Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

A molecular switch for neuroprotective astrocyte reactivity

Abstract

The intrinsic mechanisms that regulate neurotoxic versus neuroprotective astrocyte phenotypes and their effects on central nervous system degeneration and repair remain poorly understood. Here we show that injured white matter astrocytes differentiate into two distinct C3-positive and C3-negative reactive populations, previously simplified as neurotoxic (A1) and neuroprotective (A2)1,2, which can be further subdivided into unique subpopulations defined by proliferation and differential gene expression signatures. We find the balance of neurotoxic versus neuroprotective astrocytes is regulated by discrete pools of compartmented cyclic adenosine monophosphate derived from soluble adenylyl cyclase and show that proliferating neuroprotective astrocytes inhibit microglial activation and downstream neurotoxic astrocyte differentiation to promote retinal ganglion cell survival. Finally, we report a new, therapeutically tractable viral vector to specifically target optic nerve head astrocytes and show that raising nuclear or depleting cytoplasmic cyclic AMP in reactive astrocytes inhibits deleterious microglial or macrophage cell activation and promotes retinal ganglion cell survival after optic nerve injury. Thus, soluble adenylyl cyclase and compartmented, nuclear- and cytoplasmic-localized cyclic adenosine monophosphate in reactive astrocytes act as a molecular switch for neuroprotective astrocyte reactivity that can be targeted to inhibit microglial activation and neurotoxic astrocyte differentiation to therapeutic effect. These data expand on and define new reactive astrocyte subtypes and represent a step towards the development of gliotherapeutics for the treatment of glaucoma and other optic neuropathies.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: scRNA-seq shows several reactive astrocyte populations in injured optic nerves.
Fig. 2: Soluble adenylyl cyclase regulates astrocyte proliferation.
Fig. 3: Soluble adenylyl cyclase promotes neuroprotective astrocyte proliferation and RGC survival after optic nerve crush injury.
Fig. 4: Soluble adenylyl cyclase inhibits neurotoxic astrocyte differentiation.
Fig. 5: Distinct subcellular pools of cAMP differentially regulate astrocyte proliferation in vitro.
Fig. 6: Compartmented cAMP in ONH astrocytes differentially regulates microglial activation and RGC survival after optic nerve injury.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data are available in the manuscript, Supplementary Information and online. Bulk and scRNA-seq data can be found at the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus through accession numbers GSE245816 and GSE237675Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

Cell Ranger can be found at http://10xgenomics.com/support/software/cell-ranger/downloads. All analysis packages can be found at http://bioconductor.org and original R package repository at http://cran.r-project.org.

References

  1. Zamanian, J. L. et al. Genomic analysis of reactive astrogliosis. J. Neurosci. 32, 6391–6410 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Liddelow, S. A. et al. Neurotoxic reactive astrocytes are induced by activated microglia. Nature 541, 481–487 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Burda, J. E. & Sofroniew, M. V. Reactive gliosis and the multicellular response to CNS damage and disease. Neuron 81, 229–248 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Guttenplan, K. A. et al. Neurotoxic reactive astrocytes drive neuronal death after retinal injury. Cell Rep. 31, 107776 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Anderson, M. A. et al. Required growth facilitators propel axon regeneration across complete spinal cord injury. Nature 561, 396–400 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Escartin, C. et al. Reactive astrocyte nomenclature, definitions and future directions. Nat. Neurosci. 24, 312–325 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Wanner, I. B. et al. Glial scar borders are formed by newly proliferated, elongated astrocytes that interact to corral inflammatory and fibrotic cells via STAT3-dependent mechanisms after spinal cord injury. J. Neurosci. 33, 12870–12886 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Anderson, M. A. et al. Astrocyte scar formation aids central nervous system axon regeneration. Nature 532, 195–200 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Herrmann, J. E. et al. STAT3 is a critical regulator of astrogliosis and scar formation after spinal cord injury. J. Neurosci. 28, 7231–7243 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Choi, H. B. et al. Metabolic communication between astrocytes and neurons via bicarbonate-responsive soluble adenylyl cyclase. Neuron 75, 1094–1104 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Shim, M. S. et al. Elevated intracellular cAMP exacerbates vulnerability to oxidative stress in optic nerve head astrocytes. Cell Death Dis. 9, 285 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Paco, S., Hummel, M., Pla, V., Sumoy, L. & Aguado, F. Cyclic AMP signaling restricts activation and promotes maturation and antioxidant defenses in astrocytes. BMC Genomics 17, 304 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Averaimo, S. et al. A plasma membrane microdomain compartmentalizes ephrin-generated cAMP signals to prune developing retinal axon arbors. Nat. Commun. 7, 12896 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Goldberg, J. L. et al. Retinal ganglion cells do not extend axons by default: promotion by neurotrophic signaling and electrical activity. Neuron 33, 689–702 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cameron, E. G. & Kapiloff, M. S. Intracellular compartmentation of cAMP promotes neuroprotection and regeneration of CNS neurons. Neural Regen. Res. 12, 201–202 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Boczek, T. et al. Regulation of neuronal survival and axon growth by a perinuclear cAMP compartment. J. Neurosci. 39, 5466–5480 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Corredor, R. G. et al. Soluble adenylyl cyclase activity is necessary for retinal ganglion cell survival and axon growth. J. Neurosci. 32, 7734–7744 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Lein, E. S. et al. Genome-wide atlas of gene expression in the adult mouse brain. Nature 445, 168–176 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen, E. Y. et al. Enrichr: interactive and collaborative HTml5 gene list enrichment analysis tool. BMC Bioinf. 14, 128 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang, Y. et al. Purification and characterization of progenitor and mature human astrocytes reveals transcriptional and functional differences with mouse. Neuron 89, 37–53 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sun, W. et al. SOX9 is an astrocyte-specific nuclear marker in the adult brain outside the neurogenic regions. J. Neurosci. 37, 4493–4507 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Kettenmann, H. & Ransom, B. R. Neuroglia (Oxford Univ. Press, 2013).

  23. Leung, J. Y. et al. Metallothionein promotes regenerative axonal sprouting of dorsal root ganglion neurons after physical axotomy. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 69, 809–817 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Malik, V. A. et al. GDF15 promotes simultaneous astrocyte remodeling and tight junction strengthening at the blood–brain barrier. J. Neurosci. Res. 98, 1433–1456 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Jiwaji, Z. et al. Reactive astrocytes acquire neuroprotective as well as deleterious signatures in response to Tau and Ass pathology. Nat. Commun. 13, 135 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Takeuchi, H. et al. VGF nerve growth factor inducible is involved in retinal ganglion cells death induced by optic nerve crush. Sci. Rep. 8, 16443 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Burda, J. E. et al. Divergent transcriptional regulation of astrocyte reactivity across disorders. Nature 606, 557–564 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Chen, J., Martinez, J., Milner, T. A., Buck, J. & Levin, L. R. Neuronal expression of soluble adenylyl cyclase in the mammalian brain. Brain Res. 1518, 1–8 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Gire, V. & Dulic, V. Senescence from G2 arrest, revisited. Cell Cycle 14, 297–304 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Zippin, J. H. et al. Compartmentalization of bicarbonate-sensitive adenylyl cyclase in distinct signaling microdomains. FASEB J. 17, 82–84 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lefkimmiatis, K., Moyer, M. P., Curci, S. & Hofer, A. M. “cAMP sponge”: a buffer for cyclic adenosine 3', 5'-monophosphate. PLoS ONE 4, e7649 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. O'Carroll, S. J., Cook, W. H. & Young, D. AAV targeting of glial cell types in the central and peripheral nervous system and relevance to human gene therapy. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 13, 618020 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hasel, P., Rose, I. V. L., Sadick, J. S., Kim, R. D. & Liddelow, S. A. Neuroinflammatory astrocyte subtypes in the mouse brain. Nat. Neurosci. 24, 1475–1487 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Patani, R., Hardingham, G. E. & Liddelow, S. A. Functional roles of reactive astrocytes in neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 19, 395–409 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Wang, R., Seifert, P. & Jakobs, T. C. Astrocytes in the optic nerve head of glaucomatous mice display a characteristic reactive phenotype. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 58, 924–932 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Quillen, S. et al. Astrocyte responses to experimental glaucoma in mouse optic nerve head. PLoS ONE 15, e0238104 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Lozano, D. C., Choe, T. E., Cepurna, W. O., Morrison, J. C. & Johnson, E. C. Early optic nerve head glial proliferation and Jak-Stat pathway activation in chronic experimental glaucoma. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 60, 921–932 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Cameron, E. G. et al. Optic nerve crush in mice to study retinal ganglion cell survival and regeneration. Bio. Protoc. https://doi.org/10.21769/BioProtoc.3559 (2020).

  39. Schildge, S., Bohrer, C., Beck, K. & Schachtrup, C. Isolation and culture of mouse cortical astrocytes. J. Vis. Exp. https://doi.org/10.3791/50079 (2013).

  40. Ho, A. et al. Genetic analysis of Mint/X11 proteins: essential presynaptic functions of a neuronal adaptor protein family. J. Neurosci. 26, 13089–13101 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by National Eye Institute grants R01-EY026766, R01-EY032416 (M.S.K. and J.L.G.), F32-EY025915 (E.G.C.), T32-EY027816 (A.B.T.), P30-EY026877 (J.L.G.), Medical Technology Enterprise Consortium, the Gilbert Family Foundation Vision Restoration Initiative and an unrestricted grant from Research to Prevent Blindness. We also thank the Stanford Gene Vector and Virus Core (GVVC) and the Stanford Genetics Bioinformatics Service Center for their critical contributions to this work. Illustrations created with BioRender.com.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

E.G.C. and J.L.G. conceived the project, designed the experiments, interpreted the data and wrote the paper. E.G.C., M.N., A.B.T., L.H., B.T., W.Y. and P.N. performed RNA-seq experiments and analyses. M.N., E.G.C., S.H., C.D. and T.L.S. performed cell culture assays and associated analyses. E.G.C., M.N., A.B.T. and S.S. performed western blots, qPCR and analyses. E.G.C., A.B.T., J.G., M.N., R.D., X.X., S.H., C.K., M. Atkins, C.S. and M. Ashouri performed in vivo work and associated analyses. M.B. and K.C.C. validated and provided reagents. K.R.R. performed mouse husbandry and genotyping. M.S.K. and R.V.N. contributed to experimental oversite and provided editorial feedback. M.B.W. and B.T. assisted with figure design and illustrations. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Evan G. Cameron or Jeffrey L. Goldberg.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Stanford University has prepared provisional patent applications (file numbers pending) based on the ONH astrocyte-specific viral vector and the manipulation of astrocyte cAMP, on which E.G.C., A.B.T. and J.L.G. are included as inventors.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature thanks Xin Duan and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Fig. 1 Annotation and cell cycle profiles of optic nerve cell types shown in Fig. 1.

a. Dot plots of canonical cellular markers in 13 identified optic nerve cell types. Fraction of expressing cells shown as dot size and mean expression shown as dot colour. b. UMAP plots as in Fig. 1e showing all optic nerve cell clusters coloured by distribution of cells in G1, S and G2/M phase.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Characterization of sAC expression and function in primary cortical astrocytes.

a-b. Astrocyte marker immunostaining and characterization of primary cortical astrocyte culture purity (n = 4 cultures). Scale bars are 50 µm. c. Western blots showing sACfull (180 kDa) and sACt (50 kDa) protein expression in sACfl/fl mouse astrocytes after 15 days in vitro (DIV), 30DIV and following AAV2-GFP (Ctrl) or AAV2-Cre-GFP (KO) transduction. d. Quantification of sAC KO determined by the relative difference of sACt band intensity between CTRL and sAC KO samples with protein expression normalized to ponceau or GAPDH (n = 3 cultures). Two-tailed paired t-test. e. Illustration of cell cycle phase progression and canonical checkpoints located at the G1, G2/M and metaphase-to-anaphase transitions (spindle checkpoint). f. Experimental design to assess the role of sAC in cell cycle progression in astrocyte cultures. g. Synchronization of astrocyte proliferation with aphidicolin. Relative frequency histogram of genomic DNA content after 20 hr aphidicolin treatment and removal with hours after release indicated. h. Fraction of cells in S phase (cells between dotted lines in panel g) following the indicated hours after removal of aphidicolin (n = 3 cultures). i. Relative frequency histograms of effects of 2HE treatment on cell cycle arrest in asynchronous (A) and synchronized (S) human astrocyte cultures. j. Quantification of panel i (n = 4 cultures). Two-way ANOVA with Tukey test. p > 0.05 is non-significant, n.s. All data are shown as mean values ± s.e.m. e,f, Created with BioRender.com.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Soluble adenylyl cyclase inhibits stress-associated p21 expression in proliferating astrocytes.

Bulk RNA-seq for human astrocytes shown in Fig. 2j–k and studied using the experimental paradigm shown Extended Data Fig. 2f. a. Inhibiting sAC induces p53, HIF-1α and NF-Kβ stress signalling pathways (red) and downregulation of canonical cell cycle signalling pathways (green) in proliferating astrocytes. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) of KH7-, S-phase inhibitor aphidocolin- and G2/M inhibitor nocodazole-treated human astrocyte cultures. Aphidicolin and nocodazole differentially affect stress and cell cycle signalling consistent with their unique mechanisms of action. b. Volcano plots highlighting an upregulation of p53-, HIF-1α- and NF-κB-associated gene expression (red) and downregulation of canonical cell cycle genes (green). c. Gene expression analysis of p53-, NF-κB- and Hif-1α-associated genes demonstrating p21 (CDKN1A) is the most significantly upregulated stress-associated gene induced by KH7. d. Gene expression analysis of cell cycle-associated genes showing KH7 treatment induces a significant downregulation of known p21 targets including CCNB1, CDC25A, CDC25B and CDC25C. Moderated t-statistics test; b-d .

Extended Data Fig. 4 Effects of sAC KO on astrocyte C3 and p21 expression.

a. Loss of sAC in reactive optic nerve astrocytes induces C3 expression. Representative images of C3 immunostaining in CTRL and sAC KO optic nerve astrocytes 500 µm from the crush site. Scale bar is 20 µm. b. sAC KO leads to significantly increased C3 intensity (n = 91 cells from 5 optic nerves). Dotted lines represent 25th and 75th percentiles. Dashed line represents median. Two-sided Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. c. sAC KO leads to a significant increase in neurotoxic C3-positive reactive astrocytes using CTRL median as a threshold (n = 5 optic nerves). Two-tailed unpaired t-test. d. Representative images of p21 immunostaining in CTRL and sAC KO optic nerve astrocytes 500 µm from the crush site. Scale bar is 20 µm. i. Quantification of p21+ astrocytes demonstrating a significant increase in p21 expression in GFP-positive sAC KO astrocytes relative to controls (n = 5 optic nerves). Two-tailed unpaired t-test. All data are shown as mean values ± s.e.m.

Source Data

Extended Data Fig. 5 AAV5 and AAV8 transduction in the retina with CMV, GFAP and gfaABC(1)D promoters.

a. Representative optic nerve head (ONH) cross-sections demonstrating tdTomato reporter expression for each viral vector tested. ONH region defined as the area between the glial lamina and optic disc rim ~200 µm from the centre of the retina. Scale bar is 50 µm. b. Representative cross-sections of transduced retinas at a distance (>500 µm) from the ONH. Closed arrowheads showing transduced NFL astrocytes. Open arrowheads showing transduced Muller glial cells in the inner nuclear layer (INL). NFL astrocytes defined by GFAP and Sox9 in the inner retina. Muller glia defined by Sox9 and DAPI in the INL. Photoreceptors defined by DAPI in the outer nuclear later (ONL). Scale bar is 50 µm. c. Representative retinal flat-mounts showing tdTomato reporter expression for each viral vector tested. RGCs identified by RBPMS immunostaining. Scale bar is 500 µm. d. Magnified ONH and retinal regions from retinal flat-mount (dashed in c). Open arrowheads showing transduced RGCs. Scale bar is 50 µm. e. Representative ONH cross-sections immunostained for Iba1 showing microglia and virus co-localization. Scale bar is 50 µm. f. Quantification of reporter expression in principal retinal cell types (AAV5.gfaABC(1)D, n = 5 retinas; AAV8.gfaABC(1)D, n = 3 retinas; AAV5.GFAP, n = 3 retinas; AAV8.GFAP, n = 3 retinas; AAV5.CMV, n = 2 retinas; AAV8.CMV, n = 2 retinas). One-way ANOVA with Tukey test. All data are shown as mean values ± s.e.m.

Source Data

Extended Data Fig. 6 Compartmented cAMP in optic nerve head (ONH) astrocytes differentially regulates proliferation and C3 expression after optic nerve crush injury.

a. Representative images of AAV5.gfaABC(1)D.tdTomato (control), NES-sponge and NLS-sponge effects on ONH astrocyte proliferation after injury. Scale bar is 50 µm. b. Buffering cytoplasmic cAMP in ONH astrocytes promotes proliferation after injury (n = 4 retinas). One-way ANOVA with Tukey test. c. Representative images of ONH C3 immunoreactivity in AAV5.gfaABC(1)D.tdTomato (control), NES-sponge and NLS-sponge transduced retinas after injury. Scale bar is 50 µm. d. Buffering nuclear cAMP in ONH astrocytes induces significant C3 expression (n = 4 retinas). One-way ANOVA with Tukey test. e. Representative images of ONH astrocyte proliferation in AAV5.gfaABC(1)D.GFP (control) and AAV5.gfaABC(1)D.Cre-GFP (sAC KO) injected sACfl/fl mouse eyes following injury. f. sAC KO inhibits ONH astrocyte proliferation after injury (n = 2 retinas). p > 0.05 is non-significant, n.s. All data are shown as mean values ± s.e.m.

Source Data

Extended Data Fig. 7 Model for sAC-dependent reactive astrocyte differentiation and regulation of glial–glial and glial-neuronal signalling in response to injury.

Nuclear and cytoplasmic sAC-derived cAMP differentially regulate neuroprotective astrocyte proliferation through the regulation of p21. Proliferating neuroprotective reactive astrocytes inhibit deleterious microglial activation and downstream neurotoxic astrocyte reactivity, thus influencing the balance between neuroprotective and neurotoxic reactive phenotypes and the extent of retinal ganglion cell (RGC) survival.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Fig. 1 and Tables 1–3.

Reporting Summary

Source data

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cameron, E.G., Nahmou, M., Toth, A.B. et al. A molecular switch for neuroprotective astrocyte reactivity. Nature 626, 574–582 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06935-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06935-3

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing