Doping-free complementary WSe2 circuit via van der Waals metal integration

Abstract

Two-dimensional (2D) semiconductors have attracted considerable attention for the development of ultra-thin body transistors. However, the polarity control of 2D transistors and the achievement of complementary logic functions remain critical challenges. Here, we report a doping-free strategy to modulate the polarity of WSe2 transistors using same contact metal but different integration methods. By applying low-energy van der Waals integration of Au electrodes, we observed robust and optimized p-type transistor behavior, which is in great contrast to the transistors fabricated on the same WSe2 flake using conventional deposited Au contacts with pronounced n-type characteristics. With the ability to switch majority carrier type and to achieve optimized contact for both electrons and holes, a doping-free logic inverter is demonstrated with higher voltage gain of 340, at the bias voltage of 5.5 V. Furthermore, the simple polarity control strategy is extended for realizing more complex logic functions such as NAND and NOR.

Introduction

Two-dimensional (2D) semiconductors have attracted considerable attention as ultrathin channel materials for transistors1,2,3,4,5. Their atomically thin body and dangling-bond free surface offer significant potential for ultimate transistor scaling (down to atomic thin-body thickness), which is essential for decreasing off-state power consumption and further extending Moore’s Law6. To date, one major challenge of a 2D transistor is the uncontrollable device polarity (n- or p-type) and majority carrier type, posing a key limitation for realizing complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) logic function in 2D transistors. In modern silicon microelectronics, the doping concentration of the silicon channel and transistor polarity are achieved by introducing extrinsic (e.g., B for p-type and As for n-type) dopants through high-energy ion implantation and subsequently high-temperature activation7,8. However, applying existing state-of-the-art ion-implantation approaches to a 2D semiconductor is not straightforward because there is little physical space for impurity dopants in such atomically thin lattice9. Hence, the majority carrier type of a typical 2D transistor is limited to its intrinsic properties and is largely fixed once exfoliated or synthesized.

Considerable efforts have been devoted to realize 2D CMOS functions in the past few years10,11,12,13. Early attempts focused on using two different 2D semiconductors, where one material is used for the NMOS (e.g., MoS2 and MoSe2) and a different material is used for PMOS (e.g., black phosphorus, WSe2)14,15,16. Although demonstrating desired logic functions, this method is still relied on the uncontrollable intrinsic doping, and is not obviously compatible with CMOS technology since it involves two materials with distinct synthesizing and processing conditions. Alternatively, the selective doping of 2D semiconductors can be achieved through a gentle chemical surface absorption with charge transfer process between 2D semiconductors and adsorbate, which could effectively modulate 2D carrier concentration and their majority carrier type (electrons or holes). For example, polyethyleneimine or benzyl viologen molecule was employed to achieve n-type doping in multilayer MoS2 (refs. 17,18), and the chloride molecule was applied to increase electron-doping density of WS2 and MoS2 (ref. 19). However, such chemical absorption approaches typically suffer from poor stability due to the weak interaction between the surface dopants and 2D materials. Recently, the CMOS logic functions are also demonstrated in 2D channels (e.g., WSe2 and MoTe2) using metals with different work function. For example, Ag and Pt have been applied as the contact metal of WSe2 to achieve the NMOS and PMOS, respectively, and similarly, Ti and Pt are integrated in MoTe2 flake to realize CMOS inverter20,21. However, due to the strong Fermi level pinning effect, large Schottky barrier is typically observed in 2D/metal interfaces, regardless of the metal work function used22,23,24,25. Therefore, using this approach, it is difficult to achieve optimized device performance in both p- and n-type devices at the same time. In addition, the use of asymmetric contact metals could further complicate the fabrication processes.

