Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Ribosomal S6 protein kinase 4 promotes resistance to EZH2 inhibitors in glioblastoma

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) is a highly malignant type of brain tumor with limited treatment options. Recent research has focused on epigenetic regulatory factors, such as Enhancer of Zeste Homolog 2 (EZH2), which plays a role in gene expression through epigenetic modifications. EZH2 inhibitors have been developed as potential therapeutic agents for GBM, but resistance to these inhibitors remains a considerable challenge. This study aimed to investigate the role of ribosomal S6 protein kinase 4 (RSK4) in GBM and its association with resistance to EZH2 inhibitors. We first induced drug resistance in primary GBM cell lines by treatment with an EZH2 inhibitor and observed increases in the expression of stemness markers associated with glioblastoma stem cells (GSCs) in the drug-resistant cells. We also found high expression of RSK4 in GBM patient samples and identified the correlation of high RSK4 expression with poor prognosis and GSC marker expression. Further experiments showed that knocking down RSK4 in drug-resistant GBM cells restored their sensitivity to EZH2 inhibitors and decreased the expression of GSC markers, thus reducing their self-renewal capacity. From a mechanistic perspective, we discovered that RSK4 directly phosphorylates EZH2, activating the EZH2/STAT3 pathway and promoting resistance to EZH2 inhibitors in GBM. We also found that combining EZH2 inhibitors with an RSK4 inhibitor called BI-D1870 had better inhibitory effects on GBM occurrence and progression in both in vitro and in vivo experiments. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that RSK4 enhances cancer stemness and mediates resistance to EZH2 inhibitors in GBM. Combination treatment with EZH2 inhibitors and RSK4 inhibitors is a promising potential therapeutic strategy for GBM. Collectively, our results strongly demonstrate that RSK4 regulates the EZH2/STAT3 pathway to promote GSC maintenance and EZH2i resistance in a PRC2-independent manner, indicating that RSK4 is a promising therapeutic target for GBM.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: EZH2i resistance enhances cancer stemness in GBM cell lines.
Fig. 2: RSK4 is highly expressed in GSCs and is associated with poor survival in GBM patients.
Fig. 3: RSK4 is upregulated in EZH2i‑resistant GBM cell lines and promotes GSC maintenance.
Fig. 4: RSK4 directly phosphorylates EZH2 S21 and activates the EZH2/STAT3 pathway in EZH2i‑resistant GBM cell lines.
Fig. 5: Phosphorylation of EZH2 S21 and STAT3 activation are essential for RSK4-mediated EZH2i resistance and GSC maintenance.
Fig. 6: RSK4 inhibition with BI-D1870 increases EZH2i sensitivity in GBM cells in vivo.
Fig. 7: Schematic model.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Please contact the corresponding author for data requests.

References

  1. Schaff LR, Mellinghoff IK. Glioblastoma and other primary brain malignancies in adults: a review. JAMA. 2023;329:574–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Berger TR, Wen PY, Lang-Orsini M, Chukwueke UN. World Health Organization 2021 classification of central nervous system tumors and implications for therapy for adult-type gliomas: a review. JAMA Oncol. 2022;8:1493–501.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Horbinski C, Berger T, Packer RJ, Wen PY. Clinical implications of the 2021 edition of the WHO classification of central nervous system tumours. Nat Rev Neurol. 2022;18:515–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Phillips RE, Soshnev AA, Allis CD. Epigenomic reprogramming as a driver of malignant glioma. Cancer Cell. 2020;38:647–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Krug B, Harutyunyan AS, Deshmukh S, Jabado N. Polycomb repressive complex 2 in the driver’s seat of childhood and young adult brain tumours. Trends Cell Biol. 2021;31:814–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Paskeh MDA, Mehrabi A, Gholami MH, Zabolian A, Ranjbar E, Saleki H, et al. EZH2 as a new therapeutic target in brain tumors: Molecular landscape, therapeutic targeting and future prospects. Biomed Pharmacother. 2022;146:112532.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim KH, Roberts CW. Targeting EZH2 in cancer. Nat Med. 2016;22:128–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Wiese M, Schill F, Sturm D, Pfister S, Hulleman E, Johnsen SA, et al. No significant cytotoxic effect of the EZH2 inhibitor tazemetostat (EPZ-6438) on pediatric glioma cells with wildtype histone 3 or mutated histone 3.3. Klin Padiatr. 2016;228:113–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mohammad F, Weissmann S, Leblanc B, Pandey DP, Hojfeldt JW, Comet I, et al. EZH2 is a potential therapeutic target for H3K27M-mutant pediatric gliomas. Nat Med. 2017;23:483–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. de Vries NA, Hulsman D, Akhtar W, de Jong J, Miles DC, Blom M, et al. Prolonged Ezh2 depletion in glioblastoma causes a robust switch in cell fate resulting in tumor progression. Cell Rep. 2015;10:383–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jin H, Wang L, Bernards R. Rational combinations of targeted cancer therapies: background, advances and challenges. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2023;22:213–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Romeo Y, Zhang X, Roux PP. Regulation and function of the RSK family of protein kinases. Biochem J. 2012;441:553–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dummler BA, Hauge C, Silber J, Yntema HG, Kruse LS, Kofoed B, et al. Functional characterization of human RSK4, a new 90-kDa ribosomal S6 kinase, reveals constitutive activation in most cell types. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:13304–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen L, Xu T, Jia Q, Wang X, Li M, Liang G. RSK4: a new prognostic factor in glioma. Pathol Res Pract. 2020;216:153020.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Xu J, Jia Q, Zhang Y, Yuan Y, Xu T, Yu K, et al. Prominent roles of ribosomal S6 kinase 4 (RSK4) in cancer. Pathol Res Pract. 2021;219:153374.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu Y, He W, Guo Y, Qu S, Yao F, Liu J, et al. CSNK1D is associated with stemness and invasiveness in glioblastoma. Pathol Res Pract. 2022;240:154187.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cai J, Ma H, Huang F, Zhu D, Zhao L, Yang Y, et al. Low expression of RSK4 predicts poor prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2014;7:4959–70.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. He Q, He R, Luo W, Gan X, Ma J, Chen G, et al. Expression of RSK4 in lung adenocarcinoma tissue and its clinicopathological value: a study based on RNA-seq data and immunohistochemistry. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2017;10:11405–14.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Thakur A, Rahman KW, Wu J, Bollig A, Biliran H, Lin X, et al. Aberrant expression of X-linked genes RbAp46, Rsk4, and Cldn2 in breast cancer. Mol Cancer Res. 2007;5:171–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fan L, Li P, Yin Z, Fu G, Liao DJ, Liu Y, et al. Ribosomal s6 protein kinase 4: a prognostic factor for renal cell carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2013;109:1137–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Serra V, Eichhorn PJ, Garcia-Garcia C, Ibrahim YH, Prudkin L, Sanchez G, et al. RSK3/4 mediate resistance to PI3K pathway inhibitors in breast cancer. J Clin Invest. 2013;123:2551–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Bender C, Ullrich A. PRKX, TTBK2 and RSK4 expression causes Sunitinib resistance in kidney carcinoma- and melanoma-cell lines. Int J Cancer. 2012;131:E45–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang A, Qu L, Wang L. At the crossroads of cancer stem cells and targeted therapy resistance. Cancer Lett. 2017;385:87–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Seguin L, Kato S, Franovic A, Camargo MF, Lesperance J, Elliott KC, et al. An integrin beta(3)-KRAS-RalB complex drives tumour stemness and resistance to EGFR inhibition. Nat Cell Biol. 2014;16:457–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Mikami S, Mizuno R, Kosaka T, Saya H, Oya M, Okada Y. Expression of TNF-alpha and CD44 is implicated in poor prognosis, cancer cell invasion, metastasis and resistance to the sunitinib treatment in clear cell renal cell carcinomas. Int J Cancer. 2015;136:1504–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Seo AN, Lee HJ, Kim EJ, Jang MH, Kim YJ, Kim JH, et al. Expression of breast cancer stem cell markers as predictors of prognosis and response to trastuzumab in HER2-positive breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2016;114:1109–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Miranda TB, Cortez CC, Yoo CB, Liang G, Abe M, Kelly TK, et al. DZNep is a global histone methylation inhibitor that reactivates developmental genes not silenced by DNA methylation. Mol Cancer Ther. 2009;8:1579–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Qi W, Chan H, Teng L, Li L, Chuai S, Zhang R, et al. Selective inhibition of Ezh2 by a small molecule inhibitor blocks tumor cells proliferation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:21360–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Knutson SK, Wigle TJ, Warholic NM, Sneeringer CJ, Allain CJ, Klaus CR, et al. A selective inhibitor of EZH2 blocks H3K27 methylation and kills mutant lymphoma cells. Nat Chem Biol. 2012;8:890–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Huang X, Yan J, Zhang M, Wang Y, Chen Y, Fu X, et al. Targeting epigenetic crosstalk as a therapeutic strategy for EZH2-aberrant solid tumors. Cell. 2018;175:186–99.e119.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Drosos Y, Myers JA, Xu B, Mathias KM, Beane EC, Radko-Juettner S, et al. NSD1 mediates antagonism between SWI/SNF and polycomb complexes and is required for transcriptional activation upon EZH2 inhibition. Mol Cell. 2022;82:2472–89.e2478.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang T, Guo Z, Huo X, Gong Y, Li C, Huang J, et al. Dysregulated lipid metabolism blunts the sensitivity of cancer cells to EZH2 inhibitor. EBioMed. 2022;77:103872.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Guryanova OA, Wu Q, Cheng L, Lathia JD, Huang Z, Yang J, et al. Nonreceptor tyrosine kinase BMX maintains self-renewal and tumorigenic potential of glioblastoma stem cells by activating STAT3. Cancer Cell. 2011;19:498–511.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Fan X, Khaki L, Zhu TS, Soules ME, Talsma CE, Gul N, et al. NOTCH pathway blockade depletes CD133-positive glioblastoma cells and inhibits growth of tumor neurospheres and xenografts. Stem Cells. 2010;28:5–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Verhaak RG, Hoadley KA, Purdom E, Wang V, Qi Y, Wilkerson MD, et al. Cancer Genome Atlas Research, integrated genomic analysis identifies clinically relevant subtypes of glioblastoma characterized by abnormalities in PDGFRA, IDH1, EGFR, and NF1. Cancer Cell. 2010;17:98–110.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Key Research and Development Projects of Shaanxi Province (No.2023-YBSF-129, 2022SF-029), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.82103522, 82373368), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No.2021TQ0362).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

FP, LZ, ML: data acquisition; XY, YW, PY: immunohistochemistry and Western blot; BW, JJ, YT, XY: clinical sample collection and data analysis; LC, JX, LW: study design, project administration and revision of manuscript. All authors have reviewed the final version of the manuscript and approved it for publication.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ligang Chen, Jin Xu or Li Wang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All animal experiments were carried out in compliance with the principles and methods stated in the Guideline for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals in the Air Force Medical University. The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Medical Ethical Committee of Xijing Hospital. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Consent for publication

All authors have reviewed the final version of the manuscript and approved it for publication.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pang, F., Zhang, L., Li, M. et al. Ribosomal S6 protein kinase 4 promotes resistance to EZH2 inhibitors in glioblastoma. Cancer Gene Ther 30, 1636–1648 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41417-023-00666-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41417-023-00666-3

Search

Quick links