Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Remote detection of a lunar granitic batholith at Compton–Belkovich

Nature volume 620, pages 116–121 (2023)Cite this article

Subjects

An Author Correction to this article was published on 25 September 2023

This article has been updated

Abstract

Granites are nearly absent in the Solar System outside of Earth. Achieving granitic compositions in magmatic systems requires multi-stage melting and fractionation, which also increases the concentration of radiogenic elements1. Abundant water and plate tectonics facilitate these processes on Earth, aiding in remelting. Although these drivers are absent on the Moon, small granite samples have been found, but details of their origin and the scale of systems they represent are unknown2. Here we report microwave-wavelength measurements of an anomalously hot geothermal source that is best explained by the presence of an approximately 50-kilometre-diameter granitic system below the thorium-rich farside feature known as Compton–Belkovich. Passive microwave radiometry is sensitive to the integrated thermal gradient to several wavelengths depth. The 3–37-gigahertz antenna temperatures of the Chang’e-1 and Chang’e-2 microwave instruments allow us to measure a peak heat flux of about 180 milliwatts per square metre, which is about 20 times higher than that of the average lunar highlands3,4. The surprising magnitude and geographic extent of this feature imply an Earth-like, evolved granitic system larger than believed possible on the Moon, especially outside of the Procellarum region5. Furthermore, these methods are generalizable: similar uses of passive radiometric data could vastly expand our knowledge of geothermal processes on the Moon and other planetary bodies.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Latitudinally corrected 3-GHz TA shown at midnight local time.
Fig. 2: Microwave expectations from a geothermal source.
Fig. 3: Data minus forward model TA compared with the best-fit pluton model.
Fig. 4: Geophysical models of the Compton–Belkovich batholith.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data used to make the figures in this paper are available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7786749. The original Chang’e‐1 and Chang’e-2 MRM data can be downloaded from http://moon.bao.ac.cn/index_en.jsp. Our group has also produced a readable global gridded data product of all available Chang’e-1 and Chang’e-2 data at https://zenodo.org/record/7790013. Source data are provided with this paper.

Change history

References

  1. Pitcher, W. S. The Nature and Origin of Granite (Springer Science & Business Media, 1997).

  2. Seddio, S. M., Korotev, R. L., Jolliff, B. L. & Wang, A. Silica polymorphs in lunar granite: implications for granite petrogenesis on the Moon. Am. Mineral. 100, 1533–1543 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Siegler, M. A. et al. Lunar heat flow: global predictions and reduced heat flux. J. Geophys. Res. Planets https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JE007182 (2022).

  4. Langseth, M. G., Keihm, S. J. & Peters, K. Revised lunar heat-flow values. In Proc. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference Vol. 7, 3143–3171 (Lunar and Planetary Institute, 1976).

  5. Glotch, T. D. et al. Highly silicic compositions on the Moon. Science 329, 1510–1513 (2010).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lawrence, D. J. et al. High resolution measurements of absolute thorium abundances on the lunar surface. Geophys. Res. Lett. 26, 2681–2684 (1999).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lawrence, D. J. et al. Small‐area thorium features on the lunar surface. J. Geophys. Res. Planets https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JE002050 (2003).

  8. Hagerty, J. J. et al. Refined thorium abundances for lunar red spots: Implications for evolved, nonmare volcanism on the Moon. J. Geophys. Res. Planets https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JE002592 (2006).

  9. Wilson, J. T. et al. Evidence for explosive silicic volcanism on the Moon from the extended distribution of thorium near the Compton–Belkovich Volcanic Complex. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 120, 92–108 (2015).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jolliff, B. L. et al. Compton–Belkovich: nonmare, silicic volcanism on the Moon’s far side. In Proc. 42nd Annual Lunar and Planetary Science Conference 1608, 2224 (Lunar and Planetary Institute, 2011).

  11. Jolliff, B. L. et al. Non-mare silicic volcanism on the lunar farside at Compton–Belkovich. Nat. Geosci. 4, 566–571 (2011b).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jolliff, B. L. et al. Compton–Belkovich Volcanic Complex. In Proc. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference 1659, 2097 (Lunar and Planetary Institute, 2012).

  13. Clegg-Watkins, R. N. et al. Nonmare volcanism on the Moon: photometric evidence for the presence of evolved silicic materials. Icarus 285, 169–184 (2017).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Chauhan, M., Bhattacharya, S., Saran, S., Chauhan, P. & Dagar, A. Compton–Belkovich Volcanic Complex (CBVC): an ash flow caldera on the Moon. Icarus 253, 115–129 (2015).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Head, J. W. & Wilson, L. Generation, ascent and eruption of magma on the Moon: new insights into source depths, magma supply, intrusions and effusive/explosive eruptions (part 2: predicted emplacement processes and observation). Icarus 283, 176–223 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. del Potro, R., Díez, M., Blundy, J., Camacho, A. G. & Gottsmann, J. Diapiric ascent of silicic magma beneath the Bolivian Altiplano. Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 2044–2048 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wilson, L. & Head, J. W. Explosive volcanism associated with the silicic Compton–Belkovich volcanic complex: implications for magma water content. In Proc. 47th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference 1564 (Lunar and Planetary Institute, 2016).

  18. Feng, J., Siegler, M. A. & Hayne, P. O. New constraints on thermal and dielectric properties of lunar regolith from LRO diviner and CE‐2 microwave radiometer. J. Geophys. Res. Planets https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JE006130 (2020).

  19. Siegler, M. A. et al. Lunar titanium and frequency‐dependent microwave loss tangent as constrained by the Chang’e‐2 MRM and LRO diviner lunar radiometers. J. Geophys. Res. Planets https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JE006405 (2020).

  20. Wieczorek, M. A. et al. The crust of the Moon as seen by GRAIL. Science 339, 671–675 (2013).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Siegler, M. A. & Smrekar, S. E. Lunar heat flow: regional prospective of the Apollo landing sites. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 119, 47–63 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Seddio, S. M., Jolliff, B. L., Korotev, R. L. & Carpenter, P. K. Thorite in an Apollo 12 granite fragment and age determination using the electron microprobe. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 135, 307–320 (2014).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ryder, G. & Martinez, R. R. Evolved hypabyssal rocks from station 7, Apennine Front, Apollo 15. In Proc. Lunar and Planetary Science Vol. 21, 749 (Lunar and Planetary Institute, 1991).

  24. Warren, P. H., Taylor, G. J. & Keil, K. Regolith breccia Allan Hills A81005: evidence of lunar origin, and petrography of pristine and nonpristine clasts. Geophys. Res. Lett. 10, 779–782 (1983).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Seddio, S. M., Jolliff, B. L., Korotev, R. L. & Zeigler, R. A. Petrology and geochemistry of lunar granite 12032, 366-19 and implications for lunar granite petrogenesis. Am. Mineral. 98, 1697–1713 (2013).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Goossens, S. et al. High‐resolution gravity field models from GRAIL data and implications for models of the density structure of the Moon’s crust. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 125, e2019JE006086 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kiefer, W. S., Macke, R. J., Britt, D. T., Irving, A. J. & Consolmagno, G. J. The density and porosity of lunar rocks. Geophys. Res. Lett. 39, L07201 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Gillis, J. J. et al. The Compton–Belkovich region of the Moon: remotely sensed observations and lunar sample association. In Proc. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference (Lunar and Planetary Institute, 2002).

  29. Laneuville, M. et al. A long-lived lunar dynamo powered by core crystallization. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 401, 251–260 (2014).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Neal, C. R. & Taylor, L. A. The nature and barium partitioning between immiscible melts—a comparison of experimental and natural systems with reference to lunar granite petrogenesis. In Proc. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference Vol. 19, 209–218 (Lunar and Planetary Institute, 1989).

  31. Fagan, T. J., Kashima, D., Wakabayashi, Y. & Suginohara, A. Case study of magmatic differentiation trends on the Moon based on lunar meteorite Northwest Africa 773 and comparison with Apollo 15 quartz monzodiorite. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 133, 97–127 (2014).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Rutherford, M. J., Hess, P. C., Ryerson, F. J., Campbell, H. W. & Dick, P. A. The chemistry, origin and petrogenetic implications of lunar granite and monzonite. In Proc. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference Vol. 7, 1723–1740 (Lunar and Planetary Institute, 1976).

  33. Ryder, G., Stoeser, D. B., Marvin, U. B. & Bower, J. F. Lunar granites with unique ternary feldspars. In Proc. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference Vol. 6, 435–449 (Lunar and Planetary Institute, 1975).

  34. Hess, P. C., Horzempa, P. & Rutherford, M. J. Fractionation of Apollo 15 KREEP basalts. In Proc. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference Vol. 20 (Lunar and Planetary Institute, 1989).

  35. Marvin, U. B., Lindstrom, M. M., Holmberg, B. B. & Martinez, R. R. New observations on the quartz monzodiorite-granite suite. In Proc. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference Vol. 21, 119–135 (Lunar and Planetary Institute, 1991).

  36. Gullikson, A. L., Hagerty, J. J., Reid, M. R., Rapp, J. F. & Draper, D. S. Silicic lunar volcanism: testing the crustal melting model. Am. Mineral. 101, 2312–2321 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. Warren, P. H. & Wasson, J. T. The origin of KREEP. Rev. Geophys. 17, 73–88 (1979).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Taylor, S. R. & McLennan, S. Planetary Crusts: Their Composition, Origin and Evolution Vol. 10 (Cambridge Univ. Press., 2009); https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511575358.

  39. Neal, C. R. et al. The Lunar Geophysical Network (LGN) is critical for Solar System science and human exploration. In Proc. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference 2355 (Lunar and Planetary Institute, 2020).

  40. Zheng, Y. et al. First microwave map of the Moon with Chang’e-1 data: the role of local time in global imaging. Icarus 219, 194–210 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. Fa, W. & Jin, Y.-Q. A primary analysis of microwave brightness temperature of lunar surface from Chang-e 1 multi-channel radiometer observation and inversion of regolith layer thickness. Icarus 207, 605–615 (2010).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Gong, X., Paige, D. A., Siegler, M. A. & Jin, Y.-Q. Inversion of dielectric properties of the lunar regolith media with temperature profiles using Chang’e microwave radiometer observations. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 12, 384–388 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Hu, G.-P., Chan, K. L., Zheng, Y.-C. & Xu, A.-A. A rock model for the cold and hot spots in the Chang’e microwave brightness temperature map. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 56, 5471–5480 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  44. Wei, G., Byrne, S., Li, X. & Hu, G. Lunar surface and buried rock abundance retrieved from Chang’e-2 microwave and diviner data. Planet. Sci. J. 1, 56 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Wei, G., Li, X. & Wang, S. Inversions of subsurface temperature and thermal diffusivity on the Moon based on high frequency of Chang’e-1 microwave radiometer data. Icarus 275, 97–106 (2016).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Siegler, M. & Feng, J. Microwave remote sensing of lunar subsurface temperatures: reconciling Chang’e MRM and LRO diviner. In Proc. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference 1705 (Lunar and Planetary Institute, 2017).

  47. Fang, T. & Fa, W. High frequency thermal emission from the lunar surface and near surface temperature of the Moon from Chang’e-2 microwave radiometer. Icarus 232, 34–53 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  48. Meng, Z. et al. Passive microwave probing mare basalts in mare Imbrium using CE-2 CELMS data. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 11, 3097–3104 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  49. Wei, G., Li, X. & Wang, S. Thermal behavior of regolith at cold traps on the Moon’s south pole: revealed by Chang’e-2 microwave radiometer data. Planet. Space Sci. 122, 101–109 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  50. Feng, J. & Siegler, M. A. Reconciling the infrared and microwave observations of the lunar south pole: a study on subsurface temperature and regolith density. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 126, e2020JE006623 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  51. Ulaby, F. T., Moore, R. K. & Fung, A. K. Microwave Remote Sensing: Active and Passive. Volume 2—Radar Remote Sensing and Surface Scattering and Emission Theory (Artech House, 1982).

  52. Ulaby, F. T., Moore, R. K. & Fung, A. K. Microwave Remote Sensing: Active and Passive. Volume 3—From Theory to Applications (Artech House, 1986).

  53. Carrier, W. D. III, Olhoeft, G. R. & Mendell, W. Physical Properties of the Lunar Surface: Lunar Sourcebook 475–594 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1991).

  54. Wang, Z. et al. Calibration and brightness temperature algorithm of CE-1 Lunar Microwave Sounder (CELMS). Sci. China Earth Sci. 53, 1392–1406 (2010).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Hayne, P. O. et al. Global regolith thermophysical properties of the Moon from the Diviner Lunar Radiometer Experiment. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 122, 2371–2400 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  56. Paige, D. A. et al. Thermal stability of volatiles in the north polar region of Mercury. Science 339, 300–303 (2013).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Paige, D. A. et al. Diviner lunar radiometer observations of cold traps in the Moon’s south polar region. Science 330, 479–482 (2010).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Siegler, M., Paige, D., Williams, J. P. & Bills, B. Evolution of lunar polar ice stability. Icarus 255, 78–87 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  59. Siegler, M. A. et al. Lunar true polar wander inferred from polar hydrogen. Nature 531, 480–484 (2016).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Mitchell, D. L. & De Pater, I. Microwave imaging of Mercury’s thermal emission at wavelengths from 0.3 to 20.5 cm. Icarus 110, 2–32 (1994).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  61. Whipple, F. L. The theory of micro-meteorites: Part I. In an isothermal atmosphere. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 36, 687–695 (1950).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Vasavada, A. R. et al. Lunar equatorial surface temperatures and regolith properties from the Diviner Lunar Radiometer Experiment. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 117, E00H18 (2012).

  63. Gudmundsson, A. Magma-chamber geometry, fluid transport, local stresses and rock behaviour during collapse caldera formation. Dev. Volcanol. 10, 313–349 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Geyer, A., Folch, A. & Martí, J. Relationship between caldera collapse and magma chamber withdrawal: an experimental approach. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 157, 375–386 (2006).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Shirley, K. A., Zanetti, M., Jolliff, B. L., van der Bogert, C. H. & Hiesinger, H. Crater size–frequency distribution measurements at the Compton–Belkovich Volcanic Complex. Icarus 273, 214–223 (2016).

  66. Besserer, J. et al. GRAIL gravity constraints on the vertical and lateral density structure of the lunar crust. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 5771–5777 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  67. Cho, W. J., Kwon, S. & Choi, J. W. The thermal conductivity for granite with various water contents. Eng. Geol. 107, 167–171 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Wieczorek, M. A. & Phillips, R. J. Potential anomalies on a sphere: applications to the thickness of the lunar crust. J. Geophys. Res. 103, 1715–1724 (1998).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  69. Kiefer, W. S. et al. The bulk density of the small lunar volcanos Gruithuisen Delta and Hansteen Alpha: implications for volcano composition and petrogenesis. In Proc. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference Vol. 47, 1722 (Lunar and Planetary Institute, 2016).

  70. Jansen, J. C. et al. The subsurface structure of the Compton–Belkovich thorium anomaly as revealed by GRAIL. In Proc. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference 1832, 2185 (Lunar and Planetary Institute, 2015).

  71. Blakely, R. J. Approximating edges of source bodies from magnetic or gravity anomalies. Geophysics 51, 1494–1498 (1986).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded through Lunar Data Analysis Grant 80NSSC20K1430 and work related with the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Diviner Lunar Radiometer.

Author information

Author notes

  1. These authors contributed equally: Matthew A. Siegler, Jianqing Feng

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Planetary Science Institute, Tucson, AZ, USA

    Matthew A. Siegler & Jianqing Feng

  2. Department of Earth Sciences, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX, USA

    Matthew A. Siegler, Jianqing Feng, Katelyn Lehman-Franco, Rita C. Economos & Mackenzie N. White

  3. Department of Planetary Sciences/Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA

    Jeffrey C. Andrews-Hanna

  4. Million Concepts, Louisville, KY, USA

    Michael St. Clair & Chase Million

  5. Department of Earth, Environmental and Planetary Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA

    James W. Head

  6. Department of Geosciences, SUNY Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY, USA

    Timothy D. Glotch

Authors
  1. Matthew A. Siegler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jianqing Feng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Katelyn Lehman-Franco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jeffrey C. Andrews-Hanna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Rita C. Economos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Michael St. Clair
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Chase Million
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. James W. Head
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Timothy D. Glotch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Mackenzie N. White
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

M.A.S.: primary writing, central ideas and concepts, figures and funding. J.F.: primary data processing, microwave modelling, writing, central ideas and data interpretation. K.L.-F.: petrologic model synthesis, writing and figure creation. J.C.A.-H.: gravity modelling, synthesis and writing. R.C.E.: petrologic model synthesis, writing and advised K.L.-F. M.S.C.: lead data product production (of global maps), science discussions, detailed review and editing. C.M.: aided in data product production (of global maps), science discussions, detailed review and editing. J.W.H.: science discussions, detailed review and editing. T.D.G.: science discussion, review and editing. M.N.W.: copy-editing and figure editing.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Matthew A. Siegler or Jianqing Feng.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature thanks David Lawrence and Sarah Valencia for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Fig. 1 Loss Tangent Derivation from Chang’e 2 data.

(a) Integrated loss tangent for each of the four frequencies derived from Chang’e 2 microwave amplitudes and thermal model fits (as in19) (b) Integrated loss tangent as a function of frequency for (black) the areas within 1 degree of CBVC, (red) the entire maps in ED1, and (blue) the highlands terrain model from19. The blue line is used for our modeling of the CBVC heat flux.

Source Data

Extended Data Fig. 2 Chang’e instrument antenna pattern models.

Simulated antenna patterns for each of the four MRM frequencies. Here they are plotted in antenna angle, leading to different spatial footprints for the Chang’e 1 vs. 2 missions due to their 200 and 100 km altitudes.

Source Data

Extended Data Fig. 3 Chang’e 2 antenna temperature data processing.

(a) Antenna temperatures as a function of time of day and distance from CBVC, (b) Gridded noontime antenna temperature data from the Chang’e 2 MRM mission centered at Compton-Belkovich overlain on LROC WAC topography- units in K. Note the trend in temperatures with latitude. (c) Gridded ΔTA data from the Chang’e 2 MRM mission centered at Compton-Belkovich after latitude correction overlain on LROC WAC topography- units in K. The 3 GHz 3c figure is used in main text Fig. 1.

Source Data

Extended Data Fig. 4 Forward model based of brightness temperatures.

(upper) Modeled surface temperature at night without a CBVC source. (lower) Full resolution modeled brightness temperature of four frequencies (again without a CBVC source) at night before convolution.

Source Data

Extended Data Fig. 5 Forward model of antenna temperatures, TA.

The modeled antenna temperature (in the absence of a CBVC heat source) at four frequencies after convolution.

Source Data

Extended Data Fig. 6 Data/forward model differences.

(a-d) The “data minus model” residual antenna temperature (units K) at four frequencies subtracted from the Chang’e 2 data. Contours map the LP-GRS Th enhancement (after Wilson et al.7), (e) The pixon-reconstructed LP-GRS Th concentrations with contours of CE-2 3 GHz data- model values. (f) CE-2 data minus model residual antenna temperature at four frequencies as a function of surface measured Th.

Source Data

Extended Data Fig. 7 Possible evolution of the CBVC subsurface system.

The resolution of the gravity and heat flow models is insufficient to inform internal variations in a body that must have formed from a complex system of magma chambers. This figure is one example of a system that could be represented by the Compton Belkovich batholith model and how that system could develop over time.

Extended Data Fig. 8 Model differences as a function of pluton geometry.

(a) Absolute data-model differences in peak TA for the 5 km e-folding density crustal model for various pluton diameters. Stars show minima for different crustal density models. (b) Absolute data-model differences in peak TA over the area within 15 km of the center of CBVC for the 5 km e-folding density crustal model for various pluton diameters.

Source Data

Extended Data Fig. 9 Model differences as a function of pluton geometry examining sensitivity to heat production of upper pluton.

(a) same as 8b, but for both the upper and lower pluton at 69.7 ppm Th. (b) 8b and 9a, but with no heat production from upper pluton and lower Pluton at 69.7 ppm Th, showing that most of the heat observed heat is coming from the lower magmatic system.

Source Data

Extended Data Fig. 10 Gravity models and GRAIL data for the CBVC.

Observed Bouguer gravity data and model corrected Bouguer gravity. Bouguer gravity for an assumed crustal density of (a) 2500 kg/m3, with corrections for the modeled density assuming lower intrusion densities of (b) 60 kg/m3, (c) 90 kg/m3, (d) 120 kg/m3, and (e) 200 kg/m3 and (f) North-south profiles of the observed and model corrected Bouguer gravity for assumed density contrasts of 60–120 kg/m3.

Source Data

Supplementary information

Source data

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Siegler, M.A., Feng, J., Lehman-Franco, K. et al. Remote detection of a lunar granitic batholith at Compton–Belkovich. Nature 620, 116–121 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06183-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06183-5

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing