Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Cerebrospinal fluid can exit into the skull bone marrow and instruct cranial hematopoiesis in mice with bacterial meningitis

Nature Neuroscience volume 25, pages 567–576 (2022)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Interactions between the immune and central nervous systems strongly influence brain health. Although the blood–brain barrier restricts this crosstalk, we now know that meningeal gateways through brain border tissues facilitate intersystem communication. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), which interfaces with the glymphatic system and thereby drains the brain’s interstitial and perivascular spaces, facilitates outward signaling beyond the blood–brain barrier. In the present study, we report that CSF can exit into the skull bone marrow. Fluorescent tracers injected into the cisterna magna of mice migrate along perivascular spaces of dural blood vessels and then travel through hundreds of sub-millimeter skull channels into the calvarial marrow. During meningitis, bacteria hijack this route to invade the skull’s hematopoietic niches and initiate cranial hematopoiesis ahead of remote tibial sites. As skull channels also directly provide leukocytes to meninges, the privileged sampling of brain-derived danger signals in CSF by regional marrow may have broad implications for inflammatory neurological disorders.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Skull channel anatomy by X-ray CT.
Fig. 2: CSF flows through the perivascular space of skull channels into the marrow.
Fig. 3: Bacterial presence in the meninges and the skull marrow.
Fig. 4: Intra- and extracellular bacterial localization in the cranial marrow.
Fig. 5: Skull channels are conduits for pneumococcal migration into the cranial marrow.
Fig. 6: Bacterial meningitis induces LSK proliferation in the skull.
Fig. 7: Summary cartoon.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The authors will make any source data within the manuscript available upon reasonable request. The large file sizes accompanying the extensive imaging data used can be provided along with relevant accessibility information for software packages associated with each file. Requests may be sent to any of the corresponding authors. Email addresses: charles_lin@hms.harvard.edu, moskowitz@helix.mgh.harvard.edu, mnahrendorf@mgh.harvard.edu.

References

  1. Ransohoff, R. M., Kivisakk, P. & Kidd, G. Three or more routes for leukocyte migration into the central nervous system. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 3, 569–581 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Engelhardt, B., Vajkoczy, P. & Weller, R. O. The movers and shapers in immune privilege of the CNS. Nat. Immunol. 18, 123–131 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gres, V., Kolter, J., Erny, D. & Henneke, P. The role of CNS macrophages in streptococcal meningoencephalitis. J. Leukoc. Biol. 106, 209–218 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Greenhalgh, A. D. et al. Peripherally derived macrophages modulate microglial function to reduce inflammation after CNS injury. PLoS Biol. 16, e2005264 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wilson, E. H., Weninger, W. & Hunter, C. A. Trafficking of immune cells in the central nervous system. J. Clin. Invest. 120, 1368–1379 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Proulx, S. T. Cerebrospinal fluid outflow: a review of the historical and contemporary evidence for arachnoid villi, perineural routes, and dural lymphatics. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 78, 2429–2457 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Plog, B. A. & Nedergaard, M. The glymphatic system in central nervous system health and disease: past, present, and future. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 13, 379–394 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Herisson, F. et al. Direct vascular channels connect skull bone marrow and the brain surface enabling myeloid cell migration. Nat. Neurosci. 21, 1209–1217 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Cai, R. et al. Panoptic imaging of transparent mice reveals whole-body neuronal projections and skull-meninges connections. Nat. Neurosci. 22, 317–327 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Brioschi, S. et al. Heterogeneity of meningeal B cells reveals a lymphopoietic niche at the CNS borders. Science 373, eabf9277 (2021).

  11. Cugurra, A. et al. Skull and vertebral bone marrow are myeloid cell reservoirs for the meninges and CNS parenchyma. Science 373, eabf7844 (2021).

  12. Lovato, L. et al. Related B cell clones populate the meninges and parenchyma of patients with multiple sclerosis. Brain 134, 534–541 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Iliff, J. J. et al. A paravascular pathway facilitates CSF flow through the brain parenchyma and the clearance of interstitial solutes, including amyloid beta. Sci. Transl. Med. 4, 147ra111 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Harling-Berg, C., Knopf, P. M., Merriam, J. & Cserr, H. F. Role of cervical lymph nodes in the systemic humoral immune response to human serum albumin microinfused into rat cerebrospinal fluid. J. Neuroimmunol. 25, 185–193 (1989).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Harris, M. G. et al. Immune privilege of the CNS is not the consequence of limited antigen sampling. Sci. Rep. 4, 4422 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Stanton, E. H. et al. Mapping of CSF transport using high spatiotemporal resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in mice: effect of anesthesia. Magn. Reson. Med. 85, 3326–3342 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Xavier, A. L. R. et al. Cannula Implantation into the cisterna magna of rodents. J. Vis. Exp. 135, 57378 (2018).

  18. Courties, G. et al. Ischemic stroke activates hematopoietic bone marrow stem cells. Circ. Res. 116, 407–417 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Vandoorne, K. et al. Imaging the vascular bone marrow niche during inflammatory stress. Circ. Res. 123, 415–427 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Mook-Kanamori, B., Geldhoff, M., Troost, D., van der Poll, T. & van de Beek, D. Characterization of a pneumococcal meningitis mouse model. BMC Infect. Dis. 12, 71 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. van de Beek, D., de Gans, J., Tunkel, A. R. & Wijdicks, E. F. Community-acquired bacterial meningitis in adults. N. Engl. J. Med. 354, 44–53 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tainaka, K. et al. Chemical landscape for tissue clearing based on hydrophilic reagents. Cell Rep. 24, 2196–2210.e9 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Guarner, J. et al. Neutrophilic bacterial meningitis: pathology and etiologic diagnosis of fatal cases. Mod. Pathol. 26, 1076–1085 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Engelen-Lee, J. Y., Koopmans, M. M., Brouwer, M. C., Aronica, E. & van de Beek, D. Histopathology of listeria meningitis. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 77, 950–957 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Rua, R. et al. Infection drives meningeal engraftment by inflammatory monocytes that impairs CNS immunity. Nat. Immunol. 20, 407–419 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Nau, R. et al. Granulocytes in the subarachnoid space of humans and rabbits with bacterial meningitis undergo apoptosis and are eliminated by macrophages. Acta Neuropathol. 96, 472–480 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Mildner, A. et al. Ly–6G+CCR2– myeloid cells rather than Ly–6ChighCCR2+ monocytes are required for the control of bacterial infection in the central nervous system. J. Immunol. 181, 2713–2722 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Djukic, M. et al. Circulating monocytes engraft in the brain, differentiate into microglia and contribute to the pathology following meningitis in mice. Brain 129, 2394–2403 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lind, N. A., Rael, V. E., Pestal, K., Liu, B. & Barton, G. M. Regulation of the nucleic acid-sensing Toll-like receptors. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 22, 224–235 (2022).

  30. Rahman, A. H. & Turka, L. A. MyD88 expression in stem cells regulates hematopoietic reconstitution following bone marrow transplantation. J. Immunol. 182, 138.16 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Weed, L. H. Studies on cerebro-spinal fluid. No. III: the pathways of escape from the subarachnoid spaces with particular reference to the arachnoid villi. J. Med Res 31, 51–91 (1914).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Louveau, A. et al. Structural and functional features of central nervous system lymphatic vessels. Nature 523, 337–341 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Aspelund, A. et al. A dural lymphatic vascular system that drains brain interstitial fluid and macromolecules. J. Exp. Med. 212, 991–999 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Hadjikhani, N. et al. Extra-axial inflammatory signal in parameninges in migraine with visual aura. Ann. Neurol. 87, 939–949 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Ringstad, G. & Eide, P. K. Molecular trans-dural efflux to skull bone marrow in humans with cerebrospinal fluid disorders. Brain https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awab388 (2021).

  36. Shechter, R. et al. Infiltrating blood-derived macrophages are vital cells playing an anti-inflammatory role in recovery from spinal cord injury in mice. PLoS Med. 6, e1000113 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Gliem, M., Schwaninger, M. & Jander, S. Protective features of peripheral monocytes/macrophages in stroke. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1862, 329–338 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Yao, H. et al. Leukaemia hijacks a neural mechanism to invade the central nervous system. Nature 560, 55–60 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kjos, M. et al. Bright fluorescent Streptococcus pneumoniae for live-cell imaging of host–pathogen interactions. J. Bacteriol. 197, 807–818 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Xu, C. et al. Stem cell factor is selectively secreted by arterial endothelial cells in bone marrow. Nat. Commun. 9, 2449 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Mestre, H., Mori, Y. & Nedergaard, M. The brain’s glymphatic system: current controversies. Trends Neurosci. 43, 458–466 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Carvalho Mda, G. et al. Evaluation and improvement of real-time PCR assays targeting lytA, ply, and psaA genes for detection of pneumococcal DNA. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45, 2460–2466 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Dutta, P. et al. Myocardial infarction activates CCR2+ hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Cell Stem Cell 16, 477–487 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Kiel, M. J. et al. SLAM family receptors distinguish hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells and reveal endothelial niches for stem cells. Cell 121, 1109–1121 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Rodriguez-Fraticelli, A. E. et al. Clonal analysis of lineage fate in native haematopoiesis. Nature 553, 212–216 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Miller, M. A. et al. Radiation therapy primes tumors for nanotherapeutic delivery via macrophage-mediated vascular bursts. Sci. Transl. Med. 9, eaal0225 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank J.-W. Veening for providing fluorescent bacteria and K. Joyes for editing the manuscript. This work was funded in part by US federal funds from the National Institutes of Health (grant nos. HL158040, HL142494, HL139598, HL125428, NS108419 and HL135752), the Global Research Lab program (grant no. NRF-2015K1A1A2028228) and the National Priority Research Center program (grant no. NRF-2021R1A6A1A03038865) of the Korean Research Foundation. M.H. was supported by an American Heart Association Career Development Award (no. 19CDA34490005).

Author information

Author notes

  1. These authors contributed equally: Fadi E. Pulous, Jean C. Cruz-Hernández.

  2. These authors jointly supervised this work: Charles P. Lin, Michael A. Moskowitz, Matthias Nahrendorf.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Systems Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

    Fadi E. Pulous, Jean C. Cruz-Hernández, Chongbo Yang, Ζeynep Kaya, Alexandre Paccalet, Gregory Wojtkiewicz, Juwell W. Wu, Maximilian J. Schloss, Claudio Vinegoni, Dmitry Richter, Masahiro Yamazoe, Maarten Hulsmans, Noor Momin, Jana Grune, David Rohde, Ralph Weissleder, Charles P. Lin, Michael A. Moskowitz & Matthias Nahrendorf

  2. Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

    Fadi E. Pulous, Chongbo Yang, Ζeynep Kaya, Alexandre Paccalet, Maximilian J. Schloss, Claudio Vinegoni, Masahiro Yamazoe, Maarten Hulsmans, Noor Momin, Jana Grune, David Rohde, Ralph Weissleder, Michael A. Moskowitz & Matthias Nahrendorf

  3. Wellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

    Jean C. Cruz-Hernández, Juwell W. Wu, Dmitry Richter & Charles P. Lin

  4. Program in Membrane Biology, Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

    Diane Capen & Dennis Brown

  5. Cardiovascular Research Institute and Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA

    Cameron S. McAlpine & Filip K. Swirski

  6. Nash Family Department of Neuroscience, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA

    Cameron S. McAlpine

  7. Department of Drug Discovery and Development, Harrison School of Pharmacy, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA

    Peter Panizzi

  8. Molecular Imaging and Neurovascular Research Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Dongguk University College of Medicine, Goyang, South Korea

    Dong-Eog Kim

  9. Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

    Michael A. Moskowitz

  10. Cardiovascular Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

    Matthias Nahrendorf

  11. Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany

    Matthias Nahrendorf

Authors
  1. Fadi E. Pulous
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jean C. Cruz-Hernández
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chongbo Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ζeynep Kaya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Alexandre Paccalet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Gregory Wojtkiewicz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Diane Capen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Dennis Brown
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Juwell W. Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Maximilian J. Schloss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Claudio Vinegoni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Dmitry Richter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Masahiro Yamazoe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Maarten Hulsmans
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Noor Momin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Jana Grune
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. David Rohde
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Cameron S. McAlpine
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Peter Panizzi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  20. Ralph Weissleder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  21. Dong-Eog Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  22. Filip K. Swirski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  23. Charles P. Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  24. Michael A. Moskowitz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  25. Matthias Nahrendorf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

F.E.P. conceived the study, designed, performed and analyzed imaging and wet lab experiments, induced meningitis, interpreted data and created the figures. J.C.C.-H. designed, performed and analyzed imaging experiments. C.Y. and Z.K. optimized the meningitis model for imaging assays, performed and analyzed experiments, interpreted data and discussed strategy. A.P., M.H., N.M., G.W., D.C., M.Y, J.G., M.J.S. and D. Rohde performed experiments and collected data. C.V. participated in optical clearing and imaging experiments. D. Richter and J.W.W. provided image analysis. D.B., C.V., D.E.K., F.K.S. and R.W. discussed data and experimental design. F.E.P. and M.N. wrote the manuscript with input from all authors. C.L., M.A.M. and M.N. conceived and directed the study.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Charles P. Lin, Michael A. Moskowitz or Matthias Nahrendorf.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

M.N. has received funds or material research support from Lilly, Alnylam, Biotronik, CSL Behring, GlycoMimetics, GSK, Medtronic, Novartis and Pfizer, as well as consulting fees from Biogen, Gimv, IFM Therapeutics, Molecular Imaging, Sigilon, NovoNordisk and Verseau Therapeutics. The other authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Neuroscience thanks Sandrine Bourdoulous, Michal Schwartz, Hiroki Ueda, and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 CSF tracer outflow in occipital, parietal and frontal skull bones.

a, Experimental outline. Ex-vivo z-stack (54 μm stack at 1 μm/step) of occipital, parietal and frontal skull cortex after IC and IV injection of fluorescently labeled dextran. Bone is visualized by second harmonic generation around channels b, Imaging of CSF tracer outflow through channels in different skull bones, assessed in n=2 mice. Bar graphs depict the proportion of skull channels that were positive for CSF tracer.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Dynamics of CSF outflow into bone marrow.

a, Ex vivo imaging of whole-mount skull 10 min after intracisternal (IC) injection of ovalbumin. Intravenous(IV) injection of CD31/Sca1 labeled vasculature and IV osteosense the bone. b, Ex vivo imaging of tibia 10 minutes after intracisternal injection of ovalbumin. c, Imaging 30 minutes after intracisternal injection of ovalbumin. Data is representative of 2 independent experiments.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Inflammation in the meninges driven by bacterial meningitis.

qPCR analysis of meninges isolated from either sham controls that were intracisternally injected with artificial CSF or mice 48 hours after intracisternal infection for relative expression analysis of a, Il1β, b, Il6 and c, Tnfα (mean ± SD; n=6 mice per group; P values represent an unpaired two-tailed t-test from a single experiment). d, Raw images obtained by whole mount ex vivo imaging of the skull 48 hours after intracranial sham or S. pneumoniae injection. First representative image is the original data from Fig. 5b while the second set represents additional examples of channel morphology and bacterial propagation. Green arrow highlights bacteria (scale: 50 and 25 μm).

Extended Data Fig. 4 Analysis of skull hematopoietic progenitors during meningitis.

a, Experimental outline for calvarial hematopoietic progenitor analysis. b, Flow cytometry gating. c, Quantitation of calvarial BrdU+ common myeloid progenitors (CMP) 6 hours after intracisternal sham or S. pneumococci injection. (n=11 sham and 12 meningitis, P value represents an unpaired, two-tailed t-test). d, Quantitation of calvarial BrdU+ CMP 24 hours after intracisternal sham or S. pneumococci injection. (n=6 mice per group, P value represents an unpaired, two-tailed t-test) e, Quantitation of calvarial BrdU+ LSK 24 hours after intracisternal sham or S. pneumococci injection. (n=6 mice per group, P value represents an unpaired, two-tailed t-test).

Extended Data Fig. 5 Analysis of calvarial leukocytes during meningitis.

a, Experimental outline of calvarial leukocyte analysis. b, Flow cytometry gating. c-f, Quantitation of calvarial leukocytes 6 hours after intracisternal S. pneumococci injection shows neutrophils, monocyte subsets and total lymphocytes (n=5 mice per group). g-j, Quantitation of calvarial leukocytes 12 hours after S. pneumococci injection including neutrophils (g), Ly6Chi monocytes (h), Ly6Clo monocytes (i) and total lymphocytes (j) (n=9 sham and 8 meningitis). k-n, Quantitation of calvarial leukocytes 24 hours after S. pneumococci injection including neutrophils (k), Ly6Chi monocytes (l), Ly6Clo monocytes (m) and total lymphocytes (n) (n=6 mice per group). (P values represent unpaired, two-tailed t-tests, data are mean values ± SD).

Extended Data Fig. 6 Meningeal leukocytes expand in bacterial meningitis.

a, Experimental outline. b, flow cytometry plots of control meninges (upper panel) and meninges 48 hours after infection. c, quantification of CD11b+ myeloid cells and d, Ly6G+ neutrophils in meninges (n=4 sham and 7 meningitis mice, P values represent unpaired, two-sided t tests, data are mean values ± SD).

Extended Data Fig. 7 Tracking of skull leukocytes to infected meninges.

a, Experimental outline indicating skull marrow transplantation, followed by induction of meningitis 4 weeks later. b, flow plots and (c) quantitation of myeloid cell chimerism in irradiated skull versus lead-shielded tibia 4 weeks after transplantation (n=7 recipient mice, P value represents unpaired, two-tailed t test, data are mean values ± SD). d, flow plots and (e) quantification of myeloid cell chimerism in the meninges and in blood (n=7 recipient mice, P value represents unpaired, two-tailed t tests, data are mean values ± SD).

Extended Data Fig. 8 Myd88-related sensing in the skull marrow.

a, Experimental groups include wild type and Myd88−/− mice. The skull marrow was assessed by flow cytometric staining for lineage markers Sca-1 and c-kit. b, Flow cytometry plots and c, quantitation of LSK % as a total of all live lineage negative single cells in the calvarial marrow of steady-state Myd88−/− or wild-type C57/Bl6 mice (n=9 sham and 6 meningitis mice, P value represents an unpaired, two-tailed t-test, data are mean values ± SD). d, Experimental outline. Non-irradiated wild type recipient mice received a mix of 40,000 LSK from wild type donors (labeled with the membrane dye DiD) and from Myd88-/- donors (labeled with Dil). e, Flow cytometry gating and f, analysis of the skull bone marrow 3 days later showed a similar seeding of LSK irrespective of phenotype (n=4 mice per group, unpaired, two-tailed t-test).g, Experimental outline of calvarial progenitor analysis in Myd88−/− mice with and without meningitis. h, Flow cytometry gating. i, Quantitation of calvarial BrdU+ CMP 12 hours after intracisternal sham or S. pneumococci injection. (n=11 sham and 12 meningitis mice per group, unpaired two-tailed t-test, data are mean values ± SD). j, Quantitation of calvarial BrdU+ LSK 24 hours after intracisternal sham or S. pneumococci injection. (n=6 mice group, unpaired two-tailed t-test, data are mean values ± SD).

Supplementary information

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Video 1

IVM of perivascular CSF tracer flow along a dural vessel. Intravenously injected dextran is shown in red, IC injected ovalbumin in green. Video depicts step-wise progression through a 127-μm z-stack acquired at 1 μm per slice.

Supplementary Video 2

Ex vivo acquired z-stack of the internal skull cortex showing the CSF tracer (IC injected dextran, green) traveling along channel vessels (intravenously injected dextran, red) into the marrow.

Supplementary Video 3

A 3D rendering of an optically cleared skull–brain specimen highlighting channels in a sham control mouse. Vasculature was labeled with intravenously injected CD31/Sca-1 antibodies and bone with osteosense.

Supplementary Video 4

A 3D rendering of an optically cleared skull–brain specimen from a mouse with meningitis 48 h after intracisternal injection of GFP+ S. pneumoniae showing bacterial propagation (green) in the subarachnoid space adjacent to skull channels.

Supplementary Video 5

A 3D rendering of a maximal intensity projection acquired by IVM of skull marrow in a sham control mouse.

Supplementary Video 6

A 3D rendering of a maximal intensity projection acquired by IVM of skull marrow-containing GFP+ S. pneumoniae (green) in a mouse with meningitis.

Supplementary Video 7

A 3D rendering of skull channels in a sham control mouse. Vasculature was labeled with intravenous injection of CD31/Sca1 antibodies and bone with osteosense.

Supplementary Video 8

A 3D rendering of a skull channel in a mouse with meningitis showing GFP+ S. pneumoniae (green) inside the channel. Vasculature was labeled with intravenous injection of CD31/Sca1 antibodies and bone with osteosense.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pulous, F.E., Cruz-Hernández, J.C., Yang, C. et al. Cerebrospinal fluid can exit into the skull bone marrow and instruct cranial hematopoiesis in mice with bacterial meningitis. Nat Neurosci 25, 567–576 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-022-01060-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-022-01060-2

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing