Single cell profiling of primary and paired metastatic lymph node tumors in breast cancer patients

Liu, Tong; Liu, Cheng; Yan, Meisi; Zhang, Lei; Zhang, Jing; Xiao, Min; Li, Zhigao; Wei, Xiaofan; Zhang, Hongquan

doi:10.1038/s41467-022-34581-2

Download PDF

Article
Open access
Published: 10 November 2022

Single cell profiling of primary and paired metastatic lymph node tumors in breast cancer patients

Tong Liu¹^na1,
Cheng Liu^2,3,4^na1,
Meisi Yan⁵^na1,
Lei Zhang^2,3,4,
Jing Zhang^2,3,4,
Min Xiao¹,
Zhigao Li ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-4169-143X¹,
Xiaofan Wei ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-2151-9322^2,3,4 &
…
Hongquan Zhang ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-8193-0899^2,3,4,6

Nature Communications volume 13, Article number: 6823 (2022) Cite this article

14k Accesses
17 Citations
Metrics details

Subjects

Abstract

The microenvironment of lymph node metastasized tumors (LNMT) determines tumor progression and response to therapy, but a systematic study of LNMT is lacking. Here, we generate single-cell maps of primary tumors (PTs) and paired LNMTs in 8 breast cancer patients. We demonstrate that the activation, cytotoxicity, and proliferation of T cells are suppressed in LNMT compared with PT. CD4⁺CXCL13⁺ T cells in LNMT are more likely to differentiate into an exhausted state. Interestingly, LAMP3⁺ dendritic cells in LNMT display lower T cell priming and activating ability than in PT. Additionally, we identify a subtype of PLA2G2A⁺ cancer-associated fibroblasts enriched in HER2⁺ breast cancer patients that promotes immune infiltration. We also show that the antigen-presentation pathway is downregulated in malignant cells of the metastatic lymph node. Altogether, we characterize the microenvironment of LNMT and PT, which may shed light on the individualized therapeutic strategies for breast cancer patients with lymph node metastasis.

Clinical and immunological relevance of SLAMF6 expression in the tumor microenvironment of breast cancer and melanoma

Article Open access 29 January 2024

Spatial immunophenotypes predict response to anti-PD1 treatment and capture distinct paths of T cell evasion in triple negative breast cancer

Article Open access 27 September 2021

A comprehensive single-cell map of T cell exhaustion-associated immune environments in human breast cancer

Article Open access 06 January 2023

Introduction

Metastasis is the most prominent cause of cancer morbidity and mortality. Due to the special structure of lymph node (LN) vessels in tumors, tumor cells tend to metastasize to LN tissue, and tumor cell metastasis to LNs is an early manifestation of metastatic tumors¹. The microenvironment of lymph node metastasized tumors (LNMTs) is considered to be immunosuppressive; however, the characteristics and specific mechanisms of various immune cells are not clear. There is an apparent need for the therapeutic targeting of LNMT, rather than of the PT, to secure proper antitumor T-cell generation and timely tumor infiltration^{2, 3}. Studies have found that metastatic LNs can affect the immune response of tumors. For example, targeting metastatic LNs can significantly enhance the therapeutic effect on PTs⁴, which may represent an important strategy for improving patient survival. Therefore, it is important to characterize and differentiate between the LNMT and PT microenvironments.

Genomic and transcriptomics technologies can help us to understand the changes of tumor cells during metastasis to distant organs⁵. In recent years, the emergence of and advances in single-cell sequencing technology have provided a new and precise approach for understanding the complexity of genetic heterogeneity in tumor evolution and tumor cell metastatic progression⁶. Tumor cells in a state of partial epithelial–mesenchymal transition located in the periphery of the original tumor are more likely to metastasize than are the cells inside the tumor⁷. It is well known that tumors form as a consequence of interactions between malignant cells and the microenvironment⁸.

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women worldwide and has a high mortality rate⁹. The molecular characteristics of breast cancer vary considerably among the different subtypes, and specific therapeutic approaches are required for each classification¹⁰. Therefore, understanding the composition of different types of breast cancer has great clinical value. Thus far, several studies have used single-cell sequencing to investigate breast cancer. For instance, one study explored the mechanism of treatment resistance of malignant cells in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) by using single-cell copy number variation (CNV) sequencing technology¹¹, while another study on TNBC characterized tumor-infiltrating immune cells¹². Research involving single-cell analysis of breast cancer has mainly centered on immune cells or tumor cells, but there is currently a lack of systematic research on the interactions among various cell types, and the relevant published articles have primarily focused on TNBC^{11, 13, 14}. It has further been shown that luminal and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)⁺ patients have a higher risk of LN metastasis than patients with TNBC¹⁵. Therefore, we chose to direct the focus of our study on non–basal-like breast cancer.

In this work, we aim to investigate the regulatory mechanism of the tumor microenvironment (TME) that may contribute to malignant cell metastasis and the colonization of LNs, with a particular focus on uncovering the differences between the PT and LNMT in non-TNBC patients using single-cell RNA sequencing. Our analyses reveal that the microenvironment of metastatic LNs is more conducive to tumor cell survival than is that of tumors in situ due to the lower immune cell activity of metastatic LNs. Moreover, we identify a type of cancer-associated fibroblast (CAF) expressing PLA2G2A that can interact with immune cells and that is enriched in HER2⁺ breast cancer. Our data provide insights into the mechanism of LNMT and immune infiltration in tumors and may be a valuable reference for the clinical application of immunotherapy for breast cancer metastasis.

Results

The microenvironmental landscape of PT and LNMT in breast cancer

To characterize the TME of the PT and LNMT in patients with breast cancer, we collected paired tissues of LNMT and PT from 8 treatment-naïve patients with breast cancer subtypes including luminal A, luminal B, and HER2⁺. These tissues were separated into single cells, and we obtained a total of 118,845 cells sequenced by using 10x Genomics 5′ mRNA and T cell receptor (TCR) sequencing methods (Fig. 1a). Hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining showed the gross appearance of metastatic LNs, indicating a high frequency of LNMT among the enrolled patients (Supplementary Fig. 1a). We used BBKNN integration to integrate cells from different patients¹⁶ (Supplementary Fig. 1b). All of the cells could be divided into the following 9 major types according to their canonical markers: B cells (CD3D, CD79A), CD4 T cells (CD3D, CD4), CD8 T cells (CD3D, CD8A), NK cells (GNLY), myeloid cells (LYZ), epithelial cells (EPCAM and KRT19), CAFs (PDGFRA), perivascular-like (PVL) cells (RGS5), and TECs; (PLVAP; Supplementary Fig. 1c–e). We found that the cell types in PT varied largely across the patients, but those in LNMT were similar (Supplementary Fig. 1f). Then, we further clustered and annotated the cells into 40 different cell clusters according to their specific marker genes (Fig. 1b, Supplementary data 1). To investigate the enrichment of cell types in PT and LNMT, we calculated the percentage of the tissues within each cluster. The data showed that B cells and CD4 T cells, which are well-known cellular components of normal LNs, are enriched in the microenvironment of LNMT. In contrast, epithelial cells, CD8 T cells, CAFs, and mast cells were abundant in PT (Fig. 1c, d). The difference in cell types between PT and LNMT was also shown in the UMAP embedding plot which was colored according to tissue type (Fig. 1e). To further prove that the cells we collected were intratumoral, we randomly picked LN tissues of 4 patients from the 8 patients in the present study to perform spatial transcriptomics. The results showed that the ratio of tumor cells was over 50% in all 4 patients and over 75% in 3 of them, suggesting that the samples were from LN metastases (Fig. 1f, Supplementary Fig. 1g). These data indicated that the cell types of the metastatic microenvironment of LNs differed significantly from those of PTs.

**Fig. 1: Microenvironmental landscape of PT and LNMT in breast cancer.**

Suppressed T cell activity in LNMTs

LNs are central to immune cell circulation and maturation. To determine why malignant cells can survive in LNs without being eliminated by the immune cells, we analyzed the features of immune cells both in PTs and LNMTs. We annotated T cells and NK cells into 15 clusters, including 5 CD8 T cell subsets, 7 CD4 T cell subsets, γδ T cells, and 2 NK cell subsets (Fig. 2a, Supplementary Fig. a & b). The data showed that T cells and NK cells from the 2 tissues were distributed differently and exhibited disparate transcription programs (Fig. 2a). We found that these 2 types of NK cells expressed tumor-suppressing genes (XCL1 and XCL2¹⁷ for NK-C1-XCL1, cytotoxic genes for NK-C2-GZMH) in higher proportions in PTs than in LNMTs (Supplementary Fig. 2c).

**Fig. 2: T cell activity suppression in LNMT.**

To track the development trajectories of CD8 T cells, we employed a diffusion embedding map to visualize CD8 T subsets and found continuous developmental progression (Fig. 2b). CD8-C1-CD8B was present at the initial stage of CD8 T cells differentiation, in which there was also a high expression of CCR7 and SELL (Fig. 2b, Supplementary Fig. 2c), which are the markers of naïve T cells (T_N). CD8-C2-CCL5, characterized by higher expression of cytotoxic markers and high expression of HOPX (Supplementary Fig. 2b, d), was present in the next stage after CD8-C1-CD8B. CCL5⁺ T cells further branched into CD8-C3-GZMK or CD8-C4-HSPA1A (Fig. 2b). CD8-C3-GZMK cells were defined as effect memory T cells (T_EM) due to their expression of cytotoxic markers like NKG7, GZMA, and GZMK; meanwhile, CD8-C4-HSP1A1, which expressed cytotoxic markers and a high level of CD69 but a low level of ITGAE, represented CD69⁺ITGAE^- tissue-resident memory T cells (T_RM) (Fig. 2b, Supplementary Fig. 2b). CD8-C5-CXCL13, which differentiated from CD8-C3-GZMK, was considered to be the terminal state of differentiation (Fig. 2b). CD8-C5-CXCL13 expressed cytotoxic markers and exhausted makers including CTLA4, PDCD1, and LAG3 (Supplementary Fig. 2b, e), and was characterized as exhausted or pre-exhausted CD8 T cells. We then performed principal component analysis (PCA) to investigate CD8 T cells in the microenvironment of LNMTs and PTs. Principal component (PC) 2 was the most prominent component distinguishing CD8 T cells between PT and LNMT of the first 20 PCs (Supplementary Fig. 2f). We used a PCA embedding map colored according to tissue type to determine the distribution of CD8 T cells (Fig. 2c). The most variant genes contributing to PC2 were CCL5, CCL4, chemokines involved in T cell recruitment, MHC class II genes functioning in antigen presentation, and cytokines such as GZMA and GZMH, which are known for their cytotoxic function in T cells (Supplementary Fig. 2g). The CD8 T cell activation signature also showed CD8 T cells in PTs to have a higher activation score than those in LNMTs (Fig. 2d), supporting the previous findings.

Next, we analyzed the characteristics of CD4 T cells. Single-cell sequencing has recently been used to identify the tumor-suppressing functions of CD4 T cells, for example, the function of GZMK⁺CD4⁺ T cells in bladder cancer¹⁸. It has been found that CD4 T cells are more complex than initially believed and need to be further explored. In our study, CD4 T cells were classified into 7 clusters according to their specific gene expressions (Fig. 2a, Supplementary Fig. 2b). According to their markers, CD4-C1-RPL corresponded to naïve CD4 cells, while CD4-C2-ANXA1 and CD4-C3-YPEL5 corresponded to memory or pre-memory CD4 cells. These 3 clusters were enriched in LNMTs (Fig. 2a, Supplementary Fig. 2c). CD4-C6-CXCL13 highly expressed CXCL13, which is reported to attract B cells¹⁹, and corresponded to T_fh or T_fh-like cells. Interestingly, we found notable heterogeneity among CD4⁺CXCL13⁺ T cells across the 2 microenvironments (Fig. 2e, f). To study the heterogeneity of CD4⁺CXCL13⁺ cells, we re-clustered CD4⁺CXCL13⁺ T cells and found 5 clusters of CD4⁺CXCL13⁺ T cells as identified by their typical markers (Fig. 2g–i). We found that the percentage of cluster 2 in PTs was much higher than that in LNMTs (Fig. 2j). Cluster 2 expressed a higher level of interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) than did the other CD4⁺CXCL13⁺ clusters, indicating that this type of CD4 T cells has a potential role in killing tumor cells (Fig. 2i). Intriguingly, we found that BHLHE40 was highly expressed in cluster 2 (Fig. 2i), which is consistent with a previous study that reported BHLHE40⁺CD4⁺ T cells to have the ability to suppress colon cancer cells²⁰, supporting the speculation of the tumor-suppressing function of cluster 2, which need further functional validation. In contrast, LNMTs showed more cluster 1 cells with a high expression of GPR183, which is reportedly expressed in naive CD4 and CD8 T cells²¹ (Fig. 2i). Using a diffusion map to infer the CD4⁺CXCL13⁺ T cell trajectory, we found that the initial development stage of cluster 1 could differentiate into 3 branches: cluster 2, cluster 3, and cluster 4 (Fig. 2g). We found that cluster 1 in LNMT mainly differentiated into exhausted cluster 3, whereas in PT, it mainly differentiated into tumor-suppressing cluster 2 (Fig. 2k). Differential gene analysis between cluster 2 and cluster 3 confirmed that cluster 2 expressed high tumor-suppressing genes (e.g., GZMA) in tumor (Fig. 2l). The ratio of cluster 3 to cluster 2 could also be used to predict poor prognosis in TCGA-BRCA datasets (Fig. 2m). This finding suggested that CD4 T cells in LNMTs are less mature than those in PTs and CD4⁺CXCL13⁺ T cells and are more likely to be reprogrammed into an exhausted state in LNMTs. Altogether, these data demonstrated that the antitumor cytotoxicity of T cells in LNMTs was reduced compared to that in PTs.

T cells in PTs showed higher expansion and transition ability than did those in LNMTs

T clonal expansion and transition are manifestations of immune response and immune activation. Consequently, we analyzed T clonal expansion and transition in CD4 and CD8 T cells with single-cell resolution TCR sequencing. 59,327 immune T cells were captured and 47,803 of them were performed TCR analysis. We found that patient 2 and patient 4 had very rare immune cells, which were removed from the downstream analysis (Supplementary Fig. 3a). Of all the T cells, approximately 18.4% showed clonal expansion (5.01% with 2 cells per clone, and 13.39% with 3 cells per clone; Supplementary Fig. 3b). We found that the proportion of T cells in the PTs with clonal expansion was higher than that in LNMTs (Fig. 3a). We then employed STARTRAC, a method based on Shannon entropy, to quantify the expansion and transition ability of T cell clusters²⁰. The transition and expansion ability of CD8 T cells was more powerful than that of CD4 T cells (Supplementary Fig. 3c, d). We found that CD4 T cells in PTs, such as CD4-C3-YPEL5, had stronger transition ability than did those in LNMTs (Fig. 3b). Then, we used STARTRAC-expansion to measure the expansion of each T cell cluster. CD4-C6-CXCL13 had the greatest expansion ability among CD4 T cells, followed by CD4-C5-FOXP3 (Supplementary Fig. 3c). these both clusters showed a greater expansion ability in PTs than in LNMTs (Fig. 3c). CD8-C2-CCL5 and CD8-C3-GZMK demonstrated a significantly more powerful expansion ability in PTs than in LNMTs (Fig. 3c). To investigate the relationship between T cell expansion and T cell activation based on TCR sequencing analysis, we fitted the line of CD4 regulatory T cells (Tregs) score and CD8 activation score with cell expansion in each cluster in different tissues separately to determine the correlation between T cell activation and TCR expansion. T cells showed a weaker expansion ability in LNMTs than in PTs, even when at a similar developmental stage (Fig. 3d, e). Overall, TCR sequencing analysis of CD4 and CD8 T cells further proved that T cells displayed a lower activity of expansion and transition in LNMTs than in PTs.

**Fig. 3: T cells in PT have higher expansion and transition ability than those in LNMT.**

Characteristics of matched T cells in the breast cancer microenvironment

To further demonstrate that T cells are suppressed in LNMTs, we compared the activity of matched T (MT) cells in LNMTs with those in PTs. T cells with identical TCRs located in 2 different tissues were considered to be MT cells, originating from the same progenitor and having a similar development time²² (Fig. 4a). The results showed that the microenvironment of PTs had a higher percentage of MT cells (25%) than did the LNMTs (5.8%) (Fig. 4b). Matched T cells only occupy lower than 25% in total T cells (Fig. 4b) and may transit between diverse states. To avoid missing the differences caused by different states of matched T, we included all matched CD8 T in DEG analysis and separated matched CD4 T cells into conventional CD4 T (Tconvs) and Tregs for differential gene analysis. The results showed that 128 genes were significantly down-regulated and 63 genes were up-regulated in matched CD8 T cells of LNMT compared with PT (Fig. 4c). These significant genes were then thrown into pathway enrichment analysis to uncover the underlying biological functions. We found that the down-regulated genes of expanded CD8 T cells in LNMT were enriched in T cell activation, which also reflects a lower T cell activity in LNMT than in PT (Fig. 4d & Supplementary Fig. 4a).

For CD4 T cells, 460 genes were significantly down-regulated and 21 genes were up-regulated in matched Tconvs of LNMT compared with PT (Fig. 4e). Pathway enrichment analysis revealed that Tconvs in PT are in enriched in the T cell activation pathway and positive regulation of cytokine production (Fig. 4f & Supplementary Fig. 4b). As for Tregs, only 27 genes were down-regulated and 16 genes were up-regulated in the matched Tregs of LNMT compared with PT (Supplementary Fig. 4c). In summary, these data further supported that T cells are less activated in LNMT compared with PT.

Characteristics of myeloid cells in the breast cancer microenvironment

Myeloid cells play an important role in the TME²³. We identified 11 clusters of myeloid cells including 4 dendritic cells (DC) subsets (pDC-LILRA4, DC-C1-CD1C, DC-C2-CLEC9A, and DC-C3-LAMP3), 6 macrophage subsets (Macro-C1-APOC1, Macro-C2-SLC40A1, Macro-C3-VCAN, Macro-C4-CXCL11, Macro-C5-SPP1, and Macro-C6-CCL3) and mast cells (Fig. 5a, Supplementary Fig. 5a). The enriched genes of each cell type are shown in Fig. 5b. DC-C1-CD1C and DC-C2-CLEC9A; the high expression of DC1C/CLEC10A and XCR1/CLEC9A correspond to cDC1 and cDC2, respectively, and have been well-characterized²⁴. DC-C3-LMAP3, which was characterized in several recent studies^{25, 26}, showed a high expression of CCR7, chemokines, and costimulatory genes, and represented activated DCs (Fig. 5b). An embedding plot revealed differences in DCs across the 2 microenvironments (Supplementary Fig. 5b), with pDC-LILRA4, DC-C1-CD1C, and DC-C3-LAMP3 showing a higher preference for LNMTs than for PTs (Fig. 5c). Differential gene analysis showed that DCs in PTs were more enriched in the interferon-stimulated gene (ISG15) and had higher levels of STAT1 expression (Fig. 5d, Supplementary Fig. 5c), a key transcription for DC differentiation and maturation. Moreover, DC-C3-LAMP3 in PTs had a higher MHC II gene expression than that in LNMTs (Fig. 5e, f). DC-C3-LAMP3 in PTs also showed higher enrichment in the glycolysis pathway (Supplementary Fig. 5d), which contributes to DC activation²⁷. Because activated DCs play important roles in communicating with other immune cells, we then undertook to determine whether DC-C3-LAMP3 showed a different type of communication with immune cells depending on whether it was in PTs or LNMTs. LAMP3⁺ DCs highly expressed CXCL9 and CCL19 in PTs and highly expressed CCL17 and CCL22 in LNMTs (Fig. 5g). Cell–cell interaction analysis showed that LAMP3⁺ DCs in PTs exhibited greater interaction with immune cells through CXCL9:CXCR3, CCL19:CXCR3, or CCL19:CCR7 than in LNMTs. However, LAMP3⁺ DCs in LNMTs showed a stronger interaction with Tregs through CCL17:CCR4 and CCL22:CCR4 (Fig. 5h), suggesting that LAMP3⁺ DCs in LNMTs may be more likely to recruit and activate Tregs to enhance immunosuppression. These data suggested that DCs, especially LAMP3⁺ DCs in PTs, were more mature and had a greater T cell priming and activating ability than those in LNMTs.

Subsets with a high expression of CD68 were defined as macrophages. Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) are characterized by enrichment in the TME. We subsequently combined the data of a published study¹² and that of our single-cell analysis to clarify the properties of the tissue-resident macrophage subsets (Supplementary Fig. 5e). Consistent with the previous study, we found that the macrophages in the TME showed a greater degree of diversity and complexity²⁸. Macro-C4-CXCL11 and Macro-C5-SPP1 were significantly highly enriched in the TME and corresponded to TAMs. Macro-C1-APOC1, Macro-C2-SLC40A1, and Macro-C6-CCL3 were defined as tissue-resident macrophages, the levels of which in tumors were comparable to those in adjacent tissues (Fig. 5i). It is well known that M1 and M2 signatures represent the different functions of macrophages in the tumor. In this study, we found there is no difference in the ratio of these 2 types of macrophages in PTs compared to LNMTs (Supplementary Fig. 5f, g). However, using differential gene analysis, we found that macrophages have a higher expression of IFI27, IFITM1, and IFI44L in PTs than in LNMTs (Fig. 5j), suggesting activation of IFN-γ signaling in PTs. Furthermore, CCL8, which has been reported to promote breast metastasis and progression²⁹, was more highly expressed in PTs than in LNMTs, indicating distinct microenvironments in PT and LNMT that could influence tumor cell survival.

PLA2G2A⁺ CAFs in HER2⁺ breast cancer promoted immune infiltration

In our dataset, we identified 3 types of stromal cells: TECs, PVLs, and CAFs³⁰ (Fig. 6a, Supplementary Fig. 6a). PVLs included 2 subtypes, PVL-C1-MGS5 and PVL-C2-MYH11, both of which exhibited a high expression of actin cytoskeleton gene ACTA2 and GTPase-activating protein RGS5 (Supplementary Fig. 6b). CAFs play a pivotal role in the cancer microenvironment and may suppress the immune response and/or promote tumor metastasis³¹. We found there is no difference in the proportion of total CAFs in PTs versus LNMTs (Fig. 1d). According to their differentially coexpressed markers, fibroblasts were further classified into 3 CAF types: myofibroblast-like phenotype (mCAF) including CAF-C1-POSTN; and 2 inflammatory property fibroblasts (iCAF), including CAF-C2-APOD and CAF-C3-PLA2G2A (Fig. 6a). CAF-C1-POSTN expressed high levels of POSTN and collagen genes (COL1A2, COL3A1), which have been reported to contribute to extracellular matrix remodeling and stiffness of tumor (Supplementary Fig. 6b)³². CAF-C3-PLA2G2A, which has been reported in other studies³³, was characterized by a high expression of OGN, which encodes a small leucine-rich proteoglycan protein that functions in T-cell recruitment and immune infiltration in tumors³⁴.

Importantly, we found CAF-C3-PLA2G2A at a high frequency in HER2⁺ tumors, while CAF-C2-APOD was enriched in luminal tumors (Fig. 6b, c). Compared with those in luminal breast cancer, HER2⁺ tumors have a high degree of immune infiltration, and patients with this subtype can benefit from immunotherapy³⁵. We thus aimed to determine whether CAF-C3-PLA2G2A enrichment in HER2⁺ tumors had a connection with immune infiltration. Using cell–cell interaction analysis, we found that, compared with the other 2 types of fibroblasts, CAF-C3-PLA2G2A showed a much stronger interaction with immune cells, including CD4 and CD8 T cells, DCs, and macrophages (Fig. 6d). Mechanistically, PLA2G2A: α4β1 integrin, OGN: HLA-DRB1, VSIR:CCL4L2, FN1:α4β1 integrin, and DPP4:CCL3L1 interaction complexes were found to be responsible for the association of PLA2GA⁺ CAF with immune cells. HLA-DRB1, α4β1 integrin, CCL4L2, and CCL3L1 were reported to be expressed in immune cells^36,37. In our study, we found that CAF-C3-PLA2G2A also exhibited an abundant expression of OGN, VSIR, FN1, and DPP4, which can interact with immune cells. In contrast, the gene expression of OGN, VSIR, FN1, and DPP4 was much lower in CAF-C2-APOD (Fig. 6d, e). To further validate the function of PLA2G2A⁺ CAFs in immune cells, we treated monocyte THP1 cells with PLA2G2A protein and found that PLA2G2A could promote the migration of THP1 cells (Fig. 6f). These data suggested the potential of PLA2GA⁺ CAFs to attract immune cells.

Furthermore, we found that PLA2G2A, which is exclusively expressed in PLA2G2A⁺ CAFs (Supplementary Fig. 6c), was highly expressed in HER2⁺ patients and highly correlated with the immune cell marker CD3E in the TCGA-BRCA dataset (Fig. 6g). PLA2G2A was also positively correlated with the CD45 antigen PTPRC, B-cell marker CD79A, and CD8 T cell marker CD8A in breast cancer patients (Supplementary Fig. 6d). Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining in human breast cancer tissues further revealed that PLA2G2A⁺ CAFs were more abundant in HER2⁺ tumors than in luminal tumors (Fig. 6h, i). Immunofluorescence analysis also showed that PLA2G2A⁺ CAFs had a similar spatial distribution to macrophages and CD8 T cells (Fig. 6j), and confirmed the interactions of PLA2G2A⁺ CAFs with macrophages and CD8 T cells at the single-cell level (Fig. 6k). In short, we identified 3 CAF subsets in breast cancer patients and demonstrated enrichment of PLA2G2A⁺ CAFs in HER2⁺ tumors, and these may be the main microenvironmental factors that determine the immune infiltration in breast cancer.

Antigen-presentation pathway was down-regulated in malignant cells of metastatic lymph node

Finally, we wanted to characterize the features of malignant epithelial cells. Epithelial cells were divided into malignant epithelial cells and nonmalignant epithelial cells according to their CNVs. Malignant cells and nonmalignant cells were separated according to the distribution of epithelial cell malignancy scores (Supplementary Fig. 7a, b). Heatmaps of CNVs exhibited a considerable degree of divergence among the patients, and similar patterns were observed in the same patients, even in different tissues. Malignant cells from the same patient showed a similar CNV pattern, suggesting that the malignant cells were derived from the same point of origin (Fig. 7a, b).

To further understand the characteristics of malignant cells of lymph node metastasis, we compared transcriptome signatures of the malignant cells between LNMT and PT for patients that have at least 20 cells in each tissue. Thus, 3 patients were excluded and the transcriptome signature of the other 5 patients was calculated (Supplementary data 4). Few significant genes are shared across patients (Supplementary Fig. 7c, d). Interestingly, we found antigen presentation genes, such as CD74, HLA-DRA and B2M, are mostly down-regulated in LNMT compared with PT for patient 8 (Fig. 7c). Similarly, we also found that HLA-B and HLA-C are down-regulated in LNMT of patient 5 (Supplementary Fig. 7e). To character whether these findings are prevalent in most patients, transcriptome signatures from the 5 patients were used for GSEA enrichment analysis (Supplementary data 5). Significant pathways shared by the 5 patients were analyzed and the normalized enrichment score (NES) for each pathway was averaged. The pathways were then ranked according to the numbers of shared patients and the mean of NES. From the top 10 enriched pathways, 4 pathways are related to antigen presentation and these pathways are enriched in 4 of 5 patients (Fig. 7d, e, Supplementary data 6).

It is interesting to ask whether the down-regulated antigen presentation pathway is related to CNV clones of malignant cells. Then we clustered malignant cells according to their CNV similarity for each patient and then compared the DEG of each CNV clone in PT vs LNMT (Fig. 7f). We found that malignant cells belonging to different CNV clusters in patient 8 have no difference in metastasis ability (Fig. 7g). And the malignant cells in different CNV clusters of patient 8 are also enriched in the antigen presentation pathway (Supplementary Fig. 7f, g). Antigen presentation genes can be mainly divided into MHC I and MHC II class molecules. We compared the two types of antigen presentation in PT vs LNMT across the different CNV clusters and found that both MHC I and MHC II class molecules are down-regulated in LNMT across different CNV clusters in patient 8 (Fig. 7h). MHC I genes but not MHC II genes are down-regulated in LNMT of Patient 5 (Supplementary Fig. 7h–j). These findings indicate that malignant cells migrated to LNMT may render lower antigen presentation genes, resulting in an immune evasive mechanism, which provide insight into the characterization of malignant cell metastasis in breast cancer.

Discussion

Single-cell sequencing is a powerful tool for analyzing the TME⁶. Several breast cancer studies have used single-cell sequencing^12,38,39,40 to analyze the differences of immune cells among breast cancer in situ, adjacent cancer, blood, and normal LNs. However, an analysis of the metastatic LN microenvironment in breast cancer at the single-cell level has not yet been reported. We thus systematically revealed the characteristics and differences in the microenvironment between LNMTs and paired PTs in breast cancer.

The TME is shaped into an environment with characteristics, such as immunosuppression, that are more conducive to tumor growth. For example, we found that the TME induced the transformation of CXCL11⁺ macrophages with the manifestation of M1-like macrophages into SPP1⁺ macrophages with a higher M2 signature, promoting cancer progression. However, compared with the TME in situ, the microenvironment of lymphatic metastasis exhibited stronger immunosuppression. Lymphatic vessels play an important role in tumor immunity, aiding the antigen presentation of DCs and the activation of T cells in the TME⁴¹. The particularity of lymphatic vessel structure and the high expression of CXCR4 in breast tissue cells may be an important reason for metastasis to and colonization of LNs⁴². Our study investigated this mechanism by performing a single-cell analysis and by characterizing the microenvironment of LNMTs. We found that the overall activity of T cells in metastatic LNs was suppressed more than that in the PTs. This conclusion is supported by several lines of evidence: (1) from the transcriptional level, CD8 T cells showed weaker activity and cytotoxic effect in the LNMT microenvironment compared with those in PTs. Although it is well known that CD8 T cells in PTs have higher activation than those in LNMTs, we identified the phenotype and characteristics of CD8 T cells within the two tissues in detail, such as the subpopulation and development path of CD8 T cells in PT vs LNMT, which can be well characterized in single-cell sequencing. (2) CD4⁺CXCL13⁺ cells were reprogramed to an exhausted state and expressed lower levels of IFNG, CXCL13, and genes that inhibit tumor growth in the LNMT microenvironment. However, the function of the 5 clusters of CD4⁺CXCL13⁺ cells needs to be further verified by experiments. (3) The frequency of CD8⁺CXCL13⁺ was remarkably decreased in LNMT. And (4) compared to those in PTs, MT cells in LNMTs exhibited functional inhibition. Collectively, these findings indicate that immune cells in metastatic LNs are reprogrammed in several ways. Lymphatic vessels express several genes that inhibit T cell activity, such as programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), and may mediate immune tolerance^43,44, a fact which may be the key to explaining our findings. Furthermore, very interestingly, we found that malignant cells migrated to LNMT downregulate their antigen presentation pathway, which results in the defect of presenting tumor-related epitope to adaptive immune cells. Loss of antigen presentation has been studied in various tumors and was the common way for cancer cells to escape from immune surveillance. Taken together, these findings may help us understand why the tumor cells are easy to survive in LN.

Another interesting finding in this study is that activated LAMP3⁺ DCs showed higher enrichment in LNMTs than in PTs and strongly interacted with Tregs through CCL17 or CCL22, and this may partly account for the suppressed activity of T cells in LNMTs. A recent study revealed that LAMP3⁺ DCs in pancreatic adenocarcinoma might promote immune tolerance through interacting with tumor-infiltrating Tregs, supporting our conclusions⁴⁵. Given the higher proportion of naïve state T cells in LNMTs compared to in PTs, we speculate that immunotherapy drugs may have very limited antitumor effects on the microenvironment of LNMTs, and this may have ramifications for the clinical treatment of breast cancer with LNMTs.

Immune infiltration in tumors is currently an area of research focus, and findings in this area may have important clinical application⁴⁶. Immune infiltration is related to different subtypes of breast cancer. Compared with patients of other subtypes, patients with triple-negative and HER2⁺ breast cancer exhibit stronger immune infiltration and can benefit from immunotherapy^{35, 47}. Although clinical and pathological characteristics have been found to be related to immune infiltration, the current understanding of immune cell infiltration is extremely limited, and the mechanisms underlying the varying degrees of immune infiltration in patients with different subtypes are still unclear. CAFs are important components in the TME by their regulation of immune cell activity and promotion of tumor progression and metastasis. In this study, we found a type of PLA2G2A⁺ CAFs that was enriched in HER2⁺ breast cancer and showed high expression levels of genes that can interact with immune cells. PLA2G2A was reported to promote the proliferation of monocytic cells through interacting with αvβ3 and α4β1 integrin⁴⁸. A previous report also found that PLA2G2A is overexpressed in some fibroblast subtypes⁴⁹. We verified in the TCGA-BRCA database that there was a significantly positive correlation between PLA2G2A⁺ CAF markers and immune cell markers. Furthermore, in our single-cell dataset, PLA2G2A⁺ CAFs were observed to interact with various immune cells, especially macrophages, which suggests that PLA2G2A⁺ CAFs may be a factor in tumor immune infiltration, promoting tumorigenesis and tumor development. Another interesting observation is that PLA2G2A⁺ CAFs were present in both the PT and the LNMT of HER2⁺ patients; however, they were not present in the LNMT of patients with luminal breast cancer. Therefore, PLA2G2A⁺ CAFs may be recruited and dominated by HER2⁺ tumor cells to migrate or differentiate in the process of tumor development.

In summary, we demonstrated that the immune cells in LNMTs are less active than those in PTs and clarified the mechanism underlying this difference. Further mechanistic investigations to determine precisely why tumor cells can more easily colonize and proliferate in LNs are thus warranted. Our study identified the unique features of the LNMT and PT microenvironments, the knowledge of which can aid in developing individualized therapy that targets these microenvironments in patients with breast cancer.

Methods

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Harbin Medical University complying with all relevant ethical regulations. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. No compensation was provided for the study participants.

Tissue acquisition

Eight treatment-naïve female patients with a pathological diagnosis of invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast with LNMT were enrolled at Harbin Medical Hospital. Their ages ranged from 47 to 66 years, with the median age being 56 years. PT and paired LNMT tissues were surgically resected from each patient. Among the patients, 5 cases were luminal subtypes and 3 cases were the HER2-overexpressing subtype.

This study was approved by the Research and Ethical Committee of Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital (IRB:KY2019-08). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants in the study.

Cell preparation

PT or paired LNMT tissues were separated and digested into single-cell suspensions. The 10x Genomics Cell Preparation Guide describes best practices and general protocols for washing, counting, and concentrating cells from both abundant (>100,000 total cells) and limited cell suspensions (<100,000 total cells) in preparation for use in 10x Genomics Single Cell Protocols.

Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples passing the RNA quality control were used to prepare for spatial transcriptomic construction and sequencing. The Visium Spatial Gene Expression Slide & Reagent Kit (10x Genomics) was used to construct sequencing libraries according to the Visium Spatial Gene Expression User Guide (CG000239, 10x Genomics).

Library construction and sequencing

The cell suspension was loaded into Chromium microfluidic chips with 5′ v.1.1 chemistry and barcoded with a 10× Chromium Controller (10x Genomics). RNA from the barcoded cells was subsequently reverse-transcribed, and sequencing libraries were constructed with reagents from a Chromium Single Cell 5′ v1.1 Reagent Kit (10x Genomics) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Sequencing was performed with an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 PE150 system, depending on the experiment and following the manufacturer’s instructions.

Spatial transcriptomic sequencing was performed with a NovaSeq PE150 platform according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Illumina) at an average depth of 300 million read-pairs per sample.

Multicolor immunohistochemistry

Fresh tissues obtained from the patients were embedded in paraffin. The paraffin-embedded tissues were cut into 5-um–thick sections on a glass slide. The sections were infiltrated with fresh xylene 3 times for 10 min each time before being soaked in 100% ethanol, 95% ethanol, and 75% ethanol, in that order, once for 5 min. The sections were then soaked in sterile water 3 times, for 1 min each time, to remove the paraffin. The deparaffinized slides were exposed to antigen in a 100 °C water bath with antigen retrieval solution for 20 min. Next, the slides were blocked with 10% goat serum for 10 minutes. After the removal of the blocking solution, the slides were incubated with the first primary antibody at room temperature for 1 h and then with the secondary antibody at room temperature for 10 min. Finally, the slides were incubated with fluorescent staining amplification solution (Absin multicolor immunohistochemistry kit) for 10 min at room temperature. The second and third primary antibodies were stained following the same steps as those for the first antibody, including antigen retrieval, and incubation with primary antibody, secondary antibody, and fluorescent amplification solution. Primary antibodies used for multicolor immunohistochemistry were rabbit anti-human CD8A (Abcam, catalog: ab17147, clone id: C8/144B, 1:200 dilution), rabbit anti-human CD68 (Abcam, catalog: ab213363, clone id: EPR20545, 1:200 dilution), and anti-human PLA2G2A (Invitrogen, catalog: PA-102403, 1:200 dilution).

Single-cell RNA-sequencing data processing

Droplet-based sequencing data were aligned and quantified with the Cell Ranger Software Suite (version 3.1.0, 10x Genomics) using the GRCh38 human reference genome (official Cell Ranger reference, version 3.0.0). To obtain high-quality cells, every sample underwent filtering as follows: (1) cells were filtered if the number of detected genes (log10 scale) was below the medians of all cells minus 3 × the median absolute deviation; (2) cells were filtered if the proportion of mitochondrial genes was higher than the median of all cells plus 3 × the median absolute deviation; and (3) cells were filtered if their unique molecular identifier (UMI) counts were lower than 300.

For spatial transcriptomic sequencing, FASTQ files and histology images were processed by Space Ranger (version spaceranger-1.2.0, 10x Genomics) software with default parameters. The filtered gene-spots matrix and the fiducial-aligned low-resolution image were used for down-streaming data analyses (Seurat).

Doublet detection

To remove doublets in single-cell RNA sequencing data, cell doublets were identified using the Scrublet package⁵⁰. Briefly, for each sample, the cell count matrix was fed to Scrublet. Then, the “scrub_doublets” function was applied to simulate doublets, the doublet scores were calculated, and doublet calling was performed. To further reduce the false-negative rate in the Scrublet analysis, we over clustered the remaining cells and calculated the average doublet score within each cluster. We removed any clusters that had an average doublet score of more than 0.6 or more than 1 known cell marker (i.e., CD3D for T cells and CD79A for B cells).

Estimation and removal of contaminated messenger RNA

We observed ambient messenger RNA (mRNA) effects, which are ubiquitous in droplet-based single-cell RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) experiments. The possible reason for this is that free mRNA released from dying cells and single cells were simultaneously captured by beads in droplets. SCGB2A2 is expressed almost exclusively in the normal breast epithelium and human breast cancer cells; however, in our dataset, we found other cell types. such as immune cells and CAFs, also expressed SCGB2A2. We stained SCGB2A2 and immune cell markers to confirm the absence of these markers. We then used SoupX software to remove or reduce the ambient mRNA effects⁵¹. Briefly, we regrouped all cells (“sc.tl.leiden” function from the scanpy package; resolution = 0.8) to obtain a rough cluster classification. Raw count matrices with defined clusters were fed into the “SoupChannel” and “setClusters” functions. To estimate the contamination fraction of the dataset, we manually defined the 3 gene sets with the strongest ambient effect: immunoglobulin (IG) genes, human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genes, and breast epithelium genes (SCGB2A2 and KRT19). These gene lists were fed into the “estimateNonExpressingCells” function and the “calculateContaminationFraction” function to calculate the contamination fraction for each cell. Finally, the original count matrix was automatically corrected using the “adjustCounts” function, and the adjusted matrix was further used for downstream biological analysis.

Dimension reduction and annotation of single-cell RNA-seq data

To integrate and visualize data, we used the Scanpy python toolkit (version 1.4.1) to analyze our single-cell dataset. Briefly, we performed dimension reduction steps including normalization, logarithmic transformation, highly variable gene calling, data scaling, and PCA calling. To remove the batch effect, data were processed using batch-balanced k-nearest neighbors (BBKNN). BBKNN modifies the neighborhood construction step to produce a graph that is balanced across all batches of the data. This approach treats the neighbor network as the primary representation of the data. For each cell, the BBKNN graph is constructed by finding the k-nearest neighbors for each cell in each user-defined batch independently. As for our data, we implemented BBKNN from the scanpy package by using the “bbknn function”⁵², and the parameters were set as follows: batch_key = “patient”, n_pcs = 35. A batch-corrected neighbor graph was used to find clusters using the Leiden community detection algorithm. To reasonably cluster cells and find their biological markers, the following steps were performed. First, we changed the Leiden resolution parameter from 0.6 to 2 by 0.2 to obtain a collection of cell classifications. Then, we compared the UMAP embedding plot colored by canonical markers (PTPRC, CD3D, CD8A, CD4, CD79A, LYZ, PLVAP, ACTA2, and KRT19) with the UMAP embedding plot colored by the clusters output by different Leiden resolutions to find the smallest suitable Leiden resolution to distinguish canonical markers. Clusters with the same canonical markers were merged. In the first round of clustering, we identified 6 major cell types including immune T and natural killer (NK) cells, epithelial cells, B cells, myeloid cells, CAFs, and tumor endothelial cells (TECs). We observed that immune cell types, including CD4, CD8, and NK cells could not be distinguished well using the Leiden-based classification in the first-round clustering. The reasons for this include the cell types detected by 10x Genomics having limited features and similar transcriptome profiles, and dimension reduction preserving the difference between major cell types but losing some information about major cell types. In the second round of clustering, immune T and NK cells, epithelial cells, myeloid cells, CAFs, and TECs labeled in the first round were further divided into subsets and reclustered into more detailed subclusters. To identify the specific markers of each cluster, differentially expressed genes were identified using the “FindAllMarkers” function of the Seurat R package (v. 3.1.5). Clusters were annotated based on the expression of known marker genes or the most highly expressed genes (Supplementary data 1). The third round of clustering was performed on the annotated clusters in which we were interested, including the group of FOXP3⁺ expressed CD8A⁺ markers that were distinguished when we reanalyzed CD4-C5-FOXP3 and re-clustered CD4-C6-CXCL13 to find heterogeneity and continuous biological states. The second and third rounds of clustering were performed following the same steps as those in the first round, starting from the adjusted count matrix and including normalization, logarithmic transformation, variable gene calling, scaling, PCA calculation, and batch correlation.

Estimating the cellular composition of each sample

To compare the relative preference of each cell type in different classifications (e.g., PT vs. LNMT and HER2⁺ vs. luminal), we made a double table of the number of cells according to the corresponding classification. To reduce the sample size effects, we calculated sample size scaled proportion as follows: number of cells of a specific type in a category/total number of cells in the category. The category-normalized numbers were used to calculate the proportions of categories in a specific cell type.

To calculate the cellular composition in a specific patient, we defined broad cell types (e.g., B, CD4, CD8, DC, macrophage, CAF, and epithelial cell). We calculated the number of cells of a specific type as defined above and divided this number by the total numbers of cells from a specific patient. As the tumor cell suspensions were thoroughly mixed and captured without bias, this ratio reflected the natural cellular composition within the tumor.

Integration of spatial transcriptomic with single-cell RNA-seq with Seurat

The Seurat package was used to perform gene expression normalization, dimensionality reduction, spot clustering, and differential expression analysis. To integrate the data, single-cell RNA-seq transcriptome and spatial transcriptome were preprocessed by the “SCTransform” function and PCA analysis. Then “FindTransferAnchors” and “TransferData” functions were used to measure each cluster score for each spot.

Comparison of myeloid cells in different tissues in other datasets

We downloaded count matrix files (GSE114727)¹² from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database and mapped labels and embeddings from reference data to the new datasets. In brief, raw count matrix data from the new dataset were imported into scanpy and subjected to preprocessing, including filtering, normalization, and logarithmic transformation. We then used the “ingest” function in scanpy to integrate embeddings and annotate the new datasets through projection onto a PCA that was fit our reference data. The mapping labels from the new datasets were output for enrichment analysis.

Estimation of CNV and determination of malignant cells

We inferred the CNV of epithelial cells using transcriptomic profiles, to determine the malignant epithelial cells⁷. CNV was estimated based on 2 major steps: initial CNV (CNV_i) calculation and final CNV (CNV_f) estimation. Genes were first sorted according to their genomic location at each chromosome, and then the CNV_i was derived by applying a sliding window of 100 genes to calculate the average relative expression values within each chromosome. In this way, gene-specific patterns could be eliminated, and the derived profiles (i.e., moving average) largely reflected the CNV. We also restricted the relative expression values to [–3, 3] (values beyond the bounds were replaced with bound values) to avoid any genes with extreme expression influencing the moving average. We defined the CNV score of every single cell as the sum of the square of the CNV_f across all windows. The malignancy score of each single-cell was defined as the mean of the square of the CNV_f minus 1 across all windows. The smooth distribution curve of the malignancy score was fit using bimodal methods to estimate the threshold for malignancy. This function was provided by the “getBimodalThres” function in the scCancer package⁵³. Cells with a malignancy score that exceeded the malignant threshold were determined to be malignant epithelial cells.

Cell–cell interaction analysis

Cell-cell interactions were analyzed using the cellphoneDB python package⁵⁴. To reduce the computational burden and represent different cell types, we downsampled the dataset by randomly sampling 1000 cells of each cell type. The strength of interactions was computed based on the expression of a receptor by 1 cell type and a ligand by another cell type. Only receptors and ligands expressed by more than 30% of the cells in a specific cluster were considered. The cluster labels of all cells were randomly permuted 1000 times to calculate the P value for the likelihood of paired interactions. Only paired interactions with a P value of less than 0.05 were considered. To obtain different paired interactions between different types of CAFs and other cell types, we calculated the differentially expressed genes using the “FindAllMarkers” function. Only genes meeting the criteria of LogFC threshold > 0.5 and min.pct > 0.25 were used to filter paired interactions.

Diffusion map–based pseudotime trajectory inference

We implemented a diffusion map on cell types that had the same lineage, such as CD8 T cells. A diffusion map function was implemented in scanpy packages. The BBKNN batch-corrected expression matrix was used for calculating the neighbor matrix with the following parameters: n_neighbors = 10, n_pcs = 15, and method = “gauss”. The neighbor matrix was then used to calculate the diffusion map. We found that changing the number of neighbors did not impact the relative position of cell types in the diffusion map.

Monocle 2–based pseudotime trajectory inference

We constructed the single-cell trajectory of epithelial tumors by using a reversed graph embedding method implemented in the R Monocle 2 package (v. 2.6.3)⁵⁵. To increase the efficiency of the operation, we randomly selected 500 cells annotated as epithelial cells from each sample; for sample sizes of fewer than 500 cells, all the cells were taken. We integrated the expression matrix of epithelial cells using BBKNN, to neutralize patient-specific effects, including different patients and disease subtypes. After this, cell clusters were determined by a Leiden function with a resolution of 0.8 in batched-removed epithelial cells. We compared each cell cluster with other clusters using the “FindAllMarker” function in the Seurat package to determine the batch-removed differential expressed genes, and the top 20 differential expressed genes per cluster were used to order cells in Monocle to construct the epithelial cell DDRtree trajectory plot⁵⁶. The signature of each state was calculated based on differentially expressed genes over the other states. To compare breast cancer epithelial cells with normal epithelial cells, we first obtained signature genes of normal epithelial developmental states from normal epithelial datasets. Then the average of the signatures was calculated for breast cancer epithelial cells.

T-cell receptor analysis

Alignment and quantification of 10× VDJ sequencing data were performed with the Cell Ranger software using the GRCh38 human VDJ reference genome (official Cell Ranger reference, v. 3.1.0). VDJ sequencing information was extracted from the output file using the Scripy python package (v. 0.3). We used the “chain_pairing” function to summarize TCR compositions. Cells with the same α or β chains were defined as clonotypes. According to their unique α and β chains, TCR chains can be classified into 7 types: single pair, orphan beta, orphan alpha, extra alpha, extra beta, 2 full chains, and multichain. Only the single pair type was used in the downstream analysis. To integrate transcriptome data, we included cells annotated as CD4 or CD8 T cells to visualize our TCR data on embeddings.

We used STARTRAC packages²⁰ to analyze the behavior of T cells. To obtain good quality data, we excluded patient 2 and patient 4, who had low T-cell capture rates, from the downstream analysis. STARTAC-expansion and STARTAC-transition were used to separately analyze T cells in PTs and LNMTs.

STARTRAC-expansion is usually used in the standard TCR clonality measurement but was specifically applied to different T cell clusters in our analyses. Normalized Shannon entropy was used to calculate the evenness of the TCR repertoire of the given T cell cluster and then define the STARTRAC-expansion index as 1-evenness. STARTRAC-expansion ranged from 0 to 1, with 0 representing no clonal expansion for each clonotype and 1 representing a cluster composed of only 1 clonally expanded clonotype. A high STARTRAC-expansion indicated high clonality.

STARTRAC-transition was used to quantify the extent of state transition of each clonotype within a given cluster. The STARTRAC-transition index at the cluster level was defined as the weighted average of all TCR clonotype state transition indices contained in the cluster.

Cell culture

THP-1 (human acute monocytic leukemia cell line, 1101HUM-PUMC000057) was purchased from Cell Resource Center of Peking Union Medical College (Beijing, China). THP-1 was authenticated using short tandem repeat analysis. No mycoplasma contamination was detected. THP-1 cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, penicillin (100 μg/ml) and streptomycin (100 μg/ml). Cell lines were incubated in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO₂ at 37 °C.

Transwell assay

2 × 10⁶ THP1 cells were added into the top chamber of 24-well tissue culture inserts (Costar). PLA2G2A (0.5 μg/ml, 11187-H08H, Sino Biological) was respectively applied to the top chamber, in RPMI-1640, and the bottom chamber, in RPMI-1640 containing 20% serum. After incubation at 37 °C in 5% CO₂ for 4 h, cells in the bottom chamber were collected and counted.

The Cancer Genome Atlas data analysis

The Cancer Genome Atlas Breast Invasive Carcinoma (TCGA-BRCA) datasets were used to analyze the correlations of selected genes with patient survival. Gene expression as well as clinical and survival data were downloaded from UCSC Xena (http://xena.ucsc.edu/). The signature scores of the TCGA-BRCA patients were calculated as the mean expression of genes in the signature. The signature scores were grouped into high and low expression groups by the 55^th and 45^th quantile values, respectively. We used the survival packages to calculate the impact of genes or signatures on patient survival and plotted Kaplan–Meier survival curves using ggsurvplot in R. For correlation analysis, gene or signature scores were calculated by applying Spearman’s correlation coefficient using the cor function in R.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

The raw data and processed data of single-cell RNA-sequencing data and single-cell VDJ-sequencing data have been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database under accession code GSE167036. The raw data and processed data of spatial transcriptomic data generated in this study have been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database under accession code GSE190811. The publicly available single cell dataset used in this study are available from the Gene Expression Omnibus (accession numbers GSE114727¹²). Source data are provided in this paper as a Source data file. The remaining data are available within the Article, Supplementary Information, or Source Data file. Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

Code can be found on GitHub: [https://github.com/bio-liucheng/brca-singlecell] and Zenodo and the corresponding DOI is as follows: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7212881⁵⁷.

References

Duong, T., Koopman, P. & Francois, M. Tumor lymphangiogenesis as a potential therapeutic target. J. Oncol. 2012, 204946 (2012).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
van Pul, K. M., Fransen, M. F., van de Ven, R. & de Gruijl, T. D. Immunotherapy goes local: the central role of lymph nodes in driving tumor infiltration and efficacy. Front. Immunol. 12, 518 (2021).
Google Scholar
Shu, S., Cochran, A. J., Huang, R.-R., Morton, D. L. & Maecker, H. T. Immune responses in the draining lymph nodes against cancer: implications for immunotherapy. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 25, 233–242 (2006).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Aznar, M. A. et al. Intratumoral delivery of immunotherapy—act locally, think globally. J. Immunol. 198, 31–39 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Stratton, M. R., Campbell, P. J. & Futreal, P. A. The cancer genome. Nature 458, 719–724 (2009).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lawson, D. A., Kessenbrock, K., Davis, R. T., Pervolarakis, N. & Werb, Z. Tumour heterogeneity and metastasis at single-cell resolution. Nat Cell Biol.20, 1349–1360 (2018).
Puram, S. V. et al. Single-cell transcriptomic analysis of primary and metastatic tumor ecosystems in head and neck cancer. Cell 171, 1611–1624 e1624 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ungefroren, H. et al. Interaction of tumor cells with the microenvironment. Cell Commun. Signal 9, 1–8 (2011).
DeSantis, C. E. et al. Breast cancer statistics, CA 2019. 69, 438–451 (2019).
Weigelt, B., Geyer, F. C. & Reis-Filho, J. S. Histological types of breast cancer: how special are they. Mol. Oncol. 4, 192–208 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kim, C. et al. Chemoresistance evolution in triple-negative breast cancer delineated by single-cell sequencing. Cell 173, 879–893 e813 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Azizi, E. et al. Single-cell map of diverse immune phenotypes in the breast tumor microenvironment. Cell 174, 1293–1308 e1236 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Qiu, S. et al. A single-cell immune atlas of triple negative breast cancer reveals novel immune cell subsets. Front Immunol. 11, 566968 (2019).
Karaayvaz, M. et al. Unravelling subclonal heterogeneity and aggressive disease states in TNBC through single-cell RNA-seq. Nat. Commun. 9, 3588 (2018).
Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
He, Z.-Y. et al. Breast cancer subtype is associated with axillary lymph node metastasis: a retrospective cohort study. Medicine 94, 48 (2015).
Polanski, K. et al. BBKNN: fast batch alignment of single cell transcriptomes. Bioinformatics 36, 964–965 (2020).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Böttcher, J. P. et al. NK cells stimulate recruitment of cDC1 into the tumor microenvironment promoting cancer immune control. Cell 172, 1022–1037. e1014 (2018).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Oh, D. Y. et al. Intratumoral CD4(+) T Cells Mediate Anti-tumor Cytotoxicity in Human Bladder Cancer. Cell 181, 1612–1625 e1613 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Gu-Trantien, C. et al. CXCL13-producing TFH cells link immune suppression and adaptive memory in human breast cancer. JCI insight 2, 11 (2017).
Zhang, L. et al. Lineage tracking reveals dynamic relationships of T cells in colorectal cancer. Nature 564, 268–272 (2018).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Baptista, A. P. et al. The chemoattractant receptor Ebi2 drives intranodal naive CD4+ T cell peripheralization to promote effective adaptive immunity. Immunity 50, 1188–1201. e1186 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Pauken, K. E. et al. Single-cell analyses identify circulating anti-tumor CD8 T cells and markers for their enrichment. J. Exp. Med. 218, e20200920 (2021).
Engblom, C., Pfirschke, C. & Pittet, M. J. The role of myeloid cells in cancer therapies. Nat. Rev. Cancer 16, 447–462 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Gardner, A. & Ruffell, B. Dendritic cells and cancer immunity. Trends Immunol. 37, 855–865 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhang, Q. et al. Landscape and dynamics of single immune cells in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell 179, 829–845 e820 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Park, J. E. et al. A cell atlas of human thymic development defines T cell repertoire formation. Science 367, eaay3224 (2020).
Wculek, S. K., Khouili, S. C., Priego, E., Heras-Murillo, I. & Sancho, D. Metabolic control of dendritic cell functions: digesting information. Front. Immunol. 10, 775 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Qiu, S. Q. et al. Tumor-associated macrophages in breast cancer: Innocent bystander or important player? Cancer Treat. Rev. 70, 178–189 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kalluri, R. The biology and function of fibroblasts in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 16, 582–598 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Wu, S. Z. et al. Stromal cell diversity associated with immune evasion in human triple-negative breast cancer. EMBO J. 39, e104063 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Liu, T. et al. Cancer-associated fibroblasts: an emerging target of anti-cancer immunotherapy. J. Hematol. Oncol. 12, 86 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Insua-Rodriguez, J. & Oskarsson, T. The extracellular matrix in breast cancer. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 97, 41–55 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Chen, Z. et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing highlights the role of inflammatory cancer-associated fibroblasts in bladder urothelial carcinoma. Nat. Commun. 11, 5077 (2020).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Hu, X. et al. Osteoglycin-induced VEGF inhibition enhances T lymphocytes infiltrating in colorectal cancer. EBioMedicine 34, 35–45 (2018).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Pusztai, L., Karn, T., Safonov, A., Abu-Khalaf, M. M. & Bianchini, G. New strategies in breast cancer: immunotherapy. Clin. Cancer Res 22, 2105–2110 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lin, K.-C. & Castro, A. C. Very late antigen 4 (VLA4) antagonists as anti-inflammatory agents. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2, 453–457 (1998).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Maurer, M. & Von Stebut, E. Macrophage inflammatory protein-1. Int. J. Biochem. cell Biol. 36, 1882–1886 (2004).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Wagner, J. et al. A single-cell atlas of the tumor and immune ecosystem of human breast cancer. Cell 177, 1330–1345 e1318 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Savas, P. et al. Single-cell profiling of breast cancer T cells reveals a tissue-resident memory subset associated with improved prognosis. Nat. Med. 24, 986–993 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Nguyen, Q. H. et al. Profiling human breast epithelial cells using single cell RNA sequencing identifies cell diversity. Nat. Commun. 9, 2028 (2018).
Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
von Andrian, U. H. & Mempel, T. R. Homing and cellular traffic in lymph nodes. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 3, 867–878 (2003).
Mukherjee, D. & Zhao, J. The Role of chemokine receptor CXCR4 in breast cancer metastasis. Am. J. Cancer Res. 3, 46 (2013).
Cohen, J. N. et al. Lymph node-resident lymphatic endothelial cells mediate peripheral tolerance via Aire-independent direct antigen presentation. J. Exp. Med. 207, 681–688 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Tewalt, E. F. et al. Lymphatic endothelial cells induce tolerance via PD-L1 and lack of costimulation leading to high-level PD-1 expression on CD8 T cells. Blood 120, 4772–4782 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Cheng, S. et al. A pan-cancer single-cell transcriptional atlas of tumor infiltrating myeloid cells. Cell 184, 792–809. e723 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Pages, F. et al. Immune infiltration in human tumors: a prognostic factor that should not be ignored. Oncogene 29, 1093–1102 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Steven, A. & Seliger, B. The role of immune escape and immune cell infiltration in breast cancer. Breast Care 13, 16–21 (2018).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Saegusa, J. et al. Pro-inflammatory secretory phospholipase A2 type IIA binds to integrins αvβ3 and α4β1 and induces proliferation of monocytic cells in an integrin-dependent manner. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 26107–26115 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhu, K., Cai, L., Cui, C. & Anastassiou, D. Single-cell analysis reveals the transformation of adipose-derived stromal cells into COL11A1-expressing cancer-associated fibroblasts. PLoS Comput Biol. 17, e1009228 (2020).
Wolock, S. L., Lopez, R. & Klein, A. M. Scrublet: computational identification of cell doublets in single-cell transcriptomic data. Cell Syst. 8, 281–291. e289 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Young, M. D. & Behjati, S. SoupX removes ambient RNA contamination from droplet-based single-cell RNA sequencing data. GigaScience 9, giaa151 (2020).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Wolf, F. A., Angerer, P. & Theis, F. J. SCANPY: large-scale single-cell gene expression data analysis. Genome Biol. 19, 15 (2018).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Guo, W. et al. scCancer: a package for automated processing of single-cell RNA-seq data in cancer. Brief. Bioinform. 22, bbaa127 (2019).
Efremova, M., Vento-Tormo, M., Teichmann, S. A. & Vento-Tormo, R. CellPhoneDB: inferring cell–cell communication from combined expression of multi-subunit ligand–receptor complexes. Nat. Protoc. 15, 1484–1506 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Butler, A., Hoffman, P., Smibert, P., Papalexi, E. & Satija, R. Integrating single-cell transcriptomic data across different conditions, technologies, and species. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 411–420 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Mao, Q., Wang, L., Goodison, S. & Sun, Y. Dimensionality reduction via graph structure learning. Assoc. Comput. Machinery. 10, 765–774 (2015)
bio-liucheng. bio-liucheng/brca-singlecell Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7212881 (2022).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China (2021YFC2501000, H.Z.); National Natural Science Foundation of China (81730071 H.Z., 81972609 H.Z., 82230094 H.Z., 82073240 X.W., 82072903 T.L., 82002811, M.Y.); PKU2020LCXQ007 and PKU2021LCXQ023 to H.Z, and the Beijing Natural Science Foundation (7202080 X.W.). This study was also supported by Clinical Medicine Plus X-Young Scholars Project of Peking University (X.W.). The authors appreciate the academic support from the AME Breast Cancer Collaborative Group.

Author information

These authors contributed equally: Tong Liu, Cheng Liu, Meisi Yan.

Authors and Affiliations

Department of Breast Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China; Heilongjiang Academy of Medical Sciences, Harbin, China
Tong Liu, Min Xiao & Zhigao Li
Program for Cancer and Cell Biology, Department of Human Anatomy, Histology and Embryology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, 100191, China
Cheng Liu, Lei Zhang, Jing Zhang, Xiaofan Wei & Hongquan Zhang
Peking University International Cancer Institute, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, 100191, China
Cheng Liu, Lei Zhang, Jing Zhang, Xiaofan Wei & Hongquan Zhang
MOE Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research and State Key Laboratory of Natural and Biomimetic Drugs, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, 100191, China
Cheng Liu, Lei Zhang, Jing Zhang, Xiaofan Wei & Hongquan Zhang
Department of Pathology, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, 150081, China
Meisi Yan
Department of Human Anatomy, Histology, and Embryology, Shenzhen University School of Medicine, Shenzhen, 518055, China
Hongquan Zhang

Authors

Tong Liu
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Cheng Liu
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Meisi Yan
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Lei Zhang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Jing Zhang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Min Xiao
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Zhigao Li
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Xiaofan Wei
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Hongquan Zhang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

The study was designed by H.Z., X.W., and C.L.; Tissue acquisition was coordinated by T.L and M.Y. Tissue preparation and sequencing were performed and supervised by T.L. and Z.LI.; Bioinformatic analysis was conducted by C.L. and L.Z., and supervised by H.Z. and X.W.; IHC experiments were designed by X.W. and performed by J.Z.; HE staining was performed by M.X. The figures were drafted by C.L with help of the rest of the authors. The manuscript was written by X.W. and C.L., reviewed by H.Z. and Z.LI. The project was supervised by Z.LI., X.W. and H.Z.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zhigao Li, Xiaofan Wei or Hongquan Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Arif Harmanci and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Peer Review File

Description of Additional Supplementary Files

Supplementary Data 1

Supplementary Data 2

Supplementary Data 3

Supplementary Data 4

Supplementary Data 5

Supplementary Data 6

Reporting Summary

Source data

Source Data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, T., Liu, C., Yan, M. et al. Single cell profiling of primary and paired metastatic lymph node tumors in breast cancer patients. Nat Commun 13, 6823 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-34581-2

Download citation

Received: 21 April 2021
Accepted: 31 October 2022
Published: 10 November 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-34581-2

This article is cited by

SRT-Server: powering the analysis of spatial transcriptomic data
- Sheng Yang
- Xiang Zhou
Genome Medicine (2024)

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.