Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

Principles of microscopy for ophthalmologists

Abstract

This short review begins with the theories of Airy, Rayleigh and Abbe on microscope resolution. Next, the principal developments in microscopy in the last half‐century are examined for relevance to ophthalmology: confocal microscopy, photoactivation light microscopy (PALM), stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM), stimulated emission depletion (STED), structured illumination (SI), 2‐photon and multiphoton excitation microscopy with a focused beam. Except for confocal, these are difficult to apply to the eye in vivo, as are the interference methods available in microscopes. However, interferometry in the form of coherence tomography is now a major ophthalmic method which has diverged from microscopy. Multiphoton excitation microscopy with an unfocussed beam is a new, low‐damage microscope method so‐far not exploited in ophthalmoscopy. The Mesolens, which throws off the historic limitations in microscopy set by the human eye, is described as a possible future aid to ophthalmology of the anterior eye.

摘要

此短篇综述从Airy、Rayleigh和Abbe关于显微镜分辨率的理论开始。随后, 我们阐述过去半个世纪显微镜的发展主线与眼科的相关性: 共聚焦显微镜、光激活显微镜 (PALM) 、随机光学重建显微镜 (STORM) 、受激发射耗尽显微镜 (STED) 、结构照明显微镜 (SI) 、聚焦光束的双光子和多光子激发显微镜。除了共聚焦显微镜外, 这些显微镜都很难在体内应用, 显微镜中可用的干涉方法也是如此。不过, 相干断层扫描形式的干涉测量法目前已成为一种主要的眼科方法, 并已从显微镜中分离出来。使用非聚焦光束的多光子激发显微镜是一种新型、低损伤的显微镜方法, 迄今为止尚未在眼科显微镜中得到应用。Mesolens 打破了人眼显微镜的历史局限性, 未来可能成为眼科前节的辅助性手段。

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Intensity variation across an Airy disk.
Fig. 2: Abbe’s method for obtaining highest resolution of a grating.
Fig. 3: Photograph of eyes of a spider, and the space between them.
Fig. 4: Variation with numerical aperture of the resolution of a lens in the normal sense (i.e. lateral) and in depth.
Fig. 5: Simplified diagram of a confocal laser‐scanning microscope.
Fig. 6: Comparison of fluorescence induced by single and 2‐photon excitation.
Fig. 7: Intensity profiles of pairs of just‐resolved objects as seen in the microscope image using a standard 10x eyepiece.
Fig. 8: Prof McConnell with the Mesolens system, equipped for confocal LSM or camera imaging.
Fig. 9: Mouse embryo fixed, stained with acridine orange and immersed in a high-refractive‐index fluid to render it transparent.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. White J, Amos W, Fordham M. 1987 an evaluation of confocal versus conventional imaging of biological structures by fluorescence light microscopy. J Cell Biol. 1987;105:41–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. La Rocca F, Dhalla A-H, Kelly MP, Farsui S, Isaat JA. Optimisation of confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope design. J Biomed Opt. 2013;18:076015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sheppard CJR. Scanning optical microscope. Electron Power. 1980;26:166–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Göppert‐Mayer M. Elementary processes with two quantum transitions. Ann Phys. 2009;521:466–479. https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.200952107‐804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Denk W, Strickler JH, Webb WW. Two-photon laser scanning fluorescence microscopy. Science. 1990;248:73–76.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Curley PA, Ferguson AI, White JG, Amos WB. Application of a femtosecond self-sustaining mode-locked Ti: sapphire laser to the field of laser scanning confocal microscopy. Optical Quantum Electron. 1992;24:851–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Henriques R, Griffiths C, Hesper Rego E Mhlanga, MMPalm and STORM: unlocking live cell superresolution. Biopolymers. 2011; https://doi.org/10.1002/bip.21586.

  8. Ma Y, Wen K, Liu M, Zheng J, Chu K, Smith Z. et al. Recent advances in structured illumination microscopy. J. Phys. Photon. 2021;3:024009. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7647/abdb04.

  9. Blom H, Widengren J. Stimulated emission depletion microscopy. Chem Rev. 2017;117:7377–427.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Aumann S, Donner S, Fischer J, Müller F, Chapter 3. Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Principles and Technical Realization pp 59‐85 in High Resolution Imaging in Microscopy and Ophthalmology ed. Bille JF, Springer.

  11. McConnell G, Trägårdh J, Amor R, Dempster J, Reid E, Amos B. A novel optical microscope for imaging large embryos and tissue volumes with sub-cellular resolution throughout. eLife. 2016; 5. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.18659.

  12. Airy GB. On the diffraction by an object-glass with circular aperture. Trans Camb Philos Soc. 1835;5:283–91.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Born M, Wolf E. Principles of Optics 6th edition 1980; Pp 396 and 440. Cambridge University Press.

  14. Lummer O, Reich F, Ernst Abbe’s Theory of Image Formation in the Microscope 1910; in translation by Yen A, Burkhardt M, with additional material 2022; SPIE Press.

  15. Legras RL, Gaudric A, Woog K. Distribution of cone density, spacing and arrangement in adult healthy retinas with adaptive optics flood illumination. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0191141. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191141.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Quin Z, He S, Yang C, Yung JS, Chen C, Leung CK, et al. Adaptive optics two-photon microscopy enables near-diffraction-limited and functional retinal imaging in vivo. Light: Sci Appl. 2020;9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-020-03.

  17. Amos B, McConnell G, Wilson T, Confocal Microscopy. In: Edward H. Egelman, editor: Comprehensive Biophysics, Vol 2, Biophysical Techniques for Characterization of Cells, ed Schwille, P. 2012; pp 3-23 Oxford: Academic Press ISBN: 978-0-12-374920-8.

  18. Zhang P, Wahl DJ, Mocci J, Miller EB, Bonora S, Sarunik MV, et al. Adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy and optical coherence tomography (AO-SLO-OCT) system for in vivo mouse retina imaging. Biomed Opt Express. 2022;14:299–314.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Wokosin DL, Centonze VE, Crittenden S, White J. Three-photon excitation fluorescence imaging of biological specimens using an all-solid-state laser. Bioimaging. 1996;4:208–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Avila FJ, Gambin A, Artal P, Bueno JM. In vivo two-photon microscopy of the human eye. Nat Com Sci Rep. 2019;9:10121.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Boguslawski J, Palczewska S, Tomczewski S, Milkiewicz J, Kasprzycki P, Stachowiak D, et al. In vivo imaging of the human eye using a 2-photon excited fluorescence scanning laser ophthalmoscope. J Clin Invest. 2022;132:e154218.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Amor R, Trägårdh J, Robb G, Wilson L, Rahman A, Nor Z, Dempster et al. Widefield Two-photon excitation without scanning: live cell microscopy with high time resolution and low photo-bleaching. 2014; PLOS ONE. 11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147115.

  23. Salmon ED, Tran P. High resolution video-enhanced differential interference contrast (VE-DIC) light microscopy. Methods Cell Biol. 1998;56:153–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Williams RM, Bloom JC, Robertus CM, Recknagel AK, Putnam D, Schimenti JC, et al. Practical strategies for robust and inexpensive imaging of aqueous-cleared tissues. J Microsc. 2023;291:237–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Westerheimer G, Visual Acuity. Chapter 17 in Adler’s Physiology of the Eye 9th edn. Ed. Hart WM, p 540 Mosby Year Book St Louis.

  26. https:// www.centreforbiophotonics.com/ (website of the Centre for Biophotonics, an Imaging Environment at the University of Strathclyde, Scotland).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This presentation was funded by an Emeritus Fellowship from the Leverhulme Foundation. I thank G. McConnell for making available an original dataset collected by Johanna Tragardh for the preparation of Fig. 9G. McConnell and E.J. Reid for advice on the text. I thank Dr Paul Meyer for the invitation to present this material at the 51st Cambridge Ophthalmological Symposium‐Engineering and the Eye at St John’s College, Cambridge 7 September 2023.

Funding

Leverhulme Trust - 91232 [AMOS] Based on a paper presented at the 51st Cambridge Ophthalmological Symposium‐Engineering and the Eye at St John’s College, Cambridge 7 September 2023 27.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William Bradshaw Amos.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

W.B. Amos is a director of Mesolens Ltd but has to date received no financial benefit or salary from the company. He has held an Emeritus Fellowship of the Leverhulme Foundation for research as a visiting Professor at the University of Strathclyde.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Amos, W.B. Principles of microscopy for ophthalmologists. Eye (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-024-02970-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-024-02970-0

Search

Quick links