Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Protocol
  • Published:

A whole-tissue RNA-seq toolkit for organism-wide studies of gene expression with PME-seq

Abstract

The immune system operates at the scale of the whole organism in mammals. We currently lack experimental approaches to systematically track and study organism-wide molecular processes in mice. Here we describe an integrated toolkit for measuring gene expression in whole tissues, 3-prime mRNA extension sequencing, that is applicable to most mouse organs and any mouse model of interest. Further, the methods of RNA-seq described in this protocol are broadly applicable to other sample types beyond whole organs, such as tissue samples or isolated cell populations. We report procedures to collect, store and lyse a dozen organ types using conditions compatible with the extraction of high-quality RNA. In addition, we detail protocols to perform high-throughput and low-cost RNA extraction and sequencing, as well as downstream data analysis. The protocol takes 5 d to process 384 mouse organs from collecting tissues to obtaining raw sequencing data, with additional time required for data analysis and mining. The protocol is accessible to individuals with basic skills in (i) mouse perfusion and dissection for sample collection and (ii) computation using Unix and R for data analysis. Overall, the methods presented here fill a gap in our toolbox for studying organism-wide processes in immunology and physiology.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Schematic overview of the PME-seq workflow.
Fig. 2: Anticipated results for RNA quality and library preparation.
Fig. 3: Patterns of mRNA expression and tissue-specific genes are similar between our protocol and existing mouse and human consortium data sets.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The example datasets used in this protocol are available in the Gene Expression Omnibus under accession number GSE138103.

Code availability

All scripts are available at https://github.com/chevrierlab/PME-seq.

References

  1. Kadoki, M. et al. Organism-level analysis of vaccination reveals networks of protection across tissues. Cell 171, 398–413.e21 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mackay, L. K. & Prier, J. E. Mapping organism-wide immune responses. Trends Immunol. 39, 1–2 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Masopust, D., Sivula, C. P. & Jameson, S. C. Of mice, dirty mice, and men: using mice to understand human immunology. J. Immunol. 199, 383–388 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Churchill, G. A. et al. The Collaborative Cross, a community resource for the genetic analysis of complex traits. Nat. Genet. 36, 1133–1137 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lonsdale, J. et al. The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project. Nat. Genet. 45, 580 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tang, T. et al. A mouse knockout library for secreted and transmembrane proteins. Nat. Biotechnol. 28, 749 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sage, P. T. et al. Suppression by TFR cells leads to durable and selective inhibition of B cell effector function. Nat. Immunol. 17, 1436–1446 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hou, S. et al. FoxP3 and Ezh2 regulate Tfr cell suppressive function and transcriptional program. J. Exp. Med. 216, 605–620 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Shultz, L. D. et al. Humanized mouse models of immunological diseases and precision medicine. Mamm. Genome 30, 123–142 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Weigert, R., mkova, M., Parente, L., Amornphimoltham, P. & Masedunskas, A. Intravital microscopy: a novel tool to study cell biology in living animals. Histochem. Cell Biol. 133, 481–491 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Reinhardt, L. R., Khoruts, A., Merica, R., Zell, T. & Jenkins, M. K. Visualizing the generation of memory CD4 T cells in the whole body. Nature 410, 101 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Southern, P. J., Blount, P. & Oldstone, M. B. Analysis of persistent virus infections by in situ hybridization to whole-mouse sections. Nature 312, 555–558 (1984).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Treweek, J. B. et al. Whole-body tissue stabilization and selective extractions via tissue-hydrogel hybrids for high-resolution intact circuit mapping and phenotyping. Nat. Protoc. 10, 1860–1896 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tainaka, K. et al. Whole-body imaging with single-cell resolution by tissue decolorization. Cell 159, 911–924 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Pan, C. et al. Shrinkage-mediated imaging of entire organs and organisms using uDISCO. Nat. Methods 13, 859–867 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kubota, S. I. et al. Whole-body profiling of cancer metastasis with single-cell resolution. Cell Rep. 20, 236–250 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Steinert, E. M. et al. Quantifying memory CD8 T cells reveals regionalization of immunosurveillance. Cell 161, 737–749 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hou, P. et al. Genome editing of CXCR4 by CRISPR/cas9 confers cells resistant to HIV-1 infection. Sci. Rep. 5, 15577 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Reed, E. et al. Assessment of a highly multiplexed RNA sequencing platform and comparison to existing high-throughput gene expression profiling techniques. Front. Genet. 10, 150 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Alpern, D. et al. BRB-seq: ultra-affordable high-throughput transcriptomics enabled by bulk RNA barcoding and sequencing. Genome Biol. 20, 71 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hashimshony, T. et al. CEL-Seq2: sensitive highly-multiplexed single-cell RNA-Seq. Genome Biol. 17, 77 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Shishkin, A. A. et al. Simultaneous generation of many RNA-seq libraries in a single reaction. Nat. Methods 12, 323–325 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Picelli, S. et al. Full-length RNA-seq from single cells using Smart-seq2. Nat. Protoc. 9, 171 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Avraham, R. et al. A highly multiplexed and sensitive RNA-seq protocol for simultaneous analysis of host and pathogen transcriptomes. Nat. Protoc. 11, 1477–1491 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. McLaughlin, L. W., Romaniuk, E., Romaniuk, P. J. & Neilson, T. The effect of acceptor oligoribonucleotide sequence on the T4 RNA ligase reaction. Eur. J. Biochem. 125, 639–643 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hafner, M. et al. RNA-ligase-dependent biases in miRNA representation in deep-sequenced small RNA cDNA libraries. RNA 17, 1697–1712 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Fuchs, R. T., Sun, Z., Zhuang, F. & Robb, B. G. Bias in ligation-based small RNA sequencing library construction is determined by adaptor and RNA structure. PloS One 10, e0126049 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Lecanda, A. et al. Dual randomization of oligonucleotides to reduce the bias in ribosome-profiling libraries. Methods 107, 89–97 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Anderson, K. G. et al. Intravascular staining for discrimination of vascular and tissue leukocytes. Nat. Protoc. 9, 209–222 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Korin, B., Dubovik, T. & Rolls, A. Mass cytometry analysis of immune cells in the brain. Nat. Protoc. 13, 377 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Islam, S. et al. Quantitative single-cell RNA-seq with unique molecular identifiers. Nat. Methods 11, 163–166 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Shen-Orr, S. S. & Gaujoux, R. Computational deconvolution: extracting cell type-specific information from heterogeneous samples. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 25, 571–578 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Robinson, M. D., McCarthy, D. J. & Smyth, G. K. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26, 139–140 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Ritchie, M. E. et al. limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, e47 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Okonechnikov, K., Conesa, A. & García-Alcalde, F. Qualimap 2: advanced multi-sample quality control for high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics 32, 292–294 (2016).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. McCarthy, D. J., Chen, Y. & Smyth, G. K. Differential expression analysis of multifactor RNA-Seq experiments with respect to biological variation. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 4288–4297 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Melé, M. et al. The human transcriptome across tissues and individuals. Science 348, 660–665 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Davis, C. A. et al. The Encyclopedia of DNA elements (ENCODE): data portal update. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, D794–D801 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Li, B. et al. A comprehensive mouse transcriptomic BodyMap across 17 tissues by RNA-seq. Sci. Rep. 7, 4200 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank M. Kadoki, T. Matsui and S. Tay for helpful discussions. This work was supported by an Overseas Research Fellowship from the Astellas Foundation for Research on Metabolic Disorders (M.T.), an NIH Director’s New Innovator Award DP2 (AI145100), an Institutional Research Grant (IRG-16-222-56) from the American Cancer Society, the University of Chicago Medicine Comprehensive Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA14599), the Elliot and Ruth Sigal MRA Young Investigator Award (571146) and funds from the Pritzker School of Molecular Engineering (N.C.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization, N.C.; methodology and investigation, S.P., M.T., M.Z., K.C. and N.C.; formal analysis, A.G. and N.C.; writing, S.P., A.G. and N.C.; supervision and funding acquisition, N.C.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicolas Chevrier.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Protocols thanks Zhou Xing and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Related links

Key references using this protocol

Kadoki, M. et al. Cell 171, 398–413 (2017): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2017.08.024

Sage, P. T. et al. Nat. Immunol. 17, 1436–1446 (2016): https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.3578

Hou, S. et al. J. Exp. Med. 216, 605 (2019): https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20181134

Integrated supplementary information

Supplementary Fig. 1 Setup of the peristaltic pump and associated materials to perform transcardial perfusion followed by tissue collections.

a, Materials for the peristaltic pump setup. Shown are all equipment, materials and associated catalog numbers. Before using a vacutainer, the opposite end of the butterfly needle is cut off and discarded. b, Peristaltic pump ready to use for perfusion. Tubing is linked to the vacutainer through a connector (Gilson, cat. no. F1179941). On the opposite side of the tubing, the tubing is connected to another piece of tubing by a connector (Gilson, cat. no. F117987), and the connection is wrapped with parafilm. c, Example setup for transcardial perfusion followed by tissue collection. In this case, Vesphene is used as a disinfectant for decontamination purposes when working with infectious materials.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Fig. 1 and Supplementary Methods.

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Software 1

Suite of scripts (1 of 3) to use for RNA extraction automation using the Agilent Bravo liquid handling platform.

Supplementary Software 2

Suite of scripts (2 of 3) to use for RNA extraction automation using the Agilent Bravo liquid handling platform.

Supplementary Software 3

Suite of scripts (3 of 3) to use for RNA extraction automation using the Agilent Bravo liquid handling platform.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pandey, S., Takahama, M., Gruenbaum, A. et al. A whole-tissue RNA-seq toolkit for organism-wide studies of gene expression with PME-seq. Nat Protoc 15, 1459–1483 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-019-0291-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-019-0291-y

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing