Abstract
The atomic-thick anticorrosion coating for copper (Cu) electrodes is essential for the miniaturisation in the semiconductor industry. Graphene has long been expected to be the ultimate anticorrosion material, however, its real anticorrosion performance is still under great controversy. Specifically, strong electronic couplings can limit the interfacial diffusion of corrosive molecules, whereas they can also promote the surficial galvanic corrosion. Here, we report the enhanced anticorrosion for Cu simply via a bilayer graphene coating, which provides protection for more than 5 years at room temperature and 1000 h at 200 °C. Such excellent anticorrosion is attributed to a nontrivial Janus-doping effect in bilayer graphene, where the heavily doped bottom layer forms a strong interaction with Cu to limit the interfacial diffusion, while the nearly charge neutral top layer behaves inertly to alleviate the galvanic corrosion. Our study will likely expand the application scenarios of Cu under various extreme operating conditions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Cu is widely used in the modern semiconductor industry as electrical connectors due to its high conductivity1,2,3,4,5. However, the susceptibility of Cu to oxidation greatly limits its advanced applications6. For example, Cu will lose more than 99.99999% of its electrical conductivity at 200 °C in air for only 30 min7. Conventional organic coating8 and sacrificial anode9 anticorrosion techniques have made significant success in traditional industries, unfortunately, these methods typically rely on a thick coating and fail to comply with the miniaturisation requirements of the integrated circuits industry1,2. Currently, the rise of two-dimensional (2D) materials has provided new opportunities for the development of anticorrosion technology10,11,12. Graphene, in particular, has emerged as a promising candidate for an ultimate anticorrosion coating due to its excellent characteristics at the atomic thickness, including absolute impermeability, high electrical and thermal conductivity, excellent chemical stability, and great optical transparency13,14,15. However, previous studies have shown that the anticorrosion performance of graphene is far from satisfactory under real working conditions, especially in complex and diverse environments16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29, which limits its application to an early stage.
In principle, an ideal anticorrosion coating material should comply with three requirements: (i) intrinsically, being impermeable to corrosive agents and having low penetrating defect density; (ii) interfacially, being tightly coupled with metal to prevent further horizontal diffusion once corrosive agents reach the interface, and (iii) surficially, being electrically inert to prevent electrochemically facilitated corrosion reactions. A defect-free graphene film naturally fulfils the first requirement, but it generally fails to meet the interfacial and surficial ones. First, the easily formed wrinkles on graphene and intrinsic step bunches on Cu allow for the diffusion of corrosive molecules at the interface13,22,23. Second, graphene is cathodic to most metals and will lead to local galvanic reaction21,24. As a result, corrosive molecules will interact with the free electrons on graphene surface and thus accelerate the electrochemical corrosion process25,26,27,28. Recently, efforts have been made to enhance the graphene-Cu couplings to prevent interfacial molecular diffusion, for example, by forming a commensurate graphene/Cu(111) system15,30 or producing an ultra-flat Cu surface13. However, these methods impose overly restrictive limitations on Cu or graphene and still cannot address the electrochemical corrosion issue. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop a robust and effective anticorrosion strategy for graphene coating that can address all those three requirements.
Here, we utilized a bilayer graphene coating and investigated its enhanced anticorrosion performance for Cu17,18,19,20,31. It is found that the bilayer coating strategy not only integrates the advantages of the monolayer (impermeability, stability, and optical transparency), but also demonstrates excellent prospects far beyond expectation (with a Janus-doping effect for improved anticorrosion). Specifically, it can simultaneously satisfy the demands of both reinforcing the graphene-Cu interactions to limit interfacial molecular diffusion and maintaining the intrinsic charge neutrality of the top layer graphene to suppress surficial electrochemical reactions (Fig. 1a).
Results and discussion
In our experiments, we first obtained a large (~7\(\times\)7 cm2) arbitrary-twisted bilayer graphene coating on Cu by wet transfer method (see Methods for more details). After being oxidized at 250 °C for 6 hours, the monolayer graphene coated Cu quickly deteriorated and turned black (the colour of Cu oxide, CuxO), whereas the bilayer coated area maintained the initial Cu state with shining metallic lustre (Fig. 1b), demonstrating an enhanced anticorrosion performance. We also tracked a Cu foil with directly grown bilayer domains for a long-term storage, and the results showed that bilayer graphene could effectively protect the underneath Cu from oxidation for more than five years (Fig. 1c). In contrast, the monolayer graphene coated Cu had already been oxidized with an obvious CuxO layer, as shown in the optical images and the Raman spectra (Fig. 1c, d).
Cross-sectional scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) images further confirmed that the CuxO layer only formed in the monolayer graphene coated region, while no oxide was observed in the bilayer coated area, even on the bunched Cu steps (Fig. 1e and Supplementary Fig. 1). Previous studies have shown that the oxidation process typically involves stepped surfaces, where corrosive molecules might diffuse along the bunched Cu steps to form oxides13,32. However, our results demonstrated that even on a highly stepped high-index surface, the bilayer graphene coating could still effectively protect Cu (Supplementary Fig. 2). More interestingly, the anticorrosion performance of the bilayer coating is found to be independent of the twist angle (Supplementary Fig. 3), regardless of whether the twisting was introduced by the direct growth or the transfer process (see Methods for more details). Furthermore, to investigate the anticorrosion performance of bilayer graphene in the presence of water, we performed wet-oxidation tests at 150 °C with an environment of 70% relative humidity and at 80 °C with the sample immersed in water (Supplementary Fig. 4). Both experiments demonstrated the enhanced anticorrosion properties of bilayer graphene to monolayer ones.
To quantitatively evaluate the improved Cu anticorrosion performance of bilayer graphene, we continually monitored and recorded the corrosion process. After exposure to air at 200 °C, monolayer graphene coated Cu gradually oxidized, and more than 70% area of Cu deteriorated after 15 days. In contrast, bilayer graphene coated Cu barely oxidized throughout the entire oxidation period (Fig. 2a and Supplementary Fig. 5). We further constructed a two-step defect formation and expansion model33,34 (see Methods for more details), and deduced from the model that bilayer graphene could effectively protect Cu for more than 1000 h at 200 °C, while monolayer graphene only works for ~36 h (the breakdown limit is defined as having a 5% corroded area, Fig. 2b). This enhanced protection property of bilayer graphene was then thoroughly confirmed by oxidation experiments carried out at different temperatures (Fig. 2b and Supplementary Fig. 5). By fitting these results with the above model, the oxidation rate (K) of bilayer graphene is confirmed to be orders of magnitude lower than that of monolayer graphene (e.g., 4.5 × 10-14 h-3 versus 1.2 × 10-8 h-3 at 200 °C, see detailed comparisons in Supplementary Table 1). Then the oxidation energy barriers (E) were readily estimated from the Arrhenius equation35,36 (Fig. 2c), i.e., 6.88 eV for bilayer graphene and 4.60 eV for monolayer case, confirming the significantly enhanced anticorrosion performance of bilayer graphene coating.
To have a more comprehensive understanding of oxidation behaviours at the graphene–Cu interface, we utilized a combination of in situ methods. First, we used atomic force microscopy (AFM) to track the evolution of the penetrating defects on graphene film (Fig. 2d–f and Supplementary Fig. 6). After being heated at 250 °C in air, point defects on monolayer graphene quickly expanded outward, whereas those in the bilayer graphene-coated region primarily grew in the vertical direction and formed a sharp cliff. These observations demonstrated that even if defects exist on the bilayer graphene, the interfacial diffusion of corrosive molecules at the graphene–Cu interface can be sufficiently suppressed, preventing the adjacent graphene layer from being further damaged.
Furthermore, the oxidation process under extreme working conditions was investigated by in situ environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM), which allowed for real-time observations with an oxygen pressure of 150 Pa, a hydrogen pressure of 80 Pa, and a temperature of 600 °C. Under such oxygen-rich and high-temperature conditions, monolayer graphene could not withstand even one second of exposure (Fig. 3a). In contrast, the full oxidation of bilayer graphene-coated Cu took more than 120 min (Fig. 3a–f). Moreover, by tracking the corroded area, a colour-coded time-lapse image stack was obtained to depict the anticorrosion behaviour of the overlayers (Fig. 3g and Supplementary Movie 1). We can obtain that the oxidation of bilayer graphene coated Cu mainly started from the monolayer-bilayer graphene joint interface, and the expansion of the surface oxide towards the bilayer coated region was extremely slow, at a rate of only ~20 nm/min along in-plane direction.
Then, near ambient pressure X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (NAP-XPS) was carried out to gain insight into the chemical state of Cu during oxidation. As the oxidation progressed at 150 °C, the satellite peak and Auger peak of Cu2O became increasingly prominent, proving the chemical state of Cu has risen from 0 to +1 (Fig. 3h, i). Notably, the Cu0 signal persisted throughout the entire oxidation process (Fig. 3i), demonstrating that a portion of Cu has been well protected. To identify the space distribution of the oxidized area, the same sample was then directly transferred into ESEM chamber to perform the energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) characterization. The results showed that the OKα peak diminished as the graphene layer number increased, indicating that Cu only survived under the protection of bilayer graphene (Fig. 3j). These findings were further supported by the time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (ToF-SIMS) analyses, where oxygen species were only detected on the monolayer coated region (Fig. 3k and Supplementary Fig. 7). By combining various in situ methods, detailed chemical state information could be integrated with visual observations in real-space at variable magnifications, confirming the effectiveness of the bilayer graphene coating strategy.
We further utilized first-principles calculations to understand the ultrahigh anticorrosion performance in the bilayer graphene/Cu system (Supplementary Fig. 8, and see Methods for more details). The electron density difference (\(\Delta \rho\)) before and after graphene coating was first calculated (\(\Delta \rho={\rho }_{{Cu}+{Gr}}-{\rho }_{{Cu}}-{\rho }_{{Gr}}\), where \({\rho }_{{Cu}+{Gr}}\), \({\rho }_{{Cu}}\), and \({\rho }_{{Gr}}\) are the electron densities of graphene coated Cu, bare Cu, and free-standing graphene, respectively). The results show that the electron redistribution between Cu and the bottom layer of bilayer graphene is more prominent, indicating a strengthened interaction at the bilayer graphene-Cu interface. Moreover, there is insignificant electron density variation around the top layer graphene, demonstrating that the top layer is minimally affected by the Cu substrate and exhibits a near charge neutrality state (Fig. 4a). We have also performed the adsorption energy calculations, and confirm that bilayer graphene exhibits a stronger binding to Cu (Supplementary Fig. 9) and a reduced adsorption of corrosive molecules (Supplementary Fig. 10)16,37,38. Based on these findings, we propose that the bilayer graphene/Cu system demonstrates a Janus-doped characteristic, where the bottom layer is heavily doped and forms an enhanced interaction with Cu which limits the interfacial diffusion and migration of corrosive molecules, while the top layer is nearly charge neutral, thus can cut off the electron pathway and block the catastrophic electrochemical reactions. By successfully manipulating the electronic structures of the two layers, both the interfacial diffusion and surficial electrochemical reaction pathways are suppressed, finally resulting in the ultraslow corrosion of Cu.
The proposed mechanism was verified by comprehensive electronic structure characterizations. First, the Kelvin probe force microscopy (KPFM) measurements revealed that the surface potential of bilayer graphene on Cu was ~135 mV higher than that of monolayer graphene (Fig. 4b, c), indicating a heavier electron doping effect in bilayer graphene14,17. Then, electronic band structure calculations and nanoscale angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (nano-ARPES) experiments were performed to investigate the detailed electronic structures. The calculation results demonstrate an energy shift between the Dirac point and the Fermi surface in the graphene/Cu system, and the shift of the bottom layer graphene is significantly larger than that of the monolayer (Fig. 4d for monolayer case and Fig. 4e, f for bilayer case). This shift was experimentally confirmed by nano-ARPES to be 0.27 eV for the bottom layer, and only 0.15 eV for the monolayer (Fig. 4g, h and Supplementary Fig. 11). According to the relationship between Fermi level (\({E}_{F}\)) and carrier density (\(n\)) in graphene, \({E}_{F}(n)=\hslash \left|{v}_{F}\right|\sqrt{\pi n}\) (where \(\hslash\) is the reduced Planck constant and \({v}_{F}\) is the Fermi velocity39), such an upshift of \({E}_{F}\) indicates a ~3 times heavier electron doping in the bottom layer (~4.4 × 1012 cm-2 versus ~1.4 × 1012 cm-2). This evident doping effect leads to a strengthened interaction between bottom graphene and Cu, thus effectively blocking the interfacial diffusion pathway for corrosive agents at the graphene-Cu interface (Fig. 1a).
In the case of substantial electron transfer for monolayer coating, graphene is more likely to provide electrons to corrosive agents, and its high electrical conductivity will provide a channel for electrons to migrate on the surface and participate in the cathodic reactions. Regarding the top layer of bilayer graphene, both our calculations and nano-ARPES results confirm that there are negligible electrons transferring onto the top layer (Fig. 4f, i). Such an inert top layer will hardly motivate the surficial galvanic reactions of corrosive molecules, thus efficiently reducing the electrochemical reaction rates. Therefore, the cathodic reaction at the surface is greatly suppressed (Fig. 1a), which contributes to the enhanced anticorrosion performance of the bilayer graphene coating.
With the facile Janus-doped bilayer graphene coating design, we were able to achieve robust and effective anticorrosion performance for Cu that was three orders of magnitude better than the industrial standard recommendation (1000 h protection vs 1 h protection in air at 200 °C)5. As a further demonstration, we transferred bilayer graphene coatings onto Cu conductors on a printed circuit board (PCB). After annealing at 120 °C for 20 h, the bilayer graphene successfully protected the Cu conductors with no visible signs of oxidation (Supplementary Fig. 12). The remarkably improved anticorrosion ability of the atomic-thick graphene coating paves the way for the integrated applications of Cu in harsh environments, and creates significant opportunities for the miniaturisation of the next-generation electronic and optoelectronic devices.
Methods
Preparation of Cu with bilayer graphene coating
Bilayer graphene coated Cu samples are prepared in two ways. The first one is using the typical wet transfer method, and the bilayer coating area can be on the decimetre scale. Specifically, 8% polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) in anisole solution was spin-coated onto the surface of the as-grown monolayer graphene/Cu sample and then the sample was baked at 120 °C for 2 min. Then the Cu was etched by 0.2 mol L-1 (NH4)2S2O8 solution in a water tank. After that the obtained free-standing PMMA/graphene film was smoothly placed onto another as-grown monolayer graphene/Cu without deliberately controlling the twisted angle. Finally, the obtained PMMA/bilayer graphene/Cu sample was baked at 80 °C for 10 min and then annealed in Ar and H2 atmosphere at 400 °C for 10 h. The second way is using the typical chemical vapour deposition (CVD) growth method, and these bilayer domains are of several tens of micrometres. In detail, a Cu foil was first placed on a quartz substrate and loaded into the CVD furnace. Then the system was heated to 1040 °C under a reducing atmosphere of 500 standard cubic centimetres per minute (sccm) Ar and 30 sccm H2. After holding at 1040 °C for 1 hour, 0.05 sccm/50 sccm of CH4/H2 was introduced into the system for 10–30 min to obtain bilayer graphene on Cu.
Oxidation experiments
The oxidation experiments were carried out by baking the samples in a CVD chamber in air at 120–275 °C for up to 15 days. The room temperature oxidation experiments were carried out in Beijing with the temperature controlled within 20–30 °C and the relative humidity controlled between 30 and 50%.
Characterization
Optical images were obtained using an Olympus BX51 microscope. Raman spectra were obtained with a Witec alpha 300 R system with a laser excitation wavelength of 514 nm. EBSD characterizations were carried out using PHI 710 Scanning Auger Nanoprobe. AFM images were acquired using a Bruker Dimensional ICON system under ambient conditions. KPFM measurements were performed using Asylum Research Cypher under ambient conditions. Depth resolution mass spectra were conducted on a ToF-SIMS 5–100 instrument (ION-ToF GmbH), which relates to a UHV preparation chamber. The primary ion source uses Bi+ cluster at 30 keV with an incidence angle of 45°. The dual sputtering beam uses Cs+ cluster at 500 V and 27 nA with an incidence angle of 45°. The ARPES measurements were performed at the nano ARPES beamline BL07U of the Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility, with a beam spot size of ~500 nm and energy/momentum resolution of 50 meV per 0.2°. Graphene sample was measured in an ultrahigh vacuum with a base pressure of more than 5 × 10-11 mbar and photon energy of 91 eV, and the data were collected by DA30L analysers. NAP-XPS was performed on a system which is manufactured by SPECS Surface Nano Analysis GmbH. The facility is composed of three chambers, an analysis chamber, a preparation chamber, and a load-lock chamber. The X-ray source in the vacuum environment is separated from the high-pressure analysis chamber using a Si3N4 window. The analysis chamber is equipped with a PHOIBOS NAP hemispherical electron energy analyser, a microfocus monochromatized Al Kα X-ray source with beam size of 300 μm, a SPECS IQE-11A ion gun, and an infrared laser heater. The base pressure of the main chamber is kept below 1 × 10-9 mbar.
In situ observations by ESEM
The in situ experiments were conducted in a specially modified commercial ESEM (Thermo Fisher Quattro-s), using oil-free pre-vacuum pumps for the vacuum system, a homemade laser heating stage for temperature control, and a K-type thermocouple for temperature monitoring. A gas supply module facilitated by mass flow controllers (Bronkhorst) was employed, together with a mass spectrometer (Pfeiffer OmniStar) to analyse the atmosphere in the chamber. Prior to the experiments, the ESEM chamber was cleaned using plasma. The acceleration voltage was set between 3.0 and 7.5 kV, and images were captured using a large field detector. Throughout the experiments, no influence of the electron beam on the oxidation process was detected.
Modelling of oxidation
We divide the oxidation of Cu into two processes, the first is the formation of graphene point defects, at a rate \(\dot{N}\) per unit area; and the second is the defect expansion, at a rate \(\dot{G}\). The expansion of defect is assumed to be isotropic here. Considering that the oxidized areas will stop expanding when they contact with each other, the fitting formula follows the Avrami equation of \(Y=1-\exp \left(-K{(t+{t}_{0})}^{3}\right)\) and \(K=\pi \dot{N}{\dot{G}}^{2}/3\), where \(Y\) is the oxidized ratio, \({t}_{0}\) is the initial oxidation level. Here, \(\dot{N}\) and \(\dot{G}\) follows the Arrhenius equation: \(\dot{N}\propto \exp (-{E}_{1}/{kT})\) and \(\dot{G}\propto \exp (-{E}_{2}/{kT})\), where \({E}_{1}\) is the barrier of the formation of point defects, and \({E}_{2}\) is the barrier of defects expansion. Thus, we can derive that the oxidation rate \(K\propto \exp (-({{E}_{1}+2E}_{2})/{kT})\). By a linear fit of \({{{{\rm{ln}}}}}K\) to \(1/T\), we can derive the total barrier \(E={{E}_{1}+2E}_{2}\) from the slope of the fitting.
First-principles calculation
The calculations were carried out using Vienna ab initio simulation package (VASP)40. The interaction between the valance electrons and ion core were described by the projector augmented wave (PAW) method41,42. The exchange-correlation potential was formulated by the generalised gradient approximation (GGA) with the Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (PBE) scheme43. The kinetic energy cut-off of plane wave basis is set to 417 eV. First, the bulk Cu was relaxed until the force is less than 0.02 eV/Å, and the obtained primitive lattice constant is 2.5412 Å, which is about 3% mismatch of the graphene lattice constant (2.46 Å). This relaxed Cu lattice constant was employed in the following calculations. The Cu substrate was cleaved from the bulk phase with three Cu atom layers. The bottom two layers are fixed to simulate bulk Cu, while the topmost Cu layer and bilayer graphene are relaxed until the force less than 0.02 eV/Å. As determined from the ARPES results, the bilayer graphene has ~27.5° rotation, therefore, a superlattice matrix \(\left[\begin{array}{cc}13 & 6\\ -6 & 7\end{array}\right]\) was employed to construct the top graphene. For the bottom graphene and Cu substrate, a 11 × 11 superlattice is applied to fit the graphene layer. For the graphene dispersion and Fermi surface simulation, the Brillouin zone unfolding was employed44,45. The adsorption energy was calculated by \(\Delta E={E}_{{Sub}+{Ads}}-{E}_{{Sub}}-{E}_{{Ads}}\), where\(\,{E}_{{Sub}+{Ads}}\), \({E}_{{Sub}}\), and \({E}_{{Ads}}\) are the total energy of substrate with adsorbate, bare substrate, and adsorbate, respectively. In the calculation of corrosive molecule adsorption, one oxygen or water molecule was put on Cu. The initial top, hollow, and bridge adsorption sites were employed, and the lowest energy configurations were adopted after full relaxation.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available within the paper and Supplementary Information. Additional data are available from the corresponding authors upon request.
References
Peng, J. et al. Surface coordination layer passivates oxidation of copper. Nature 586, 390–394 (2020).
Kim, S. J. et al. Flat-surface-assisted and self-regulated oxidation resistance of Cu(111). Nature 603, 434–438 (2022).
Rueda, A., Sedlmeir, F., Kumari, M., Leuchs, G. & Schwefel, H. G. L. Resonant electro-optic frequency comb. Nature 568, 378–381 (2019).
Gebrael, T. et al. High-efficiency cooling via the monolithic integration of copper on electronic devices. Nat. Electron. 5, 394–402 (2022).
Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of the People’s Republic of China. Catalogue of the demonstration guidance of the first batch application for key new materials, https://www.miit.gov.cn/jgsj/ycls/wjfb/art/2021/art_88d8a7bbcc904dd98f5cb1d8e7dadac3.html (2021).
Marcus, P. Corrosion mechanisms in theory and practice (CRC Press, 2012).
Figueiredo, V. et al. Effect of post-annealing on the properties of copper oxide thin films obtained from the oxidation of evaporated metallic copper. Appl. Surf. Sci. 254, 3949–3954 (2008).
Jones, F. N., Nichols, M. E. & Pappas, S. P. Organic coatings: science and technology (John Wiley & Sons, 2017).
Von Baeckmann, W., Schwenk, W. & Prinz, W. Handbook of cathodic corrosion protection: Theory and practice of electrochemical protection processes (Gulf Pub. Co., 1997).
Khan, M. H. et al. Atomically thin hexagonal boron nitride nanofilm for Cu protection: the importance of film perfection. Adv. Mater. 29, 1603937 (2017).
Prasai, D. et al. Graphene: corrosion-inhibiting coating. ACS Nano 6, 1102–1108 (2012).
Chen, S. et al. Oxidation resistance of graphene-coated Cu and Cu/Ni alloy. ACS Nano 5, 1321–1327 (2011).
Luo, D. et al. The wet-oxidation of a Cu(111) foil coated by single crystal graphene. Adv. Mater. 33, 2102697 (2021).
Zhao, Z. et al. Polycrystalline few-layer graphene as a durable anticorrosion film for copper. Nano Lett. 21, 1161–1168 (2021).
Xu, X. et al. Greatly enhanced anticorrosion of Cu by commensurate graphene coating. Adv. Mater. 30, 1702944 (2018).
Montemore, M. M., van Spronsen, M. A., Madix, R. J. & Friend, C. M. O2 activation by metal surfaces: implications for bonding and reactivity on heterogeneous catalysts. Chem. Rev. 118, 2816–2862 (2018).
Ziegler, D. et al. Variations in the work function of doped single- and few-layer graphene assessed by Kelvin probe force microscopy and density functional theory. Phys. Rev. B 83, 235434 (2011).
Zheng, J. et al. Interfacial properties of bilayer and trilayer graphene on metal substrates. Sci. Rep. 3, 2081 (2013).
Khan, E., Rahman, T. S. & Subrina, S. Electronic structure of bilayer graphene physisorbed on metal substrates. J. Appl. Phys. 120, 185101 (2016).
Khomyakov, P. A. et al. First-principles study of the interaction and charge transfer between graphene and metals. Phys. Rev. B 79, 195425 (2009).
Schriver, M. et al. Graphene as a long-term metal oxidation barrier: worse than nothing. ACS Nano 7, 5763–5768 (2013).
Kidambi, P. R. et al. Observing graphene grow: catalyst-graphene interactions during scalable graphene growth on polycrystalline copper. Nano Lett. 13, 4769–4778 (2013).
Weatherup, R. S. et al. Long-term passivation of strongly interacting metals with single-layer graphene. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 14358–14366 (2015).
Cui, C., Lim, A. T. O. & Huang, J. A cautionary note on graphene anti-corrosion coatings. Nat. Nanotechnol. 12, 834–835 (2017).
Zhou, F., Li, Z., Shenoy, G. J., Li, L. & Liu, H. Enhanced room-temperature corrosion of copper in the presence of graphene. ACS Nano 7, 6939–6947 (2013).
Sheng, Z. H. et al. Catalyst-free synthesis of nitrogen-doped graphene via thermal annealing graphite oxide with melamine and its excellent electrocatalysis. ACS Nano 5, 4350–4358 (2011).
Zheng, Y., Jiao, Y., Ge, L., Jaroniec, M. & Qiao, S. Z. Two-step boron and nitrogen doping in graphene for enhanced synergistic catalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 52, 3110–3116 (2013).
Varykhalov, A., Scholz, M. R., Kim, T. K. & Rader, O. Effect of noble-metal contacts on doping and band gap of graphene. Phys. Rev. B 82 (2010).
Chung, K. et al. Non-oxidized bare copper nanoparticles with surface excess electrons in air. Nat. Nanotechnol. 17, 285–291 (2022).
Dong, J., Zhang, L., Dai, X. & Ding, F. The epitaxy of 2D materials growth. Nat. Commun. 11, 5862 (2020).
Hao, Y. F. et al. Oxygen-activated growth and bandgap tunability of large single-crystal bilayer graphene. Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 426–431 (2016).
Zhou, G. et al. Step-edge-induced oxide growth during the oxidation of Cu surfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 235502 (2012).
Avrami, M. Kinetics of phase change I - General theory. J. Chem. Phys. 7, 1103–1112 (1939).
Kim, M. S. et al. Cu oxidation kinetics through graphene and its effect on the electrical properties of graphene. RSC Adv. 10, 35671–35680 (2020).
Zhou, G. W. & Yang, J. C. Temperature effects on the growth of oxide islands on Cu(110). Appl. Surf. Sci. 222, 357–364 (2004).
Zhang, Z. B. et al. Identification of copper surface index by optical contrast. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 5, 1800377 (2018).
Colbourn, E., Hadden, R. A., Vandervell, H. D., Waugh, K. C. & Webb, G. Adsorption of water on polycrystalline copper - relevance to the water gas shift reaction. J. Catal. 130, 514–527 (1991).
Ghosh, S., Hariharan, S. & Tiwari, A. K. Water adsorption and dissociation on copper/nickel bimetallic surface alloys: effect of surface temperature on reactivity. J. Phys. Chem. C 121, 16351–16365 (2017).
Novoselov, K. S. et al. Two-dimensional gas of massless Dirac fermions in graphene. Nature 438, 197–200 (2005).
Kresse, G. & Furthmuller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996).
Kresse, G. & Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758–1775 (1999).
Blochl, P. E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953–17979 (1994).
Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).
Popescu, V. & Zunger, A. Extracting E versus k effective band structure from supercell calculations on alloys and impurities. Phys. Rev. B 85 (2012).
Dirnberger, D., Kresse, G., Franchini, C. & Reticcioli, M. Electronic state unfolding for plane waves: energy bands, Fermi surfaces, and spectral functions. J. Phys. Chem. C 125, 12921–12928 (2021).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by Guangdong Major Project of Basic and Applied Basic Research (2021B0301030002 (K.L.)), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52025023 (K.L.), 51991342 (K.L.), 52021006 (K.L.), 92163206 (M.W.), 52172035 (M.W.) and T2188101 (K.L.)), the Key R&D Program of Guangdong Province (2020B010189001 (K.L.)), the Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB33000000 (K.L.)), the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (22ZR1441800 (W.S.)), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2023M730103 (Z.B.Z.)), New Cornerstone Science Foundation through the XPLORER PRIZE (K.L.), and Double First-Class Initiative Fund of ShanghaiTech University (Z.W. and W.S.). The calculations were performed at the HPC Platform of ShanghaiTech University Library and Information Services. We acknowledge Cui Yi and Wei Wei from Suzhou Institute of Nano-Tech and Nano-Bionics for their help in the ToF-SIMS experiment.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
K.L., Z.W., and Z.B.Z. supervised the project and conceived the experiments. M.Z. synthesized the samples and conducted the oxidation experiments. W.S. performed the theoretical analysis. M.Z., Z.B.Z., M.D., Y.F., C.L., M.W., and X.L. performed the EBSD, Raman, and AFM characterizations. Y.L. and Z.K.L. performed the ARPES characterizations. C.X., Y.H., Z.Q.Z., and Z.L. performed the in situ SEM, TEM, EDS, and XPS characterizations. All authors discussed the results and contributed to writing the paper.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks Marek Lieder and Yufeng Hao for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhao, M., Zhang, Z., Shi, W. et al. Enhanced copper anticorrosion from Janus-doped bilayer graphene. Nat Commun 14, 7447 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-43357-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-43357-1
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.