Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Matters Arising
  • Published:

Reply to: Ptbp1 deletion does not induce astrocyte-to-neuron conversion

The Original Article was published on 07 June 2023

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Analysis of the scRNA-seq data from the cortex of Ptbp1-knockout mice.
Fig. 2: Re-analysis of the original lineage-tracing data.

Data availability

The scRNA-seq data are from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GSE184933) generated and deposited by Hoang et al.1. All other data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors on request.

References

  1. Hoang, T. et al. Ptbp1 depletion does not induce astrocyte-to-neuron conversion. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06066-9 (2023).

  2. Qian, H. et al. Reversing a model of Parkinson’s disease with in situ converted nigral neurons. Nature 582, 550–556 (2020).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang, L.-L. et al. Revisiting astrocyte to neuron conversion with lineage tracing in vivo. Cell 184, 5465–5481 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, W., Zheng, Q., Huang, Q., Ma, S. & Li, M. Repressing PTBP1 fails to convert reactive astrocytes to dopaminergic neurons in a 6-hydroxydopamine mouse model of Parkinson’s disease. eLife 11, e75636 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Shibayama, M. et al. Polypyrimidine tract‐binding protein is essential for early mouse development and embryonic stem cell proliferation. FEBS J. 276, 6658–6668 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Xue, Y. et al. Sequential regulatory loops as key gatekeepers for neuronal reprogramming in human cells. Nat. Neurosci. 19, 807–815 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Lu, T. et al. REST and stress resistance in ageing and Alzheimer’s disease. Nature 507, 448–454 (2014).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Gao, Z. et al. The master negative regulator REST/NRSF controls adult neurogenesis by restraining the neurogenic program in quiescent stem cells. J. Neurosci. 31, 9772–9786 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. El-Brolosy, M. A. & Stainier, D. Y. Genetic compensation: a phenomenon in search of mechanisms. PLoS Genet. 13, e1006780 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Boutz, P. L. et al. A post-transcriptional regulatory switch in polypyrimidine tract-binding proteins reprograms alternative splicing in developing neurons. Genes Dev. 21, 1636–1652 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Xue, Y. et al. Direct conversion of fibroblasts to neurons by reprogramming PTB-regulated microRNA circuits. Cell 152, 82–96 (2013).

  12. Zhang, X. et al. CellMarker: a manually curated resource of cell markers in human and mouse. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D721–D728 (2019).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Qiu, X. et al. Reversed graph embedding resolves complex single-cell trajectories. Nat. Methods 14, 979–982 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Luecken, M. D. & Theis, F. J. Current best practices in single-cell RNA-seq analysis: a tutorial. Mol. Syst. Biol. 15, e8746 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. McGinnis, C. S., Murrow, L. M. & Gartner, Z. J. DoubletFinder: doublet detection in single-cell RNA sequencing data using artificial nearest neighbors. Cell Syst. 8, 329–337 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Y.H. performed analysis of the scRNA-seq data. H.Q., J.H. and X.-D.F. wrote the Reply with input from J.H., Y.X., S.F.D. and W.C.M. Note that the author list is different from that in the original paper2 because we recruited the first author of the Reply, Y.H., to analyse the scRNA-seq data and omitted several collaborators whose work was not related to the subjects raised by Hoang et al.1.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hao Qian or Xiang-Dong Fu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Fig. 1 Quality control in analyzing the scRNA-seq data.

a,b,c, Violin plots of n-count_RNA, n-feature_RNA and Percent_mt (mitochondrial transcripts) distribution in cells from WT, heterozygous or homozygous Ptbp1 KO cortex (a), striatum (b) and substantia nigra (c). Center lines in boxplots are the median and box is the interquartile range (IQR). n = 13198, n = 14732, n = 17071 cells for WT, heterozygous and homozygous Ptbp1 KO cortex; n = 12145, n = 12175, n = 15710 cells for WT, heterozygous and homozygous Ptbp1 KO striatum; n = 5741, n = 4518, n = 2965 cells for WT, heterozygous and homozygous Ptbp1 KO substantia nigra. d,e,f, Expression of cell type-specific marker genes in each cluster defined from cortex (d), striatum (e) and substantia nigra (f) scRNA-seq data.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Reanalyzing the scRNA-seq data from striatum.

a, UMAP of cells from striatum of different genotypes (left). Colored clusters are annotated to different cell types based on an established panel of cell markers. Expression of top 10 marker genes in Cluster 10 was compared with other clusters (right). Red text: neuronal genes. b, Expression of GFP, Ptbp1, and Ptbp2 in individual cell clusters from WT (red); green: heterozygous (green), and homozygous (blue) Ptbp1 KO mice.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Reanalyzing the scRNA data from substantia nigra.

a, UMAP of cells from substantia nigra of different genotypes. b, Relative quantity of cells in different clusters (indicated at top). c, Expression of GFP, Ptbp1, and Ptbp2 in individual cell clusters from WT (red), heterozygous (green), and homozygous (blue) Ptbp1 KO mice. d, Expression of top 10 marker genes in Cluster 5, compared with other clusters (right). Green text: astrocytic genes, Red text: neuronal genes. e, Identification of potential doublets with DoubletFinder, showing that most cells in Cluster 5 are unlikely to be doublets.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hao, Y., Hu, J., Xue, Y. et al. Reply to: Ptbp1 deletion does not induce astrocyte-to-neuron conversion. Nature 618, E8–E13 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06067-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06067-8

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing