Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Aluminum nitride nanophotonics for beyond-octave soliton microcomb generation and self-referencing


Frequency microcombs, alternative to mode-locked laser and fiber combs, enable miniature rulers of light for applications including precision metrology, molecular fingerprinting and exoplanet discoveries. To enable frequency ruling functions, microcombs must be stabilized by locking their carrier-envelope offset frequency. So far, the microcomb stabilization remains compounded by the elaborate optics external to the chip, thus evading its scaling benefit. To address this challenge, here we demonstrate a nanophotonic chip solution based on aluminum nitride thin films, which simultaneously offer optical Kerr nonlinearity for generating octave soliton combs and quadratic nonlinearity for enabling heterodyne detection of the offset frequency. The agile dispersion control of crystalline aluminum nitride photonics permits high-fidelity generation of solitons with features including 1.5-octave spectral span, dual dispersive waves, and sub-terahertz repetition rates down to 220 gigahertz. These attractive characteristics, aided by on-chip phase-matched aluminum nitride waveguides, allow the full determination of the offset frequency. Our proof-of-principle demonstration represents an important milestone towards fully integrated self-locked microcombs for portable optical atomic clocks and frequency synthesizers.


Optical frequency combs, developed from solid-state or fiber mode-locked lasers, have evolved into photonic chip-based sources that feature the potential towards a miniaturized footprint and reduced cost1. Among various chip-scale schemes2,3,4,5, microresonator Kerr frequency combs (“microcombs” hereafter) are of particular interest because of their high scalability for photonic integration6,7,8. To enable phase-coherent microcombs, substantial efforts have been made towards soliton mode-locking on the one hand9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17, unveiling rich soliton physics on the other hand18,19,20. Specifically, octave-spanning soliton microcombs are important because it permits phase locking of the carrier-envelope offset (CEO) frequency (fceo) via well-known f–2f interferometry21, and are prerequisite for chip-scale implementation of precision metrology22, frequency synthesizers23 and optical clocks24. To date, silicon nitride (Si3N4) nanophotonics has proved viable for octave soliton operations with a terahertz repetition rate (frep)25,26,27. Nevertheless, such a large frep is not amenable for direct photodetection and poses challenges to access the CEO frequency with a value up to frep. In the meantime, the lack of intrinsic quadratic χ(2) nonlinearities in Si3N4 films typically requires an external frequency doubler and off-chip optical circuitry for deriving the CEO frequency28,29. These off-chip optical components compromise the scaling advantage of microcombs and significantly set back self-locked microcombs for portable applications.

Aluminum nitride (AlN) semiconductors exhibit a non-centrosymmetric crystal structure, thereby possessing inherent optical χ(2) nonlinearity as well as Pockels electro-optic and piezoelectric properties30. Apart from the advances in ultraviolet light-emitting diodes31 and quantum emitters32,33, AlN has also proved viable for low-loss nanophotonics in high-efficiency second-harmonic generation (SHG)34,35 and high-fidelity Kerr and Pockels soliton mode-locking15,36. Therefore, it is feasible to establish an on-chip f–2f interferometer provided that an octave AlN soliton microcomb is available. This is a solution that is favored here comparing with the heterogeneous integration approach such as proposal based on hybrid gallium arsenide (GaAs)/Si3N4 waveguides37. Despite that on-chip fceo detection was achieved from supercontinuua driven by a femtosecond laser in non-resonant χ(2) nanophotonic waveguides made from AlN38 or lithium niobate (LN) thin films39,40, resonator microcomb-based f–2f interferometry using nanophotonics, to our knowledge, remains elusive.

In this article, we demonstrate high-fidelity generation of octave soliton microcombs and subsequent fceo detection using AlN-based nanophotoinc chips. Thanks to mature epitaxial growth, AlN thin films with highly uniform thickness are available, thus permiting lithographic control of group velocity dispersion (GVD) for comb spectral extension via dispersive wave (DW) emissions11. Our octave soliton microcombs possess separated dual DWs and moderate frep of 433, 360, and 220 gigahertz, and are found to be reproducible from batch-to-batch fabrications. The results then allow us to capture the f–2f beatnote through on-chip SHG in phase-matched AlN waveguides. Our work establishes the great potential of non-centrosymmetric AlN photonic platforms for achieving portable self-locked microcomb sources in the near future.


Experimental scheme description

Figure 1a illustrates the implementation of microcomb-based f–2f interferometry from a nanophotonic chip. The strategy is to leverage non-centrosymmetric photonic media for co-integration of χ(3) octave soliton microcombs and χ(2) SHG doublers. For a proof-of-principle demonstration, we adopt an auxiliary laser (at faux) to obtain sufficient SHG power (at 2faux) from phase-matched optical waveguides. The use of the auxiliary laser can be eliminated by exploiting microring-based architectures to boost the SHG efficiency34. By subsequently beating faux and 2faux with the fn and f2n comb lines at their corresponding beatnotes of δ1 and δ2, the fceo signal reads:

$${f}_{{{{{{{{\rm{ceo}}}}}}}}}={\delta }_{2}-2{\delta }_{1}$$
Fig. 1: Experimental scheme.

a Illustration of f–2f interferometry using octave-spanning soliton microcombs and second-harmonic generators in a nanophotonic platform harboring both χ(3) and χ(2) susceptibilities. The offset frequency fceo is accessible from the beatnotes of δ1 and δ2, and fp is the pump laser frequency. b Top: sketch of a hexagonal aluminum nitride (AlN) layer (lattice constants: a and c) epitaxially grown on a c-plane sapphire substrate. Bottom: unit cell of an AlN crystal (left) and photograph image of a 2-inch AlN wafer featuring a broad transparency window from ultraviolet (UV), visible (ViS) to infrared (IR) regimes (right). c Spectroscopic ellipsometer mapping of the AlN film thickness in a region of 4 × 9 mm2, showing a minor variation of 1000 ± 5 nm denoted by the right color bar.

The AlN thin films in this work were epitaxially grown on a c-plane sapphire substrate via metal-organic chemical vapour deposition41,42. As illustrated in Fig. 1b, the AlN epilayer exhibits a hexagonal wurtzite structure with a unit cell shown in the bottom, highlighting the non-centrosymmetry. We also show an overall 2-inch AlN-on-sapphire wafer featuring a broadband transparency and a favored film thickness (Fig. 1c)—both are crucial factors to ensure octave GVD control. Great attention was also paid to the film crystal quality and surface roughness for low-loss photonic applications. The AlN nanophotonic chips were manufactured following electron-beam lithography, chlorine-based dry etching, and silicon dioxide (SiO2) coating processes and were subsequently cleaved to expose waveguide facets43. The intrinsic optical quality factors (Qint) of the AlN resonators were characterized to be ~1–3 million depending on the waveguide geometries. The detailed film and device characterization is presented in “Methods” and Supplementary Fig. 1.

Since wurtzite AlN manifests optical anisotropy for vertically or horizontally-polarized light44, we engineer the waveguide structures for optimizing the performance of fundamental transverse magnetic (TM00) modes, which allows the harness of its largest χ(2) susceptibility to ensure high-efficiency SHG. To expand microcomb spectra out of the anomalous GVD restriction, we exploit soliton-induced DW radiations by tailoring the resonator’s integrated dispersion (Dint)11:

$${D}_{{{{{{{{\rm{int}}}}}}}}}=\frac{{D}_{2}}{2!}{\mu }^{2}+\frac{{D}_{3}}{3!}{\mu }^{3}+\mathop{\sum}\limits_{i\ge 4}\frac{{D}_{i}}{i!}{\mu }^{i}$$

where D2, D3, and Di are ith-order GVD parameters, while μ indexes the relative azimuth mode number with respect to the pump (μ = 0). In the dispersion modeling, we have accounted for both the material (AlN) and geometry (cross section, bending radius, and slanted sidewall) dispersion42. To prevent avoided mode crossing from interrupting soliton mode-locking, we adopt a weak pulley-coupling configuration (concentric angle of 6°), which helps suppress the excitation of higher-order resonator modes (Supplementary Fig. 1c).

Octave soliton microcombs

Our GVD engineered AlN resonators are coated with a SiO2 protection layer, making it less susceptible to the ambient compared with the air-cladded Si3N4 counterpart25,26,27,28,29. An example of the resonator modal profile is shown in the inset of Fig. 2a. The top panel of Fig. 2a plots the Dint curve from a 50 μm-radius AlN resonator through numerical simulation (see “Methods”). In spite of the limited anomalous GVD window (solid light blue region), octave microcomb operation is feasible via DW radiations at phase-matching conditions Dint = 0, allowing for spectral extension into normal GVD regimes (solid light orange regions). Note that the occurrence of such dual DWs benefits from the optimal film thickness in our AlN system, while the DW separation is agilely adjustable over one octave through the control of resonator’s dimensions (Supplementary Fig. 2). Around the telecom band, the Dint value (red dots) was characterized by calibrating the resonator’s transmission with a fiber-based Mach-Zehnder interferometer15,17. The experimental result matches well with the simulated one (inset of Fig. 2a) with an extracted D2/2π of ~6.12 MHz.

Fig. 2: Octave soliton microcombs at hundreds of gigahertz repetition rates.

a Top: integrated dispersion (Dint) of a 50 μm-radius (R) AlN resonator (cross section: 1.0 × 2.3 μm2), where the anomalous and normal group velocity dispersion (GVD) regimes are indicated by solid light blue and orange colors in the bottom. Insets: zoom-in view of measured (red dots) and simulated (blue curve) Dint values in the center, and electric field abs(Ez) of the TM00 resonator mode with a normalized color bar in the right. Bottom: soliton microcomb spectra from the experiment (Exp., blue curve) and simulation (Sim., red curve) at an on-chip pump power of ~390 mW. The resonator Qint is 1.6 million and the repetition rate (frep) is estimated to be around 433 GHz. b Soliton microcomb spectrum from a 100 μm-radius AlN resonator (cross section: 1.0 × 3.5 μm2) with a decreased frep of ~220 GHz. The applied pump power is ~1 W at a resonator Qint of 2.5 million.

We then explore soliton mode-locking based on a rapid frequency scan scheme to address the abrupt intracavity thermal variation associated with transitions into soliton states15. The soliton spectrum is recorded using two grating-based optical spectrum analyzers (OSAs, coverage of 350–1750 nm and 1500–3400 nm). The experimental setup is detailed in Supplementary Fig. 4. The bottom panel of Fig. 2a plots the soliton spectrum from a 50 μm-radius AlN resonator, featuring a moderate frep of 433 GHz and an observable spectral span of 1.05–2.4 μm, exceeding one optical octave. Meanwhile, soliton-induced DW radiations occur at both ends of the spectrum, in agreement with the predicted Dint curves. Note that the high-frequency DW exhibits an evident blue shift from the Dint = 0 frequency, which is mainly ascribed to Raman-induced soliton red shifts (relative to the pump frequency)45,46. The soliton recoils make less impact here due to dual DW radiations47. This conclusion is supported by our modeling when comparing the soliton spectra with and without Raman effects (Supplementary Fig. 2b).

The single crystal nature of AlN thin films permits reproducible optical refractive indices in each manufacture run. This, in combination with their uniform film thickness control, leads to a high predictability for the dispersion engineering, making it feasible to predict octave soliton combs at various repetition rates. For instance, our GVD model indicates that octave spectra with repetition rates further decreased by two times are anticipated from 100 μm-radius AlN resonators at optimal widths of 3.3–3.5 μm (Supplementary Fig. 3a). Figure 2b plots the recorded soliton comb spectrum at a resonator width of 3.5 μm, where a frep of ~220 GHz and dual DWs separated by more than one octave are achieved simultaneously. Such a low frep is amenable for direct photodetection with state-of-the-art unitravelling-carrier photodiodes48. We also noticed the occurrence of a weak sharp spectrum around 130 THz, which might arise from modified local GVD due to avoided mode crossing49. In our nanophotonic platform, we could further predict resonator geometries for achieving octave solitons with an electronically detectable frep of ~109 GHz (Supplementary Fig. 3b). Nonetheless, the strong competition between Kerr nonlinearities and stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) must be taken into account since the free spectral range (FSR) of the resonator is already smaller than the \({A}_{1}^{{{{{{{{\rm{TO}}}}}}}}}\) phonon linewidth (~138 GHz) in AlN epilayers42.

Since the SHG from the auxiliary laser (1940–2000 nm) available in our laboratory is beyond the soliton spectral coverage shown in Fig. 2, we further adjust the resonator dimensions for extending microcomb spectra below 1 μm. As plotted in Fig. 3a, the phase-matching condition (Dint = 0) for high-frequency DW radiations below 1 μm is fulfilled by elevating the resonator radius to 60 μm while maintaining its width around 2.3 μm. In the meantime, low-frequency DWs could also be expected and their spectral separation is adjustable by controlling the resonator width. Guided by the tailored Dint curves, we fabricated the AlN resonators and recorded octave soliton spectra at a frep of ~360 GHz (Fig. 3b). Lithographic control of DW radiations (indicated by vertical arrows) is also verified by solely adjusting the resonator width, allowing the spectral extension below 1 μm (width of 2.3 or 2.4 μm). The low- and high-frequency DWs are found to exhibit distinct frequency shifting rates, consistent with the Dint prediction. The observable soliton spectra (from top to bottom of Fig. 3b) cover 1.5, 1.3, and 1.2 optical octaves by normalizing the total span (Δf) to its beginning frequency (f1), that is Δf/f1. Such a definition permits a fair comparison among soliton microcomb generation in distinct pump regimes across different material platforms, suggesting high competitiveness of our AlN microcomb span comparing to state-of-the-art values reported in Si3N4 microresonators26.

Fig. 3: Octave soliton microcombs with agilely tunable spectra.

a Engineered integrated dispersion (Dint) curves of 60 μm-radius (R) AlN resonators at varied widths of 2.3–2.5 μm revealed by the colored shadow regime. b Corresponding soliton microcomb spectra at resonator widths of 2.3, 2.4, and 2.5 μm from the top to bottom panel, respectively. The repetition rate (frep) is ~360 GHz, while the vertical arrows in spectral wings indicate the emergence of DWs. Akin to Fig. 2a, high-frequency DWs here also exhibit an evident blue shift from the Dint = 0 position. From a sech2 fit, the corresponding temporal pulse duration is estimated to be ~23, 22, and 19 fs (from top to bottom), respectively.

On-chip second harmonic generator

We then explore the co-integration of SHG based on the χ(2) susceptibility of AlN for matching the DW peak below 1 μm (middle panel of Fig. 3b). To fulfill the demanding requirement of spectral overlaps with the microcomb, we adopt a straight waveguide configuration, which allows a broader phase-matching condition albeit at the cost of reduced conversion efficiencies comparing to its counterpart using dual-resonant microresonators34,50. Through modeling, we predict an optimal waveguide width of ~1.38 μm for fulfilling the modal-phase-matching condition (Supplementary Fig. 5a), while the actual waveguide width was lithographically stepped from 1.32 to 1.46 μm (spacing of 5 nm) accounting for possible deviations during the manufacturing process.

Figure 4 a shows a section of 6 cm-long SHG waveguides co-fabricated with the microcomb generator. At a fixed fundamental wavelength (1970 nm), we located the phase-matching waveguide at the width of 1.395 μm, close to the predicted width. The corresponding SHG spectra are plotted in Fig. 4b, where we achieve a high off-chip SHG power over 50 μW by boosting the fundamental pump power from a thulium-doped fiber amplifier to compensate the SHG efficiency (Supplementary Fig. 5b). In the meantime, the wavelength-dependent SHG power shown in the inset indicates a large 3-dB phase-matching bandwidth of ~0.8 nm, which, together with an external heater for thermal fine-tuning, is sufficient to cover the target comb lines for subsequent heterodyne beating.

Fig. 4: Second-harmonic generators.

a Colored scanning electron microscope images of fabricated AlN nanophotonic chips composed of octave microcomb generators (microring resonators) and SHG waveguides (total length of 6 cm, not fully shown). The weak pulley-coupled geometry (concentric angle of 6°) in the resonators is not observable due to the large scale bar. b SHG spectra collected from a modal phase-matched waveguide (width of 1.395 μm) at an on-chip pump power of 355 mW. Insets: electric fields (Ey, normalized color bars) of the pump (TM00) and SHG (TM20) modes, as well as wavelength-dependent SHG power (pink dots) with a sinc2-function fit (blue curve). The error bars reflect the SHG power variation from continuous three measurements, and the larger error in the center arises from the temperature fluctuation inside the waveguides, which in turn impacts the phase-matching condition34.

Nanophotonics-based f–2f interferometry

By combining outgoing light from optimal AlN soliton and SHG generators on the calibrated OSAs, we are able to estimate the f–2f beatnote frequency to be approximately 32 GHz limited by the resolution of the OSAs. To electronically access the fceo signal in real time, we employ a scheme sketched in Fig. 5a. The recorded soliton spectrum after suppressing pump light by a fiber Bragg grating (FBG) indicates a high off-chip power close to −40 dBm for the high-frequency DW (Supplementary Fig. 6a). Meanwhile, a wavelength-division multiplexer (WDM) is utilized to separate the f and 2f frequency components before sent into the photodetectors (PDs). Two tunable radio frequency (RF) synthesizers are introduced as the local oscillators (LO1 and LO2) to down convert the photodetector signals for effective capture of the f–2f beat signal at a convenient low-frequency band with an electronic spectrum analyzer (ESA, range of 20 Hz–26.5 GHz).

Fig. 5: f–2f heterodyne measurement.

a Schematic diagram for assessing the fceo. The symbol “×2” indicates a radio frequency doubler. The experimental details are introduced in Supplementary Fig. 6c. b Free-running f–2f beatnotes after the down-conversion process, suggesting a signal-to-noise ratio of 10 dB at a resolution bandwidth of 1 MHz. The local oscillator frequencies fLO1 and fLO2 are chosen to be 11.8 and 9.1 GHz, respectively. Inset: the equivalent curve of \(\overline{{f}_{{{{{{{{\rm{ceo}}}}}}}}}}\) = 2fLO1 + fLO2 – Δf2.

As highlighted in Fig. 5b, we record two down-converted beatnotes of Δf1 and Δf2 with a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of 10 dB at a resolution bandwidth of 1 MHz. A much higher SNR is anticipated by applying a finer detection bandwidth upon locking the telecom pump laser as well as the fceo frequency23,24. The corresponding f–2f beatnote is \(\overline{{f}_{{{{{{{{\rm{ceo}}}}}}}}}}\) = 2fLO1 + fLO2 – Δf2 (inset of Fig. 5b) since the local oscillator frequencies fLO1 and fLO2 are chosen to be larger than beatnotes of δ1 and δ2. Based on the relative frequency positions of the auxiliary laser and its neighboring comb tooth (Supplementary Fig. 6b), we reach an actual fceo = FSR – \(\overline{{f}_{{{{{{{{\rm{ceo}}}}}}}}}}\) due to the involvement of fn and f2n+1 comb lines in the heterodyne beating. On the other hand, the fLO1 and fLO2 frequencies are freely adjustable up to 40 and 20 GHz in our scheme, which could further expand the accessible range of the fceo frequency based on the down-conversion process presented here. Meanwhile, the RF synthesizers are synchronized to a common external frequency reference, suggesting that the captured down-converted f–2f signals are available for further locking the comb teeth in a feedback loop28.


We demonstrate nanophotonics-based implementation of f–2f interferometry by leveraging χ(3) octave solitons and χ(2) SHG co-fabricated from a non-centrosymmetric AlN photonic platform. Thanks to agile GVD engineering offered by epitaxial AlN thin films, our octave soliton microcombs can be reliably produced with dual DWs and sub-THz repetition rates (220–433 GHz) that are accessible with unitravelling-carrier photodiodes. The overall soliton spectral span is adjustable up to 1.5 octaves, on a par with state-of-the-art values (1.4 octaves) reported in Si3N4 microresonators. We further perform the fceo measurement with the aid of an auxiliary laser for enabling SHG in phase-matched AlN waveguides, thus allowing for spectral overlap with the desired octave soliton.

For future development, the spectral restriction of octave solitons for matching with the auxiliary laser wavelength can be relaxed by exploiting high-efficiency SHG in dual-resonant microresonators, which allows direct doubling of a selected comb line in the low frequency DW band51. Meanwhile, the octave-spanning microcomb’s repetition rate can be further reduced by leveraging on-chip Pockels electro-optical frequency division52. By shifting the phase matching condition for SHG, it is also possible to extend octave solitons into the near-visible band, giving access to self-locked near-visible microcombs for precision metrology. Our results represent an important milestone to unlock the potentials of octave microcomb technologies for portable applications.



The surface roughness and crystal quality of our AlN epilayer were respectively characterized by an atomic force microscope and an X-ray diffraction scan, indicating a root-mean-square roughness of 0.2 nm in 1 × 1 μm2 region and an FWHM linewidth of ~46 and 1000 arcsec along [002] and [102] crystal orientations, respectively. The film thickness was mapped by a spectroscopic ellipsometer (J.A. Woollam M-2000), providing a quick and preliminary selection of the desired AlN piece for octave soliton generation with dual DWs. As shown in Supplementary Fig. 1a, in spite of varied film thicknesses across a 2-inch AlN wafer, we can reliably locate the desired region for reproducible octave device fabrication.

To further reduce the propagation loss, the AlN photonic chips were annealed at 1000 °C for 2 h. The resonator Q-factors were probed by sweeping a tunable laser (Santec TSL-710) across the cavity resonances and then fitted by a Lorentzian function. In the 100 μm-radius AlN resonators (width of 3.5 μm), we achieve a recorded Qint of 3.0 million, while the 50 μm-radius resonators (width of 2.3 μm) exhibit a decreased Qint of 1.6 million, indicating the dominant sidewall scattering loss of our current fabrication technology. The related resonance curves are plotted in Supplementary Fig. 1c and d.

Numerical simulation

The Dint of the AlN resonators is investigated using a finite element method (FEM) by simultaneously accounting for the material and geometric chromatic dispersion. The overall Dint value is approximated with a fifth-order polynomial fit applied to the simulated modal angular frequencies: ωμ = ω0 + μD1 + Dint, where D1/(2π) is the resonator’s FSR at the pump mode μ = 0.

The spectral dynamics of octave soliton microcombs is numerically explored based on nonlinear coupled mode equations by incorporating the Raman effect46,53:

$$\frac{\partial }{\partial t}{a}_{\mu }=-\Big(\frac{{\kappa }_{\mu }}{2}+i{{{\Delta }}}_{\mu }^{a}\Big){a}_{\mu }+i{g}_{{{{{{{{\rm{K}}}}}}}}}\mathop{\sum}\limits_{k,l,n}{a}_{k}^{* }{a}_{l}{a}_{n}\delta (l+n-k-\mu )\\ -\,i{g}_{{{{{{{{\rm{R}}}}}}}}}\mathop{\sum}\limits_{k,l}{a}_{l}\left[\right.{{{{{{{{\mathcal{R}}}}}}}}}_{k}\delta (l+k-\mu )+{{{{{{{{\mathcal{R}}}}}}}}}_{k}^{* }\delta (l-k-\mu )\left]\right.+{\xi }_{{{{{{{{\rm{P}}}}}}}}}$$
$$\frac{\partial }{\partial t}{{{{{{{{\mathcal{R}}}}}}}}}_{\mu }=-\Big(\frac{{\gamma }_{{{{{{{{\rm{R}}}}}}}}}}{2}+i{{{\Delta }}}_{\mu }^{{{{{{{{\rm{R}}}}}}}}}\Big){{{{{{{{\mathcal{R}}}}}}}}}_{\mu }-i{g}_{{{{{{{{\rm{R}}}}}}}}}\mathop{\sum}\limits_{k,l}{a}_{k}^{* }{a}_{l}\delta (l-k-\mu )$$

Here a and \({{{{{{{\mathcal{R}}}}}}}}\) are the mode amplitudes of cavity photons and Raman phonons with subscripts k, l, n being the mode indices, while gK and gR represent the nonlinear coupling strength of Kerr and Raman processes, respectively. The driving signal strength is \({\xi }_{{{{{{{{\rm{P}}}}}}}}}=\delta (\mu )\sqrt{\frac{{\kappa }_{{{{{{{{\rm{e}}}}}}}},0}{P}_{{{{{{{{\rm{in}}}}}}}}}}{\hslash {\omega }_{{{{{{{{\rm{p}}}}}}}}}}}\) at an on-chip pump power Pin, κμ (κe,μ) denotes the total (external) cavity decay rate of the μth photon mode, and γR is the Raman phonon decay rate. The detuning from a D1-spaced frequency grid is indicated by \({{{\Delta }}}_{\mu }^{a}\) = ωμ – ωP – μD1 and \({{{\Delta }}}_{\mu }^{{{{{{{{\rm{R}}}}}}}}}\) = ωR – μD1 with ωP and ωR being pump and Raman shift angular frequencies, respectively.

In the simulation, we set the time derivative of Raman items in Eq. (4) to zero to speed up the computation since the decay rate of phonons is much larger than that of photons. We also consider frequency-independent κμ/(2π) ≈ 120 MHz and κe,μ/(2π) ≈ 75 MHz based on measured Q-factors of 50 μm-radius AlN resonators (Supplementary Fig. 1c). Because incident light is TM-polarized, the involved \({A}_{1}^{{{{{{{{\rm{TO}}}}}}}}}\) Raman phonon in AlN exhibits an ωR/(2π) ≈ 18.3 THz with an FWHM of γR/(2π) ≈ 138 GHz41. The gK/2π is calculated to be 0.73 Hz for a given nonlinear refractive index n2 = 2.3 × 10−19 m2/W, while an optimal gR/2π = 0.29 MHz is adopted, resulting in a soliton spectrum matching well with the measured one in Fig. 2a. The simulated high frequency DW also exhibits an evident blue shift comparing with the case of gR/2π = 0 MHz (Supplementary Fig. 2b).

Data availability

The source data that support the findings of this study are available in figshare repository:


  1. 1.

    Fortier, T. & Baumann, E. 20 years of developments in optical frequency comb technology and applications. Commun. Phys. 2, 153 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Waldburger, D. et al. Tightly locked optical frequency comb from a semiconductor disk laser. Opt. Express 27, 1786–1797 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Zhang, M. et al. Broadband electro-optic frequency comb generation in a lithium niobate microring resonator. Nature 568, 373–377 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Gaeta, A. L., Lipson, M. & Kippenberg, T. J. Photonic-chip-based frequency combs. Nat. Photon. 13, 158–169 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Pasquazi, A. et al. Micro-combs: a novel generation of optical sources. Phys. Rep. 729, 1–81 (2018).

    ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Kippenberg, T. J., Gaeta, A. L., Lipson, M. & Gorodetsky, M. L. Dissipative kerr solitons in optical microresonators. Science 361, eaan8083 (2018).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Stern, B., Ji, X., Okawachi, Y., Gaeta, A. L. & Lipson, M. Battery-operated integrated frequency comb generator. Nature 562, 401–405 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Raja, A. S. et al. Electrically pumped photonic integrated soliton microcomb. Nat. Commun. 10, 680 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Herr, T. et al. Temporal solitons in optical microresonators. Nat. Photon. 8, 145–152 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Xue, X. et al. Mode-locked dark pulse kerr combs in normal-dispersion microresonators. Nat. Photon. 9, 594–600 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Brasch, V. et al. Photonic chip-based optical frequency comb using soliton cherenkov radiation. Science 351, 357–360 (2015).

    ADS  MathSciNet  PubMed  MATH  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Yi, X., Yang, Q.-F., Yang, K. Y., Suh, M.-G. & Vahala, K. Soliton frequency comb at microwave rates in a high-q silica microresonator. Optica 2, 1078–1085 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Joshi, C. et al. Thermally controlled comb generation and soliton modelocking in microresonators. Opt. Lett. 41, 2565–2568 (2016).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Yu, M., Okawachi, Y., Griffith, A. G., Lipson, M. & Gaeta, A. L. Mode-locked mid-infrared frequency combs in a silicon microresonator. Optica 3, 854–860 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Gong, Z. et al. High-fidelity cavity soliton generation in crystalline AlN micro-ring resonators. Opt. Lett. 43, 4366–4369 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    He, Y. et al. Self-starting bi-chromatic linbo3 soliton microcomb. Optica 6, 1138–1144 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Gong, Z. et al. Soliton microcomb generation at 2 μm in z-cut lithium niobate microring resonators. Opt. Lett. 44, 3182–3185 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Yang, Q.-F., Yi, X., Yang, K. Y. & Vahala, K. Stokes solitons in optical microcavities. Nat. Phys. 13, 53–57 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Guo, H. et al. Universal dynamics and deterministic switching of dissipative kerr solitons in optical microresonators. Nat. Phys. 13, 94–102 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Cole, D. C., Lamb, E. S., Del’Haye, P., Diddams, S. A. & Papp, S. B. Soliton crystals in kerr resonators. Nat. Photon. 11, 671–676 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Jones, D. J. Carrier-envelope phase control of femtosecond mode-locked lasers and direct optical frequency synthesis. Science 288, 635–639 (2000).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Giunta, M. et al. 20 years and 20 decimal digits: a journey with optical frequency combs. IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 31, 1898–1901 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Spencer, D. T. et al. An optical-frequency synthesizer using integrated photonics. Nature 557, 81–85 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Newman, Z. L. et al. Architecture for the photonic integration of an optical atomic clock. Optica 6, 680–685 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Li, Q. et al. Stably accessing octave-spanning microresonator frequency combs in the soliton regime. Optica 4, 193–203 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Pfeiffer, M. H. P. et al. Octave-spanning dissipative kerr soliton frequency combs in si3n4 microresonators. Optica 4, 684–691 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Yu, S.-P. et al. Tuning kerr-soliton frequency combs to atomic resonances. Phys. Rev. Appl. 11, 044017 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Drake, T. E. et al. Terahertz-rate kerr-microresonator optical clockwork. Phys. Rev. X 9, 031023 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Briles, T. C. et al. Interlocking kerr-microresonator frequency combs for microwave to optical synthesis. Opt. Lett. 43, 2933–2936 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Xiong, C. et al. Aluminum nitride as a new material for chip-scale optomechanics and nonlinear optics. New J. Phys. 14, 095014 (2012).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Kneissl, M., Seong, T.-Y., Han, J. & Amano, H. The emergence and prospects of deep-ultraviolet light-emitting diode technologies. Nat. Photon. 13, 233–244 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Bishop, S. G. et al. Room temperature quantum emitter in aluminum nitride. ACS Photonics 7, 1636–1641 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Lu, T.-J. et al. Bright high-purity quantum emitters in aluminum nitride integrated photonics. ACS Photonics 7, 2650–2657 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Bruch, A. W. et al. 17000%/w second-harmonic conversion efficiency in single-crystalline aluminum nitride microresonators. Appl. Phys. Lett. 113, 131102 (2018).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Liu, X. et al. Beyond 100 THz-spanning ultraviolet frequency combs in a non-centrosymmetric crystalline waveguide. Nat. Commun. 10, 2971 (2019).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Bruch, A. W. et al. Pockels soliton microcomb. Nat. Photon. 15, 21–27 (2021).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Chang, L. et al. Heterogeneously integrated gaas waveguides on insulator for efficient frequency conversion. Laser & Photon. Rev. 12, 1800149 (2018).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Hickstein, D. D. et al. Ultrabroadband supercontinuum generation and frequency-comb stabilization using on-chip waveguides with both cubic and quadratic nonlinearities. Phys. Rev. Appl. 8, 014025 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Yu, M., Desiatov, B., Okawachi, Y., Gaeta, A. L. & Lončar, M. Coherent two-octave-spanning supercontinuum generation in lithium-niobate waveguides. Opt. Lett. 44, 1222–1225 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Okawachi, Y. et al. Chip-based self-referencing using integrated lithium niobate waveguides. Optica 7, 702–707 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Liu, X. et al. Integrated continuous-wave aluminum nitride raman laser. Optica 4, 893–896 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Liu, X. et al. Integrated high-q crystalline aln microresonators for broadband kerr and raman frequency combs. ACS Photonics 5, 1943–1950 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Liu, X. et al. Ultra-high-q uv microring resonators based on a single-crystalline aln platform. Optica 5, 1279–1282 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Majkić, A. et al. Optical nonlinear and electro-optical coefficients in bulk aluminium nitride single crystals. Phys. Status Solidi B 254, 1700077 (2017).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Karpov, M. et al. Raman self-frequency shift of dissipative kerr solitons in an optical microresonator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 103902 (2016).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Gong, Z., Liu, X., Xu, Y. & Tang, H. X. Near-octave lithium niobate soliton microcomb. Optica 7, 1275–1278 (2020).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Cherenkov, A., Lobanov, V. & Gorodetsky, M. Dissipative kerr solitons and cherenkov radiation in optical microresonators with third-order dispersion. Phys. Rev. A 95, 033810 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Zhang, S. et al. Terahertz wave generation using a soliton microcomb. Opt. Express 27, 35257–35266 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Yi, X. et al. Single-mode dispersive waves and soliton microcomb dynamics. Nat. Commun. 8, 14869 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Bruch, A. W., Liu, X., Surya, J. B., Zou, C.-L. & Tang, H. X. On-chip χ(2) microring optical parametric oscillator. Optica 6, 1361–1366 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Surya, J. B., Guo, X., Zou, C.-L. & Tang, H. X. Control of second-harmonic generation in doubly resonant aluminum nitride microrings to address a rubidium two-photon clock transition. Opt. Lett. 43, 2696–2699 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Li, J., Yi, X., Lee, H., Diddams, S. A. & Vahala, K. J. Electro-optical frequency division and stable microwave synthesis. Science 345, 309–313 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Gong, Z. et al. Photonic dissipation control for kerr soliton generation in strongly raman-active media. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 183901 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported by DARPA SCOUT (W31P4Q-15-1-0006). H.X.T. acknowledges partial support from DARPA’s ACES program as part of the Draper-NIST collaboration (HR0011-16-C-0118) and DARPA’s A-Phi program with a subcontract from Sandia labs (DENA0003525). The authors thank Y. Sun, S. Rinehart, and K. Woods in Yale cleanrooms and M. Rooks in YINQE for assistance in the device fabrication, and J. Xie and M. Xu in the laboratory for the microwave circuit discussion.

Author information




H.X.T and X.L conceived the idea. X.L. performed the device design, fabrication, and measurement with the assistance from Z.G., A.B., J.S. and J.L., Z.G. and X.L. performed the soliton simulation. X.L. and H.X.T. wrote the manuscript with the input from all other authors. H.X.T supervised the project.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hong X. Tang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review informationNature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, X., Gong, Z., Bruch, A.W. et al. Aluminum nitride nanophotonics for beyond-octave soliton microcomb generation and self-referencing. Nat Commun 12, 5428 (2021).

Download citation


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing