Abstract
Nanoporous membranes based on two dimensional materials are predicted to provide highly selective gas transport in combination with extreme permeance. Here we investigate membranes made from multilayer graphdiyne, a graphene-like crystal with a larger unit cell. Despite being nearly a hundred of nanometers thick, the membranes allow fast, Knudsen-type permeation of light gases such as helium and hydrogen whereas heavy noble gases like xenon exhibit strongly suppressed flows. Using isotope and cryogenic temperature measurements, the seemingly conflicting characteristics are explained by a high density of straight-through holes (direct porosity of ∼0.1%), in which heavy atoms are adsorbed on the walls, partially blocking Knudsen flows. Our work offers important insights into intricate transport mechanisms playing a role at nanoscale.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Porous membranes made on the basis of two-dimensional (2D) materials attract intense interest for their potential use in separation technologies1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13. This interest is due to the fact that atomic-scale thickness implies very fast molecular permeation, as compared to conventional 3D membranes that exhibit flow rates scaling inversely proportional to the membrane thickness. To prove this ultimately fast permeance, 2D membranes with relatively large pores having the effective size d0 larger than the kinetic diameter dk of sieved molecules have intensively been explored (for example, see refs. 1,2,3). This regime is well described by the classical Knudsen theory and allows a moderate selectivity that arises from differences in thermal velocities of gases with different molecular weights m1,2. On the other hand, gas selectivity can greatly be improved using membranes with angstrom-scale pores of d0 ≤ dk. In this case, molecules encounter substantial activation barriers for translocation through membranes, which leads to exponentially enhanced selectivity between gases having even marginally different dk4,5. Unfortunately, the presence of activation barriers also implies an exponential suppression of flow rates4,5. This tradeoff between permeability and selectivity is well known6 and motivates the search for novel nanoporous materials with optimal tradeoff characteristics.
To create nanopores in 2D crystals, top-down fabrication is often utilized to introduce nanoscale defects in initially impermeable 2D materials1,2,3,4,5. An alternative approach, perhaps more realistic in terms of applications, is bottom-up synthesis of thin nanoporous membranes such as, e.g., laminates made of 2D materials7,8 and multilayer films of intrinsically porous crystals9,10,11. Such quasi-2D membranes with thicknesses comparable to the mean free path λ of gas molecules may still allow flow rates similar to those achievable using nanoporous strictly-2D crystals12,13. However, mechanisms governing gas permeation and separation by quasi-2D membranes remain poorly understood (especially, experimentally) as, for example, they may differ from simple Knudsen and activated transport models. One of the candidate crystals for envisaged high-performance molecular-sieving membranes is graphdiyne, a carbon allotrope that has intrinsic triangular pores of a few angstroms in size14,15. Its potential use in gas separation technologies has extensively been discussed through theory and simulations16,17,18,19 but the experimental assessment of its gas separation properties is still lacking.
In this work, we have investigated gas transport through graphdiyne-based nanoporous films. Fast and selective gas permeation are found in such quasi-2D membranes. Isotope experiments, cryogenic temperature measurements, and binary mixture experiments reveal that adsorption of heavy gases at the pores’ interior plays a critical role for gas transport at nanoscale.
Results
Membrane fabrication and characterization
Our graphdiyne-based nanoporous films were synthesized via coupling reactions of hexaethynylbenzene molecules20. Details of the synthesis and characterization of the resulting material, using Raman and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, are provided in Supplementary Information and Supplementary Fig. 1. As shown in Fig. 1 and Supplementary Fig. 2, the obtained graphdiyne films have a rather complex morphology and can conceptually be divided into two parts. One is a flat layer of ∼90 nm in thickness, which consists of nanoscale multilayer graphdiyne crystallites aligned in plane. On top of this quasi-2D layer, crystallites grew mostly vertically and self-organized into a scaffold that can be viewed as interconnected nanometer-thick vertical walls or merged microwells of a submicron depth and a similar diameter (Fig. 1a). The scaffold provides sufficient mechanical support for the polycrystalline layer to allow free-standing membranes of several micrometers in diameter, which can withstand pressures up to 1 × 105 Pa (see below). Our extensive examination of the films using both scanning and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) revealed no defects larger than >50 nm in size (e.g., no cracks or tears). However, at the bottom of each microwell we observed small regions with vanishing thickness. These regions are separated by typical distances of ∼100 nm as shown in Fig. 1b. Zooming into such thinnest regions, we estimated their size to be of the order of 10 nm. Unfortunately, the regions were found to be unstable under the electron beam exposure induced by high-magnification TEM imaging, as such we could not conclusively distinguish whether they were intrinsical straight-through holes or electron beam induced graphdiyne defects. Nonetheless, electron diffraction patterns taken near these regions confirmed ABC-stacked graphdiyne with its crystal structure shown in Fig. 1c, in agreement with the previous reports obtained from similar multilayer films21.
Gas permeation performance
To investigate gas transport through the graphdiyne-based films, we suspended them over micrometer-sized apertures etched in silicon-nitride/silicon wafers (insets of Fig. 2a). This was done following fabrication procedures described in ref. 22, with device fabrication procedures detailed in Supplementary Fig. 3. The resulting membranes were placed in between two vacuum-tight chambers, one of which was filled with a gas under investigation while the other chamber was kept under high vacuum and connected to a mass spectrometer. For details of measurement procedures, see Supplementary Information and Supplementary Fig. 4.
First, we studied permeation of various gases at room temperature T. Those included all nonradioactive noble gases (namely, 3He, 4He, Ne, Ar, Kr, and Xe) and hydrogen isotopes D2 and HD. Note H2 was avoided because of a large fluctuating background usually arising in mass spectrometry for this particular isotope, which did not allow sufficient accuracy required for purposes of this report. The chosen gases provided a wide range of m and dk values which allowed detailed characterization of molecular transport through our membranes. Examples of the measured gas flow rates Γ as a function of the applied pressure P are shown in Fig. 2a. As Γ scaled linearly with P, gas transport through the graphdiyne-based films can be characterized by their permeance Γ* = Γ/P. If the same apertures were covered by multilayer graphene (impermeable to gases23) or if a ∼200 nm metal film was evaporated on top of graphdiyne post examination, no helium gas flow could be discerned within our detection accuracy of ∼10−14 mol s−1. This corroborates that graphdiyne membranes were the only pathway for gas transport in our experiments. Furthermore, to calibrate our mass spectrometers with respect to different gases, we used “bare-hole” devices made in the same manner but without placing a graphdiyne film over the apertures. The reference devices exhibited Γ* approximately 1000 times higher than that in the presence of graphdiyne-based membranes. This yields a porosity of ∼0.1% for graphdiyne films (porosity estimation is also detailed in Supplementary and Supplementary Fig. 5). It is a remarkably high value, especially taking into account that the films easily withstood P up to 1 × 105 Pa (higher P were not tested). For comparison, nanometer-thick membranes made from graphene oxide7,8, metal-organic frameworks, covalent-organic frameworks and zeolite9,10,11 exhibited one to two orders of magnitude lower porosity.
Our results for Γ* are summarized in Fig. 2b. For light gases 3He, 4He, D2, HD, and Ne, the observed permeance can accurately be described by the Knudsen behavior Γ* ∝ m−1/2 that is expected for free molecular flows (λ ≫ d0 ≫ dk). In contrast, heavy gases show pronounced deviations from the Knudsen dependence (inset in Fig. 2b). For example, Kr and Xe exhibited ∼2.5 and 4 times lower rates, respectively, than those expected in the case of free molecular flows. This translates into the selectivity S between 4He and Xe of ∼20, well above S ≈ 5 expected for the pure Knudsen flow. It is tempting to attribute the suppression observed for heavy atoms to sieving through the carbon mesh provided by the graphdiyne atomic structure (Fig. 1c), as widely discussed in the theoretical literature16,17,18,19. Indeed, the crystal structure flaunts empty-space openings of nominally ∼5.5 Å in diameter, if using the ball-and-stick model in Fig. 1c, and ∼3.6 Å, according to the density functional calculations24 and Supplementary Fig. 6. Because this mesh size is comparable to dk of the studied gases, one can reasonably argue19,24 that the carbon mesh provides the necessary condition dk ≈ d0 such that noble atoms with large kinetic diameters face a partial steric exclusion. However, this hypothesis contradicts the fact that HD and D2 exhibited little difference in Γ* as compared to the same-mass but smaller dk 3He and 4He, respectively (hydrogen’s dk ≈ 2.9 Å is relatively large, residing in between the kinetic diameters of Ne and Ar). Accordingly, if steric sieving was important, both hydrogen isotopes would show a notable suppression in Γ*, in contrast to the experiment (Fig. 2b). The comparable Γ* between helium and hydrogen isotopes also cannot be explained by the elongated shape of the latter diatomic molecules, because dk corresponds to their smallest cross sections, or in other words, the most favorable orientation for translocation5,25.
Cryogenic temperature measurements for pore size estimation
To gain more information about the conflicting transport characteristics that cannot be explained by either the Knudsen flow or molecular sieving, we have studied temperature dependences of Γ* for helium and hydrogen gases (our setup does not allow low-T measurements for gases with m > 4). Within the accessible T range from 300 K down to 10 K for helium and down to 30 K for hydrogen (the latter condenses at lower T), Γ* was found to vary as ∝ T−1/2 (Fig. 3a). This is the dependence expected for free molecular flow and consistent with the Knudsen behavior exhibited by all the light gases in Fig. 2b. The observation of the Knudsen T dependence allows us to place an upper bound on the pore size d0 in our graphdiyne films. Indeed, the Knudsen flow requires the condition d0 < λ ≈ kBT/(√2πdk2P) to be satisfied over the whole range of T and P under investigation26. Using our lowest T of 10 K and highest applied P of 1 × 105 Pa, we find that d0 should be <5 nm. The validity of this analysis was crosschecked by measuring T dependence for helium flowing through apertures of 30–50 nm in diameter. The relatively large apertures exhibited clear nonlinearities in permeance caused by transition from free molecular flow into the viscous regime, if either P was increased or T decreased (Supplementary Fig. 5). As for the lower bound on d0, we first note that the pores cannot be smaller than the size of the graphdiyne carbon mesh discussed above. In addition, at cryogenic temperatures, permeating atoms and molecules can diffract at atomic- and nano- scale apertures because of a comparable de Broglie wavelength λB = h/(3mkBT)1/2 and aperture dimensions27. For 4He at 10 K, λB reaches ∼4 Å. This value exceeds the kinetic diameters of the studied gases, which are given by the size of electron clouds around nuclei25. If holes in our graphdiyne films were smaller than 1 nm, a contribution of quantum-mechanical diffraction should have been noticeable in the measured T dependences or as an isotope effect for light gases28,29. The purely Knudsen flow observed experimentally implies that d0 should be considerably larger than dk + λB ≈ 7 Å. If we now take a theoretical perspective, our DFT calculations show that noble gases with dk close to d0 should experience very large (∼1 eV) energy barriers (DFT simulations in Supplementary and Supplementary Fig. 7; ref. 5). On the other hand, no sign of activated transport is noticeable in Fig. 3a implying that the barriers are less than a few meV, that is, comparable to or smaller than the thermal energy kBT at cryogenic T. This again suggests pores in our graphdiyne-based films to be larger than at least 1 nm. The above estimate 1 nm < d0 < 5 nm is also consistent with the observed porosity and the described morphology of the graphdiyne films. Indeed, hole-like regions seen in our TEM images (i.e., nano-regions with vanishing thickness shown in Fig. 1b) are separated by a typical distance of ∼100 nm. Therefore, the porosity of ∼0.1% yields openings of ∼3 nm in diameter within each region. Our pore size estimation is also in agreement with that found using gas adsorption experiments30. All the above considerations allow us to conclude unambiguously that the graphdiyne films contain straight-through holes of a few nm in diameter, which are expected to provide Knudsen transport under all our experimental conditions, as indeed observed for light gases.
Permeation of gas mixtures
The inferred microstructure of the graphdiyne films seems to contradict the suppressed permeation observed for heavy noble gases. The clue to solve this final puzzle was found by measuring flow rates for binary mixtures of 4He with the other noble gases (Ne, Ar, Kr, or Xe). The mixtures’ Γ exhibited profoundly nonlinear dependences as a function of the partial pressure of helium (Fig. 3b). For example, if 0.2 × 105 Pa of He was mixed with 0.8 × 105 Pa of Xe, the observed helium flow was more than twice slower than in the case of pure He at 0.2 × 105 Pa. This means that the presence of heavier noble gas atoms suppressed permeation of helium, in stark contrast to the well-known additive behavior for gas mixtures (especially, for inert gases). In other words, if mixed, noble gases no longer flow independently through graphdiyne pores even at room T. To the best of our knowledge, such interaction between flows of noble gases has never been observed before. We attribute this phenomenon to adsorption of heavy atoms on inner walls of straight-through holes in the graphdiyne films. As the holes are only ∼10 times larger in size than typical dk and are expected to have a finite length (at least of several interlayer distances or a few nm), incident noble gas atoms would see the nanopores as partially filled with a heavy gas. This effectively reduces d0 and leads to a suppressed flow of helium. For the case of pure heavy gases like Kr and Xe, this partial filling should also play a role and can be interpreted as either partial blockade of pores by same-gas atoms or their longer translocation times. This explanation agrees well with the progressively weaker interaction effect observed for lighter noble gases (top left inset of Fig. 3b) that are expected to exhibit weaker adsorption due to their smaller dispersion interaction energy compare to that of heavy gases31. The weaking of the interaction effect with decreasing m also suggests that m is the defining parameter. To further demonstrate the importance of adsorption to the interacting flows between inert gases, we measured 4He permeance in the 4He/Ne mixture at elevated temperatures (Supplementary Fig. 8). The suppression of helium flow by the presence of Ne becomes less pronounced, due to the gradually weaker adsorption of Ne at higher T.
To conclude, in comparison with the previously reported atomically-thin membranes with nanopores obtained by top-down fabrication, our quasi-2D membranes exhibit similar selectivities combined with high flow rates thanks to a relatively high pore density (∼1010 cm−2). Supplementary Fig. 9 also suggests our membranes provide a better permeance-selectivity performance beyond the existing trade-off bounds. Unexpectedly, adsorption plays a completely different role in these quasi-2D membranes as compared to 2D membranes such as, e.g., in perforated graphene. Molecules adsorbed on graphene can easily move in-plane32,33, which enhances permeation by many orders of magnitude. In contrast, adsorption of heavy atoms on internal surfaces of the graphdiyne-based membranes reduces permeation. Moreover, the inner-pore adsorption gives rise to a counterintuitive effect of interacting flows of supposedly non-interacting, inert gases. No noticeable gas transport through the intrinsic mesh within graphdiyne’s crystal structure has been evidenced, due to their small effective diameter of <4 Å which yields high energy barriers (Supplementary for DFT simulations) and/or the non-aligned intrinsic meshes from adjacent atomic layers in ABC stacked multi-layer graphdiyne that blocks gas flows. To this end, carbon allotropes with larger unit cells could be better candidates for gas separation, if their mechanical stability can be achieved.
Methods
Membrane synthesis
Graphdiyne-based films were synthesized via cross-coupling reactions of the monomer 1,2,3,4,5,6-hexaethynylbenzene (HEB). In brief, first, HEB was synthesized by adding tetrabutylammonium fluoride to tetrahydrofuran solutions of hexakis[(trimethylsilyl)ethynyl]benzene at 0 °C and used after reaction time of 10 min. Next, HEB was dissolved in pyridine and was added slowly (in 8 h) to a mixture of treated copper foils immersed in pyridine at 110 °C under argon atmosphere, with the ratio of HEB quantity to area of copper foils ∼1 μg/cm2. The mixture was kept at cross-coupling reaction conditions (argon atmosphere; 110 °C) for 64 h and after that, graphdiyne-based films were grown on the surface of copper foils. Note that the entire process should avoid solution/reactant in contact with oxygen (in air) and light. Consequently, the graphdiyne-based membranes were rinsed using heated acetone and N, N-dimethylformamide to remove any residues (e.g., unreacted monomers and oligomer; solvents), and were dried under argon.
Morphology characterization
Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images were obtained using Zeiss Ultra SEM. By tilting the SEM stage at an angle, the interconnected nanometer-thick vertical walls and the microwell structures can be clearly seen (Supplementary Fig. 2a, b). Cross-sectional images of graphdiyne membranes were taken on Zeiss Cross-beam SEM/FIB system. To expose the cross-sections, an area of ∼10 × 2 µm2 trench was removed using focused Ga ion-beam (Supplementary Fig. 2c). Notably, morphology of graphdiyne films near the trench appears bright compare to its original appearance, as a result of re-deposition during ion milling process (Supplementary Fig. 2d). Transmission electron microscope (TEM) images were obtained using either FEI Titan G2 80-200 or Thermo Scientific Talos F200S at 200 keV.
Gas transport device fabrication
Fabrication procedures of our gas transport devices are as follows. First, copper substrate used for graphdiyne synthesis was removed to obtain suspended membrane. Method used is schematically shown in Supplementary Fig. 3. In detail, the graphdiyne/copper foil was spin coated using polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), and then was placed in 0.1 M ammonium persulfate solution (as enchant) for 12 h to remove the copper layer. Subsequently, the PMMA/graphdiyne film floated was transferred to de-ionized water to remove residual enchant. Next, a free-standing silicon nitride membrane with a micrometer-sized aperture in the center was prepared using standard photolithography and reactive ion etching techniques. Subsequently, graphdiyne-based membranes were transferred on top of the silicon nitride membrane using wet transfer methods to cover the aperture there. The PMMA/graphdiyne film was heated at 130 °C for 10 min to provide good contact between the graphdiyne and the substrate. The PMMA was further removed in acetone. Subsequently, the device was rinsed in hexane before blow dry.
Gas permeation measurements
To measure gas permeation through graphdiyne membranes, we use experimental set-up as shown in Supplementary Fig. 4a. In short, the devices were sandwiched between two He leak tight (leak rate < 10−14 mol s−1) chambers. One chamber is filled with gases under investigation (or their binary mixtures for the measurements shown in Fig. 3b) at variable pressures up to 1 bar, while the other chamber is kept at vacuum and is connected to either a mass spectrometer; or a helium leak detector which is sensitive to detect flow rates for gases with molecular mass m = 3, 4.
For measuring gas permeation at cryogenic temperatures, we use a home-made constant flow cooling system as shown in Supplementary Fig. 4b. The cooling chamber was connected to a liquid helium reservoir via a transfer tube. The transfer tube has a concentric geometry and was equipped with a needle valve at the reservoir end of the tube. By pumping out the cooling chamber, the liquid cryogen expands through the needle valve into cold gas that flows in the center layer of the tube towards the sample chamber region. Surrounding the center layer, an outer layer of less cold gas (compare to that in the center layer) flows in reverse direction from the sample region to the exhaust (to a helium recovery line) and acts as a radiation shield. The flow rate of cryogen (and hence cooling rate) was controlled by adjusting the pumping speed of the vacuum using another valve between the pump and the transfer tube. To make holding at a constant temperature easier, a heater was used to provide heating. The temperature was measured using a calibrated thermocouple. When running this cooling setup, the helium leak detector background rose to up to 10−13 mol s−1. This 1–2 orders of magnitude higher background than that measured under ambient conditions was a consequence of He leakage through the fittings of the pipe-work into the atmosphere which was picked up by the sensitive leak detector. This background was however still at least one order of magnitude smaller than our smallest signals and thus has negligible influence to the accuracy of measurements.
Data availability
The source data underlying Figs. 2 and 3 are provided as a Source Data file. All relevant data to support this study are available upon request from the corresponding authors. Source data are provided with this paper.
References
Celebi, K. et al. Ultimate permeation across atomically thin porous graphene. Science 344, 289–292 (2014).
Thiruraman, J. P. et al. Gas flow through atomic-scale apertures. Sci. Adv. 6, eabc7927 (2020).
Zhao, J. et al. Etching gas-sieving nanopores in single-layer graphene with an angstrom precision for high-performance gas mixture separation. Sci. Adv. 5, eaav1851 (2019).
Wang, L. et al. Fundamental transport mechanisms, fabrication and potential applications of nanoporous atomically thin membranes. Nat. Nanotechnol. 12, 509–522 (2017).
Sun, P. Z. et al. Exponentially selective molecular sieving through angstrom pores. Nat. Commun. 12, 7170 (2021).
Park, H. B., Kamcev, J., Robeson, L. M., Elimelech, M. & Freeman, B. D. Maximizing the right stuff: The trade-off between membrane permeability and selectivity. Science 356, eaab0530 (2017).
Li, H. et al. Ultrathin, molecular-sieving graphene oxide membranes for selective hydrogen separation. Science 342, 95–98 (2013).
Shen, J. et al. Subnanometer two-dimensional graphene oxide channels for ultrafast gas sieving. ACS Nano 10, 3398–3409 (2016).
Peng, Y. et al. Metal-organic framework nanosheets as building blocks for molecular sieving membranes. Science 346, 1356–1359 (2014).
Fan, H. et al. Covalent organic framework—covalent organic framework bilayer membranes for highly selective gas separation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 10094–10098 (2018).
Dakhchoune, M. et al. Gas-sieving zeolitic membranes fabricated by condensation of precursor nanosheets. Nat. Mater. 20, 362–369 (2021).
Holt, J. K. et al. Fast mass transport through sub-2-nanometer carbon nanotubes. Science 312, 1034–1037 (2006).
Dakhchoune, M. et al. Rapid gas transport from block-copolymer templated nanoporous carbon films. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 60, 16100–16108 (2021).
Li, Y., Xu, L., Liu, H. & Li, Y. Graphdiyne and graphyne: From theoretical predictions to practical construction. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 2572–2586 (2014).
Gao, X., Liu, H., Wang, D. & Zhang, J. Graphdiyne: Synthesis, properties, and applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 48, 908–936 (2019).
Qiu, H., Xue, M., Shen, C., Zhang, Z. & Guo, W. Graphynes for water desalination and gas separation. Adv. Mater. 31, 1803772 (2019).
Zhang, H. et al. Tunable hydrogen separation in sp−sp2 hybridized carbon membranes: A first-principles prediction. J. Phys. Chem. C 116, 16634–16638 (2012).
Hernández, M. I., Bartolomei, M. & Campos-Martínez, J. Transmission of helium isotopes through graphdiyne pores: Tunneling versus zero point energy effects. J. Phys. Chem. A 119, 10743–10749 (2015).
Bartolomei, M. et al. Graphdiyne Pores: “Ad hoc” openings for helium separation applications. J. Phys. Chem. C 118, 29966–29972 (2014).
Li, G. et al. Architecture of graphdiyne nanoscale films. Chem. Commun. 46, 3256–3258 (2010).
Li, C. et al. Direct imaging and determination of the crystal structure of six-layered graphdiyne. Nano Res. 11, 1714–1721 (2018).
Hu, S. et al. Proton transport through one-atom-thick crystals. Nature 516, 227–230 (2014).
Sun, P. Z. et al. Limits on gas impermeability of graphene. Nature 579, 229–232 (2020).
Jiao, Y. et al. Graphdiyne: A versatile nanomaterial for electronics and hydrogen purification. Chem. Commun. 47, 11843–11845 (2011).
Mehio, N., Dai, S. & Jiang, D. E. Quantum mechanical basis for kinetic diameters of small gaseous molecules. J. Phys. Chem. A 118, 1150–1154 (2014).
Zeng, S. Q., Hunt, A. & Greif, R. Mean free path and apparent thermal conductivity of a gas in a porous medium. J. Heat. Transf. 117, 758–761 (1995).
Cornin, A. D., Schmiedmayer, J. & Pritchard, D. E. Optics and interferometry with atoms and molecules. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 1051–1129 (2009).
Beenakker, J. J. M., Borman, V. D. & Krylov, S. Y. Molecular transport in subnanometer pores: Zero-point energy, reduced dimensionality, and quantum sieving. Chem. Phys. Lett. 232, 379–382 (1995).
Keethi, A. et al. Ballistic molecular transport through two-dimensional channels. Nature 558, 420–424 (2018).
Zhang, S., Liu, H., Huang, C., Cui, G. & Li, Y. Bulk graphdiyne powder applied for highly efficient lithium storage. Chem. Commun. 51, 1834–1837 (2015).
Sams, J. R. Jr. Dispersion energy calculations in physical adsorption. Trans. Faraday Soc. 60, 149–156 (1964).
Yuan, Z., Misra, R. P., Rajan, A. G., Strano, M. S. & Blankschtein, D. Analytical prediction of gas permeation through graphene nanopores of varying sizes: Understanding transitions across multiple transport regimes. ACS Nano 13, 11809–11824 (2019).
Sun, C. et al. Mechanisms of molecular permeation through nanoporous graphene membranes. Langmuir 30, 675–682 (2014).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (21972121, 21790053, 22071251, 21970050, and 21875258), National Key Research and Development Program of China (2019YFA0705400, 2018YFA0703501), FWO-VI (Project Number: G099219N), the BAGEP Award of the Science Academy with funding supplied by Sevinc-Erdal Inonu Foundation, and Fujian Science & Technology Innovation Laboratory for Energy Materials of China. A.B. acknowledges funding from the European Union Horizon 2020 (Marie Sklodowska-Curie IF, EU project 892595 -QCNGas).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
S. Hu initiated and directed the project with helps from A.K.G.; Z.Z., Q.Y., H.W., and Y. Lu fabricated the devices; Z.Z., Y.T., A.B., M.K., C.W., A.M., I.T., and R.B. performed measurements and analyzed the data; Z.Z., Q.Y., Y.Z., G.W., C.Y., H. Liao, and S. Haigh performed membrane characterization; Z.X., H. Liu, and Y. Li are responsible for material synthesis; M.Y. and F.M.P. provided theoretical simulations; S. Hu and A.K.G. wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to discussions.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks Jun Luo and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Source data
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhou, Z., Tan, Y., Yang, Q. et al. Gas permeation through graphdiyne-based nanoporous membranes. Nat Commun 13, 4031 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-31779-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-31779-2
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.