Here, we report a doping-free strategy to achieve CMOS circuit functions by using the same contact metal gold (Au) and the same channel material WSe2, but different metal integration methods. By applying low-energy van der Waals (vdW) integration of Au electrode, we observed a robust and consistent p-type behavior in multilayer WSe2. This is in great contrast to the transistors fabricated on the same WSe2 flake using conventional deposited Au contacts, where pronounced n-type characteristic is always observed26,27. To further gain insight of this phenomenon, we conducted detailed analysis through thickness-dependent measurement and density functional theory (DFT) simulation, and attributed the polarity change of WSe2 to the controllable Fermi level pinning effect using different metal integration methods. With the ability to control the polarity of WSe2 transistors and to achieve optimized contact to both PMOS and NMOS using the same metal, a logic inverter is demonstrated with the highest voltage gain of 340 (at a bias voltage of 5.5 V) and total noise margin over 90%. Furthermore, the polarity-controllable strategy is also extended to realize more complex logic functions such as NAND and NOR. Our results not only demonstrate robust and high-performance CMOS logic circuit using vdW metal electrodes, but also provide a doping-free method to control the polarity of a 2D semiconductor using the same contact metal, shedding light to high-performance 2D electronics and CMOS design.

Results

Fabrication processes and electrical measurement

Figure 1a–f schematically illustrates our device structure. To fabricate the device, multilayer WSe2 flakes with various thicknesses are first mechanically exfoliated onto a heavily doped silicon substrate (as gate) with 300-nm silicon oxide (as gate dielectric). Next, 50-nm Au electrode pair is pre-fabricated on a sacrificial Si wafer and then mechanically released using a previously developed method26 (see “Methods” section for fabrication details). The released metal electrodes are aligned under a microscope and physically laminated on top of the WSe2 flake using a vdW metal integration process, resulting in an atomically sharp and clean Au/WSe2 interface26,27 (Fig. 1a–d). For comparison, another pair of Au electrode with the same thickness (50-nm thick) is also deposited on the same WSe2 flake using conventional electron beam lithography followed by high vacuum thermal deposition, resulting in the nonideal metal/semiconductor interfaces with diffusion, defects, chemical bonding, and strains, as have been demonstrated previously26,27 and schematically illustrated in Fig. 1e, f. The optical image of a typical fabricated device is shown Fig. 1g, where the left electrode pair is fabricated through thermal evaporation (highlighted by a black box) and the right electrode pair (red box) is vdW integrated. Electrical transport studies of the resulting devices were carried out at room temperature in a probe station under vacuum condition (3 × 10−5 Torr). As shown in Fig. 1h, a typical device (~7-nm thick) contacted with vdW metal electrodes shows p-type IdsVgs transfer characteristic, consistent with band alignment of WSe2 with high work function Au, suggesting the optimized Au/WSe2 interface using the vdW metal integration approach28,29,30. In contrast, without applying any doping process, n-type IdsVgs transfer characteristic is observed in the control device (fabricated on the same WSe2 flake) using conventional deposited Au contacts (Fig. 1i). The observed polarity change indicates the strong Fermi level pinning effect within evaporated Au/WSe2 interfaces, where the pinned Fermi level position is close to the conduction band of WSe2. Furthermore, the two-terminal FET mobility μ can be further extracted using equation μ = [dIds/dVgs] × [L/(WCVds)], where L/W is the ratio between channel length and width (shown in Fig. 1g), C is the back-gate capacitance (1.15 × 10−8 F cm−2, 300-nm-thick SiO2). The extracted hole and electron mobility in this device are 16 and 11 cm2 V−1 s−1, respectively. In addition, the contact resistance (Rc) and Schottky barrier height (SBH) of both p- and n-type transistors can also be extracted using the transfer line method and temperature-dependent measurement, where Rc and SBH are measured to be 14 kΩ μm, 50 meV for PMOS and 17 kΩ μm, 60 meV for NMOS, respectively, as shown in Supplementary Fig. 1. The balanced μ, Rc, and SBH between electrons and holes are important for the demonstration of high-performance CMOS circuit described below.

Fig. 1: Schematical illustration of device structure and electrical measurement.
figure1

ac Fabrication processes of WSe2 transistors using vdW integration processes: WSe2 flake exfoliated onto Si/SiO2 substrate (a); pre-fabricated Au electrodes physically laminated on WSe2 surface with weak vdW interaction (b, c). d The cross-sectional schematic of vdW contact with WSe2, demonstrating clean and sharp interfaces. e Au electrode evaporated on WSe2 using conventional thermal evaporation. f The cross-sectional schematics of evaporated contact with WSe2, demonstrating a highly disordered interface. g Optical image of a typical fabricated device with both evaporated (left pair, highlighted by a black box) and vdW-integrated (right pair, highlighted by a red box) electrodes on the same WSe2 flake (~7-nm thick). The scale bar is 5 μm. h, i The IdsVgs transfer characteristics of the WSe2 transistor (shown in g) using both vdW-integrated (h) and conventional evaporated electrodes (i). By controlling the metal integration approaches, the device polarity can be switched between p- and n-type, with a carrier mobility of 16 and 11 cm2 V−1 s−1 (at a bias of 1 V), respectively.

Thickness-dependent electrical measurement

To further confirm the robustness of this behavior and investigate the polarity control by using different metal integration processes, we have conducted detailed electrical measurement based on WSe2 of various thicknesses. As shown in Fig. 2a–c, the device contacted with vdW metal electrodes shows clearly p-type behavior, regardless of the WSe2 thickness, in consistent with the band alignment between WSe2 valance band (5.02–4.83 eV from monolayer to bulk) and high work function Au (5.24 eV). In great contrast, the control devices (contacted with conventional evaporated Au electrodes) display a unique polarity change behavior with increasing WSe2 thickness, demonstrating p-type characteristic with thickness <5 layers (~3 nm), a bipolar characteristic with 7 layers thick (~4.5 nm), and pronounced n-type property with thickness greater than 10 layers (~6.5 nm), as shown in Fig. 2d–f. The corresponding on–off ratio and mobility of these transistors (in Fig. 2a–f) and monolayer WSe2 transistor data (using both metal integration processes) are also plotted in Supplementary Fig. 2.

Fig. 2: Thickness-dependent electrical measurement of WSe2 transistors with vdW-integrated and evaporated Au electrodes.
figure2

ac, IdsVgs transfer curves of WSe2 with different thicknesses (3 layers in a, 7 layers in b, and 12 layers in c) using vdW Au electrodes, where p-type behavior is consistently observed. df IdsVgs transfer curves of WSe2 with different thicknesses (3 layers in d, 7 layers in e, and 12 layers in f) using conventional deposited Au electrodes, where p-type, bipolar, and n-type behaviors are observed in d, e, and f, respectively. The Vds bias voltage is 0.01 V (black), 0.1 V (red), 0.5 V (blue), and 1 V (brown) throughout af. g The current ratio between I−50V (Ids at Vg = −50 V) and I50V (Ids at Vg = 50 V) as a function of WSe2 thickness. For devices with vdW electrodes, large I−50V/I50V ratio >103 is observed, suggesting the consistent p-type behavior, regardless of the channel thickness. For devices with conventional evaporated Au electrodes, I−50V/I50V is decreased with increasing body thickness, where a p-type to n-type transition is clearly observed. The Vds bias voltage in g is fixed at 500 mV.

Furthermore, to confirm the robustness of this behavior and to quantitively analyze the polarity change, we have measured over 20 devices and extracted the current ratio between I−50V (Ids at Vg = −50 V) and I50V (Ids at Vg = 50 V) as a function of WSe2 thickness. The I−50V/I50V ratio here could represent the ratio between hole and electron contribution in a given transistor, and thus could quantitively demonstrate the transistor polarity and majority carrier type. For devices with vdW-contacted electrode (Fig. 2g, red dot), the I−50V/I50V ratio over 103 is consistently observed from monolayer to 30-nm- (~50 layers) thick devices, suggesting a dominated p-type behavior (with negligible electron current) regardless of body thickness. In contrast, for devices with conventional evaporated electrodes, the I−50V/I50V ratio decreased exponentially from 104 to ~10−3 (7 orders of magnitudes) with increasing body thickness from monolayer to ~50 layers, demonstrating that the majority carrier type can be progressively transformed from holes to electrons via increasing the thickness of WSe2. The slightly increased I−50V/I50V ratio for evaporated contacts (with thickness >13 nm, black line of Fig. 2g) could be attributed to the increased vertical resistance (under contact region) with increasing body thickness.

Moreover, the devices integrated by both vdW and evaporated electrodes are very stable, which can exhibit the original device polarity after 4 months of storage at room temperature in ambient atmosphere (Supplementary Fig. 3), further suggesting the stability of our doping-free approaches25,26. We also note that the unique device polarity control technique reported here is not only limited to WSe2 and Au metal, but could be extended to other 2D semiconductor–metal systems by using different contact integration processes to pin (using evaporated contact) or de-pin (using vdW contact) the Fermi level, as demonstrated in a MoS2–Pt system in Supplementary Fig. 4.

DFT simulation

To further understand the mechanism of polarity control by using different metal integration approaches, and to gain insight into the thickness dependent on PMOS to NMOS transition, we have carried out DFT simulation of carrier transport across the metal/WSe2 interfaces. First, we constructed two types of Au/WSe2 interface models, a close-contact model corresponding to the evaporated Au interface and a non-close contact corresponding to the vdW-integrated Au interface. For the close-contact model, an interlayer distance of 1.5 Å (covalent radius of Au and Se) was chosen between metal and WSe2, under which the Au and the Se atoms are covalently bonded. For the non-close-contact model, an interlayer distance of 3.3 Å was used, which included an additional vdW-gap distance of 1.8 Å on the base of close-contact interlayer distance, consistent with previous reports9. Based on this model, there are three interfaces that may contribute to the transport barrier: Au and the first layer WSe2 (interface I), WSe2 under the contact and inside the channel region (interface II), as well as the first layer WSe2 and the rest of the WSe2 layers (interface III), as illustrated in Fig. 3a, b.

Fig. 3: DFT calculation of Au/WSe2 interface with different contact approaches.
figure3

a, b Schematic cross-sectional view of the Au/WSe2 non-close-contact model (a) and the close-contact model (b). c Calculated band structures of WSe2 with different thickness (under Au contact) for the non-close-contact model. The red dots denote the projected band structures of WSe2 underlying the Au electrode, and the dots size represents the weights. d Variation of calculated SBH with WSe2 layer number for the non-close-contact model, where dominated p-type SBH is always observed. e Calculated band structures of different thickness of WSe2 under Au for the close-contact model. The red dots denote the projected band structures of WSe2 underlying the first layer WSe2, and the dot size represents the weights. f Variation of calculated SBH with WSe2 layer number for the close-contact model, with a clear transition from p- to n-type SBH with increasing layer thickness.

For the non-close contact, as the Au/WSe2 interlayer distance is large enough and their interlayer interaction is weak, Au electrode has little influence on the properties of WSe2. As shown in Supplementary Fig. 5, there are negligible interfacial gap states in WSe2, and the whole multilayer WSe2 maintains its intrinsic properties, leading to Ohmic contacts at interfaces II and III. Therefore, the contact Schottky barrier only exists in interface I, regardless of the thickness of WSe2 used. Figure 3c illustrates the calculated band structures of WSe2 under vdW Au contact, which is nearly the same with that of freestanding WSe2 (Supplementary Fig. 6), further indicating the weak interaction between Au electrode and the underlying WSe2. The calculated results of SBH are shown in Fig. 3d with dominating p-type Schottky barrier, consistent with observed p-type transistor behavior using vdW Au contact (Fig. 2a–c).

In great contrast, for evaporated Au with the close-contact model, chemical interaction exists between Au electrode and WSe2, which strongly perturbs the electrical properties of WSe2. As shown in Supplementary Fig. 7, a large number of interfacial states are generated in the forbidden band of WSe2, resulting in the disappearance of the WSe2 bandgap. Therefore, as demonstrated in Fig. 3b, the first layer of WSe2 is metalized under the contact (with a new work function ~4.83 eV), leading to an Ohmic contact at interface I. Meanwhile, Schottky barrier is generated at interfaces II and III during charge transport from metalized WSe2 (under contact) to semiconducting WSe2. For monolayer WSe2, the lateral Schottky barrier at interface II is p-type with a barrier height of 0.19 eV, as revealed by the calculated band alignments (Supplementary Fig. 8). On the other hand, for multilayer WSe2, the first underlying WSe2 is metalized, but the rest of the underlying layers remains largely intrinsic (Supplementary Fig. 9), and consequently the effect of Schottky barrier at interface III is more and more pronounced. As shown in Fig. 3e, f, the calculated vertical Schottky barriers at interface III are p-type when Au electrode contacts with 3-layer and 5-layer WSe2, and gradually switched to n-type with 7-layer and 9-layer WSe2, consistent with our measurement results in Fig. 2d–g. Figure 3f demonstrates the variation of SBH at interface III with layer number, with a detailed mechanism in Supplementary Fig. 10.

WSe2-based CMOS logic functions

The ability to control the transistor polarity can readily allow us to integrate multiple WSe2 transistors into functional circuits. For example, a complementary logic inverter can be achieved by connecting two WSe2 transistors in series, where one device is connected with deposited Au electrodes as n-type transistor and the other is contacted by vdW electrodes as a p-type device. The logic diagram and optical image of the inverter are shown in Fig. 4a, where the metal integration processes (both evaporation and vdW integrated) are the same as previous devices in Fig. 1, except that the back-gate dielectric is changed from 300-nm-thick SiO2 to 20-nm-thick Al2O3 to enhance the gate capacitance and electrostatic control over the channel, which is essential to reduce the inverter input voltage and to increase the voltage gain. The detailed inverter fabrication process is shown in the “Methods” section and Supplementary Fig. 11.

Fig. 4: CMOS logic functions based on WSe2 transistors with different contact approaches.
figure4

a Circuit diagram (upper) and optical image of a typical complementary inverter composed of two WSe2 transistors in series, where one is contacted with deposited Au electrodes (n-type) and another is contacted by vdW Au electrodes (p-type). Scale bar in the optical image is 4 μm. b The voltage transfer characteristics of the inverter as a function of the input voltage with different Vdd from 1.5 to 5.5 V (1-V step). c The corresponding voltage gains of the resulting inverter. d The bistable hysteresis voltage transfer characteristics of WSe2 CMOS logic inverter as a function of the input voltage (Vdd = 2.5 V), with the noise margin low (NML) of 1.16 V and noise margin high (NMH) of 1.19 V achieved. The VOH, VOL, VIL, and VIH represent the minimum high output voltage, maximum low output voltage, maximum low input voltage, and minimum high input voltage for the inverter, respectively. e The ratio of the total noise margin as a function of Vdd. f NAND and NOR circuit diagram composed of four WSe2 transistors, where two are contacted with deposited Au electrodes as n-type devices, and another two are contacted by vdW electrodes (p-type). g, h The input–output logic functions of NAND (g) and NOR (h) circuits. Gate voltage of −30 and 0 V is used as input “0” and “1”, respectively. Vds bias voltage is fixed at 0.23 V.

Figure 4b shows the voltage transfer characteristics of the resulting inverter as a function of input voltage with bias voltage (Vdd) from 1.5 to 5.5 V, demonstrating sharp voltage transition with input voltage. The resulted voltage gain is plotted in Fig. 4c with a peak value of 340 at Vdd = 5.5 V. To the best of our knowledge, the voltage gain reported here represents the highest value for TMD-based inverter, as shown in the comparison with previous literatures in Supplementary Table 1. Further increasing the Vdd leads to much increased gate leakage current, and degrades the overall device performance. The much higher voltage gain achieved here could be largely attributed to the optimized contact for both PMOS and NMOS by controlling their Fermi level position, which is intrinsically different compared with previous methods by evaporating metals with different work functions, where optimized contact to both PMOS and NMOS is hard to realize due to strong Fermi level pinning effect at metal/2D interfaces22,23,24,25. To characterize the robustness of an inverter fabricated through different contact approaches, we have extracted the noise margins (NML and NMH), as shown in Fig. 4d. At the Vdd of 2.5 V, NML of 1.16 V and NMH of 1.19 V are extracted. In addition, we also plot the total noise margin [(NML + NMH)/Vdd] as a function of Vdd from 1.5 to 5.5 V (Fig. 4e). The measured total noise margin of the inverter is greater than 90% at various bias voltages, indicating the high tolerance to noise. Furthermore, the static peak energy consumption of the corresponding inverter is also plotted in Supplementary Fig. 12.

Taking a step further, more complicated logic functions could be achieved by connecting more WSe2 transistors together. For example, a logic NOR or NAND function can be created using four multilayer WSe2 transistors, with two transistors using vdW Au contacts (p-type) and other two using evaporated Au contacts (n-type), as shown in the circuit diagram in Fig. 4f. The measured input and output voltages clearly demonstrate the desired logic function for the NOR and NAND (Fig. 4g, h), suggesting its potential for a more complex circuit.

Discussion

In summary, we have demonstrated a doping-free strategy to control the polarity of 2D transistors using the same contact metal Au and the same channel material WSe2, but different metal integration methods. Through detailed thickness-dependent measurement and DFT calculation, we found that the unique polarity change could be attributed to the controllable Fermi level pinning (or de-pinning) effect using different metal integration methods. Furthermore, with optimized contact to both PMOS and NMOS, we demonstrate a logic inverter with the highest voltage gain of 340 (at Vdd of 5.5 V) and the total noise margin over 90%, as well as more complex CMOS functions such as NAND and NOR. Our results not only demonstrate high-performance CMOS logic circuit, but also provide a method to control the polarity of a 2D semiconductor using the same contact metal, shedding light to high-performance 2D electronics and CMOS design.

Methods

Fabrication process of metal electrode for vdW integration

First, we prepared 50-nm-thick Au electrode arrays on sacrificial silicon substrate (with an atomically flat surface) using standard photolithography followed by thermal evaporation under vacuum (pressure ~5 × 104 Pa). After the lift-off process, the whole wafer was immersed in a sealed hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS) chamber to functionalize the surface of SiO2 at 80 °C. Next, the poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA A8, Mircochem Inc.) layer was spin-coated twice on the substrate with a speed of 3500 r.p.m. Finally, the 1-μm-thick PMMA layer with array Au electrodes is mechanically peeled and laminated to the target substrate via the mechanical aligner under an optical microscope26.

Inverter fabrication process

For fabricating logic inverter, we first prepared 10/50-nm-thick Ti/Au electrode onto an Si/SiO2 substrate as back-gate electrode. Next, the growth of a 20-nm-thick Al2O3 dielectric layer was employed through atomic layer deposition (ALD) on the gate electrode at the growth temperature of 150 °C. By contacting with vdW and evaporated electrode pairs, PMOS and NMOS devices can be achieved, as shown in Supplementary Fig. 11.

DFT computational methods

All the calculations were performed based on the DFT in conjunction with projector-augmented wave potentials, which is implemented in the Vienna ab initio Simulation Package (VASP)31,32. The generalized gradient approximation in the Perdew, Burke, and Ernzerhof (GGA–PBE) was used to describe the exchange and correlation potential33 as PBE bandgap is a good approximation for the transport gap in an FET, and accordingly the SBHs calculated by PBE are closer to the experimental value34,35. vdW interaction is taken into account by the DFT-D3 approach36, and the energy cutoff for plane waves was set at 450 eV. Geometry optimizations were terminated when the total energy and atomic force are less than 105 and 0.02 eV Å1, respectively. A Monkhorst–Pack k-point mesh of 9 × 9 × 1 was used for the calculation of Au/WSe2 interfaces. To avoid the interaction effect of adjacent slabs, the thickness of vacuum region was set to no less than 15 Å. The \(\sqrt 3 \times \sqrt 3\) unit cell of WSe2 and 2 × 2 unit cell of Au (111) faces were constructed to match with each other. As the properties of WSe2 are hypersensitive to strain, we adjusted the Au lattice parameter to be commensurable to that of WSe2. The strains applied on Au in all the Au/WSe2 interface models are less than 1%. To model the Au surface, we used six layers of Au atoms. Considering that the interface has little impact on the bottom several layers of Au atoms, the bottom three layers of Au atoms were fixed.

Material characterization and electrical measurement

The electrical characteristic measurements were characterized in a Lakeshore PS-100 cryogenic probe station at room temperature in vacuum, using Keysight B2900A source measurement unit (SMU). Besides, for the CMOS logic functions, the voltage transfer characteristics were measured using an Agilent B1500A Semiconductor Parameter Analyzer.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. 1.

    Radisavljevic, B. et al. Single-layer MoS2 transistors. Nat. Nanotechnol. 6, 147–150 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Wang, Q. H. et al. Electronics and optoelectronics of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat. Nanotechnol. 7, 699–712 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Sarkar, D. et al. A subthermionic tunnel field-effect transistor with an atomically thin channel. Nature 526, 91–95 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Liu, Y., Duan, X., Huang, Y. & Duan, X. Two-dimensional transistors beyond graphene and TMDCs. Chem. Soc. Rev. 47, 6388–6409 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Li, Z. et al. Efficient strain modulation of 2D materials via polymer encapsulation. Nat. Commun. 11, 1151 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Akinwande, D. et al. Graphene and two-dimensional materials for silicon technology. Nature 573, 507–518 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Haynes, T. E. et al. Interactions of ion-implantation induced interstitials with boron at high concentrations in silicon. Appl. Phys. Lett. 69, 1376 (1996).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Pandey, K. C. et al. Annealing of heavily arsenic-doped silicon: electrical deactivation and a new defect complex. Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 1282–1285 (1988).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Liu, Y., Huang, Y. & Duan, X. Van der Waals integration before and beyond two-dimensional materials. Nature 567, 323–333 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Shokouh, S. H. H. et al. High-gain subnanowatt power consumption hybrid complementary logic inverter with WSe2 nanosheet and ZnO nanowire transistors on glass. Adv. Mater. 27, 150–156 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Das, T. et al. Highly flexible hybrid CMOS inverter based on Si nanomembrane and molybdenum disulfide. Small 12, 5720–5727 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Xu, Y. et al. Field-induced n-doping of black phosphorus for CMOS compatible 2D logic electronics with high electron mobility. Adv. Funct. Mater. 27, 1702211 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Resta, G. V. et al. Doping-free complementary logic gates enabled by two-dimensional polarity-controllable transistors. ACS Nano 12, 7039–7047 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Liu, H. et al. Phosphorene: an unexplored 2D semiconductor with a high hole mobility. ACS Nano 8, 4033–4041 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Jeon, P. J. et al. Low power consumption complementary inverters with n-MoS2 and p-WSe2 dichalcogenide nanosheets on glass for logic and light-emitting diode circuits. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7, 22333–22340 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Sachid, A. B. et al. Monolithic 3D CMOS using layered semiconductors. Adv. Mater. 28, 2547–2554 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Du, Y. et al. Molecular doping of multilayer MoS2 field-effect transistors: reduction in sheet and contact resistances. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 34, 1328–1330 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Kiriya, D. et al. Air-stable surface charge transfer doping of MoS2 by benzyl viologen. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 7853–7856 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Yang, L. et al. Chloride molecular doping technique on 2D materials: WS2 and MoS2. Nano Lett. 14, 6275–6280 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Yu, L. et al. High-performance WSe2 complementary metal oxide semiconductor technology and integrated circuits. Nano Lett. 15, 4928–4934 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Lim, J. Y. et al. Homogeneous 2D MoTe2 p-n junctions and CMOS inverters formed by atomic-layer-deposition-induced doping. Adv. Mater. 29, 1701798 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Allain, A., Kang, J., Banerjee, K. & Kis, A. Electrical contacts to two-dimensional semiconductors. Nat. Mater. 14, 1195–1205 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Gong, C., Colombo, L., Wallace, R. M. & Cho, K. The unusual mechanism of partial fermi level pinning at metal-MoS2 interfaces. Nano Lett. 14, 1714–1720 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Kim, C. et al. Fermi level pinning at electrical metal contacts of monolayer molybdenum dichalcogenides. ACS Nano 11, 1588–1596 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Das, S., Chen, H. Y., Penumatcha, A. V. & Appenzeller, J. High performance multilayer MoS2 transistors with scandium contacts. Nano Lett. 13, 100–105 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Liu, Y. et al. Approaching the Schottky-Mott limit in van der Waals metal-semiconductor junctions. Nature 557, 696–700 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Jung, Y. et al. Transferred via contacts as a platform for ideal two-dimensional transistors. Nat. Electron. 2, 187–194 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Geim, A. K. & Grigorieva, I. V. Van der Waals heterostructures. Nature 499, 419–425 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Liu, Y., Stradins, P. & Wei, S.-H. Van der Waals metal-semiconductor junction: weak fermi level pinning enables effective tuning of Schottky barrier. Sci. Adv. 2, e1600069 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Liu, Y. et al. Van der Waals heterostructures and devices. Nat. Rev. Mater. 1, 16042 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comp. Mater. Sci. 6, 15–50 (1996).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Zhong, H. et al. Interfacial properties of monolayer and bilayer MoS2 contacts with metals: beyond the energy band calculations. Sci. Rep. 6, 21786 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Tang, H. et al. Schottky contact in monolayer WS2 field‐effect transistors. Adv. Theory Simul. 2, 1900001 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Klimeš, J., Bowler, D. R. & Michaelides, A. Chemical accuracy for the van der Waals density functional. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 22, 022201 (2009).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Y.L. acknowledges the financial support from National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51991340, 51991341, 51802090, and 61874041), the Hunan Science Fund for Excellent Young Scholars (Grant No. 812019037), and from Huxiang high level talent program (Grant No. S2018RSCXRC0149). L.F. acknowledges the financial support from National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11674265), from the Natural Science Basic Research Project of Shaanxi Province (Grant No. 2018JZ6003), and from Fundamental Research Funds of the Central Universities (3102019MS0402).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Y.L. conceived the research. Y.L. and L.K. designed the experiments. L.K. performed the sample fabrication and device measurement. X.Z. and L.F. contributed to DFT calculation. Z.L. contributed to the device schematic. L.L., M.Z., W.D., and Q.T. contributed to fabrication of the logic devices and the circuit measurements. X.D. contributed to paper editing. Y.L., L.F., and L.K. co-wrote the paper. All authors discussed the results and commented on the paper.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Liping Feng or Xiangfeng Duan or Yuan Liu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kong, L., Zhang, X., Tao, Q. et al. Doping-free complementary WSe2 circuit via van der Waals metal integration. Nat Commun 11, 1866 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15776-x

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter for a daily update on COVID-19 science.
Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing