Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Observing the onset of pressure-driven K-shell delocalization

Abstract

The gravitational pressure in many astrophysical objects exceeds one gigabar (one billion atmospheres)1,2,3, creating extreme conditions where the distance between nuclei approaches the size of the K shell. This close proximity modifies these tightly bound states and, above a certain pressure, drives them into a delocalized state4. Both processes substantially affect the equation of state and radiation transport and, therefore, the structure and evolution of these objects. Still, our understanding of this transition is far from satisfactory and experimental data are sparse. Here we report on experiments that create and diagnose matter at pressures exceeding three gigabars at the National Ignition Facility5 where 184 laser beams imploded a beryllium shell. Bright X-ray flashes enable precision radiography and X-ray Thomson scattering that reveal both the macroscopic conditions and the microscopic states. The data show clear signs of quantum-degenerate electrons in states reaching 30 times compression, and a temperature of around two million kelvins. At the most extreme conditions, we observe strongly reduced elastic scattering, which mainly originates from K-shell electrons. We attribute this reduction to the onset of delocalization of the remaining K-shell electron. With this interpretation, the ion charge inferred from the scattering data agrees well with ab initio simulations, but it is significantly higher than widely used analytical models predict6.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Schematic of the experiment and examples of raw data.
Fig. 2: XRTS spectra and fits.
Fig. 3: Summary of the experimental results.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The three additional scattering spectra not shown in Fig. 2b are included as Extended Data Figs. 13. Additional data are available upon request from the corresponding author. Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

The Multi-Component Scattering Spectra (MCSS) code40 for analysing X-ray Thomson scattering spectra is not publicly available. An open-source code is currently under development with support from some members of our team.

References

  1. Burrows, A., Hubbard, W. B., Saumon, D. & Lunine, J. I. An expanded set of brown dwarf and very low mass star models. Astrophys. J. 406, 158 (1993).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chabrier, G. & Baraffe, I. Theory of low-mass stars and substellar objects. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 38, 337–377 (2000).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kritcher, A. L. et al. A measurement of the equation of state of carbon envelopes of white dwarfs. Nature 584, 51–54 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kremp, D., Schlanges, M. & Kraeft, W.-D. Quantum Statistics of Nonideal Plasmas (Springer, 2005).

  5. Moses, E. I., Boyd, R. N., Remington, B. A., Keane, C. J. & Al-Ayat, R. The National Ignition Facility: ushering in a new age for high energy density science. Phys. Plasmas 16, 041006 (2009).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Stewart, J. C. & Pyatt, K. D. Lowering of ionization potentials in plasmas. Astrophys. J. 144, 1203 (1966).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Becker, A., Bethkenhagen, M., Kellermann, C., Wicht, J. & Redmer, R. Material properties for the interiors of massive giant planets and brown dwarfs. Astron. J. 156, 149 (2018).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Knudson, M. D. et al. Direct observation of an abrupt insulator-to-metal transition in dense liquid deuterium. Science 348, 1455–1460 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Celliers, P. M. et al. Insulator–metal transition in dense fluid deuterium. Science 361, 677–682 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Davis, P. et al. X-ray scattering measurements of dissociation-induced metallization of dynamically compressed deuterium. Nat. Commun. 7, 11189 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Glenzer, S. H. & Redmer, R. X-ray Thomson scattering in high energy density plasmas. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 1625 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bishel, D. T. et al. Using time-resolved penumbral imaging to measure low hot spot X-ray emission signals from capsule implosions at the National Ignition Facility. Rev. Scient. Instrum. 89, 10G111 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kraus, D. et al. Platform for spectrally resolved X-ray scattering from imploding capsules at the National Ignition Facility. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 717, 012067 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Döppner, T. et al. Qualification of a high-efficiency, gated spectrometer for X-ray Thomson scattering on the National Ignition Facility. Rev. Scient. Instrum. 85, 11D617 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gregori, G., Glenzer, S. H., Rozmus, W., Lee, R. W. & Landen, O. L. Theoretical model of X-ray scattering as a dense matter probe. Phys. Rev. E 67, 026412 (2003).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Glenzer, S. H. et al. Demonstration of spectrally resolved X-ray scattering in dense plasmas. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 175002 (2003).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee, H. J. et al. X-ray Thomson-scattering measurements of density and temperature in shock-compressed beryllium. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 115001 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kritcher, A. L. et al. In-flight measurements of capsule shell adiabats in laser-driven implosions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 015002 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fortmann, C. et al. Measurement of the adiabatic index in Be compressed by counterpropagating shocks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 175006 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rogers, F. J., Swenson, F. J. & Iglesias, C. A. OPAL equation-of-state tables for astrophysical applications. Astrophys. J. 456, 902 (1996).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Salzmann, D. Atomic Physics in Hot Plasmas (Oxford Univ. Press, 1998).

  22. Bethkenhagen, M. et al. Carbon ionization at gigabar pressures: an ab initio perspective on astrophysical high-density plasmas. Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 023260 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hurricane, O. A. et al. Fuel gain exceeding unity in an inertially confined fusion implosion. Nature 506, 343–348 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Zylstra, A. B. et al. Burning plasma achieved in inertial fusion. Nature 601, 542–548 (2022).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Wurzel, S. E. & Hsu, S. C. Progress toward fusion energy breakeven and gain as measured against the Lawson criterion. Phys. Plasmas 29, 062103 (2022).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Winget, D. E. et al. An independent method for determining the age of the Universe. Astrophys. J. 315, L77 (1987).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Fontaine, G., Brassard, P. & Bergeron, P. The potential of white dwarf cosmochronology. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 113, 409 (2001).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Lütgert, B. J. et al. Platform for probing radiation transport properties of hydrogen at conditions found in the deep interiors of red dwarfs. Phys. Plasmas 29, 083301 (2022).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Michel, P. et al. Tuning the implosion symmetry of ICF targets via controlled crossed-beam energy transfer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 025004 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kline, J. L. et al. First beryllium capsule implosions on the National Ignition Facility. Phys. Plasmas 23, 056310 (2016).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. Saunders, A. M. et al. Influence of argon impurities on the elastic scattering of X-rays from imploding beryllium capsules. High Energy Dens. Phys. 26, 86–92 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Boehm, K.-J. et al. Design and engineering of a target for X-ray Thomson scattering measurements on matter at extreme densities and gigabar pressures. Fusion Sci. Technol. 70, 324 (2016).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. Döppner, T. et al. Improving a high-efficiency, gated spectrometer for X-ray Thomson scattering experiments at the National Ignition Facility. Rev. Scient. Instrum. 87, 11E515 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Rygg, J. R. et al. 2D X-ray radiography of imploding capsules at the National Ignition Facility. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 195001 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Fletcher, L. B. et al. Ultrabright X-ray laser scattering for dynamic warm dense matter physics. Nat. Photon. 9, 274–279 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Kraus, D. et al. X-ray scattering measurements on imploding CH spheres at the National Ignition Facility. Phys. Rev. E 94, 011202 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Chihara, J. Interaction of photons with plasmas and liquid metals-photoabsorption and scattering. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 12, 231 (2000).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Chapman, D. A. Probing the Dynamic Structure of Dense Matter Using X-ray Scattering. PhD thesis, Univ. Warwick (2015).

  39. Wünsch, K., Vorberger, J., Gregori, G. & Gericke, D. O. X-ray scattering as a probe for warm dense mixtures and high-pressure miscibility. Europhys. Lett. 94, 25001 (2011).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. Chapman, D. A. User Guide and Theoretical Basis for the Multicomponent Scattering Spectra (MCSS) Thomson Scattering Analysis Code (AWE, 2017).

  41. Wünsch, K., Vorberger, J. & Gericke, D. O. Ion structure in warm dense matter: benchmarking solutions of hypernetted-chain equations by first-principle simulations. Phys. Rev. E 79, 010201 (2009).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. Chapman, D. A. et al. Observation of finite-wavelength screening in high-energy-density matter. Nat. Commun. 6, 6839 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Plagemann, K.-U. Ab initio calculation of the ion feature in X-ray Thomson scattering. Phys. Rev. E 92, 013103 (2015).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  44. Vorberger, J. & Gericke, D. O. Ab initio approach to model X-ray diffraction in warm dense matter. Phys. Rev. E 91, 033112 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Souza, A. N., Perkins, D. J., Starrett, C. E., Saumon, D. & Hansen, S. B. Predictions of X-ray scattering spectra for warm dense matter. Phys. Rev. E 89, 023108 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Baczewski, A. D., Shulenburger, L., Desjarlais, M. P., Hansen, S. B. & Magyar, R. J. X-ray Thomson scattering in warm dense matter without the Chihara decomposition. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 115004 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Kresse, G. & Hafner, J. Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals. Phys. Rev. B 47, 558–561 (1993).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Kresse, G. & Hafner, J. Ab initio molecular-dynamics simulation of the liquid-metal–amorphous-semiconductor transition in germanium. Phys. Rev. B 49, 14251–14269 (1994).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Nosé, S. A unified formulation of the constant temperature molecular dynamics methods. J. Chem. Phys. 81, 511–519 (1984).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  51. Baldereschi, A. Mean-value point in the Brillouin zone. Phys. Rev. B 7, 5212–5215 (1973).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Kubo, R. Statistical-mechanical theory of irreversible processes. I. General theory and simple applications to magnetic and conduction problems. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 12, 570–586 (1957).

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  54. Greenwood, D. A. The Boltzmann equation in the theory of electrical conduction in metals. Proc. Phys. Soc. 71, 585–596 (1958).

    ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the entire NIF operations, diagnostics, target design and assembly teams for support; K. Boehm and P. di Nicola for coordinating the target builds; N. Rice and H. Huang for making and metrologizing the beryllium capsules; D. Kalantar and N. Masters for resolving any alignment and machine safety issues; B. Remington and J. Lütgert for reading the manuscript and providing feedback; and M. Meamber for helping with figure design and formatting. The work of T.D., B.B., L.D., O.L.L., M.J.M, A.M.S. and P.A.S. was performed under the auspices of the US Department of Energy under contract no. DE-AC52-07NA27344, and was supported by Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) grant no. 18-ERD-033. The DFT-MD calculations were performed at the North-German Supercomputing Alliance (HLRN) facilities and at the IT and Media Center of the University of Rostock. M.B., M.S., B.B.L.W. and R.R. acknowledge support by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) within the FOR 2440. M.B. was also partially supported by the European Horizon 2020 programme within the Marie Skłodowska-Curie actions (xICE grant number 894725). D.K. was supported by the Helmholtz Association under VH-NG-1141. D.K. and R.W.F. acknowledge support by the US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Fusion Energy Sciences, award DE-AC02-05CH11231, and National Nuclear Security Administration, award DE-NA0003842. R.W.F. acknowledges support from the Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Award DE-NA0003842, and the Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Fusion Energy Sciences Awards DE-SC0021184 and DE-SC0018298. The work of L.B.F. and S.H.G. was supported by US Department of Energy, Fusion Energy Sciences under FEP 100182. The work of M.P.B. was partially supported by the Centre for Advanced Systems Understanding (CASUS), which is financed by Germany’s Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) and by the Saxon state government out of the State budget approved by the Saxon State Parliament. We also acknowledge the NIF Discovery Science programme for providing access to the facility. This document was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the US government. Neither the US government nor Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, nor any of their employees makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favouring by the United States government or Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the US government or Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, and shall not be used for advertising or product endorsement purposes.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

P.N., R.W.F. and S.H.G. proposed the experiments and aided in obtaining experimental beam time at NIF. A.Y., L.D., T.D. and O.L.L. developed the Be implosion design. T.D. fielded the experiments together with D.K., B.B., M.J.M. and A.M.S. The XRTS spectra were analysed by T.D., M.P.B., D.K. and L.B.F. Additional data analysis and feedback on analysis methods were provided by P.N., O.L.L., B.B., M.J.M., M.S. and A.M.S. D.O.G., D.A.C., J.V., R.A.B., M.P.B. and P.A.S. provided results for the ionization in dense plasmas and developed the framework for modelling XRTS spectra. M.B., M.S., B.B.L.W. and R.R. performed and analysed the DFT-MD simulations. All co-authors provided input on the interpretation of the data and their impact on astrophysics and ICF. T.D. and D.O.G. wrote the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Döppner.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature thanks Shinsuke Fujioka, Nigel Woolsey and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Fig. 1 X-ray Thomson scattering spectrum and fit for data set #1.

The data (black) was recorded on experiment N170214-002-999 on the first spectrometer channel (strip 1) at 0.31 ns after peak emission, t0. The best fit (red), consisting of the free-free (blue), bound-free (green) and elastic (purple) scattering contributions, yields a temperature of T = (110 ± 15) eV, a free electron density of ne = (1.34 ± 0.15) × 1024 cm−3 and an ion charge of \(\bar{Z}=3.0\pm 0.1\) resulting in a mass density of ϱ = (6.7 ± 1.0) g/cm3 (see row #1 in Table 1).

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 2 X-ray Thomson scattering spectrum and fit for data set #2.

The data (black) was recorded on experiment N180602-001-999 on the first spectrometer channel (strip 1) at 0.48 ns after peak emission, t0. The best fit (red), consisting of the free-free (blue), bound-free (green) and elastic scattering (purple) contributions, yieldsr a temperature of T = (119 ± 15) eV, a free electron density of ne = (1.9 ± 0.2) × 1024 cm−3 and an ion charge of \(\bar{Z}=3.05\pm 0.1\) resulting in a mass density of ϱ = (9.3 ± 1.3) g/cm3 (see row #2 in Table 1).

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 3 X-ray Thomson scattering spectrum and fit for data set #4.

The data (black) was recorded on experiment N180602-001-999 on the second spectrometer channel (strip 3) at 0.78 ns after peak emission, t0. The best fit (red), consisting of the free-free (blue), bound-free (green) and elastic scattering (purple) contributions, yields a temperature of T = (160 ± 20) eV, a free electron density of ne = (12 ± 1.5) × 1024 cm−3 and an ion charge of \(\bar{Z}=3.3\pm 0.1\) resulting in a mass density of ϱ = (55 ± 8) g/cm3 (see row #4 in Table 1).

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 4 Radiation hydrodynamic simulations.

Results of one-dimensional radiation-hydrodynamic simulations using the HYDRA code illustrating the implosion dynamics of the beryllium shell. These simulations are tuned to reproduce the observed timing of radiography experiment N160801-001-999 (see also Extended Data Fig. 5a). (a) Simulation results for the evolution of the mass density and (b) a zoom-in for the behaviour close to stagnation. Panels (c) and (d) show radial profiles of mass density and temperature for different times near stagnation, respectively. The target geometry and the hohlraum radiation driving the implosion are shown in Fig. 1. The simulation predicts the highest core compression and peak x-ray emission at t0 = 17.9 ns. About 1 ns earlier, the main shock reaches the centre of the shell. As it is reflected and travels outwards, it sweeps up the in-falling shell material resulting in compression to mass densities of several 10s of g/cm3 and a substantial temperature increase. Based on these simulations, and consistent with the observation from the XRTS, the lower density tail of in-falling beryllium shell is minimized between 500 and 800 ps after peak x-ray emission.Note that this Be implosion design is very different from optimized high-performance implosions with deuterium-tritium (DT) fuel layers that aim for creating a burning plasma24. Specifically, the Be shell is at a much higher adiabat (pressure over related Fermi pressure due to an elevated temperature) because (i) shocks are mistimed as shock timing was optimized for a corresponding experiment with a DT ice layer on the inside of the shell and (ii) the shell has no pre-heat shielding layer (usually made of Cu-doped Be near the inside surface). In addition, the implosion velocity is intentionally reduced by almost twofold to 200 km/s in order to reduce x-ray background signals for the XRTS measurements. All these facts contribute to an approximately tenfold reduced compression compared to what can be achieved in optimized layered implosions where the DT fuel reaches densities of 500 g/cm3 and beyond.

Extended Data Fig. 5 Raw data from radiography measurements near stagnation.

Radiography data for two implosion experiments using the 2D-ConA platform34 with (a) an Fe He-α area backlighter (6.7 keV) and (b) a Cu backlighter (8.4 keV). These measurements cover the probe times used for X-ray Thomson scattering measurements (18.2–18.7 ns). Peak x-ray emission (t0) was observed at 17.88 ns and 17.91 ns for N160801 and N170214, respectively12. The measurements use multi-pinhole (dph = 20 μm) imaging at 6 times magnification and capture about 40 images with 100 ps integration time on 4 multi-channel plate strips that are individually timed. Each strip covers a time period of 230 ps as indicated below the strips. The shell is initially held by a gold cone (cf. Fig. 1(g)), that is located on the right-hand side of the images, about 900 μm from the centre of the shell. The field of view of each of the frames is about 800 × 800 μm2. Except for the backlighter material, the targets were identical within assembly tolerances and the experiments used the same laser drive request. The data demonstrate very good shot-to-shot repeatability in terms of implosion timing and shape of the imploded shell material.

Supplementary information

Source data

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Döppner, T., Bethkenhagen, M., Kraus, D. et al. Observing the onset of pressure-driven K-shell delocalization. Nature 618, 270–275 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-05996-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-05996-8

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing