Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Tetracenomycin X sequesters peptidyl-tRNA during translation of QK motifs

Abstract

As antimicrobial resistance threatens our ability to treat common bacterial infections, new antibiotics with limited cross-resistance are urgently needed. In this regard, natural products that target the bacterial ribosome have the potential to be developed into potent drugs through structure-guided design, provided their mechanisms of action are well understood. Here we use inverse toeprinting coupled to next-generation sequencing to show that the aromatic polyketide tetracenomycin X primarily inhibits peptide bond formation between an incoming aminoacyl-tRNA and a terminal Gln-Lys (QK) motif in the nascent polypeptide. Using cryogenic electron microscopy, we reveal that translation inhibition at QK motifs occurs via an unusual mechanism involving sequestration of the 3′ adenosine of peptidyl-tRNALys in the drug-occupied nascent polypeptide exit tunnel of the ribosome. Our study provides mechanistic insights into the mode of action of tetracenomycin X on the bacterial ribosome and suggests a path forward for the development of novel aromatic polyketide antibiotics.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: iTP-seq analysis of the context dependence of ribosome inhibition by TcmX.
Fig. 2: In vitro and in vivo validation of context-dependent ribosome stalling induced by TcmX.
Fig. 3: Cryo-EM structure of a 70S–MAAAPQKC–TcmX complex.
Fig. 4: Mechanism of TcmX-dependent translation inhibition at QK motifs.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Cryo-EM maps of the 70S–MAAAPQKC–TcmX complex and the associated molecular models have been deposited in the Electron Microscopy Data Bank and Protein Data Bank, with the accession codes EMD-14956 and PDB 7ZTA, respectively. The original micrograph movies have been deposited in the Electron Microscopy Public Image Archive under accession code EMPIAR-11241. Sequencing data for the iTP-seq experiment have been deposited as a National Center for Biotechnology Information BioProject with the accession code PRJNA838796. Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

Scripts used to process iTP-seq data were deposited on GitHub (https://github.com/innislab/ITP-seq).

References

  1. Huang, C. et al. Marine bacterial aromatic polyketides from host-dependent heterologous expression and fungal mode of cyclization. Front. Chem. 6, 528 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Katz, L. & Baltz, R. H. Natural product discovery: past, present, and future. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 43, 155–176 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang, J. et al. Biosynthesis of aromatic polyketides in microorganisms using type II polyketide synthases. Microb. Cell Fact. 19, 110 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang, Z., Pan, H.-X. & Tang, G.-L. New insights into bacterial type II polyketide biosynthesis. F1000Res. 6, 172 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu, B. et al. [Identification of tetracenomycin X from a marine-derived Saccharothrix sp. guided by genes sequence analysis].Yao Xue Xue Bao 49, 230–236 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Osterman, I. A. et al. Tetracenomycin X inhibits translation by binding within the ribosomal exit tunnel. Nat. Chem. Biol. 16, 1071–1077 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Qiao, X. et al. Tetracenomycin X exerts antitumour activity in lung cancer cells through the downregulation of cyclin D1. Mar. Drugs 17, 63 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Jenner, L. et al. Structural basis for potent inhibitory activity of the antibiotic tigecycline during protein synthesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 3812–3816 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Kannan, K. et al. The general mode of translation inhibition by macrolide antibiotics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 15958–15963 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Davis, A. R., Gohara, D. W. & Yap, M.-N. F. Sequence selectivity of macrolide-induced translational attenuation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 15379–15384 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Seip, B., Sacheau, G., Dupuy, D. & Innis, C. A. Ribosomal stalling landscapes revealed by high-throughput inverse toeprinting of mRNA libraries. Life Sci. Alliance 1, e201800148 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Shimizu, Y. et al. Cell-free translation reconstituted with purified components. Nat. Biotechnol. 19, 751–755 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Starosta, A. L. et al. Translational stalling at polyproline stretches is modulated by the sequence context upstream of the stall site. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 10711–10719 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Hartz, D., McPheeters, D. S., Traut, R. & Gold, L. Extension inhibition analysis of translation initiation complexes. Methods Enzymol. 164, 419–425 (1988).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Orelle, C. et al. Tools for characterizing bacterial protein synthesis inhibitors. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 57, 5994–6004 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Bailey, M., Chettiath, T. & Mankin, A. S. Induction of erm(C) expression by noninducing antibiotics. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52, 866–874 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Horinouchi, S. & Weisblum, B. Posttranscriptional modification of mRNA conformation: mechanism that regulates erythromycin-induced resistance. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 77, 7079–7083 (1980).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Shivakumar, A. G., Hahn, J., Grandi, G., Kozlov, Y. & Dubnau, D. Posttranscriptional regulation of an erythromycin resistance protein specified by plasmic pE194. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 77, 3903–3907 (1980).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Vazquez-Laslop, N., Thum, C. & Mankin, A. S. Molecular mechanism of drug-dependent ribosome stalling. Mol. Cell 30, 190–202 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gupta, P., Kannan, K., Mankin, A. S. & Vázquez-Laslop, N. Regulation of gene expression by macrolide-induced ribosomal frameshifting. Mol. Cell 52, 629–642 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Schmeing, T. M., Huang, K. S., Strobel, S. A. & Steitz, T. A. An induced-fit mechanism to promote peptide bond formation and exclude hydrolysis of peptidyl-tRNA. Nature 438, 520–524 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Polikanov, Y. S., Steitz, T. A. & Innis, C. A. A proton wire to couple aminoacyl-tRNA accommodation and peptide bond formation on the ribosome. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 21, 787–793 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Svidritskiy, E. & Korostelev, A. A. Mechanism of inhibition of translation termination by blasticidin S. J. Mol. Biol. 430, 591–593 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Svidritskiy, E., Ling, C., Ermolenko, D. N. & Korostelev, A. A. Blasticidin S inhibits translation by trapping deformed tRNA on the ribosome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 12283–12288 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Polikanov, Y. S. et al. Distinct tRNA accommodation intermediates observed on the ribosome with the antibiotics hygromycin A and A201A. Mol. Cell 58, 832–844 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Vázquez-Laslop, N. & Mankin, A. S. How macrolide antibiotics work. Trends Biochem. Sci. 43, 668–684 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Beckert, B. et al. Structural and mechanistic basis for translation inhibition by macrolide and ketolide antibiotics. Nat. Commun. 12, 4466 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Anderson, M. G., Khoo, C. L.-Y. & Rickards, R. W. Oxidation processes in the biosynthesis of the tetracenomycin and elloramycin antibiotics. J. Antibiot. (Tokyo) 42, 640–643 (1989).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Drautz, H., Reuschenbach, P., Zähner, H., Rohr, J. & Zeeck, A. Metabolic products of microorganisms. 225. Elloramycin, a new anthracycline-like antibiotic from Streptomyces olivaceus. Isolation, characterization, structure and biological properties. J. Antibiot. (Tokyo) 38, 1291–1301 (1985).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Egert, E., Noltemeyer, M., Siebers, J., Rohr, J. & Zeeck, A. The structure of tetracenomycin C. J. Antibiot. (Tokyo) 45, 1190–1192 (1992).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Rohr, J. & Zeeck, A. Structure-activity relationships of elloramycin and tetracenomycin C. J. Antibiot. (Tokyo) 43, 1169–1178 (1990).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Weber, W., Zähner, H., Siebers, J., Schröder, K. & Zeeck, A. [Metabolic products of microorganisms. 175. Tetracenomycin C (author’s transl)]. Arch. Microbiol. 121, 111–116 (1979).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Guillerez, J., Lopez, P. J., Proux, F., Launay, H. & Dreyfus, M. A mutation in T7 RNA polymerase that facilitates promoter clearance. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 5958–5963 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhang, J., Kobert, K., Flouri, T. & Stamatakis, A. PEAR: a fast and accurate Illumina Paired-End reAd mergeR. Bioinformatics 30, 614–620 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Hunter, J. D. Matplotlib: a 2D graphics environment. Comput. Sci. Eng. 9, 90–95 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Tareen, A. & Kinney, J. B. Logomaker: beautiful sequence logos in Python. Bioinformatics 36, 2272–2274 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Tikhonova, E. B. & Zgurskaya, H. I. AcrA, AcrB, and TolC of Escherichia coli form a stable intermembrane multidrug efflux complex. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 32116–32124 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Weston, N., Sharma, P., Ricci, V. & Piddock, L. J. V. Regulation of the AcrAB-TolC efflux pump in Enterobacteriaceae. Res. Microbiol. 169, 425–431 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Mastronarde, D. N. Automated electron microscope tomography using robust prediction of specimen movements. J. Struct. Biol. 152, 36–51 (2005).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Kimanius, D., Dong, L., Sharov, G., Nakane, T. & Scheres, S. H. W. New tools for automated cryo-EM single-particle analysis in RELION-4.0. Biochem. J. 478, 4169–4185 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Zheng, S. Q. et al. MotionCor2: anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy. Nat. Methods 14, 331–332 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Rohou, A. & Grigorieff, N. CTFFIND4: fast and accurate defocus estimation from electron micrographs. J. Struct. Biol. 192, 216–221 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF Chimera—a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605–1612 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Terwilliger, T. C., Sobolev, O. V., Afonine, P. V. & Adams, P. D. Automated map sharpening by maximization of detail and connectivity. Acta Crystallogr. D Struct. Biol. 74, 545–559 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D 60, 2126–2132 (2004).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Croll, T. I. ISOLDE: a physically realistic environment for model building into low-resolution electron-density maps. Acta Crystallogr. D Struct. Biol. 74, 519–530 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Adams, P. D. et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 213–221 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF ChimeraX: structure visualization for researchers, educators, and developers. Protein Sci. 30, 70–82 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank I. Osterman and D. Wilson for providing TcmX, N. Vázquez-Laslop for providing the JM109 ΔacrA/acrB E. coli strain, A. Malhotra for providing RNase R and S. Blanchard for his comments on an early draft of the paper. We also thank A. Labécot for preliminary experiments. E.C.L. and C.A.I. have received funding for this project from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (grant agreement no. 724040). C.A.I. is an EMBO YIP (project no. 3869) and has received funding from the Fondation Bettencourt-Schueller. C.A.I. and T.N.P. have received funding for this project from the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) under the frame of the Joint JPI-EC-AMR Project ‘Ribotarget – Development of novel ribosome-targeting antibiotics’ (grant no. ANR-18-JAM2-0005-02 RIBOTARGET). We thank the cryo-EM facility of the Institut Européen de Chimie et Biologie (Pessac, France) for the data collection time on the Talos Arctica microscope.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

C.A.I. designed the study. E.C.L. performed iTP-seq and toeprinting experiments. E.C.L. and T.T.R. processed and analyzed the iTP-seq data. T.N.P. and T.T.R. performed the blue ring assays. E.C.L. prepared complexes for cryo-EM. T.N.P. prepared grids and performed cryo-EM data collection. T.N.P. and C.A.I. processed the cryo-EM data, and E.C.L. and C.A.I. built the model. E.C.L., T.N.P., T.T.R. and C.A.I. wrote the paper.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Thibaud T. Renault or C. Axel Innis.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Chemical Biology thanks Marina Rodnina, Yury Polikanov and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Size distribution of inverse toeprints and diversity of the (NNN)15 library.

a, Number of deep sequencing reads obtained for inverse toeprints of different lengths, plotted as a function of the distance between the start codon and the RNase R cleavage site. Average read numbers for three independent replicates are shown for TcmX-treated (orange) and untreated (blue) samples. Inverse toeprints within a size range featuring a well-defined three-nucleotide periodicity were retained for further analysis (gray area). The iTP-seq experiment consisted of 3 independent replicates for the TcmX-treated condition (2.8 × 106, 2.5 × 106 and 2.3 × 106 reads), and 3 replicates for the untreated condition (2.7 × 106, 2.3 × 106 and 2.6 × 106 reads). On average ~2.5 × 106 reads were obtained per replicate. The error bands show the 95% confidence interval of the mean of the three replicates. b. Nucleotide frequency of the raw reads for the (NNN)15 library, showing a relatively equal proportion of each dNTP for codons 2–15.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Enrichment of two-amino acid motifs in samples treated with TcmX.

Heatmaps showing the enrichment of individual residues at positions −2 to +1, and all possible combinations of motifs consisting of two adjacent amino acids, following treatment with TcmX. Enrichment is defined as log2(FTcmX/Funtreated), where FTcmX is the frequency of occurrence of a given motif in the sample treated with TcmX and Funtreated is its frequency in the untreated sample.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Four-amino acid motifs at position [−2,+1] ending with LK are not significantly enriched following TcmX treatment.

Volcano plot of statistical significance (−log10(p-value)) against enrichment (log2(fold change)) for four-amino acid motifs at position [−2,+1]. Motifs ending in LK are shown in yellow and the two LK-containing motifs described in Ref. 6 (FVLK/TILK) are labeled in bold. P-values were calculated by DESeq2 (Ref. 33) using a one-sided Wald test, without correction for multiple-testing.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 4 Ability of different PQKC variants to induce TcmX-dependent stalling.

Volcano plots of statistical significance (−log10(p-value)) against enrichment (log2(fold change)) for four-amino acid motifs at position [−2,+1]. Single amino acid variants of the PQKC motif are shown in red, XQKX motifs are in blue, PQXC or PXKC motifs are in orange and PXXC motifs are in yellow. P-values were calculated by DESeq2 (Ref. 33) using a one-sided Wald test, without correction for multiple-testing.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 5 Codon composition does not have a major influence on TcmX-dependent ribosome stalling at QK motifs.

Violin plot showing the enrichment of various three-amino acid motifs at positions [−2,0] following treatment with TcmX. Each bar represents a motif variant with a distinct codon composition.

Extended Data Fig. 6 Overview of cryo-EM data processing.

Flowchart showing the workflow used to process cryo-EM data for the 70S–MAAAPQKC–TcmX complex in Relion v4.0 (ref. 41). The final reconstruction could be refined to an overall resolution of 2.7 Å, assessed using a Fourier shell correlation (FSC) cutoff of 0.143.

Extended Data Fig. 7 Quality of the 70S–MAAAPQKC–TcmX reconstruction.

a, Cryo-EM density map obtained for a 3D reconstruction of the 70S–MAAAPQKC–TcmX complex in Relion v4.0 (ref. 41) and auto-sharpened with Phenix v1.20.1 (ref. 45), filtered and colored by local resolution estimation values in Chimera X v.1.3 (ref. 49). b, Cross-section of the same map showing the E, P and A sites of the ribosome. c, Isolated ligand densities in the E, P and A sites, filtered and colored by local resolution. d, The same isolated densities shown in c, displayed as a transparent surface and fitted with molecular models of the E-, P- and A-site tRNAs, mRNA, TcmX and the nascent peptide. e, Model to map correlation curve calculated for the 70S–MAAAPQKC–TcmX structure. f, Representative cryo-EM densities of three different tRNA modifications within the A- and P-site tRNAs.

Extended Data Fig. 8 Comparison of 70S–MAAAPQKC–TcmX with earlier structures of the ribosome in complex with TcmX or other antibiotics.

a,b, Structural comparison of the peptidyl transferase center and TcmX binding site in 70S–MAAAPQKC–TcmX (white) and in complexes between E. coli 70S (gray, PBD 6Y69) or human 80 S (pale green, PDB 6Y6X) ribosomes and TcmX (Ref. 6). c, d, Displacement of the 3’ end of peptidyl-tRNA (dark blue) by TcmX (c) or Blasticidin S (PDB 6B4V, Ref. 23). e, f, Displacement of the 3’ end of aminoacyl-tRNA (light blue) by (e) Hygromycin A (PDB 5DOY, Ref. 25) or (f) A201A (PDB 4Z3S, Ref. 25).

Extended Data Fig. 9 Effect of TcmX on the accommodation of the 3’ end of aminoacyl-tRNA, on 23S rRNA residue 2602 and on the N-terminus of ribosomal protein bL27.

ad, Structural comparison of 23S rRNA nucleotides and tRNAs within the A site (a, b) and P site (c, d) regions of the peptidyl transferase center in the uninduced (Ref. 21) and induced (pre-attack) (Ref. 22) states (PDB 1VQ6 and 1VY4, respectively) (a, c), and the uninduced and TcmX-inhibited states (b, d). In the 70S–MAAAPQKC–TcmX structure, 23S rRNA residues U2506, G2583 and U2584 are in their induced conformation, but 23S rRNA nucleotide U2585 and nucleotide A76 of the P-site tRNA remain in the uninduced conformation, indicating partial aminoacyl-tRNA accommodation into the peptidyl transferase center. e, Sequestration of residue A76 of the P-site tRNALys within the tunnel by TcmX causes the preceding residue C75 to shift, which in turn leads to a conformational change in the peptidyl transferase center resulting in the stacking of the base of 23S rRNA residue A2602 against the imidazole ring of residue His-3 of ribosomal protein bL27.

Extended Data Fig. 10 Possible way forward for the design of TcmX derivatives with increased specificity for the bacterial ribosome.

a, The O-methyl group attached to the D ring of TcmX could be used as a starting point to ‘grow’ the drug molecule towards a cavity lined with the backbone phosphate groups of 23S rRNA residues G2582 and G2608 in the E. coli ribosome (white). b, TcmX derivatives with suitable side chains attached to this position may retain activity against the bacterial ribosome while no longer binding to the human ribosome (pale green, PDB 6Y6X), where this cavity is blocked by 28S rRNA residue U1591.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Tables 1 and 2.

Reporting Summary

Source data

Source Data Fig. 1 and Extended Data Figs. 3 and 4

Statistical source data for Fig. 1 and Extended Data Figs. 3 and 4.

Source Data Fig. 2

Uncropped toeprinting gel and agar plates.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Leroy, E.C., Perry, T.N., Renault, T.T. et al. Tetracenomycin X sequesters peptidyl-tRNA during translation of QK motifs. Nat Chem Biol 19, 1091–1096 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41589-023-01343-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41589-023-01343-0

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing