estimation of prey volume, preferably using methodologies allowing to directly measure the volume (i.e., immerging residuals in a liquid).

Usage Notes

The first part of this dataset is composed of high quality images of individuals of Speleomantes strinatii and S. ambrosii from dorsal view. We suggest the use of the program ImageJ to extrapolate salamanders morphometrics and to estimate their snout-vent length35, a fundamental parameter to distinguish juveniles from adults1. The images can be also used in R environment (http://www.R-project.org/) to perform analysis on multiple phenotypic traits51,52. Considering that the dorsal pattern of Speleomantes does not change through the time33, it can be used as natural mark to individually recognize salamanders48,53. The repeated surveys performed on the same locations were thought to test the efficacy of specific software to automatically recognize Speleomantes salamanders47,53. It has been observed that the ventral pattern of the mainland S. strinatii can be used to individually recognize salamanders, and that software can be employed to do it automatically54. However, only the three mainland species have visible pigments on their ventral side1, thus alternative methods are needed for analyses embracing all Speleomantes (i.e. including the five Sardinian species). Furthermore, the recognition of Speleomantes using their dorsal pattern limits individuals’ handling, a potential source of both stress and pathogens50,55,56,57. The population S_strinatii2 in the previously published dataset23 included two nearby sites, the S_strinatii2 and S_strinatii5 shown here. To combine these data, the actual S_strinatii2 contains the previous 20 photos (1045074–1045113) and the actual S_strinatii5 the other 20 (1045114–1045142). Furthermore, also the population S_strinatii3 in the previous dataset23 includes 2 different nearby sites; we therefore suggest to split it in S_strinatii3 with the first 33 photos (1045032–1045056) and in S_strinatii7 with the other 10 (1045057–1045069).

The second part of the dataset is provided in CSV format and is ready to be analysed with R. Populations are codified following23. To combine the data on stomach contents with the previous dataset:9 S_ambrosii2 = Cave_ambrosii1, S_ambrosii3 = Cave_ambrosii3, S_ambrosii4 = Cave_ambrosii2. The data on stomach contents allows to assess different characteristics of the populations trophic niche34,38,41. However, only after verifying whether the single individuals were captured during the two different surveys, it is possible to evaluate the variation of individuals’ trophic niche over time.

Code availability

No code was used in this study.

References

  1. 1.

    Lanza, B., Pastorelli, C., Laghi, P. & Cimmaruta, R. A review of systematics, taxonomy, genetics, biogeography and natural history of the genus Speleomantes Dubois, 1984 (Amphibia Caudata Plethodontidae). Atti Mus civ stor nat Trieste 52, 5–135 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Ficetola, G. F. et al. Differences between microhabitat and broad-scale patterns of niche evolution in terrestrial salamanders. Sci Rep 8, 10575, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28796-x (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Lunghi, E., Manenti, R. & Ficetola, G. F. Seasonal variation in microhabitat of salamanders: environmental variation or shift of habitat selection? PeerJ 3, e1122, https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1122 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Ficetola, G. F., Lunghi, E. & Manenti, R. Microhabitat analyses support relationships between niche breadth and range size when spatial autocorrelation is strong. Ecography 43, 1–11, https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.04798 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Culver, D. C. & Pipan, T. The biology of caves and other subterranean habitats 2nd edn (Oxford University Press, 2019).

  6. 6.

    Bradley, J. G. & Eason, P. K. Predation risk and microhabitat selection by cave salamanders, Eurycea lucifuga (Rafinesque, 1822). Behaviour 155, 841–859, https://doi.org/10.1163/1568539X-00003505 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Salvidio, S., Palumbi, G., Romano, A. & Costa, A. Safe caves and dangerous forests? Predation risk may contribute to salamander colonization of subterranean habitats. The Science of Nature 104, 20, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-017-1443-y (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Manenti, R., Melotto, A., Guillaume, O., Ficetola, G. F. & Lunghi, E. Switching from mesopredator to apex predator: how do responses vary in amphibians adapted to cave living? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 74, 126, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-020-02909-x (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Lunghi, E. et al. Field-recorded data on the diet of six species of European Hydromantes cave salamanders. Sci Data 5, 180083, https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2018.83 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Lunghi, E. & Bruni, G. Long-term reliability of Visual Implant Elastomers in the Italian cave salamander (Hydromantes italicus). Salamandra 54, 283–286 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Mace, G. M. & Lande, R. Assessing extinction threats: towards a reevaluation of IUCN threatened species categories. Conservation Biology 5, 148–157 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Huey, R. B. et al. Predicting organismal vulnerability to climate warming: roles of behaviour, physiology and adaptation. Philosophical Transaction of the Royal Society B 367, 1665–1679, https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0005 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Rondinini, C., Battistoni, A., Peronace, V. & Teofili, C. Lista Rossa IUCN dei Vertebrati Italiani. (Comitato Italiano IUCN e Ministero dell’Ambiente e della Tutela del Territorio e del Mare, 2013).

  14. 14.

    European Community. Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora. Official Journal of the European Union L 206/7, 1–44 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Régnier, C. et al. Mass extinction in poorly known taxa. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112, 7761–7766, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1502350112 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Stuart, S. N. et al. Status and trends of amphibian declines and extinctions worldwide. Science 306, 1783–1786, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1103538 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Bellard, C., Bertelsmeier, C., Leadley, P., Thuiller, W. & Courchamp, F. Impacts of climate change on the future of biodiversity. Ecol Lett 15, 365–377, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01736.x (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Connette, G. M., Crawford, J. A. & Peterman, A. E. Climate change and shrinking salamanders: alternative mechanisms for changes in plethodontid salamander body size. Global Change Biology 21, 2834–2843, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12883 (2015).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Heinrichs, J. A., Bender, D. J. & Schumaker, N. H. Habitat degradation and loss as key drivers of regional population extinction. Ecological Modelling 335, 64–73, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.05.009 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Walters, R. J., Blanckenhorn, W. U. & Berger, D. Forecasting extinction risk of ectotherms under climate warming: an evolutionary perspective. Functional Ecology 26, 1324–1338, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2012.02045.x (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Zhang, Z. et al. Future climate change will severely reduce habitat suitability of the Critically Endangered Chinese giant salamander. Freshwater Biology 65, 971–980, https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.13483 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Bland, L. M. Global correlates of extinction risk in freshwater crayfish. Animal Conservation 20, 532–542, https://doi.org/10.1111/acv.12350 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Lunghi, E. et al. Photographic database of the European cave salamanders, genus Hydromantes. Sci Data 7, 171, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0513-8 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Mammola, S. et al. Continental data on cave-dwelling spider communities across Europe (Arachnida: Araneae). Biodivers Data J 7, e38492, https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.7.e38492 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    MacNeil, R. R. & Brcic, J. Coping with the subterranean environment: a thematic content analysis of the narratives of cave explorers. J Hum Perform Environ 13, Article 6, https://doi.org/10.7771/2327-2937.1089 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Zagmajster, M., Culver, D. C., Christman, M. C. & Sket, B. Evaluating the sampling bias in pattern of subterranean species richness: combining approaches. Biodivers Conserv 19, 3035–3048, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-010-9873-2 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Mammola, S. et al. Collecting eco-evolutionary data in the dark: Impediments to subterranean research and how to overcome them. Ecology and Evolution, https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7556 (2021).

  28. 28.

    Brown, A. W., Kaiser, K. A. & Allison, D. B. Issues with data and analyses: errors, underlying themes, and potential solutions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 115, 2563–2570, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708279115 (2018).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Crovetto, F., Romano, A. & Salvidio, S. Comparison of two non-lethal methods for dietary studies in terrestrial salamanders. Wildlife Research 39, 266–270, https://doi.org/10.1071/WR11103 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Lunghi, E. & Veith, M. Are Visual Implant Alpha tags adequate for individually marking European cave salamanders (genus Hydromantes)? Salamandra 53, 541–544 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Swanson, J. E., Bailey, L. L., Muths, E. & Funk, W. C. Factors influencing survival and mark retention in postmetamorphic Boreal chorus frogs. Copeia 2013, 670–675, https://doi.org/10.1643/CH-12-129 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Sacchi, R. et al. Photographic identification in reptiles: a matter of scales. Amphibia-Reptilia 31, 489–502 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Lunghi, E. et al. On the stability of the dorsal pattern of European cave salamanders (genus Hydromantes). Herpetozoa 32, 249–253, https://doi.org/10.3897/herpetozoa.32.e39030 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Lunghi, E. et al. What shapes the trophic niche of European plethodontid salamanders? PLoS ONE 13, e0205672, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205672 (2018).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Lunghi, E. et al. The post hoc measurement as a safe and reliable method to age and size plethodontid salamanders. Ecology and Evolution 10, 11111–11116, https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6748 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Hedrick, B. P. et al. Digitization and the future of natural history collections. BioScience 70, 243–251, https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biz163 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Nelson, G. & Ellis, S. The history and impact of digitization and digital data mobilization on biodiversity research. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 374, 20170391, https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0391 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Lunghi, E. et al. Interspecific and inter-population variation in individual diet specialization: do environmental factors have a role? Ecology 101, e03088, https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.3088 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Salvidio, S., Romano, A., Oneto, F., Ottonello, D. & Michelon, R. Different season, different strategies: feeding ecology of two syntopic forest-dwelling salamanders. Acta Oecol 43, 42–50 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Rosenblatt, A. E. et al. Factors affecting individual foraging specialization and temporal diet stability across the range of a large “generalist” apex predator. Oecologia 178, 5–16, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-014-3201-6 (2015).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Lunghi, E. et al. Same diet, different strategies: variability of individual feeding habits across three populations of Ambrosi’s cave salamander (Hydromantes ambrosii). Diversity 12, 180, https://doi.org/10.3390/d12050180 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Lunghi, E., Manenti, R. & Ficetola, G. F. Do cave features affect underground habitat exploitation by non-troglobite species? Acta Oecol 55, 29–35, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2013.11.003 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Lunghi, E. et al. Cave morphology, microclimate and abundance of five cave predators from the Monte Albo (Sardinia, Italy). Biodivers Data J 8, e48623, https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.8.e48623 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Carvalho-Rocha, V., Cortês, L. B. & Neckel-Oliveira, S. Interindividual patterns of resource use in three subtropical Atlantic Forest frogs. Austral Ecology 43, 150–158, https://doi.org/10.1111/aec.12552 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Lunghi, E. et al. Photos and stomach contents of two mainland Italian Speleomantes salamanders: data from summer 2020. figshare https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5398368 (2021).

  46. 46.

    Martel, A. et al. Batrachochytrium salamandrivorans sp. nov. causes lethal chytridiomycosis in amphibians. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110, 15325–15329, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1307356110 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Treilibs, C. E., Pavey, C. R., Hutchinson, M. N. & Bull, C. M. Photographic identification of individuals of a free-ranging, small terrestrial vertebrate. Ecology and Evolution 6, 800–809, https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1883 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Town, C., Marshall, A. & Sethasathien, N. Manta Matcher: automated photographic identification of manta rays using keypoint features. Ecology and Evolution 3, 1902–1914, https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.587 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    MacCoun, R. & Perlmutter, S. Hide results to seek the truth. Nature 526, 187–189, https://doi.org/10.1038/526187a (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Lunghi, E. et al. Thermal equilibrium and temperature differences among body regions in European plethodontid salamanders. J Therm Biol 60, 79–85, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2016.06.010 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Weller, H. I. & Westneat, M. W. Quantitative color profiling of digital images with earth mover’s distance using the R package colordistance. PeerJ 7, e6398, https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6398 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Adams, D., Collyer, M. & Kaliontzopoulou, A. geomorph. Geometric Morphometric Analyses of 2D/3D Landmark Data. R package version 3.2.1, https://github.com/geomorphR/geomorph (2020).

  53. 53.

    Bendik, N. F., Morrison, T. A., Gluesenkamp, A. G., Sanders, M. S. & O’Donnell, L. J. Computer-assisted photo identification outperforms visible implant elastomers in an endangered salamander, Eurycea tonkawae. PLoS ONE 8, e59424, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059424 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Renet, J., Leprêtre, L., Champagnon, J. & Lambret, P. Monitoring amphibian species with complex chromatophore patterns: a non-invasive approach with an evaluation of software effectiveness and reliability. Herpetological Journal 29, 13–22, https://doi.org/10.33256/hj29.1.1322 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Allen-Blevins, C. R., You, X., Hinde, K. & Sela, D. A. Handling stress may confound murine gut microbiota studies. PeerJ 5, e2876, https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2876 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Samimi, A. S., Tajik, J., Jarakani, S. & Shojaeepour, S. Evaluation of a five-minute resting period following handling stress on electrocardiogram parameters and cardiac rhythm in sheep. Veterinary Science Development 6, 6481, https://doi.org/10.4081/vsd.2016.6481 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Martel, A. et al. Recent introduction of a chytrid fungus endangers Western Palearctic salamanders. Science 346, 630, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1258268 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Lunghi, E., Corti, C., Manenti, R. & Ficetola, G. F. Consider species specialism when publishing datasets. Nat Ecol Evol 3, 319, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-0803-8 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was authorized by the Italian Ministry of the Environment (Ministero dell’Ambiente e della Tutela del Territorio e del Mare) with the PNM prot. n.56097/T-A31 of 13/11/2017. This study was conducted under the auspices of the Chinese Cavefish Working Group and supported by a grant from National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC- 31972868). Enrico Lunghi is supported by the Chinese Academy of Sciences President’s International Fellowship Initiative for postdoctoral researchers.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

E.L. conceived the study, prepared the table and the first draft of the manuscript; E.L., S.G., R.M. and G.F.F. performed field activities; E.L. and S.G. processed the pictures; S.G. prepared the figure; E.L. and F.C. examined stomach contents; all authors reviewed the manuscript and accepted its final version.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Enrico Lunghi or Yahui Zhao.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial and non-financial interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ applies to the metadata files associated with this article.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lunghi, E., Cianferoni, F., Giachello, S. et al. Updating salamander datasets with phenotypic and stomach content information for two mainland Speleomantes. Sci Data 8, 150 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-021-00931-w

Download citation

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing