Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Protocol
  • Published:

Enzyme immobilization on covalent organic framework supports

Abstract

Enzymes are natural catalysts with high catalytic activity, substrate specificity and selectivity. Their widespread utilization in industrial applications is limited by their sensitivity to harsh reaction conditions and difficulties relating to their removal and re-use after the reaction is complete. These limitations can be addressed by immobilizing the enzymes in solid porous supports. Covalent organic frameworks (COFs) are ideal candidate carriers because of their good biocompatibility, long-term water stability and large surface area. In post-synthetic immobilization, the enzyme is added to an existing COF; this has had limited success because of enzyme leaching and pore blockage by enzymes that are too large. Direct-immobilization methods—building the COF around the enzyme—allow tailored incorporation of proteins of any size and result in materials with lower levels of leaching and better mass transport of reactants and products. This protocol describes direct-immobilization methods that can be used to fabricate enzyme@COF (@ = engulfing) biocomposites with rationally programmed structures and functions. If COF construction requires harsh reaction conditions, the enzyme can be protected by using a removable metal-organic framework. Alternatively, a direct in situ approach, in which the enzyme and the COF monomers assemble under very mild conditions, can be used. Examples of both approaches are described: enzyme@COF-42-B/43-B capsules (enzymes including catalase, glucose oxidase, etc.) with ZIF-90 or ZPF-2 as protectors, and lipase@NKCOF-98/99 via in situ direct-immobilization methods (synthesis timing: 30–100 min). Example assays for physical and functional characterization of the COF and enzyme@COF materials are also described.

Key points

  • Covalent organic frameworks (COFs) protect enzymes from the harsh reaction conditions required for organic synthetic chemistry. If there is no enzyme leaching and pore blockage, enzyme removal and reuse are possible.

  • Direct in situ assembly of enzyme@COFs works for COFs that form under very mild reaction conditions. In cases in which harsher conditions are required, a sacrificial metal-organic framework can be constructed to protect the enzyme.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Overview of the fabrication approach of COF-enzyme biocomposites via direct-immobilization methods.
Fig. 2: Preparation of COFs and enzyme@COF capsules as described in Procedure 1.
Fig. 3: Preparation of enzyme@COF by the in situ method.
Fig. 4: Diagram of the process for synthesizing enzyme@COFs.
Fig. 5: Anticipated characterization results for fabricating BSA@COF capsules via the direct-immobilization method.
Fig. 6: Anticipated results for biocatalysis application of enzyme@COF capsules.
Fig. 7: Catalytic performance of various systems.
Fig. 8: Anticipated characterization results for fabricating lipase@NKCOF-98 via the in situ direct-immobilization method.
Fig. 9: Anticipated results of the activity and stability for fabricating lipase@COFs via the in situ direct-immobilization method.
Fig. 10: Anticipated results of the activity regulation for fabricating lipase@NKCOFs via the in situ direct-immobilization method.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The main data discussed in this protocol are available within the figures and the Supplementary Information. Additional data that support the findings of this study can be obtained from the corresponding author on request.

References

  1. Devine, P. N. et al. Extending the application of biocatalysis to meet the challenges of drug development. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2, 409–421 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Intasian, P. et al. Enzymes, in vivo biocatalysis, and metabolic engineering for enabling a circular economy and sustainability. Chem. Rev. 121, 10367–10451 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sheldon, R. A. & Woodley, J. M. Role of biocatalysis in sustainable chemistry. Chem. Rev. 118, 801–838 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sheldon, R. A. & van Pelt, S. Enzyme immobilisation in biocatalysis: why, what and how. Chem. Soc. Rev. 42, 6223–6235 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Liang, W. et al. Metal-organic framework-based enzyme biocomposites. Chem. Rev. 121, 1077–1129 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cantone, S. et al. Efficient immobilisation of industrial biocatalysts: criteria and constraints for the selection of organic polymeric carriers and immobilisation methods. Chem. Soc. Rev. 42, 6262–6276 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brogan, A. P. S., Bui-Le, L. & Hallett, J. P. Non-aqueous homogenous biocatalytic conversion of polysaccharides in ionic liquids using chemically modified glucosidase. Nat. Chem. 10, 859–865 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Quin, M. B. & Schmidt-Dannert, C. Engineering of biocatalysts: from evolution to creation. ACS Catal. 1, 1017–1021 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Sharma, A., Gupta, G., Ahmad, T., Mansoor, S. & Kaur, B. Enzyme engineering: current trends and future perspectives. Food Rev. Int. 37, 121–154 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Huang, S., Chen, G. & Ouyang, G. Confining enzymes in porous organic frameworks: from synthetic strategy and characterization to healthcare applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 51, 6824–6863 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mohamad, N. R., Marzuki, N. H., Buang, N. A., Huyop, F. & Wahab, R. A. An overview of technologies for immobilization of enzymes and surface analysis techniques for immobilized enzymes. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 29, 205–220 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. An, H. et al. Incorporation of biomolecules in metal-organic frameworks for advanced applications. Coord. Chem. Rev. 384, 90–106 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hudson, S., Cooney, J. & Magner, E. Proteins in mesoporous silicates. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 47, 8582–8594 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fried, D. I., Brieler, F. J. & Fröba, M. Designing inorganic porous materials for enzyme adsorption and applications in biocatalysis. ChemCatChem 5, 862–884 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kandambeth, S. et al. Self-templated chemically stable hollow spherical covalent organic framework. Nat. Commun. 6, 6786 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sun, Q., Aguila, B., Lan, P. C. & Ma, S. Tuning pore heterogeneity in covalent organic frameworks for enhanced enzyme accessibility and resistance against denaturants. Adv. Mater. 31, e1900008 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Côté, A. P. et al. Porous, crystalline, covalent organic frameworks. Science 310, 1166–1170 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Esrafili, A., Wagner, A., Inamdar, S. & Acharya, A. P. Covalent organic frameworks for biomedical applications. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 10, e2002090 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen, Y. et al. Cell membrane-anchoring covalent organic framework nanosheets for single-laser-triggered synergistic tumor therapy. Chem. Commun. 57, 11685–11688 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sun, Q. et al. Covalent organic framework based nanoagent for enhanced mild-temperature photothermal therapy. Biomater. Sci. 9, 7977–7983 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang, P. et al. Melt polymerization synthesis of a class of robust self-shaped olefin-linked COF foams as high-efficiency separators. Sci. China Chem. 65, 1173–1184 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mu, Z. et al. Covalent organic frameworks with record pore apertures. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 5145–5154 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Xing, C. et al. Enhancing enzyme activity by the modulation of covalent interactions in the confined channels of covalent organic frameworks. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 61, e202201378 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang, C. & Liao, K. Recent advances in emerging metal- and covalent-organic frameworks for enzyme encapsulation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13, 56752–56776 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sun, Q. et al. Pore environment control and enhanced performance of enzymes infiltrated in covalent organic frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 984–992 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tang, Y. et al. Fabrication of hollow covalent-organic framework microspheres via emulsion-interfacial strategy to enhance laccase immobilization for tetracycline degradation. Chem. Eng. J. 421, 129743 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhao, Z. et al. Engineering olefin-linked covalent organic frameworks for photoenzymatic reduction of CO2. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 61, e202200261 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Jin, C. et al. Enzyme immobilization in porphyrinic covalent organic frameworks for photoenzymatic asymmetric catalysis. ACS Catal. 12, 8259–8268 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang, S. et al. Covalent organic frameworks with chirality enriched by biomolecules for efficient chiral separation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 57, 16754–16759 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Chao, H. et al. Template-free in situ encapsulation of enzymes in hollow covalent organic framework capsules for the electrochemical analysis of biomarkers. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 14, 20641–20651 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Huang, N., Wang, P. & Jiang, D. Covalent organic frameworks: a materials platform for structural and functional designs. Nat. Rev. Mater. 1, 16068 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Zheng, Y. et al. Green and scalable fabrication of high-performance biocatalysts using covalent organic frameworks as enzyme carriers. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 61, e202208744 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Liang, K. et al. Biomimetic mineralization of metal-organic frameworks as protective coatings for biomacromolecules. Nat. Commun. 6, 7240 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Feng, Y. et al. Antibodies@MOFs: an in vitro protective coating for preparation and storage of biopharmaceuticals. Adv. Mater. 31, e1805148 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Li, M. et al. Fabricating covalent organic framework capsules with commodious microenvironment for enzymes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 6675–6681 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Liang, H., Wang, L., Yang, Y., Song, Y. & Wang, L. A novel biosensor based on multienzyme microcapsules constructed from covalent-organic framework. Biosens. Bioelectron. 193, 113553 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Chen, G. et al. A convenient and versatile amino-acid-boosted biomimetic strategy for the nondestructive encapsulation of biomacromolecules within metal-organic frameworks. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 58, 1463–1467 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Wu, Z. et al. Covalent organic networks for in situ entrapment of enzymes with superior robustness and durability. Chem. Eng. J. 450, 138446 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Maddigan, N. K. et al. Protein surface functionalisation as a general strategy for facilitating biomimetic mineralisation of ZIF-8. Chem. Sci. 9, 4217–4223 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Chen, G. et al. Modulating the biofunctionality of metal-organic-framework-encapsulated enzymes through controllable embedding patterns. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 59, 2867–2874 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (22022808).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Q.Z. and Y.Z. contributed equally. All authors contributed to the development of the protocol and the design of the experiments.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zhenjie Zhang or Yao Chen.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Protocols thanks Peter Crowley and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Related links

Key references using this protocol

Li, M. et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 6675–6681 (2020): https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.0c00285

Zheng, Y. et al. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 61, e202208744 (2022): https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202208744

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–22 and Table 1

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, Q., Zheng, Y., Zhang, Z. et al. Enzyme immobilization on covalent organic framework supports. Nat Protoc 18, 3080–3125 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-023-00868-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-023-00868-x

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing