Phage-microbe dynamics after sterile faecal filtrate transplantation in individuals with metabolic syndrome: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial assessing efficacy and safety

Wortelboer, Koen; de Jonge, Patrick A.; Scheithauer, Torsten P. M.; Attaye, Ilias; Kemper, E. Marleen; Nieuwdorp, Max; Herrema, Hilde

doi:10.1038/s41467-023-41329-z

Download PDF

Article
Open access
Published: 12 September 2023

Phage-microbe dynamics after sterile faecal filtrate transplantation in individuals with metabolic syndrome: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial assessing efficacy and safety

Nature Communications volume 14, Article number: 5600 (2023) Cite this article

3186 Accesses
2 Citations
19 Altmetric
Metrics details

Subjects

Abstract

Bacteriophages (phages) are bacterial viruses that have been shown to shape microbial communities. Previous studies have shown that faecal virome transplantation can decrease weight gain and normalize blood glucose tolerance in diet-induced obese mice. Therefore, we performed a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled pilot study in which 24 individuals with metabolic syndrome were randomised to a faecal filtrate transplantation (FFT) from a lean healthy donor (n = 12) or placebo (n = 12). The primary outcome, change in glucose metabolism, and secondary outcomes, safety and longitudinal changes within the intestinal bacteriome and phageome, were assessed from baseline up to 28 days. All 24 included subjects completed the study and are included in the analyses. While the overall changes in glucose metabolism are not significantly different between both groups, the FFT is well-tolerated and without any serious adverse events. The phage virion composition is significantly altered two days after FFT as compared to placebo, which coincides with more virulent phage-microbe interactions. In conclusion, we provide evidence that gut phages can be safely administered to transiently alter the gut microbiota of recipients.

Fecal microbiota transplantation in HIV: A pilot placebo-controlled study

Article Open access 18 February 2021

Recipient factors in faecal microbiota transplantation: one stool does not fit all

Article 27 April 2021

Bacteria and bacteriophage consortia are associated with protective intestinal metabolites in patients receiving stem cell transplantation

Article 03 January 2024

Introduction

The metabolic syndrome (MetSyn) constitutes a major global health concern¹. This combination of clinical manifestations that are associated with insulin resistance affects nearly a quarter of the world population and increases the risk for cardiometabolic disease, such as type 2 diabetes (T2D) and cardiovascular disease^2,3. The intestinal microbiota are increasingly seen as contributors to these diseases, e.g., through production of certain microbial metabolites and induction of low-grade inflammation^4,5.

Previously reported microbial effects on human health have been mainly attributed to the bacterial component of the microbiota⁶. However, the gut microbiome is an ecosystem, which, in addition to bacteria, contains viruses, archaea, fungi and protists⁷. The viral component predominantly comprises bacteriophages (98%)⁸, which are present in similar numbers as bacteria in the gut⁹. Bacteriophages (phages from hereon) are bacterial viruses that exclusively infect bacteria and, by doing so, often either kill bacteria (lysis) or incorporate themselves into the bacterial genome (lysogeny)¹⁰. Consequently, phages shape microbial communities in many ecosystems^11,12. Moreover, phages have been implicated in human (gastrointestinal) disease^13,14,15,16, including diabetes^17,18. We recently described decreased richness and diversity of the gut phageome in MetSyn, together with a larger inter-individual variation and altered composition¹⁹.

Considering their ability to modulate gut bacteria and their function²⁰, phages are of special interest in ongoing endeavours to alter the human gut microbiome to benefit human health. Furthermore, the emergence of multidrug-resistant bacteria has led to an increasing interest in phage therapy, in which host-specific phages target specific pathogenic bacteria without affecting the commensal microbiota^21,22. Such phage cocktails can be very effective in treating monoclonal bacterial infections, but are in general not sufficient to (beneficially) alter a complete microbiome^23,24. Therefore, there is growing interest in the transfer of virus-like particles (VLP) isolated from the faecal microbiota, generally called a faecal virome transplantation (FVT). In mice, it has been shown that FVT induced a comparable effect as a faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), in which the complete faecal microbiota of a healthy donor is transferred^25,26. Moreover, in a small human pilot study, an FMT depleted of bacteria, also known as a sterile faecal filtrate transplantation (FFT), was successful in curing five individuals from a recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection²⁷. Compared to FMTs, an FFT or FVT depleted of living microorganisms has a lower risk of transferring unknown pathogenic bacteria, which might improve safety.

Modulation of gut microbiota composition through FMT has been shown to improve peripheral insulin sensitivity in individuals with MetSyn^28,29. Moreover, an FVT from lean donor mice was able to decrease weight gain and normalise blood glucose tolerance in diet-induced obese mice³⁰. This effect was likely mediated through alterations in the gut microbiota induced by phages, as prior treatment with antibiotics disrupted the bacterial hosts and thereby counteracted the effect of the FVT. This raised the question whether the transfer of faecal phages could induce a similar effect as FMT in human individuals with MetSyn.

To study the effect of faecal phages on glucose metabolism, comparing a clean and concentrated faecal virome transplant with a phage-inactivated transplant would be most desirable. Unfortunately, the IRB only allowed us to minimally process the faecal suspension that is usually used for FMT, so we chose an FFT approach. We were hence not able to remove components other than bacteria from the filtrate. However, since phages are self-propagating entities with presumed longer effects on the microbial ecosystem than a single administration of metabolites, peptides or debris, we considered it justified to use the FFT to study phage-bacteria interactions and subsequent effects on glucose metabolism.

In this double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled pilot study, we provide proof of concept that a faecal filtrate from lean healthy donors containing gut virions can be safely administered to MetSyn recipients. Moreover, gut phages have the potential to improve glycemic variability and alter phage-microbe dynamics. Although follow-up studies with cleaner, better defined and better-matched donor-recipient pairs are needed, this study provides a critical basis to do so and move the field forward.

Results

Inclusion of subjects and donors

To study whether an FFT could induce a similar effect on glucose metabolism as an FMT, we set up a prospective double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled pilot study (Fig. 1a). Changes in glucose metabolism between day 0 and 28 were determined by the total area under the curve (AUC) for glucose excursion during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), the primary outcome. Based on previous data from our group^28,29 and our hypothesis that a faecal phage transplant can be equally effective as an FMT^25,26,27,30, a sample size of 12 patients per group was deemed necessary.

**Fig. 1: Study overview and outcomes on glucose metabolism.**

Starting from October 2019, a total of 82 subjects signed the informed consent form and were screened, of whom 24 subjects were included and finished the study before December 2020 (Supplementary Fig. 1A). Most subjects were excluded because they did not have MetSyn according to the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) criteria for the metabolic syndrome³¹. For the faeces donors, 24 subjects signed informed consent and were stepwise screened, resulting in 6 eligible donors (Supplementary Fig. 1B). Potential donors failed screening mainly due to carriage of parasites (11/24, 46%), followed by positive stool tests for pathogens (4/24, 17%) and exclusion based on questionnaire (3/24, 13%). Of these 6 eligible donors, only 3 (3/24, 13%) donated faeces for the production of a sterile faecal filtrate. Therefore, an additional 2 donors who were already actively donating for other FMT studies were included³².

The 24 included MetSyn subjects were randomly assigned to receive an FFT (n = 12) or placebo (n = 12). As shown in Table 1, both groups were similar in baseline characteristics, such as age, sex, body mass index (BMI) and other MetSyn-associated parameters. Only the systolic blood pressure was significantly higher in the placebo group, although this difference disappeared at baseline and follow-up visits and was therefore probably a case of white coat hypertension during the screening. None of the individuals with MetSyn used concomitant medication and their diets were similar (Supplementary Table 1). Compared to the healthy donors, the MetSyn subjects differed, as expected, in almost every aspect of MetSyn-associated parameters (Table 1). All participant completed the follow-up visit at day 28.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of MetSyn subjects and lean donors

Full size table

FFT is safe and well-tolerated

The FFT was well-tolerated by the participants and there were no serious adverse events. Compared to the placebo group, more subjects in the FFT group reported adverse events (AEs) that were likely or possibly related to the intervention (six vs two subjects, p = 0.19, Fisher’s exact test), reporting in total more AEs (eight vs two AEs, p = 0.11, Fisher’s exact test). The adverse events after FFT were in general mild gastrointestinal complaints, such as diarrhoea, constipation, bloating and nausea, which started in the days after the intervention (median 1 day, range 0–36) and disappeared after several days (median 3 days, range 0–27). Besides the transferred faecal phages, these adverse events could theoretically be induced through the transfer of eukaryotic or human viruses. However, as only 0.044 ± 0.3% (median: 0%) of reads mapped to such viruses, we could not ascertain whether these had an effect. To minimise negative effects from eukaryotic viruses, healthy stool donors were thoroughly screened for presence of known pathogenic viruses prior to donation.

Looking at the clinical safety parameters for liver and renal function, haematology and inflammation, we did not observe any differences between the FFT and placebo groups (Table 2). Interestingly, in both groups there was a significant increase in urea levels, which could be explained by the laxative that was used the evening prior to day 0, leading to less degradation of amino acids through the liver at baseline, and therefore less urea.

Table 2 Differences in clinical safety markers after intervention

Full size table

FFT improved glucose variability

Prior to the intervention and after 28 days at follow-up, subjects underwent an OGTT to assess their glucose metabolism (Fig. 1a), which was the primary outcome of the study. Glucose and C-peptide excursions during the OGTT at day 28 after the intervention were similar in the FFT and placebo group (Fig. 1b–d), as were within group alterations (day 0 vs day 28). In addition, we observed similar fasting glucose and insulin levels, insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) (Fig. 1e), and HbA1c values between the FFT and placebo group at day 28 (Table 3). Interestingly, we did observe a significant increase in fasted insulin levels and associated HOMA-IR values between day 0 and 28 within both the FFT and placebo group. However, when comparing these two measures between the screening visit and day 28, they were similar. We can only speculate that this drop in insulin levels and associated HOMA-IR value at the baseline visit resulted from the laxative use the day prior to the intervention. Other baseline characteristics remained stable after intervention and were similar between the FFT and placebo group, such as BMI, blood pressure and cholesterol (Table 3).

Table 3 Changes in physical and metabolic variables after intervention

Full size table

In addition to the OGGT, subjects wore a continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) device (Freestyle Libre) from one week prior till one week after intervention. Looking at the results from the CGM measurements, the FFT and placebo group showed overall similar glucose levels and glucose variability markers after intervention (Supplementary Table 2). However, within the FFT group we identified a nominal significant improvement from 95.5% to 97.5% in the time between 3.9 and 10 mmol/L glucose after intervention (p = 0.02, Wilcoxon signed rank test, Fig. 1f). This indicated an improvement in glucose variability within the FFT group in the week after intervention.

Bacterial and viral diversity remain stable after FFT

To assess the effect of the FFT on the bacteriome and phageome, we collected multiple faecal samples from baseline up to day 28, and performed whole genome shotgun (WGS) sequencing (Fig. 2a)³³. The phage populations derived from this WGS fraction mainly consist of integrated prophages. To study phage virions, VLPs were isolated from the same faecal samples, lysed and the purified DNA was shotgun sequenced as previously described¹⁹. After combining all viral sequences from WGS and VLP fractions, we clustered them at 95% similarity into viral populations (VPs), a level comparable to species in bacteria³⁴.

**Fig. 2: Overview of faecal samples sequenced, richness and diversity.**

Analysis of beta diversity showed that both the VLP and WGS phageomes were indistinguishable between donor and MetSyn participants at baseline (VLP: p = 0.725, PERMANOVA, Supplementary Fig. 2A; WGS: p = 0.672, PERMANOVA, Supplementary Fig. 2B). While this defies our earlier findings¹⁹, this is likely due to the highly individual-specific viromes and the relatively small size of our study. In this study, we directly compared the VLP and WGS phageomes within the same patient longitudinally, whereas previous studies predominantly used different cohorts to compare the VLP and WGS phageomes⁸. Notably, the VLP phageome was radically different from the WGS phageome (p = 0.001, PERMANOVA, Supplementary Fig. 2C).

Next, we looked at the effect of FFT on the bacterial and viral richness (Fig. 2b) and alpha diversity in MetSyn subjects (Fig. 2c). These were comparable throughout the study between the FFT and placebo intervention. Interestingly, in both groups the bacterial richness and α-diversity reduced slightly the first days after the intervention, which was resolved by days 14–28, though these decreases were non-significant (p > 0.05, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). A similar non-significant trend was observed for the richness and diversity of the WGS phageome, which consists mainly of prophages that could have been depleted with their bacterial hosts. In contrast, the richness of the VLP phageome increased slightly by day 2 in both groups, while the α-diversity decreased only in the placebo group, albeit non-significant (p > 0.05, Wilcoxon signed-rank test).

Increase in new phages independent of the intervention

Since we expected transfer of donor phages to the recipients, we looked at the abundance of phages shared between donor and recipient before and after the FFT. Although not significant, after FFT the VPs shared with the donor within the WGS phageome increased up to day 14 (p = 0.2, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Fig. 3a). For the VLP phageome we found an opposite effect, where the VPs shared with the donor decreased non-significantly after the FFT (p = 0.3, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Fig. 3b). The broader effect of the FFT on the phageomes was determined by analysing the abundance of new phages that appeared after the FFT within the WGS phageome (Fig. 3c) and within the VLP phageome (Fig. 3d). In both groups the abundance of new phages increased over time and although not significant, this increase was slightly higher in the FFT group, especially in the VLP phageome on day 2 (p = 0.2, Mann–Whitney U test). These results seem to indicate that the phageomes were perturbed in both the placebo and FFT groups. It further shows that donor-derived phages, especially the VLPs, were either mostly immediately removed from the gut or their engraftment was balanced with the removal of pre-existing VPs shared with the donors.

**Fig. 3: Donor phage and new phage abundance in recipients.**

FFT alters the phage composition of the VLP fraction

Subsequently, we looked at compositional changes within the bacteriome, WGS phageome and VLP phageome (Fig. 4a). Principal response curves showed no overall effect of the FFT on any of these communities compared to placebo, except for a significantly different composition of the VLP phageome on day 2 (p = 0.02, PERMANOVA). This difference in composition within the VLP phageome on day 2 was also evident from a separate principal component analysis (p = 0.028, PERMANOVA, Fig. 4b). As this pointed toward a short-term effect of the FFT, we looked more specifically into VLP communities on day 2 and found 216 VPs that were differentially abundant between the FFT and placebo groups (Fig. 4c and Supplementary Data 1).

**Fig. 4: Compositional differences between the FFT and placebo group.**

To get a better understanding of these phages, we looked at the bacterial host species that these differentially abundant VPs can infect. We observed 6 bacterial host species and 5 bacterial host genera of which the phages were significantly enriched among these VPs (Fig. 4d). The phages infecting some of these host bacteria, like Roseburia intestinalis and Bacteroides species, were differentially abundant in both FFT and placebo treatment groups. But others, like Sutterella wadsworthensis and Scatocola faecigallinarum, were notably exclusively differentially abundant in one of the two treatment groups. The only host species enriched among differentially abundant VPs and more prevalent in the placebo group was S. wadsworthensis, a betaproteobacterium associated with gastrointestinal infections. Those more prevalent among the FFT group were taxonomically diverse, belonging to the Bacteroidetes (Bacteroides spp.), Firmicutes (R. intestinalis, Faecousia and CAG-882) and Proteobacteria (S. faecigallinarum and CAG-267).

FFT induces an antagonistic phage-microbe interaction

Intrigued by the presence of differentially abundant VPs two days after FFT, we determined whether the dynamics between phages and their microbial hosts had changed. For this, we linked VPs to metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) from our WGS sequencing dataset and calculated the mean abundance change for all VP-MAG pairs belonging to a given species in a given sample. This showed opposing relationships between MAG and VP abundance in the first two days of the intervention (Fig. 5a): this was negatively correlated for the FFT group (R = −0.13, p = 0.005) and positively correlated in the placebo group (R = 0.17, p = 0.000). These results could indicate a difference in the ecological dynamics between the two sample groups, where the FFT group was dominated by lytic phage-bacterium interactions, while they were more likely to be lysogenic or chronic in the placebo group. These findings were unaltered when employing clr-transformed data. These effects intriguingly were less pronounced when comparing days 2 and 28 (FFT: R = −0.043, p = 0.24; placebo: R = 0.12, p = 0.004; Fig. 5b), and completely absent when comparing days 0 and 28 (Fig. 5c). Thus, the overall effect of the FTT on phage-host interactions seemed pronounced but short-lived.

**Fig. 5: Correlations between viral populations and their host bacteria.**

Discussion

In this randomised controlled clinical trial we administered a sterile faecal filtrate from healthy donors to human individuals with MetSyn. The FFT was well-tolerated and safe, with recipients experiencing solely mild gastrointestinal adverse effects. As the study group is small, larger studies with a longer follow-up are warranted to fully assess the safety profile of the FFT. However, compared to FMTs, an FFT depleted of living microorganisms has a lower risk of transferring unknown pathogenic bacteria²⁷. Since FMT has a good safety profile^35,36, this most likely holds true for FFTs as well. Compared to FMTs, it is relatively easier to further optimise and standardise FFTs, e.g., through lyophilization and encapsulation of faecal filtrate, as the viability of the many strict anaerobic bacteria does not have to be preserved. Such developments of FFT will ease the administration, reduce the invasiveness and provide an option for prolonged or maintenance therapy, even in a home-setting.

While we did find a slight improvement of the glucose variability in the FFT group, expressed as the time between 3.9 and 10 mmol/L glucose, the FFT and placebo groups showed similar glucose excursions during the OGGT performed at day 28. Previously, an FVT in diet-induced obese mice reduced weight gain and improved blood glucose tolerance³⁰. However, FVTs differ slightly from FFTs, with phages being more concentrated and washed to reduce bacterial debris, metabolites and antimicrobial peptides. Moreover, in this previous study, several donor phageomes were combined, resulting in a highly diverse phageome. In addition, compared to humans, microbiomes of mice are more similar due to the same housing and diet³⁷, thereby increasing the chance of highly specific bacteriophages encountering their host and, subsequently, modulating the microbiota. In humans, improvement of insulin sensitivity after lean healthy donor FMT in individuals with MetSyn has been reported^28,29. These studies had a comparable study design as present study, with the major difference being the absence of the faecal bacteria in the intervention. Although this is not a direct comparison, we speculate that, in the case of MetSyn, the beneficial bacteria transplanted during an FMT significantly contribute to the improved glucose metabolism observed.

Nevertheless, the FFT was able to alter the phage virions or VLP phageome composition on day 2 compared to the placebo, showing 216 differentially abundant VPs. By day 28 this significant difference disappeared, which indicates the FFT effect was short-lived. Looking at the bacterial hosts of these differentially abundant phages, we found six host species that were significantly enriched, of which five were more prevalent in the FFT group. One of these bacterial hosts is the butyrate producer Roseburia intestinalis, which has been found to be depleted in MetSyn^38,39 and contributes to inflammatory signalling inhibition and intestinal barrier repair^40,41. While the other bacterial species have not been directly linked to MetSyn previously, some of their relatives within the Oscillospiraceae (Faecousia sp000434635) and Lachnospiraceae (CAG − 882 sp003486385) have been implicated in obesity and MetSyn^42,43,44,45. In line, the genus Bacteroides has been associated with obesity and MetSyn, both positively and negatively^46,47.

In addition, we speculate that the FFT induced virulent interactions between phages and their microbe hosts in the first two days after administration, while the phage-microbe interactions appeared more lysogenic/temperate in the placebo group. These virulent interactions in the FFT group could be the result of donor phages infecting and lysing the bacteria from the recipient. On the other hand, the introduction of novel donor phages could have induced the replication of existing prophages⁴⁸, thereby leading to more virulent interactions. As the number of previously unobserved VLP VPs increased on day 2, while donor-shared VLP VPs did not, we hypothesise the latter is more likely. It could be that some non-phage element of the FFT, such as fructose⁴⁹ or a phage-derived peptide⁵⁰, prompted integrated phages to excise from their bacterial hosts. Otherwise, it could also be that increased infection of bacteria by donor-derived phages caused lower bacterial abundance, resulting in higher phage lysis rates, in line with the piggyback the winner model of phage-host interactions⁵¹. Following this hypothesis further, growth of (some) bacterial species after the laxative treatment could have caused increased lysogeny among the phageomes in the placebo group.

Interestingly, changes in bacterial and viral diversity over time were similar between both groups. While we did observe a small, non-significant increase in the abundance of VPs shared with the donor in the WGS phageome, this abundance decreased non-significantly within the VLP phageome. This can in part be explained by the large increase in new phages within the VLP phageome (50-60%), which was bigger compared to the increase within the WGS phageome (~15%). This difference may have been caused by either the absence of low-abundance VPs in the WGS sequencing data due to their relatively smaller sizes, or a difference in community dynamics between VLP and WGS phageomes. The increase in new phages indicates that the phageome was perturbed, leading to an accelerated genomic recombination that stimulated phage evolution. However, since this happened in both groups, we hypothesise that this is, in part, an effect of the laxative pre-treatment. This laxative treatment could have removed pre-existing donor-shared VPs, and, by washing away part of the host bacteria, could have reduced the probability of donor phages infecting their host.

This study has several limitations. Although we did not find an overall effect on glucose metabolism, it is not possible to assess whether the FFT intervention was insufficient to alter the glucose metabolism or whether the effect is obfuscated by the small sample size and large heterogeneity within the MetSyn study population. Our sample-size for the current study was based on the assumption that the FFT would be as effective as an FMT in improving glucose metabolism^28,29, which is probably not the case. Unfortunately, based on current results where we observe a small non-significant increase in glucose AUC in both groups, it is not possible to repeat the power calculation. The increased glucose AUC could be seen as natural progression of MetSyn, but we speculate that this was caused by the laxative pre-treatment, which also reduced the fasting insulin levels and associated HOMA-IR values at baseline. The laxative pre-treatment could also have reduced the FFT efficacy, by reducing the number of potential hosts for the transplanted phages. Therefore, for future studies with FFT, we would highly recommend to omit this step. In addition, pooling of donor phages and matching donors and recipients, thereby increasing the diversity and likelihood of a phage-host match, could further improve the efficacy of the FFT.

Due the ethical reasons, we had to keep the production of the bacteriophage transplant simple and straightforward, which is why we performed an FFT instead of an FVT in this human intervention study. Therefore, we cannot completely rule out any effect of other compounds present in the filtrate besides the phages, such as bacterial debris, metabolites and antimicrobial peptides. In line, we performed tangential flow filtration with sterile, single-use cassettes with a 0.2 µm membrane to reduce the potential risk of cross-contamination between donors. However, not all phages may pass through these pores and a pore size of 0.45 µm will result in higher phage titres, as has been described previously⁵². Our analysis focused on bacteriophages, while we likely also transferred eukaryotic viruses. However, as only 0.044 ± 0.3% (median: 0%) of reads mapped to such viruses, we could not ascertain whether these had an effect. In addition, our sequencing method focused on dsDNA phages, thus missing ssDNA phages, which can be as abundant as dsDNA phages in the human gut^7,8. Therefore, we suggest future studies include ssDNA viruses, as well as dsRNA and ssRNA viruses for a more comprehensive analysis of the gut phage community. The small sample size and large heterogeneity did not allow for any post hoc sex-based analyses. Finally, since we only included Dutch European subjects, the generalisability of our results to other populations is limited.

Besides above-mentioned suggestions for future FFT studies, future research should focus on targeting specific bacteria with phages to get a better mechanistic understanding of how bacterial communities are changed upon phage predation and how these changes could affect disease phenotypes. One example of specific phages targeting pathogenic bacteria is the phage cocktail developed to treat recurrent Clostridioides difficile infections⁵³. Another interesting target are the Lactobacillaceae that are thought to produce ethanol and thereby contribute to non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)⁵⁴. It should be noted that such precision therapy might be very efficient at clearing a specific pathogen, but will unlikely restore any underlying microbial dysbiosis. Therefore, a combination of endogenous phages to modulate a complete microbiome should be further studied, e.g., by matching donors and recipients based on their phageome and bacteriome composition, respectively.

In conclusion, we performed a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial in which we safely administered a faecal filtrate to human individuals with MetSyn. We provide evidence that gut phages from a healthy donor can transiently alter the gut microbiota of recipients. This study provides a critical basis for follow-up studies, which should better match donors and recipients based on their bacteriome and phageome composition.

Methods

Study design

We set up a prospective, double-blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled intervention study that was performed in our academic hospital, the Amsterdam University Medical Centres location AMC in the Netherlands. After passing screening, 24 subjects with MetSyn were randomised to receive a sterile FFT from a lean healthy donor or a placebo transplant. Prior to the intervention and after 28 days at follow-up, subjects underwent an OGTT to assess their glucose metabolism. In addition, a week prior to one week after intervention, subjects monitored their blood glucose using a flash glucose monitoring device (Freestyle Libre). Faecal samples were collected at multiple timepoints between baseline and follow-up to study dynamic changes in the microbiome. Finally, during every study visit a medical exam was conducted in addition to blood plasma collection to assess the safety of the intervention. Figure 1a provides a schematic overview of the study.

Study subjects

Study participants were all European Dutch, overweight (body mass index (BMI) ≥ 25 kg/m²) subjects between 18 and 65 years of age and had to meet the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) criteria for the metabolic syndrome³¹. Both male and female participants were included in the study and sex was self-reported. Main exclusion criteria were the use of any medication, illicit drug use, smoking, or alcohol abuse in the past 3 months, as well as a history of cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, or immunological disease. Supplementary Table 3 summarises all in- and exclusion criteria and Supplementary Fig. 1 provides and overview of the recruitment of study participants.

Donor screening

Faeces donors were lean healthy European Dutch subjects who were thoroughly screened according to the guidelines of the European FMT Working Group⁵⁵. Screening of potential donors was performed in a stepwise manner as previously published³². Briefly, potential donors first completed an extensive screening questionnaire. If they passed this stage, their faeces were screened for pathogenic parasites. When negative, several faecal samples were screened for presence of pathogenic bacteria, viruses and multidrug resistant organisms (MDROs), as well as the level of calprotectin. Donors screened after May 2020 were additionally screened for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)⁵⁶. In addition, blood was collected for serological testing and to screen for an abnormal liver or renal function or an impaired immunity. When donors passed this screening, they were allowed to donate faeces for a period of 6 months. Supplementary Table 4 lists the specific in- and exclusion criteria for faeces donors. Every two months, active donors underwent a short rescreening, which included, among others, screening for MDROs and SARS-CoV-2. In addition, before every donation, donors had to complete a shortened questionnaire to confirm their eligibility. We matched donors and recipients based on their sex and whether they have had a prior infection with cytomegalovirus or Epstein–Barr virus.

Sterile faecal filtrate production and administration

Production of the sterile faecal filtrate started the day before administration to the MetSyn subjects. First, 50 g of stool was collected from a screened donor, which was homogenised with 500 ml sterile saline. Large particles were filtered from the faecal suspension using double sterile gauzes. Most of the bacteria were removed in two subsequent centrifugation steps, in which the suspension was spun for 1 h at 10.000×g. Finally, the supernatant was filtered through a sterile 0.2 μm membrane using a tangential flow filtration device (Vivaflow 50). Production of the filtrate from donor stool was performed within 6 h and took, on average, 334 min (SD = 27). The filtrate was stored overnight in a fridge until administration. The production is depicted in Supplementary Fig. 3A.

The sterile faecal filtrate was administered to the patient via a nasoduodenal tube. The day prior to the administration, subjects were asked to clean their bowel using a laxative (Klean-Prep®, Norgine B.V.), which is a standard pre-treatment for FMT procedures in our hospital. Nasoduodenal tubes were placed with the help of a Cortrak®2 enteral access system (Avanos Medical Inc.), making sure the nasoduodenal tube was correctly positioned. The faecal filtrate was slowly infused with a 60 ml syringe, on average 300 ml during a 15-20 min period. Supplementary Fig. 3B provides a schematic overview of the FFT procedure.

During the optimisation of the tangential flow filtration, we quantified the VLP numbers of the faecal filtrates from four different donors, as previously described^57,58. Briefly, faecal filtrates were concentrated, from which VLPs were isolated with caesium chloride density gradient centrifugation, stained with SYBR Gold and counted by epifluorescence microscopy. Faecal filtrates contained on average 1.25E + 08 VLPs/ml (SD 0.45E + 08), which is in line with previous publications^59,60. We confirmed the absence of bacteria from the faecal filtrate with a qPCR for the bacterial 16 S rRNA gene as previously described⁶¹, showing a 10⁵-fold decrease in bacterial DNA (Supplementary Fig. 3C). We further confirmed this by culturing of the faecal filtrate using Biosart® 100 monitors (Sartorius). 100 ml of faecal filtrate was filtered and the cellulose nitrate membranes were incubated on petri dishes with Columbia agar + 5% sheep blood (bioMérieux) for two days at 37 °C under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions. We did not observe any colony-forming units in 100 ml of faecal filtrate.

Outcomes

The primary outcome was change in glucose metabolism, as determined by the AUC for glucose excursion during the OGTT. Secondary outcomes related to glucose metabolism were changes in fasting glucose, insulin, HOMA-IR and HbA1c between baseline and follow-up after 28 days, as well as changes in glucose variability measured by CGM a week before and after intervention. Other secondary outcomes were the dynamic changes in gut bacteriome and virome populations following FFT or placebo intervention and the comparison of phage composition between lean donors and subjects with MetSyn. Finally, we assessed the safety of the FFT as determined by the occurrence of (serious) adverse events, physical exam and several blood parameters for renal and liver function and inflammation.

Sample size calculation

Based on previous data from our group in which individuals with MetSyn received an FMT^28,29, and the hypothesis that a faecal phage transplant can be equally effective as a traditional FMT^25,26,27,30, we assumed a 15% improvement in glucose tolerance upon FFT. With a two-sided 5% significance level and a power of 80%, a sample size of 12 patients per group was necessary, given an anticipated dropout rate of 10%. To recruit 24 individuals with MetSyn, we anticipated a 12-month inclusion period.

Randomisation

Data were captured with electronic case report forms build in Castor EDC (v2019.2.0-2020.2.25)⁶². In CASTOR, subjects were randomly assigned to an intervention by block randomisation with stratification for age and sex, and block sizes of 4, 6 and 8. The day prior to the intervention, both the faecal filtrate and placebo (sterile saline with brown colour) were prepared and stored overnight. Both the faecal filtrate and placebo looked identical. A randomisation assistant unblinded for the treatment allocation prepared the correct solution for administration and destroyed the other. The investigator administered the allocated treatment in blinded syringes and through an opaque nasoduodenal tube, making sure both participants and the investigator were blinded for the intervention throughout the study.

Oral glucose tolerance test and biochemical measurements

For the OGTT, overnight fasted subjects ingested a standardised glucose solution (75 g). Blood was drawn from an intravenous catheter at baseline and 15, 30, 45, 60, 90 and 120 min after ingestion. Both blood serum and plasma were aliquoted and stored at −80 °C. From these aliquots we measured glucose and C-peptide, which was performed by the Endocrinology department of the Amsterdam UMC. In addition, blood samples collected at baseline and follow-up were used to measure fasted glucose, insulin, HbA1c and the clinical safety parameters for renal/liver function and inflammation, all measured by the Central Diagnostics Laboratory of the Amsterdam UMC. Results were reported in the electronic medical record software from EPIC (versions August 2019-November 2020).

Continuous glucose monitoring

To reduce the study burden and prevent daily finger pricks, we used a continuous glucose monitoring device (Freestyle Libre 1) to monitor blood glucose, which allowed subjects to perform all normal activities while wearing the sensor. Subjects were taught to subcutaneously implant the CGM sensor and were instructed to extract the data from the sensor at least every 8 h. One week prior to the intervention subjects started to monitor their glucose until one week after the intervention. Compliance among participants was good, with a median 100% (range 76–100%) of data correctly collected, during a median period of 14 (range 11–27) days with a median 1350 (range 1043–2617) sensor readings. During that same period, participants were asked to record their diet using an online food diary (Eetmeter v2019-2020) from the Voedingscentrum)⁶³. At the follow-up visit, data from the CGM scanner were exported and analysed with the previously published CGDA package v0.8.2 for CGM data analysis⁶⁴.

Faeces collection

The day before the intervention and 2, 4, 7, 14 and 28 days thereafter, subjects were asked to collect several faecal samples. Faeces were collected by participant in stool collection tubes, which were directly stored in a freezer at home inside a safety bag. In addition, participants registered the time, date and consistency of the collected faeces according to the Bristol Stool Chart. At the baseline and follow-up visits, these faecal samples were transported to the hospital frozen, where they were directly stored at −80 °C until the end of the study.

Bacteriome and virome sequencing

To study the bacteriome and virome, we performed whole genome shotgun (WGS) sequencing. From the stored frozen faeces samples, total genomic DNA was extracted using a repeated bead beating method as described previously³³. Briefly, 250 mg of faeces were weighed in bead-beat tubes, 700 µl of S.T.A.R. buffer (Roche Diagnostics Cat# 03335208001) was added, and samples were homogenised three times using a bead-beater (FastPrep-24™, MP Biomedicals™) set to 5.5 ms for 1 min. Lysates were incubated at 95 °C for 15 min centrifuged for 5 min at full speed (14,000×g) at 4 °C, and supernatant was transferred to nuclease-free tubes. The above was repeated once with 300 µl of S.T.A.R. buffer to extract any remaining DNA. DNA was further cleaned from the lysates using the Maxwell® RSC Blood DNA Kit (Promega Cat#ASB1520) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Extracted DNA was stored at −20 °C and shipped on dry ice to Novogene (Cambridge, United Kingdom). Libraries for shotgun metagenomic sequencing were prepared using the NEBNext Ultra II Library prep kit (New England Biolabs Cat#E7645L) and sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq instrument with 150 bp paired-end reads and 6 Gb data/sample. Supplementary Figure 3D summarises the sequencing and bioinformatics pipeline used. For both the WGS and VLP sequencing (see below) negative controls were included to check for contamination during DNA extraction and library prep. These negative controls did not yield any measurable DNA after library prep and were therefore not sequenced. No mock communities were included as positive controls in the current sequencing pipeline.

VLP sequencing

To study phage virions, we isolated the faecal VLP fraction and sequenced dsDNA phages as previously described¹⁹. Briefly, the VLPs were extracted from 500 mg of faeces using high-speed centrifugation followed by filtration through a 0.45 µm membrane. Any free-DNA debris was digested prior to lysing the VLPs, whereafter the DNA was purified using a two-step phenol/chloroform extraction protocol. Finally, the DNA was purified using the DNeasy Blood&Tissue kit (Qiagen Cat#69506) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Library preparation was done with the NEBNext Ultra II FS DNA library prep kit (New England Biolabs Cat#E7805L) and the NEBNext Multiplex Oligos for Illumina dual indexes (New England Biolabs Cat#E7600S) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Quality and concentration of the VLP libraries were assessed with the Qubit dsDNA HS kit (ThermoFisher Cat#Q32854) and with the Agilent High Sensitivity D5000 ScreenTape system (Agilent Technologies). Libraries were sequenced using 2×150 bp paired-end chemistry on an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform with the S4 Reagent Kit v1.5, 300 cycles (Illumina Cat#20028312) at the Core Facility Genomics of the Amsterdam UMC.

Sequence assembly

Sequencing resulted in an average of 21.7 ± 3.5 M reads per WGS sample (median: 22.4 M reads), and 23.6 ± 18.3 M per VLP sample (median: 18.1 M reads). Before assembly, reads belonging to the same participant were concatenated. Adapter sequence removal and read trimming were performed with fastp v0.23.2 (option –detect_adapter_for_pe)⁶⁵. As previously recommended⁶⁶, reads were then error corrected with tadpole (options mode=correct, ecc=t, prefilter=2), and deduplicated with clumpify (options dedupe=t, optical=t, dupedist=12000), both from bbmap v38.90 [https://jgi.doe.gov/data-and-tools/bbtools]. High-quality reads from WGS samples were then cross-assembled per participant using metaSPAdes v3.15.5⁶⁷ (option–only-assembler). Due to their great complexity, we were unable to assemble some of the VLP samples. We thus assembled these with MEGAHIT v1.2.9⁶⁸, which we did for all VLP samples to keep methodological consistency.

Viral sequence recognition and clustering

To identify viral sequences among the WGS and VLP assemblies, contigs longer than 5000 bp were analysed with virsorter v2.2.3⁶⁹ (option –exclude-lt2gene) and checkv v1.0.1⁷⁰. Contigs were taken to be of viral origin if at least one of the following criteria was true: checkv identified at least one viral gene, VirSorter2 gave a score of at least 0.95, VirSorter2 identified at least 2 viral hallmark genes, checkv identified no viral or bacterial genes. In total, we selected 53,204 contigs with at least 1 viral gene, 782 with a virsorter2 score of > 0.95, and 1 with at least 2 viral hallmark genes. The resulting viral sequences were then deduplicated at 100% with bbdupe from bbmap v38.90 (option minidentity=100). This resulted in a non-redundant database of 50,724 viral contigs, which were subsequently clustered at 90% average nucleotide identity (ANI) into viral populations (VPs) using blastn all-vs-all searches with BLAST v2.12.0+⁷¹. The longest contigs in each VP were further clustered into viral clusters (VCs) by vContact2 v0.11.3⁷². Since the conclusions of the analyses were identical regardless of whether they were performed with VPs or VCs, only VP-level analyses were reported.

Viral read depth determination

Viral relative abundance was determined by mapping high-quality reads from each sample (i.e., one mapping per participant and time-point) against non-redundant viral sequences with bowtie2 v2.4.2⁷³. Following earlier recommendations⁷⁴, contigs were considered to be present if at least 75% of their bases were covered by at least 1 read mapped with over 90% ANI. To determine this, reads mapping with less than 90% ANI were removed from alignments with coverm filter v0.6.1 (option –min-read-percent-identity 90 [https://github.com/wwood/CoverM]), and coverage was determined with bedtools genomecov v2.27.1⁷⁵ (option -max 1). Read counts per contigs were then determined with samtools idxstats v1.15.1⁷⁶, and those with a horizontal coverage of <75% were set to zero. Read counts and contig lengths were summed per VP, and reads per kilobase per million mapped reads (RPKM) values were calculated to take differential contig lengths.

Bacterial community profiling and binning

Bacterial population compositions of WGS samples were profiled per participant and time point with mOTUs v3.0.3⁷⁷. Binning contigs into metagenome assembled genomes (MAGs) was done per participant. First, high quality reads from each time-point were mapped to cross-assembled contigs of at least 2500 bp with bowtie2 v2.4.2. Read depth tables were then constructed with jgi_summarize_bam_contig_depths v2.15, and contigs were binned with metabat2 v2:2.15⁷⁸. Completion and contamination of putative MAGs were then determined using checkm v1.2.1⁷⁹ and, like was previously done⁸⁰, MAGs were considered for further analysis if completeness - (5 x contamination) was at least 50. Taxonomy of such MAGs was determined with GTDB-Tk v2.1.1⁸¹ using the R207-v2 database package. This resulted in a database of 3011 MAGs with an assigned taxonomy.

Determining phage-host links

Viral sequences were linked to bacterial MAGs in two ways. Firstly, if a viral contig was contained within a MAG, it was considered to be a prophage. Secondly, viral contigs were linked to MAGs using CRISPR spacer hits. For this, CRISPR spacer arrays were identified among MAGs using CRISPCasFinder v4.2.20⁸². CRISPR spacers between 20 and 30 bp in length were then matched to viral contigs through a blastn search with BLAST v2.12.0+ (options -task blastn-short). Spacer hits were finally filtered for those with 2 or fewer mismatches, minimising the risk of spurious hits.

Statistical analyses

All statistical analyses were performed in R v4.2.1. Richness, α-diversities, principal component analysis (PCA), and principal response curves (PRC) were all calculated with the vegan R package v2.6-4⁸³. For richness and α-diversity RPKM values were used, while PCAs and PRCs used centred log ratio (clr)-transformed data so as to account for the compositionality of the data⁸⁴. Before clr-transformation, VPs of low abundance and prevalence were removed by removing those with total RPKM of <100 over all samples, as well as those with RPKM values of >20 in less than 10% of samples. Significance levels of PCAs were calculated with a permutational analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) test, as implemented in the vegan R package v2.6-4 and were controlled for age and sex. For the PRC-analysis, the permutest function was used to calculate significance. Both PERMANOVA and permutest used 1000 permutations. p-values were adjusted for multiple testing using the Benjamini–Hochberg approach where necessary. General linear models were constructed with the glmmPQL function from the MASS R package v7.3-58.1 with the age, sex, day, group and day:group as fixed effects and participants as random effect.

Differential abundance

Differential abundance of VPs among VLP samples on day 2 was determined with ANCOM-BC v1.2.2⁸⁵. Input of ANCOM-BC consisted of the raw read counts summed per VP in each sample, because this method has its own internal data normalisations to account estimated sample fractions. ANCOM-BC was run on VPs with at least 20 reads reported in at least 10% of samples. To account for the relatively small sample sizes, structural zero discovery was turned on but the usage of the asymptotic lower bound turned off⁸⁵. Differential abundance was corrected for the effects of age and sex. ANCOM-BC used multiple-testing correction according to the Benjamini-Hochberg method, with a significance cutoff of 0.05. The number of differentially abundant (DA) VPs was then determined per host species. Enrichment of host species among DA VPs was calculated using a hypergeometric test as implemented in the phyper R function, with the number of DA VPs infecting a given species-1 as q, the total number of VPs in the dataset infecting the same species as m, the total number of VPs with host-m as n, the total number of DA VPs as k, and lower.tail set to FALSE.

Phage-host interactions

To determine the dynamics of phage-bacterium interaction across the entire population, the change in relative abundance between days 0 and 2, 2 and 28 and 0 and 28 were determined for all VPs with a host and all MAGs with a known phage. The resulting values were then averaged for both VPs and MAGs at the species level, after which Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated.

Patient and public involvement statement

Patients were involved in the assessment of the grant proposals for this study by the Dutch Diabetes Research Foundation (Diabetes II Breakthrough grant (459001008) and Senior Fellowship (2019.82.004)). Moreover, the patient panel advised on the patient burden of the clinical study. In addition, patients were involved in the ethical approval of this study (as part of the ethics committee). Once the trial results became available, participants were informed of the results with a letter suitable for a non-specialist audience.

Ethics approval and informed consent statement

This study involves human participants and was approved by the Medical Research Ethics Committee Academic Medical Center Amsterdam (METC 2018_231). Both participants and faeces donors gave informed consent to participate in the study before taking part. The study was registered at the Dutch National Trial Register (NTR) under NL8289 on the 15^th of January 2020, while the first patient was included in October 2019. The delay in registration was due to a miscommunication between investigators. When this mistake came to light during the first monitor visit after the first three patients had been included, the study was directly registered at the NTR. This registry does not exist anymore and all data has been added unaltered to the Dutch Trial Register (LTR) under https://clinicaltrialregister.nl/en/trial/26916. While these data are automatically included in the International Clinical Trial Registry Platform (ICTRP), thereby fulfilling the requirement of prospective registration as required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), it was unfortunately no longer possible to adjust the data.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

The sequencing data generated in this study have been deposited in the European Nucleotide Archive database under accession code: PRJEB60691. The data are freely available without restriction. Source data of figures and tables are provided in the Source Data file. The R207-v2 database package of GTDB-Tk is available from: https://data.gtdb.ecogenomic.org/releases/release207/207.0/auxillary_files/gtdbtk_r207_v2_data.tar.gz. Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after deidentification, are freely available in the Source Data file. The study protocol is included with the publication. All of the individual participant data collected during the trial, after deidentification, are available upon request. Methodological sound proposals with clear aims should be directed to h.j.herrema@amsterdamumc.nl. To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data transfer agreement. Data will be available up to five years following article publication. Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

The following programmes were used for data collection: Castor EDC (v2019.2.0-2020.2.25), EPIC (versions August 2019-November 2020), Voedingscentrum Eetmeter (v2019-2020), Freestyle Libre 1 software. The following software and codes were used for data analysis: R v4.2.1, CGDA v0.8.2, fastp v0.23.2, bbmap v38.90, metaSPAdes v3.15.5, MEGAHIT v1.2.9, virsorter v2.2.3, checkv v1.0.1, BLAST v2.12.0+, vContact2 v0.11.3, bowtie2 v2.4.2, coverm filter v0.6.1, bedtools v2.27.1, samtools v1.15.1, mOTUs v3.0.3, jgi_summarize_bam_contig_depths v2.15, metabat2 v2:2.15, checkm v1.2.1, GTDB-Tk v2.1.1, CRISPCasFinder v4.2.20, vegan R package v2.6-4, MASS R package v7.3-58.1 and ANCOM-BC v1.2.2. In the ”Methods” section any specific settings are described. Codes and scripts are publicly available online and from published literature. No custom software was developed for this project.

References

Dabke, K., Hendrick, G. & Devkota, S. The gut microbiome and metabolic syndrome. J. Clin. Invest. 129, 4050–4057 (2019).
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
O’Neill, S. & O’Driscoll, L. Metabolic syndrome: a closer look at the growing epidemic and its associated pathologies. Obes. Rev. 16, 1–12 (2015).
PubMed Google Scholar
Gurka, M. J., Guo, Y., Filipp, S. L. & DeBoer, M. D. Metabolic syndrome severity is significantly associated with future coronary heart disease in Type 2 diabetes. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 17, 17 (2018).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Scheithauer, T. P. M. et al. Gut Microbiota as a trigger for metabolic inflammation in obesity and type 2 diabetes. Front. Immunol. 11, 571731 (2020).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ussar, S. et al. Interactions between gut microbiota, host genetics and diet modulate the predisposition to obesity and metabolic syndrome. Cell Metab. 22, 516–530 (2015).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zuppi, M., Hendrickson, H. L., O’Sullivan, J. M. & Vatanen, T. Phages in the gut ecosystem. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 11, 822562 (2021).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Shkoporov, A. N. & Hill, C. Bacteriophages of the human gut: the ‘known unknown’ of the microbiome. Cell Host Microbe 25, 195–209 (2019).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Gregory, A. C. et al. The gut virome database reveals age-dependent patterns of virome diversity in the human gut. Cell Host Microbe 28, 724–740.e8 (2020).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Marbouty, M., Thierry, A., Millot, G. A. & Koszul, R. MetaHiC phage-bacteria infection network reveals active cycling phages of the healthy human gut. Elife 10, e60608 (2021).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
de Jonge, P. A., Nobrega, F. L., Brouns, S. J. J. & Dutilh, B. E. Molecular and evolutionary determinants of bacteriophage host range. Trends Microbiol 27, 51–63 (2019).
PubMed Google Scholar
Breitbart, M., Bonnain, C., Malki, K. & Sawaya, N. A. Phage puppet masters of the marine microbial realm. Nat. Microbiol. 3, 754–766 (2018).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kuzyakov, Y. & Mason-Jones, K. Viruses in soil: nano-scale undead drivers of microbial life, biogeochemical turnover and ecosystem functions. Soil Biol. Biochem. 127, 305–317 (2018).
CAS Google Scholar
Gogokhia, L. et al. Expansion of bacteriophages is linked to aggravated intestinal inflammation and colitis. Cell Host Microbe 25, 285–299.e8 (2019).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Norman, J. M. et al. Disease-specific alterations in the enteric virome in inflammatory bowel disease. Cell 160, 447–460 (2015).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Adiliaghdam, F. et al. Human enteric viruses autonomously shape inflammatory bowel disease phenotype through divergent innate immunomodulation. Sci. Immunol. 7, eabn6660 (2022).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Nakatsu, G. et al. Alterations in enteric virome are associated with colorectal cancer and survival outcomes. Gastroenterology 155, 529–541.e5 (2018).
PubMed Google Scholar
Chen, Q. et al. Enteric phageome alterations in patients with type 2 diabetes. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 10, 575084 (2020).
PubMed Google Scholar
Manrique, P. et al. Gut bacteriophage dynamics during fecal microbial transplantation in subjects with metabolic syndrome. Gut Microbes 13, 1–15 (2021).
PubMed Google Scholar
de Jonge, P. A. et al. Gut virome profiling identifies a widespread bacteriophage family associated with metabolic syndrome. Nat. Commun. 13, 3594 (2022).
ADS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Hsu, B. B. et al. Dynamic modulation of the gut microbiota and metabolome by bacteriophages in a mouse model. Cell Host Microbe 25, 803–814.e5 (2019).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Manohar, P., Tamhankar, A. J., Lundborg, C. S. & Nachimuthu, R. Therapeutic characterization and efficacy of bacteriophage cocktails infecting Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Enterobacter Species. Front. Microbiol. 10, 574 (2019).
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Roach, D. R. et al. Synergy between the host immune system and bacteriophage is essential for successful phage therapy against an acute respiratory pathogen. Cell Host Microbe 22, 38–47.e4 (2017).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Galtier, M. et al. Bacteriophages to reduce gut carriage of antibiotic resistant uropathogens with low impact on microbiota composition. Environ. Microbiol. 18, 2237–2245 (2016).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Mai, V., Ukhanova, M., Reinhard, M. K., Li, M. & Sulakvelidze, A. Bacteriophage administration significantly reduces Shigella colonization and shedding by Shigella-challenged mice without deleterious side effects and distortions in the gut microbiota. Bacteriophage 5, e1088124 (2015).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lin, D. M. et al. Transplanting fecal virus-like particles reduces high-fat diet-induced small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in mice. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 9, 1–11 (2019).
Google Scholar
Draper, L. A. et al. Autochthonous faecal viral transfer (FVT) impacts the murine microbiome after antibiotic perturbation. BMC Biol. 18, 173 (2020).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ott, S. J. et al. Efficacy of sterile fecal filtrate transfer for treating patients with Clostridium difficile infection. Gastroenterology 152, 799–811 (2017).
PubMed Google Scholar
Vrieze, A. et al. Transfer of intestinal microbiota from lean donors increases insulin sensitivity in individuals with metabolic syndrome. Gastroenterology 143, 913–916.e7 (2012).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kootte, R. S. et al. Improvement of insulin sensitivity after lean donor feces in metabolic syndrome is driven by baseline intestinal microbiota composition. Cell Metab. 26, 611–619.e6 (2017).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Rasmussen, T. S. et al. Faecal virome transplantation decreases symptoms of type 2 diabetes and obesity in a murine model. Gut 69, 2122–2130 (2020).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Grundy, S. M. et al. Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome: an American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Scientific Statement. Circulation 112, 2735–2752 (2005).
PubMed Google Scholar
Bénard, M. V. et al. Challenges and costs of donor screening for fecal microbiota transplantations. PLoS ONE 17, e0276323 (2022).
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Deschasaux, M. et al. Depicting the composition of gut microbiota in a population with varied ethnic origins but shared geography. Nat. Med. 24, 1526–1531 (2018).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Gregory, A. C. et al. Marine DNA viral macro- and microdiversity from pole to pole. Cell 177, 1109–1123.e14 (2019).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Li, Y.-T., Cai, H.-F., Wang, Z.-H., Xu, J. & Fang, J.-Y. Systematic review with meta-analysis: long-term outcomes of faecal microbiota transplantation for Clostridium difficile infection. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 43, 445–457 (2016).
PubMed Google Scholar
Moayyedi, P., Yuan, Y., Baharith, H. & Ford, A. C. Faecal microbiota transplantation for Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Med. J. Aust. 207, 166–172 (2017).
PubMed Google Scholar
Nguyen, T. L. A., Vieira-Silva, S., Liston, A. & Raes, J. How informative is the mouse for human gut microbiota research? Dis. Model. Mech. 8, 1–16 (2015).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Qin, Q. et al. A metagenome-wide association study of the gut microbiome and metabolic syndrome. Front. Microbiol. 12, 682721 (2021).
MathSciNet PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhang, C. et al. Assessment of the safety and probiotic properties of Roseburia intestinalis: a potential ‘Next Generation Probiotic’. Front. Microbiol. 13, 973046 (2022).
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhao, C. et al. Commensal cow Roseburia reduces gut-dysbiosis-induced mastitis through inhibiting bacterial translocation by producing butyrate in mice. Cell Rep. 41, 111681 (2022).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ruan, G. et al. Roseburia intestinalis and its metabolite butyrate inhibit colitis and upregulate TLR5 through the SP3 signaling pathway. Nutrients 14, 3041 (2022).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Maya-Lucas, O. et al. The gut microbiome of Mexican children affected by obesity. Anaerobe 55, 11–23 (2019).
PubMed Google Scholar
Atzeni, A. et al. Taxonomic and functional fecal microbiota signatures associated with insulin resistance in non-diabetic subjects with overweight/obesity within the frame of the PREDIMED-Plus Study. Front. Endocrinol. 13, 804455 (2022).
Google Scholar
Vacca, M. et al. The Controversial role of human gut lachnospiraceae. Microorganisms 8, 573 (2020).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kim, K. et al. Role of an unclassified Lachnospiraceae in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes: a longitudinal study of the urine microbiome and metabolites. Exp. Mol. Med. 54, 1125–1132 (2022).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Carrizales-Sánchez, A. K., García-Cayuela, T., Hernández-Brenes, C. & Senés-Guerrero, C. Gut microbiota associations with metabolic syndrome and relevance of its study in pediatric subjects. Gut Microbes 13, 1960135 (2021).
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Wutthi-In, M. et al. Gut microbiota profiles of treated metabolic syndrome patients and their relationship with metabolic health. Sci. Rep. 10, 10085 (2020).
ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zeng, L. et al. Decision making at a subcellular level determines the outcome of bacteriophage infection. Cell 141, 682–691 (2010).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Oh, J.-H. et al. Dietary fructose and microbiota-derived short-chain fatty acids promote bacteriophage production in the gut symbiont Lactobacillus reuteri. Cell Host Microbe 25, 273–284.e6 (2019).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Erez, Z. et al. Communication between viruses guides lysis-lysogeny decisions. Nature 541, 488–493 (2017).
ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Silveira, C. B. & Rohwer, F. L. Piggyback-the-Winner in host-associated microbial communities. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 2, 16010 (2016).
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Castro-Mejía, J. L. et al. Optimizing protocols for extraction of bacteriophages prior to metagenomic analyses of phage communities in the human gut. Microbiome 3, 64 (2015).
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Fujimoto, K. & Uematsu, S. Phage therapy for Clostridioides difficile infection. Front. Immunol. 13, 1057892 (2022).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Meijnikman, A. S. et al. Microbiome-derived ethanol in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Nat. Med. 28, 2100–2106 (2022).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Cammarota, G. et al. European consensus conference on faecal microbiota transplantation in clinical practice. Gut 66, 569–580 (2017).
PubMed Google Scholar
Ianiro, G. et al. Reorganisation of faecal microbiota transplant services during the COVID-19 pandemic. Gut 69, 1555–1563 (2020).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Thurber, R. V., Haynes, M., Breitbart, M., Wegley, L. & Rohwer, F. Laboratory procedures to generate viral metagenomes. Nat. Protoc. 4, 470–483 (2009).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Patel, A. et al. Virus and prokaryote enumeration from planktonic aquatic environments by epifluorescence microscopy with SYBR Green I. Nat. Protoc. 2, 269–276 (2007).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Hoyles, L. et al. Characterization of virus-like particles associated with the human faecal and caecal microbiota. Res. Microbiol. 165, 803–812 (2014).
ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Liang, G. et al. Dynamics of the stool virome in very early-onset inflammatory bowel disease. J. Crohns. Colitis 14, 1600–1610 (2020).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Jian, C., Luukkonen, P., Yki-Järvinen, H., Salonen, A. & Korpela, K. Quantitative PCR provides a simple and accessible method for quantitative microbiota profiling. PLoS One 15, e0227285 (2020).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Castor EDC. Castor Electronic Data Capture. https://castoredc.com (2022).
Stichting Voedingscentrum Nederland. Eetmeter. https://mijn.voedingscentrum.nl/nl/eetmeter/ (2023).
Attaye, I., van der Vossen, E. W. J., Mendes Bastos, D. N., Nieuwdorp, M. & Levin, E. Introducing the Continuous Glucose Data Analysis (CGDA) R Package: an intuitive package to analyze continuous glucose monitoring data. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 16, 783–785 (2022).
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Chen, S., Zhou, Y., Chen, Y. & Gu, J. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 34, i884–i890 (2018).
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Roux, S. et al. Optimizing de novo genome assembly from PCR-amplified metagenomes. PeerJ 7, e6902 (2019).
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Nurk, S., Meleshko, D., Korobeynikov, A. & Pevzner, P. A. metaSPAdes: a new versatile metagenomic assembler. Genome Res. 27, 824–834 (2017).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Li, D., Liu, C.-M., Luo, R., Sadakane, K. & Lam, T.-W. MEGAHIT: an ultra-fast single-node solution for large and complex metagenomics assembly via succinct de Bruijn graph. Bioinformatics 31, 1674–1676 (2015).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Guo, J. et al. VirSorter2: a multi-classifier, expert-guided approach to detect diverse DNA and RNA viruses. Microbiome 9, 37 (2021).
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Nayfach, S. et al. CheckV assesses the quality and completeness of metagenome-assembled viral genomes. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 578–585 (2021).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Camacho, C. et al. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinforma. 10, 421 (2009).
Google Scholar
Bin Jang, H. et al. Taxonomic assignment of uncultivated prokaryotic virus genomes is enabled by gene-sharing networks. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 632–639 (2019).
Google Scholar
Langmead, B., Trapnell, C., Pop, M. & Salzberg, S. L. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol. 10, R25 (2009).
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Roux, S., Emerson, J. B., Eloe-Fadrosh, E. A. & Sullivan, M. B. Benchmarking viromics: an in silico evaluation of metagenome-enabled estimates of viral community composition and diversity. PeerJ 5, e3817 (2017).
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Quinlan, A. R. & Hall, I. M. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 26, 841–842 (2010).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Danecek, P. et al. Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools. Gigascience 10, giab008 (2021).
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Milanese, A. et al. Microbial abundance, activity and population genomic profiling with mOTUs2. Nat. Commun. 10, 1014 (2019).
ADS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kang, D. D. et al. MetaBAT 2: an adaptive binning algorithm for robust and efficient genome reconstruction from metagenome assemblies. PeerJ 7, e7359 (2019).
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Parks, D. H., Imelfort, M., Skennerton, C. T., Hugenholtz, P. & Tyson, G. W. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 25, 1043–1055 (2015).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Parks, D. H. et al. Recovery of nearly 8,000 metagenome-assembled genomes substantially expands the tree of life. Nat. Microbiol. 2, 1533–1542 (2017).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Chaumeil, P.-A., Mussig, A. J., Hugenholtz, P. & Parks, D. H. GTDB-Tk: a toolkit to classify genomes with the Genome Taxonomy Database. Bioinformatics 36, 1925–1927 (2019).
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Couvin, D. et al. CRISPRCasFinder, an update of CRISRFinder, includes a portable version, enhanced performance and integrates search for Cas proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, W246–W251 (2018).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Dixon, P. VEGAN, a package of R functions for community ecology. J. Veg. Sci. 14, 927–930 (2003).
Google Scholar
Gloor, G. B., Macklaim, J. M., Pawlowsky-Glahn, V. & Egozcue, J. J. Microbiome datasets are compositional: and this is not optional. Front. Microbiol. 8, 2224 (2017).
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lin, H. & Peddada, S. D. Analysis of compositions of microbiomes with bias correction. Nat. Commun. 11, 3514 (2020).
ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We want to thank Aline Fenneman, Klaartje de Bruin and Melanie Benard for their help with stool donor recruitment and screening. In addition, we thank Veera Houttu, Ulrika Boulund, Kim Dzobo and Torsten Scheithauer for performing the randomisation to guarantee blinding of the investigator and volunteer. We would also like to thank Ana Gerós, Yannick van Schajik and Stephanie Handana for their help in setting up the faecal filtrate production and optimisation. We are grateful for the help of the gastroenterology department of the Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, for their support with the Cortrak®2 enteral access system. We also like to acknowledge the Microbiota Centre Amsterdam for their help with the DNA isolation of the faecal samples and the Genomics core of the Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, for their advice on the whole genome shotgun sequencing. Finally, we are most grateful for the volunteers who participated in this clinical pilot study. Researchers were supported by various grants. K.W. was supported by a Novo Nordisk Foundation CAMIT grant 2018 (28232) to M.N. and a Diabetes II Breakthrough grant (459001008) to H.H.; P.A.dJ. and T.P.M.S. were supported by DDRF Senior fellowship (2019.82.004) to H.H.; I.A. was supported through a Le Ducq consortium grant (17CVD01) to M.N.; M.N. was supported by a personal ZONMW-VICI grant 2020 (09150182010020) and a Le Ducq consortium grant (17CVD01). H.H. was supported by a Senior Fellowship of the Dutch Diabetes Research Foundation (2019.82.004). The funders had no role in the study design, the collection, analysis and interpretation of data, the writing of the report and the decision to submit the article for publication.

Author information

These authors contributed equally: Koen Wortelboer, Patrick A. de Jonge.

Authors and Affiliations

Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Experimental Vascular Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Koen Wortelboer, Patrick A. de Jonge, Torsten P. M. Scheithauer, E. Marleen Kemper, Max Nieuwdorp & Hilde Herrema
Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Diabetes & Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Koen Wortelboer, Patrick A. de Jonge, Torsten P. M. Scheithauer, Ilias Attaye, Max Nieuwdorp & Hilde Herrema
Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Endocrinology, metabolism and nutrition, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Koen Wortelboer, Patrick A. de Jonge, Torsten P. M. Scheithauer, Ilias Attaye, Max Nieuwdorp & Hilde Herrema
Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Vascular Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Ilias Attaye & Max Nieuwdorp
Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Department of Pharmacy and Clinical Pharmacology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
E. Marleen Kemper
Amsterdam UMC location Vrije University Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Diabetes Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Max Nieuwdorp

Authors

Koen Wortelboer
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Patrick A. de Jonge
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Torsten P. M. Scheithauer
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Ilias Attaye
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
E. Marleen Kemper
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Max Nieuwdorp
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Hilde Herrema
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

H.H. and M.N. conceived the research idea and designed the study; K.W. performed the clinical study; K.W. and T.P.M.S. processed the samples in the laboratory; P.A.dJ., K.W. and I.A. performed data analysis; K.W. and P.A.dJ. wrote the first draft of the manuscript; All authors contributed to manuscript revision, read and approved the submitted version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hilde Herrema.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

M.N. is founder and scientific advisor of Caelus Health, however none of this bears any relevance to the content of the current paper. K.W., P.A.dJ., T.P.M.S., I.A., E.M.K. and H.H. report no conflict of interest.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Peer Review File

Description of Additional Supplementary Files

Supplementary Dataset 1

Reporting Summary

Source data

Source Data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wortelboer, K., de Jonge, P.A., Scheithauer, T.P.M. et al. Phage-microbe dynamics after sterile faecal filtrate transplantation in individuals with metabolic syndrome: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial assessing efficacy and safety. Nat Commun 14, 5600 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-41329-z

Download citation

Received: 08 March 2023
Accepted: 24 August 2023
Published: 12 September 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-41329-z

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Subjects

Abstract

Similar content being viewed by others

Introduction

Results

Inclusion of subjects and donors

FFT is safe and well-tolerated

FFT improved glucose variability

Bacterial and viral diversity remain stable after FFT

Increase in new phages independent of the intervention

FFT alters the phage composition of the VLP fraction

FFT induces an antagonistic phage-microbe interaction

Discussion

Methods

Study design

Study subjects

Donor screening

Sterile faecal filtrate production and administration

Outcomes

Sample size calculation

Randomisation

Oral glucose tolerance test and biochemical measurements

Continuous glucose monitoring

Faeces collection

Bacteriome and virome sequencing

VLP sequencing

Sequence assembly

Viral sequence recognition and clustering

Viral read depth determination

Bacterial community profiling and binning

Determining phage-host links

Statistical analyses

Differential abundance

Phage-host interactions

Patient and public involvement statement

Ethics approval and informed consent statement

Reporting summary

Data availability

Code availability

References

Acknowledgements

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Contributions

Corresponding author

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Peer review

Peer review information

Additional information

Supplementary information

Source data

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Share this article

Comments

Search

Quick links