Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Controlled masking and targeted release of redox-cycling ortho-quinones via a C–C bond-cleaving 1,6-elimination

Abstract

Natural products that contain ortho-quinones show great potential as anticancer agents but have been largely discarded from clinical development because their redox-cycling behaviour results in general systemic toxicity. Here we report conjugation of ortho-quinones to a carrier, which simultaneously masks their underlying redox activity. C-benzylation at a quinone carbonyl forms a redox-inactive benzyl ketol. Upon a specific enzymatic trigger, an acid-promoted, self-immolative C–C bond-cleaving 1,6-elimination mechanism releases the redox-active hydroquinone inside cells. By using a 5-lipoxygenase modulator, β-lapachone, we created cathepsin-B-cleavable quinone prodrugs. We applied the strategy for intracellular release of β-lapachone upon antibody-mediated delivery. Conjugation of protected β-lapachone to Gem-IgG1 antibodies, which contain the variable region of gemtuzumab, results in homogeneous, systemically non-toxic and conditionally stable CD33+-specific antibody–drug conjugates with in vivo efficacy against a xenograft murine model of acute myeloid leukaemia. This protection strategy could allow the use of previously overlooked natural products as anticancer agents, thus extending the range of drugs available for next-generation targeted therapeutics.

Main

The application of new chemical entities with innovative mechanisms of action is necessary for the development of next-generation therapeutics. Natural products are often a source of anticancer agents or act as an inspiration for rational molecular design1,2. However, many natural products identified with medicinal value in vitro remain underexploited due to dose-limiting toxicity in vivo3. Toxicity can stem from low cancer-cell specificity, off-target reactivity or, sometimes, built-in metabolic reactivity of functional groups. Such liabilities can be addressed with prodrug strategies that can mask pharmacophores to prevent secondary pharmacology or accelerated metabolism and can widen the therapeutic window4. Drug targeting strategies can also be useful. For example, antibody-mediated delivery for cancer-cell discrimination has facilitated the use of auristatins, maytansinoids and calicheamicins5. However, some medicinal compounds contain a reactive moiety that cannot be effectively protected by existing chemistry or prodrug strategies. Furthermore, only highly functionalized molecules that contain amine or hydroxyl groups tend to be suitable for conjugation to carriers. Toxic molecules that do not contain such amenable functional groups are often discarded if a carrier cannot be attached without laborious synthetic derivatization. Therefore, improvements in protection of functionalities and attachment of drug carriers to alternative functional groups will extend treatment options with already-discovered compounds6,7.

One underused family of cytotoxic natural products is the ortho-quinones. Several low-molecular-weight compounds that contain an ortho-quinone group, such as β-lapachone8, tanshinones (I, IIA, IIB and crypto)9, mansonones A–G10, dunnione11, miltirone12, salvicine13 and caryopteron A14, display wide antiproliferative effects in vitro. For example, β-lapachone (1, Fig. 1a), a natural product from Brazilian lapacho tree bark15 exhibits good efficacy against leukaemias16 and NQO1+ cancers, such as breast17, non-small-cell lung18 and pancreatic19. However, untargeted ortho-quinones have dose-limiting toxicity and metabolic liabilities because of their NQO1-dependent redox-cycling behaviour that results in the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS; Fig. 1a)20. ROS disrupt the function of proteins21 and can lead to irremediable DNA oxidation, PARP1 hyperactivation and cell death22,23. Although this mechanism is of use against cancer cells, systemic propagation of ROS is undesirable and may lead to anaemia and methaemoglobinemia, as observed in clinical trials of 1 (refs. 24,25). Additional ortho-quinone toxicity can result from their ability to react as electrophiles with critical cellular proteins, peptides, nucleic acids or glutathione, which interferes with redox homeostasis26.

Fig. 1: Protection strategy for ortho-quinone-containing compounds.
figure 1

a, Metabolism of ortho-quinones, for example, β-lapachone, 1, which redox cycles between hydroquinone 2 and semiquinone 3 forms. b, This work: acid-dependent self-immolative release of ortho-quinones following enzymatic peptide cleavage. 1,6-Elimination of an aminobenzyl linker results in cleavage of a C–C bond to release an unstable hydroquinone intermediate, which auto-oxidizes into a quinone.

We hypothesized that if delivered to target cells without systemic side effects, ortho-quinones would have substantial potential as a monotherapy or in combination with mainstay anticancer agents27,28. Their metabolic interference may be a potential avenue to tackle malignancies29,30, and a strategy to overcome cancer drug resistance31. Some tumour selectivity of 1 has been reported, as overexpression of oxidoreductase enzymes (for example, NQO1) can increase redox-cycling rates selectively in the tumour32. However, no therapeutic ortho-quinone has yet reached the clinic due to generalized ROS-mediated systemic toxicity. In contrast, para-quinones, such as doxorubicin (Adriamycin), geldanamycin, mitoxantrone and mitomycin C, have lower redox-cycling rates and are successfully used in the clinic22. If the side effects of ortho-quinones could be prevented through selective protection and targeting strategies, this may lead to new cancer treatment options.

Prodrug approaches to mask redox activity and limit side effects of ortho-quinones, such as 1, have been described. Boothman and co-workers developed a number of approaches, including formation of esterase-cleavable hydroquinone alkyl esters33, and pH-sensitive aryl imine, acyl hydrazone, ketal34, aminoalkyl alcohol and amino aromatic phenol prodrugs35. However, the disadvantages of these strategies have prevented their widespread adoption. For example, esters and hydrazones are often too labile under physiological conditions for effective targeting, whereas ketals are not sufficiently labile in tumours34. Modern prodrug strategies and linkers, including those that connect targeting antibodies and their payloads, use enzymatically activatable trigger groups and release drug functionality by means of self-immolative spacers. For example, para-aminobenzyl carbamate linkers release amines and para-aminobenzyl ether linkers release alcohols upon specific protease-triggered hydrolysis36. We hypothesize that a similar strategy is possible for ortho-quinones.

Here we present a modular strategy that uses self-immolative benzyl linkers for protection and controlled release of ortho-quinones. The self-immolative 1,6-elimination of a para-aminobenzyl linker attached at the quinone carbon as a benzyl ketol enables release of the hydroquinone. The released hydroquinone then oxidizes spontaneously to give the desired quinone by using the redox-cycling ability of the payload (Fig. 1b). The strategy is compatible with peptide linkers, such as those activated by the cysteine protease cathepsin B37. In this work, we explore the mechanism and properties of this C–C bond-cleaving elimination and prospectively apply it to protect and target 1 as an antibody–drug conjugate (ADC) for treatment of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML).

Synthesis of self-immolative quinone models

Initially, the synthesis of model derivatives of quinones that fragment upon removal of a protecting group was investigated using 9,10-phenanthrenequinone (PhQ), 4, as a model compound (Fig. 2a). Phenolic alcohol-containing drugs are typically protected as para-aminobenzyl ethers38. However, when we investigated reductive alkylations of 4 with Boc-protected para-aminobenzyl bromide linker 5 (Fig. 2a), with a view to forming O-benzyl derivatives, we instead obtained the C-benzyl derivative Boc-para-aminobenzyl phenanthrene-ketol (Boc-PAB-PhQ), 6, in good yield (60–70%). Indeed, O-benzyl derivatives of hydroquinones have been reported to be unstable and to rearrange to their corresponding C-benzyl isomers39,40. Intrigued by 6, we tested its stability following N-Boc deprotection to give para-aminobenzyl phenanthrene-ketol (PAB-PhQ), 7, which to our surprise appeared to be unstable, and as it was consumed, formation of quinone 4 was observed (Fig. 2b and Supplementary Figs. 1–6).

Fig. 2: Synthesis of para-aminobenzyl phenanthrene-ketol and its elimination characteristics and protection of medicinally relevant ortho-quinones as para-aminobenzyl ketols.
figure 2

a, Sodium-dithionite-mediated reductive alkylation of PhQ, 4, with Boc-para-aminobenzyl bromide 5 in a two-phase water/THF system generates benzyl ketol product 6 in 60–70% yield. Upon deprotection of N-Boc, compound 7 is unstable and eliminates to release quinone 4 and a linker by-product via the hydroquinone intermediate 8. TBAB, tetrabutylammonium bromide. b, Kinetics of consumption of 7 and formation of 4 were measured by 1H NMR spectroscopy in moderately acidic solution (pH ≈ 6). Example 1H NMR aromatic region of 7 following 12 h at rt is shown, compared to freshly formed 7 and to 4. c, Elimination reaction followed by relative area of 1H NMR peaks over 30 h at rt. d, Structures of β-lapachone (BL) 1, 3-hydroxy-β-lapachone (HBL) 11, dunnione (DN) 12 and cryptotanshinone (CTN) 13. e, Protection of ortho-quinones 1, 11, 12 and 13 as benzyl ketol derivatives. Upon deprotection the derivatives eliminate to reform the quinones.

Complete consumption of 7 and formation of 4 was confirmed by 1H NMR spectroscopy. Appearance of 4 proceeded with a half-life (t1/2) of 2.94 ± 0.08 h at 25 °C in a moderately acidic methanolic solution with complete release within 20 h. Data fitting suggested that release followed first-order kinetics and the rate of consumption of 7 (kobs = 6.18 ± 0.12 × 10–5 s–1) was consistent with the rate of formation of product 4 (kobs = 6.55 ± 0.22 × 10–5 s–1; Fig. 2c and Supplementary Figs. 46). Through 1H NMR spectroscopy, we identified the presence of an aminobenzyl side product from the spontaneous reaction of methanolic solvent with an aza-quinone methide generated by self-immolative elimination (Supplementary Figs. 2 and 18). This, and the necessity for aniline deprotection for quinone release, suggests a self-immolative elimination mechanism. Under basic conditions, appearance of 4 was slower (kobs = 1.16 ± 0.18 × 10–6 s–1) and not complete after 40 h (Supplementary Figs. 46), which suggested a pH dependence for the elimination reaction.

We anticipated that self-immolative release might generate an unstable hydroquinone intermediate (8) that could auto-oxidize to the corresponding quinone. 9,10-Phenanthrenediol hydroquinone 8 was not observed when elimination was performed under standard, oxygenated conditions as a result of its instability to auto-oxidation (Supplementary Fig. 2). However, in degassed solvent, intermediate 8 was observed (Supplementary Figs. 16 and 17), which confirms that the transient hydroquinone intermediate exists. Elimination from 7 was also followed by ultraviolet–visible spectroscopic analysis (Supplementary Figs. 2022). Elimination from benzyl ketols, such as 7, in this manner has not been previously documented and thus prompted further investigations.

Generality of C–C bond elimination reaction to ortho-quinones

We next investigated whether the observations described above also applied to additional ortho-quinones. From β-lapachone 1 (Figs. 1a and 2d), N-Boc-protected para-aminobenzyl β-lapa-ketol (Boc-PAB-BL) 9 could be synthesized under identical conditions in similar yield. N-Boc deprotection of 9 gave (PAB-BL) 10, which was observed to be unstable under acidic conditions and eliminated to reform 1 via hydroquinone intermediate 2 (Fig. 2e and Supplementary Figs. 8, 9 and 20).

Three additional medicinal orthoquinones, (±)-3-hydroxy-β-lapachone (HBL) 11, (±)-dunnione (DN) 12 and cryptotanshinone (CTN) 13 (Fig. 3a), were also successfully converted into their corresponding PAB-ketol analogues as diastereoisomeric mixtures (1416; Fig. 2e). In the case of HBL, an intermediate hydroxyl protection and the use of an indium(0)-mediated Barbier reaction were required to achieve Boc-PAB-HBL 11. In all cases, the removal of the Boc protecting group in acidic media led to reformation of their respective ortho-quinone precursors (1719 to 1113; Fig. 2e and Supplementary Figs. 1015). These investigations validated the generality of the methodology for a number of medicinally relevant ortho-quinones with structural similarity to 4.

Fig. 3: Modelling of the mechanism of elimination of para-aminobenzyl ketols.
figure 3

a, Theoretical potential energy surface calculated with PCM(H2O)/M06-2X/6-31+G(d,p) for the elimination of species 7, 10 and 20 along the breaking C–C bond (green). b, General chemical scheme of nine different species denoted as Q (where subscript indicates neutral, cationic, anionic and zwitterionic) that are in equilibrium for the protected and unprotected para-aminobenzyl ketol derivatives in an aqueous solution. Species inside a dashed box (QNH-, QOH+ and QZw1) are those for which an elimination TS structure was found. The equation describes the effect of pH on the observed kinetic rate (kobs) and its derivation is described in the Supplementary Information. c, TS structures for the elimination of reactive species calculated at the same level of theory. Green dashed lines show interatomic distances (in angstroms) for the breaking C–C bond. Colour blue denotes nitrogen, orange denotes oxygen, grey denotes carbon and white denotes hydrogen. Intrinsic first-order kinetic constants (k, k+ and kzw) were calculated from the theoretical activation energies (ΔG in kcal mol–1) at 310 K using the Eyring equation.

Source data

pH-dependent elimination profiles of benzyl ketol derivatives

The mechanism and kinetics of the elimination of model compound PAB-PhQ 7 were investigated. Initially, deprotected (R = H) derivative 7 and a theoretical protected (R = Ac) derivative 20 were compared (Fig. 3a). The energy profile along the breaking C–C bond (green) was calculated quantum mechanically at the PCM(H2O)/M06-2X/6-31+G(d,p) level of theory with the purpose of locating the transition state (TS) structures for the elimination. However, no maximum was detected, indicating that neutral species 7 remained unreactive and did not eliminate, contrasting with the observed release of 4. Comparisons were made with different heteroatom-based leaving groups for the elimination of similar neutral para-amino benzyl species (Supplementary Fig. 106). This showed that reagents with chloride or activated alcohol (mesyl or triflate) leaving groups had low enough activation barriers (7.8–16.9 kcal mol–1) to eliminate. A carbamate leaving group was calculated to have a higher activation barrier (28.1 kcal mol–1). However, carbon-based leaving groups needed three electron-withdrawing groups (CN or NO2) or protonated carbonyl groups to have acceptable activation barriers (15.3–28.1 kcal mol–1) for elimination.

These results suggested that charged species might be necessary to promote the C–C bond elimination reaction. In aqueous solution, several charged species are in equilibrium albeit in various proportions. We considered nine possible charged states for 7 (Fig. 3b). Three of the nine species (7NH–, 7OH+ and 7Zw1) were reactive enough to allow an effective flow of electronic density from the para-amino group to the ketone to promote elimination of the hydroquinone, by either making the former more nucleophilic (NH) or the latter more electrophilic (C = OH+). The activation barriers calculated for these species (ΔGNH– = 11.8 kcal mol–1; ΔGOH+ = 6.5 kcal mol–1; ΔGZw1 ≤ 0.1 kcal mol–1) suggest fast to extremely fast intrinsic elimination rates (Fig. 3c; k = 3.13 × 104 s–1; k+ = 1.70 × 108 s–1; kzw = 5.49 × 1012 s–1). However, the global rate depends on the concentration of these reactive species in solution, which are exceedingly low due to the high pKa values for aniline deprotonation (≥16) and low pKa for carbonyl protonation (≤−2), values well beyond the practical range in aqueous solution. Hence, the theoretical global kinetic constant (ktheo) can be modelled as a function of the intrinsic kinetic constants for each reactive species (kr), the equilibrium constants for all species in solution both reactive and non-reactive (Ki), and pH; this expression for the theoretical rate constant can be related to the experimentally observed rate constant (kobs) (Fig. 3b (equation) and Supplementary Information).

It became apparent that despite many attempted approximations to cancel out some of the terms in the equation, ktheo calculated at different pH values was exceedingly dependent on the equilibrium constants involving the extremely low populated, but very reactive species (KNH–, KOH+ and KZw1), which resulted in erratic pH dependency profiles depending on the numbers used. With no experimental values available for some equilibrium constants, and because tabulated41,42 and calculated values by using different programs such as Marvin 19.19.0 (2019), ChemAxon (https://chemaxon.org) or Epik (Schrodinger Suite)43,44 were not reliable (Supplementary Fig. 109), we decided to examine the elimination reaction kinetics for 7 at different pH values to derive more realistic equilibrium constants by using experimental data.

For N-protected derivative 20, Ac-PAB-PhQ, we also considered nine different species. We found three of them to be reactive, but with higher elimination activation barriers (ΔGNAc– = 24.8 kcal mol−1, ΔGOH+ = 10.7 kcal mol−1, ΔGZw1 = 4.5 kcal mol−1; Fig. 3c, Supplementary Fig. 111 and Supplementary Table 5) relative to those calculated for the unprotected (R = H) derivative 7. The activation barrier for the negatively charged acetanilide (20NAc–) was substantially increased with respect to the deacetylated analogue due to the large decrease in nucleophilicity of the nitrogen lone pair delocalized along the acetyl group. The dramatic obstruction of this reaction channel causes the global elimination rate to slow down by 2–5 orders of magnitude at pH 3–10 (Supplementary Fig. 110). Therefore, as for the widely used para-aminobenzylalcohol linkers45, elimination is self-immolative and faster with free aniline.

For comparison, we also modelled the elimination of the aminobenzyl ketol species derived from the medicinal natural product of most notable interest, β-lapachone, PAB-BL 10 and dunnione, PAB-DN 18 (Supplementary Fig. 111 and Supplementary Table 5). Similarly to PAB-PhQ 7, the neutral species of PAB-BL 10 and PAB-DN 18 were unreactive to elimination. We considered the possible reactive species in a similar manner. An additional species—arising from protonation of the cyclic vinyl ether group—was considered but was calculated to be unreactive. In comparison to unprotected phenanthrenequinone derivative 7, slightly higher activation barriers were obtained for the three charged reactive species of PAB-BL 10GNH– = 13.5 kcal mol−1, ΔGOH+ = 13.5 kcal mol−1, ΔGZw1 = 1.4 kcal mol−1) and PAB-DN 18GNH– = 13.0 kcal mol−1, ΔGOH+ = 14.1 kcal mol−1, ΔGZw1 = 1.6 kcal mol−1) and were noticeably higher for cationic 10OH+ and 18OH+. This increase is due to the reduced aromaticity around the carbonyl groups in 10 and 18, which in turn affects their protonation ability (KOH+). Given the calculated differences in the intrinsic kinetic accessibility to the different reaction channels, and the expected thermodynamic differences in the relative populations of each reactive charged species, it was likely that both PAB-BL 10 and PAB-DN 18 had a slightly different pH-rate dependence relative to 7.

To experimentally validate predictions and determine the pH-rate dependence of the elimination and the critical reaction parameters in aqueous solution, we synthesized models protected with a penicillin-G-amidase-cleavable phenylacetamide group46. Addition of penicillin G amidase to the protected models triggered amide hydrolysis and formation of the desired para-aminobenzyl ketol in neutral aqueous solution (Fig. 4a).

Fig. 4: Experimental analysis of kinetics and pH-rate dependence of elimination.
figure 4

a, Amidase-releasable models to test elimination kinetics in buffered aqueous solution of protected and unprotected benzyl ketol species. b, i: Formation rate of 4 from 21 with and without penicillin G amidase incubation at pH 7.4 and 37 °C. Data are presented as mean values ± s.e.m., n = 3, from one representative experiment. ii: Example HPLC trace showing 7 and 4 after 21 was treated with penicillin G amidase at pH 7.4 and 37 °C. Time = 0 h time point taken 5 min after enzyme addition. c, i: Experimental elimination rate kobs versus pH dependence of elimination of PAB-PhQ 7, PAB-BL 10 and PAB-DN 18, with data presented as calculated kobs value from representative experiment ± 95% confidence interval. Lines represent fitting of the experimental data to theoretical models for kobs. ii: From this fitting, values for intrinsic kinetic (ki) and equilibrium (Ki) constants were derived. aIntrinsic rate constants (ki) calculated from the theoretical activation barriers were fixed during the fitting.

Source data

With this strategy, we showed that at physiological pH and temperature (pH 7.4, 37 °C), formation of PhQ 4 occurred at rate kobs = 1.15 ± 0.66 × 10–5 s–1 following addition of the enzyme to 21. Intermediate 7, PAB-PhQ, could be identified (Fig. 4b and Supplementary Figs. 2426) and elimination of 7 occurred at rate kobs = 9.72 ± 2.88 × 10–6 s–1. Without added enzyme, 21 was stable and formation of 4 negligible. As mentioned above, hydroquinone 8 was not observed by NMR spectroscopic analysis of non-degassed solutions, suggesting that in oxygenated aqueous solution the intermediate has a very short t1/2 relative to that of species 7.

As enzyme-mediated amide hydrolysis was fast (<5 min), immediate kinetic analysis of the subsequent elimination rate was possible without use of acidic or basic deprotection reagents, thus allowing control of pH. Focusing on the phenanthrenequinone, β-lapachone and dunnione derivatives, elimination from 7, 10 and 18 generated enzymatically from 21, 22 and the (R,R/S,S) pair of enantiomers of 23, respectively, was followed across a range of pH values at 37 °C (Fig. 4c and Supplementary Figs. 27 and 38). Reactivity of the quinone products under basic conditions precluded analysis of product formation at pH >10. As predicted computationally, the reaction rate was dependent on pH. Compound 7 tends to show acid-promoted elimination, which peaks at pH 5–6 (kobs pH 6 = 1.7 ± 0.3 × 10–5 s–1). The elimination rate of PAB-BL 10 was even more acid-dependent relative to 7 (Fig. 4c and Supplementary Figs. 3336). Negligible elimination resulting in formation of 1 occurred at pH ≥6 within 72 h (kobs pH 6 = 2.1 ± 0.8 × 10–7 s–1), and the rate peaked at pH 3 (kobs pH 3 = 1.1 ± 0.1 × 10–5 s–1). For the PAB-DN derivative 18, elimination displayed a very similar rate to that of PAB-BL 10 (kobs pH 6 = 7.4 ± 1.1 × 10–7 s–1; kobs pH 3 = 9.1 ± 0.2 × 10–6 s–1; Fig. 4c and Supplementary Figs. 37 and 38).

The kobs derived at different pHs were fitted into the equation shown in Fig. 3b; the calculated ki were used as fixed parameters and the individual Ki values were left as adjustable parameters. A good fit of kobs to the theoretical kinetic model was obtained (7, χ2 = 0.270, R2 = 0.998; 10, χ2 = 4.577, R2 = 0.998; 18, χ2 = 8.726, R2 = 0.994), despite the different pH-dependent profile obtained for quinone derivatives 7, 10 and 18, which reflects the high quality of our kinetic model. The empirically derived equilibrium constants were all within expected ranges, except for the unusually facile deprotonation of the tertiary alcohol (pKO– ≈ 8–12) (Fig. 4c(ii)).

With the calculated rate values, we became interested in the potential applications of the acid-dependent release. Such a profile is unusual because drug release from related para-hydroxybenzyl ether linkers is promoted in basic conditions36.

C-benzylation prevents quinone redox activity

The toxicity of the benzyl ketol pharmacophore generated upon quinone derivatization was investigated to determine the usefulness of the protection strategy for prodrug generation. C-benzylation disrupts the quinone scaffold, so it was expected that the redox-cycling ability of an ortho-quinone and associated undesirable systemic toxicity would be lost upon derivatization. We focused our attention on β-lapachone, the most well-studied medicinal ortho-quinone. Redox activity of a stable, non-releasable model of benzyl β-lapa-ketol, 24, which lacks a para-amino-group necessary for self-immolative release, was compared to parent drug 1, and control non-redox cycling protected 1,4-dioxine derivative 25. Compound 24 was found to be non-redox active in an in vitro redox cycling assay (Fig. 5a and Supplementary Fig. 39) and, unlike 1, did not generate detectable ROS in AML cell line HL-60, a cell line in which H2O2 generation by 1 has been previously reported (Fig. 5b)47. Compound 24 displayed decreased toxicity by >20-fold to a range of cancer cell lines, including leukaemia, breast, colon and cervical cancer (Extended Data Fig. 1b and Supplementary Fig. 42). The IC50 of 24 against HL-60 was unchanged by addition of antioxidant N-acetyl cysteine (NAC; Fig. 5c). This is in stark contrast to 1, for which the IC50 value more than doubled upon NAC addition as NAC alleviated ROS-mediated toxicity. These results together confirm that 24 does not redox cycle.

Fig. 5: C-benzylation prevents redox-cycling of β-lapachone; cathepsin-B-cleavable β-lapachone prodrugs.
figure 5

a, In vitro redox-cycling capability of 1, 24 and 25 measured by phenol red/horseradish peroxidase reporter assay. Relative increase in redox-cycling ability calculated by (A – A0)/A0, where A is absorbance at 610 nm for the test compound and A0 is absorbance at 610 nm for a sample with PBS added only. The redox activity of 1 saturates the assay above 10 μM, but 24 and 25 show no measurable redox activity up to 25 μM. b, Generalized ROS production by compounds 1, 24 and 25 in HL-60 cells measured with the dye 2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate. c, Toxicity to AML cell line HL-60 with and without the ROS quencher NAC (600 mM). IC50 of 24 decreased slightly from 13.6 ± 1.3 µM to 10.5 ± 0.9 µM due to NAC. IC50 of 1 doubled from 0.47 ± 0.26 µM to 1.18 ± 0.18 µM with NAC. d, In vitro 5-LO enzyme target inhibition with and without DTT (1 mM). IC50 of 1 without DTT > 30 µM, with DTT 0.24 ± 0.13 µM. IC50 of 24 without DTT 8.0 ± 2.5 µM, with DTT 10.4 ± 4.1 µM. IC50 of 25 without DTT 11.3 ± 1.1 µM, with DTT 11.5 ± 2.2 µM. e, In vitro methaemoglobin generation measured by absorbance at 630 nm after 1 h incubation with test compounds. f, Cathepsin-B-activatable prodrugs release β-lapachone by linker elimination following enzymatic amide-bond cleavage. g, Release of 1 from 26 at 254 nm after in vitro dipeptide cleavage by protease cathepsin B (MES 20 mM buffer, pH 5). Peaks for PAB-BL 10 and β-lapachone 1 overlap. h, Concentration-dependent methaemoglobin generation by dipeptide prodrugs after 4 h incubation in ovine blood. Methaemoglobin was measured by absorbance at 630 nm following treatment with compounds relative to DMSO control. For ae and h, data show mean ± s.e.m. from one representative experiment (n = 3).

In previous work, we showed that 1 is, cumulatively, an reversible allosteric inhibitor of the 5-lipoxygenase enzyme (5-LO also known as 5-LOX or ALOX5), an enzyme that catalyses the oxidation of arachidonic acid, and that its anticancer activity was dependent on 5-LO expression48. Activity of compounds 24 and 25 against 5-LO was tested. β-Lapachone 1 inhibited 5-LO activity in the presence of the reducing agent dithiothreitol (DTT) that promotes redox cycling and formation of hydroquinone 2. Unlike 1, the inhibition profiles of 24 and 25 were not impacted by addition of DTT (Fig. 5d). Therefore, benzyl ketol β-lapachone derivatives are not strong inhibitors of 5-LO, unlike 1.

Methaemoglobin formation, a major side effect of ortho-quinones in vivo, did not occur for the protected compounds 24 and 25 in an in vitro ovine blood model. In contrast, β-lapachone 1 caused dose-dependent methaemoglobin formation detectable at dose concentrations as low as 10 µM after 1 h of incubation (Fig. 5e, Extended Data Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. 40). Haemolysis of haemoglobin, related to anaemic side effects, was also lower for the protected models (Supplementary Fig. 41). These promising results indicated that the benzyl protection unit, while intact, has the capacity to mitigate the blood-borne redox-mediated side effects of quinones.

Cathepsin B can trigger the release of β-lapachone from dipeptide prodrugs

Confident that the protection strategy produces redox-inactive derivatives, it was next investigated whether the self-immolative linker strategy was compatible with enzymatic cleavage of cathepsin-B-labile dipeptides. Dipeptide units49 Cbz-Val-Cit-, Cbz-Val-Ala- and Cbz-Phe-Cit- were added by sequential amide coupling from deprotected aniline intermediate 10 (26–28, Fig. 5f). After incubation of 26–28 with cathepsin B (Fig. 5g and Supplementary Figs. 5355), compound 1 was observed. Aniline 10 was identified as a common intermediate and release of 1 from 10 occurred as previously observed. The Cbz group was not necessary for cathepsin B action (Supplementary Fig. 56). This demonstrated that the dipeptide-para-aminobenzyl ketols are compatible with cathepsin B, in an identical manner to dipeptide-para-aminobenzyl alcohol and carbamate linkers. Like benzyl model 24, dipeptide prodrugs 26–28 generated less methaemoglobin in blood in an in vitro model relative to 1 (Fig. 5h). Additionally, they generated less methaemoglobin than an acyl-hydroquinone β-lapachone prodrug 29, previously described by Ma et al.33 due to the increased stability of the dipeptide over labile ester bonds.

Cbz dipeptide prodrugs 2628 were fully stable in human serum (Supplementary Figs. 58 and 59) and did not exhibit toxicity to AML cell line MOLM-13 at 5 µM concentration, unlike 1 and derivative 29 (Extended Data Fig. 1c and Supplementary Fig. 57) that achieved complete cell death at this concentration. Compound 26 exhibited 10-fold higher IC50 relative to 1 in AML cell lines HL-60 and MOLM-13 (Supplementary Fig. 57). After lysosomal deacidification (NH4Cl)50 or inhibition (E64d)51, 26 was less toxic, suggesting that acidic compartments help promote toxicity of the prodrug (Extended Data Fig. 1d). It was interesting that with NH4Cl at 30 mM, an increase in toxicity of 1 was seen, a result previously described for menadione52 (Supplementary Fig. 60). Prodrugs 2628 may have suitability for treatment of NQO1+ solid tumours with concurrent overexpression of proteases, for example, cathepsins53,54 and acidic pH55 in the extracellular malignant environment.

β-Lapachone is a promising treatment for AML

In our work, we were particularly interested in testing quinone 1 for the treatment of AML, a cancer for which 1 displays potent toxicity, as described in ref. 48 and confirmed by us on a panel of AML cell lines (Supplementary Fig. 43). AML is the most common form of acute leukaemia among adults56. It is characterized by immature myeloid cell proliferation and bone marrow failure and is a cancer for which new treatments are urgently needed. AML has a poor 5 yr survival rate of 20% and a large proportion of patients relapse57. Interference in redox homeostasis is an appealing treatment angle for AML58. Recent observations note that despite differences between the mechanisms of action of clinically used AML therapeutics, most share oxidative stress as a mediator of the cytotoxic effect59. For example, anthracyclines and arsenic trioxide induce rapid ROS accumulation60,61.

Quinone 1 also has relevant protein targets in AML. As mentioned above, in previous work48, we show that β-lapachone strongly inhibits enzyme 5-LO, an enzyme that is a candidate target for therapeutic targeting of the stem-cell-like blasts in AML62,63. In our experiments, 5-LO gene knock-out (KO), using CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing, impaired proliferation of leukaemia cell line HEL (Supplementary Figs. 4447). Experiments also suggested that KO or shRNA-mediated knockdown (KD) may make AML cells more resistant to 1 (Supplementary Figs. 4552). Both redox sensitivity and 5-LO target relevance made β-lapachone a valuable experimental drug for AML treatment. For AML, the data strongly supports the development of an intracellular targeting strategy to enable application of the quinone prodrugs.

ADCs release β-lapachone in CD33 + AML cells in vivo

Antibody conjugation can enable targeting and assisted delivery of payloads inside AML target cells. We have shown that an ortho-quinone protection strategy can eliminate redox toxicity from 1, and indeed, protection should therefore prevent any potential redox damage to the antibody carrier.

We reasoned that cell killing should depend on effective cellular trafficking of a conjugate to a low-pH cellular compartment inside target cells because pH 4–5 is required for the efficient release of 1 in vitro. Furthermore, in the system described, the slow release of 1 from the quinone protection unit PAB-BL 10 at physiological pH should limit systemic drug release, that is, any linker deconjugated from the antibody while in circulation should not release drug, even if a protecting dipeptide unit is broken. This can limit the toxicity profile of the ortho-quinone to that produced by non-specific cell uptake.

To test this strategy, we designed IgG1 antibodies for payload conjugation with a binding region based on the well-characterized CD33 targeting antibody gemtuzumab64 and synthesized payload linker 30. Linker 30 is equipped with a Val-Cit cleavable moiety, as used in brentuximab vedotin65, and a 3-benzoylacrylic acid conjugation moiety, as previously developed by our group66,67 for site-specific cysteine conjugation (Fig. 6a). By using variants with engineered cysteine mutations, we generated homogeneous conjugates with a drug-antibody ratio (DAR) of 2. Three single-cysteine mutation sites were compared, one in the light chain and two in the heavy chain (Fig. 6b). Complete conversion was achieved for all conjugates. The positioning of the engineered cysteines on the antibody influenced the ease of conjugation. A Gem-HC-239iC mutant with a cysteine introduced in the hinge region of the heavy chain at position 239 offered favourable reactivity over Gem-LC-V205C and Gem-HC-S442C mutants with cysteine residues in more exposed positions on the light chain (Val to Cys mutant at position 205) and heavy chain (Ser to Cys mutant at position 442), respectively. With Gem-HC-239iC, complete conversion was achieved using 20 equivalents of linker per cysteine for 6 h to generate conjugate Gem-HC-239iC-BL. Gem-HC-V205C and Gem-HC-S442C mutants required more equivalents of linker (40 and 30 equivalents per cysteine, respectively) to achieve complete conversion. These conjugates may also be termed antibody–prodrug conjugates (APDCs)68 because they contain a protected payload.

Fig. 6: Gem-HC-239iC-BL has an effect on subcutaneous AML tumour growth and prolongs survival of mice.
figure 6

a, Structure of payload 30 for attachment to antibody through engineered cysteine residues on the antibody. b, IgG1 antibody containing a gemtuzumab variable domain with the three different cysteine mutation sites annotated. See Supplementary Information for details. In this study we decided to use Gem-HC-239iC. c, Native MS of refolded and conjugated ADC (green) in comparison to refolded unconjugated antibody (orange), indicates intact, homogenous conjugates. d, Toxicity to HEL after 96 h, measured by counting of number of live cells relative to control using the method of trypan blue exclusion. Line represents mean cell viability (one experiment, n = 6 or n = 3). Data suggest Gem-HC-239iC-BL shows increased toxicity compared with non-internalizing control ADC NIP228-HC-239iC-BL, also containing payload 30 in DAR 2, and to native Gem-IgG1, which showed no toxicity at 2.5 µM. e, Representation of the timeline of the HEL tumour cell inoculation and ADC therapy. f, Tumour growth curve. Data are represented as mean ± s.e.m. (n = 5). A two-way ANOVA indicates a significant effect of time versus treatment (P = 0.0089). g, Tumour volume at day 12 (n = 5). Data are represented as mean ± s.e.m. and a Mann–Whitney test was used to test statistical significance. P value has been deleted. h, Overall survival over time (n = 5). Log rank test indicates a statistically significant difference between DAR-2 ADC Gem-HC-239iC-BL treatment versus PBS and versus native antibody Gem-IgG1 treatment (P = 0.0194). i, Gem-HC-239iC-BL-treated (200 mg ml−1) xenograft tissue homogenate sample.

The ADCs were characterized under reducing conditions using liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS) analysis (Supplementary Figs. 7073), with the linker mass identified as an addition to the chain with the engineered cysteine in each case. Native-MS analysis confirmed that the ADCs had retained the bonding pattern of their light and heavy chains (Fig. 6c and Supplementary Figs. 7484). All three conjugates retained a good CD33 binding profile with similar binding to their non-conjugated parent antibodies (Supplementary Fig. 64) and offered good conjugation integrity following incubation tests at physiological pH and temperature (phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), 37 °C) and in the presence of 10% human serum, over 48 h (Supplementary Figs. 8590). The conjugates demonstrated stability to storage, retaining payload when stored at 4 °C for 1 month (Supplementary Figs. 9196). Compound 1 has an IC50 against CD33 + HL-60 cells of 1 µM, and the conjugates displayed toxicity to HL-60 at 0.4 µM, a concentration at which unconjugated antibodies were non-toxic (Supplementary Figs. 9799). Gem-HC-239iC-BL was selected as our favoured conjugate because of favourable reactivity with payload 30 and stability.

DAR 2 ADC inhibits AML tumour growth in mice

We evaluated the antileukaemic effect of DAR 2 ADC Gem-HC-239iC-BL in a subcutaneous mouse model of human AML. NOD-SCID immunocompromised mice were inoculated with HEL cells to induce tumour growth and were treated intravenously with either ADC Gem-HC-239iC-BL, the native antibody Gem-IgG1 or PBS. In vitro, against HEL, Gem-HC-239iC-BL had similar toxicity to 1 while non-targeted NIP228-HC-239iC-BL and Gem-IgG1 showed no apparent toxicity (Fig. 6d). In vitro toxicity results were promising although variable. Results varied depending on the cell-counting method used and potentially because of conjugate aggregation arising from the hydrophobic69 linker and drug. In the in vivo model, a strong antitumour activity was observed with the administration of only two doses of ADC at 7.5 mg kg−1. The ADC-treated mice had decreased tumour volumes relative to the controls (Fig. 6e–g). Moreover, the antileukaemic activity of the ADC significantly improved the survival of the ADC-treated animals (mean of 52 days versus 24 days for control; Fig. 6h). Importantly, two out of the five ADC-treated animals were alive 76 d post-treatment, and no signs of toxicity or metastasis were seen in the liver, spleen, kidney, brain, bone marrow, heart and lung of control mice and mice treated with the ADC as demonstrated by histopathological analysis (Supplementary Figs. 100 and 101 and Supplementary Table 1). To verify drug release, we tested samples of fixed tumour tissue of mice treated with ADC Gem-HC-239iC-BL by LC tandem MS, and in ADC-treated mice we were able to detect and quantify 1, which was present at 0.327 ng g−1 (Fig. 6i, Supplementary Figs. 102105 and Supplementary Tables 2 and 3). These data provide evidence for the successful in vivo release of 1 through the acid-dependent C–C bond-cleaving self-immolative 1,6-elimination mechanism reported in this work. Together, these results demonstrate that the ADC antitumour activity in vivo has great potential to be further developed as an antileukaemic treatment.

Alternative payload classes are an important strategy to identify new treatments and combat drug resistance in the fight against cancer. Here we leverage prodrug chemistry and antibody-mediated delivery to develop a method for intracellular targeting and release of ortho-quinones from a protected redox-inactive form. This work begins to solve a fundamental problem of application of ortho-quinone therapeutics: the reactivity of ortho-quinones with cellular metabolism. Through protection and targeting we aim to increase the concentration of redox-active quinone in the target tissue and decrease the concentration in healthy tissues, thereby lowering associated dose-limiting toxicities.

Unlike previous approaches, our ortho-quinone protection strategy is truly modular and could be adapted to any peptide pro-moiety. The self-immolative 1,6-elimination mechanism described is unprecedented because it cleaves a C–C bond between the benzyl linker and quinone carbon. The elimination is triggered within an acidic pH range, depending on the protected quinone. We demonstrate the generality of the methodology, which we applied to protect model 9,10-phenanthrenquinone and four additional ortho-quinones. β-Lapachone, (±)-dunnione and cryptotanshinone are all ortho-quinones of medicinal interest. 3-Hydroxy-β-lapachone adds additional possibilities for functionalization compatible with the protection strategy.

As an example of the application of the ortho-quinone protection strategy, we synthesized cathepsin-B-cleavable prodrugs of β-lapachone, followed by ADCs using the protection chemistry. For β-lapachone, 1, minimal release of the payload from the quinone-protection unit occurs at physiological pH even after peptide deprotection, which for an ADC means the chemistry offers a built-in protection against premature in-circulation drug release upon linker deconjugation. The rapid cell death triggered by the ADC relative to the untargeted prodrug suggests that released protected quinone species 10 reaches a low pH compartment (4) necessary for its fast elimination. In many cells the FcRn receptor will recycle the antibody to the cell surface directly from the endosome (pH 5.5–6) and prevent access to more acidic compartments70, but our results suggest that our ADC does not undergo notable endosomal recycling71,72. The activity of β-lapachone is believed to be independent of endosomal/lysosomal escape, (that is, it should give a toxic effect as soon as it is released from 10).

This work also highlights the relevance of β-lapachone for the treatment of AML and verifies the relevance of 5-LO as a respective target. ADC therapy is well established in the AML disease area, with reapproval of CD33-targeting Mylotarg (gemtuzumab ozogamycin) for relapsed or refractory AML73 and with many more ADCs in development74. Our protected β-lapachone payload is efficacious in a xenograft AML model following ADC targeting and can effectively expand future treatment options upon further development and optimization. It should also be noted that β-lapachone is a lower-potency payload than those commonly used in ADCs; for example, most marketed ADCs have subnanomolar-potency payloads5. However, the concept that ADCs must contain a subnanomolar toxic payload has been recently challenged and efficacious cancer-cell killing has been obtained with lower-potency payloads75. Side effects, and hence the high attrition rate of ADCs in clinical studies, often result from payload-mediated toxicity; thus a lower-toxicity drug that is masked while in circulation with built-in deconjugation toxicity protection may be advantageous76. In this respect, β-lapachone or other ortho-quinone derivatives offer opportunities for the development of ADCs with a distinct mode of action.

The protection strategy described here is expected to be applicable to other ortho-quinones and may encourage the development of improved synthetic routes to, or new derivatives of, these high-value natural products. Derivatives of β-lapachone with higher toxicity that retain the quinone pharmacophore have been reported77. New prodrugs, drug-targeting strategies and combinations of the two will enable the application of compounds previously deemed inappropriate for medicinal use. Here, we have developed enabling chemistry that facilitates the integration of bioactive ortho-quinones into these strategies.

Methods

Synthetic procedures

All synthetic procedures are described in full in the Supplementary Information.

Solvents, reagents and materials

All non-aqueous reactions were performed in oven-dried glassware under a positive pressure of nitrogen, unless otherwise stated. All reagents, unless otherwise stated, were purchased from commercial suppliers and used as received without further purification. Anhydrous solvents were used for non-aqueous reactions unless otherwise stated. Anhydrous dichloromethane and Et2O were freshly distilled over CaH2 under an atmosphere of argon. Anhydrous dimethylformamide (DMF) was obtained from commercial sources and used directly. Water used experimentally was deionized and prepared on site. Merck Silica gel 60 was used for flash column chromatography. Analysis of reactions was performed using thin-layer chromatography (TLC) silica gel 60 F254 plates. Analytical TLC plates were visualized by ultraviolet at 254 nm or by staining with known indicator solutions.

Characterization of synthesized compounds

NMR spectra were recorded on Bruker 400-AVIII, DPX-400, 500-AVIII HD Smart Probe or Avance-600 BBI spectrometers as appropriate. NMR spectra were recorded at 25 °C and 400, 500 or 600 MHz for 1H and 100, 126 or 150 MHz for 13C. The solvent is specified for each spectrum. The residual solvent peaks were used as an internal reference for chemical shift (1H NMR CDCl3 δ 7.26 ppm, dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) δ 2.50 ppm, MeOD δ 3.31 ppm; 13C NMR CDCl3 δ 77.0 ppm, MeOD δ 49.0 ppm, DMSO δ 39.5 ppm). Splitting patterns are presented as follows: chemical shift (ppm), multiplicity (s, singlet; d, doublet; t, triplet; q, quartet; qu, quintet; sextet; hept, heptet; m, multiplet (denotes complex pattern); br, broad; dd, doublet of doublets; dt, doublet of triplets; td, triplet of doublets), coupling constant (J) and relative integration value. Chemical shifts are given in ppm (δ scale) relative to the resonance of their respective residual solvent peaks, with coupling constants (J) in Hz. Structural assignments are made with the aid of correlated spectroscopy and heteronuclear single quantum coherence. H1/H2 denotes a signal which may correspond to H1 or to H2. For signal processing, MestReNova software v.8.0.0 or 14.2.0 was used. Absorbance and fluorescence spectra of small molecules were recorded on a MiniMax i3x imager in 96well clear plates or clear bottom black plates. High-resolution mass spectra of small molecules were obtained with a Thermo Fisher Orbitrap or Waters Xevo LC-MS and ionized by electrospray.

General procedure to synthesize benzyl ketols 4, 9, 15 and 16

A mixture of orthoquinone (1 equiv.), sodium dithionite (5 equiv.) and tetrabutylammonium bromide (5 equiv.) in THF/water 1:1 was heated to 80 °C for over 10 min. Potassium hydroxide (20 equiv.) in water was then added, followed immediately by Boc-para-aminobenzyl bromide 5 (5.5 equiv.) in THF. The reaction was refluxed for 4.5 h. Water was added, then the product was extracted into ethyl acetate, washed with water, dried (magnesium sulfate) and solvent was removed in vacuo. The crude product was purified by flash column chromatography.

General procedure to synthesize benzyl ketol 14

Boc-para-aminobenzyl bromide 5 (2.9 equiv.), NaI (8.5 equiv), O-protected hydroxy-β-lapachone (1 equiv.) and indium(0) powder (2.3 equiv.) were added to anhydrous DMF. The solution was heated to 40 °C and sonicated for 3 h, while monitoring by TLC. Water and 1 M HCl (drops) were added to quench the reaction and the product was extracted with ethyl acetate. The organic layers were combined and washed with brine, dried (sodium sulfate) and solvent was removed in vacuo. The product was purified by flash column chromatography on silica gel. Pure O-protected benzyl ketol (1 equiv.) was dissolved in THF and methanol and stirred at 0 °C. A separate solution of lithium hydroxide monohydrate (2 equiv.) in water was prepared and added dropwise to the solution over 5 min. The mixture was stirred at 0 °C until completion and then acetic acid (2 equiv.) was added to quench the reaction. The solvent was removed in vacuo, and the residue was redissolved in ethyl acetate. The organic layer was washed with water, brine, dried (sodium sulfate) and the solvent removed in vacuo, affording benzyl ketol 14.

1H NMR kinetic analysis of elimination of PAB-PhQ

Kinetics of the release of PhQ 4 from PAB-PhQ 7 were monitored by 1H NMR at 25 °C. Analysis was performed in MeOD due to poor solubility of the compound in H2O. To form the active eliminating species, Boc-PAB-PhQ 6 was dissolved in dichloromethane/trifluoroacetic acid 4:1 at 0 °C and stirred for 30 min, upon which the reaction appeared complete by TLC. Product 7 was dried in vacuo before being dissolved in MeOD. The basicity of the solution was altered by addition of triethylamine (drops). pH was estimated using pH paper. pH values are only indicative because analysis is performed in MeOD. Elimination rates were determined from the aromatic region. Kinetics were measured by monitoring the integral of one peak, normalized to the number of protons present (that is, the integral of 1H), divided by the total integral of the aromatic region (δ = 6.2–8.6 ppm, that is, the integral of 12 H). Analysis was performed using Mestrenova v.14.2.0 processing software and rate constants were calculated using GraphPad Prism v.8.0 software.

Penicillin-G-amidase-mediated kinetic analysis of elimination at physiological pH

Stocks of 2-phenylacetyl-para-aminobenzyl ketol were made up in DMF at a concentration of 10 mM. For a reaction, 17.5 µl of ketol stock was added to 17.5 µl of a 10 mM stock of internal standard in DMF and 310 µl of PBS at pH 7.4. To initiate a reaction, 5 µl of a suspension of penicillin G amidase (PenG, Sigma-Aldrich enzyme 76427, 5–10 U mg−1) was added. In control samples 5 µl of PBS was added in place of the enzyme. Test and control samples were then incubated at 37 °C with shaking. At the recorded time points, 20 µl aliquots of the reactions were analysed by HPLC (254 nm, ThermoFisher U3000). HPLC column: Phenomenex Kinetex C18, 5 µm, 50 × 4.6 mm, 100 Å; flow, 1 ml min−1. Gradient and solvent system for assay with 2-phenylacetyl-PAB-PhQ 21: A = H2O, B = acetonitrile, t = 0–1 min 0% B, t = 1–10 min 0–100% B, t = 10–11 min 0% B. Gradient and solvent system for assay with 2-phenylacetyl-PAB-BL 22 and 2-phenylacetyl-PAB-DN 23: A = H2O + 0.1% formic acid, B = acetonitrile + 0.1% formic acid, t = 0–1 min 0% B, t = 1–10 min 0–40% B, t = 10–16 min 40–50% B, t = 16.1 min 100% B, t = 16.1–18 min 100% B, t = 18–20 min 0% B. Peaks were identified by LC–MS analysis and comparison with pure compounds. Values described represent peak area (mAU × min) divided by peak area of internal standard. Recorded values are averages of three independent reactions and error bars display standard errors of the mean. Fitting was performed using GraphPad Prism 8 software. Rate and half-life measurements were calculated by consumption of intermediate para-aminobenzyl ketol and formation of product quinone.

pH-rate aqueous kinetic analysis of fragmentation

pH-rate analysis was performed by adaption of the PenG assay. To obtain deprotected para-aminobenzyl ketol species, 2-phenylacetyl protected ketol was dissolved in PBS with 33% DMF to a concentration of 3.3 mM. Then 20 µl of a stock solution of PenG was added to 600 µl of this stock and incubated for 20 min at 37 °C, after which 20 µl of a 100 mM stock of internal standard in DMSO was added. Reactions were then set up immediately. For a reaction, 10 µl of the aminobenzyl ketol/standard stock was added to 190 µl of citrate–phosphate buffer at the specified pH to obtain an aqueous solution containing 1.8% DMSO. Test samples were incubated at 37 °C with shaking. At the recorded time points, 20 µl aliquots of the reactions were analysed by HPLC (254 nm, ThermoFisher U3000). HPLC conditions: column Phenomenex Kinetex C18 5 µm, 50 × 4.6 mm, 100 Å; solvent system A = H2O + 0.1% formic acid, B = acetonitrile + 0.1% formic acid; flow, 1 ml min−1. Gradient for assay with PAB-PhQ 7: t = 0–1 min 0% B, t = 1–10 min 0–100% B, t = 10–11 min 0% B. Gradient for assay with PAB-BL 10 and PAB-DN 18: t = 0–1 min 0% B, t = 1–10 min 0–40% B, t = 10–16 min 40–50% B, t = 16.1 min 100% B, t = 16.1–18 min 100% B, t = 18–20 min 0% B. Values described represent peak area (mAU × min) divided by peak area of internal standard. Where necessary, peaks were deconvoluted using Origin fitting software. Recorded values are averages of three independent reactions and error bars display standard errors of the mean. Values were fitted using GraphPad Prism software. Rate and half-life measurements were calculated based on consumption of the para-aminobenzyl ketol species.

In vitro redox-cycling ability analysis

The in vitro redox-cycling capability of compounds was assessed by phenol red/horseradish peroxidase (HRP) assay by adaption of a previously described protocol78. Briefly, stocks were prepared as follows: (1) DTT to a concentration of 2.4 µM in PBS pH 7.4 buffer; (2) compound stocks in PBS pH 7.4 buffer to 3× the desired concentration by 1,000× dilution of DMSO stocks; (3) a stock of phenol red/HRP detection reagent containing 300 µg ml−1 phenol red and 180 µg ml−1 HRP enzyme in PBS pH 7.4 buffer; (4) a stock of 1 M NaOH in water; (5) a stock of 100 µM H2O2 in PBS prepared by addition of a 30% solution of H2O2 in water into 1,000 µl of PBS. Into each well of a 96-well clear flat-bottomed plate was then added 40 µl of compound stock in PBS followed by 40 µl of DTT stock, followed immediately by 40 µl of phenol red/HRP reagent. A positive control with 100 µM H2O2 added in place of compound was included. The plate was incubated in the dark at room temperature for 15 min. Following this, 20 µl of 1 M NaOH was added to each well to terminate the reaction. Absorbance was immediately measured at 610 nm (MiniMax i3x Imager, Molecular Devices). Absorbance of treated wells was normalized to control wells treated with PBS only (zero redox cycling).

Cellular ROS detection

To determine ROS generation by compounds in leukaemia cells, HL-60 cells were washed with PBS, then incubated in serum-free media (10 ml of 1.6 × 106 ml−1 cell concentration) with 2,7-dichlorofluorescin diacetate at 20 µM for 30 min at 37 °C. Following this, the cells were washed with PBS and resuspended in Fluorbrite–DMEM media (ThermoFisher) (10 ml). Then, 450 µl of the cell mixture was seeded into wells of a clear flat-bottomed 12-well plate, to which 50 µl of a 10× stock of the compounds in media had been already added, to achieve a final compound concentration of 50 µM. The 10× media stocks were made by 100-fold dilution of DMSO compound stocks, to ensure a final in-plate DMSO concentration of 0.1%. DMSO 0.1% only was used as a negative control. H2O2 was used as a positive control, for which 10 µl of a 30% aqueous solution was dissolved into 1 ml DMSO, then diluted 100-fold into media for plating, to give a final H2O2 concentration of 1 µM. After plating the cells were immediately incubated at 37 °C in the dark for 15 min before the fluorescence of the wells (excitation, 485 nm; emission, 535 nm) was recorded (MiniMax i3x Imager, Molecular Devices).

Methaemoglobin analysis

Defibrinated Oxoid sheep’s blood (ThermoScientific) was diluted to a 5% v/v suspension in PBS pH 7.4. In a 96-well microtitre plate, 150 µl of blood suspension was added to 50 µl of serially diluted compound in PBS containing a 4× stock of each compound of interest. Serial dilution of compounds from DMSO stocks into PBS was performed to achieve an in-plate DMSO concentration of 0.1%. PBS buffer alone was used as a negative control. The plate was incubated for the specified time at 37 °C. The plate was then centrifuged at 3,500 r.p.m. for 5 min. The supernatant was removed and cells lysed by resuspension in 100 µl of a solution of Triton-X-100 (1%) in PBS. Following this, 80 µl of lysed cell contents were transferred to a second microtitre plate for ultraviolet measurement. Ultraviolet absorbance was measured immediately at 630 nm (MiniMax i3x Imager, Molecular Devices). Methaemoglobin increase was determined by \(\left( {{{A}}_{630} - {{A}}_{630}^0} \right)/\left( {{{A}}_{630}^0} \right) \times 100\), where A630 is the absorbance of the test well at 630 nm, and \({{A}}_{630}^0\) is the absorbance of the negative control at 630 nm.

Haemolysis analysis

To analyse haemolysis, defibrinated Oxoid sheep’s blood (ThermoScientific) was diluted to a 5% v/v suspension in PBS pH 7.4. In a 96-well microtitre plate, 190 µl of blood suspension was added to 10 µl of serially diluted compound in PBS containing a 20× stock of each compound of interest. Serial dilution of compounds from DMSO stocks into PBS were performed to achieve an in-plate DMSO concentration of 0.2%. PBS buffer with 0.2% DMSO was used as a negative control. Triton-X (1% v/v) was used as a positive haemolysis control. The plate was incubated for 6 h at 37 °C. Following incubation, the plate was centrifuged at 3,500 r.p.m. for 5 min at room temperature. Cell pellets were lysed by resuspension in 100 µl of a solution of Triton X-100 (1%) in PBS. Then, 80 µl of lysed cell contents were transferred to a second microtitre plate for ultraviolet measurement. Ultraviolet absorbance was measured immediately at 540 nm. The percentage of haemolysis was determined by \(\left( {{{{\mathrm{A}}}}_{540}-{{{\mathrm{A}}}}_{540}^0} \right)/\left( {{{{\mathrm{A}}}}_{540}^{{{{\mathrm{total}}}}}-{{{\mathrm{A}}}}_{540}^0} \right) \times 100\), where A540 is the absorbance of the test well at 540 nm, \({{{\mathrm{A}}}}_{540}^0\) is the absorbance of the negative control at 540 nm and \({{{\mathrm{A}}}}_{540}^{{{{\mathrm{total}}}}}\) is the absorbance of the positive haemolysis control (100% haemolysis at 540 nm).

Expression, purification and cell-free activity assay for recombinant human 5-LO

Escherichia coli (BL21) was transformed with pT3-5-LO plasmid, and recombinant 5-LO protein was expressed at 30 °C as described79. Cells were lysed in 50 mM triethanolamine/HCl pH 8.0, 5 mM EDTA, 1 mM phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride, soybean trypsin inhibitor (60 μg ml−1) and lysozyme (1 mg ml−1), homogenized by sonication (3 × 15 s) and centrifuged at 40,000g for 20 min at 4 °C. The 40,000g supernatant (S40) was applied to an ATP–agarose column to partially purify 5-LO as described. Aliquots of semipurified 5-LO (0.5 μg) were diluted with 1 ml ice-cold PBS containing 1 mM EDTA. Samples were preincubated with the test compound or vehicle (0.1% DMSO) with or without 1 mM DTT, as indicated. After 10 min at 4 °C, samples were prewarmed for 30 s at 37 °C, and 2 mM CaCl2 plus 20 μM arachidonic acid was added to start the formation of 5-LO products. After 10 min, the reaction was stopped by addition of 1 volume of ice-cold methanol, and the formed 5-LO products were analysed by reverse-phase HPLC as described80. 5-LO products include the all-trans isomers of LTB4 (trLTB4 isomers) and 5(S)-hydroperoxy-6-trans-8,11,14-cis-eicosatetraenoic acid and its corresponding alcohol 5(S)-hydroxy-6-trans-8,11,14-cis-eicosatetraenoic acid.

In vitro cleavage of peptide–lapachone prodrugs by cathepsin B

Cathepsin B cleavage of Cbz-dipeptide-protected prodrugs was tested in vitro as follows: cathepsin B (Abcam ab151914) was preactivated by dilution of enzyme stock (20 µl, 0.44 mg ml−1, 37 kDa, 12 µM) into activation buffer (45 µl, MES 25 mM pH 5 + 10 mM DTT). The reaction was incubated at 37 °C for 20 min. Reactions were made up containing the prodrug of interest (15 µl of a 5 mM stock in DMSO) and internal standard acetophenone (0.75 µl of a 100 mM stock in DMF) in MES 20 mM pH 5 buffer (114.25 µl) resulting in a total reaction volume of 150 µl at pH 5 with 10.5% DMSO, 500 µM prodrug and 0.5 µM of cathepsin B (1,000 equiv. of substrate compared to enzyme). A 20 µl sample of each reaction was removed immediately at t = 0. Following preactivation, activated cathepsin stock (20 µl) was added to test reactions. Cathepsin activation buffer only (MES 25 mM pH 5 + 10 mM DTT, 20 µl) was added to negative control samples. Samples were then incubated with shaking (500 r.p.m.) at 37 °C. Subsequent 20 µl samples were removed at specified time points and analysed by HPLC (254 and 430 nm; instrument: ThermoFisher U3000; column: Phenomenex Kinetex C18, 5 µm, 50 × 4.6 mm, 100 Å; solvent system A = H2O, B = acetonitrile; flow, 1 ml min−1; gradient: t = 0–1.0 min 0% B, t = 1.0–5.0 min 0–40% B, t = 5.0–12.0 min 40% B, t = 12.1–14.0 min 100% B, t = 14.1–15.0 min 0% B). Spectra at 254 nm were normalized to the height of the internal standard; spectra at 430 nm were unnormalized.

Antibody expression and purification

The variable heavy-chain and light-chain sequences for gemtuzumab were identified as previously described81,82,83. Strings of the variable domains were produced from Geneart, Invitrogen and cloned into mammalian expression vectors encoding either standard human IgG1 constant regions or site-specific cysteine variants such as Gem-LC-V205C, Gem-HC-239iC and Gem-HC-S442C using NEBuilder assembly from NewEnglandBiolabs. Antibodies were transiently expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells under serum-free conditions as previously described84. Cleared culture supernatant was loaded directly onto MapSelect SuRe column equilibrated with PBS (pH 7.2). Antibodies were step eluted with 0.1 M glycine pH 2.7. Pooled fractions were buffer exchanged into PBS.

Antibody–linker conjugation reactions

Antibodies in PBS pH 7.2 + 1 mM EDTA buffer were refolded prior to reaction. The refolding procedure was performed as follows. First, antibodies were reduced with tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine hydrochloride (20 equiv., to a final concentration of 10% DMF) for 30 min at 37 °C. Antibodies were desalted with Zeba spin desalting columns (0.5 ml, 7 kDa molecular weight cut-off, size exclusion columns, ThermoFisher) into PBS pH 7.2 + 1 mM EDTA. (l)-Dehydroascorbic acid (20 equiv., to a final concentration of 10% DMF) was then added and the antibodies were incubated for 3.5 h at 25 °C. Antibodies were desalted with Zeba spin desalting columns into NaPi 20 mM pH 8. Refolding and reactivity was assessed by reaction of a sample of each antibody (10 µl containing 10 µM antibody) in NaPi 20 mM pH 8 with N-ethyl benzoylacrylic acid (5 equiv. per cysteine + 1 µl of a stock in DMF) for 30 min at 37 °C, according to a published protocol66. Antibody–drug linker conjugations were performed by incubation (with shaking) of refolded antibody stock with the specified equivalent of linker for the specified time period in a buffer of NaPi 20 mM pH 8 and a final concentration of DMF of 10%. After completion of the reaction, antibodies were desalted with Zeba spin desalting columns (ThermoScientific) into PBS pH 7.4. Following reaction, a sample of conjugate was subject to reduced LC–MS analysis to assess conversion. The concentration of the conjugates was determined by ultraviolet absorbance at 280 nm (A280), as measured using a SpectraDrop reader (MiniMax i3x Imager, Molecular Devices). Ultraviolet absorbances were corrected by the expression A280 − (1.929 × A330) to account for light scattering.

Antibody–conjugate integrity analysis

The stability of the antibody conjugates to deconjugation of payload at physiological temperature was measured by incubation of conjugate (10 µl of 20 µM stock) in PBS pH 7.4 buffer at 37 °C with shaking. After 48 h, 10 µl aliquots were taken and analysed for percentage conjugated to unconjugated antibody by reduced LC–MS analysis. Conjugate stability to storage at 4 °C in PBS pH 7.4 buffer over an extended period (3–4 weeks) was assessed. Stability of conjugate to deconjugation of payload in human serum was assessed by incubation of conjugate (10 µl of 20 µM stock) with 1 µl of human serum in PBS pH 7.4 buffer at 37 °C. After 48 h, 10 µl aliquots were taken and analysed for percentage conjugated to unconjugated antibody by reduced LC–MS analysis.

General cell culture conditions

Cells were incubated in a humidified 10% CO2/90% air atmosphere at 37 °C. HL-60 cells were cultured in RPMI medium (Gibco) with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum. HEL cells were grown in RPMI media with 20% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum. Leukaemia cells were maintained at a density of 1 × 106 cells ml−1. Cells were split every second day to keep them in the exponential growth phase. SKBR-3 and HCT-116 cells were grown in McCoy’s 5A Modified Medium (Gibco) with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum. MCF-7 cells were grown in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (Gibco) with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum. Adherent cell lines were passaged by addition of trypsin–EDTA (0.25%) (Gibco). HL-60 was kindly donated from the group of Prof. Bruno Silva-Santos, iMM Lisbon. HEL was kindly donated from the group of Prof. Bruno Silva-Santos from iMM, Lisbon (in vivo studies) or Dr Isaia Barbieri, Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge (in vitro ADC studies). HeLa, SKBr3 and HCT-116 were purchased from ATCC. MCF-7 was kindly donated from the group of Dr Sérgio Almeida, iMM Lisbon.

Viability assays with small-molecule lapachone models

Assays assessing cytotoxicity of β-lapachone and derivatives were performed by CellTiter-Blue assay (Promega) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, adherent cancer-cell lines were plated at 20,000 cells per well in 96-well plates or suspension cell lines were plated at a concentration of 2 × 105 cells ml−1 in 24-well plates. Compound stocks in media were made by dilution of DMSO stocks containing the compound of interest to obtain a final in-plate DMSO concentration of only 0.1%. Incubation was performed for 48 h. Following incubation, media was replaced with media containing CellTiter-Blue (Promega) in 1:10 dilution and the plates were incubated for 1.5–4 h. The fluorescence of the plates was recorded (excitation, 555 nm; emission, 585 nm; MiniMax i3x Reader, Molecular Devices). Cell viability was calculated by division of the fluorescence intensity of treated wells by that of the calculated average fluorescence intensity of replicate negative control wells containing cells with 0.1% DMSO only. IC50 values were calculated using GraphPad Prism 8 software.

N-Acetyl cysteine assay

For assays involving cytotoxicity of β-lapachone derivatives with and without antioxidant N-acetyl cysteine, HL-60 cells were plated into 24-well plates at a concentration of 2.5 × 105 cells ml−1 in 450 µl. To each well was then added 25 µl of drug diluted in PBS to obtain the correct in-plate drug concentration, and 25 µl of PBS or a stock of N-acetyl cysteine at 12 mM in PBS. DMSO was maintained at an in-plate concentration of 0.1%. After 96 h incubation, toxicity was assessed by counting of live cells using the trypan blue exclusion method with a Countess II Automated Cell Counter (ThermoFisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Cell viability was determined by dividing the average live cell number of treated wells by the average live cell number for control wells treated with 0.1% DMSO. Viability for wells treated with N-acetyl cysteine was assessed by comparison with control wells treated with N-acetyl cysteine and 0.1% DMSO. IC50 values were calculated using GraphPad Prism 8 software.

Viability assays with small-molecule prodrugs and ADCs using the trypan blue exclusion method

For assays assessing cytotoxicity of β-lapachone versus small-molecule prodrugs, antibodies and ADCs, suspension cells were plated into 24-well plates at a density of 2.5 × 105 cells ml−1 in 240 µl. Stocks of ADC or antibody in PBS were normalized to 12.5 µM. Serial dilutions of compound were made up in PBS. Then, 60 µl of each stock of either PBS or compound in PBS was added to the cells to achieve the desired final concentration. After the specified incubation time, toxicity was assessed by counting of live cells using the trypan blue exclusion method with a Countess II Automated Cell Counter (ThermoFisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Cell viability was determined by dividing the average live cell number of treated wells by the average live cell number for control wells treated with PBS only. IC50 values were calculated using GraphPad Prism software. Note: for the assay performed over 96 h, 5% human serum was added to media instead of 10% fetal bovine serum, to limit non-specific antibody internalisation. This had little effect on ADC toxicity.

Lysosomal inhibition assay with small molecule prodrugs

Assays to assess the effect of lysosomal activity on prodrugs were performed as follows: HL-60 cells were plated into 96-well plates at a concentration of 2.5 × 105 cells ml−1 in 180 µl media. Cells were treated with 10 µl of a stock of NH4Cl in PBS (to obtain an in-plate concentration of 3 or 30 mM), 10 µl of a dilution of a DMSO stock of E64d in PBS (to obtain an in-plate concentration of 30 μM), PBS only or a dilution of DMSO in PBS. Cells were incubated for 30 min. Following this, 10 µl of a stock of test compound made by dilution of a DMSO stock into media was added. DMSO was present in-plate at a maximum of 0.2%. Cells were incubated overnight for 16 h. Following incubation, media was replaced with media containing CellTiter-Blue (Promega) in 1:4 dilution and the plates were incubated for 6 h. The fluorescence of the plates was recorded (excitation, 555 nm; emission, 585 nm; MiniMax i3x Reader, Molecular Devices). Cell viability was calculated by division of the fluorescence intensity of treated wells by that of the average fluorescence intensity of the relevant negative control wells.

Protein mass spectrometry

LC–MS to analyse protein samples was performed on a SQ Detector 2 connected to an Acquity UPLC system using an Acquity UPLC BEH300 C4 column (1.7 μm, 2.1 mm × 50 mm). Flow rate was set at 0.2 ml min−1 with eluents of solvent A (water with 0.1% formic acid) and solvent B (71% acetonitrile, 29% water with 0.075% formic acid). The gradient was from solvent A/B (72:28) to 100% B over 25 min, followed by solvent B for 2 min and then up to solvent A/B (72:28) over 18 min. A capillary voltage of 2.0 kV and a cone voltage of 40 V were used for the electrospray source. The desolvation gas was nitrogen at a total flow of 850 l h−1. Mass spectra were reconstructed using the MaxEnt algorithm preinstalled on MassLynx software (Waters) from the ion series. To obtain the ion series described, the major peak(s) of the chromatogram were selected for integration and further analysis.

Native protein MS

Native MS evaluations were performed on a Synapt High Definition Mass Spectrometer (Waters). All protein samples were buffer exchanged into 200 mM aqueous ammonium acetate buffer solution in water using Zeba spin desalting columns (0.5 ml, 7 kDa molecular weight cut-off, size-exclusion columns, ThermoFisher). The samples were further diluted to 2–10 µM before native MS evaluation. Sample aliquots of 2.5 µl were transferred to a borosilicate emitter (Thermo Scientific) before being introduced into the mass spectrometer. The instrument was set up for the detection of high mass complexes. The conditions used for these experiments were: capillary voltages, 1.6–2.5 kV; sample cone voltages, 100–180 V; source temperature, 80 °C, extraction cone voltage, 3–8 V; nanoflow gas pressure, 0.02–0.5 bar; backing pressure, 3.5–3.9 mbar; trap pressure, 3.2 × 102 mbar, ion mobility spectrometry (N2) pressure, 6.1 × 10–1 mbar; and time-of-flight pressure, 7.1 × 10–7 mbar. Spectra were calibrated externally using caesium iodide. Data acquisition and processing were performed using MassLynx 4.1 (Waters).

In vivo AML xenograft study

The AML cell line used in this study, HEL cells, were a kind donation of Prof. Bruno Silva-Santos, iMM, Lisbon. The cells were maintained in a humidified incubator at 37 °C under 5% CO2 and grown using 1× RPMI 1640 medium without l-glutamine (Invitrogen, Life Technologies) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Gibco, Thermo Scientific), 1× MEM NEAA (Gibco, Thermo Scientific), 1× sodium pyruvate (Gibco, Thermo Scientific), 1× GlutaMAX (Gibco, Thermo Scientific), 200 U ml−1 penicillin and 200 µg ml−1 streptomycin (Gibco, Thermo Scientific) and 10 mM HEPES (Gibco, Thermo Scientific). All animal experiments were conducted at the Instituto de Medicina Molecular João Lobo Antunes (Lisbon). Animal work was performed in strict accordance with Portuguese law (Portaria 1005/92) and European Guideline 86/609/EEC and follows the Federation of European Laboratory Animal Science Associations guidelines and recommendations concerning laboratory animal welfare. Furthermore, all animal experiments were approved by the Portuguese DGAV and the IMM Animal Ethics Committee (authorization AWB_2017_11_GB_AMLeukemia). A localized model of AML was established in 8-week-old female NOD-SCID mice (purchased from Charles River) by inoculating 5 × 106 HEL cells subcutaneously in the flank. Tumour growth was monitored over time, by performing bilateral vernier caliper measurements every 3–4 d and mean tumour volumes were calculated using the formula (length × width2)/2. Treatments were initiated when tumours reached approximately 100 mm3 (approximately 10 d after tumour induction), with the mice having been randomly assigned to receive DAR-2 ADC or native antibody and PBS as controls. Treatments were administered intravenously in two injections with a 3 d interval. Animals were observed every 3–4 d; tumours were measured as described before and mouse weight was evaluated throughout the study. Once tumours reached 1,000 mm3 animals were killed, and maximal tumour burden was not exceeded. No signs of animal suffering or discomfort were observed, including no weight loss. The light/dark cycle was 14 h light/10 h dark (lights on at 07:00; lights off at 21:00). The temperature was 20–24 °C and the relative humidity was 55 ± 10%. The type of food was autoclaved diet pellets RM3A (P), from SDS Special Diets Services (product code 801030). Food was placed in a grid inside the cage and provided ad libitum to animals. The type of water was sterile water treated by reverse osmosis. Water was provided ad libitum to animals through bottles with a capillary hole. The data collected were analysed using GraphPad Prism8. Once the mice had been killed (by isoflurane overdose) comprehensive necropsy was performed. Macroscopic findings were recorded, and heart, lung, left and right kidney, liver, spleen, central nervous system and primary tumours were collected for histopathology. Samples were immersion fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin, routinely processed for paraffin embedding, sectioned at 4 µm, and stained with haematoxylin and eosin. Lesions were classified according to previously published criteria (International Harmonization of Nomenclature and Diagnostic Criteria for Lesions in Rats and Mice) and scored according to a six-tier severity scale: 0, absent; 1, minimal; 2, mild; 3, moderate; 4, marked; 5, severe. Distant metastasis were scored according to a five-tier severity scale: 0, absent; 1, minimal; 2, mild; 3, moderate; 4, marked. Representative haematoxylin and eosin pictures were obtained using NDP.view2 software (Hamamatsu) in slides digitally scanned in the Hamamatsu NanoZoomerSQ (20× for heart, lung, liver, spleen, kidney and primary tumour; and 10× for the central nervous system).

Quantitative LC–MS/MS of β-lapachone in formol-fixed xenograft mouse tumour and formol supernatant

Concentrations of β-lapachone in formalin-fixed tumour and the respective formol supernatant were quantified using reversed-phase ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry as previously described85. Care was taken during sample handling to minimize exposure to light, and amber glass/plastic and foil wrapping were used where possible. Tumour tissue was homogenized to a concentration of 200 mg ml−1 with PBS. An aliquot of homogenate or formol supernatant sample was transferred to a fresh tube with cryptotanshinone (internal standard) in ethyl acetate for liquid–liquid extraction. Samples were mixed, centrifuged and the ethyl acetate layer transferred to a 96-well plate, evaporated and reconstituted in 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile:water 70:30. PBS was used as the surrogate matrix for calibration standards and quality-control samples. The calibration ranges were 0.25–250 ng g−1 (homogenate) and 0.05–50 ng ml−1 (formol). The analytical batches included quality-control samples at low, medium and high concentrations. The analysis was performed on a Shimadzu Nexera X2 UHPLC coupled to a Sciex TripleTOF 6600 mass spectrometer. The extracted samples were injected onto a Phenomenex Kinetex EVO C18, 1.7 µm, 50 × 2.1 mm analytical column, at 35 °C. Gradient elution was performed using 0.1% formic acid in water and an increasing percentage of 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile at 0.5 ml min−1, with a total run time of 4 min. The mass spectrometer was operated with positive electrospray ionization and enhanced high-sensitivity product ion scans of 100–500 Da, from precursor ions m/z 243.0 (β-lapachone) and m/z 297.0 (cryptotanshinone). Extracted ion chromatograms were produced from product ions m/z 187.0358 (β-lapachone) and m/z 251.1411 (cryptotanshinone), with a range of ±0.025 Da. The peak area ratios from the integrated analyte and internal standard chromatograms were used to back-calculate the concentrations of β-lapachone against a linear 1/x2 weighted calibration curve.

Quantum mechanical calculations

Full geometry optimizations were carried out with Gaussian 16 (ref. 86), using the M06-2X hybrid functional87 and 6-31+G(d,p) basis set in combination with ultrafine integration grids. Bulk solvent effects in water were considered implicitly through the IEF-PCM polarizable continuum model88. The possibility of different conformations was taken into account for all structures. All stationary points were characterized by a frequency analysis performed at the same level used in the geometry optimizations from which thermal corrections were obtained at 313.15 or 298.15 K. Frequency analyses were carried out at the same level used in the geometry optimizations, and the nature of the stationary points was determined in each case according to the appropriate number of negative eigenvalues of the Hessian matrix. The quasiharmonic approximation reported by Truhlar and co-workers was used to replace the harmonic oscillator approximation for the calculation of the vibrational contribution to enthalpy and entropy89. Scaled frequencies were not considered. Mass-weighted intrinsic reaction coordinate calculations were carried out using the Gonzalez and Schlegel scheme90,91 to ensure that the TSs indeed connected the appropriate reactants and products. Single-point energies were alternatively calculated on the optimized geometries using combinations of different density functionals (M06-2X and ωB97x-D92), basis sets (6-31+G(d,p) and 6-311++G(2d,p)) and implicit solvation models (IEF-PCM and SMD93)) (Supplementary Table 4). Gibbs free energies (ΔG) were used for the discussion on the relative stabilities of the considered structures. The lowest-energy conformer for each computed stationary point was considered in the calculation of the elimination activation barriers; all the computed structures can be obtained from authors upon request. Computed molecular structures were depicted using open-source PyMol 2.3 (https://pymol.org). Electronic energies, entropies, enthalpies, Gibbs free energies and lowest frequencies of the calculated structures are summarized in Supplementary Table 5. Cartesian coordinates of the lowest-energy structures calculated with PCM(H2O)/M06-2X/6-31+G(d,p) are shown in Supplementary Table 6. Theoretical kinetic and equilibrium constants derived from fitting of experimental and computed data were calculated using Microcal Origin Pro 2020b.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

Data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and its Supplementary Information. The Supplementary Information reports experiments described within the manuscript in greater detail, and describes synthetic procedures and characterization data. Requests for materials should be addressed to G.L.J.B. and G.J.O. Source data of HPLC traces used to calculate the kinetics of PAB-PhQ, PAB-BL and PAB-DN elimination in aqueous solution are provided with the manuscript. All computed geometries, energies and fitting data can be accessed through the Zenodo repository (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6325898). No restrictions on data availability apply. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Rayan, A., Raiyn, J. & Falah, M. Nature is the best source of anticancer drugs: indexing natural products for their anticancer bioactivity. PLoS ONE 12, 1–12 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rodrigues, T., Reker, D., Schneider, P. & Schneider, G. Counting on natural products for drug design. Nat. Chem. 8, 531–541 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lichota, A. & Gwozdzinski, K. Anticancer activity of natural compounds from plant and marine environment. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19, 3533 (2018).

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Rooseboom, M., Commandeur, J. A. N. N. M. & Vermeulen, N. P. E. Enzyme-catalyzed activation of anticancer prodrugs. Pharmacol. Rev. 56, 53–102 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Beck, A., Goetsch, L., Dumontet, C. & Corvaïa, N. Strategies and challenges for the next generation of antibody–drug conjugates. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 16, 315–337 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cragg, G. M., Grothaus, P. G. & Newman, D. J. New horizons for old drugs and drug leads. J. Nat. Prod. 77, 703–723 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cragg, G. M. & Pezzuto, J. M. Natural products as a vital source for the discovery of cancer chemotherapeutic and chemopreventive agents. Med. Princ. Pract. 25, 41–59 (2016).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pardee, A. B., Li, Y. Z. & Li, C. J. Cancer therapy with beta-lapachone. Curr. Cancer Drug Targets 2, 227–242 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lu, Y., Liu, D., Li, L. & Zhou, J.-R. Tanshinone IIA, a major component of Danshen posses potent anticancer and antiangiogenic activities. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 15, A118 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chonsut, P. et al. Ethoxy mansonone G as an anticancer agent in estrogen receptor-positive and endocrine-resistant breast cancer. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 71, 1839–1853 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bian, J. et al. Synthesis and evaluation of (±)-dunnione and its ortho-quinone analogues as substrates for NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1). Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 25, 1244–1248 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Burmaoğlu, S. et al. Syntheses and evaluation of multicaulin and miltirone-like compounds as antituberculosis agents. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 32, 878–884 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Deng, F. et al. Synthesis and antitumor activity of novel salvicine analogues. Chin. Chem. Lett. 22, 25–28 (2011).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Saruul, E. et al. An antibacterial ortho-quinone diterpenoid and its derivatives from Caryopteris mongolica. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 25, 2555–2558 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gómez Castellanos, J. R., Prieto, J. M. & Heinrich, M. Red lapacho (Tabebuia impetiginosa)—a global ethnopharmacological commodity? J. Ethnopharmacol. 121, 1–13 (2009).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Planchon, S. M. et al. β-Lapachone-mediated apoptosis in human promyelocytic leukemia (HL-60) and human prostate cancer cells: a p53-independent response. Cancer Res. 55, 3706–3711 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Yang, Y. et al. β-Lapachone suppresses tumour progression by inhibiting epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in NQO1-positive breast cancers. Sci Rep. 7, 1–13 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bey, E. A. et al. An NQO1- and PARP-1-mediated cell death pathway induced in non-small-cell lung cancer cells by β-lapachone. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 11832–11837 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Ough, M. et al. Efficacy of β-lapachone in pancreatic cancer treatment: Exploiting the novel, therapeutic target NQO1. Cancer Biol. Ther. 4, 95–102 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pink, J. J. et al. NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase activity is the principal determinant of β-lapachone cytotoxicity. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 5416–5424 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gopinath, P., Mahammed, A., Ohayon, S., Gross, Z. & Brik, A. Understanding and predicting the potency of ROS-based enzyme inhibitors, exemplified by naphthoquinones and ubiquitin specific protease-2. Chem. Sci. 7, 7079–7086 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Bolton, J. L. & Dunlap, T. Formation and biological targets of quinones: cytotoxic versus cytoprotective effects. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 30, 13–37 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Powis, G. Free radical formation by antitumor quinones. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 6, 63–101 (1989).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Shapiro, G. I. et al. Phase I trial of ARQ 501, an activated checkpoint therapy (ACT) agent, in patients with advanced solid tumors. J. Clin. Oncol. 23, 3042–3042 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gerber, D. E. et al. Phase 1 study of ARQ 761, a β-lapachone analogue that promotes NQO1-mediated programmed cancer cell necrosis. Br. J. Cancer 119, 928–936 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Penning, T. M. Genotoxicity of ortho-quinones: reactive oxygen species versus covalent modification. Toxicol. Res. 6, 740–754 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Li, C. J., Li, Y. Z., Pinto, A. V. & Pardee, A. B. Potent inhibition of tumor survival in vivo by β-lapachone plus taxol: combining drugs imposes different artificial checkpoints. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 13369–13374 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Huang, X. et al. Leveraging an NQO1 bioactivatable drug for tumor-selective use of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase nhibitors. Cancer Cell 30, 940–952 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Sborov, D. W., Haverkos, B. M. & Harris, P. J. Investigational cancer drugs targeting cell metabolism in clinical development. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 24, 79–94 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Fulda, S., Galluzzi, L. & Kroemer, G. Targeting mitochondria for cancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 9, 447–464 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Cui, Q. et al. Modulating ROS to overcome multidrug resistance in cancer. Drug Resist. Updat. 41, 1–25 (2018).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Li, X. et al. NQO1 targeting prodrug triggers innate sensing to overcome checkpoint blockade resistance. Nature Commun. 10, 3251 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ma, X. et al. Esterase-activatable β-lapachone prodrug micelles for NQO1-targeted lung cancer therapy. J. Control. Release 200, 201–211 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhou, Y. et al. Lysosome-oriented, dual-stage pH-responsive polymeric micelles for β-lapachone delivery. J. Mater. Chem. B 4, 7429–7440 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Gao, J., Boothman, D., Zhou, Y. & Bey, E. PH-sensitive compositions for delivery of beta lapachone and methods of use. US patent 9,631,041 B2 (2017).

  36. Blencowe, C. A., Russell, A. T., Greco, F., Hayes, W. & Thornthwaite, D. W. Self-immolative linkers in polymeric delivery systems. Polym. Chem. 2, 773–790 (2011).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Caculitan, N. G. et al. Cathepsin B is dispensable for cellular processing of cathepsin B-cleavable antibody–drug conjugates. Cancer Res. 77, 7027–7037 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Zhang, D. et al. Immolation of p-aminobenzyl ether linker and payload potency and stability determine the cell-killing activity of antibody–drug conjugates with phenol-containing payloads. Bioconjugate Chem. 29, 267–274 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Shurygina, M. P., Kurskii, Y. A., Chesnokov, S. A. & Abakumov, G. A. Products of photoreduction of 9,10-phenanthrenequinone in the presence of N,N-dimethylanilines and polymethylbenzenes. Tetrahedron 64, 1459–1466 (2008).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Shurygina, M. P., Kurskii, Y. A., Druzhkov, N. O., Chesnokov, S. A. & Abakumov, G. A. Products and mechanisms of photochemical transformations of o-quinones. High Energy Chem. 44, 234–238 (2010).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. March, J. Advanced Organic Chemistry: Reactions, Mechanisms, and Structure, 3rd edn (Wiley, 1985).

  42. Brown, H. C., McDaniel, D. H. & Häfliger, O. in Determination of Organic Structures by Physical Methods Vol 4. (eds Nachod, F. C. & Zuckerman, J. J.) (Academic Press, 1971).

  43. Shelley, J. C. et al. Epik: a software program for pK(a) prediction and protonation state generation for drug-like molecules. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 21, 681–691 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Greenwood, J. R., Calkins, D., Sullivan, A. P. & Shelley, J. C. Towards the comprehensive, rapid, and accurate prediction of the favorable tautomeric states of drug-like molecules in aqueous solution. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 24, 591–604 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Richard, J. A. et al. Latent fluorophores based on a self-immolative linker strategy and suitable for protease sensing. Bioconjugate Chem. 19, 1707–1718 (2008).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Shamis, M. & Shabat, D. Single-triggered AB6 self-immolative dendritic amplifiers. Chem. Eur. J. 13, 4523–4528 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Chau, Y. P., Shiah, S. G., Don, M. J. & Kuo, M. L. Involvement of hydrogen peroxide in topoisomerase inhibitor beta-lapachone-induced apoptosis and differentiation in human leukemia cells. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 24, 660–670 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Rodrigues, T. et al. Machine intelligence decrypts β-lapachone as an allosteric 5-lipoxygenase inhibitor. Chem. Sci. 9, 6899–6903 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Dubowchik, G. M. et al. Cathepsin B-labile dipeptide linkers for lysosomal release of doxorubicin from internalizing immunoconjugates: model studies of enzymatic drug release and antigen-specific in vitro anticancer activity. Bioconjugate Chem. 13, 855–869 (2002).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Poole, B. & Ohkuma, S. Effect of weak bases on the intralysosomal pH in mouse peritoneal macrophages. J. Cell Biol. 90, 665–669 (1981).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Tamai, M. et al. In vitro and in vivo inhibition of cysteine proteinases by EST, a new analog of E-64. J. Pharmacobiodyn. 9, 672–677 (1986).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Yu, C. et al. Lysosome dysfunction enhances oxidative stress-induced apoptosis through ubiquitinated protein accumulation in HeLa cells. Anat. Rec. 296, 31–39 (2013).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Poreba, M. Protease-activated prodrugs: strategies, challenges, and future directions. FEBS J. 287, 1936–1969 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Aggarwal, N. & Sloane, B. F. Cathepsin B: multiple roles in cancer. Proteomics Clin. Appl. 8, 427–437 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Cairns, R. A., Harris, I. S. & Mak, T. W. Regulation of cancer cell metabolism. Nat. Rev. Cancer 11, 85–95 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Kell, J. Considerations and challenges for patients with refractory and relapsed acute myeloid leukaemia. Leuk. Res. 47, 149–160 (2016).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Saultz, J. N. & Garzon, R. Acute myeloid leukemia: a concise review. J. Clin. Med. 5, 33 (2016).

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Vetrie, D., Helgason, G. V. & Copland, M. The leukaemia stem cell: similarities, differences and clinical prospects in CML and AML. Nat. Rev. Cancer 20, 158–173 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Prieto-Bermejo, R., Romo-González, M., Pérez-Fernández, A., Ijurko, C. & Hernández-Hernández, Á. Reactive oxygen species in haematopoiesis: leukaemic cells take a walk on the wild side. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 37, 125 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Miller, W. H. Jr., Schipper, H. M., Lee, J. S., Singer, J. & Waxman, S. Mechanisms of action of arsenic trioxide. Cancer Res. 62, 3893–3903 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Sinha, B. K. & Mason, R. P. Is metabolic activation of topoisomerase II poisons important in the mechanism of cytotoxicity? J. Drug Metab. Toxicol. 6, 186 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Roos, J. et al. 5-Lipoxygenase Is a candidate target for therapeutic management of stem cell-like cells in acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer Res. 74, 5244–5255 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Chen, Y., Hu, Y., Zhang, H., Peng, C. & Li, S. Loss of the Alox5 gene impairs leukemia stem cells and prevents chronic myeloid leukemia. Nat. Genet. 41, 783–792 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Kovtun, Y. et al. IMGN779, a novel CD33-targeting antibody–drug conjugate with DNA-alkylating activity, exhibits potent antitumor activity in models of AML. Mol. Cancer Ther. 17, 1271–1279 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Senter, P. D. & Sievers, E. L. The discovery and development of brentuximab vedotin for use in relapsed Hodgkin lymphoma and systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 631–637 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Bernardim, B. et al. Stoichiometric and irreversible cysteine-selective protein modification using carbonylacrylic reagents. Nat. Commun. 7, 13128–13128 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Bernardim, B. et al. Efficient and irreversible antibody–cysteine bioconjugation using carbonylacrylic reagents. Nat. Protoc. 14, 86–99 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Lerchen, H. G. et al. Antibody–prodrug conjugates with KSP inhibitors and legumain-mediated metabolite formation. Chem. Eur. J. 25, 8208–8213 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Lyon, R. P. et al. Reducing hydrophobicity of homogeneous antibody–drug conjugates improves pharmacokinetics and therapeutic index. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 733–735 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Pyzik, M. et al. The neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn): a misnomer? Front. Immunol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.01540 (2019).

  71. Kalim, M. et al. Intracellular trafficking of new anticancer therapeutics: antibody–drug conjugates. Drug Des. Devel. Ther. 11, 2265–2276 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Ritchie, M., Tchistiakova, L. & Scott, N. Implications of receptor-mediated endocytosis and intracellular trafficking dynamics in the development of antibody drug conjugates. mAbs 5, 13–21 (2013).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Appelbaum, F. R. & Bernstein, I. D. Gemtuzumab ozogamicin for acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 130, 2373–2376 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Stein, E. M. & Tallman, M. S. Emerging therapeutic drugs for AML. Blood 127, 71–78 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Cini, E. et al. Antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) charged with HDAC inhibitor for targeted epigenetic modulation. Chem. Sci. 9, 6490–6496 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Mecklenburg, L. A brief introduction to antibody–drug conjugates for toxicologic pathologists. Toxicol. Pathol. 46, 746–752 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. da Silva Júnior, E. N. et al. Synthesis of quinones with highlighted biological applications: a critical update on the strategies towards bioactive compounds with emphasis on lapachones. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 179, 863–915 (2019).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Johnston, P. A. et al. Development of a 384-well colorimetric assay to quantify hydrogen peroxide generated by the redox cycling of compounds in the presence of reducing agents. Assay Drug Dev. Technol. 6, 505–518 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Fischer, L., Szellas, D., Rådmark, O., Steinhilber, D. & Werz, O. Phosphorylation- and stimulus-dependent inhibition of cellular 5-lipoxygenase activity by nonredox-type inhibitors. FASEB J. 17, 949–951 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Steinhilber, D., Herrmann, T. & Roth, H. J. Separation of lipoxins and leukotrienes from human granulocytes by high-performance liquid chromatography with a Radial-Pak cartridge after extraction with an octadecyl reversed-phase column. J. Chromatogr. 493, 361–366 (1989).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Lu, X. et al. Deamidation and isomerization liability analysis of 131 clinical-stage antibodies. MAbs 11, 45–57 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Queen, C. L. & Selick, H. E. Humanized immunoglobulins. US patent US5585089A (1996).

  83. Hamann, P. R. et al. Conjugates of methyltrithio antitumor agents and intermediates for their synthesis. US patent US5773001A (1998).

  84. Daramola, O. et al. A high-yielding CHO transient system: Coexpression of genes encoding EBNA-1 and GS enhances transient protein expression. Biotechnol. Progress 30, 132–141 (2014).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Putnam, W. C., Kallem, R. R., Subramaniyan, I., Beg, M. S. & Edpuganti, V. Bioanalytical method development and validation of a liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry method for determination of β-lapachone in human plasma. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 188, 113466 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. M. J. Frisch, et al. Gaussian 16 Rev. C.01. (Gaussian, 2016).

  87. Zhao, Y. & Truhlar, D. G. The M06 suite of density functionals for main group thermochemistry, thermochemical kinetics, noncovalent interactions, excited states, and transition elements: two new functionals and systematic testing of four M06-class functionals and 12 other functionals. Theor. Chem. Account 120, 215–241 (2008).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Scalmani, G. & Frisch, M. J. Continuous surface charge polarizable continuum models of solvation. I. General formalism. J. Chem. Phys. 132, 114110 (2010).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Ribeiro, R. F., Marenich, A. V., Cramer, C. J. & Truhlar, D. G. Use of solution-phase vibrational frequencies in continuum models for the free energy of solvation. J. Phys. Chem. B 115, 14556–14562 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Gonzalez, C. & Schlegel, H. B. An improved algorithm for reaction path following. J. Chem. Phys. 90, 2154–2161 (1989).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. Gonzalez, C. & Schlegel, H. B. Reaction path following in mass-weighted internal coordinates. J. Phys. Chem. 94, 5523–5527 (1990).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. Chai, J.-D. & Head-Gordon, M. Long-range corrected hybrid density functionals with damped atom–atom dispersion corrections. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 10, 6615–6620 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Marenich, A. V., Cramer, C. J. & Truhlar, D. G. Universal solvation model based on solute electron density and on a continuum model of the solvent defined by the bulk dielectric constant and atomic surface tensions. J. Phys. Chem. B 113, 6378–6396 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreements number 812994, 852985 and 792495. We also acknowledge Agencia Estatal Investigacion of Spain (AEI; grant RTI2018-099592-B-C22 to G.J.-O.), Severo Ochoa Excellence Accreditation (SEV-2016-0644 to CIC bioGUNE), Cancer Research UK (C9685/A25117 to I.B.) and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation, project ID 239748522–SFB 1127 to O.W.). We thank UKRI for a BBSRC DTP studentship for L.D. (BB/M011194/1), the Herchel Smith Fund and FCT Portugal for PhD studentships for J.B. and A.G., respectively, and Fundación Alfonso Martín Escudero for E.G.M.’s postdoctoral funding. We thank L. Mendil and R. Houghton for performing quantitative LC-MS/MS analysis of BL in mouse tissue. We thank V. Cantrill for her help with the editing of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

L.D. and G.J.L.B. conceived the study. L.D. performed chemical syntheses, aqueous kinetics studies, kinetic NMR experiments, antibody conjugations, LC–MS analysis and in vitro and cellular tests with protected quinone models, prodrugs and ADCs. C.D.N. and G.J.-O performed molecular simulations of protected ortho-quinones. A.G. performed in vivo studies. E.G.d.M. performed chemical synthesis, NMR analysis and antibody conjugations. J.B. performed chemical synthesis, NMR analysis and aqueous kinetics studies. L.B. and V.Z. performed expression of antibodies. E.M. performed LC–MS analysis of unmodified antibodies. E.S. performed bio-layer interferometry binding studies. E.H. performed native-MS and assisted with kinetic NMR spectroscopy experiments. S.M., L.D. and I.B. performed 5-LO shRNA knockdown experiments. J.C. and L.D. performed 5-LO CRISPR-Cas9 knockout experiments. S.L. performed 5-LO inhibition experiments. P.R., G.V., O.W., T.R. and F.P.d.C. contributed to analysis and discussions. L.D. and G.J.L.B. wrote the manuscript with contributions from all authors.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Gonzalo Jiménez-Osés or Gonçalo J. L. Bernardes.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

P.R., V.Z., E.S. and E.M. are or were formerly employed by AstraZeneca plc. L.D., J.B., E.G.d.M. and G.J.L.B. are inventors on a patent application (GB2207691.3) that incorporates discoveries described in this manuscript. T.R. and G.J.L.B. are inventors on a patent that describes the discovery of the allosteric inhibition of 5-LO by β-lapachone (PCT/PT2018/050029), which is related to parts of the work related in this manuscript. The authors of this article declare that V. Cantrill, who was involved with the editing of this article, is employed by G.J.L.B. as a research coordinator at the University of Cambridge. V. Cantrill is married to S. Cantrill, who is the Chief Editor of Nature Chemistry. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher Note: The editorial team of Nature Chemistry declare that Stuart Cantrill has had no involvement in the editorial handling of this article.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Chemistry thanks Thomas Pillow, Raphaël Rodriguez and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Additional in vitro assays of the benzyl ketol protection unit.

a, (i) Concentration-dependent in vitro methaemoglobin generation by 1, (ii) appearance of methaemoglobin peak at 630 nm for samples at 100 µM. Line represents mean values, with dotted borders representing ± SEM (n = 3). This experiment was repeated once with similar results. b, Toxicity of 1, 24 and 25 to cancer cell lines: HL-60 (acute myeloid leukaemia), HeLa (endocervical adenocarcinoma) and HCT-116 (colon carcinoma). Data are presented as mean values fit to 4-PL model with error bars representing ± SEM (n = 3). These experiments were replicated once with similar results. c, Viability of leukaemia cell line MOLM-13 at 24 h timepoints following treatment with peptide prodrugs at 5 µM compared to compounds 1 and 29. Values are mean normalised cell viability from three biological replicates ± SEM (n = 9). d, Lysosome deacidification and inhibition assay in HL-60 over 24 h. Significant difference marked: paired two-tailed t test for 26, untreated vs. NH4Cl 30 mM treated viability: p = 0.0199. Bar height displays mean values from one representative experiment with error bar displaying ± SEM (n = 3).

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Synthetic procedures, Supplementary Figs. 1–112, Schemes 1–10, Tables 1–6 and Discussion.

Reporting Summary

Source data

Source Data Fig. 3

Excel used to generate 3a.

Source Data Fig. 4

Excel containing all experimental data for 4c.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dunsmore, L., Navo, C.D., Becher, J. et al. Controlled masking and targeted release of redox-cycling ortho-quinones via a C–C bond-cleaving 1,6-elimination. Nat. Chem. 14, 754–765 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-022-00964-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-022-00964-7

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing