Abstract
The Fischer carbene synthesis, involving the conversion of a transition metal (TM)-bound CO ligand to a carbene ligand of the form [=C(OR’)R] (R, R’ = organyl groups), is one of the seminal reactions in the history of organometallic chemistry. Carbonyl complexes of p-block elements, of the form [E(CO)n] (E = main-group fragment), are much less abundant than their TM cousins; this scarcity and the general instability of low-valent p-block species means that replicating the historical reactions of TM carbonyls is often very difficult. Here we present a step-for-step replica of the Fischer carbene synthesis at a borylene carbonyl involving nucleophilic attack at the carbonyl carbon followed by electrophilic quenching at the resultant acylate oxygen atom. These reactions provide borylene acylates and alkoxy-/silyloxy-substituted alkylideneboranes, main-group analogues of the archetypal transition metal acylate and Fischer carbene families, respectively. When either the incoming electrophile or the boron center has a modest steric profile, the electrophile instead attacks at the boron atom, leading to carbene-stabilized acylboranes – boron analogues of the well-known transition metal acyl complexes. These results constitute faithful main-group replicas of a number of historical organometallic processes and pave the way to further advances in the field of main-group metallomimetics.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The 1964 synthesis of [(OC)5W{=C(OMe)Me}] by E. O. Fischer and A. Maasböl marked the first synthesis of a TM carbene complex1. Although the 1973 Nobel Prize in Chemistry to E. O. Fischer and G. Wilkinson was officially awarded for their independent work on sandwich complexes2, the fact that Fischer dedicated the entirety of his Nobel Lecture to transition-metal (TM) carbene and carbyne chemistry is a striking testament to the importance of metal-carbon multiple bonding. Thereafter followed decades of major advances in the field, for instance the development of the Fischer / Schrock carbene duality concept3,4, the Dötz reaction5, and olefin metathesis6, to name just a few. The implications of metal-carbon multiple bonding have since suffused further afield into organic chemistry, catalysis, nanoscience7 and beyond, and no teaching course on organometallic chemistry is complete without a thorough treatment of the topic.
The ability of main-group compounds to mimic the reactivity of transition metals has been gradually realized over the last 15 years8,9,10. This is mainly due to impressive advances in the synthesis of main-group carbene complexes and low-valent p-block species11,12, the latter of which often have TM-like orbital properties. Particularly, the presence of filled and vacant orbitals that are close both in space and energy allows such low-valent main-group ambiphiles to cleave strong bonds of reactants and thus “activate” relatively inert species13. This bonding situation can be created both using dual-site ambiphiles (i.e., frustrated Lewis pairs14), or single-site ambiphiles (e.g., carbenes, borylenes15). A noteworthy achievement in this regard is our binding, reduction (and in some cases also coupling) of dinitrogen mediated by a transient, superambiphilic borylene species16,17,18.
Despite the achievements in the chemistry of these “main-group metallomimetics”, the replication of organometallic reactions by p-block species is mostly limited to the field of small-molecule activation, and many archetypal organometallic processes still have no main-group counterparts. This is likely due to both: (a) the generally difficult synthesis and high reactivity of low-valent p-block species, and (b) limitations of the main-group metallomimetic concept itself. In other words, despite their similarities, main-group elements still have more limited oxidation state and orbital flexibility than TMs. One of the most promising families of boron metallomimetics has been the borylene mono- and dicarbonyls, of the form [L2-nRB(CO)n] (n = 1, 2; L = neutral Lewis base)19,20,21,22,23,24, which have shown the propensity to undergo photodecarbonylation and ligand exchange, both of which are well-established processes of TM carbonyl complexes.
These reactions prompted us to question whether borylene carbonyls could serve as metallomimetic scaffolds for replicating other classical reactivity patterns of TM carbonyl complexes. We envisaged that a carbene-stabilized borylene carbonyl ([LRB(CO)], L = carbene donor) might allow us to demonstrate a main-group analogue of the Fischer carbene synthesis protocol (Fig. 1a). A further promising sign was our recent discovery that, under reducing conditions, a borylene carbonyl undergoes intramolecular migration of an aryl group to its carbonyl carbon atom, decomposing the carbene unit but furnishing a “bora-Fischer carbene” species23. In this work, we present the controlled nucleophilic attack at the carbonyl carbon atom of a borylene carbonyl, followed by quenching of the resulting borylene acylate with an electrophile, leading to alkoxy-/silyloxy-substituted alkylideneboranes. Varying the electrophile in certain cases leads to attack at the boron atom and the isolation of carbene adducts of acylboranes – boron analogues of the well-known transition-metal acyl complexes. Together, the reactions demonstrate main-group analogues of three of the key elemental reactions in the chemistry of TM carbonyl chemistry.
Results and discussion
Step one: nucleophilic attack at a carbonyl ligand
The first step of the historical Fischer carbene synthesis1,2 is the nucleophilic attack at the carbon atom of a metal-bound CO ligand, forming an anionic complex with an acylate ligand ([LnM(C(O)R)]–) (Fig. 1a). This step is essentially a variant of the first step of another foundational organometallic reaction from 1931, the Hieber base reaction, in which a hydroxide anion (OH–) attacks at the carbon atom of [Fe(CO)5], forming the anionic acylate complex [(OC)5Fe–C(O)OH]–25. Our attempts to recreate this reaction centered on two borylene carbonyls stabilized by a cyclic (alkyl)(amino)carbene (CAAC; 1-(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)−3,3,5,5-tetramethylpyrrolidin-2-ylidene), namely [(CAAC)BDur(CO)] (1a; Dur = 2,3,5,6-tetramethylphenyl) and [(CAAC)BH(CO)] (1b, present as a ca. 1:1 mixture of E/Z isomers24. Treatment of 1a,b with the aryl nucleophiles phenyllithium and mesityllithium, respectively, provided highly reactive red solids 2a,b (Fig. 1b). Complex 2a could only be characterized by its 11B NMR spectrum and a single-crystal X-ray diffraction (SCXRD) study that provided poor data suitable for establishment of its connectivity. However, complex 2b was fully characterized by NMR spectroscopy (1H, 7Li, 11B, 13C), high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) and SCXRD. Their solid-state structures indicated that complexes 2a,b were indeed the desired borylene acylate species resulting from the nucleophilic attack at the positively charged boron atom of complexes 1a,b (for ADCH of 1b partial charges see Supplementary Fig. 28), which crystallize as their lithium-bound dimers (Fig. 2a). In both compounds, the OCBCN segments are only slightly distorted from planar and suggest a high degree of π-delocalization in this unit. This delocalization is reflected in the fact that the distances between the boron atom and its attached carbon atoms are very similar (2a: B–CCAAC 1.510(8), 1.496(9) Å; B–Cacyl 1.520(7), 1.532(8) Å; 2b: B–CCAAC 1.507(6), 1.508(6) Å; B–Cacyl 1.502(5), 1.494(5) Å). Resonances in the 11B NMR spectra of 2a,b were found at relatively high field (2a: 24.0 ppm; 2b: 10.8 ppm), suggesting relatively high electron density at the boron atom. However, these are still significantly downfield of the resonances of their respective precursor borylene carbonyls (1a: −13.4 ppm21; 1b: –23.9, –24.5 ppm24), which are electron-rich, low-valent boron species. To our knowledge, only one other such borylene acylate species is known in the literature, a potassium-bound dimer reported by our group, which is generated by an unusual reduction / aryl migration process from a borylene carbonyl23. This compound has an analogous structure to 2a,b, with a delocalized OCBCN unit, B–CCAAC and B–Cacyl distances of 1.503(2) and 1.518(2) Å, and an 11B NMR resonance at 15.0 ppm.
Step two: electrophilic quench of borylene acylates
The second step of the Fischer carbene synthesis is the electrophilic quenching of the anionic acylate complex of the form [LnM(C(O)R)]–, whereby the electrophile (E+) adds at the acylate oxygen atom, furnishing the Fischer carbene species [LnM = C(OE)R]2. Alternatively, attack of the electrophile at the metal center may take place, providing an acyl complex (Fig. 1a) that inevitably undergoes reductive elimination of the –E and –C(O)R ligands as an aldehyde (E = H) or ketone (E = organyl group)26,27. Of these two options, the Fischer carbene pathway is generally favored when: (a) the metal center is relatively electron poor (i.e., the metal does not compete with the acylate oxygen in terms of nucleophilicity), (b) the electrophile is sterically bulky and may struggle to approach the crowded metal site, and/or (c) the electrophile is relatively “hard” and thus a good match for an acylate oxygen nucleophile.
Astonishingly, for each of the two borylene acylate species 2a,b, both the reaction pathways described above (electrophilic attack at acylate oxygen or “metal”) were found to be possible by employing different electrophiles. Treatment of 2a with methyl triflate, and 2b with trimethylsilyl chloride, led to isolation of 3a (53% yield) and 3b (82% yield), respectively, as red solids (Fig. 1b). Their 11B NMR spectroscopic resonances (3a: 19.0 ppm; 3b: 15.3 ppm) are found in a similar region to those of their acylate precursors, the former having moved slightly upfield and the latter slightly downfield; likely a consequence of the disparate nature of the two electrophiles (i.e., carbon- vs. silicon-centered). In their solid-state structures (Fig. 2b) the two B–C bonds of the OCBCN units of 3a,b are much more distinct in length (3a: B–CCAAC 1.551(3), 1.560(3) Å; B=C(OE)R 1.487(3), 1.492(3) Å; 3b: B–CCAAC 1.532(2) Å; B=C(OE)R 1.467(2) Å) than those of the acylate precursors 2a,b, indicating greater B=C(OE)R double-bond character and suggesting that they are best described as CAAC-stabilized alkoxy-/silyloxyalkylideneboranes, or alternatively “bora-Fischer carbenes”. These spectroscopic and structural data are in line with those of the three previously reported CAAC-stabilized alkylideneboranes bearing hydroxy, alkoxy or silyloxy groups at the alkylidene carbon atom23, the 11B NMR resonances of which are in the range 15–18 ppm, and which also feature more B=C(OE)R double-bond character (B=C(OE)R 1.47–1.48 Å).
The presence of both Fischer-type and heterocyclic carbene units bound to boron in the complexes provides a rare opportunity to directly compare these two ligand types28. Based on DFT calculations, the nature of the bonding in compounds 3a,b can be described according to Fig. 3, whereby both carbenes are σ-donors to the boron, and the boron atom in turn provides π backdonation. The Mayer bond orders (MBOs) within compound 3b suggest that there is strong π delocalization in the CBC unit, but that the B=CFischer bond (MBO: 1.31) is slightly stronger than the B=CCAAC bond (MBO: 1.31). Similarly, the HOMO comprises the CBC π interaction and suggests that the B=C π bonding is slightly stronger to the Fischer carbene than the CAAC unit.
Protonation of in-situ-generated acylate complex 2a with triethylammonium chloride ([HNEt3]Cl) provided acylborane adduct 4a as an orange solid (36% yield), while treatment of 2b with ethyl bromide provided the analogous 4b as its pale yellow complex with lithium bromide, [LiBr(4b)2] (82% yield) (Figs. 1b, 2c). Attempts to sequester the LiBr by dissolving the compound in non-polar solvents such as benzene and hexane in order to obtain pure 4b were unsuccessful. Both acylborane adducts showed doublet resonances in their 11B NMR spectra (4a: –14.8 ppm, 1JBH = 77.2 Hz; [LiBr(4b)2]: –12.7 ppm, 2JBH = 84.6 Hz) thanks to coupling with their boron-bound hydrides. While acylboranes (RC(O)BR'2) and acylborates ([RC(O)BR'3]–) are well known and synthetically useful species29,30, to our knowledge, structurally authenticated singly base-stabilized acylboranes (RC(O)BR'2L; R = organyl group) such as 4a,b are unknown.
The divergent reactions of the borylene acylates 2a,b with different electrophiles invites analysis in light of the determinants for electrophilic attack at either the metal or acylate oxygen of TM acylate complexes, as outlined in Fig. 1a (right side)26,27. Given that both variants occur with both borylene ([(CAAC)BR]) scaffolds, the electron density of the borylene unit itself is likely not a determinant of the reaction pathway for these compounds. This is borne out by the very similar calculated atomic dipole-moment-corrected Hirshfeld (ADCH) charges of the boron and acylate oxygen atoms of 2b (B: −0.241; O: −0.331). In comparison, the negative charge of the tungsten acylate complex used in the original Fischer carbene synthesis ([(OC)5M(C(O)Ph)]–) is much more concentrated at the acylate O atom than the W atom (W: −0.068; O: −0.411). The softness/hardness of the electrophile can also be ruled out as a factor given that there is no clear pattern of matching soft or hard electrophiles and nucleophiles in the reactions shown in Fig. 1b (e.g., the alkyl electrophile attacks at the acyl oxygen of 2a but the boron atom of 2b, etc.). Therefore, the electrophilic quenching reactions in Fig. 1b appear to be under steric control, as for each borylene acylate the smaller electrophile attacks at the far more crowded boron site while the larger electrophile attacks at the less crowded oxygen site. It should be noted that many more electrophilic quench reactions were attempted with a variety of electrophiles; however, only those shown in Fig. 1b led to tractable products, preventing us from obtaining a more general overview of the factors underpinning the regioselectivity. In addition, in each quench reaction shown, the presented product (either of type 3 or 4) was the sole product in the reaction mixture at full consumption of the precursor, and the alternative isomer was not detected.
In conclusion, we present herein a step-for-step main-group analogue of the Fischer carbene synthesis, resulting in carbene-stabilized alkoxy-/silyloxy-substituted alkylideneboranes, which can be considered boron analogues of conventional, transition-metal Fischer carbene complexes. Alternatively, by varying the electrophilic reagent in the synthesis, boron analogues of archetypal TM acyl complexes can be prepared. These reactions extend the use of p-block species as mimics of transition metals beyond small-molecule activation by replicating multi-step syntheses that are of historical and pedagogical importance in traditional, transition-metal-based organometallic chemistry. This work also opens up diverse opportunities in developing further metallomimetic chemistry using low-valent boron species, in particular replicating well-known reactions of TM Fischer carbenes, e.g., the Dötz reaction, olefin metathesis, or the synthesis of main-group analogues of Fischer carbynes. Work in our laboratories is underway with these goals in mind.
Methods
General synthetic considerations
All manipulations were performed either under an atmosphere of dry argon or in vacuo using standard Schlenk line or glovebox techniques. Deuterated solvents were dried over molecular sieves and degassed by three freeze-pump-thaw cycles prior to use. All other solvents were distilled and degassed from appropriate drying agents. Solvents were stored under argon over activated 4 Å molecular sieves. NMR spectra were acquired on a Bruker Avance 400 or 500 NMR spectrometer. Chemical shifts (δ) are provided in ppm and internally referenced to the carbon nuclei (13C{1H}) or residual protons (1H) of the solvent. Heteronuclei NMR spectra are referenced to external standards (11B: BF3\(\bullet\)OEt2). Solid-state IR spectra were recorded on a Bruker FT-IR spectrometer ALPHA II inside a glovebox. UV-vis spectra were measured on a METTLER TOLEDO UV-vis-Excellence UV5 spectrophotometer inside a glovebox. Microanalyses (C, H, N) were performed on an Elementar vario MICRO cube elemental analyzer. High-resolution mass spectrometry data were obtained from a Thermo Scientific Exactive Plus spectrometer in LIFDI or ASAP mode. Syntheses of known compounds following published procedures can be found in the Supplementary methods section of the Supplementary Data file, with accompanying Supplementary Figs. 29–33.
Synthesis of new compounds
Synthesis of [(CAAC)B(Dur)=C(Ph)(OMe)] (3a)
[(CAAC)BDur(CO)] (1a) (100 mg, 219 µmol) was dissolved in 20 mL of benzene and phenyllithium (40.4 mg, 481 µmol) was added. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 3 h and methyltrifluoromethanesulfonate (79.3 mg, 483 µmol) was added. After 2 h of stirring at room temperature all volatiles were removed in vacuo. The solid residue was extracted with hexane and recrystallized at –30 °C, yielding [(CAAC)B(Dur)=C(Ph)(OMe)] (3a) as a red solid in 53% yield (63.8 mg, 116 µmol). 1H NMR (500.1 MHz, 298 K, C6D6): δ = 7.08 (s, 3H, Dip-CH), 6.83–6.89 (m, 4H, Ph-CH), 6.78 (s, 1H, Dur-CH), 6.75–6.72 (m, 1H, p-Ph-CH), 3.24 (sept, 3JHH = 6.6 Hz, 2H, CH(CH3)2), 2.47 (s, 6H, o-Dur-CH3), 2.42 (s, 3H, OCH3), 2.17 (s, 6H, m-Dur-CH3), 1.67–1.59 (m, 6H, CH(CH3)2), 1.33 (d, 3JHH = 6.6 Hz, 6H, CH(CH3)2), 1.25 (s, 6H, CC(CH3)2), 1.02 (s, 6H, NC(CH3)2) ppm. 13C NMR (125.8 MHz, 298 K, C6D6) (BCqO could not be detected): δ = 194.6 (Ccarbene), 146.4 (i-Dip-Cq), 144.1 (Ph-Cq), 138.8 (o-Dip-Cq), 138.3 (m-Dur-Cq), 131.8 (o-Dur-Cq), 129.4 (Dur-CH), 129.1 (m-Ph-CH), 128.1 (Dip-CH), 126.1 (o-Ph-CH), 125.2 (p-Ph-CH), 124.0 (Dip-CH), 72.8 (NC(CH3)2), 57.1 (OCH3), 55.3 (CH2), 51.6 (CC(CH3)2), 30.3 (CC(CH3)2), 29.8 (CH(CH3)2), 29.3 (NC(CH3)2), 26.5 (CH(CH3)2), 24.5 (CH(CH3)2), 23.0 (o-Dur-CH3), 21.0 (m-Dur-CH3) ppm. 11B NMR (160.5 MHz, 298 K, C6D6): δ = 19.0 (s) ppm. LIFDI-HRMS calculated for [C36H52BNO] = [M]+ 549.4136; found: 549.4141.
Synthesis of [(CAAC)B(Dur)(H)C(=O)(Ph)] (4a)
[(CAAC)BDur(CO)] (1a) (30 mg, 65.6 µmol) was dissolved in 0.5 mL of benzene and phenyllithium (12.1 mg, 144 µmol) was added. The reaction mixture was left at room temperature for 3 h and triethylammonium chloride (20.1 mg, 146 µmol) was added. After 2 h at room temperature all volatiles were removed in vacuo. The solid residue was washed with hexane (3 ×1 mL) and recrystallized at –30 °C from THF, yielding [(CAAC)B(Dur)(H)C(=O)(Ph)] (4a) as an orange solid in 36% yield (12.6 mg, 23.6 µmol). 1H NMR (400.6 MHz, 298 K, CD2Cl2): δ = 7.37 (d, 3JHH = 7.7 Hz 1H, o-Ph-CH), 7.32 (t, 3JHH = 7.7 Hz 1H, p-Dip-CH), 7.20 (d, 3JHH = 7.7 Hz 1H, m-Ph-CH), 7.11–7.07 (m, 1H, p-Ph-CH), 7.02 (t, 3JHH = 7.5 Hz 2H, m-Dip-CH), 6.97 (d, 3JHH = 7.5 Hz 1H, o-Ph-CH), 6.66 (s, 1H, Dur-CH), 4.06 (q, 1JBH = 74.84 Hz, BH), 3.10 (sept., 3JHH = 6.8 Hz 1H, CH(CH3)2), 2.63 (sept., 3JHH = 6.3 Hz, 1H, CH(CH3)2), 2.43 (s (br), 6H, o-Dur-CH3), 2.08 (s (br), 6H, m-Dur-CH3), 2.07 (d, 3JHH = 12.8 Hz 1H, CH2), 1.99 (d, 3JHH = 12.8 Hz 1H, CH2), 1.78 (d, 3JHH = 6.3 Hz, 3H, CH(CH3)2), 1.64 (s, 3H, NC(CH3)2), 1.43 (s, 3H, CC(CH3)2), 1.37 (d, 3JHH = 6.4 Hz, 3H, CH(CH3)2), 1.28 (s, 3H, NC(CH3)2), 1.19 (d, 3JHH = 6.8 Hz, 3H, CH(CH3)2), 1.18 (s, 3H, CC(CH3)2), 1.03 (d, 3JHH = 6.5 Hz, 3H, CH(CH3)2) ppm. 13C NMR (100.7 MHz, 298 K, C6D6) (BCqO could not be detected): δ = 146.7 (o-Dip-Cq), 145.1 (i-Dip-Cq), 139.9 (m-Dur-Cq), 138.6 (o-Dur-Cq) 136.5 (i-Ph-Cq), 129.3 (Dur-CH), 129.2 (p-Dip-CH), 129.1 (p-Ph-CH), 127.1 (m-Ph-CH), 127.1 (m-Dip-CH), 125.7 (o-Ph-CH), 125.2 (o-Ph-CH), 77.9 (NC(CH3)2), 54.8 (CC(CH3)2), 54.7 (CH2), 30.8 (CC(CH3)2), 30.3 (NC(CH3)2), 30.2 (CH(CH3)2), 29.2 (CH(CH3)2), 29.0 (NC(CH3)2), 28.4 (CH(CH3)2), 27.5 (CH(CH3)2), 26.4 (CC(CH3)2), 25.4 (CH(CH3)2), 25.1 (CH(CH3)2), 22.5 (o-Dur-CH3), 21.3 (m-Dur-CH3) ppm. 11B NMR (128.5 MHz, 298 K, C6D6): δ = –14.8 (d, 1JBH = 77.2 Hz, BH) ppm. LIFDI-HRMS calculated for [C36H52BNO] = [M]+ 549.4136; found: 549.4141.
Synthesis of [(CAAC)B(H)=C(Mes)(OLi(OEt2))] (2b)
[(CAAC)BH(CO)] (1b) (20 mg, 61.5 µmol) and mesityllithium etherate (16 mg, 80.0 µmol) were suspended in diethyl ether (0.7 mL). After 1 h at room temperature the reaction mixture was filtered and crystallized at –30 °C, yielding [(CAAC)B(H)=C(Mes)(OLi(OEt2))] (2b) as a red solid in 96% yield (31 mg, 58.9 µmol). 1H NMR (500.1 MHz, 298 K, C6D6): δ = 6.98 (dd, 1H, 3JHH = 7.5 Hz, 3JHH = 7.5 Hz, p-Dip-CH), 6.94 (d, 2H, 3JHH = 7.5 Hz, m-Dip-CH), 6.44 (s, 2H, Mes-CH), 3.38 (q, 4H, 3JHH = 7.0 Hz, Et2O-CH2), 3.22 (sept, 2H, 3JHH = 6.8 Hz, CH(CH3)2), 2.63 (br, 1H, BH), 2.16 (s, 6H, o-Mes-CH3), 2.05 (s, 3H, p-Mes-CH3), 1.95 (s, 2H, CH2), 1.83 (s, 6H, CC(CH3)2), 1.18 (d, 6H, 3JHH = 6.8 Hz, CH(CH3)2), 1.15 (d, 6H, 3JHH = 6.7 Hz, CH(CH3)2), 1.12 (s, 6H, NC(CH3)2), 1.12 (t, 6H, 3JHH = 7.0 Hz, Et2O-CH3) ppm. 13C NMR (125.8 MHz, 298 K, C6D6) (BCqO could not be detected): δ = 182.3 (CCarbene), 155.4 (i-Mes-Cq), 150.0 (i-Dip-Cq), 139.4 (o-Dip-Cq), 132.9 (o-Mes-Cq), 131.6 (p-Mes-Cq), 127.5 (Mes-CH), 126.6 (p-Dip-CH), 123.8 (m-Dip-CH), 66.3 (Et2O-CH2), 66.3 (NC(CH3)2), 58.8 (CH2), 45.9 (CC(CH3)2), 31.0 (CC(CH3)2), 30.3 (NC(CH3)2), 29.1 (CH(CH3)2), 27.2 (CH(CH3)2), 24.2 (CH(CH3)2), 21.0 (p-Mes-CH3), 20.2 (o-Mes-CH3), 15.7 (Et2O-CH3) ppm. 7Li NMR (194.4 MHz, 298 K, C6D6): δ = 0.2 (s) ppm. 11B NMR (160.5 MHz, 298 K, C6D6): δ = 10.8 (s) ppm. LIFDI-HRMS calculated for [C30H44BNO] = [M-Et2O-Li]+ 445.3510; found: 445.3508.
Synthesis of [(CAAC)B(H)=C(Mes)(OSiMe3)] (3b)
[(CAAC)BH(CO)] (1b) (20 mg, 61.5 µmol) and mesityllithium etherate (16 mg, 80.0 µmol) were suspended in diethyl ether (0.7 mL). The reaction mixture was left at room temperature for 20 min and chlorotrimethylsilane (60 mg, 552 µmol) was added. After 1 h at room temperature all volatiles were removed in vacuo. The solid residue was extracted with hexane and recrystallized, yielding [(CAAC)B(H)=C(Mes)(OSiMe3)] (3b) as a orange solid in 82% yield (26 mg, 50.2 µmol). 1H NMR (500.1 MHz, 298 K, C6D6): δ = 7.22 (dd, 1H, 3JHH = 6.7 Hz, 3JHH = 8.6 Hz, p-Dip-CH), 7.16 (br d (coincides with solvent), 1H, m-Dip-CH), 7.14 (br d, 3JHH = 8.5 Hz, 1H, m-Dip-CH), 6.90 (s, 2H, Mes-CH), 3.50 (br, 1H, BH), 2.88 (sept, 2H, 3JHH = 6.7 Hz, CH(CH3)2), 2.60 (s, 6H, o-Mes-CH3), 2.20 (s, 3H, p-Mes-CH3), 1.52 (s, 2H, CH2), 1.50 (d, 6H, 3JHH = 6.7 Hz, CH(CH3)2), 1.21 (d, 6H, 3JHH = 6.7 Hz, CH(CH3)2), 1.19 (s, 6H, CC(CH3)2), 0.95 (s, 6H, NC(CH3)2), 0.22 (s, 9H, Si(CH3)3) ppm. 13C NMR (125.8 MHz, 298 K, C6D6): δ = 207.7 (Ccarbene), 181.5 (BCqO), 146.6 (i-Dip-Cq), 145.1 (i-Mes-Cq), 136.7 (o-Mes-Cq), 135.9 (o-Dip-Cq), 135.7 (p-Mes-Cq), 128.7 (p-Dip-CH), 128.5 (Mes-CH), 124.7 (m-Dip-CH), 70.9 (NC(CH3)2), 55.4 (CH2), 48.5 (CC(CH3)2), 29.8 (CC(CH3)2), 29.3 (CH(CH3)2), 28.9 (NC(CH3)2), 26.3 (CH(CH3)2), 23.9 (CH(CH3)2), 21.3 (p-Mes-CH3), 21.1 (o-Mes-CH3), 1.9 (Si(CH3)3) ppm. 11B NMR (160.5 MHz, 298 K, C6D6): δ = 15.3 (s) ppm. 29Si NMR (99.4 MHz, 298 K, C6D6): δ = 10.0 (s) ppm. LIFDI-HRMS calculated for [C33H52BNOSi] = [M]+ 517.3906; found: 517.3904.
Synthesis of [((CAAC)B(H)(Et)C(=O)(Mes))2LiBr] ([LiBr(4b)2])
[(CAAC)BHCO] (1b) (20 mg, 61.5 µmol) and mesityllithium etherate (16 mg, 80.0 µmol) were suspended in diethyl ether (0.7 mL). The reaction mixture was left at room temperature for 20 min and ethyl bromide (20 mg, 185 µmol) was added. After 2 d at 60 °C all volatiles were removed in vacuo. The solid residue was extracted with hexane and recrystallized. After washing with hexane (2 ×1 mL) [((CAAC)B(H)(Et)C(=O)(Mes))2LiBr] ([LiBr(4b)2]) was obtained as a pale yellow solid in 82% yield (26 mg, 50.3 µmol). 1H NMR (500.1 MHz, 298 K, d8-THF): δ = 7.37 (dd, 1H, 3JHH = 7.9 Hz, 3JHH = 7.9 Hz, p-Dip-CH), 7.29 (dd, 1H, 3JHH = 8.1 Hz, 4JHH = 1.8 Hz, m-Dip-CH), 7.28 (dd, 1H, 3JHH = 8.1 Hz, 4JHH = 1.8 Hz, m-Dip-CH), 6.54 (s, 2H, Mes-CH), 3.23 (sept, 1H, 3JHH = 6.5 Hz, CH(CH3)2), 2.66 (sept, 1H, 3JHH = 6.6 Hz, CH(CH3)2), 2.19 (d, 1H, 2JHH = 12.7 Hz, CCH2), 2.12 (s, 3H, p-Mes-CH3), 2.08 (br, 1H, BH), 2.05 (d, 1H, 2JHH = 12.7 Hz, CCH2), 2.00 (s, 6H, o-Mes-CH3), 1.66 (s, 3H, CC(CH3)2), 1.53 (s, 3H, CC(CH3)2), 1.43 (s, 3H, NC(CH3)2), 1.34 (s, 3H, NC(CH3)2), 1.30 (d, 3H, 3JHH = 6.5 Hz, CH(CH3)2), 1.29 (d, 3H, 3JHH = 6.5 Hz, CH(CH3)2), 1.23 (d, 3H, 3JHH = 6.5 Hz, CH(CH3)2), 1.04 (d, 3H, 3JHH = 6.5 Hz, CH(CH3)2), 0.72–0.62 (m, 1H, BCH2), 0.50–0.39 (m, 1H, BCH2), 0.44 (s, 3H, BCH2CH3) ppm. 13C NMR (125.8 MHz, 298 K, d8-THF) (the signal corresponding to the BCqO nucleus could not be detected): δ = 238.0 (Ccarbene), 149.7 (i-Mes-Cq), 147.0 (o-Dip-Cq), 145.8 (o-Dip-Cq), 135.2 (p-Mes-Cq), 134.7 (i-Dip-Cq), 133.0 (o-Mes-Cq), 129.6 (p-Dip-CH), 128.8 (Mes-CH), 125.9 (m-Dip-CH), 125.2 (m-Dip-CH), 79.0 (NC(CH3)2), 54.3 (CC(CH3)2), 52.6 (CH2), 30.7 (NC(CH3)2), 30.1 (CC(CH3)2), 29.9 (CC(CH3)2), 29.7 (CH(CH3)2), 29.5 (CH(CH3)2), 28.9 (CH(CH3)2), 28.4 (NC(CH3)2), 25.7 (CH(CH3)2), 25.3 (CH(CH3)2), 24.4 (CH(CH3)2), 21.1 (o-Mes-CH3), 20.8 (p-Mes-CH3), 14.3 (BCH2CH3), 12.0 (BCH2CH3) ppm. 7Li NMR (194.4 MHz, 298 K, d8-THF): δ = 0.7 (s) ppm. 11B NMR (160.5 MHz, 298 K, d8-THF): δ = –12.7 (d, 2JBH = 84.6 Hz, BH) ppm. LIFDI-HRMS calculated for [C32H48BNO] = [M]+ 473.3823; found: 473.3823.
Single-crystal X-ray diffraction
General considerations
The crystal data were collected either on a Bruker D8 Quest diffractometer with a CMOS area detector ([(CAAC)B(Dur)=C(Ph)(OMe)] (3a), [(CAAC)B(H)(Dur)C(=O)(Ph)] (4a), [(CAAC)B(H)=C(Mes)(OLi(OEt2))] (2b)) a Bruker X8-APEX II diffractometer with a CCD area detector ([(CAAC)B(Dur)=C(Ph)(OLi)] (2a)), both equipped with multi-layer mirror monochromated Moκα radiation, or a Rigaku OD XtaLAB Synergy-R diffractometer with a HPA area detector, equipped with multi-layer mirror monochromated Cuκα radiation ([(CAAC)B(H)=C(Mes)(OSiMe3)] (3b) and [((CAAC)B(H)(Et)C(=O)(Mes))2LiBr] (4b)). The structures were solved using the intrinsic phasing method31, refined with the ShelXL program32 and expanded using Fourier techniques. All non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically. Hydrogen atoms were included in structure factor calculations. All hydrogen atoms were assigned to idealized positions, except the boron-bound hydrogens, which were detected in the difference Fourier map and freely refined, except when stated otherwise in the refinement details.
Computational details
Geometry optimizations were performed in the gas phase for 2b and Li[(OC)5W(C(O)Ph)] using the B3LYP33,34,35,36 functional with the D337 dispersion correction combined with the def2-SVP38 basis set. All optimized structures were verified as minimum through vibrational frequency calculations, showing no imaginary frequencies. The electronic situation of the compounds was investigated using ADCH39 charges. To support the obtained results for compound 2b, CHelpG40 charges were also calculated and are found to be in good agreement. For Li[(OC)5W(C(O)Ph)], only ADCH was applied. All geometry optimizations and frequency calculations were performed with the Gaussian 16, Revision C.01, program41. The ADCH and CHelpG charges as well as the Mayer bond orders were obtained using Multiwfn 3.8 program42.
Data availability
The NMR and computational data generated in this study are provided in the Supplementary Information file. The crystallographic data used in this study are available in the Cambridge Crystallographic Database under accession codes CCDC 2212592 (2a), 2212593 (2b), 2212594 (3a), 2212591 (3b), 2212589 (4a), and 2212590 ([LiBr(4b)2]). Further data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
References
Fischer, E. O. & Maasböl, A. On the existence of a tungsten carbonyl carbene complex. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 3, 580–581 (1964).
Fischer, E. O. On the Road to Carbene and Carbyne Complexes. Nobel lecture, 11 December, 1973. https://www.nobelprize.org/uploads/2018/06/fischer-lecture.pdf (2022).
Strassner, T. Electronic structure and reactivity of metal carbenes. Top. Organomet. Chem. 13, 1–20 (2004).
Frenking, G., Solà, M. & Vyboishchikov, S. F. Chemical bonding in transition metal carbene complexes. J. Organomet. Chem. 690, 6178–6204 (2005).
Dötz, K. H. & Stendel, J. Jr. Fischer carbene complexes in organic synthesis: metal-assisted and metal-templated reactions. Chem. Rev. 109, 3227–3274 (2009).
Trnka, T. M. & Grubbs, R. H. The development of L2X2Ru=CHR olefin metathesis catalysts: an organometallic success story. Acc. Chem. Res. 34, 18–29 (2001).
Smith, C. A. et al. N‑heterocyclic carbenes in materials chemistry. Chem. Rev. 119, 4986–5056 (2019).
Power, P. P. Main-group elements as transition metals. Nature 463, 171–177 (2010).
Martin, D., Soleilhavoup, M. & Bertrand, G. Stable singlet carbenes as mimics for transition metal centers. Chem. Sci. 2, 389–399 (2011).
Légare, M.-A., Pranckevicius, C. & Braunschweig, H. Metallomimetic chemistry of boron. Chem. Rev. 119, 8231–8261 (2019).
Wang, Y. & Robinson, G. H. N-heterocyclic carbene—main-group chemistry: a rapidly evolving field. Inorg. Chem. 53, 11815–11832 (2014).
Nesterov, V. et al. NHCs in main group chemistry. Chem. Rev. 118, 9678–9842 (2018).
Dewhurst, R. D., Légaré, M.-A. & Braunschweig, H. Towards the catalytic activation of inert small molecules by main-group ambiphiles. Commun. Chem. 3, 131 (2020).
Stephan, D. W. & Erker, G. Frustrated Lewis pair chemistry: development and perspectives. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 6400–6441 (2015).
Soleilhavoup, M. & Bertrand, G. Borylenes: an emerging class of compounds. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 10282–10292 (2017).
Légaré, M.-A. et al. Nitrogen fixation and reduction at boron. Science 359, 896–900 (2018).
Légaré, M.-A. et al. The reductive coupling of dinitrogen. Science 363, 1329–1332 (2019).
Légaré, M.-A. et al. One-pot, room-temperature conversion of dinitrogen to ammonia at a main-group element. Nat. Chem. 12, 1076–1080 (2020).
Dahcheh, F., Martin, D., Stephan, D. W. & Bertrand, G. Synthesis and reactivity of a CAAC–aminoborylene adduct: a hetero-allene or an organoboron isoelectronic with singlet carbenes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 13159–13163 (2014).
Braunschweig, H. et al. Multiple complexation of CO and related ligands to a main-group element. Nature 522, 327–330 (2015).
Braunschweig, H. et al. Main-group metallomimetics: transition metal-like photolytic CO substitution at boron. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 1802–1805 (2017).
Pranckevicius, C. et al. Phosphinoborylenes as stable sources of fleeting borylenes. Chem. Sci. 11, 11055–11059 (2020).
Rang, M. et al. Reduction and rearrangement of a Boron(I) carbonyl complex. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 2963–2968 (2020).
Stoy, A. et al. Evidence for borylene carbonyl (LHB=C=O) and base-stabilized (LHB=O) and base-free oxoborane (RB≡O) intermediates in the reactions of diborenes with CO2. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 3376–3380 (2022).
Hieber, W. & Leutert, F. Zur Kenntnis des koordinativ gebundenen Kohlenoxyds: Bildung von Eisencarbonylwasserstoff. Naturwissenschaften 18, 360–361 (1931).
Conder, H. L. & Darensbourg, M. Y. Alkylation and substitution reactions of metal carbonyl acylate and carbene complexes. Inorg. Chem. 13, 506–511 (1974).
Semmelhack, M. F. & Tamura, R. Control over site of alkylation in iron acylate complexes: general preparation and reactions of alkylidene-iron tetracarbonyl complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 105, 4099–4100 (1983).
Sierra, M. A., Merinero, A. D., Giner, E. A., Gómez-Gallego, M. & Ramírez de Arellano, C. An entry to mixed NHC–Fischer carbene complexes and zwitterionic group 6 metal alkenyls. Chem. Eur. J. 22, 13521–13531 (2016).
Scharnagl, F. K., Bose, S. K. & Marder, T. B. Acylboranes: synthetic strategies and applications. Org. Biomol. Chem. 15, 1738–1752 (2017).
Šterman, A., Sosič, I., Gobec, S. & Časar, Z. Recent advances in the synthesis of acylboranes and their widening applicability. ACS Omega 5, 17868–17875 (2020).
Sheldrick, G. SHELXT—integrated space-group and crystal-structure determination. Acta Cryst. A71, 3–8 (2015).
Sheldrick, G. Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL. Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122 (2008).
Vosko, S. H., Wilk, L. & Nusair, M. Accurate spin-dependent electron liquid correlation energies for local spin density calculations: a critical analysis. Can. J. Phys. 58, 1200–1211 (1980).
Lee, C., Yang, W. & Parr, R. G. Development of the Colle-Salvetti correlation-energy formula into a functional of the electron density. Phys. Rev. B 37, 785–789 (1988).
Becke, A. D. Density‐functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange. J. Chem. Phys. 98, 5648–5652 (1993).
Stephens, P. J., Devlin, F. J., Chabalowski, C. F. & Frisch, M. J. Ab initio calculation of vibrational absorption and circular dichroism spectra using density functional force fields. J. Phys. Chem. 98, 11623–11627 (1994).
Grimme, S., Antony, J., Ehrlich, S. & Krieg, H. A. A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu. J. Chem. Phys. 132, 154104 (2010).
Weigend, F. & Ahlrichs, R. Balanced basis sets of split valence, triple zeta valence and quadruple zeta valence quality for H to Rn: Design and assessment of accuracy. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 7, 3297 (2005).
Tian, L. & Feiwu, C. Atomic dipole moment corrected Hirshfeld population method. J. Theor. Comput. Chem. 11, 163–183 (2012).
Wiberg, K. B. et al. Determining atom-centered monopoles from molecular electrostatic potentials. The need for high sampling density in formamide conformational analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 11, 361–373 (1990).
Frisch, M. J. et al. Gaussian 16, Revision C.01. (Gaussian, Inc., 2016).
Lu, T. et al. Multiwfn: a multifunctional wavefunction analyzer. J. Comput. Chem. 33, 580–592 (2012).
Acknowledgements
Financial support from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (grant numbers BR1149/22-1 and 466754611) is gratefully acknowledged. We thank Dr. Thomas Kupfer and Prof. Anthony F. Hill for helpful discussions.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Experiments were designed by M.H., A.M., and H.B. and performed by M.H. and A.M. The article was written by M.H. and R.D.D. X-ray crystallography was performed by M.H., A.M., and A.S. The project was overseen by H.B. All authors read and commented on the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks Miguel Sierra and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Härterich, M., Matler, A., Dewhurst, R.D. et al. A step-for-step main-group replica of the Fischer carbene synthesis at a borylene carbonyl. Nat Commun 14, 2764 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-36251-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-36251-3
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.