Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Protocol
  • Published:

Antibiotic resistance–mediated isolation of scaffold-specific natural product producers

Abstract

For over half a century, actinomycetes have served as the most promising source of novel antibacterial scaffolds. However, over the years, there has been a decline in the discovery of new antibiotics from actinomycetes. This is partly due to the use of standard screening methods and platforms that result in the re-discovery of the same molecules. Thus, according to current estimates, the discovery of a new antibacterial requires screening of tens to hundreds of thousands of bacterial strains. We have devised a resistance-based antibacterial discovery platform by harnessing the innate self-protection mechanism of antibiotic producers. This protocol provides a detailed method for isolation of scaffold-specific antibacterial producers by isolating strains in the presence of a selective antibiotic. As a specific example, we describe isolation of glycopeptide antibiotic (GPA) producers from soil actinomycetes, using vancomycin as the antibiotic resistance filter. However, the protocol can be adapted to isolate diverse producers from various sources producing different scaffolds, by selecting an appropriate antibiotic as a screening filter. The protocol provides a solution for two major bottlenecks that impede the new drug discovery pipeline: low hit frequency and re-discovery of known molecules. The entire protocol, from soil collection to identification of putative antibacterial producers, takes about 6 weeks to complete.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: A schematic overview of key steps involved in antibiotic resistance–based antibacterial discovery.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Waksman, S.A. Microbial Antagonisms and Antibiotic Substances (The Commonwealth Fund, 1945).

  2. Payne, D.J., Gwynn, M.N., Holmes, D.J. & Pompliano, D.L. Drugs for bad bugs: confronting the challenges of antibacterial discovery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 6, 29–40 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Singh, S.B., Phillips, J.W. & Wang, J. Highly sensitive target-based whole-cell antibacterial discovery strategy by antisense RNA silencing. Curr. Opin. Drug Discov. Devel. 10, 160–166 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Thaker, M.N. & Wright, G.D. Opportunities for synthetic biology in antibiotics: expanding glycopeptide chemical diversity. ACS Synth. Biol. 10.1021/sb300092n (2012).

  5. Brady, S.F. Construction of soil environmental DNA cosmid libraries and screening for clones that produce biologically active small molecules. Nat. Protoc. 2, 1297–1305 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sheridan, C. Recasting natural product research. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 385–387 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Baltz, R.H. Marcel Faber Roundtable: is our antibiotic pipeline unproductive because of starvation, constipation or lack of inspiration? J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 33, 507–513 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Thaker, M.N. et al. Identifying producers of antibacterial compounds by screening for antibiotic resistance. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 922–927 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cundliffe, E. & Demain, A.L. Avoidance of suicide in antibiotic-producing microbes. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 37, 643–672 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. D'Costa, V.M., McGrann, K.M., Hughes, D.W. & Wright, G.D. Sampling the antibiotic resistome. Science 311, 374–377 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Vieira, F.C. & Nahas, E. Comparison of microbial numbers in soils by using various culture media and temperatures. Microbiol. Res. 160, 197–202 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hamaki, T. et al. Isolation of novel bacteria and actinomycetes using soil-extract agar medium. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 99, 485–492 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Busti, E. et al. Antibiotic-producing ability by representatives of a newly discovered lineage of actinomycetes. Microbiology 152, 675–683 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Suzuki, S., Okuda, T. & Komatsubara, S. Selective isolation and distribution of Sporichthya strains in soil. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65, 1930–1935 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Suzuki, S., Okuda, T. & Komatsubara, S. Selective isolation and distribution of Actinobispora strains in soil. Can. J. Microbiol. 46, 708–715 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Suzuki, S.I., Okuda, T. & Komatsubara, S. Selective isolation and distribution of the genus Planomonospora in soils. Can. J. Microbiol. 47, 253–263 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Suzuki, S., Okuda, T. & Komatsubara, S. Selective isolation and study on the global distribution of the genus Planobispora in soils. Can. J. Microbiol. 47, 979–986 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hayakawa, M., Iino, H., Takeuchi, S. & Yamazaki, T. Application of a method incorporating treatment with chloramine-T for the selective isolation of streptosporangiaceae from soil. J. Ferment. Bioeng. 84, 599–602 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hayakawa, M., Kajiura, T. & Nonomura, H. New methods for the highly selective isolation of Streptosporangium and Dactylosporangium from soil. J. Ferment. Bioeng. 72, 327–333 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hayakawa, M., Sadakata, T., Kajiura, T. & Nonomura, H. New methods for the highly selective isolation of Micromonospora and Microbispora from soil. J. Ferment. Bioeng. 72, 320–326 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Clayton, R.A., Sutton, G., Hinkle, P.S. Jr., Bult, C. & Fields, C. Intraspecific variation in small-subunit rRNA sequences in GenBank: why single sequences may not adequately represent prokaryotic taxa. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 45, 595–599 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Guo, Y., Zheng, W., Rong, X. & Huang, Y. A multilocus phylogeny of the Streptomyces griseus 16S rRNA gene clade: use of multilocus sequence analysis for streptomycete systematics. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 58, 149–159 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lanoot, B. et al. BOX-pCR fingerprinting as a powerful tool to reveal synonymous names in the genus Streptomyces. Emended descriptions are proposed for the species Streptomyces cinereorectus, S. fradiae, S. tricolor, S. colombiensis, S. filamentosus, S. vinaceus and S. phaeopurpureus. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 27, 84–92 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Korbie, D.J. & Mattick, J.S. Touchdown PCR for increased specificity and sensitivity in PCR amplification. Nat. Protoc. 3, 1452–1456 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by a Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) grant MT-14981, a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council grant (237480) and by a Canada Research Chair in antibiotic biochemistry (G.D.W.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

M.N.T. designed the experiments, interpreted the results and developed SOPs; N.W. performed the phylogenetic-tree studies; and G.D.W. conceived the idea and analyzed the results. All the authors wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gerry D Wright.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thaker, M., Waglechner, N. & Wright, G. Antibiotic resistance–mediated isolation of scaffold-specific natural product producers. Nat Protoc 9, 1469–1479 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2014.093

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2014.093

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research