Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Observation of nuclear-spin Seebeck effect

Abstract

Thermoelectric effects have been applied to power generators and temperature sensors that convert waste heat into electricity. The effects, however, have been limited to electrons to occur, and inevitably disappear at low temperatures due to electronic entropy quenching. Here, we report thermoelectric generation caused by nuclear spins in a solid: nuclear-spin Seebeck effect. The sample is a magnetically ordered material MnCO3 having a large nuclear spin (I = 5/2) of 55Mn nuclei and strong hyperfine coupling, with a Pt contact. In the system, we observe low-temperature thermoelectric signals down to 100 mK due to nuclear-spin excitation. Our theoretical calculation in which interfacial Korringa process is taken into consideration quantitatively reproduces the results. The nuclear thermoelectric effect demonstrated here offers a way for exploring thermoelectric science and technologies at ultralow temperatures.

Introduction

Thermoelectric effects enable the direct conversion of thermal energy into electric energy, promising for power generation and waste heat recovery. Most of the prevalent thermoelectric generators have relied on the Seebeck effect, which is the generation of an electric voltage by placing a conductor junction in a temperature gradient1,2,3. Recently, in the study of spintronics, a spin analog of the Seebeck effect—the spin Seebeck effect (SSE)4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20—was discovered. The SSE is the generation of a spin current, a flow of spin angular momentum, as a result of a temperature gradient applied across a junction consisting of a magnet and a metal17. In electronic SSE, a thermally generated magnon flow in a magnet injects a conduction-electron spin current into the adjacent metal via the interfacial electronic spin exchange8,9,13,16. The spin current injected into a metal can be converted into a voltage by the inverse spin Hall effect (ISHE)21,22,23,24, enabling unexplored approaches toward thermoelectric conversion and energy-harvesting technologies10,17,18.

Up to now, all the thermoelectric effects have been an exclusive feature of electrons1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20. At low temperatures, however, their efficiency is dramatically suppressed, as the thermodynamic entropy of electrons steeply reduces to zero when approaching absolute zero temperature, according to the third law of thermodynamics. In the case of Seebeck effects in semiconductors, the entropy reduction is related to the exponential suppression of the thermally excited charge carriers2, whereas, in SSEs, it is related to the freezing out of spin fluctuations (magnons)15,16,17. Seebeck effects in metals are also suppressed at low temperatures, as the efficiency is governed by \({k}_{\mathrm{B}}T/{\epsilon }_{\mathrm{F}}\)1, where kB is the Boltzmann constant, T the environmental temperature, and \({\epsilon }_{\mathrm{F}}\) the Fermi energy. Therefore, so far, the thermoelectric applications have been limited to higher temperatures, as no mechanism in the ultralow temperature regime (~mK range) has been found.

In solids, there is a hitherto unexplored entropy carrier that is well activated even at ultralow temperatures: a nuclear spin. Because of its tiny gyromagnetic ratio γn (~103 times less than that of electrons25 γe), a nuclear spin exhibits much lower excitation energy than that of electron spins in ambient fields, allowing its thermal agitation. Here, a question arises: can nuclear spins generate thermoelectric effects? If spin angular momentum can be extracted from nuclei in the form of an electron spin current under a temperature bias, it should generate a thermoelectric voltage via the ISHE in an attached metal, realizing all-solid-state thermoelectricity based on atomic nuclei.

Here we report an observation of the nuclear SSE (Fig. 1a) in a heterostructure composed of a Pt film and a crystal of easy-plane canted antiferromagnetic MnCO326,27,28 (Fig. 1d). In MnCO3, 55Mn nuclei, a 100% natural-abundance isotope, carry a large spin I of 5/2 and exhibit strong hyperfine coupling with electrons, which allows spin transfer between nuclei and electrons as recently found in the spin pumping measurements under nuclear magnetic resonance28. In MnCO3 single crystals covered with Pt films, we found a strong thermoelectric signal enhancement down to 100 mK (Fig. 1e), as shown below, which demonstrates thermoelectric generation at ultralow temperatures. The experimental results are quantitatively reproduced by a theory for nuclear SSE in which the Korringa process29 due to the hyperfine coupling between nuclear spins in the MnCO3 and conduction-electron spins in the attached Pt is taken into consideration (Fig. 1a).

Fig. 1: Concept of nuclear-spin Seebeck effect in Pt/MnCO3.
figure 1

a Schematic illustration of the nuclear SSE induced by the Korringa relaxation process29, the spin-conserving flip-flop scattering between a nuclear spin, I, of 55Mn in MnCO3 and an electron spin, S, in Pt via the interfacial hyperfine interaction. Iz represents the z component of the nuclear spin I. b Schematic illustration of the nuclear SSE and the ISHE in a Pt/MnCO3 hybrid structure, where MnCO3 contains nuclear spin I = 5/2 on 55Mn (100% natural abundance). When a temperature gradient (\(\nabla\)T) is applied across the Pt/MnCO3 interface, a spin current (Js) carrying a spin polarization vector \(\hat{\bf{s}}\) is induced in the Pt layer by the nuclear SSE, which is subsequently converted into an electric field (EISHE) via the ISHE in the direction of \({\bf{J}}_{\mathrm{s}}\times \hat{\bf{s}}\)22. Here, \(\hat{\bf{s}}\) is along the external magnetic field B. c A calculated dispersion relation of the electronic spin wave and energy of the nuclear-spin excitation in MnCO3 at a temperature T of 100 mK for several magnetic fields26,27,28. The energy level of 100 mK is plotted with a green dashed line. At T = 100 mK, the electronic spin waves are frozen out, whereas nuclear spins remain thermally active. d Schematic illustration of the orientation of the Mn2+ sublattice electronic magnetization M1 and M2, and the 55Mn nuclear spins I1 and I2 in MnCO3 in the (111) plane when the external field B is applied in the plane (\({\bf{B}}\parallel {\bf{z}}\)). Below the antiferromagnetic ordering temperature TN = 35 K of MnCO3, M1 and M2 are aligned in the (111) plane and canted slightly from the pure antiferromagnetic ordering direction due to the bulk Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction26 (Supplementary Fig. 1). The canting angle θ increases with the external field. θ = 0.26° at zero field, whereas θ = 12° at B = 14 T. Due to the strong hyperfine (Overhauser) field of Bhf ~ 57 T, the sublattice nuclear spins I1 and I2 orient antiparallel to the electronic magnetization M1 and M2 directions, respectively. Here, the antiparallel orientation originates from the nature of the contact hyperfine interaction and the relative sign of the nuclear and electronic gyromagnetic ratios γn and γe30. e Experimental demonstration of the nuclear SSE in Pt/MnCO3. Temperature (T) dependence of the thermoelectric voltage V (normalized by the applied heat power I2rms) at B = 2 T. The error bar represents the SD. The inset shows the B dependence of V/I2rms at T = 101 mK. Theoretical results for the nuclear SSE are also plotted with solid curves.

Results

Sample and measurement setup

We have used the ISHE21,22,23,24 in the Pt film to detect a spin current injected into the film. The ISHE converts a spin current, Js, into an electric field, EISHE, through the spin–orbit interaction of conduction electrons, which can be strong in heavy metals such as Pt10,17. When a spin current induced by a nuclear SSE carries spin polarization \(\hat{\bf{s}}\) parallel to the net nuclear-spin polarization I along the spatial direction Js, EISHE is given by (Fig. 1b)

$${\bf{E}}_{{\rm{ISHE}}}\,=\,\frac{2e}{\hslash }\rho {\theta }_{{\rm{SHE}}}{\bf{J}}_{\mathrm{s}}\times \hat{\bf{s}}$$
(1)

where ρ and θSHE are the resistivity and the spin Hall angle of the Pt layer, respectively. By measuring EISHE, nuclear SSEs can be detected electrically. We note that, as the spin current Js flows normal to the Pt/MnCO3 interface (\({\bf{J}}_{\mathrm{s}}\parallel {\bf{x}}\)), the resultant voltage signal V is maximal for \(\hat{\bf{s}}\,({\parallel} {\bf{I}})\parallel {\bf{z}}\), when EISHE is measured along the y direction shown in Fig. 1b. However, because of the tiny Zeeman coupling of nuclear spins, it is challenging to control nuclear-spin polarization by using B, unlike electronic magnetization in conventional magnets. Nevertheless, we can overcome the difficulty by using a magnetic ordered material carrying a large nuclear spin and strong hyperfine coupling. We have noticed that an antiferromagnet MnCO3 (\(I=5/2\))26,27,28 satisfies all such conditions. Below the Néel temperature (\({T}_{\mathrm{N}}=35\,{\rm{K}}\)) of MnCO3, the Mn2+ sublattice magnetizations M1 and M2 are aligned in the (111) plane and canted slightly from the collinear antiferromagnetic configuration due to the bulk Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction26 (see Fig. 1d and Supplementary Note 1). The hyperfine (Overhauser) fields Bhf acting on the 55Mn sublattice nuclear spins I1 and I2 due to M1 and M2 reach as large as 57 T28, which induce nuclear-spin polarization (~40% at 100 mK) and orient I1 and I2 along the M1 and M2 directions, respectively30, as shown in Fig. 1d. Moreover, the net nuclear-spin polarization (I1 and I2) direction can be controlled by applying B, as the canting angle θ of M1 and M2 changes with B, owing to the very weak magnetocrystalline anisotropy (~0.1 mT within the easy plane26, see Fig. 1d). The advantage enables us to prepare a controllable nuclear-spin polarization in MnCO3, making nuclear SSE experiments feasible.

The SSE devices used in the present study consist of a 10 nm-thick Pt strip [200 μm long (l) and 100 nm wide (w)] deposited on the top of an insulating MnCO3 (111) (\(3\times 3\times 0{.5\,{\rm{mm}}}^{3}\)) crystal (see “Methods” and Supplementary Note 2). The Pt strip acts as a heater as well as a spin-voltage converter based on the ISHE for measuring nuclear SSEs: by applying an a.c. current Ic \((=\sqrt{2}{I}_{{\rm{rms}}}\,\sin \,{{\omega }}t)\,\) to the Pt strip to generate heat and measuring the second harmonic voltage V generated in the Pt by a lock-in technique11,14, we can selectively detect the ISHE voltage arising from the temperature drop across the Pt/MnCO3 interface induced by the Joule heating I2rms of the applied current. The SSE experiments were conducted with a 4He cryostat down to 1.82 K using a Pt/MnCO3 device named Device 1 and with a 3He–4He dilution refrigerator down to 100 mK using a similar device named Device 2. The Pt/MnCO3 devices were mounted in the cryostats and the magnetic field B was applied along the z direction as shown in Fig. 1b. Further details are described in “Methods.”

Observation of nuclear SSE

In Fig. 2a, we show the voltage V data measured at \(T=20\,{\rm{K}}\) and 1.82 K for the Pt/MnCO3 Device 1. At 20 K, no voltage signal appears with the application of B. On the other hand, at a lower temperature \(T=1.82\,{\rm{K}}\), an unconventional voltage signal shows up. The sign of V/I2rms reverses by reversing the B direction. The signal intensity increases monotonically with increasing B from zero and it takes a broad peak at around 4 T. For further high B, V/I2rms starts to decrease. We confirmed that the observed signal shares the characteristic feature of ISHE induced by SSE10,17; V appears only when a heat current is applied and the V intensity scales linearly with the heat power I2rms. The signal intensity is maximal when \({\bf{B}}\parallel {\bf{z}}\) but vanishes when \({\bf{B}}\perp z\), consistent with the prediction of Eq. (1). The sign of V reverses when the Pt strip (\({\theta }_{{\rm{SHE}}} > 0\)) is replaced with tungsten exhibiting a negative10 θSHE. The results confirm that the voltage signal is induced by thermally driven spin currents and ISHE (see Supplementary Notes 35 for details).

Fig. 2: Observation of nuclear-spin Seebeck effect in Pt/MnCO3.
figure 2

a B dependence of V/I2rms (voltage V normalized by the square of the applied charge current Irms) for the Pt/MnCO3 Device 1 at T = 20 K (red) and 1.82 K (blue). b T dependence of the maximum V/I2rms (defined as Vmax/I2rms) for the Pt/MnCO3 Device 1 at 1.8 K < T < 50 K. The inset shows the T dependence of Vmax/I2rms for the Pt/MnCO3 Device 2 at 100 mK < T < 10 K measured with a dilution refrigerator. The error bar represents the SD. c, d B dependence of V/I2rms for the Pt/MnCO3 Devices 1 (c) and 2 (d) at selected temperatures. The Pt/MnCO3 Device 1 exhibits electrical resistance one order of magnitude higher than that for Device 2, resulting in an overall higher intensity of V/I2rms in the Pt/MnCO3 Device 1 (see Supplementary Note 6 for details).

Surprisingly, the signal intensity persists down to the ultralow temperature regime. Figure 2c, d show the B dependence of V/I2rms at 1.8 K < T < 50 K for Device 1 and at 100 mK < T < 1.6 K for Device 2, respectively. With decreasing temperature T starting from 50 K, the SSE signal appears below ~10 K and its intensity dramatically increases by further decreasing T (see Fig. 2c and b, in which the T dependence of the maximum V/I2rms is plotted). Importantly, the signal intensity continues to increase down to ultralow temperatures on the order of ~100 mK (see Fig. 2d and the inset to Fig. 2b). Moreover, the signal persists in the higher field range up to 14 T even at such ultralow temperatures, which is totally distinct from the conventional SSE driven by electronic magnetization dynamics. For instance, in ferrimagnetic Y3Fe5O12, the SSE intensity decreases monotonically with decreasing temperature below 20 K and completely disappears below 5 K at 14 T due to the freezing out of magnons15,16,17. The maximum output of Device 2 normalized by its electrical resistance \({R}_{{\rm{Pt}}}\), heating power RPtI2rms, and geometric factor \({l}^{-1}\) is as large as Vmaxl/(R2PtI2rms)  58 nA mW−1 at 101 mK, which is nearly two orders of magnitude higher than that of a prototypical room-temperature SSE device made of Pt/Y3Fe5O12 (~1 nA mW−1) having the same electrode and heater dimensions [see Supplementary Note 7 and Eq. (3) in Supplementary Note 9 for details].

Nuclear- and electron-spin excitation spectra in MnCO3

We now discuss the results in terms of the nuclear- and electron-spin excitation features in MnCO3. In Fig. 1c, we show the electronic and nuclear-spin excitation spectra in MnCO326,27,28 for several fields at T = 100 mK, whose thermal energy kBT is depicted as the green dashed line. Above kBT, thermal excitation is exponentially suppressed. The lower branch at around 600 MHz, corresponding to 30 mK, originates from the nuclear-spin excitation ωn, whose excitation gap is dominated by the strong hyperfine internal field Bhf = ωn/γn 57 T. The upper branches represent the electronic spin-wave modes ωmk, which shift toward higher frequencies with increasing B due to the strong Zeeman effect. At B = 14 T, the electronic spin excitation gap \({\omega }_{{\rm{m0}}}(\approx {\gamma }_{\rm{e}}B)\) is ~19 K, two orders of magnitude greater than the thermal energy = 100 mK, resulting in a negligibly small value of the Boltzmann factor \(\exp (-\hslash {\omega }_{{\rm{m0}}}/{k}_{\mathrm{B}}T)\,{ \sim 10}^{-82}\ll 1.\) If the SSE we measured were driven by the electronic spin-wave modes, the SSE signal would be completely suppressed by applying a strong field of 14 T, as with the conventional SSE of Y3Fe5O1215. This clearly shows the irrelevance of the electronic SSE to the observed signal at low temperatures. On the other hand, the nuclear-spin mode can be greatly excited even by such a small thermal energy of ~100 mK and it remains almost unaffected by the applied B due to the tiny Zeeman effects, much weaker than the hyperfine internal field ~ 57 T (Fig. 1c); the nuclear spins can contribute to SSEs even in such a low-T and high-B environment. The results also suggest that direct coupling between nuclear spins in the MnCO3 and electrons in the Pt at the interface should be responsible for the SSE, rather than the interfacial electronic exchange mediated by the gapped magnons under strong magnetic fields.

Theoretical model for nuclear SSE

We theoretically model the nuclear SSE in which direct nuclear-electron coupling due to the Korringa process29 is taken into consideration. In the model, the spin current \({J}_{{\rm{ne}}}\) is generated by the interfacial hyperfine interaction between nuclear spins in the MnCO3 and conduction-electron spins in the Pt under the temperature bias \({T}_{\mathrm{e}}-{T}_{\mathrm{p}}\) (see Fig. 3a and Supplementary Note 9 for details). Here, Te and Tp represent effective temperatures for electrons in the Pt and phonons in the MnCO3 near the interface, respectively. The nuclear-spin current \({J}_{{\rm{ne}}}\) arises in proportion to the effective temperature difference between the electrons in the Pt (Te) and nuclei in the MnCO3 (Tn): \({J}_{{\rm{ne}}}={\Gamma }_{{\rm{ne}}}{k}_{\mathrm{B}}({T}_{\mathrm{e}}-{T}_{\mathrm{n}})\). Here Tn may deviate from the electron Te due to the nuclear-phonon thermalization in MnCO3 given by \({J}_{{\rm{np}}}={\Gamma }_{\rm{np}}{k}_{\mathrm{B}}({T}_{\mathrm{n}}-{T}_{\mathrm{p}}),\,\) resulting in the finite spin current \({J}_{{\rm{ne}}}\). The expression for the nuclear SSE coefficient reads

$${{\cal{S}}}_{\rm{n}}=\frac{{g}_{\mathrm{n}}^{\uparrow \downarrow }}{4\pi I}\pi \chi b\frac{\hslash {\omega }_{\mathrm{n}}}{{k}_{\mathrm{B}}T}\left[\frac{{T}_{\mathrm{e}}-{T}_{\mathrm{n}}}{{T}_{\mathrm{e}}-{T}_{\mathrm{p}}}\right]$$
(2)

where \({g}_{{\rm{n}}}^{\uparrow \downarrow }\) is the nuclear spin-mixing conductance per unit area, \(\chi\) the normalized antiferromagnetic transverse susceptibility such that \(\theta =\chi b\) is the canting angle, \(b\equiv \hslash {\gamma }_{\mathrm{e}}{s}_{\mathrm{e}}B\) the normalized magnetic field with saturated spin density se (\({s}_{\mathrm{e}}\equiv S/V\), for volume per site V), and T the average temperature. The bracketed expression in Eq. (2) is evaluated as \(({T}_{\mathrm{e}}-{T}_{\mathrm{n}})/({T}_{\mathrm{e}}-{T}_{\mathrm{p}})={(1+{\Gamma }_{{\rm{ne}}}/{\Gamma }_{{\rm{np}}})}^{-1}\) from the steady-state condition \({J}_{{\rm{ne}}}={J}_{{\rm{np}}}\)31. Here, Γne 1/T [Eq. (1) shown in Supplementary Note 9] and Γnp 1/2m0 is derived by Fermi’s Golden rule for the nuclear-phonon thermalization rate mediated by virtual magnons (see Supplementary Note 9), which allow us to evaluate the B dependence of \({T}_{\mathrm{e}}-{T}_{\mathrm{n}}\). As shown in Fig. 3b, it is maximal at zero field by the strong thermalization (i.e., \({T}_{\mathrm{n}} \sim {T}_{\mathrm{p}}\)) and decreases gradually with B. There is a crossover field Bc, marked by Γnp falling below Γne (see the results at \(T=100\,{\rm{mK}}\) and 1 K in Fig. 3b). In Fig. 3c, we compare the B dependence of the experimental V/I2rms (blue plots) for Device 2 and calculated V/I2rms based on the nuclear SSE \({{\cal{S}}}_{{\rm{n}}}\) (red solid curve) at \(T=100\,{\rm{mK}}\). Of important note, the experimental data are quantitatively reproduced by the calculation. Such agreement is confirmed also for other B and T regions (see Fig. 3d, e). A non-monotonic field response of V now becomes evident: for \(B\ll {B}_{\mathrm{c}}\), the SSE signal increases in proportion to B (\({{\cal{S}}}_{\mathrm{n}}\propto B\)), owing to the increased canting angle, and it takes a maximum at \(B \sim {B}_{\mathrm{c}}\). For \(B\gg {B}_{\mathrm{c}}\), the SSE signal decreases monotonically with B (\({{\cal{S}}}_{\mathrm{n}}\propto {B}^{-1}\)) due to the reduction of thermal nonequilibrium \({T}_{\mathrm{e}}-{T}_{\mathrm{n}}\) (\(\propto {B}^{-2}\)) between the electron and nuclear systems (see Fig. 3b). We also evaluated the electronic SSE, \({{\cal{S}}}_{{\rm{m}}}\), driven by the antiferromagnetic spin-wave mode ωmk (see Supplementary Note 9 for details) and found that its intensity, as well as B and T dependencies, do not explain the experimental results (see Fig. 3c and its inset), which confirm that the nuclear SSE dominates the observed SSE.

Fig. 3: Comparison between experiment and theory.
figure 3

a Interfacial nuclear-spin current and thermal equilibration of nuclear spins in MnCO3. An interfacial spin current, Jne, is mediated by the Korringa process through the hyperfine interaction between nuclear spins of 55Mn and electron spins in the metal at the Pt/MnCO3 interface. Jne arises in proportion to the effective temperature difference between the electrons in Pt (Te) and nuclei in MnCO3 (Tn): \({J}_{{\rm{ne}}}={\Gamma }_{{\rm{ne}}}{k}_{\mathrm{B}}({T}_{\mathrm{e}}-{T}_{\mathrm{n}})\). Here, the difference Te − Tn may be triggered by the interfacial temperature drop Te − Tp between the Pt and MnCO3 (Tp: phonon temperature in MnCO3 close to the interface) and the thermalization between nuclei and phonons in MnCO3, whose rate is given by \({J}_{{\rm{np}}}={\Gamma }_{{\rm{np}}}{k}_{\mathrm{B}}({T}_{\mathrm{n}}-{T}_{\mathrm{p}})\). b B dependence of the calculated temperature difference \({T}_{\mathrm{e}}-{T}_{\mathrm{n}}\) normalized by the interfacial temperature drop \({T}_{\mathrm{e}}-{T}_{\mathrm{p}}\) at T = 100 mK and 1 K. In the steady state, \({J}_{{\rm{ne}}}={J}_{{\rm{np}}}\)31, which gives \(({T}_{\mathrm{e}}-{T}_{\mathrm{n}})/({T}_{\mathrm{e}}-{T}_{\mathrm{p}})={\Gamma }_{{\rm{np}}}/({\Gamma }_{{\rm{np}}}+{\Gamma }_{{\rm{ne}}})\). Bc indicates the crossover field, where \({\Gamma }_{{\rm{ne}}}={\Gamma }_{{\rm{np}}}\). c Comparison between the B dependence of the experimental V/I2rms (blue plots) for the Pt/MnCO3 Device 2 and the calculated V/I2rms for the nuclear SSE \({{\mathscr{S}}}_{{\rm{n}}}\) (red solid curve) and for the electronic SSE \({{\mathscr{S}}}_{{\rm{m}}}\) (gray solid curve) at T = 101 mK (see Supplementary Note 9 for details). The inset shows a blowup of the calculated V/I2rms for the electronic SSE \({{\mathscr{S}}}_{{\rm{m}}}\) (multiplied by 103). d Comparison between the B dependence of the experimental V/I2rms (blue plots) and the calculated V/I2rms for the nuclear SSE \({{\mathscr{S}}}_{{\rm{n}}}\) (red solid line) at 100 mK < T < 1 K. e Comparison between the T dependence of the experimental V/I2rms (green rhombus) and the calculated V/I2rms for the nuclear SSE \({{\mathscr{S}}}_{{\rm{n}}}\) (red solid curve). The error bar represents the SD.

Discussion

We finally discuss the difference between the previous nuclear-spin pumping28 and the present nuclear SSE. For the nuclear-spin pumping, the measured voltage is maximal at a relatively low field of ~0.3 T and then starts to decrease with B. In such a low-B range, the excitation gap of electronic spin-wave branch in MnCO3 is comparable to that of the nuclear spins, and a nuclear-spin wave, hybridized electronic spin-wave and nuclear-spin mode32,33,34, is excited. The experimental result in ref. 28 was thereby attributed to the coherent nuclear spin-wave formation, the electronic (magnetization) component of which pumps a spin current into an adjacent metallic layer in analogy with the conventional electronic spin pumping for a magnet/metal bilayer. On the other hand, the present nuclear SSE increases with B up to around 4–5 T, whereas nuclear-electronic hybridization is quickly suppressed as the electronic spin waves become gapped out. This suggests that a different physical mechanism governs the nuclear SSE, which is reasonable, as the nuclear pumping in the SSE is not limited to a coherent long-wavelength dynamics. We thus develop a nuclear SSE theory in terms of interfacial Korringa relaxation, in which nuclear-spin fluctuation directly transmits a spin current into an attached metallic layer via interfacial hyperfine interaction, and found quantitative agreement between the experiment and calculation. The Korringa mechanism does not need strong nuclear-electronic spin hybridization in the magnetic layer and also electronic spin transfer at the interface. This may extend a class of materials applicable for nuclear spintronics; materials having magnetic elements with nuclear spins and strong hyperfine interaction, such as 55Mn and 59Co (both of which are 100% natural abundance), can be potential sources of nuclear-spin currents.

In summary, we demonstrated the thermoelectric conversion driven by nuclear spin: the nuclear SSE. The nuclear SSE is enhanced at ultralow temperatures, in stark contrast to conventional electron-based thermoelectricity. It is surely worthwhile to explore nuclear SSEs in other systems to show the generality of the phenomenon. Materials of interest include easy-axis antiferromagnetic insulators having a large nuclear spin and exhibiting a spin-flop transition, at which the electronic magnon gap comes close to the low energy scales relevant to the nuclear dynamics35; for the nuclear SSE, this is instrumental in thermal equilibration of the nuclei within the magnetic material.

The present work may serve as the bridge between nuclear-spin science and thermoelectricity and marks the beginning of a research field “Nuclear thermoelectricity”. It is also worth exploring the reciprocal of the nuclear SSE, as it will be applied to making a nuclear heat pump working at ultralow temperatures.

Methods

Sample preparation

We used single-crystalline MnCO3 slabs with a size of 3 × 3 × 0.5 mm3, which are commercially available from SurfaceNet. The largest plane is (111) in the rhombohedral representation36,37. On the top of the (111) plane of the MnCO3 slabs, 10 nm-thick Pt strips (200 μm long and nominally 100 nm wide) were patterned by electron beam lithography and lift-off methods (see also Supplementary Note 2). The Pt strips were deposited by magnetron sputtering in a 10−1 Pa Ar atmosphere. For a control experiment, we also prepared W/MnCO3 devices, where the Pt strips are replaced with 10 nm-thick W strips (200 μm long and 500 nm wide) exhibiting a negative θSHE10,38,39.

SSE measurement

We measured the SSE by a standard lock-in technique11,14,40,41 with a PPMS (Quantum Design) from 1.8 to 50 K and a 3He–4He dilution refrigerator (KelvinoxMX200, Oxford Instruments; cooling power of 200 µW at 100 mK) from 100 mK to 10 K. An a.c. charge current (\({I}_{\mathrm{c}}=\sqrt{2}{I}_{{\rm{rms}}}\,\sin \,{{\omega }}{t}\)) was applied to the Pt strip with a current source (6221, Keithley) and the generated voltage V across the strip was recorded with a lock-in amplifier (LI5640, NF Corporation). For the measurements with the dilution refrigerator, we further introduced a voltage preamplifier (1201, DL Instruments) and a programmable filter (3625, NF Corporation) to reduce signal noise. The typical a.c. charge current property is as follows: the root-mean-square (rms) amplitude Irms of 0.1–5 μA and the frequency \(\omega /2{\rm{\pi }}\) of 13.423 Hz. All the VB data are anti-symmetrized with respect to the magnetic field B.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Code availability

The codes used in theoretical simulations and calculations are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Ashcroft, N. W. & Mermin, N. D. Solid State Physics (Saunders College, 1976).

  2. Goldsmid, H. J. Introduction to Thermoelectricity (Springer-Verlag, 2009).

  3. Bell, L. E. Cooling, heating, generating power, recovering waste heat with thermoelectric systems. Science 321, 1457–1461 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Uchida, K. et al. Observation of the spin Seebeck effect. Nature 455, 778–781 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Uchida, K. et al. Spin Seebeck insulator. Nat. Mater. 9, 894–897 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jaworski, C. M. et al. Observation of the spin-Seebeck effect in a ferromagnetic semiconductor. Nat. Mater. 9, 898–903 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Uchida, K. et al. Observation of longitudinal spin-Seebeck effect in magnetic insulators. Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 172505 (2010).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Xiao, J., Bauer, G. E. W., Uchida, K., Saitoh, E. & Maekawa, S. Theory of magnon-driven spin Seebeck effect. Phys. Rev. B 81, 214418 (2010).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rezende, S. M. et al. Magnon spin-current theory for the longitudinal spin-Seebeck effect. Phys. Rev. B 89, 014416 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Uchida, K. et al. Longitudinal spin Seebeck effect: from fundamentals to applications. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 26, 343202 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wu, S. M., Pearson, J. E. & Bhattacharya, A. Paramagnetic spin Seebeck effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 186602 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Seki, S. et al. Thermal generation of spin current in an antiferromagnet. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 266601 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bender, S. A. & Tserkovnyak, Y. Interfacial spin and heat transfer between metals and magnetic insulators. Phys. Rev. B 91, 140402 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wu, S. M. et al. Antiferromagnetic spin Seebeck effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 097204 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kikkawa, T., Uchida, K., Daimon, S. & Saitoh, E. Complete suppression of longitudinal spin Seebeck effect by frozen magnetization dynamics in Y3Fe5O12. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 85, 065003 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rezende, S. M., Rodríguez-Suárez, R. L., Cunha, R. O., Lopez Ortiz, J. C. & Azevedo, A. Bulk magnon spin current theory for the longitudinal spin Seebeck effect. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 400, 171–177 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Uchida, K. et al. Thermoelectric generation based on spin Seebeck effects. Proc. IEEE 104, 1946–1973 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. He, J. & Tritt, T. M. Advances in thermoelectric materials research: Looking back and moving forward. Science 357, eaak9997 (2017).

  19. Lebrun, R. et al. Tunable long-distance spin transport in a crystalline antiferromagnetic iron oxide. Nature 561, 222–225 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Li, J. et al. Spin current from sub-terahertz-generated antiferromagnetic magnons. Nature 578, 70–74 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Azevedo, A., Vilela Leão, L. H., Rodriguez-Suarez, R. L., Oliveira, A. B. & Rezende, S. M. dc effect in ferromagnetic resonance: evidence of the spin-pumping effect? J. Appl. Phys. 97, 10C715 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Saitoh, E., Ueda, M., Miyajima, H. & Tatara, G. Conversion of spin current into charge current at room temperature: inverse spin-Hall effect. Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 182509 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Valenzuela, S. O. & Tinkham, M. Direct electronic measurement of the spin Hall effect. Nature 442, 176–179 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Costache, M. V., Sladkov, M., Watts, S. M., van der Wal, C. H. & van Wees, B. J. Electrical detection of spin pumping due to the precessing magnetization of a single ferromagnet. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 216603 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Abragam, A. Principles of Nuclear Magnetism (Clarendon, 1961).

  26. Fink, H. & Shaltiel, D. Nuclear frequency pulling in a Dzialoshinskii-Moriya-type weak ferromagnet: MnCO3. Phys. Rev. 136, A218–A222 (1964).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Abdurakhimov, L. V. et al. Nonlinear NMR and magnon BEC in antiferromagnetic materials with coupled electron and nuclear spin precession. Phys. Rev. B 97, 024425 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Shiomi, Y. et al. Spin pumping from nuclear spin waves. Nat. Phys. 15, 22–26 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Korringa, J. Nuclear magnetic relaxation and resonance line shift in metals. Physica 16, 601–610 (1950).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Watson, R. E. & Freeman, A. J. Origin of effective fields in magnetic materials. Phys. Rev. 123, 2027 (1961).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Gorter, C. J. Paramagnetic Relaxation (Elsevier Publishing Company, 1947).

  32. Suhl, H. Effective nuclear spin interactions in ferromagnets. Phys. Rev. 109, 606 (1958).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Nakamura, T. Indirect coupling of nuclear spins in antiferromagnet with particular reference to MnF2 at very low temperatures. Prog. Theor. Phys. 20, 542–552 (1958).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. de Gennes, P. G., Pincus, P. A., Harmann-Boutron, F. & Winter, J. M. Nuclear magnetic resonance modes in magnetic material. I. Theory. Phys. Rev. 129, 1105–1115 (1963).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. King, A. R., Jaccarino, V. & Rezende, S. M. Nuclear magnons and nuclear magnetostatic modes in MnF2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 37, 533–536 (1976).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Borovik-Romanov, A. S. Investigation of weak ferromagnetism in the MnCO3 single crystal. J. Exptl Theor. Phys. 36, 766–781 (1959).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Lee, J. B. et al. Canted antiferromagnetism on a nanodimensional spherical surface geometry: the case of MnCO3 small hollow nanospheres. Phys. Rev. B 86, 224407 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Pai, C.-F. et al. Spin transfer torque devices utilizing the giant spin Hall effect of tungsten. Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 122404 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Sinova, J., Valenzuela, S. O., Wunderlich, J., Back, C. H. & Jungwirth, T. Spin Hall effects. Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 1213–1259 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Vlietstra, N. et al. Simultaneous detection of the spin-Hall magnetoresistance and the spin-Seebeck effect in platinum and tantalum on yttrium iron garnet. Phys. Rev. B 90, 174436 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Cornelissen, L. J. et al. Nonlocal magnon-polaron transport in yttrium iron garnet. Phys. Rev. B 96, 104441 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Y. Chen, J. Lustikova, T. Hioki, N. Yokoi, H. Chudo, M. Imai, K. Sato, and G. E. W. Bauer for fruitful discussions and T. Nojima for his valuable comments on low-temperature experiments. This work was supported by JST ERATO “Spin Quantum Rectification Project” (JPMJER1402), JST CREST (JPMJCR20C1 and JPMJCR20T2), JSPS KAKENHI (JP19H05600, JP19K21031, JP20H02599, JP20K22476, and JP20K15160), MEXT [Innovative Area “Nano Spin Conversion Science” (JP26103005)], and Daikin Industries, Ltd. The work at UCLA was supported by the US Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences under Award number DE-SC0012190. K.O. acknowledges support from GP-Spin at Tohoku University. R.R. acknowledges support from the European Commission through the project 734187-SPICOLOST (H2020-MSCA-RISE-2016), the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program through the Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions grant agreement SPEC number 894006 and the Spanish Ministry of Science (RYC 2019-026915-I).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

T.K., T.S., and K.O. fabricated the devices. T.K. and T.M. constructed the experimental setup with the help of R.R. and K.O. T.K., T.M., H.I., T.S., K.T., and S.D. performed the experiments and collected the data. T.K. and H.I. analyzed the data with input from D.R. D.R. and Y.T. developed the theoretical explanations. E.S. and Y.T. conceived and supervised the project. T.K. and D.R. wrote the paper with review and input from E.S. and Y.T. T.K., D.R., H.I., T.M., T.S., K.T., S.D., K.O., R.R., S.T., Y.S., Y.T., and E.S. discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Kikkawa.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Sergio Rezende and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kikkawa, T., Reitz, D., Ito, H. et al. Observation of nuclear-spin Seebeck effect. Nat Commun 12, 4356 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24623-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24623-6

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing