Abstract
Mutations in N-glycanase 1 (NGLY1), which deglycosylates misfolded glycoproteins for degradation, can cause NGLY1 deficiency in patients and their abnormal fetal development in multiple organs, including microcephaly and other neurological disorders. Using cerebral organoids (COs) developed from human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) and induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs), we investigate how NGLY1 dysfunction disturbs early brain development. While NGLY1 loss had limited impact on the undifferentiated cells, COs developed from NGLY1-deficient hESCs showed defective formation of SATB2-positive upper-layer neurons, and attenuation of STAT3 and HES1 signaling critical for sustaining radial glia. Bulk and single-cell transcriptomic analysis revealed premature neuronal differentiation accompanied by downregulation of secreted and transcription factors, including TTR, IGFBP2, and ID4 in NGLY1-deficient COs. NGLY1 malfunction also dysregulated ID4 and enhanced neuronal differentiation in CO transplants developed in vivo. NGLY1-deficient CO cells were more vulnerable to multiple stressors; treating the deficient cells with recombinant TTR reduced their susceptibility to stress from proteasome inactivation, likely through LRP2-mediated activation of MAPK signaling. Expressing NGLY1 led to IGFBP2 and ID4 upregulation in CO cells developed from NGLY1-deficiency patient’s hiPSCs. In addition, treatment with recombinant IGFBP2 enhanced ID4 expression, STAT3 signaling, and proliferation of NGLY1-deficient CO cells. Overall, our discoveries suggest that dysregulation of stress responses and neural precursor differentiation underlies the brain abnormalities observed in NGLY1-deficient individuals.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
N-glycanase 1 (NGLY1) is a glycoenzyme that facilitates proteasome-mediated protein degradation by removing N-glycans from denatured glycoproteins [1,2,3,4,5]. Mutations in the NGLY1 gene can lead to dysfunctional NGLY1 and cause a congenital deglycosylation disorder, NGLY1 deficiency [5, 6]. Patients with NGLY1 deficiency often present with global developmental delay accompanied by neurological symptoms, including microcephaly [3, 5, 7, 8]. Similar to the patients, Ngly1-knockout rats exhibit multiple neuropathological phenotypes [9]. Flies and worms with defective NGLY1 orthologs also show developmental retardation and unusual axon branching [10,11,12,13]. Although the clinical findings and animal model phenotypes indicate a critical role NGLY1 plays in neurodevelopment and neurophysiology, how NGLY1 dysfunction causes neurodevelopmental abnormalities in a human-relevant system remains largely unknown.
Loss-of-function studies in different cell types have begun to uncover a few pathways by which NGLY1 modulates cellular activities. NGLY1 inactivation disrupts NFE2L1 function and potentiates proteasome inhibitor toxicity in myeloma cells [14]. NGLY1 deficiency also causes chronic impairment of mitochondrial and immune homeostasis in mouse fibroblasts and human lymphoblast-like cells [15]. Additionally, NGLY1 inactivation triggers stress response-mediated cell death and upregulation of anticancer interferons in human melanoma cells but not normal dermal fibroblasts [16]. These findings indicate that NGLY1 dysfunction could induce differential responses in cells, depending on their lineage, developmental stages, or perturbations to homeostasis.
While several animal models for NGLY1 deficiency exist, noticeable variability exhibits in observed neurodevelopment phenotypes across taxa [5, 6, 9, 10, 12, 17], suggesting that NGLY1-deficiency effects on human neurogenesis may not be fully recapitulated in animal-only models. A high similarity between human cerebral organoids (COs) and the human fetal neocortex at the transcriptomic level [18] qualifies COs as a relevant model for studying the molecular and cellular features of human cerebral development. Many seminal discoveries on the development, pathogenesis, and pharmacological responses of the central nervous system have been made using COs [19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30]. To understand defective neurodevelopment in NGLY1-deficient individuals, we seek to investigate how NGLY1 malfunction influences human cells undergoing neurogenesis modeled by COs.
Our work uncovers cellular and molecular alterations due to NGLY1 loss in COs developed from human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs). While viability and cellular pluripotency appear unaffected in NGLY1-deficient hPSCs, NGLY1 dysfunction substantially reduces upper-layer neurons in COs. Accompanied by enhanced stress susceptibility and differentiation propensity, secreted factor and neural stem cell (NSC) signaling in NGLY1-deficient CO cells is hindered in vitro and in vivo. Treatment with recombinant TTR and IGFBP2, two secreted factors highly reduced in NGLY1-deficient COs, promotes the tolerability of the deficient cells to bortezomib-induced proteotoxic stress and helps preserve their ID4 and STAT3 activities that are critical for maintaining NSCs during cerebral development.
Materials and methods
Cell culture
WA09-C3, -C4, and -C6 human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) were generated through CRISPR-Cas9-mediated editing of the NGLY1 gene in WA09 hESCs followed by single-cell cloning [16]. Human-induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) were established from NGLY1-deficiency patients’ fibroblasts (GM25990 and GM26607; Coriell Institute for Medical Research) using CytoTune Sendai Reprogramming Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Except using TeSR-E8 medium (Stemcell Technologies) and 2 mM EDTA passaging solution (Thermo Fisher Scientific), we generally followed the reported method [31] to culture undifferentiated hPSCs in a feeder cell-free condition. All the hPSCs were routinely subcultured when cell density reached 80% to 90%. The passage numbers of the hESCs and hiPSCs used in our studies spanned across 65–95 and 35–65, respectively. Additional information relevant to the cells was summarized in Table S1. The experiments using hPSCs were performed in compliance with the guidelines and approval of the institutional biosafety committee and embryonic stem cell research oversight committee. All cells were periodically tested using the MycoAlert mycoplasma detection kit (Lonza) and free of mycoplasma.
Whole-exome sequencing (WES)
WES followed by single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis was completed through a contracted service at Novogene. The experimental procedures were summarized in Supplementary Information.
Expression of exogenous NGLY1
A pLenti expression vector that carries a FLAG-tagged NGLY1 open reading frame (OriGene Technologies) was used for exogenous NGLY1 expression driven by a CMV promoter. An empty vector was used as the transduction control.
Embryoid body (EB) formation
The experimental procedure for non-directed cell differentiation in EBs was summarized in Supplementary Information.
CO formation
The protocol for CO formation was optimized in our reported study [32] and summarized in Supplementary Information.
Immunofluorescence staining
The general procedures for immunofluorescence staining were provided in Supplementary Information. Primary antibody information was summarized in Table S2.
Optical clearing, staining, and imaging in COs
The protocol for CUBIC (Clear, Unobstructed Brain/Body Imaging Cocktails and Computational) analysis was adopted from a previous study [33], optimized for COs, and summarized in Supplementary Information. Primary antibody information was summarized in Table S2.
Immunoblotting
The procedure was previously described [32]. Primary antibody information was summarized in Table S2.
Cell viability tests
The procedures were summarized in Supplementary Information.
Gene expression analysis by microarrays and qRT-PCR
The procedures were provided in Supplementary Information. The PluriTest [34] was used to test cellular pluripotency based on the transcriptomic features of cell samples.
Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq)
Cultrex organoid harvesting solution (R&D Systems) was used to release COs from residual Matrigel envelopes. The released COs were dissociated using a papain-based neural tissue dissociation kit on a gentleMACS dissociator (Miltenyi Biotec). The information of reagents and procedures for library preparation and sequencing based on the Chromium single-cell gene expression pipeline (10x Genomics) was summarized in Supplementary Information. The Seurat package [35] in R was used to analyze the filtered, aggregated, and depth-normalized transcript counts generated by the cellranger count and cellranger aggr scripts. Additional information for our sequencing data analysis was provided in Supplementary Information.
Proteomics analysis
The procedures for peptide mass spectrometry and data analysis were summarized in Supplementary Information.
In vivo studies
The surgical procedure for organoid transplantation was summarized in Supplementary Information. All animal studies were performed under approval from the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.
Statistical analysis
Quantitative data for each test were established from biological replicates (n ≥ 3) and presented as mean ± standard deviation. The sample size was chosen based on our experience in prior studies with similar experimental methods, where we frequently found samples of 3–5 replicates gave enough statistical power to detect a significant difference. The significance of differences was primarily determined by the two-tailed Student’s t-test for means between two groups or by the logistic regression for testing categorical variables.
Results
Cellular pluripotency and vitality remain intact in NGLY1-deficient hPSCs
NGLY1-deficient WA09-C3 and WA09-C4 cells (Fig. 1A) were generated by gene editing in WA09 hESCs with wild-type NGLY1 [16]. DNA sequencing confirmed their deletion mutations of the NGLY1 gene (Supplementary Fig. S1). While WA09-C6 hESCs also went through the editing process, they escaped from editing and retained NGLY1 expression comparable to that of parental cells (Fig. 1A). WA09-C3 and WA09-C4 hESCs were tested pluripotent by the PluriTest (Fig. 1B). They also formed EBs with differentiated cells relevant to three germ layers [16]. In addition, NGLY1 loss did not affect the overall vitality of undifferentiated WA09 hESCs (Fig. 1C).
NGLY1-deficiency patient’s fibroblasts were reprogrammed into hiPSCs [16]. The patient−derived hiPSCs, including NGLY1Pt1i-507, NGLY1Pt1i-508, NGLY1Pt1i-509, and NGLY1Pt2i-502 cells, expressed multiple markers for cellular pluripotency (Fig. 1D; Supplementary Fig. S2) [16]. They developed EBs with differentiated cells relevant to three germ layers (Fig. 1E; Supplementary Fig. S2) and were tested pluripotent also by the PluriTest (Fig. 1F). Through WES, we found the SNP profiles of our NGLY1-functional and -deficient hESCs are highly similar, clustered altogether, and distant from those of NGLY1-deficiency patient’s fibroblasts and hiPSCs (Fig. 1G). This result further supports that our NGLY1-functional and -deficient hESCs are virtually identical, except their NGLY1 conditions.
Upper-layer neuron formation and signaling critical for radial glia are disrupted in NGLY1-deficient COs
Using a protocol depicted in Fig. 2A, we generated COs from NGLY1-functional and -deficient hESCs (Fig. 2B). Having FOXG1-positive cells similarly present in both CO types (Fig. 2C) indicated that NGLY1 deficiency does not affect telencephalic commitment in neuroectoderm cells. However, compared with NGLY1-functional COs, the deficient ones appeared to have more BCL11B-positive deeper-layer neurons after 40-100 days of development (Fig. 2D, E). In contrast, SATB2-positive upper-layer neurons were significantly fewer in the deficient COs (Fig. 2D; Supplementary information, Vid. S1 and S2). These findings suggest that NGLY1 dysfunction may perturb migration and differentiation of progenitor cells into upper-layer neurons.
Because radial glial cells (RGCs) not only comprise cytoarchitectural scaffolding for cell migration and layering but also serve as progenitors that give rise to many different types of neurons in the developing brain [36,37,38], we examined the activity of STAT3 and HES1 that are critical for RGC maintenance [39, 40]. NGLY1 loss diminished STAT3 phosphorylation and HES1 expression in COs (Fig. 2E), suggesting that RGCs could be disturbed and prone to differentiation in response to NGLY1 malfunction.
NGLY1 dysfunction enhances a propensity for neuronal differentiation in COs
Gene expression in COs at multiple time points was profiled using microarrays. NGLY1 expression was found throughout a normal course of CO development, with relatively stable expression in the initial 30 days and followed by a moderate downregulation but preserved expression until 80 days (Fig. 3A). NGLY1-functional and -deficient hESCs downregulated POU5F1 and NANOG as well as upregulated PAX6 and FOXG1 in highly similar kinetics during CO formation (Supplementary Fig. S3), suggesting that NGLY1 dysfunction would not hinder differentiation of pluripotent cells and their telencephalic development. Differentially expressed genes due to NGLY1 dysfunction were found primarily in day-14 and -21 COs (Fig. 3B). Very few genes with significantly altered expression were identified in either the undifferentiated hESCs or day-80 COs with defective NGLY1 (Fig. 3B). These findings suggest that the dynamic transition of human cells as they exit the pluripotent state and commit to the neural lineage would be highly susceptible to NGLY1 deficiency. In addition, cells in a relatively mature or stable condition, such as differentiated neurons or undifferentiated hPSCs, may be less vulnerable to NGLY1 malfunction.
Among the differentially expressed genes between NGLY1-functional and -deficient COs throughout 80 days of development, genes associated with neuronal differentiation and patterning, including POU3F1, HESX1, DMRT3, DMRTA2, FEZF2, and NEUROD6, were significantly upregulated more in NGLY1-deficient COs, while several NSC-relevant genes, such as SLIT2, STMN4, RTN1, and LIN28, were further downregulated (Fig. 3B). Compared with NGLY1-functional COs, the deficient COs at day 35 also had significant downregulation of genes, such as HK2, SLC2A1, PGK1, and TPI1 (Fig. 3B), that are known to be downregulated during metabolic transition in neurons as they differentiate from progenitors [41]. After 2-month development, the expression of a post-mitotic neuronal marker, NEUROD2, was higher in the NGLY1-deficient COs (Fig. 3C). When we examined six marker genes that are frequently used to identify neuronal differentiation, NGLY1-deficient COs began to express these markers earlier (Supplementary Fig. S4). Taken together, NGLY1-deficient human cells undergoing neurogenesis are likely to prematurely differentiate and have enhanced neuron formation.
NGLY1 dysfunction alters stress susceptibility of CO and EB cells
Having observed ATF4 and GADD153 activation in NGLY1-suppressed melanoma cells [16], we tested whether the relevant signaling similarly alters in NGLY1-deficient COs. While NGLY1 malfunction appeared to upregulate ATF4 in WA09 COs, this upregulation was moderate, compared with that in NGLY1-knockdown melanoma cells (Fig. 3D). Unlike NGLY1-knockdown melanoma cells, NGLY1-deficient COs showed undetectable GADD153 protein (Fig. 3D). Several other genes that are also involved in stress response signaling and significantly induced in NGLY1-knockdown melanoma cells [16] were not upregulated in NGLY1-deficient COs. Despite the discrepancy between CO and melanoma cells in response to NGLY1 loss, NGLY1-deficient CO cells, compared with the functional ones, showed higher susceptibility to either bortezomib, glutamate, hydrogen peroxide, or thapsigargin (Fig. 4A–D). In contrast, they tolerated cisplatin treatment and glucose deprivation better than NGLY1-functional CO cells (Fig. 4E, F).
To test whether enhanced NGLY1 expression increases stress tolerability in developing cells, we expressed NGLY1 in cells isolated from EBs and COs of NGLY1-deficiency patient’s hiPSCs before pharmacologically stressing them. Expression of exogenous NGLY1 in the EB and CO cells attenuated bortezomib- and hydrogen peroxide−induced reduction of viability (Fig. 4G–I; Supplementary Fig. S5). Thus, altering NGLY1 activity could substantially affect the susceptibility and responses of developing human cells to stress.
Premature differentiation of NSCs and perturbation of secreted factors discovered by single-cell analysis in NGLY1-deficient COs
COs developed from NGLY1-functional and -deficient hESCs, as well as patient-derived hiPSCs with and without NGLY1 overexpression (Fig. 5A), were examined by scRNA-seq to molecularly phenotype cells at high resolution and determine cell types affected by NGLY1-deficient neurodevelopment. Each CO sample resulted in ~4500 analyzable single cells (Fig. 5B, left panel). Most day-80 CO cells showed transcriptomic features that separate them away from day-40 CO cells (Fig. 5B, right panel), suggesting that the cellular components of day-40 and -80 COs are fundamentally different due to developmental progression.
Based on the expression profiles of 60 marker genes (Fig. 5C), 14 neural cell types together with choroid plexus and mesenchymal cells in our COs were identified (Fig. 5D; Supplementary Fig. S6A, B). Given the negligible number of cells with hPSC features (Fig. 5E), cell differentiation was effective in COs. Day-40 COs largely consisted of primitive NSCs, choroid plexus, and mesenchymal cells, while day-80 COs were enriched by definitive NSCs, intermediate progenitor cells (IPCs), and cortical neurons (CNs) (Fig. 5B, D). Primitive NSCs with a higher degree of differentiation were found more in NGLY1-deficient COs compared with the functional ones (Fig. 5D, E). Similarly, NGLY1-deficient COs contained more differentiated CNs and fewer definitive NSCs (Fig. 5D, E). NGLY1-deficient COs at day 80, compared with the functional ones, also had higher abundances of TUBB3 and MAP2 proteins (Supplementary Fig. S7). These findings attest to NSC depletion and premature neuronal differentiation during neurogenesis without functional NGLY1.
TTR was the top downregulated gene in NGLY1-deficient COs (Fig. 5F). NGLY1 dysfunction in CO cells also hindered their expression of IGFBP2 and ID4 genes (Fig. 5F) that are involved in NSC maintenance during brain development [42,43,44,45,46]. Consistent with the RNA-seq results, TTR, IGFBP2, and ID4 proteins were reduced in NGLY1-deficient COs (Fig. 5G). In addition, HSPA8 and ISG15 expression that is associated with responses to multiple stress types [47, 48] was significantly changed in a few cell types of NGLY1-deficient COs (Supplementary Fig. S6C). Contrary to elevated ISG15 in NGLY1-deficiency patients’ lymphoblastoid cells [15], it was downregulated in human CO cells with dysfunctional NGLY1. After transplanting day-15 neuroepithelial spheres into the mouse cerebral cortex for an additional 50 days of in vivo development, NGLY1-deficient transplants hardly contained ID4-positive cells, in contrast to the functional counterparts with many ID4-positive cells (Supplementary Fig. S8). We also observed more RBFOX3-positive human neurons in the deficient transplants (Supplementary Fig. S8). Thus, perturbation of ID4 expression and neuronal differentiation due to NGLY1 dysfunction in COs can occur under a physiological condition and remain affected in a non-embryonic intracerebral environment with a normal NGLY1 ortholog in presence.
Treatment with recombinant TTR and IGFBP2 enhances stress tolerability, NSC signaling, and proliferation that NGLY1 dysfunction attenuates in CO cells
By treating NGLY1-deficient CO cells with recombinant TTR and IGFBP2, we tested whether these secreted factors may alleviate NGLY1 deficiency-induced cellular abnormalities in neurogenesis. Because TTR can activate MAPK signaling through an LRP2 receptor-dependent mechanism and has been implicated in protecting stressed neurons [49], we examined ERK phosphorylation in CO cells with and without TTR treatment. Compared with NGLY1-functional CO cells, the deficient cells had reduced ERK phosphorylation (Fig. 6A, top panel). Treatment with TTR in both types of CO cells with similar LRP2 expression (Fig. 6A, bottom left panel) enhanced ERK phosphorylation (Fig. 6A, top and bottom right panels). TTR treatment-induced phosphorylation of ERK can be suppressed by co-treatment of recombinant LRPAP, an inhibitor for ligand binding to LDL receptor-related proteins (LRPs), in CO cells (Fig. 6A, top panel). While LRPAP treatment potentiated bortezomib toxicity in NGLY1-deficient CO cells, TTR treatment increased their tolerability (Fig. 6B).
The NGLY1 overexpression-induced concomitant upregulation of IGFBP2 and ID4 in NGLY1-deficiency patients’ CO cells (Fig. 6C; Supplementary Fig. S6D, E) indicated that ID4 expression modulated by NGLY1 may be coupled to IGFBP2 activity. Notably, treatment with recombinant IGFBP2 elevated ID4 in NGLY1-deficient CO cells (Fig. 6D). STAT3 phosphorylation was also enhanced in the NGLY1-deficient cells with IGFBP2 treatment (Fig. 6E). Moreover, patients’ CO cells showed ID4 upregulation and became more proliferative in response to IGFBP2 treatment (Fig. 6D, F, G). These findings suggest that NGLY1 may sustain the signaling and expansion of NSCs in the developing brain, at least partially, through maintaining IGFBP2 expression.
Discussion
We delineated cellular and molecular features of NGLY1-defective human neurogenesis. In light of reduced upper-layer neurons (Fig. 2D) and attenuation of STAT3 and HES1 signaling critical for maintaining RGCs [39, 40] (Fig. 2E), NGLY1 malfunction could interfere with the functions of RGCs and other NSCs in human COs. Through bulk and single-cell transcriptomic analysis, we had direct evidence for the major impact of defective NGLY1 on neural precursors and their differentiation propensity (Figs. 3B and 5E). Considering the transcriptomic similarity between human COs and the fetal neocortex [18], NGLY1 loss−associated gene expression alterations in the COs likely show in the human NGLY1-dysfunctional fetal brain. Thus, NGLY1 deficiency could affect neural precursors and subsequently hinder the migration and development of upper-layer neurons in the human developing cerebrum. Similar to the enhanced propensity for neuronal differentiation we observed in NGLY1-deficient COs, another recent study that analyzed several cell types, including hiPSC-differentiated NPCs, from NGLY1-deficient patients also found gene expression relevant to neuron commitment and axonogenesis is significantly enriched in NGLY1-deficient NPCs compared to the functional ones [50].
Unlike melanoma cells, CO cells showed limited upregulation of ATF4 and GADD153 in response to NGLY1 loss (Fig. 3D), suggesting that NGLY1 dysfunction may cause distinct types or levels of stress in different cells. Although surprising, hyperactivation of stress response signaling does not appear a major cause of alterations in NGLY1-deficient human COs. Like our findings, wild-type and Ngly1-knockout rats have no detectable difference in the expression of ER stress markers [9]. Using various stressors (Fig. 4A–D), we demonstrated lower tolerability to proteotoxicity, excitotoxicity, oxidative stress, and ER stress in developing neural cells with dysfunctional NGLY1. However, those cells also appeared less sensitive to cisplatin and glucose deprivation (Fig. 4E, F). While additional studies are required to confirm our speculation, the higher tolerability to cisplatin and glucose starvation may be attributed to reduced cell proliferation because of premature differentiation in NGLY1-deficient COs. Concordant with the enhanced self-renewal in neural progenitors stimulated with hydrogen peroxide [51], treatment with low-dose hydrogen peroxide promoted proliferation of normal CO cells (Fig. 4C) that are composed of many progenitors. This proliferative response was abolished in NGLY1-defective CO cells (Fig. 4C), also suggesting that NGLY1 deficiency could substantially alter progenitor properties in the developing brain.
Our scRNA-seq analysis demonstrated NSC depletion accompanied by increased CNs due to NGLY1 loss in COs (Fig. 5C–E). Except for a few genes (Fig. 5F; Supplementary Fig. S6C), transcriptomic features in CNs with and without NGLY1 were largely similar. While understanding how NGLY1 loss may impact different CNs requires further investigation, gene expression relevant to vital activities in differentiated CNs seems mostly unaffected. Through the same analysis, significant downregulation of TTR due to NGLY1 loss in COs was identified (Fig. 5F, G). TTR makes up 25% of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) protein [52]. Notably, most NGLY1-deficient children have total protein concentrations in their CSF below the normal range [6]. These findings indicate that TTR could be reduced and insufficient for normal development and function in the NGLY1-deficient brain. Besides facilitating thyroxin and retinol transportation in the body [53], TTR contributes to neuroprotection under ischemic stress via LRP2 binding and MAPK signaling activation [49, 54]. TTR also protects neurons from the proteotoxicity of amyloidogenic peptides [55,56,57,58]. While TTR reduction may also cause neural-specific hypothyroidism whereby prenatal and postnatal brain development can be stunted [59], our data from TTR and LRPAP treatment in NGLY1-deficient CO cells exposed to bortezomib (Fig. 6A, B) indicated that TTR downregulation due to NGLY1 malfunction could impair LRP2-mediated neuroprotection and subsequently affect stress tolerability in developing neural cells.
In addition to TTR, IGFBP2 and ID4 were highly reduced in NGLY1-deficient COs (Fig. 5F, G). NGLY1 loss also disturbed the kinetics of IGFBP2 and ID4 expression (Supplementary Fig. S9). Because IGFBP2 and ID4 maintain NSCs as well as regulate cerebral and cognitive development [44,45,46, 60], IGFBP2 and ID4 dysregulation during NGLY1-defective cortical development could limit proliferation and cause premature differentiation in NSCs, which may underlie microcephaly in NGLY1-deficiency patients. Notably, robust expression of ID4 in the human fetal brain starts from Carnegie stage 13 and persists during gestational weeks 6–10 [61]. Knowing ID4 downregulation in NGLY1-defective COs, the expression pattern of ID4 in the human fetal brain could be unsustainable under NGLY1 deficiency. Among four ID genes expressed in human cells, the expression of ID4, but not others, noticeably differed in response to NGLY1 loss (Supplementary Fig. S9). Thus, although all ID genes contribute to regulating embryogenesis [62, 63], NGLY1 deficiency appears to affect cerebral development particularly through disrupting ID4 function. With IGFBP2 treatment, NGLY1-deficient CO cells showed elevated ID4 expression, STAT3 phosphorylation, and proliferation (Fig. 6D–G). Aside from modulating insulin-like growth factors, IGFBP2 can activate MAPK and STAT3 signaling through integrin β1- and EGFR-dependent mechanisms [64, 65]. Collectively, IGFBP2 dysregulation could be a major cause of the molecular and phenotypic changes in NGLY1-deficient NSCs and underlie patients’ neurological defects.
NGLY1-mediated deglycosylation is known to facilitate retrotranslocation and degradation of misfolded BMP4, thereby allowing properly-folded BMP4 to proceed through the secretory pathway and activate signaling [66]. Ngly1-mutant mouse embryos also present a severe decrease in BMP signaling in certain contexts [66]. Our discoveries on TTR and IGFBP2 downregulation together with the reported dysregulation of BMP4 in NGLY1-defective cells suggest that NGLY1 deficiency could perturb many secreted factors needed for normal development. Of note, ID4 mediates the BMP4-induced inhibition of neuroprogenitor differentiation and lineage commitment [67, 68]. Because BMPs play a critical role in development and patterning of the central nervous system [69], whether BMP4 disruption is linked to ID4 downregulation in NGLY1-deficient cells and also contributes to abnormal cerebral development should be tested in the future.
Interestingly, expression of NGLY1 without deglycosylation activity appears to rescue the Ngly1-dependent function of transcriptional factors Creb1 and Atf1 in Ngly1-knockout mouse fibroblasts [70]. These data suggest NGLY1 could be capable of transcriptional regulation that is independent of its deglycosylation function. Given many transcription factors that are specifically expressed during neurogenesis and modulate NSC behavior, future work to delineate if the deglycosylation-independent action of NGLY1 affects transcriptional regulation in NSCs may lead to novel and important discoveries about NGLY1 in the context of neurodevelopment.
Overall, our study demonstrates the significant role of NGLY1 during neurogenesis in human COs, offers mechanistic insights into NGLY1-deficiency patients’ neurodevelopmental abnormalities, and reveals potential targets that we can further investigate to ultimately alleviate the disease phenotypes.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Data availability
The microarray and scRNA-seq data have been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) with accession numbers GSE169696 and GSE142143, respectively. The mass spectrometry data for proteomics analysis have been deposited in the ProteomeXchange with an identifier PXD026681.
References
Huang C, Harada Y, Hosomi A, Masahara-Negishi Y, Seino J, Fujihira H, et al. Endo-beta-N-acetylglucosaminidase forms N-GlcNAc protein aggregates during ER-associated degradation in Ngly1-defective cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112:1398–403.
Caglayan AO, Comu S, Baranoski JF, Parman Y, Kaymakcalan H, Akgumus GT, et al. NGLY1 mutation causes neuromotor impairment, intellectual disability, and neuropathy. Eur J Med Genet. 2015;58:39–43.
Need AC, Shashi V, Hitomi Y, Schoch K, Shianna KV, McDonald MT, et al. Clinical application of exome sequencing in undiagnosed genetic conditions. J Med Genet. 2012;49:353–61.
Suzuki T. The cytoplasmic peptide:N-glycanase (Ngly1)-basic science encounters a human genetic disorder. J Biochem. 2015;157:23–34.
Enns GM, Shashi V, Bainbridge M, Gambello MJ, Zahir FR, Bast T, et al. Mutations in NGLY1 cause an inherited disorder of the endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation pathway. Genet Med. 2014;16:751–8.
Lam C, Ferreira C, Krasnewich D, Toro C, Latham L, Zein WM, et al. Prospective phenotyping of NGLY1-CDDG, the first congenital disorder of deglycosylation. Genet Med. 2017;19:160–8.
Might M, Wilsey M. The shifting model in clinical diagnostics: how next-generation sequencing and families are altering the way rare diseases are discovered, studied, and treated. Genet Med. 2014;16:736–7.
Kariminejad A, Shakiba M, Shams M, Namiranian P, Eghbali M, Talebi S, et al. NGLY1 deficiency: Novel variants and literature review. Eur J Med Genet. 2021;64:104146.
Asahina M, Fujinawa R, Nakamura S, Yokoyama K, Tozawa R, Suzuki T. Ngly1 -/- rats develop neurodegenerative phenotypes and pathological abnormalities in their peripheral and central nervous systems. Hum Mol Genet. 2020;29:1635–47.
Habibi-Babadi N, Su A, de Carvalho CE, Colavita A. The N-glycanase png-1 acts to limit axon branching during organ formation in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Neurosci. 2010;30:1766–76.
Rodriguez TP, Mast JD, Hartl T, Lee T, Sand P, Perlstein EO. Defects in the neuroendocrine axis contribute to global development delay in a Drosophila model of NGLY1 deficiency. G3. 2018;8:2193–204.
Galeone A, Han SY, Huang C, Hosomi A, Suzuki T, Jafar-Nejad H. Tissue-specific regulation of BMP signaling by Drosophila N-glycanase 1. eLife. 2017;6:e27612.
Owings KG, Lowry JB, Bi Y, Might M, Chow CY. Transcriptome and functional analysis in a Drosophila model of NGLY1 deficiency provides insight into therapeutic approaches. Hum Mol Genet. 2018;27:1055–66.
Tomlin FM, Gerling-Driessen UIM, Liu YC, Flynn RA, Vangala JR, Lentz CS, et al. Inhibition of NGLY1 inactivates the transcription factor Nrf1 and potentiates proteasome inhibitor cytotoxicity. ACS Cent Sci. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.1027b00224.
Yang K, Huang R, Fujihira H, Suzuki T, Yan N. N-glycanase NGLY1 regulates mitochondrial homeostasis and inflammation through NRF1. J Exp Med. 2018;215:2600–16.
Zolekar A, Lin VJT, Mishra NM, Ho YY, Hayatshahi HS, Parab A, et al. Stress and interferon signalling-mediated apoptosis contributes to pleiotropic anticancer responses induced by targeting NGLY1. Br J Cancer. 2018;119:1538–51.
Fujihira H, Masahara-Negishi Y, Tamura M, Huang C, Harada Y, Wakana S, et al. Lethality of mice bearing a knockout of the Ngly1-gene is partially rescued by the additional deletion of the Engase gene. PLoS Genet. 2017;13:e1006696.
Camp JG, Badsha F, Florio M, Kanton S, Gerber T, Wilsch-Brauninger M, et al. Human cerebral organoids recapitulate gene expression programs of fetal neocortex development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112:15672–7.
Bershteyn M, Nowakowski TJ, Pollen AA, Di Lullo E, Nene A, Wynshaw-Boris A, et al. Human iPSC-derived cerebral organoids model cellular features of lissencephaly and reveal prolonged mitosis of outer radial glia. Cell Stem Cell. 2017;20:435–49 e434.
Dakic V, Minardi Nascimento J, Costa Sartore R, Maciel RM, de Araujo DB, Ribeiro S, et al. Short term changes in the proteome of human cerebral organoids induced by 5-MeO-DMT. Sci Rep. 2017;7:12863.
Lancaster MA, Renner M, Martin CA, Wenzel D, Bicknell LS, Hurles ME, et al. Cerebral organoids model human brain development and microcephaly. Nature. 2013;501:373–9.
Lee CT, Chen J, Kindberg AA, Bendriem RM, Spivak CE, Williams MP, et al. CYP3A5 mediates effects of cocaine on human neocorticogenesis: studies using an in vitro 3D self-organized hPSC model with a single cortex-like unit. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2017;42:774–84.
Pasca AM, Sloan SA, Clarke LE, Tian Y, Makinson CD, Huber N, et al. Functional cortical neurons and astrocytes from human pluripotent stem cells in 3D culture. Nat Methods. 2015;12:671–8.
Pollen AA, Bhaduri A, Andrews MG, Nowakowski TJ, Meyerson OS, Mostajo-Radji MA, et al. Establishing cerebral organoids as models of human-specific brain evolution. Cell. 2019;176:743–56 e717.
Velasco S, Kedaigle AJ, Simmons SK, Nash A, Rocha M, Quadrato G, et al. Individual brain organoids reproducibly form cell diversity of the human cerebral cortex. Nature. 2019;570:523–7.
Watanabe M, Buth JE, Vishlaghi N, de la Torre-Ubieta L, Taxidis J, Khakh BS, et al. Self-organized cerebral organoids with human-specific features predict effective drugs to combat Zika virus infection. Cell Rep. 2017;21:517–32.
Zhang W, Yang SL, Yang M, Herrlinger S, Shao Q, Collar JL, et al. Modeling microcephaly with cerebral organoids reveals a WDR62-CEP170-KIF2A pathway promoting cilium disassembly in neural progenitors. Nat Commun. 2019;10:2612.
Trujillo CA, Muotri AR. Brain organoids and the study of neurodevelopment. Trends Mol Med. 2018;24:982–90.
Quadrato G, Nguyen T, Macosko EZ, Sherwood JL, Min Yang S, Berger DR, et al. Cell diversity and network dynamics in photosensitive human brain organoids. Nature. 2017;545:48–53.
Kanton S, Boyle MJ, He Z, Santel M, Weigert A, Sanchis-Calleja F, et al. Organoid single-cell genomic atlas uncovers human-specific features of brain development. Nature. 2019;574:418–22.
Wang YC, Nakagawa M, Garitaonandia I, Slavin I, Altun G, Lacharite RM, et al. Specific lectin biomarkers for isolation of human pluripotent stem cells identified through array-based glycomic analysis. Cell Res. 2011;21:1551–63.
Lin VJT, Hu J, Yan L-J, Zolekar A, Wang Y-C. Urine sample-derived cerebral organoids suitable for studying neurodevelopment and pharmacological responses. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020;8:304.
Susaki EA, Tainaka K, Perrin D, Yukinaga H, Kuno A, Ueda HR. Advanced CUBIC protocols for whole-brain and whole-body clearing and imaging. Nat Protoc. 2015;10:1709–27.
Muller FJ, Schuldt BM, Williams R, Mason D, Altun G, Papapetrou EP, et al. A bioinformatic assay for pluripotency in human cells. Nat Methods. 2011;8:315–7.
Butler A, Hoffman P, Smibert P, Papalexi E, Satija R. Integrating single-cell transcriptomic data across different conditions, technologies, and species. Nat Biotechnol. 2018;36:411–20.
Campbell K, Gotz M. Radial glia: multi-purpose cells for vertebrate brain development. Trends Neurosci. 2002;25:235–8.
Kriegstein A, Alvarez-Buylla A. The glial nature of embryonic and adult neural stem cells. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2009;32:149–84.
Malatesta P, Gotz M. Radial glia - from boring cables to stem cell stars. Development. 2013;140:483–6.
Ohtsuka T, Sakamoto M, Guillemot F, Kageyama R. Roles of the basic helix-loop-helix genes Hes1 and Hes5 in expansion of neural stem cells of the developing brain. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:30467–74.
Pollen AA, Nowakowski TJ, Chen J, Retallack H, Sandoval-Espinosa C, Nicholas CR, et al. Molecular identity of human outer radial glia during cortical development. Cell. 2015;163:55–67.
Zheng X, Boyer L, Jin M, Mertens J, Kim Y, Ma L, et al. Metabolic reprogramming during neuronal differentiation from aerobic glycolysis to neuronal oxidative phosphorylation. eLife. 2016;5:e13374.
Khan S. IGFBP-2 signaling in the brain: from brain development to higher order brain functions. Front Endocrinol. 2019;10:822.
Li T, Forbes ME, Fuller GN, Li J, Yang X, Zhang W. IGFBP2: integrative hub of developmental and oncogenic signaling network. Oncogene. 2020;39:2243–57.
Shen F, Song C, Liu Y, Zhang J, Wei Song S. IGFBP2 promotes neural stem cell maintenance and proliferation differentially associated with glioblastoma subtypes. Brain Res. 2019;1704:174–86.
Bedford L, Walker R, Kondo T, van Cruchten I, King ER, Sablitzky F. Id4 is required for the correct timing of neural differentiation. Developmental Biol. 2005;280:386–95.
Yun K, Mantani A, Garel S, Rubenstein J, Israel MA. Id4 regulates neural progenitor proliferation and differentiation in vivo. Development. 2004;131:5441–8.
Kaushik S, Cuervo AM. The coming of age of chaperone-mediated autophagy. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2018;19:365–81.
Sandy Z, da Costa IC, Schmidt CK. More than meets the ISG15: emerging roles in the DNA damage response and beyond. Biomolecules. 2020;10:1557.
Gomes JR, Nogueira RS, Vieira M, Santos SD, Ferraz-Nogueira JP, Relvas JB, et al. Transthyretin provides trophic support via megalin by promoting neurite outgrowth and neuroprotection in cerebral ischemia. Cell Death Differ. 2016;23:1749–64.
Rauscher B, Mueller WF, Clauder-Munster S, Jakob P, Islam MS, Sun H, et al. Patient-derived gene and protein expression signatures of NGLY1 deficiency. J Biochem. 2021, https://doi.org/10.1093/jb/mvab131.
Le Belle JE, Orozco NM, Paucar AA, Saxe JP, Mottahedeh J, Pyle AD, et al. Proliferative neural stem cells have high endogenous ROS levels that regulate self-renewal and neurogenesis in a PI3K/Akt-dependant manner. Cell Stem Cell. 2011;8:59–71.
Aldred AR, Brack CM, Schreiber G. The cerebral expression of plasma protein genes in different species. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol. 1995;111:1–15.
Oliveira SM, Cardoso I, Saraiva MJ. Transthyretin: roles in the nervous system beyond thyroxine and retinol transport. Expert Rev Endocrinol Metab. 2012;7:181–9.
Santos SD, Lambertsen KL, Clausen BH, Akinc A, Alvarez R, Finsen B, et al. CSF transthyretin neuroprotection in a mouse model of brain ischemia. J Neurochem. 2010;115:1434–44.
Buxbaum JN, Ye Z, Reixach N, Friske L, Levy C, Das P, et al. Transthyretin protects Alzheimer’s mice from the behavioral and biochemical effects of Abeta toxicity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:2681–6.
Silva CS, Eira J, Ribeiro CA, Oliveira A, Sousa MM, Cardoso I, et al. Transthyretin neuroprotection in Alzheimer’s disease is dependent on proteolysis. Neurobiol Aging. 2017;59:10–14.
Stein TD, Johnson JA. Lack of neurodegeneration in transgenic mice overexpressing mutant amyloid precursor protein is associated with increased levels of transthyretin and the activation of cell survival pathways. J Neurosci. 2002;22:7380–8.
Stein TD, Anders NJ, DeCarli C, Chan SL, Mattson MP, Johnson JA. Neutralization of transthyretin reverses the neuroprotective effects of secreted amyloid precursor protein (APP) in APPSW mice resulting in tau phosphorylation and loss of hippocampal neurons: support for the amyloid hypothesis. J Neurosci. 2004;24:7707–17.
Monk JA, Sims NA, Dziegielewska KM, Weiss RE, Ramsay RG, Richardson SJ. Delayed development of specific thyroid hormone-regulated events in transthyretin null mice. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2013;304:E23–31.
Khan S, Lu X, Huang Q, Tang J, Weng J, Yang Z, et al. IGFBP2 plays an essential role in cognitive development during early life. Adv Sci. 2019;6:1901152.
Eze UC, Bhaduri A, Haeussler M, Nowakowski TJ, Kriegstein AR. Single-cell atlas of early human brain development highlights heterogeneity of human neuroepithelial cells and early radial glia. Nat Neurosci. 2021;24:584–94.
Jen Y, Manova K, Benezra R. Expression patterns of Id1, Id2, and Id3 are highly related but distinct from that of Id4 during mouse embryogenesis. Dev Dyn. 1996;207:235–52.
Jen Y, Manova K, Benezra R. Each member of the Id gene family exhibits a unique expression pattern in mouse gastrulation and neurogenesis. Dev Dyn. 1997;208:92–106.
Chua CY, Liu Y, Granberg KJ, Hu L, Haapasalo H, Annala MJ, et al. IGFBP2 potentiates nuclear EGFR-STAT3 signaling. Oncogene. 2016;35:738–47.
Han S, Li Z, Master LM, Master ZW, Wu A. Exogenous IGFBP-2 promotes proliferation, invasion, and chemoresistance to temozolomide in glioma cells via the integrin beta1-ERK pathway. Br J Cancer. 2014;111:1400–9.
Galeone A, Adams JM, Matsuda S, Presa MF, Pandey A, Han SY, et al. Regulation of BMP4/Dpp retrotranslocation and signaling by deglycosylation. eLife. 2020;9:e55596.
Samanta J, Kessler JA. Interactions between ID and OLIG proteins mediate the inhibitory effects of BMP4 on oligodendroglial differentiation. Development. 2004;131:4131–42.
Zhang K, Li L, Huang C, Shen C, Tan F, Xia C, et al. Distinct functions of BMP4 during different stages of mouse ES cell neural commitment. Development. 2010;137:2095–105.
Bond AM, Bhalala OG, Kessler JA. The dynamic role of bone morphogenetic proteins in neural stem cell fate and maturation. Dev Neurobiol. 2012;72:1068–84.
Tambe MA, Ng BG, Freeze HH. N-glycanase 1 transcriptionally regulates aquaporins independent of its enzymatic activity. Cell Rep. 2019;29:4620–31 e4624.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by UNTHSC Faculty Pilot Grant FY15 (RI6182), Advancing a Healthier Wisconsin Endowment at MCW (AHW 5520212/5520457), and American Cancer Society (RSG-20-063-01-TBE) to YCW. VJTL is supported by the NIH Predoctoral Training Grant (T32 AG020494). JH is supported by the AHA Predoctoral Fellowship (19PRE34380114). PH and PM are supported by the Bioplatforms Australia Fund. We thank assistance in bioinformatics analysis from the UAMS Bioinformatics Core Facility supported by the Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute and NIH (P20GM121293). We also thank assistance in somatic cell reprogramming from the Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Core directed by Dr. Gracious Ross at MCW
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
VJTL, JH, and AZ contributed to the study concept/design, data collection/analysis, and manuscript preparation. MRS and AK contributed to the data collection/analysis for CUBIC imaging and for single-cell RNA sequencing. PM and PH contributed to the data collection/analysis for proteomics analysis. JTB. and SDB contributed to bioinformatics analysis for single-cell RNA sequencing data. YCW supervised the study, coordinated research efforts, and contributed to the study concept/design, data analysis, and manuscript writing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Lin, V.J.T., Hu, J., Zolekar, A. et al. Deficiency of N-glycanase 1 perturbs neurogenesis and cerebral development modeled by human organoids. Cell Death Dis 13, 262 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-022-04693-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-022-04693-0