Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Protocol
  • Published:

An inexpensive semi-automated sample processing pipeline for cell-free RNA extraction

Abstract

Despite advances in automated liquid handling and microfluidics, preparing samples for RNA sequencing at scale generally requires expensive equipment, which is beyond the reach of many academic laboratories. Manual sample preparation remains a slow, expensive and error-prone process. Here, we describe a low-cost, semi-automated pipeline to extract cell-free RNA using one of two commercially available, inexpensive and open-source robotic systems: the Opentrons OT1.0 or OT2.0. Like many RNA isolation protocols, ours can be decomposed into three subparts: RNA extraction, DNA digestion and RNA cleaning and concentration. RT–qPCR data using a synthetic spike-in confirms comparable RNA quality to the gold standard, manual sample processing. The semi-automated pipeline also shows improvement in sample throughput (+12×), time spent (−11×), cost (−3×) and biohazardous waste produced (−4×) compared with its manual counterpart. This protocol enables cell-free RNA extraction from 96 samples simultaneously in 4.5 h; in practice, this dramatically improves the time to results, as we recently demonstrated. Importantly, any laboratory already has most of the parts required (manual pipette and corresponding tips and kits for RNA isolation, cleaning and concentration) to build a semi-automated sample processing pipeline of their own and would only need to purchase or three-dimensionally print a few extra parts (US$5.5 K–12 K in total). This pipeline is also generalizable for many nucleic acid extraction applications, thereby increasing the scale of studies, which can be performed in small research laboratories.

Key points

  • A protocol for setting up, calibrating and validating a semi-automated sample processing pipeline for cell-free RNA isolation from clinical samples using the Opentrons 1.0 or 2.0 open-source robotic platform.

  • The key benefits of this semi-automated system, as compared with manual extraction, include an increase in sample throughput by 12 fold. When compared with other available protocols for automated RNA extraction, this protocol provides a complementary option for larger sample volumes (>0.5 mL).

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Comparison of manual and semi-automated cfRNA extraction protocol.
Fig. 2: Overview of robotic system and comparison of setup using OT1 and OT2.
Fig. 3: Semi-automated RNA isolation system validation using a synthetic RNA control.
Fig. 4: Validation of custom RNA control, ERCC54 and its corresponding TaqMan probes across a range of oligonucleotide input amounts.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Source data are provided with this paper. This file includes raw data to reproduce Fig. 3b–d and Fig. 4. The Supplementary Manual also includes instructions for how to build a system similar to the OT1 from scratch.

Code availability

All software, including the data analysis required to generate Figs. 3 and 4, are available at https://github.com/miramou/cfRNA_pipeline_automation (https://doi.org/10.5821/zenodo.7931552) (ref. 24) and https://github.com/miramou/cfRNA_pipeline (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7931554) (ref. 25).

References

  1. Koh, W. et al. Noninvasive in vivo monitoring of tissue-specific global gene expression in humans. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 7361–7366 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Fan, H. C. et al. Non-invasive prenatal measurement of the fetal genome. Nature 487, 320–324 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Lo, Y. M. D. et al. Maternal plasma DNA sequencing reveals the genome-wide genetic and mutational profile of the fetus. Sci. Transl. Med. 2, 61ra91 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tsang, J. C. H. et al. Integrative single-cell and cell-free plasma RNA transcriptomics elucidates placental cellular dynamics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, E7786–E7795 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Pan, W. et al. Simultaneously monitoring immune response and microbial infections during pregnancy through plasma cfRNA sequencing. Clin. Chem. 63, 1695–1704 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Song, C.-X., Diao, J., Brunger, A. T. & Quake, S. R. Simultaneous single molecule epigenetic imaging of DNA methylation and hydroxymethylation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 4338–4343 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Crowley, E., Di Nicolantonio, F., Loupakis, F. & Bardelli, A. Liquid biopsy: monitoring cancer-genetics in the blood. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 10, 472–484 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Song, C.-X. et al. 5-Hydroxymethylcytosine signatures in cell-free DNA provide information about tumor types and stages. Cell Res. 27, 1231–1242 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu, M. C. et al. Sensitive and specific multi-cancer detection and localization using methylation signatures in cell-free DNA. Ann. Oncol. 31, 745–759 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Snyder, T. M., Khush, K. K., Valantine, H. A. & Quake, S. R. Universal noninvasive detection of solid organ transplant rejection. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 6229–6234 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Sharon, E. et al. Quantification of transplant-derived circulating cell-free DNA in absence of a donor genotype. PLoS Comput. Biol. 13, e1005629 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Fan, H. C., Blumenfeld, Y. J., Chitkara, U., Hudgins, L. & Quake, S. R. Noninvasive diagnosis of fetal aneuploidy by shotgun sequencing DNA from maternal blood. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 16266–16271 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Ngo, T. T. M. et al. Noninvasive blood tests for fetal development predict gestational age and preterm delivery. Science 360, 1133–1136 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Moufarrej, M. N. et al. Early prediction of preeclampsia in pregnancy with cell-free RNA. Nature 602, 689–694 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Rasmussen, M. et al. RNA profiles reveal signatures of future health and disease in pregnancy. Nature 601, 422–427 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Camunas-Soler, J. et al. Predictive RNA profiles for early and very early spontaneous preterm birth. Am. J. Obstet. 227, 72.e1–72.e16 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Aghaeepour, N. et al. An immune clock of human pregnancy. Sci. Immunol. 2, eaan3946 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Aghaeepour, N. et al. A proteomic clock of human pregnancy. Am. J. Obstet. 218, 347.e1–347.e14 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ghaemi, M. S. et al. Multiomics modeling of the immunome, transcriptome, microbiome, proteome and metabolome adaptations during human pregnancy. Bioinformatics 35, 95–103 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tan, S. C. & Yiap, B. C. DNA, RNA, and protein extraction: the past and the present. Biomed Res. Int. 2009, 574398 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lazaro-Perona, F. et al. Evaluation of two automated low-cost RNA extraction protocols for SARS-CoV-2 detection. PloS One 16, e0246302 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Mamanova, L. et al. High-throughput full-length single-cell RNA-seq automation. Nat. Protoc. 16, 2886–2915 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Moufarrej, M. N., Wong, R. J., Shaw, G. M., Stevenson, D. K. & Quake, S. R. Investigating pregnancy and its complications using circulating cell-free RNA in women’s blood during gestation. Front. Pediatr. 8, 605219 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Moufarrej, M. N., An inexpensive, semi-automated sample processing pipeline for cell-free RNA extraction, https://github.com/miramou/cfRNA_pipeline_automation, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7931552 (2023).

  25. Moufarrej, M. N., An inexpensive, semi-automated sample processing pipeline for cell-free RNA extraction, https://github.com/miramou/cfrna_pipeline, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7931554 (2023).

  26. Moufarrej, M. N., Early prediction of preeclampsia in pregnancy with cell-free RNA, https://github.com/miramou/pe_cfrna, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7931550 (2022).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to both N. Neff and R. Sit for their sequencing expertise. We also thank B. Yu for helping brainstorm and providing indispensable advice around how to best use the Opentrons system. Figures 1 and 2D,E were created with BioRender.com. This work was supported by the Chan Zuckerberg Biohub. M.N.M. is supported by the Stanford Bio-X Bowes Fellowship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

M.N.M. conceptualized and designed this protocol, and collected and analyzed the data in collaboration with S.R.Q. All authors contributed to the writing and editing of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen R. Quake.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

S.R.Q. is a founder, consultant and shareholder of Mirvie. M.N.M. is also a shareholder of Mirvie.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Protocols thanks Eleni Tomazou and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Related links

Key references using this protocol

Moufarrej, M. N. et al. Nature 602, 689–694 (2022): https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04410-z

Moufarrej, M. (2020): https://youtu.be/g6RsSaNvSNA

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Manual.

Source data

Source Data Figs. 3 and 4

Unprocessed RT–qPCR data for Figs. 3a–c and 4.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moufarrej, M.N., Quake, S.R. An inexpensive semi-automated sample processing pipeline for cell-free RNA extraction. Nat Protoc 18, 2772–2793 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-023-00855-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-023-00855-2

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing AI and Robotics

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics newsletter — what matters in AI and robotics research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics