Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Chronic, cortex-wide imaging of specific cell populations during behavior

Abstract

Measurements of neuronal activity across brain areas are important for understanding the neural correlates of cognitive and motor processes such as attention, decision-making and action selection. However, techniques that allow cellular resolution measurements are expensive and require a high degree of technical expertise, which limits their broad use. Wide-field imaging of genetically encoded indicators is a high-throughput, cost-effective and flexible approach to measure activity of specific cell populations with high temporal resolution and a cortex-wide field of view. Here we outline our protocol for assembling a wide-field macroscope setup, performing surgery to prepare the intact skull and imaging neural activity chronically in behaving, transgenic mice. Further, we highlight a processing pipeline that leverages novel, cloud-based methods to analyze large-scale imaging datasets. The protocol targets laboratories that are seeking to build macroscopes, optimize surgical procedures for long-term chronic imaging and/or analyze cortex-wide neuronal recordings. The entire protocol, including steps for assembly and calibration of the macroscope, surgical preparation, imaging and data analysis, requires a total of 8 h. It is designed to be accessible to laboratories with limited expertise in imaging methods or interest in high-throughput imaging during behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Overview of the procedure described in this protocol.
Fig. 2: Acquisition in rolling shutter, dual color excitation mode and synchronization.
Fig. 3: Correction of hemodynamic artifacts with alternating violet and blue illumination.
Fig. 4: Detailed build instructions for the wide-field macroscope.
Fig. 5: Overview of the surgical procedures.
Fig. 6: Diagram of the data processing pipeline.
Fig. 7: Wide-field imaging applications.

Data availability

The raw datasets used to generate the visual sign, stimuli triggered averages and linear regression analysis maps are available in a public repository, maintained by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory with https://doi.org/10.14224/1.38599. Example datasets to test the analysis pipeline are at http://labshare.cshl.edu/shares/library/repository/38599/2021-01-20-Update/.

Code availability

Source code used in this protocol is available in the online repositories without access restrictions under a general public license at https://github.com/churchlandlab. The code and NeuroCAAS platform will remain available for the foreseeable future.

References

  1. 1.

    Stringer, C. et al. Spontaneous behaviors drive multidimensional, brainwide activity. Science 364, 255 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Vanni, M. P., Chan, A. W., Balbi, M., Silasi, G. & Murphy, T. H. Mesoscale mapping of mouse cortex reveals frequency-dependent cycling between distinct macroscale functional modules. J. Neurosci. 37, 7513–7533 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Clancy, K. B., Orsolic, I. & Mrsic-Flogel, T. D. Locomotion-dependent remapping of distributed cortical networks. Nat. Neurosci. 22, 778–786 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Musall, S., Kaufman, M. T., Juavinett, A. L., Gluf, S. & Churchland, A. K. Single-trial neural dynamics are dominated by richly varied movements. Nat. Neurosci. 22, 1677–1686 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Allen, W. E. et al. Global representations of goal-directed behavior in distinct cell types of mouse neocortex. Neuron 94, 891–907.e6 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Pinto, L. et al. Task-dependent changes in the large-scale dynamics and necessity of cortical regions. Neuron 104, 810–824.e9 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Zatka-Haas, P., Steinmetz, N. A., Carandini, M. & Harris, K. D. A perceptual decision requires sensory but not action coding in mouse cortex. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/501627 (2020).

  8. 8.

    Salkoff, D. B., Zagha, E., McCarthy, E. & McCormick, D. A. Movement and performance explain widespread cortical activity in a visual detection task. Cereb. Cortex 30, 421–437 (2020).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Grinvald, A., Lieke, E., Frostig, R. D., Gilbert, C. D. & Wiesel, T. N. Functional architecture of cortex revealed by optical imaging of intrinsic signals. Nature 324, 361–364 (1986).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Frostig, R. D., Lieke, E. E., Ts’o, D. Y. & Grinvald, A. Cortical functional architecture and local coupling between neuronal activity and the microcirculation revealed by in vivo high-resolution optical imaging of intrinsic signals. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 87, 6082–6086 (1990).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Shmuel, A. & Grinvald, A. Functional organization for direction of motion and its relationship to orientation maps in cat area 18. J. Neurosci. 16, 6945–6964 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Garrett, M. E., Nauhaus, I., Marshel, J. H. & Callaway, E. M. Topography and areal organization of mouse visual cortex. J. Neurosci. 34, 12587–12600 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Andermann, M. L., Kerlin, A. M., Roumis, D. K., Glickfeld, L. L. & Reid, R. C. Functional specialization of mouse higher visual cortical areas. Neuron 72, 1025–1039 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Juavinett, A. L., Nauhaus, I., Garrett, M. E., Zhuang, J. & Callaway, E. M. Automated identification of mouse visual areas with intrinsic signal imaging. Nat. Protoc. 12, 32–43 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Ferezou, I. et al. Spatiotemporal dynamics of cortical sensorimotor integration in behaving mice. Neuron 56, 907–923 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Akemann, W., Mutoh, H., Perron, A., Rossier, J. & Knöpfel, T. Imaging brain electric signals with genetically targeted voltage-sensitive fluorescent proteins. Nat. Methods 7, 643–649 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Wekselblatt, J. B., Flister, E. D., Piscopo, D. M. & Niell, C. M. Large-scale imaging of cortical dynamics during sensory perception and behavior. J. Neurophysiol. 115, 2852–2866 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Gilad, A., Gallero-Salas, Y., Groos, D. & Helmchen, F. Behavioral strategy determines frontal or posterior location of short-term memory in neocortex. Neuron 99, 814–828.e7 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Guo, Z. V. et al. Flow of cortical activity underlying a tactile decision in mice. Neuron 81, 179–194 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Silasi, G., Xiao, D., Vanni, M. P., Chen, A. C. N. & Murphy, T. H. Intact skull chronic windows for mesoscopic wide-field imaging in awake mice. J Neurosci Methods 267, 141–149 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Cunningham, J. P. & Yu, B. M. Dimensionality reduction for large-scale neural recordings. Nat. Neurosci. 17, 1500–1509 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Buchanan, E. K. et al. Penalized matrix decomposition for denoising, compression, and improved demixing of functional imaging data. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.06203 (2018).

  23. 23.

    Saxena, S. et al. Localized semi-nonnegative matrix factorization (LocaNMF) of widefield calcium imaging data. PLoS Comput. Biol. 16, e1007791 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Kim, E. J., Juavinett, A. L., Kyubwa, E. M., Jacobs, M. W. & Callaway, E. M. Three types of cortical layer 5 neurons that differ in brain-wide connectivity and function. Neuron 88, 1253–1267 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Matho, K. S. et al. Genetic dissection of glutamatergic neuron subpopulations and developmental trajectories in the cerebral cortex. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.22.054064 (2020).

  26. 26.

    Murphy, T. H. et al. High-throughput automated home-cage mesoscopic functional imaging of mouse cortex. Nat. Commun. 7, 11611 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Murphy, T. H. et al. Automated task training and longitudinal monitoring of mouse mesoscale cortical circuits using home cages. eLife 9, e55964 (2020).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Cramer, J. V. et al. In vivo widefield calcium imaging of the mouse cortex for analysis of network connectivity in health and brain disease. NeuroImage 199, 570–584 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Shimaoka, D., Harris, K. D. & Carandini, M. Effects of arousal on mouse sensory cortex depend on modality. Cell Rep. 25, 3230 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Dana, H. et al. Sensitive red protein calcium indicators for imaging neural activity. eLife 5, e12727 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Xiao, D. et al. Mapping cortical mesoscopic networks of single spiking cortical or sub-cortical neurons. eLife 6, e19976 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Deffieux, T., Demene, C., Pernot, M. & Tanter, M. Functional ultrasound neuroimaging: a review of the preclinical and clinical state of the art. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 50, 128–135 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Lake, E. M. R. et al. Simultaneous cortex-wide fluorescence Ca 2+ imaging and whole-brain fMRI. Nat. Methods 17, 1262–1271 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Shemesh, O. A. et al. Precision calcium imaging of dense neural populations via a cell body-targeted calcium indicator. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/773069 (2019).

  35. 35.

    Abe, T., Kinsella, I., Saxena, S., Paninski, L. & Cunningham, J. P. Neuroscience cloud analysis as a service. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.11.146746 (2020).

  36. 36.

    Ratzlaff, E. H. & Grinvald, A. A tandem-lens epifluorescence macroscope: hundred-fold brightness advantage for wide-field imaging. J. Neurosci. Methods 36, 127–137 (1991).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Chen, T.-W. et al. Ultrasensitive fluorescent proteins for imaging neuronal activity. Nature 499, 295–300 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Ma, Y. et al. Wide-field optical mapping of neural activity and brain haemodynamics: considerations and novel approaches. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 371, 20150360 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Musall, S., Haiss, F., Weber, B. & von der Behrens, W. Deviant processing in the primary somatosensory cortex. Cereb. Cortex 27, 863–876 (2015).

  40. 40.

    Lerner, T. N. et al. Intact-brain analyses reveal distinct information carried by SNc dopamine subcircuits. Cell 162, 635–647 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Valley, M. T. et al. Separation of hemodynamic signals from GCaMP fluorescence measured with wide-field imaging. J. Neurophysiol. 123, 356–366 (2019).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Vanni, M. P. & Murphy, T. H. Mesoscale transcranial spontaneous activity mapping in GCaMP3 transgenic mice reveals extensive reciprocal connections between areas of somatomotor cortex. J. Neurosci. 34, 15931–15946 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Xiao, D. et al. Mapping cortical mesoscopic networks of single spiking cortical or sub-cortical neurons. eLife. 6, e19976 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Kim, T. H. et al. Long-term optical access to an estimated one million neurons in the live mouse cortex. Cell Rep. 17, 3385–3394 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Ghanbari, L. et al. Cortex-wide neural interfacing via transparent polymer skulls. Nat. Commun. 10, 1500 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Steinmetz, N. A., Zatka-Haas, P., Carandini, M. & Harris, K. D. Distributed coding of choice, action and engagement across the mouse brain. Nature 576, 266–273 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Steinmetz, N. A. et al. Aberrant cortical activity in multiple GCaMP6-expressing transgenic mouse lines. eNeuro https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0207-17.2017 (2017).

  48. 48.

    Oh, S. W. et al. A mesoscale connectome of the mouse brain. Nature 508, 207–214 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Gilad, A. & Helmchen, F. Spatiotemporal refinement of signal flow through association cortex during learning. Nat. Commun. 11, 1–14 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Montgomery, M. K. et al. Glioma-induced alterations in neuronal activity and neurovascular coupling during disease progression. Cell Rep. 31, 107500 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank M. Kaufman and K. Odoemene for help with developing early versions of the protocol; P. Gupta, F. Albeanu and J. Wekselblatt for technical advice; N. Steinmetz, M. Pachitariu and K. Harris for help with wide-field analysis; and Z. Josh Huang for providing FezF2 mice. Financial support was received from the Swiss National Science foundation (S.M., grant no. P2ZHP3_161770), the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation, DFG - 368482240/GRK2416), the NIH (grant no. EY R01EY022979 and BRAIN initiative 5R01EB026949) and the Army Research Office under contract no. W911NF-16-1-0368 as part of the collaboration between the US DOD, the UK MOD and the UK Engineering and Physical Research Council under the Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative (A.K.C.). X.R.S. was supported by the NINDS BRAIN Initiative of the National Institutes of Health under award number F32MH120888. T.A. was supported by NIH training grant 2T32NS064929-11. S.S. was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation P400P2 186759 and NIH 5U19NS104649. J.P.C. was supported by Simons 542963 and the McKnight Foundation. L.P. was funded by IARPA MICRONS D16PC00003, NIH 5U01NS103489, 5U19NS104649, 5U19NS107613, 1UF1NS107696, 1UF1NS108213, 1RF1MH120680, DARPA NESD N66001-17-C-4002 and Simons Foundation 543023. L.P. and J.P.C. were supported by NSF Neuronex Award DBI-1707398.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

S.M. and A.K.C. conceptualized early versions of the procedures. S.M. and S.G. implemented early setup versions and acquisition workflow. S.M., X.R.S. and J.C. refined surgical procedures. All authors refined the macroscope building procedures and compiled the required part lists. S.M. and J.C. wrote acquisition software. S.M., X.R.S. and S.G. prepared animals and acquired data in the expected results. J.C., S.M., I.K. and S.S. wrote software for analysis. T.A., I.K., S.S., J.P.C. and L.P conceptualized the general analysis workflow. T.A., I.K. and S.S. deployed software on NeuroCAAS with input from J.C. and S.M.. A.K., J.C. and S.M. prepared figures. J.C., S.M., S.G., A.K. and A.K.C. wrote the manuscript with input from all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne K. Churchland.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Protocols thanks Ariel Gilad and the other, anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Related links

Key reference using this protocol

Musall, S. et al. Nat. Neurosci. 22, 1677–1686 (2019): https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-019-0502-4

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Photobleaching due to repeated or high-power imaging.

a, Photochemical degradation of the fluorophore can occur over days because of repeated imaging. Decrease in fluorescence can be observed after 10 min when imaging at more than 50 mW of blue light (blue trace); signals are more stable at lower intensities (black, cyan traces). b, Top: images from a mouse expressing GCaMP6 in a subpopulation of cortical excitatory projection neurons. Visible decrease in overall fluorescence is evident after daily imaging at day 5 and 10. Bottom: histogram of pixel intensities corresponding to the images above.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Steps for setup calibration.

a, Alignment of the excitation dichroic. b, Alignment of the emission dichroic using Camware. c, Procedure for obtaining uniform illumination with the Camware software and the line profiler. The WidefieldImager also has a calibration mode with similar functionality and supporting cameras from multiple vendors.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Couto, J., Musall, S., Sun, X.R. et al. Chronic, cortex-wide imaging of specific cell populations during behavior. Nat Protoc 16, 3241–3263 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-021-00527-z

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing