Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Rethinking mechanisms, diagnosis and management of endometriosis


Endometriosis is a chronic inflammatory disease defined as the presence of endometrial tissue outside the uterus, which causes pelvic pain and infertility. This disease should be viewed as a public health problem with a major effect on the quality of life of women as well as being a substantial economic burden. In light of the considerable progress with diagnostic imaging (for example, transvaginal ultrasound and MRI), exploratory laparoscopy should no longer be used to diagnose endometriotic lesions. Instead, diagnosis of endometriosis should be based on a structured process involving the combination of patient interviews, clinical examination and imaging. Notably, a diagnosis of endometriosis often leads to immediate surgery. Therefore, rethinking the diagnosis and management of endometriosis is warranted. Instead of assessing endometriosis on the day of the diagnosis, gynaecologists should consider the patient’s ‘endometriosis life’. Medical treatment is the first-line therapeutic option for patients with pelvic pain and no desire for immediate pregnancy. In women with infertility, careful consideration should be made regarding whether to provide assisted reproductive technologies prior to performing endometriosis surgery. Modern endometriosis management should be individualized with a patient-centred, multi-modal and interdisciplinary integrated approach.

Key points

  • Endometriosis is a chronic, inflammatory, hormonal, immune, systemic and heterogeneous disease with three different phenotypes (superficial, ovarian endometrioma and deep infiltrating endometriosis), which is associated with adenomyosis in 30% of patients.

  • Diagnosis of endometriosis (and adenomyosis) should be based on patient interviews, examination and imaging; endometriosis diagnosis should no longer be considered synonymous with immediate surgery.

  • Modern management of endometriosis should be patient focused rather than focused on the endometriotic lesions; medical treatment can be administered without histological confirmation.

  • Pain symptoms should be treated without delay to avoid central sensitization, as this can become autonomous, occurring independently of the peripheral stimulus, and can explain coexisting chronic pain syndromes.

  • Medical treatment should be the first therapeutic option for patients with pelvic pain who have no immediate desire for pregnancy; assisted reproductive technologies can be performed without previous surgery for selected patients with infertility.

  • Endometriosis management should be individualized according to the patient’s intentions and priorities; management strategies can vary from country to country as pain perception and health-care systems differ around the world.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: The heterogeneous characteristics of endometriosis and adenomyosis.
Fig. 2: The concept of ‘endometriosis life’.
Fig. 3: Imaging of endometriosis and adenomyosis by TVUS.
Fig. 4: Imaging of endometriosis and adenomyosis by MRI.
Fig. 5: Endometriosis management algorithm for patients without an immediate desire for pregnancy.
Fig. 6: Approaches for management of endometriosis.


  1. 1.

    Sampson, J. A. Peritoneal endometriosis due to premenstrual dissemination of endometrial tissue into the peritoneal cavity. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 14, 422–469 (1927).

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Giudice, L. C. & Kao, L. C. Endometriosis. Lancet 364, 1789–1799 (2004).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Berkley, K. J., Rapkin, A. J. & Papka, R. E. The pains of endometriosis. Science 308, 1587–1589 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    de Ziegler, D., Borghese, B. & Chapron, C. Endometriosis and infertility: pathophysiology and management. Lancet 376, 730–738 (2010).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Hurd, W. W. Criteria that indicate endometriosis is the cause of chronic pelvic pain. Obstet. Gynecol. 92, 1029–1032 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Hammerli, S. et al. Does endometriosis affect sexual activity and satisfaction of the man partner? a comparison of partners from women diagnosed with endometriosis and controls. J. Sex. Med. 15, 853–865 (2018).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Simoens, S. et al. The burden of endometriosis: costs and quality of life of women with endometriosis and treated in referral centres. Hum. Reprod. 27, 1292–1299 (2012).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Nnoaham, K. E. et al. Impact of endometriosis on quality of life and work productivity: a multicenter study across ten countries. Fertil. Steril. 96, 366–373.e8 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Pluchino, N. et al. Sexual function in endometriosis patients and their partners: effect of the disease and consequences of treatment. Hum. Reprod. Update 22, 762–774 (2016).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Chen, L. C. et al. Risk of developing major depression and anxiety disorders among women with endometriosis: a longitudinal follow-up study. J. Affect. Disord. 190, 282–285 (2016).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Ramin-Wright, A. et al. Fatigue - a symptom in endometriosis. Hum. Reprod. 33, 1459–1465 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Fourquet, J., Baez, L., Figueroa, M., Iriarte, R. I. & Flores, I. Quantification of the impact of endometriosis symptoms on health-related quality of life and work productivity. Fertil. Steril. 96, 107–112 (2011).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Soliman, A. M. et al. The effect of endometriosis symptoms on absenteeism and presenteeism in the workplace and at home. J. Manag. Care Spec. Pharm. 23, 745–754 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Soliman, A. M., Yang, H., Du, E. X., Kelley, C. & Winkel, C. The direct and indirect costs associated with endometriosis: a systematic literature review. Hum. Reprod. 31, 712–722 (2016).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Chapron, C. et al. Surgery for bladder endometriosis: long-term results and concomitant management of associated posterior deep lesions. Hum. Reprod. 25, 884–889 (2010).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Menni, K., Facchetti, L. & Cabassa, P. Extragenital endometriosis: assessment with MR imaging. A pictorial review. Br. J. Radiol. 89, 20150672 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Chapron, C. et al. Anatomical distribution of deeply infiltrating endometriosis: surgical implications and proposition for a classification. Hum. Reprod. 18, 157–161 (2003).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Redwine, D. B. Ovarian endometriosis: a marker for more extensive pelvic and intestinal disease. Fertil. Steril. 72, 310–315 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Chapron, C. et al. Associated ovarian endometrioma is a marker for greater severity of deeply infiltrating endometriosis. Fertil. Steril. 92, 453–457 (2009).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Revised American Fertility Society classification of endometriosis: 1985. Fertil. Steril. 43, 351-352 (1985).

  21. 21.

    Revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine classification of endometriosis: 1996. Fertil. Steril. 67, 817-821 (1997).

  22. 22.

    Leyendecker, G. et al. Adenomyosis and endometriosis. Re-visiting their association and further insights into the mechanisms of auto-traumatisation. An MRI study. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 291, 917–932 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Pinzauti, S. et al. Transvaginal sonographic features of diffuse adenomyosis in 18-30-year-old nulligravid women without endometriosis: association with symptoms. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 46, 730–736 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Chapron, C. et al. Relationship between the magnetic resonance imaging appearance of adenomyosis and endometriosis phenotypes. Hum. Reprod. 32, 1–9 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Guo, S. W., Mao, X., Ma, Q. & Liu, X. Dysmenorrhea and its severity are associated with increased uterine contractility and overexpression of oxytocin receptor (OTR) in women with symptomatic adenomyosis. Fertil. Steril. 99, 231–240 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Lazzeri, L. et al. Preoperative and postoperative clinical and transvaginal ultrasound findings of adenomyosis in patients with deep infiltrating endometriosis. Reprod. Sci. 21, 1027–1033 (2014).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Kunz, G. et al. Adenomyosis in endometriosis–prevalence and impact on fertility. Evidence from magnetic resonance imaging. Hum. Reprod. 20, 2309–2316 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Vercellini, P. et al. Uterine adenomyosis and in vitro fertilization outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum. Reprod. 29, 964–977 (2014).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Naftalin, J. et al. Is adenomyosis associated with menorrhagia? Hum. Reprod. 29, 473–479 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Iacovides, S., Avidon, I. & Baker, F. C. What we know about primary dysmenorrhea today: a critical review. Hum. Reprod. Update 21, 762–778 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Cheong, Y., Cameron, I. T. & Critchley, H. O. D. Abnormal uterine bleeding. Br. Med. Bull. 123, 103–114 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Kishi, Y. et al. Four subtypes of adenomyosis assessed by magnetic resonance imaging and their specification. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 207, 114.e1-7 (2012).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Vannuccini, S. et al. Potential influence of in utero and early neonatal exposures on the later development of endometriosis. Fertil. Steril. 105, 997–1002 (2016).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Vercellini, P., Vigano, P., Somigliana, E. & Fedele, L. Endometriosis: pathogenesis and treatment. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 10, 261–275 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Chapron, C. et al. Deeply infiltrating endometriosis: pathogenetic implications of the anatomical distribution. Hum. Reprod. 21, 1839–1845 (2006).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Bricou, A., Batt, R. E. & Chapron, C. Peritoneal fluid flow influences anatomical distribution of endometriotic lesions: why Sampson seems to be right. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 138, 127–134 (2008).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Kirschner, P. A. Porous diaphragm syndromes. Chest Surg. Clin. N. Am. 8, 449–472 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Legras, A. et al. Pneumothorax in women of child-bearing age: an update classification based on clinical and pathologic findings. Chest 145, 354–360 (2014).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Batt, R. E. et al. Mullerianosis. Histol. Histopathol. 22, 1161–1166 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Batt, R. E. & Yeh, J. Mullerianosis: four developmental (embryonic) mullerian diseases. Reprod. Sci. 20, 1030–1037 (2013).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Hufnagel, D., Li, F., Cosar, E., Krikun, G. & Taylor, H. S. The role of stem cells in the etiology and pathophysiology of endometriosis. Semin. Reprod. Med. 33, 333–340 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Jerman, L. F. & Hey-Cunningham, A. J. The role of the lymphatic system in endometriosis: a comprehensive review of the literature. Biol. Reprod. 92, 64 (2015).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Zondervan, K. T. et al. Endometriosis. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 4, 9 (2018).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Samani, E. N. et al. Micrometastasis of endometriosis to distant organs in a murine model. Oncotarget 10, 2282–2291 (2019).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Bulun, S. E. Endometriosis. N. Engl J. Med. 360, 268–279 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Reis, F. M., Petraglia, F. & Taylor, R. N. Endometriosis: hormone regulation and clinical consequences of chemotaxis and apoptosis. Hum. Reprod. Update 19, 406–418 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Stefansson, H. et al. Genetic factors contribute to the risk of developing endometriosis. Hum. Reprod. 17, 555–559 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Treloar, S. A., O'Connor, D. T., O'Connor, V. M. & Martin, N. G. Genetic influences on endometriosis in an Australian twin sample. Fertil. Steril. 71, 701–710 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Saha, R. et al. Heritability of endometriosis. Fertil. Steril. 104, 947–952 (2015).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Rahmioglu, N., Missmer, S. A., Montgomery, G. W. & Zondervan, K. T. Insights into assessing the genetics of endometriosis. Curr. Obstet. Gynecol. Rep. 1, 124–137 (2012).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Rahmioglu, N., Montgomery, G. W. & Zondervan, K. T. Genetics of endometriosis. Womens Health 11, 577–586 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Treloar, S. et al. The international endogene study: a collection of families for genetic research in endometriosis. Fertil. Steril. 78, 679–685 (2002).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Treloar, S. A. et al. Genomewide linkage study in 1,176 affected sister pair families identifies a significant susceptibility locus for endometriosis on chromosome 10q26. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 77, 365–376 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Zondervan, K. T. et al. Significant evidence of one or more susceptibility loci for endometriosis with near-Mendelian inheritance on chromosome 7p13-15. Hum. Reprod. 22, 717–728 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Borghese, B., Zondervan, K. T., Abrao, M. S., Chapron, C. & Vaiman, D. Recent insights on the genetics and epigenetics of endometriosis. Clin. Genet. 91, 254–264 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Buck Louis, G. M. et al. Bisphenol A and phthalates and endometriosis: the endometriosis: natural history, diagnosis and outcomes study. Fertil. Steril. 100, 162–169.e1-2 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Upson, K. et al. Phthalates and risk of endometriosis. Environ. Res. 126, 91–97 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Martinez-Zamora, M. A. et al. Increased levels of dioxin-like substances in adipose tissue in patients with deep infiltrating endometriosis. Hum. Reprod. 30, 1059–1068 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Smarr, M. M., Kannan, K. & Buck Louis, G. M. Endocrine disrupting chemicals and endometriosis. Fertil. Steril. 106, 959–966 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Brosens, I. A. Endometriosis–a disease because it is characterized by bleeding. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 176, 263–267 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Jain, S. & Dalton, M. E. Chocolate cysts from ovarian follicles. Fertil. Steril. 72, 852–856 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Vercellini, P. et al. 'Blood on the Tracks' from corpora lutea to endometriomas. BJOG 116, 366–371 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Laux-Biehlmann, A., d'Hooghe, T. & Zollner, T. M. Menstruation pulls the trigger for inflammation and pain in endometriosis. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 36, 270–276 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Thaker, P. H. et al. Chronic stress promotes tumor growth and angiogenesis in a mouse model of ovarian carcinoma. Nat. Med. 12, 939–944 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    McKinnon, B. D., Bertschi, D., Bersinger, N. A. & Mueller, M. D. Inflammation and nerve fiber interaction in endometriotic pain. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 26, 1–10 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Guo, S. W. Fibrogenesis resulting from cyclic bleeding: the Holy Grail of the natural history of ectopic endometrium. Hum. Reprod. 33, 353–356 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Evers, J. L. H. Is adolescent endometriosis a progressive disease that needs to be diagnosed and treated? Hum. Reprod. 28, 2023 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Fedele, L., Bianchi, S., Zanconato, G., Bettoni, G. & Gotsch, F. Long-term follow-up after conservative surgery for rectovaginal endometriosis. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 190, 1020–1024 (2004).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Zhang, Q., Duan, J., Olson, M., Fazleabas, A. & Guo, S. W. Cellular changes consistent with epithelial-mesenchymal transition and fibroblast-to-myofibroblast transdifferentiation in the progression of experimental endometriosis in baboons. Reprod. Sci. 23, 1409–1421 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Zhang, Q., Duan, J., Liu, X. & Guo, S. W. Platelets drive smooth muscle metaplasia and fibrogenesis in endometriosis through epithelial-mesenchymal transition and fibroblast-to-myofibroblast transdifferentiation. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 428, 1–16 (2016).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Gonzalez-Foruria, I. et al. Dysregulation of the ADAM17/Notch signalling pathways in endometriosis: from oxidative stress to fibrosis. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 23, 488–499 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Borghese, B. et al. Gene expression profile for ectopic versus eutopic endometrium provides new insights into endometriosis oncogenic potential. Mol. Endocrinol. 22, 2557–2562 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Liu, X., Long, Q. & Guo, S. W. Surgical history and the risk of endometriosis: a hospital-based case-control study. Reprod. Sci. 23, 1217–1224 (2016).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Sibiude, J. et al. Association of history of surgery for endometriosis with severity of deeply infiltrating endometriosis. Obstet. Gynecol. 124, 709–717 (2014).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Long, Q., Liu, X. & Guo, S. W. Surgery accelerates the development of endometriosis in mice. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 215, 320.e1–320.e15 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Long, Q., Liu, X., Qi, Q. & Guo, S. W. Chronic stress accelerates the development of endometriosis in mouse through adrenergic receptor β2. Hum. Reprod. 31, 2506–2519 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Streuli, I., Gaitzsch, H., Wenger, J. M. & Petignat, P. Endometriosis after menopause: physiopathology and management of an uncommon condition. Climacteric 20, 138–143 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Anaf, V. et al. Pain, mast cells, and nerves in peritoneal, ovarian, and deep infiltrating endometriosis. Fertil. Steril. 86, 1336–1343 (2006).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Anaf, V. et al. Relationship between endometriotic foci and nerves in rectovaginal endometriotic nodules. Hum. Reprod. 15, 1744–1750 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    McKinnon, B. D., Kocbek, V., Nirgianakis, K., Bersinger, N. A. & Mueller, M. D. Kinase signalling pathways in endometriosis: potential targets for non-hormonal therapeutics. Hum. Reprod. Update 22, 382–403 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Woolf, C. J. Central sensitization: implications for the diagnosis and treatment of pain. Pain 152, S2–S15 (2011).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Aredo, J. V., Heyrana, K. J., Karp, B. I., Shah, J. P. & Stratton, P. Relating chronic pelvic pain and endometriosis to signs of sensitization and myofascial pain and dysfunction. Semin. Reprod. Med. 35, 88–97 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Hoffman, D. Central and peripheral pain generators in women with chronic pelvic pain: patient centered assessment and treatment. Curr. Rheumatol. Rev. 11, 146–166 (2015).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Woolf, C. J. & Salter, M. W. Neuronal plasticity: increasing the gain in pain. Science 288, 1765–1769 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    As-Sanie, S. et al. Changes in regional gray matter volume in women with chronic pelvic pain: a voxel-based morphometry study. Pain 153, 1006–1014 (2012).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    As-Sanie, S. et al. Functional connectivity is associated with altered brain chemistry in women with endometriosis-associated chronic pelvic pain. J. Pain. 17, 1–13 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Falcone, T. & Flyckt, R. Clinical management of endometriosis. Obstet. Gynecol. 131, 557–571 (2018).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Howard, F. M. Endometriosis and mechanisms of pelvic pain. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 16, 540–550 (2009).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Khan, K. N. et al. Pelvic pain in women with ovarian endometrioma is mostly associated with coexisting peritoneal lesions. Hum. Reprod. 28, 109–118 (2013).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Odagiri, K. et al. Smooth muscle metaplasia and innervation in interstitium of endometriotic lesions related to pain. Fertil. Steril. 92, 1525–1531 (2009).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Tokushige, N. et al. Nerve fibers in ovarian endometriomas. Fertil. Steril. 94, 1944-1947 (2010).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Zhang, X. et al. Nerve fibres in ovarian endometriotic lesions in women with ovarian endometriosis. Hum. Reprod. 25, 392–397 (2010).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Chapron, C. et al. Deep infiltrating endometriosis: relation between severity of dysmenorrhoea and extent of disease. Hum. Reprod. 18, 760–766 (2003).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Sampson, J. A. Intestinal adenomas of endometrial type: their importance and their relation to ovarian hematomas of endometrial type (perforating hemorrhagic cysts of the ovary). Arch. Surg. 5, 217–280 (1922).

    Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Chapron, C. et al. Ovarian endometrioma: severe pelvic pain is associated with deeply infiltrating endometriosis. Hum. Reprod. 27, 702–711 (2012).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Fauconnier, A. et al. Relation between pain symptoms and the anatomic location of deep infiltrating endometriosis. Fertil. Steril. 78, 719–726 (2002).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Fauconnier, A. & Chapron, C. Endometriosis and pelvic pain: epidemiological evidence of the relationship and implications. Hum. Reprod. Update 11, 595–606 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Vercellini, P. et al. Association between endometriosis stage, lesion type, patient characteristics and severity of pelvic pain symptoms: a multivariate analysis of over 1000 patients. Hum. Reprod. 22, 266–271 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Koninckx, P. R., Meuleman, C., Demeyere, S., Lesaffre, E. & Cornillie, F. J. Suggestive evidence that pelvic endometriosis is a progressive disease, whereas deeply infiltrating endometriosis is associated with pelvic pain. Fertil. Steril. 55, 759–765 (1991).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Raffi, F., Metwally, M. & Amer, S. The impact of excision of ovarian endometrioma on ovarian reserve: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 97, 3146–3154 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Santulli, P. et al. Endometriosis-related infertility: ovarian endometrioma per se is not associated with presentation for infertility. Hum. Reprod. 31, 1765–1775 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Leone Roberti Maggiore, U., Scala, C., Venturini, P. L., Remorgida, V. & Ferrero, S. Endometriotic ovarian cysts do not negatively affect the rate of spontaneous ovulation. Hum. Reprod. 30, 299–307 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Ferrero, S. et al. Second surgery for recurrent unilateral endometriomas and impact on ovarian reserve: a case-control study. Fertil. Steril. 103, 1236–1243 (2015).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Streuli, I. et al. In women with endometriosis anti-Mullerian hormone levels are decreased only in those with previous endometrioma surgery. Hum. Reprod. 27, 3294–3303 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    Muzii, L. et al. Histologic analysis of endometriomas: what the surgeon needs to know. Fertil. Steril. 87, 362–366 (2007).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. 106.

    Gellersen, B. & Brosens, J. J. Cyclic decidualization of the human endometrium in reproductive health and failure. Endocr. Rev. 35, 851–905 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. 107.

    Marcellin, L. et al. Endometriosis also affects the decidua in contact with the fetal membranes during pregnancy. Hum. Reprod. 30, 392–405 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. 108.

    Vannuccini, S. et al. Infertility and reproductive disorders: impact of hormonal and inflammatory mechanisms on pregnancy outcome. Hum. Reprod. Update 22, 104–115 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. 109.

    Zullo, F. et al. Endometriosis and obstetrics complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil. Steril. 108, 667–672.e5 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. 110.

    Lalani, S. et al. Endometriosis and adverse maternal, fetal and neonatal outcomes, a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum. Reprod. 33, 1854–1865 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  111. 111.

    Glavind, M. T., Forman, A., Arendt, L. H., Nielsen, K. & Henriksen, T. B. Endometriosis and pregnancy complications: a Danish cohort study. Fertil. Steril. 107, 160–166 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. 112.

    Nirgianakis, K. et al. Obstetric complications after laparoscopic excision of posterior deep infiltrating endometriosis: a case-control study. Fertil. Steril. 110, 459–466 (2018).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. 113.

    Somigliana, E. et al. Management of endometriosis in the infertile patient. Semin. Reprod. Med. 35, 31–37 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. 114.

    Scala, C. et al. Influence of adenomyosis on pregnancy and perinatal outcomes in women with endometriosis. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 52, 666–671 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. 115.

    Juang, C. M. et al. Adenomyosis and risk of preterm delivery. BJOG 114, 165–169 (2007).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. 116.

    Hashimoto, A. et al. Adenomyosis and adverse perinatal outcomes: increased risk of second trimester miscarriage, preeclampsia, and placental malposition. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 31, 364–369 (2018).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. 117.

    Yamaguchi, A. et al. Risk of preterm birth, low birthweight, and small-for-gestational-age infants in pregnancies with adenomyosis: a cohort study of the Japan Environment and Children’s Study. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 98, 359–364 (2018).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. 118.

    Alberico, D. et al. Potential benefits of pregnancy on endometriosis symptoms. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 230, 182–187 (2018).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. 119.

    Porpora, M. G. et al. Pain and ovarian endometrioma recurrence after laparoscopic treatment of endometriosis: a long-term prospective study. Fertil. Steril. 93, 716–721 (2010).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  120. 120.

    Busacca, M. et al. Determinants of long-term clinically detected recurrence rates of deep, ovarian, and pelvic endometriosis. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 195, 426–432 (2006).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. 121.

    Zaytsev, P. & Taxy, J. B. Pregnancy-associated ectopic decidua. Am. J. Surgical Pathol. 11, 526–530 (1987).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  122. 122.

    McArthur, J. W. & Ulfelder, H. The effect of pregnancy upon endometriosis. Obstet. Gynecol. Surv. 20, 709–733 (1965).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. 123.

    Coccia, M. E., Rizzello, F., Palagiano, A. & Scarselli, G. The effect of the hormonal milieu of pregnancy on deep infiltrating endometriosis: serial ultrasound assessment of changes in size and pattern of deep endometriotic lesions. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 160, 35–39 (2012).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. 124.

    Leone Roberti Maggiore, U. et al. A systematic review on endometriosis during pregnancy: diagnosis, misdiagnosis, complications and outcomes. Hum. Reprod. Update 22, 70–103 (2016).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. 125.

    Sinaii, N. et al. Differences in characteristics among 1,000 women with endometriosis based on extent of disease. Fertil. Steril. 89, 538–545 (2008).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  126. 126.

    Chapron, C. et al. Factors and regional differences associated with endometriosis: a multi-country, case-control study. Adv. Ther. 33, 1385–1407 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  127. 127.

    Ballweg, M. L. Impact of endometriosis on women's health: comparative historical data show that the earlier the onset, the more severe the disease. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 18, 201–221 (2004).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. 128.

    Chapron, C. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and endometriosis: deeply infiltrating endometriosis does not originate from the rectovaginal septum. Gynecol. Obstet. Invest. 53, 204–208 (2002).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  129. 129.

    Chapron, C. et al. Routine clinical examination is not sufficient for the diagnosis and establishing the location of deeply infiltrating endometriosis. J. Am. Assoc. Gynecol. Laparosc. 9, 115–119 (2002).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  130. 130.

    Koninckx, P., Meuleman, C., Oosterlynck, D. & Cornillie, F. Diagnosis of deep endometriosis by clinical examination during menstruation and plasma CA-125 concentration. Fertil. Steril. 65, 280–287 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  131. 131.

    Guerriero, S. et al. Transvaginal ultrasound vs magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing deep infiltrating endometriosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 51, 586–595 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  132. 132.

    Guerriero, S. et al. Systematic approach to sonographic evaluation of the pelvis in women with suspected endometriosis, including terms, definitions and measurements: a consensus opinion from the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 48, 318–332 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  133. 133.

    Van den Bosch, T. & Van Schoubroeck, D. Ultrasound diagnosis of endometriosis and adenomyosis: state of the art. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 51, 16–24 (2018).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  134. 134.

    Guerriero, S. et al. Deep infiltrating endometriosis: comparison between 2-dimensional ultrasonography (US), 3-dimensional US, and magnetic resonance imaging. J. Ultrasound Med. 37, 1511–1521 (2018).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  135. 135.

    Nisenblat, V., Bossuyt, P. M., Farquhar, C., Johnson, N. & Hull, M. L. Imaging modalities for the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2, CD009591 (2016).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  136. 136.

    Van den Bosch, T. et al. A sonographic classification and reporting system for diagnosing adenomyosis. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 53, 576–582 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  137. 137.

    Chapron, C. et al. Severe ureteral endometriosis: the intrinsic type is not so rare after complete surgical exeresis of deep endometriotic lesions. Fertil. Steril. 93, 2115–2120 (2010).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  138. 138.

    Seracchioli, R. et al. Importance of retroperitoneal ureteric evaluation in cases of deep infiltrating endometriosis. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 15, 435–439 (2008).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  139. 139.

    Goncalves, M. O., Podgaec, S., Dias, J. A. Jr., Gonzalez, M. & Abrao, M. S. Transvaginal ultrasonography with bowel preparation is able to predict the number of lesions and rectosigmoid layers affected in cases of deep endometriosis, defining surgical strategy. Hum. Reprod. 25, 665–671 (2010).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  140. 140.

    Piketty, M. et al. Preoperative work-up for patients with deeply infiltrating endometriosis: transvaginal ultrasonography must definitely be the first-line imaging examination. Hum. Reprod. 24, 602–607 (2009).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  141. 141.

    Ling, F. W. Randomized controlled trial of depot leuprolide in patients with chronic pelvic pain and clinically suspected endometriosis. Pelvic Pain Study Group. Obstet. Gynecol. 93, 51–58 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  142. 142.

    Petraglia, F. et al. Reduced pelvic pain in women with endometriosis: efficacy of long-term dienogest treatment. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 285, 167–173 (2012).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  143. 143.

    Vercellini, P. et al. Surgical versus medical treatment for endometriosis-associated severe deep dyspareunia: I. Effect on pain during intercourse and patient satisfaction. Hum. Reprod. 27, 3450–3459 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  144. 144.

    Brown, J., Crawford, T. J., Allen, C., Hopewell, S. & Prentice, A. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for pain in women with endometriosis. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 1, CD004753 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  145. 145.

    Streuli, I. et al. An update on the pharmacological management of endometriosis. Expert. Opin. Pharmacother. 14, 291–305 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  146. 146.

    Santulli, P. et al. MAP kinases and the inflammatory signaling cascade as targets for the treatment of endometriosis? Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 19, 1465–1483 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  147. 147.

    Graziottin, A. The shorter, the better: a review of the evidence for a shorter contraceptive hormone-free interval. Eur. J. Contracept. Reprod. Health Care 21, 93–105 (2016).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  148. 148.

    Ferrero, S., Alessandri, F., Racca, A. & Leone Roberti Maggiore, U. Treatment of pain associated with deep endometriosis: alternatives and evidence. Fertil. Steril. 104, 771–792 (2015).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  149. 149.

    Chapron, C. et al. Oral contraceptives and endometriosis: the past use of oral contraceptives for treating severe primary dysmenorrhea is associated with endometriosis, especially deep infiltrating endometriosis. Hum. Reprod. 26, 2028–2035 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  150. 150.

    Ferrero, S., Evangelisti, G. & Barra, F. Current and emerging treatment options for endometriosis. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 19, 1109–1125 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  151. 151.

    Taylor, H. S. et al. Treatment of endometriosis-associated pain with elagolix, an oral GnRH antagonist. N. Engl. J. Med. 377, 28–40 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  152. 152.

    Vercellini, P. et al. Medical treatment of endometriosis-related pain. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 51, 68–91 (2018).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  153. 153.

    Vercellini, P. et al. Estrogen-progestins and progestins for the management of endometriosis. Fertil. Steril. 106, 1552–1571.e2 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  154. 154.

    Brown, J., Pan, A. & Hart, R. J. Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues for pain associated with endometriosis. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 12, CD008475 (2010).

  155. 155.

    Olive, D. L. Optimizing gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist therapy in women with endometriosis. Treat. Endocrinol. 3, 83–89 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  156. 156.

    DiVasta, A. D. et al. Hormonal add-back therapy for females treated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist for endometriosis: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet. Gynecol. 126, 617–627 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  157. 157.

    Seracchioli, R. et al. Long-term oral contraceptive pills and postoperative pain management after laparoscopic excision of ovarian endometrioma: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil. Steril. 94, 464–471 (2010).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  158. 158.

    Vercellini, P. et al. Comparison of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device versus expectant management after conservative surgery for symptomatic endometriosis: a pilot study. Fertil. Steril. 80, 305–309 (2003).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  159. 159.

    Tanmahasamut, P. et al. Postoperative levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system for pelvic endometriosis-related pain: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet. Gynecol. 119, 519–526 (2012).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  160. 160.

    Vercellini, P. et al. Postoperative oral contraceptive exposure and risk of endometrioma recurrence. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 198, 504.e1-5 (2008).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  161. 161.

    Takamura, M. et al. Post-operative oral contraceptive use reduces the risk of ovarian endometrioma recurrence after laparoscopic excision. Hum. Reprod. 24, 3042–3048 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  162. 162.

    Seracchioli, R. et al. Long-term cyclic and continuous oral contraceptive therapy and endometrioma recurrence: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil. Steril. 93, 52–56 (2010).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  163. 163.

    Lee, D. Y., Bae, D. S., Yoon, B. K. & Choi, D. Post-operative cyclic oral contraceptive use after gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist treatment effectively prevents endometrioma recurrence. Hum. Reprod. 25, 3050–3054 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  164. 164.

    Cucinella, G. et al. Oral contraceptives in the prevention of endometrioma recurrence: does the different progestins used make a difference? Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 288, 821–827 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  165. 165.

    Sulak, P. J., Kuehl, T. J., Ortiz, M. & Shull, B. L. Acceptance of altering the standard 21-day/7-day oral contraceptive regimen to delay menses and reduce hormone withdrawal symptoms. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 186, 1142–1149 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  166. 166.

    Allaire, C. et al. An interdisciplinary approach to endometriosis-associated persistent pelvic pain. J. Endometr. Pelvic Pain Disord. 9, 77–86 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  167. 167.

    Vercellini, P. et al. Surgery for endometriosis-associated infertility: a pragmatic approach. Hum. Reprod. 24, 254–269 (2009).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  168. 168.

    Vercellini, P. et al. The effect of surgery for symptomatic endometriosis: the other side of the story. Hum. Reprod. Update 15, 177–188 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  169. 169.

    Carmona, F. et al. Does the learning curve of conservative laparoscopic surgery in women with rectovaginal endometriosis impair the recurrence rate? Fertil. Steril. 92, 868–875 (2009).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  170. 170.

    Busacca, M. et al. Postsurgical ovarian failure after laparoscopic excision of bilateral endometriomas. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 195, 421–425 (2006).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  171. 171.

    Lessey, B. A. et al. Ovarian endometriosis and infertility: in vitro fertilization (IVF) or surgery as the first approach? Fertil. Steril. 110, 1218–1226 (2018).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  172. 172.

    Parker, J. D. et al. Persistence of dysmenorrhea and nonmenstrual pain after optimal endometriosis surgery may indicate adenomyosis. Fertil. Steril. 86, 711–715 (2006).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  173. 173.

    Somigliana, E. & Garcia-Velasco, J. A. Treatment of infertility associated with deep endometriosis: definition of therapeutic balances. Fertil. Steril. 104, 764–770 (2015).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  174. 174.

    Bendifallah, S. et al. Colorectal endometriosis-associated infertility: should surgery precede ART? Fertil. Steril. 108, 525–531.e4 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  175. 175.

    Bianchi, P. H. et al. Extensive excision of deep infiltrative endometriosis before in vitro fertilization significantly improves pregnancy rates. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 16, 174–180 (2009).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  176. 176.

    Rossi, A. C. & Prefumo, F. The effects of surgery for endometriosis on pregnancy outcomes following in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 294, 647–655 (2016).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  177. 177.

    Maignien, C. et al. Prognostic factors for assisted reproductive technology in women with endometriosis-related infertility. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 216, 280.e1–280.e9 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  178. 178.

    Coughlan, C. et al. Recurrent implantation failure: definition and management. Reprod. Biomed. Online 28, 14–38 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  179. 179.

    Littman, E. et al. Role of laparoscopic treatment of endometriosis in patients with failed in vitro fertilization cycles. Fertil. Steril. 84, 1574–1578 (2005).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  180. 180.

    Soriano, D. et al. Fertility outcome of laparoscopic treatment in patients with severe endometriosis and repeated in vitro fertilization failures. Fertil. Steril. 106, 1264–1269 (2016).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  181. 181.

    D'Hooghe, T. M., Denys, B., Spiessens, C., Meuleman, C. & Debrock, S. Is the endometriosis recurrence rate increased after ovarian hyperstimulation? Fertil. Steril. 86, 283–290 (2006).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  182. 182.

    van der Houwen, L. E. et al. Efficacy and safety of intrauterine insemination in patients with moderate-to-severe endometriosis. Reprod. Biomed. Online 28, 590–598 (2014).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  183. 183.

    Harb, H. M., Gallos, I. D., Chu, J., Harb, M. & Coomarasamy, A. The effect of endometriosis on in vitro fertilisation outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG 120, 1308–1320 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  184. 184.

    Hamdan, M., Omar, S. Z., Dunselman, G. & Cheong, Y. Influence of endometriosis on assisted reproductive technology outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet. Gynecol. 125, 79–88 (2015).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  185. 185.

    Barbosa, M. A. et al. Impact of endometriosis and its staging on assisted reproduction outcome: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 44, 261–278 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  186. 186.

    Barnhart, K., Dunsmoor-Su, R. & Coutifaris, C. Effect of endometriosis on in vitro fertilization. Fertil. Steril. 77, 1148–1155 (2002).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  187. 187.

    Gupta, S., Agarwal, A., Agarwal, R. & Loret de Mola, J. R. Impact of ovarian endometrioma on assisted reproduction outcomes. Reprod. Biomed. Online 13, 349–360 (2006).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  188. 188.

    Hamdan, M., Dunselman, G., Li, T. C. & Cheong, Y. The impact of endometrioma on IVF/ICSI outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum. Reprod. Update 21, 809–825 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  189. 189.

    Yang, C., Geng, Y., Li, Y., Chen, C. & Gao, Y. Impact of ovarian endometrioma on ovarian responsiveness and IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod. Biomed. Online 31, 9–19 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  190. 190.

    Bourdon, M. et al. Endometriosis and ART: a prior history of surgery for OMA is associated with a poor ovarian response to hyperstimulation. PLOS ONE 13, e0202399 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  191. 191.

    Younes, G. & Tulandi, T. Effects of adenomyosis on in vitro fertilization treatment outcomes: a meta-analysis. Fertil. Steril. 108, 483–490.e3 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  192. 192.

    Vercellini, P. et al. Adenomyosis and reproductive performance after surgery for rectovaginal and colorectal endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod. Biomed. Online 28, 704–713 (2014).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  193. 193.

    Sallam, H. N., Garcia-Velasco, J. A., Dias, S. & Arici, A. Long-term pituitary down-regulation before in vitro fertilization (IVF) for women with endometriosis. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 1, CD004635 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  194. 194.

    de Ziegler, D. et al. Use of oral contraceptives in women with endometriosis before assisted reproduction treatment improves outcomes. Fertil. Steril. 94, 2796–2799 (2010).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  195. 195.

    Drakopoulos, P. et al. Does the type of GnRH analogue used, affect live birth rates in women with endometriosis undergoing IVF/ICSI treatment, according to the rAFS stage? Gynecol. Endocrinol. 34, 884–889 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  196. 196.

    Pabuccu, R., Onalan, G. & Kaya, C. GnRH agonist and antagonist protocols for stage I-II endometriosis and endometrioma in in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. Fertil. Steril. 88, 832–839 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  197. 197.

    Rodriguez-Purata, J. et al. Endometriosis and IVF: are agonists really better? Analysis of 1180 cycles with the propensity score matching. Gynecol. Endocrinol. 29, 859–862 (2013).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  198. 198.

    Bourdon, M. et al. Does GnRH agonist triggering control painful symptom scores during assisted reproductive technology? a retrospective study. Reprod. Sci. 24, 1325–1333 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  199. 199.

    Bourdon, M. et al. The deferred embryo transfer strategy improves cumulative pregnancy rates in endometriosis-related infertility: a retrospective matched cohort study. PLOS ONE 13, e0194800 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  200. 200.

    Benaglia, L. et al. IVF and endometriosis-related symptom progression: insights from a prospective study. Hum. Reprod. 26, 2368–2372 (2011).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  201. 201.

    Santulli, P. et al. Endometriosis-related infertility: assisted reproductive technology has no adverse impact on pain or quality-of-life scores. Fertil. Steril. 105, 978–987.e4 (2016).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  202. 202.

    van der Houwen, L. E. et al. Efficacy and safety of IVF/ICSI in patients with severe endometriosis after long-term pituitary down-regulation. Reprod. Biomed. Online 28, 39–46 (2014).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  203. 203.

    Villette, C. et al. Risks of tubo-ovarian abscess in cases of endometrioma and assisted reproductive technologies are both under- and overreported. Fertil. Steril. 106, 410–415 (2016).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  204. 204.

    Pandey, S., Shetty, A., Hamilton, M., Bhattacharya, S. & Maheshwari, A. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from IVF/ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum. Reprod. Update 18, 485–503 (2012).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  205. 205.

    Palomba, S., Homburg, R., Santagni, S., La Sala, G. B. & Orvieto, R. Risk of adverse pregnancy and perinatal outcomes after high technology infertility treatment: a comprehensive systematic review. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 14, 76 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  206. 206.

    Qin, J., Liu, X., Sheng, X., Wang, H. & Gao, S. Assisted reproductive technology and the risk of pregnancy-related complications and adverse pregnancy outcomes in singleton pregnancies: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Fertil. Steril. 105, 73–85.e1-6 (2016).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  207. 207.

    Qin, J. et al. Pregnancy-related complications and adverse pregnancy outcomes in multiple pregnancies resulting from assisted reproductive technology: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Fertil. Steril. 103, 1492–1508.e1-7 (2015).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  208. 208.

    Martinez, F., International Society for Fertility Preservation–ESHRE–ASRM Expert Working Group. Update on fertility preservation from the Barcelona International Society for Fertility Preservation-ESHRE-ASRM 2015 expert meeting: indications, results and future perspectives. Fertil. Steril. 108, 407–415.e11 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  209. 209.

    Elizur, S. E. et al. Cryopreservation of oocytes in a young woman with severe and symptomatic endometriosis: a new indication for fertility preservation. Fertil. Steril. 91 293.e1-3 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  210. 210.

    Oktay, K. & Oktem, O. Ovarian cryopreservation and transplantation for fertility preservation for medical indications: report of an ongoing experience. Fertil. Steril. 93, 762–768 (2010).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  211. 211.

    Garcia-Velasco, J. A. et al. Five years' experience using oocyte vitrification to preserve fertility for medical and nonmedical indications. Fertil. Steril. 99, 1994–1999 (2013).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  212. 212.

    Cobo, A., Garcia-Velasco, J., Domingo, J., Pellicer, A. & Remohi, J. Elective and onco-fertility preservation: factors related to IVF outcomes. Hum. Reprod. 33, 2222–2231 (2018).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  213. 213.

    Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Treatment of pelvic pain associated with endometriosis: a committee opinion. Fertil. Steril. 101, 927–935 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  214. 214.

    Leyland, N., Casper, R., Laberge, P., Singh, S. S. & SOGC. Endometriosis: diagnosis and management. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can. 32, S1–S32 (2010).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  215. 215.

    American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG: Practice bulletin no. 114: Management of endometriosis. Obstet. Gynecol. 116, 223–236 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  216. 216.

    Johnson, N. P. & Hummelshoj, L. World Endometriosis Society Montpellier, C. Consensus on current management of endometriosis. Hum. Reprod. 28, 1552–1568 (2013).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  217. 217.

    Dunselman, G. A. et al. ESHRE guideline: management of women with endometriosis. Hum. Reprod. 29, 400–412 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  218. 218.

    National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Diagnosis and management of endometriosis: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ 358, 4227 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  219. 219.

    Hudelist, G. et al. Combination of transvaginal sonography and clinical examination for preoperative diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis. Hum. Reprod. 24, 1018–1024 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  220. 220.

    Nnoaham, K. E. et al. Developing symptom-based predictive models of endometriosis as a clinical screening tool: results from a multicenter study. Fertil. Steril. 98, 692–701.e5 (2012).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  221. 221.

    Lafay Pillet, M. C. et al. A clinical score can predict associated deep infiltrating endometriosis before surgery for an endometrioma. Hum. Reprod. 29, 1666–1676 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  222. 222.

    Soliman, A. M., Fuldeore, M. & Snabes, M. C. Factors associated with time to endometriosis diagnosis in the United States. J. Womens Health 26, 788–797 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  223. 223.

    Abrao, M. S. et al. Deep endometriosis infiltrating the recto-sigmoid: critical factors to consider before management. Hum. Reprod. Update 21, 329–339 (2015).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  224. 224.

    Murta, M. et al. Endometriosis does not affect live birth rates of patients submitted to assisted reproduction techniques: analysis of the latin american network registry database from 1995 to 2011. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 35, 1395–1399 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  225. 225.

    Garcia-Velasco, J. A. & Arici, A. Surgery for the removal of endometriomas before in vitro fertilization does not increase implantation and pregnancy rates. Fertil. Steril. 81, 1206 (2004).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  226. 226.

    Ballester, M. et al. Cumulative pregnancy rate after ICSI-IVF in patients with colorectal endometriosis: results of a multicentre study. Hum. Reprod. 27, 1043–1049 (2012).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  227. 227.

    AlKudmani, B. et al. In vitro fertilization success rates after surgically treated endometriosis and effect of time interval between surgery and in vitro fertilization. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 25, 99–104 (2018).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  228. 228.

    Huang, X. W., Qiao, J., Xia, E. L., Ma, Y. M. & Wang, Y. Effect of interval after surgery on in vitro fertilization/ intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes in patients with stage III/IV endometriosis. Chin. Med. J. 123, 2176–2180 (2010).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  229. 229.

    Somigliana, E. et al. Effect of delaying post-operative conception after conservative surgery for endometriosis. Reprod. Biomed. Online 20, 410–415 (2010).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  230. 230.

    Vercellini, P. et al. The effect of second-line surgery on reproductive performance of women with recurrent endometriosis: a systematic review. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 88, 1074–1082 (2009).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  231. 231.

    Mathews, T. J. & Hamilton, B. E. Mean age of mothers is on the rise: United States, 2000-2014. NCHS Data Briefs 232, 1-8 (2016).

  232. 232.

    Burney, R. O. et al. Gene expression analysis of endometrium reveals progesterone resistance and candidate susceptibility genes in women with endometriosis. Endocrinology 148, 3814–3826 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  233. 233.

    Kao, L. C. et al. Expression profiling of endometrium from women with endometriosis reveals candidate genes for disease-based implantation failure and infertility. Endocrinology 144, 2870–2881 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  234. 234.

    Vercellini, P., Giudice, L. C., Evers, J. L. & Abrao, M. S. Reducing low-value care in endometriosis between limited evidence and unresolved issues: a proposal. Hum. Reprod. 30, 1996–2004 (2015).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  235. 235.

    Gordts, S., Brosens, J. J., Fusi, L., Benagiano, G. & Brosens, I. Uterine adenomyosis: a need for uniform terminology and consensus classification. Reprod. Biomed. Online 17, 244–248 (2008).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  236. 236.

    Levgur, M., Abadi, M. A. & Tucker, A. Adenomyosis: symptoms, histology, and pregnancy terminations. Obstet. Gynecol. 95, 688–691 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  237. 237.

    Van den Bosch, T. et al. Terms, definitions and measurements to describe sonographic features of myometrium and uterine masses: a consensus opinion from the Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) group. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 46, 284–298 (2015).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  238. 238.

    Chapron, C. et al. Relationship between the magnetic resonance imaging appearance of adenomyosis and endometriosis phenotypes. Hum. Reprod. 32, 1393–1401 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  239. 239.

    Bazot, M. & Darai, E. Role of transvaginal sonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of uterine adenomyosis. Fertil. Steril. 109, 389–397 (2018).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  240. 240.

    Vannuccini, S. et al. Pathogenesis of adenomyosis: an update on molecular mechanisms. Reprod. Biomed. Online 35, 592–601 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  241. 241.

    Benagiano, G., Brosens, I. & Habiba, M. Structural and molecular features of the endomyometrium in endometriosis and adenomyosis. Hum. Reprod. Update 20, 386–402 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  242. 242.

    Nelsen, L. M. et al. Experience of symptoms and disease impact in patients with adenomyosis. Patient 11, 319–328 (2018).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  243. 243.

    Pearce, C. L. et al. Association between endometriosis and risk of histological subtypes of ovarian cancer: a pooled analysis of case-control studies. Lancet Oncol. 13, 385–394 (2012).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  244. 244.

    Guo, S. W. Endometriosis and ovarian cancer: potential benefits and harms of screening and risk-reducing surgery. Fertil. Steril. 104, 813–830 (2015).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  245. 245.

    Kim, H. S., Kim, T. H., Chung, H. H. & Song, Y. S. Risk and prognosis of ovarian cancer in women with endometriosis: a meta-analysis. Br. J. Cancer 110, 1878–1890 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  246. 246.

    Wentzensen, N. et al. Ovarian cancer risk factors by histologic subtype: an analysis from the ovarian cancer cohort consortium. J. Clin. Oncol. 34, 2888–2898 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  247. 247.

    Vercellini, P. et al. The 'incessant menstruation' hypothesis: a mechanistic ovarian cancer model with implications for prevention. Hum. Reprod. 26, 2262–2273 (2011).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  248. 248.

    Somigliana, E. et al. Risks of conservative management in women with ovarian endometriomas undergoing IVF. Hum. Reprod. Update 21, 486–499 (2015).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  249. 249.

    Borghese, B. et al. Low birth weight is strongly associated with the risk of deep infiltrating endometriosis: results of a 743 case-control study. PLOS ONE 10, e0117387 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  250. 250.

    Vitonis, A. F., Baer, H. J., Hankinson, S. E., Laufer, M. R. & Missmer, S. A. A prospective study of body size during childhood and early adulthood and the incidence of endometriosis. Hum. Reprod. 25, 1325–1334 (2010).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  251. 251.

    Liebermann, C. et al. Maltreatment during childhood: a risk factor for the development of endometriosis? Hum. Reprod. 33, 1449–1458 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  252. 252.

    DiVasta, A. D., Vitonis, A. F., Laufer, M. R. & Missmer, S. A. Spectrum of symptoms in women diagnosed with endometriosis during adolescence vs adulthood. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 218, 324.e1–324.e11 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  253. 253.

    Chapron, C. et al. Questioning patients about their adolescent history can identify markers associated with deep infiltrating endometriosis. Fertil. Steril. 95, 877–881 (2011).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  254. 254.

    Miller, J. A. et al. Prevalence of migraines in adolescents with endometriosis. Fertil. Steril. 109, 685–690 (2018).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  255. 255.

    Vigano, P. et al. Principles of phenomics in endometriosis. Hum. Reprod. Update 18, 248–259 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  256. 256.

    Kvaskoff, M. et al. Endometriosis: a high-risk population for major chronic diseases? Hum. Reprod. Update 21, 500–516 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  257. 257.

    Santulli, P. et al. Increased rate of spontaneous miscarriages in endometriosis-affected women. Hum. Reprod. 31, 1014–1023 (2016).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors thank staff members for their contribution to the multidisciplinary management and clinical research of endometriotic patients: (i) Gynecological Surgery: H. Foulot, A. Bourret, P. Marzouk, G. Pierre, M. C. Lafay-Pillet, F. Decuypere, L. Campin and M. C. Lamau; (ii) Gynecological Endocrinology: G. Plu-Bureau, L. Maitrot-Mantelet and J. Hugon-Rodin; (iii) Assisted Reproductive Technology: M. Bourdon, C. Maignien, S. Eskenazi and F. Kefelian; (iv) Reproductive Biology: J. P. Wolf, C. Patrat, K. Pocate-Cheriet and C. Chalas; (v) Obstetrics: F. Goffinet; (vi) Intestinal Surgery: B. Dousset, S. Gaujoux, and M. Leconte; (vii) Urological Surgery: M. Peyromaure and N. Barry Delongchamps; (viii) Thoracic Surgery: M. Alifano; (ix) Radiology: A. E. Millischer, C. Bordonne and F. Bourret-Cassaigne; (x) Pathology: B. Terris, M. C. Vacher-Lavenu and P. A. Just; (xi) Pelvic Pain Center : S. Perrot; (xii) Psychologist: V. Antoine; (xiii) Epidemiology: P. Y. Ancel; (xiv) Biochemistry: D. Borderie and (xv) Paramedical Staff : K. Hillion, M. Meno, S. Odic and V. Blanchet. The authors also wish to thank F. Batteux, S. Chouzenoux and their team and D. Vaiman and his team (Development, Reproduction and Cancer, Institut Cochin, INSERM U1016, Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France) for their collaboration in the scientific research.

Author information




C.C. supervised the project. All of the authors researched data for the article, substantially contributed to discussions of the content and wrote the article. C.C. and P.S. carried out the review and editing of the mauscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles Chapron.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Until recently, C.C was the president of the Society of Endometriosis Disorders (SEUD) and of the Society of Gynecological and Pelvic Surgery (SCGP). Over the past 3 years, C.C. has been a consultant for AbbVie, Bayer, Gedeon Richter and Ipsen. P.S. has been a consultant for Gedeon Richter and Ipsen. L.M. has been a consultant for Ipsen. B.B. has no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

Additional information

Peer review information

Nature Reviews Endocrinology thanks S. Ferrero, K. Koga and P. Rogers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.



The dilatation of the renal pelvis and/or calyces and ureter as a result of obstruction.


Fibrous bands of scar-like tissue that form between tissues and organs, connecting structures that are not normally connected.


Menstrual periods with abnormally heavy or prolonged bleeding.


Uterine bleeding at irregular intervals, particularly between the expected menstrual periods.

Müllerian metaplasia

Tissues derived from the celomic epithelium, such as the peritoneum, have the potential to differentiate into epithelium and stroma.

Central sensitization

The amplification of pain by the central nervous system.

Myofascial pain

Pain that originates from myofascial trigger points in skeletal muscle, sometimes in seemingly unrelated parts of the body.


Chronic pain that affects the vulvar area and sometimes has no identifiable cause.


Pain during menstruation.

Myometrial hypertonia

Intense and persistent uterine myometrial contraction.

Adnexal masses

Lumps in tissues of the adnexa of the uterus (such as the ovaries and fallopian tubes).

Retroverted uterus

The position of the uterus, tipped backwards so that its fundus is aimed towards the rectum.

Operative laparoscopy

Minimally invasive surgery for therapeutic interventions with a few small cuts in the abdomen.

Fertility preservation

The procedure used to help retain the ability to procreate, including gamete and/or gonad cryopreservation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chapron, C., Marcellin, L., Borghese, B. et al. Rethinking mechanisms, diagnosis and management of endometriosis. Nat Rev Endocrinol 15, 666–682 (2019).

Download citation

Further reading


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing